Digital scholarship

Last updated
A digital learning environment E-learning.jpg
A digital learning environment

Digital scholarship is the use of digital evidence, methods of inquiry, research, publication and preservation to achieve scholarly and research goals. [1] Digital scholarship can encompass both scholarly communication using digital media and research on digital media. An important aspect of digital scholarship is the effort to establish digital media and social media as credible, professional and legitimate means of research and communication. [2] Digital scholarship has a close association with digital humanities, often serving as the umbrella term for discipline-agnostic digital research methods.

Contents

Digital scholarship may also include born-digital means of scholarly communication that are more traditional, like online journals and databases, e-mail correspondence and the digital or digitized collections of research and academic libraries. Since digital scholarship is often concerned with the production and distribution of digital media, discussions about copyright, fair use and digital rights management (DRM) frequently accompany academic analysis of the topic. Combined with open access, digital scholarship is offered as a more affordable and open model for scholarly communication. [3]

Development of the concept

The concept of digital scholarship (DS) emerged early in the 21st century. [4] [5] DS is described as "discipline-based scholarship produced with digital tools and presented in digital form". [6] It is also considered a research agenda concerned with the impact of Internet and digital technologies that are transforming scholarly practices. These include social and technological factors. [7]

In the 2010s, research took mainly two approaches to the subject: The impact of digital infrastructures, in particular the internet, on scholarship, where Christine L. Borgman is reference researcher [8] and the role of the academic library has been discussed in particular, [9] [10] and the impact of digital scholarship on the institutions and organization of academia. [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

According to Ernest L. Boyer in Scholarship Reconsidered, discovery, integration, application, and teaching are the four main aspects of scholarship. [16] [17] The growth of digital media means that the main areas of scholarship can each benefit from expansions in their own way thanks to the infinite sharability of digital content. [18]

In education, the main areas of relevance are science, technology, engineering and math. It is said that students learn best in a classroom when they are actively engaged. The emergence of digital scholarship and digital media allows for another means for students to become engaged. Key areas of academia that digital media is used on are to illustrate concepts, model displays and reinforce 21st century skills. [19]

Critics cite concerns about the legitimacy[ citation needed ], accessibility and verifiability[ citation needed ] of digital scholarship and the erosion of authors' rights as reasons to be concerned about digital scholarship. As scholarly communication evolves, controversy over the definition and value of the term "digital scholarship" is likely to continue.

Digital scholarship must take all of cultural, economic, personal, and institutional responsibilities to take its position as academic scholarship and to realize the core purpose of higher education with the possibilities of our time. [20] [ clarification needed ]

Intellectual property

Concerns with how to regulate digital scholarship have arisen across universities across the world. The explosion in availability and creation of scholarly works has led many universities to adjust their policies on how they will manage scholarship in the future. These universities feel pressured to take action because digital technologies have led to the easy reproduction and commodification of these creations. [21] Many universities are unclear how to address the copyrighting of online classes and media presentations. Current law does not cover these specific areas of media produced in the academic world. [22] In the past any printed work done by professors was considered their intellectual property, but now the question stands as to who owns these different forms of multimedia. One of the main concerns of faculty is that universities will soon take ownership of this digital media.

Universities have taken a growing interest in creations that have revenue-generating potential, like online classes or lecture slides, while also showing concern for products that may be used by comparable institutions, potentially reducing their competitive advantage. [22] In order to stay on top of others academically, universities have sought to keep the intellectual property created within the university away from others schools. Not only are universities using digital scholarship to make money and stay ahead, but they also have interests in protecting their brand. [22]

While universities attempt to protect digital scholarship, it is in many professors best interests for their creations to be seen by the world as to grow their brand and acclaim as a professor. Laws that may apply to digital scholarship are largely outdated but professors would like to use the argument of faculty ownership of traditional works as historical practice and practice compatible with mission of higher education as a public good. [22] Professors argue that it took time and serious effort to make the presentations, slides, media. [22] To date professors have been rarely questioned whether they have the right to bring their course outlines, lecture outlines, and lecture notes with them if they decide to leave the university where they created them. [22] Change over the ability of professors to bring digital scholarship with them is expected as universities have begun to take notice and assert copyrights. [22] Professors will argue that since they are the creators and authors of the product they are the owners according to law.

