Devastatio Constantinopolitana

Last updated

The Devastatio Constantinopolitana ("Devastation of Constantinople") is a short anonymous Latin eyewitness account of the Fourth Crusade. It covers the period from the preaching of Peter of Capua in France in 1198 [1] until 16 May 1204, shortly after the sack of Constantinople. [2]

Contents

The Devastatio's coverage is detailed and its perspective unique. It portrays the Fourth Crusade as a series of un-Christian betrayals of the poor by the rich. [1] Modern historians have used it more for its factual detail than for its perspective. [3]

Manuscript

The Devastatio survives in a single parchment manuscript bound as a codex, Cod. Marc. Lat. 1990 in the Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana in Venice. [3] It takes up a mere five pages (folios 253r–255r). [3] [1] The same manuscript also contains Ekkehard of Aura's Universal Chronicle; the Annals of Würzburg , which is a continuation of the Chronicle; and a brief account of the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215. The manuscript was completed in the late 13th or early 14th century by two different copyists, one adding Ekkehard and the Annals and the other the Devastatio and the Lateran account. [3]

The Devastatio is unrelated to the Chronicle and the Annals. Its title appears prominently at the beginning and a third person later wrote in the top margin Coronica captionis Constantinopolitanae (Chronicle of the Capture of Constantinople). The account of the Lateran council—which is found in four other manuscripts—is appended to the Devastatio without title or comment. Although they are not by the same author, the copyist probably intended them to be read together, with the council as a happy epilogue to the unfortunate crusade. The Lateran account in Cod. Marc. Lat. 1990 was almost certainly copied from a manuscript of Burchard of Ursperg's Chronicle. [3]

Authorship

The author of the Devastatio is not named in the sole surviving copy of the work and he does not refer to himself in the work. His identity, or aspects of it, must be inferred from the text. There is no scholarly consensus. Most scholars accept that he was from the Holy Roman Empire [lower-alpha 1] and probably a German speaker from the Rhineland, although Jules Tessier argues that he was more probably an Italian from Lombardy and Cynthia Arthur that he was more probably a Francophone from the County of Hainaut. As to his occupation, it has been argued both that he was a layman and that he was a secular cleric. Mauriciu Kandel believed he was a cleric who functioned as everything from a warrior to diarist to secretary. Arthur believed he was a lay notary. [3]

There is also no agreement on which contingent of the crusade the author accompanied. While Michael McCormick, [2] Carl Klimke and Tessier make him a partisan of Marquis Boniface I of Montferrat, Kandel places him in the following of Count Baldwin IX of Flanders and Arthur in that of Henry of Hainaut. Andrea rejects all these theories. [3]

The date of composition is unknown, but a reference to the pontificate of Pope Innocent III suggests that it was in the past, meaning that the Devastatio was only finalized after Innocent's death on 16 July 1216. [3] It has been proposed that the author relied for some of his information on the letters sent by Baldwin of Flanders to Pope Innocent after he became emperor, [4] but this is not conclusive. [2]

Content

On the third day following entry into Zara, a quarrel arose between the Venetians and the pilgrims, in which almost one hundred people were killed. The barons kept the city's goods for themselves, giving nothing to the poor. The poor labored mightily in poverty and hunger. Consequently, when they complained greatly about the barons, they managed to get ships to ferry them to Ancona, and one thousand departed with leave and, in addition, more than a thousand without leave. [3]

Devastatio, 253v–254r

The author probably relied mostly on notes he had kept while on crusade. [1] The final work, however, is a coherent and well-crafted history, not a diary. Tessier and Kandel took it to be an official work, but this is not widely accepted. To Andrea, there is no evidence that the author was close to any of the crusade leaders or their private councils. [3]

The Devastatio has been compared to a single-entry account book. The author pays special attention to numbers such as prices and payments and also keeps track of the size of the army by counting fatalities, casualties, leaves and desertions. The number of ships in the Venetian fleet and the number of siege engines is also tracked. These statistics are generally accurate, especially when based on first-hand observation, but they are occasionally infected by "camp rumour". [3]

