Denial of Violence

Last updated • 4 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

First edition Denial of Violence.jpg
First edition

Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present and Collective Violence Against the Armenians, 1789–2009 is a 2015 book by Turkish sociologist Fatma Müge Göçek which deals with the denial, justification, and rationalization of state-sponsored violence against Armenians in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey from the eighteenth to the twenty-first century, focusing especially on the Armenian genocide and its persistent denial in Turkey. [1] [2] [3] Among the arguments made in the book is that the Armenian genocide was an act of foundational violence that enabled the creation of the Republic of Turkey and its continuing denial is an ideological foundation of the Turkish nation-state. The book was praised by reviewers for its extensive research and methodological innovation, although some noted that it was dense and not easy to read for those not familiar with the topic.

Contents

Publication history

Göçek spent 12 years researching and writing the book, [4] which was published by Oxford University Press in 2015. [5]

Content

Göçek analyzes 356 memoirs, written by 307 authors, mostly Turks, for what they have to say about collective anti-Armenian violence. [6] She did not select these works but instead "systematically read all books printed in Turkey in Turkish after the Latin script reform of 1928 that contained people’s recollections of what went on around them from the year 1789 to 2009". [4] This systematic approach, Göçek argues, helps the researcher investigate memoirs as sources without falling prey to the biases inherent to such sources. [7] She mainly investigates the ways in which Ottoman and Turkish elites understood, rationalized, justified, and denied "their own culture of anti-Armenian violence through two centuries". [8] [9]

She argues that the Armenian genocide was an act of foundational violence that enabled the creation of the Turkish nation-state and that its denial is an ideological foundation of that state. [8] She analyzes denial as a process, where each episode of violence is built on previous denials and leads to additional denials. [7] According to Göçek, denial is the factor that perpetuates collective violence across centuries. [10]

The book contains an introduction, conclusion, and four chapters: "Imperial Denial of Origins of Violence, 1789–1907", "Young Turk Denial of the Act of Violence, 1908–1918", "Early Republican Denial of Actors of Violence, 1919–1973", and "Late Republican Denial of Responsibility for Violence, 1974–2009". [11]

Göçek expresses hope that her documentation of violence in Ottoman and Turkish sources "will hopefully enable the contemporary Turks to recognise what happened in their past as narrated by their own ancestors". [9]

Reception

Jo Laycock states that "this highly detailed account is by no means an easy introduction"; Göçek presumes knowledge of the Armenian genocide itself as well as willingness to engage with a variety of approaches to the subject matter. However, for specialists it "is a welcome addition to the scholarship" and "conceptually and methodologically sophisticated". [9] Sossie Kasbarian and Kerem Öktem called the book "the finest scholarship" and "a ground-breaking contribution to our knowledge about the Genocide, its denial by the Muslim–Turkish elites and its foundational role for the Turkish nation-state". [12]

Historian Stefan Ihrig criticizes the book for sometimes not challenging her sources when they make false claims. According to Ihrig, the book "holds a mirror to official denial" and readers not familiar with Turkey's official narrative may not appreciate Göcek's achievement. Although "Göcek’s experiment perhaps does not entirely succeed", "the resulting book provides an immense treasure trove for readers and future researchers". According to Ihrig, each chapter could have been its own book, with additional contextualization and narrative. [4]

Turkish sociologist Ateş Altınordu praises Göçek's "impressive breadth of research" and "many original insights", as well as contributing to the use of memoirs in sociology and the sociology of emotions. He is critical of the lack of biographical details given to memoirists in the text, forcing the reader to investigate footnotes for details. He concludes that the book is "the definitive study of the denial of the Armenian Genocide", and is likely to remain so "for a long time". [7]

Andrekos Varnava praises Göçek for how "she uses the words of the perpetrators of collective violence to indict themselves" and for "her skilful and theoretically inspired analysis". However, he criticizes the lack of distinction made between genocide and ethnic cleansing and states that, "readers could be put off by the length and density of the chapters". Varnava nevertheless considers the book a "must read" for those interested in Turkish violence and denial as well as the denials of other mass atrocities. [6]

Keith David Watenpaugh states that the book "is vast and defies easy characterization: it is part history, part sociology, and part the journey of a truly thoughtful and engaged intellectual into her own and her family’s past". [8] Vicken Cheterian states that Denial of Violence is "a unique book, which will open new perspectives in the study of the dark sides of nationalist modernization". [10] Eldad Ben-Aharon states that the book is an "excellent monograph that offers, for the most part, nuanced interpretations of empirical research to fill a substantial gap in scholarship on this topic". He states that Göçek's "distinguished book" should be read by scholars of genocide studies and especially perpetrator studies. [1]

