Demise of the Crown is the legal term in the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth realms for the transfer of the Crown upon the death or abdication of the monarch. The Crown transfers automatically to the monarch's heir. The concept evolved in the kingdom of England, and was continued in Great Britain and then the United Kingdom. The concept also became part of the constitutions of the British colonies, and was continued in the constitutions of the Commonwealth realms, until modified within those realms.
Originally, the demise of the Crown in England had significant legal effects: individuals who had been appointed to office by the deceased monarch lost their positions; if Parliament was sitting, it automatically dissolved; and actions in the royal courts automatically discontinued and had to be re-started. Almost all of these legal effects have been abolished by statutes of the British Parliament and the parliaments of the Commonwealth realms, so that the demise of the Crown no longer has much legal significance.
Although the concept of the demise of the Crown originally was based on the monarch's death, it was used in 1936 to describe the transfer of the Crown to George VI upon the abdication of Edward VIII, as the Act of Parliament that gave legal effect to the abdication specified that, upon the instrument of abdication taking effect, Edward VIII would cease to be King and there would be a demise of the Crown.
Other monarchies use different terminologies for the end of a reign.
If the monarch who dies or abdicates is the Queen and her successor is the King, references to 'Queen's' automatically changes to 'King's' - for example, lawyers in the Dominions of the Crown who are Queen's Counsel (Q.C.) at the time of the demise become King's Counsel (K.C.) without any need to seek new letters patent. The reverse is also true, as was the case from 6 February 1952 upon the death of King George VI, when living King's Counsel became Queen's Counsel.
The term "demise" was originally a law French term used for the transfer of real property, whether by lease or sale. [1] Blackstone notes that this term for the transfer of property then became used on the death of the monarch to mean "the kingdom is transferred or demised to his successor". "Demise" in this sense is not referring to the monarch's death, but to the automatic transfer of the monarchy to the heir, by operation of law:
A THIRD attribute of the king's majesty is his perpetuity. The law ascribes to him, in his political capacity, an absolute immortality. The king never dies. Henry, Edward, or George may die; but the king survives them all. For immediately upon the decease of the reigning prince in his natural capacity, his kingship or imperial dignity, by act of law, without any interregnum or interval, is vested at once in his heir, who is, eo instanti, king to all intents and purposes. [2] [3]
The historical effects of the demise of the Crown were the result of the personal nature of the monarch as head of government in the medieval period. The legislative, executive and judicial functions of government all flowed from the monarch's personal authority. The monarch's death therefore affected all aspects of the monarchical government. [4] : 696–697
A demise resulted in the immediate dissolution of Parliament. Parliaments were summoned at the will of the king, and dissolved by the king, at his personal decision. Upon the death of the king, the king's parliament dissolved. It was up to the next king to decide whether to call a parliament, and when it would be called. [2] [5] [4] : 703–704
All Crown offices appointed by the monarch immediately became vacant upon the demise of the Crown. The principle applied to the Great Officers of State, such as the Lord Chancellor, the Lord High Treasurer, the Earl Marshal, and the Lord High Admiral. All of these officials held their positions by virtue of the personal appointment by the monarch, and became vacant on the death of the monarch. Lesser royal offices also became vacant upon a demise. As all royal servants were appointed by, and served, the monarch, that service would end upon the death of the monarch. [6] : 278 The cumbersome effect of the entire royal service losing office was mitigated by a practice which evolved of lesser royal officials being continued in office, provided they swore allegiance to the new monarch. However, this practice did not initially apply to the great officers of state, who were the core of the monarch's government. The new monarch selected his own great officers. [4] : 698–701
The demise of the Crown also brought to an end all existing proceedings in the royal courts. The reason was that proceedings in those courts were instituted by means of writs issued in the king's name and authority. When the monarch died, that authority lapsed. The practice evolved of allowing a litigant to re-commence the action, but at the cost of paying for a new writ. [4] : 705–706 The first reform to this aspect of the demise of the Crown was a statute enacted immediately after the accession of Edward VI, after the lengthy reign of his father, Henry VIII. Parliament passed a statute providing that plaintiffs did not have to recommence their actions. [7]