As of now most copyright laws in America indicate that the author or creator holds the copyright, but the same cannot be said for digital scholarship. The law explicitly states that if the work is within the scope of his or her employment then the work is the property of the employer. [22] Since the employer here would be the university, professors are technically creating work for hire. While faculty of universities appear to not be credited for their work, the primary reason for a university to take ownership of a faculty's work is that the member created the work using university funds mostly. [22] Solutions to the lack of clear laws regarding ownership of digital scholarship are not currently being created but many universities have created written contracts with professors over who owns future work or what they can do with previous work.

For example, in the U.S. Supreme Court case Stanford v. Roche , the court decided that Roche, a former Stanford researcher, was a co-owner with Stanford of patents for testing kits to detect HIV. [23] While this case does not deal with digital scholarship directly, it deals with the ownership of intellectual property of university employees when they leave. This case will set a precedent for future decisions with online classes, lecture notes, and outlines.

NEA Policy

The National Education Association (NEA), the largest professional educational association in the United States, updated its policy on digital learning in 2013. The policy stresses that students need to develop "advanced critical thinking and information literacy skills and master new digital tools", as well as "the initiative to become self-directed learners while adapting to the ever-changing digital information landscape". The NEA also believes that digital learning creates an environment in which learning can be more individualized to meet the needs of each student. The NEA mandates that all public schools must do their best to acquire necessary modern technologies and constantly revise teaching plans to incorporate technology where viable to best prepare students for the 21st century. The NEA's digital learning policy also states that technology must be used in an adaptive manner as to not become a distraction and to remain a tool, as well as that technology should not become a replacement for instructors, merely a supplement. [24]

Related Research Articles

Media literacy is an expanded conceptualization of literacy that includes the ability to access and analyze media messages as well as create, reflect and take action, using the power of information and communication to make a difference in the world. Media literacy is not restricted to one medium and is understood as a set of competencies that are essential for work, life, and citizenship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stanford Law School</span> Law school of Stanford University, California, U.S

Stanford Law School (SLS) is the law school of Stanford University, a private research university near Palo Alto, California. Established in 1893, Stanford Law had an acceptance rate of 6.28% in 2021, the second-lowest of any law school in the country. Paul Brest currently serves as Interim Dean.

The Open University of Israel is a distance-education university in Israel. It is one of ten public universities in Israel recognized by the Council of Higher Education (CHE). The Open University is unique in that it does not require a matriculation certificate, psychometric exam, or other entrance exam for admission to undergraduate studies.

The Five Colleges of Ohio, Inc. is an American academic and administrative consortium of five private liberal arts colleges in the state of Ohio. It is a nonprofit educational consortium established in 1995 to promote the broad educational and cultural objectives of its member institutions.

An information commons is an information system, such as a physical library or online community, that exists to produce, conserve, and preserve information for current and future generations. Wikipedia could be considered to be an information commons to the extent that it produces and preserves information through current versions of articles and histories. Other examples of an information commons include Creative Commons.

Christine L. Borgman is a distinguished Professor and Presidential Chair in Information Studies at UCLA. She is the author of more than 200 publications in the fields of information studies, computer science, and communication. Two of her sole-authored monographs, Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet and From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure: Access to Information in a Networked World, have won the Best Information Science Book of the Year award from the American Society for Information Science and Technology. She is a lead investigator for the Center for Embedded Networked Sensing (CENS), a National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center, where she conducts data practices research. She chaired the Task Force on Cyberlearning for the NSF, whose report, Fostering Learning in the Networked World, was released in July 2008. Prof. Borgman is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), a Legacy Laureate of the University of Pittsburgh, and is the 2011 recipient of the Paul Evan Peters Award from the Coalition for Networked Information, Association for Research Libraries, and EDUCAUSE. The award recognizes notable, lasting achievements in the creation and innovative use of information resources and services that advance scholarship and intellectual productivity through communication networks. She is also the 2011 recipient of the Research in Information Science Award from the American Association of Information Science and Technology. In 2013, she became a fellow of the Association for Computing Machinery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Willinsky</span> Canadian educator and activist

John Willinsky is a Canadian educator, activist, and author. Willinsky is currently on the faculty of the Stanford Graduate School of Education where he is the Khosla Family Professor. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and directs the Public Knowledge Project.

Scholarly communication involves the creation, publication, dissemination and discovery of academic research, primarily in peer-reviewed journals and books. It is “the system through which research and other scholarly writings are created, evaluated for quality, disseminated to the scholarly community, and preserved for future use." This primarily involves the publication of peer-reviewed academic journals, books and conference papers.