The book was also criticized for lack of references to recent works on the acts of violence itself, [6] [7] and the conclusion of the book was criticized for moralizing. [1]

Awards

Related Research Articles

Armenian genocide denial Fringe theory that the Armenian genocide did not occur

Armenian genocide denial is the claim that the Ottoman Empire and its ruling party, the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), did not commit genocide against its Armenian citizens during World War I—a crime documented in a large body of evidence and affirmed by the vast majority of scholars. The perpetrators denied the genocide as they carried it out, claiming Armenians were resettled for military reasons, not exterminated. In the genocide's aftermath, incriminating documents were systematically destroyed, and denial has been the policy of every government of the Republic of Turkey, as of 2022.

Turkish Historical Society

The Turkish Historical Society is a research society studying the history of Turkey and the Turkish people, founded in 1931 by the initiative of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, with headquarters in Ankara, Turkey. It has been described as "the Kemalist official producer of nationalist historical narratives". Turkish sociologist Fatma Müge Göçek states that the TTK "failed to carry out independent research of Turkish history, remaining instead the voice of the official ideology".

The Assembly of Turkish American Associations (ATAA), created in 1979, is the umbrella organization whose stated purpose is to promote cooperation between the social and cultural Turkish American organizations around the United States. ATAA informs the Turkish American community on how to foster Turkish-American relations and promotes a positive view of Turkey. The organization is also known for its unsuccessful lawsuits arguing for the inclusion of Armenian genocide denial as a legitimate alternate view in the US educational curriculum.

Vahit Melih Halefoğlu was a Turkish politician and diplomat.

Ahmet Fevzi Big or Ahmet Fevzi Paşa (1871-1947) was an Ottoman commander of the Ninth Army Corps of the Ottoman Third Army. He was an Abkhazian immigrant from Düzce. He was from the Circassian Big family. His father's name was Yakub.

Halit Karsıalan Turkish military officer who made a name for himself for his bravery

Halit Karsıalan, commonly known as "Deli" Halid Pasha was a Turkish officer and politician.

Ali Kılıç Turkish politician

Ali Kılıç or Kilij Ali also known as Kılıç Ali Bey was a Turkish officer of the Ottoman Army and Turkish Army. He was also a politician of the Republic of Turkey. He married with Füreya Koral, one of the first Turkish ceramicists. He was appointed a judge of the Independence Tribunal in the mid 1920s. Football coach Gündüz Kılıç was his son.

Events in the year 1935 in Turkey.

Alaşehir Congress

The Alaşehir Congress was a local assembly of the Turkish National Movement held in the town of Alaşehir from 16 to 25 September 1919.

<i>They Can Live in the Desert but Nowhere Else</i>

"They Can Live in the Desert but Nowhere Else": A History of the Armenian Genocide is a book by Ronald Grigor Suny about the Armenian genocide, published by Princeton University Press in 2015. The book was praised as an accessible work that provides the academic consensus on why and how the Armenian genocide occurred.

Genocide justification Attempts to claim genocide is a moral action

Genocide justification is the claim that a genocide is morally excusable or necessary, in contrast to genocide denial, which rejects that genocide occurred. Perpetrators often claim that the genocide victims presented a serious threat, meaning that their killing was legitimate self-defense of a nation or state. According to modern international criminal law, there can be no excuse for genocide.

Turkish textbooks have faced criticism for their negative depiction of Greeks and Armenians, lack of depiction or explicit denial of Ottoman-era massacres and genocides, denial of the existence of the Kurdish people, as well as understating and condoning Ottoman-era slavery. According to Abdulkerim Sen study human rights education in Turkey subscribes to 'escapist model'; Sen says Turkish textbooks either deliberate avoid human rights issues, struggles, campaigns, and activists or window dress human rights issues by presenting de-contextualised narratives. Sen says the curricula fails in respect of critically examining on discrepancies about claims made in Turkish text books vis-à-vis realities of human rights; and has scope to improve curricula to encourage learners to explore transformative powers of Human Rights Education.

Bibliography of the Armenian genocide is a list of books about the Armenian genocide:

The terminology of the Armenian genocide is different in English, Turkish, and Armenian languages and has led to political controversies around the issue of Armenian genocide denial and Armenian genocide recognition. Although the majority of historians writing in English use the word "genocide", other terms exist.

Fatma Müge Göçek is a Turkish sociologist and professor at the University of Michigan.

Vicken Cheterian is a Lebanese-born journalist and author, who teaches international relations at Webster University Geneva. He has also lectured at University of Geneva and SOAS University of London (2012-14). Cheterian is also a columnist for the Istanbul-based weekly Agos. He holds a PhD from Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (IUHEI).