Following the Glorious Revolution, the flight of James II with his infant son Prince James to France, and the installation of William III and Mary II as joint monarchs, there was political unrest in Britain. The legal effects of the demise of the Crown took on much greater political significance, as explained by Arthur Berriedale Keith, a Scottish constitutional expert:
The practical inconvenience, and even danger, to which the legal theory might give rise became evident in the reign of Anne. In all probability the successor to the Crown, designated by Statute, would be in Hanover at the moment of the Queen’s death. A rival claimant to the Crown was no farther off than St. Germains [near Paris], and at this critical time the Privy Council would be dissolved, all the great offices of State would be vacant, and every commission in the Army would have lapsed. [6] : 279
In response to this situation, the English Parliament enacted laws to preserve royal officials in office, notwithstanding the demise of the Crown. The first law, the Security of King and Government Act 1695, was enacted after the death of Queen Mary. It provided that upon the death of King William, office-holders would continue in office for six months, unless the new monarch, Queen Anne, chose to dismiss them. [8] After William's death in 1702 and the accession of Queen Anne, Parliament enacted another law dealing more generally with the issues relating to the demise, the Demise of the Crown Act 1702. That Act confirmed that office-holders stayed in office for six months, provided they swore oaths of allegiance to Anne. The 1702 Act made clear that the new rule applied to all subsequent demises. [9] In 1707, the new British Parliament passed the Succession to the Crown Act 1707, confirming that the Privy Council could continue to function upon a demise. [10] [4] : 699–701
The same concern arose with respect to Parliament: upon a demise, Parliament would automatically dissolve. If the Stuart pretender tried to seize power when a monarch died, there would be no parliament at the moment of extreme political crisis. [4] : 704 Parliament therefore enacted statutes to ensure its own existence after a demise. The Security of King and Government Act 1695 provided that Parliament would continue to exist for six months following the death of King William. If no parliament was in existence, the former parliament would be immediately recalled. [11] After William's death and Queen Anne's accession, Parliament enacted similar provisions in the Succession to the Crown Act 1707, to ensure Parliament would continue until the Hanoverian heir arrived after Anne's death. If Parliament was adjourned or prorogued, it was to be recalled immediately upon the monarch's death. [12]
The Demise of the Crown Act 1702 also dealt with the effect of the demise on court actions. It provided that all courts, judicial commissions, and court actions continued notwithstanding the death of King William, and that the same principle would apply to all future demises of the Crown. [13]
The British Parliament continued to reduce the impact of the demise of the Crown during the 19th century. For instance, as the British Empire expanded, the issue of communications with distant colonies became an issue. Parliament therefore enacted a series of statutes to continue in office colonial governors, military officers, and other public servants, giving them longer periods of time to swear oaths of allegiance to the new monarch than was the case for public officials in Britain. [4] : 701–702
In 1867, Parliament enacted the Representation of the People Act 1867, repealing the provisions in the Succession to the Crown Act 1707 which extended the life of a Parliament for six months after the death of the monarch. Instead, the 1867 Act provided that an existing Parliament continues to the end of its normal term, unaffected by the monarch's death. [14] [15]
The last time the British Parliament legislated for the Empire as a whole in relation to the demise of the Crown was upon the death of Queen Victoria in 1901. It enacted the Demise of the Crown Act 1901, which continued in office all public officials in Britain and the Empire. [16] This Act expressly applies to all future demises. Accordingly, even the Prime Minister no longer needs to be reappointed after a demise of the Crown, as all officeholders immediately continue to serve under the new monarch for an unlimited period of time, without the legal need to retake their oaths of allegiance or of office, their appointments being unaffected by the demise of the Crown.
In Parliament, however, by tradition members of both Houses still retake their oaths of allegiance upon a demise of the Crown. While Parliament is required to meet upon a demise, there is no legal compulsion on members of the House of Commons to retake their oaths in mid-Parliament. The re-taking of the oaths with the explicit mention of the new monarch's name is merely a matter of tradition. The oath taken to the new monarch's predecessor already includes a reference to heirs and successors anyway. In the House of Lords, however, there is an official requirement in the Standing Orders of that House that members must retake their oaths of allegiance in order to continue taking part in the business of the House.