The author also shows great interest in contracts, oaths, pledges and treaties, a series of eight of which structures the entire narrative. The first contracts are the crusading vows and the pledges made by surrogates to go in place of those crusaders who died before setting out. The compact made by the cities of Lombardy to hurry the armed contingents on their way to the rendezvous in Venice is presented as the first counter-crusade action. The next major contracts are the oath of allegiance taken by the barons to Boniface (who is referred to throughout simply as the Marquis) and the agreement with Venice, which results in the Siege of Zara. At Zara, the crusaders enter into a new agreement with Alexios Angelos to place him on the throne of the Byzantine Empire. In response to this diversion, some dissenting crusaders enter a counter-compact to go directly to the Holy Land. As the crusader army and Venetian fleet make their way to Constantinople, the Greeks they pass along the way pledge their allegiance to Alexios. After the capture of Constantinople, Alexios makes pledges and gives surety to the army in exchange for its continued support as he establishes his rule. Next, the new emperor contracts a portion of the army to help him pursue the deposed emperor Alexios III. All of Greece is said to have paid homage to the new emperor, but he reneged on his pledge and did not pay the crusaders for their aid. The army and its patron fall out, the latter is deposed and killed and the crusaders sack the city. The final contracts occur when the Greeks surrender to Boniface while the crusader army elects Baldwin as the new emperor. [3]

Listen, my beloved brethren: did not God choose the poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He promised to those who love Him? But you have dishonored the poor man. Is it not the rich who oppress you and personally drag you into court? Do they not blaspheme the fair name by which you have been called?

Epistle of James , 2:5–7 (NASB)

The Devastatio contains two errors of dating. It mistakenly dates Peter of Capua's preaching tour to 1202, probably because the author as a German was not directly familiar with events in France. [1] It also places the assault on the harbour wall of Constantinople correctly on 9 April 1204, but incorrectly states that this was during Holy Week. This error may indicate that the writer was writing long after events. [3]

The Devastatio is devoid of references to the supernatural. Neither does it reference the East–West schism between the churches. Thematically, however, the account is inspired by James 2:5–7. The anonymous author identifies with the rank-and-file, the "poor in the eyes of the world". [3] His attitude has often been labelled anti-Venetian, but it might be better labelled anti-elite. The material success of the barons and Venetians is contrasted with the plight of the poor crusaders. The Devastatio ends abruptly after noting the payments received by the commoners from the booty taken in Constantinople: "five marks to each foot soldier". [3]

Notes

Explanatory notes
  1. Kandel is the exception. He argues that he was from France. [3]
Citations

Sources

Editions
  • Andrea, Alfred J. (1993). "The Devastatio Constantinopolitana, A Special Perspective on the Fourth Crusade: An Analysis, New Edition, and Translation". Historical Reflections / Réflexions Historiques. 19 (1): 107–129, 131–149.
  • Andrea, Alfred J., ed. (2008). Contemporary Sources for the Fourth Crusade (rev. ed.). Brill.
  • Arthur, Cynthia Ruth (1981). The Destruction of Constantinople: A Translation with Introduction and Commentary (M.A. thesis). University of Vermont.
  • Pertz, Georg (ed.). "Devastatio Constantinopolitana". Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Scriptores. Vol. 16. pp. 9–12.
  • Hopf, Carl, ed. (1873). Chroniques gréco-romanes inédites ou peu connues. Berlin. pp. 86–92.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  • Muschietti, M. A. C. de; Díaz Pereyra, B. S., eds. (1970). "Devastatio Constantinopolitana: introducción, traducción y notas" (PDF). Anales de historia antigua y medieval. 15: 171–190.
Secondary sources

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexios III Angelos</span> Byzantine emperor from 1195 to 1203

Alexios III Angelos, Latinized as Alexius III Angelus, was Byzantine Emperor from March 1195 to 17/18 July 1203. He reigned under the name Alexios Komnenos associating himself with the Komnenos dynasty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexios V Doukas</span> Byzantine emperor in 1204