The Workshop for Armenian/Turkish Scholarship (WATS) is a group of scholars which is dedicated to transcending the nationalist historiography on the Armenian genocide and answering related questions. It first met in 2000. The workshop and the book it published were widely praised as first-class scholarship that significantly advanced the field. According to the workshop organizers, Turkish participants have faced state harassment for their participation.

Ahmet Esat Uras (1882–1957) was a perpetrator of the Armenian genocide who later wrote The Armenians in History and the Armenian Question (1950), an apologist work which has been described as "the ur-text of Turkish denialist 'scholarship'".

Foundational violence are acts of violence that create sovereignty, a process that often involves ethnic cleansing or even genocide. Fatma Müge Göçek writes:

It is a truism that all states that engage in nation-building commit collective violence, and it is also the case that such violence is often the most destructive in a nation's history... I argue here that among all acts of violence committed directly or indirectly by states and their governments, those that are temporally closest to the nation's creation myth are silenced and denied the most and the longest because they constitute a foundational violence. It is foundational because any discussion is framed as a direct threat to the legitimacy and stability of the state and society in question.

<i>Open Wounds</i>

Open Wounds: Armenians, Turks and a Century of Genocide is a 2015 book by Vicken Cheterian and published by Hurst that aims to be a "political history of the genocide since [1915] and the consequences of denialism". The book was praised for its comprehensiveness and accessibility to a wide audience.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Ben-Aharon, Eldad (2017). "Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present, and Collective Violence Against the Armenians, 1789–2009. By Fatma Müge Göçek". Journal of Social History. doi:10.1093/jsh/shw140.
  2. ↑ Usitalo, Steven A. (2017). "Denial of violence: Ottoman past, Turkish present, and collective violence against the Armenians, 1789–2009 by Fatma Müge Göçek, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015, xviii + 656 pp., US$78.00 (hardback), ISBN 978-0-199-33420-9". Canadian Slavonic Papers. 59 (3–4): 428–430. doi:10.1080/00085006.2017.1377444.
  3. ↑ Polláková, Ľubica (2015). "Denial of violence: Ottoman past, Turkish present, and collective violence against the Armenians, 1789–2009. By Fatma Müge Göçek". International Affairs. 91 (3): 651–652. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12307.
  4. 1 2 3 Ihrig, Stefan (2017). "Denial of Violence—Ottoman Past, Turkish Present, and Collective Violence against the Armenians, 1789−2009 Fatma Müge Göcek". Holocaust and Genocide Studies. 31 (3): 497–499. doi:10.1093/hgs/dcx048.
  5. ↑ Göçek 2015, Title page.
  6. 1 2 3 Varnava, Andrekos (2016). "Book Review: Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present and Collective Violence against the Armenians, 1789-2009". Genocide Studies and Prevention. 10 (1): 121–123. doi: 10.5038/1911-9933.10.1.1403 . ISSN   1911-0359.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Altinordu, Ateş (2016). "Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present, and Collective Violence against the Armenians, 1789–2009". Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. 45 (3): 309–311. doi:10.1177/0094306116641407r.
  8. 1 2 3 Watenpaugh, Keith David (2017). "Fatma Müge Göçek. Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present, and Collective Violence against the Armenians, 1789–2009; Ronald Grigor Suny. "They Can Live in the Desert but Nowhere Else": A History of the Armenian Genocide". The American Historical Review. 122 (2): 478–481. doi:10.1093/ahr/122.2.478.
  9. 1 2 3 Laycock, Joanne (2015). "Review of 'Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present and Collective Violence against the Armenians, 1789-2009'". Reviews in History. doi: 10.14296/RiH/2014/1809 .
  10. 1 2 Cheterian, Vicken (2016). "Denial of violence. Ottoman past, Turkish present, and collective violence against the Armenians 1789–2009, Fatma Müge Göçek, New York, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 656, US$78.00 (hardback), HC 978-0199334209". Nationalities Papers. 44 (4): 652–654. doi:10.1080/00905992.2016.1158006.
  11. ↑ Göçek 2015, Table of contents.
  12. ↑ Kasbarian, Sossie; Öktem, Kerem (2016). "One hundred years later: the personal, the political and the historical in four new books on the Armenian Genocide". Caucasus Survey. 4 (1): 92–104. doi:10.1080/23761199.2015.1129787.
  13. ↑ "Muge Gocek wins Mary Douglas Prize for Best Book 2015 | U-M LSA Center for Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies (CREES)". ii.umich.edu. Retrieved 12 January 2021.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.