Although the concept of the demise of the Crown evolved in the context of the death of the monarch, it was also used in the case of the Abdication of Edward VIII in 1936. The British Parliament passed a statute, His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act 1936, which declared that immediately on Edward granting royal assent, he would cease to be king and "...there shall be a demise of the Crown, and accordingly the member of the Royal Family then next in succession to the Throne shall succeed thereto and to all the rights, privileges, and dignities thereunto belonging.". [17] Edward's brother Albert, next in line, became king under the regnal name of George VI.
Upon the Crown's demise, in the United Kingdom, a meeting of the Accession Council is held at St James's Palace in London in order to give directions for the proclamation of the new monarch. All members of the Privy Council, the Lord Mayor of London and the Court of Aldermen, and the High Commissioners of the Commonwealth realms are invited to the Council. This meeting is to arrange for the formal proclamation of the new monarch. Neither the identity nor the accession to the throne of the next monarch depends on the Council, as the new monarch has already automatically succeeded by the demise of the Crown. The proclamation takes place in London at St James's Palace, Charing Cross, within the City Boundary at Temple Bar, and the Royal Exchange. The new monarch is also proclaimed at Edinburgh, Belfast and Cardiff. [18] [19]
The Succession to the Crown Act 1707 provides that if Parliament is adjourned or prorogued upon a demise of the Crown, it must meet as soon as possible. [20] If sitting, Parliament must immediately proceed to act without any summons in the usual form. [21] At the first meeting of Parliament under a new monarch there is no speech from the throne. All members of Parliament and members of the House of Lords gather in peace and swear or affirm an allegiance to the new sovereign. [22] The House votes an Address to the Crown in response to the official notification of the previous monarch's demise, expressing condolences upon the death of the previous monarch and pledging loyalty to his or her successor.
Under the Representation of the People Act 1985, if the demise of the Crown occurs during a general election, the vote is postponed by fourteen days. [23]
The legal effects of the demise of the Crown became part of the constitutional law of the British North American colonies, through the doctrine of the reception of English law. Since most of the eastern colonies were established during the long reign of George III from 1760, the effect of the demise of the Crown was not felt until his death in 1820. In Lower Canada, one of the shortest parliaments in Canadian history was cut short by the demise of the Crown: the 10th Parliament of Lower Canada sat for only 13 days, from its opening on April 11, 1820, to its dissolution on April 24, when the news arrived of George III's death. [4] : p.709
The practice of dissolving the parliament upon the demise of the Crown was ended in the Parliament of the Province of Canada in 1843, and later re-affirmed with the Parliament of Canada through new legislation in 1867. [24]
In Canada the Privy Council for Canada meets in Ottawa to perform the same functions as in other realms. [25]
In Canada, upon the demise of the Crown, the Prime Minister is responsible for convening the Parliament, tabling a resolution of loyalty and condolence from the Parliament to the next monarch of Canada, and arranging for the motion to be seconded by the leader of the Official Opposition. The Prime Minister will then move to adjourn Parliament. [25] [26]
Upon the accession of the new monarch, similar formalities are followed in the Commonwealth realms, as the monarch holds their position separately in each realm.
Similar meetings are held by Australia's Federal Executive Council in Canberra, the Executive Councils of the various Australian States, the Executive Council of New Zealand in Wellington and equivalent bodies in the other Commonwealth realms.
Viceregal appointments remain unaffected by the demise of the Crown. Governors-General, Governors, and Lieutenant-Governors automatically remain in office, therefore, serving under both the preceding and succeeding monarchs.
The coronation of the new monarch usually occurs within eighteen months, but is not necessary to secure the succession. The succession of the new monarch occurs automatically upon the demise of the Crown. [27]
The coronation is purely the ceremonial end of the accession process.