Alexios V Doukas, Latinized as Alexius V Ducas, was Byzantine emperor from February to April 1204, just prior to the sack of Constantinople by the participants of the Fourth Crusade. His family name was Doukas, but he was also known by the nickname Mourtzouphlos or Murtzuphlus (Μούρτζουφλος), referring to either bushy, overhanging eyebrows or a sullen, gloomy character. He achieved power through a palace coup, killing his predecessors in the process. Though he made vigorous attempts to defend Constantinople from the crusader army, his military efforts proved ineffective. His actions won the support of the mass of the populace, but he alienated the elite of the city. Following the fall, sack, and occupation of the city, Alexios V was blinded by his father-in-law, the ex-emperor Alexios III, and later executed by the new Latin regime. He was the last Byzantine emperor to rule in Constantinople until the Byzantine recapture of Constantinople in 1261.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pope Innocent III</span> Head of the Catholic Church from 1198 to 1216

Pope Innocent III, born Lotario dei Conti di Segni, was the head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 8 January 1198 until his death on 16 July 1216.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fourth Crusade</span> 1204 Crusade that captured Constantinople rather than Jerusalem

The Fourth Crusade (1202–1204) was a Latin Christian armed expedition called by Pope Innocent III. The stated intent of the expedition was to recapture the Muslim-controlled city of Jerusalem, by first defeating the powerful Egyptian Ayyubid Sultanate. However, a sequence of economic and political events culminated in the Crusader army's 1202 siege of Zara and the 1204 sack of Constantinople, rather than the conquest of Egypt as originally planned. This led to the Partitio terrarum imperii Romaniae or the partition of the Byzantine Empire by the Crusaders and their Venetian allies leading to a period known as Frankokratia, or "Rule of the Franks" in Greek.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latin Empire</span> 1204–1261 Crusader state on the former Byzantine Empire

The Latin Empire, also referred to as the Latin Empire of Constantinople, was a feudal Crusader state founded by the leaders of the Fourth Crusade on lands captured from the Byzantine Empire. The Latin Empire was intended to replace the Byzantine Empire as the Western-recognized Roman Empire in the east, with a Catholic emperor enthroned in place of the Eastern Orthodox Roman emperors. The main objective of the Latin Empire was planned by Venice, which promoted the creation of this state for their self-benefit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexios IV Angelos</span> Byzantine emperor from 1203 to 1204

Alexios IV Angelos, Latinized as Alexius IV Angelus, was Byzantine Emperor from August 1203 to January 1204. He was the son of Emperor Isaac II Angelos and his first wife, an unknown Palaiologina, who became a nun with the name Irene. His paternal uncle was his predecessor Emperor Alexios III Angelos. He is widely regarded as one of the worst Byzantine emperors for calling upon the Fourth Crusade to help him gain power, which ultimately led to the sack of Constantinople.

Boniface I, usually known as Boniface of Montferrat, was the ninth Marquis of Montferrat, a leader of the Fourth Crusade (1201–04) and the king of Thessalonica.

Geoffrey of Villehardouin was a French knight and historian who participated in and chronicled the Fourth Crusade. He is considered one of the most important historians of the time period, best known for writing the eyewitness account De la Conquête de Constantinople, about the battle for Constantinople between the Christians of the West and the Christians of the East on 13 April 1204. The Conquest is the earliest French historical prose narrative that has survived to modern times. Ηis full title was: "Geoffroi of Villehardouin, Marshal of Champagne and of Romania".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kingdom of Thessalonica</span> Short-lived Crusader State in Thessaly and Macedon

The Kingdom of Thessalonica was a short-lived Crusader State founded after the Fourth Crusade over conquered Byzantine lands in Macedonia and Thessaly.