George Peter Lyman was an American professor of information science who taught at the University of California, Berkeley School of Information, and was well known in U.S. academia for his research on online information and his leadership in remaking university library systems for the digital era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Information Society Project</span>

The Information Society Project (ISP) at Yale Law School is an intellectual center studying the implications of the Internet and new information technologies for law and society. The ISP was founded in 1997 by Jack Balkin, Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment at Yale Law School. Jack Balkin is the director of the ISP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James G. Neal</span>

James G. Neal is an American librarian, library administrator, and a prominent figure in American and international library associations. In 2022 President Joe Biden appointed him to the National Museum and Library Services Board which advises the agency on general policies with respect to the duties, powers, and authority of the Institute of Museum and Library Services relating to museum, library, and information services, as well as the annual selection of the National Medal for Museum and Library Service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plagiarism</span> Using another authors work as if it was ones own original work

Plagiarism is the representation of another person's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one's own original work. Although precise definitions vary depending on the institution, in many countries and cultures plagiarism is considered a violation of academic integrity and journalistic ethics, as well as social norms around learning, teaching, research, fairness, respect, and responsibility. As such, a person or entity that is determined to have committed plagiarism is often subject to various punishments or sanctions, such as suspension, expulsion from school or work, fines, imprisonment, and other penalties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William F. Ekstrom Library</span>

The William F. Ekstrom Library is the main branch of the University of Louisville Libraries system. Located on the university's Belknap Campus in Louisville, Kentucky, Ekstrom Library contains collections in the humanities, sciences, and social sciences. The University of Louisville Libraries is a member of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) and, along with Ekstrom, includes libraries for Art, Health Sciences, Law, and Music, as well as the Archives and Special Collections. The University of Louisville Libraries hold approximately 2.2 million print volumes, subscribe to several thousand serials, and provide full-text electronic access to approximately 74,000 journals. Ekstrom is a Federal Depository Library and houses the largest selective government document collection in Kentucky.

An open-access mandate is a policy adopted by a research institution, research funder, or government which requires or recommends researchers—usually university faculty or research staff and/or research grant recipients—to make their published, peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers open access (1) by self-archiving their final, peer-reviewed drafts in a freely accessible institutional repository or disciplinary repository or (2) by publishing them in an open-access journal or both.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Institute for Information, Telecommunication and Media Law</span>

Institute for Information, Telecommunication and Media Law or ITM is a research & educational organisation located in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany. All major research projects conducted by ITM are ordered by European Commission. Scientific Council of the Institute is presented by Prof. Dr.Dr. Gunnar Bender, Wilhelm Berneke, Jon Bing, Santiago Cavanillas, Herbert Fiedler, Heinz Lothar Grob, Fritjof Haft, Bernt Hugenholtz, Hans Jarass, Wolfgang Kilian, Miriam Meckel, Ernst-Joachim Mestmäcker, Ursula Nelles and other prominent scientists.

The Center for Digital Research and Scholarship (CDRS) at Columbia University was a unit of the University Libraries that partnered with researchers and scholars at Columbia to share their research broadly with the world. Using innovative new media and digital technologies, CDRS sought to empower the Columbia research community with online tools and services to enable them to make the most of scholarly communication, collaboration, data sharing, and preservation. CDRS was part of Columbia University Libraries/Information Services (CUL/IS).

A copyright transfer agreement or copyright assignment agreement is an agreement that transfers the copyright for a work from the copyright owner to another party. This is one legal option for publishers and authors of books, magazines, movies, television shows, video games, and other commercial artistic works who want to include and use a work of a second creator: for example, a video game developer who wants to pay an artist to draw a boss to include in a game. Another option is to license the right to include and use the work, rather than transferring the copyright.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caroline Haythornthwaite</span>

Caroline Haythornthwaite is a professor emerita at Syracuse University School of Information Studies. She served as the School's director of the Library Science graduate program from July 2017 to June 2019. She previously served as Director and Professor at the Library, Archival and Information Studies, School of SLAIS, at The iSchool at The University of British Columbia (UBC). Her research areas explore the way interaction, via computer media, supports and affects work, learning, and social interaction, primarily from a social-network-analysis perspective. Previously, during 1996–2010, at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), Haythornthwaite had worked as assistant professor, associate, or full professor in the Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patricia Aufderheide</span> American public intellectual

Patricia Ann Aufderheide is a scholar and public intellectual on media and social change, and an expert on fair use in media creation and scholarship. She is a University Professor at American University in Washington, D.C., where she has worked since 1989 and directed the Center for Social Media, later the Center for Media & Social Impact, beginning in 2000. She has received multiple awards and honors for her journalism and scholarship, including the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Fellowship in 1994, and a Fulbright Research Fellowship in 1995, and a Distinguished Career Award in 2008 from the International Digital Media and Arts Association.