The Privy Council is a formal body of advisers to the sovereign of the United Kingdom. Its members, known as privy counsellors, are mainly senior politicians who are current or former members of either the House of Commons or the House of Lords.
The Statute of Westminster 1931 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that sets the basis for the relationship between the Dominions and the Crown.
A Commonwealth realm is a sovereign state within the Commonwealth that has Charles III as its monarch and ceremonial head of state. All the realms are equal with and independent of the others, though one person, resident in the United Kingdom, acts as monarch of each. The phrase Commonwealth realm is an informal description not used in any law.
In the United Kingdom, the Accession Council is a ceremonial body which assembles in St James's Palace in London upon the death of a monarch to make formal proclamation of the accession of the successor to the throne. Under the terms of the Act of Settlement 1701, a new monarch succeeds automatically. The proclamation confirms by name the identity of the new monarch, expresses loyalty to the "lawful and rightful Liege Lord", and formally announces the new monarch's regnal name, while the monarch and others, in front of the council, sign and seal several documents concerning the accession. An Accession Council has confirmed every English monarch since James I in 1603.
The monarchy of New Zealand is the constitutional system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of New Zealand. The current monarch, King Charles III, acceded to the throne following the death of his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, on 8 September 2022 in the United Kingdom. The King's elder son, William, Prince of Wales, is the heir apparent.
Succession to the British throne is determined by descent, sex, legitimacy, and religion. Under common law, the Crown is inherited by a sovereign's children or by a childless sovereign's nearest collateral line. The Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701 restrict succession to the throne to the legitimate Protestant descendants of Sophia of Hanover who are in "communion with the Church of England". Spouses of Catholics were disqualified from 1689 until the law was amended in 2015. Protestant descendants of those excluded for being Roman Catholics are eligible.
The Regency Acts are Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed at various times, to provide a regent in the event of the reigning monarch being incapacitated or a minor. Prior to 1937, Regency Acts were passed only when necessary to deal with a specific situation. In 1937, the Regency Act 1937 made general provision for a regent, and established the office of Counsellor of State, a number of whom would act on the monarch's behalf when the monarch was temporarily absent from the realm or experiencing an illness that did not amount to legal incapacity. This Act, as modified by the Regency Acts of 1943 and 1953, forms the main law relating to regency in the United Kingdom today.
From 1910 to 1961 the Union of South Africa was a self-governing country that shared a monarch with the United Kingdom and other Dominions of the British Empire. The monarch's constitutional roles were mostly delegated to the Governor-General of the Union of South Africa.
The Oath of Allegiance is a promise to be loyal to the British monarch, and their heirs and successors, sworn by certain public servants in the United Kingdom, and also by newly naturalised subjects in citizenship ceremonies. The current standard wording of the oath of allegiance is set out in the Promissory Oaths Act 1868.
The monarchy of Solomon Islands is a system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of Solomon Islands. The current monarch and head of state since 8 September 2022, is King Charles III. As sovereign, he is the personal embodiment of the Crown of Solomon Islands. Although the person of the sovereign is equally shared with 14 other independent countries within the Commonwealth of Nations, each country's monarchy is separate and legally distinct. As a result, the current monarch is officially titled King of Solomon Islands and, in this capacity, he and other members of the royal family undertake public and private functions domestically and abroad as representatives of Solomon Islands. However, the King is the only member of the royal family with any constitutional role.
The monarchy of Antigua and Barbuda is a system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of Antigua and Barbuda. The current Antiguan and Barbudan monarch and head of state, since 8 September 2022, is King Charles III. As sovereign, he is the personal embodiment of the Crown of Antigua and Barbuda. Although the person of the sovereign is equally shared with 14 other independent countries within the Commonwealth of Nations, each country's monarchy is separate and legally distinct. As a result, the current monarch is officially titled King of Antigua and Barbuda and, in this capacity, he and other members of the Royal Family undertake public and private functions domestically and abroad as representatives of Antigua and Barbuda. However, the King is the only member of the Royal Family with any constitutional role.