Marco Sanudo was the creator and first Duke of the Duchy of the Archipelago, in Italian: "Duca del Mare Egeo e Re di Candia", Barone delle Isole di Nasso, Pario, Milo, Marine ed Andri, duchy granted by the Republic of Venice to him and all his descendants, after the Fourth Crusade his lineage became named Sanudo de Candia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agnes of France (empress)</span> Empress consort of the Byzantine Empire

Agnes of France, renamed Anna, was Byzantine empress by marriage to Alexios II Komnenos and Andronikos I Komnenos. She was a daughter of Louis VII of France and Adèle of Champagne.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael I Komnenos Doukas</span> Ruler of Epirus

Michael I Komnenos Doukas, Latinized as Comnenus Ducas, and in modern sources often recorded as Michael I Angelos, a name he never used, was the founder and first ruler of the Despotate of Epirus from c. 1205 until his assassination in 1214/15.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Zara</span> Part of the Fourth Crusade

The siege of Zara or siege of Zadar was the first major action of the Fourth Crusade and the first attack against a Catholic city by Catholic crusaders. The crusaders had an agreement with Venice for transport across the sea, but the price far exceeded what they were able to pay. Venice set the condition that the crusaders help them capture Zadar, a constant battleground between Venice on one side and Croatia and Hungary on the other, whose king, Emeric, pledged himself to join the Crusade. Although some of the crusaders refused to take part in the siege, the attack on Zadar began in November 1202 despite letters from Pope Innocent III forbidding such an action and threatening excommunication. Zadar fell on 24 November and the Venetians and the crusaders sacked the city. After wintering in Zadar, the Fourth Crusade continued its campaign, which led to the siege of Constantinople.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constantine Laskaris</span> Emperor and Autocrat of the Romans

Constantine Laskaris may have been Byzantine Emperor for a few months from 1204 to early 1205. He is sometimes called "Constantine XI", a numeral now usually reserved for Constantine Palaiologos.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Byzantine Empire under the Angelos dynasty</span> Byzantine Empire from 1185 to 1204

The Byzantine Empire was ruled by emperors of the Angelos dynasty between 1185 and 1204 AD. The Angeloi rose to the throne following the deposition of Andronikos I Komnenos, the last male-line Komnenos to rise to the throne. The Angeloi were female-line descendants of the previous dynasty. While in power, the Angeloi were unable to stop the invasions of the Turks by the Sultanate of Rum, the uprising and resurrection of the Bulgarian Empire, and the loss of the Dalmatian coast and much of the Balkan areas won by Manuel I Komnenos to the Kingdom of Hungary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sack of Constantinople</span> 1204 conquest during the Fourth Crusade

The sack of Constantinople occurred in April 1204 and marked the culmination of the Fourth Crusade. Crusader armies captured, looted, and destroyed parts of Constantinople, then the capital of the Byzantine Empire. After the capture of the city, the Latin Empire was established and Baldwin of Flanders was crowned Emperor Baldwin I of Constantinople in the Hagia Sophia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Constantinople (1203)</span> 1203 siege of Constantinople by a Crusader-Venetian alliance

The Siege of Constantinople in 1203 was a crucial episode of the Fourth Crusade, marking the beginning of a series of events that would ultimately lead to the fall of the Byzantine capital. The crusaders, diverted from their original mission to reclaim Jerusalem, found themselves in Constantinople, in support of the deposed emperor Isaac II Angelos and his son Alexios IV Angelos. The besieging forces, primarily composed of Western European knights faced initial setbacks, but their determination and advanced siege weaponry played a pivotal role in pressuring the Byzantine defenders.

Martin was the abbot of the Cistercian monastery of Pairis in Alsace, then part of the German kingdom in the Holy Roman Empire. Martin played a supporting role on the Fourth Crusade. He was a major source for the Historia Constantinopolitana, a history of the Fourth Crusade written by the monk Gunther of Pairis. Gunther's Historia serves as both a eulogy on the life of Martin and also an account of the translation of relics Martin brought to Pairis from the crusade. Gunther describes Martin as pleasant-looking, affable, eloquent, humble and wise.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter of Lucedio</span>

Peter was an Italian Cistercian monk and prelate. He was the abbot of Rivalta from 1180 until 1185, abbot of Lucedio from 1185 until 1205, abbot of La Ferté from 1205 until 1206, bishop of Ivrea from 1206 until 1208 and patriarch of Antioch from 1209 until his death. He is known as Peter of Magnano, Peter of Lucedio or Peter of Ivrea.

The timeline of the Latin Empire is a chronological list of events of the history of the Latin Empire—the crusader state that developed on the ruins of the Byzantine Empire after the Fourth Crusade in the 13th century.