Renee Hobbs is an American scholar and educator who works in the field of media literacy education. She is Professor of Communication Studies at the Harrington School of Communication and Media,University of Rhode Island and founder of the Media Education Lab.

References

  1. ↑ Rumsey, Abby (July 2011). "New-Model Scholarly Communication: Road Map for Change" (PDF). Scholarly Communication Institute 9. University of Virginia Library. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-04-04. Retrieved 29 March 2019.
  2. ↑ "The Challenges of Digital Scholarship". The Chronicle of Higher Education. 25 January 2012. Retrieved 30 July 2013.
  3. ↑ Hornby, Amanda; Leslie Bussert. "Digital scholarship and scholarly communication" (PDF). University of Washington Libraries. Retrieved 30 July 2013.
  4. ↑ Andersen, D.L.; Trinkle, D. (2004). D. Andersen; M.E. Sharpe (eds.). "Valuing digital scholarship in the tenure, promotion, and review process – a survey of academic historians". Digital Scholarship in the Tenure, Promotion and Review Process. London: 61–77.
  5. ↑ Ayers, Edward (2004). "Doing scholarship on the web: ten years of triumphs – and a disappointment". Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 35 (3): 143–147. doi:10.3138/jsp.35.3.143.
  6. ↑ Ayers, Ed (2013). "Does Digital Scholarship Have a Future?". Educause.
  7. ↑ Weller, Martin (2011). The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Scholarly Practice. A&C Black.
  8. ↑ Christine L. Borgman. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, Mass. London: MIT Press, 2010.
  9. ↑ McKenzie, Alison, und Lindsey Martin, Hrsg. Developing Digital Scholarship: Emerging Practices in Academic Libraries. London: Facet Publishing, 2016.
  10. ↑ Vinopal, Jennifer, und Monica McCormick. "Supporting Digital Scholarship in Research Libraries: Scalability and Sustainability". Journal of Library Administration 53, Nr. 1 (1. Januar 2013): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.756689.
  11. ↑ Andersen, Deborah Lines. Digital Scholarship in the Tenure, Promotion and Review Process. New York: Routledge, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315705170.
  12. ↑ Costa, Cristina, und Mark Murphy. "Digital Scholarship: Recognizing New Practices in Academia". In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, herausgegeben von Michael Peters, 1–6. Singapore: Springer, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_259-1.
  13. ↑ Hamey, Yvonne. "Developing Digital Scholarship: Emerging Practices in Academic Libraries". Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association 67, Nr. 1 (2 January 2018): 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2018.1429798.
  14. ↑ Murphy, Mark, und Cristina Costa. "Digital scholarship, higher education and the future of the public intellectual". Futures 111 (1 August 2019): 205–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.011.
  15. ↑ Scanlon, Eileen. "Digital Scholarship: Identity, Interdisciplinarity, and Openness". Frontiers in Digital Humanities 5 (2018). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdigh.2018.00003.
  16. ↑ Boyer, Ernest L.; Moser, Drew; Ream, Todd C.; Braxton, John M. (2016) [1990]. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (Expanded ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN   9781118988305. OCLC   920469646.
  17. ↑ Pearce, Nick; Scanlon, Eileen; Weller, Martin; Ashleigh, Melanie. "Digital Scholarship Considered". In Education, p. 35. Archived 2014-03-12 at the Wayback Machine
  18. ↑ Feeney, Mary & Ross, Seamus (1994). "Information Technology in Humanities Scholarship, British Achievements, Prospects, and Barriers". Historical Social Research. 19 (1 (69)): 3–59. JSTOR   20755828.
  19. ↑ Teachers' domain: digital media (including video!) resources for the STEM classroom and collection. 2010. Knowledgeable Quest, 39 (2).
  20. ↑ Ayers, Edward L. "Does Digital Scholarship Have a Future?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 March 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  21. ↑ Ross, Sheri (2012). "Intellectual Property Policies in Academe: Issues and Concerns with Digital Scholarship". Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ross, Sheri V.T. (2012). "Intellectual Property Policies in Academe: Issues and Concerns with Digital Scholarship". Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  23. ↑ Lapin, Lisa (7 June 2011). "Stanford 'disappointed' in Supreme Court ruling in Roche case". Stanford News. Retrieved 20 March 2014.
  24. ↑ "NEA Policy Statement on Digital Learning". National Education Association. Retrieved 2014-03-18.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.