The monarchy of Australia is a key component of Australia's form of government, embodied by the Australian sovereign and head of state. The Australian monarchy is a constitutional one, modelled on the Westminster system of parliamentary government, while incorporating features unique to the constitution of Australia.
The monarchy of Jamaica is a system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of Jamaica. The current Jamaican monarch and head of state, since 8 September 2022, is King Charles III. As sovereign, he is the personal embodiment of the Jamaican Crown. Although the person of the sovereign is equally shared with 14 other independent countries within the Commonwealth of Nations, each country's monarchy is separate and legally distinct. As a result, the current monarch is officially titled King of Jamaica and, in this capacity, he and other members of the royal family undertake public and private functions domestically and abroad as representatives of the Jamaican state. However, the monarch is the only member of the royal family with any constitutional role.
The Regency Act 1830 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed to provide for the event that King William IV died while the next person in line to the throne was not yet aged 18. It provided for a regency until the new monarch reached the age of 18, and also would have enabled a posthumous child of King William IV to replace Queen Victoria on the throne. However, the Act never came into force, because William was not survived by a legitimate child, and Victoria became queen in 1837 a few weeks after turning 18.
The monarchy of The Bahamas is a system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas. The current Bahamian monarch and head of state since 8 September 2022, is King Charles III. As sovereign, he is the personal embodiment of the Bahamian Crown. Although the person of the sovereign is equally shared with 14 other independent countries within the Commonwealth of Nations, each country's monarchy is separate and legally distinct. As a result, the current monarch is officially titled King of The Bahamas and, in this capacity, he and other members of the royal family undertake public and private functions domestically and abroad as representatives of the Bahamian state. However, the King is the only member of the Royal Family with any constitutional role.
The monarchy of Grenada is a system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of Grenada. The current Grenadian monarch and head of state, since 8 September 2022, is King Charles III. As sovereign, he is the personal embodiment of the Grenadian Crown. Although the person of the sovereign is equally shared with 14 other independent countries within the Commonwealth of Nations, each country's monarchy is separate and legally distinct. As a result, the current monarch is officially titled King of Grenada and, in this capacity, he and other members of the royal family undertake public and private functions domestically and abroad as representatives of Grenada. However, the King is the only member of the royal family with any constitutional role.
The monarchy of Saint Kitts and Nevis is a system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of Saint Kitts and Nevis. The current monarch of Saint Kitts and Nevis, since 8 September 2022, is King Charles III. As sovereign, he is the personal embodiment of the Crown of Saint Kitts and Nevis. Although the person of the sovereign is equally shared with 14 other independent countries within the Commonwealth of Nations, each country's monarchy is separate and legally distinct. As a result, the current monarch is officially titled King of Saint Christopher and Nevis and, in this capacity, he and other members of the royal family undertake public and private functions domestically and abroad as representatives of Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, the King is the only member of the royal family with any constitutional role.
The monarchy of Saint Lucia is a system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of Saint Lucia. The current monarch and head of state, since 8 September 2022, is King Charles III. As sovereign, he is the personal embodiment of the Saint Lucian Crown. Although the person of the sovereign is equally shared with 14 other independent countries within the Commonwealth of Nations, each country's monarchy is separate and legally distinct. As a result, the current monarch is officially titled King of Saint Lucia and, in this capacity, he and other members of the Royal Family undertake public and private functions domestically and abroad as representatives of the Saint Lucian state. However, the King is the only member of the royal family with any constitutional role.
The monarchy of Tuvalu is a system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of Tuvalu. The current Tuvaluan monarch and head of state since 8 September 2022 is King Charles III. As sovereign, he is the personal embodiment of the Tuvaluan Crown. Although the person of the sovereign is equally shared with 14 other independent countries within the Commonwealth of Nations, each country's monarchy is separate and legally distinct. As a result, the current monarch is officially titled King of Tuvalu and, in this capacity, he and other members of the royal family undertake public and private functions domestically and abroad as representatives of the Tuvaluan state. However, the King is the only member of the royal family with any constitutional role.
Royal Succession bills and acts are laws or pieces of proposed legislation to determine the legal line of succession to the Monarchy of the United Kingdom.