External links
- E. Bruce Brooks Academia site
- E. Bruce Brooks East Asian Languages and Cultures
- E Bruce Brooks Website with list of publications.
- Ernest Bruce Brooks WorldCat
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
E. Bruce Brooks | |
|---|---|
| Born | 1936 |
| Alma mater | Oberlin Conservatory |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Sinology |
E. Bruce Brooks (born 1936) is an American Sinologist, Research Professor of Chinese, Director, Warring States Project, Adjunct Professor, Asian Languages and Literatures, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and Graduate Faculty, at University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He is known for his revisionist textual studies and translations of pre-Qin philosophical texts, many in collaboration with his wife, A. Taeko Brooks.
The Original Analects (1991) a critical translation of the Analects, the collection of sayings attributed to Confucius, argued that the received text was not written by Confucius himself or by any one later person, but was an "accretion" of oral traditions and written fragments put together by various hands and edited as late as the Han dynasty. One reviewer wrote that the book changed the way that scholars approached these early texts, and was "extraordinary book in many ways," clearly "required reading for anyone concerned with early Confucian thought." [1]
Brooks took a Bachelor's degree from the Oberlin Conservatory of Music in 1958 and a PhD from the University of Washington, Seattle in 1968.
Brooks announced the formation of the Warring States Project, using a form of romanization that he adopted:
The Project's publications fall into three areas: Sinology, Biblical and similar investigations, and poetry, whether in Chinese, Biblical Hebrew, or Homeric Greek. [3]
Brooks and his wife, A. Taeko Brooks, a Research Associate of the Project, [4] developed a revisionist argument over the Confucian text known in English as The Analects, traditionally attributed to Confucius, who lived in the 5th century BCE. The major publication of this project was The Original Analects, published by Columbia University Press in 1998. The Preface pointed out that the text of the Analects that was accepted in imperial China could not be traced directly to Confucius himself but was pieced together several hundred years after his death. They subjected this traditional text to archeological and stylistic tests and concluded that large parts of it were not from Confucius himself. On the other hand, they reasoned that in a society where important texts, traditions, and historical records were transmitted orally, it was also not reasonable to dismiss texts simply because they dated from later times; the later might well contain valid information about events of several hundred years earlier. They further held that the text was not composed by a single person or at a single time, but was an "accretion." [5]
The Original Analects was widely reviewed. The editors of Sino-Platonic Papers wrote that The Original Analects is "one of the most important Sinological works, not only of the twentieth century, but of all time." After the work of "the great Bernhard Karlgren" on historical phonology, they explain, "nobody could ever again look upon the sounds of Middle Sinitic and Old Sinitic as impenetrable and unknowable." Likewise, after Bruce Brooks and A. Taeko Brooks "no one will ever again be able to look at so-called "pre-Ch'in (or pre-Han) texts" as monolithic and unproblematic." [6] A revolutionary work will be questioned and not all findings will find acceptance, but "even if the Brookses may be shown to have erred in certain details, their overall conclusions about the Analects will stand the test of time and, in any event, have already shaken Chinese Studies to the core. [7]
Edward Slingerland wrote that it was an "extraordinary book in many ways," clearly "required reading for anyone concerned with early Confucian thought." He added, however, that it "fails to substantiate most of its more radical claims," and finds its translations "awkward yet etymologically precise...." Slingerland particularly objected to the discounting philosophical views that might account for how the text was developed, preferring political explanations. He praised the richness of their commentaries, making it an "invaluable sourcebook for students of the text." [1] Brooks' reply was to offer further arguments and archeological evidence. [8]
Robert Eno wrote that The Original Analects is an "impressive reinterpretation of the structure and history" of the Lunyu, and that he was a proponent of the accretion theory, but that the book did not define the term "accretion" or describe the range of "textual phenomena" and "analytic tactics" entailed in such a theory. [9]
John Makeham published an extensive review in China Review International [10]
Brooks participates in the Alpha Project, which argues that "Another world event is the emergence of Christianity out of Judaism in the 1st century. Approached with the same standard methods, the source texts reveal a situation which has long been suspected: the existence of a pre-Pauline form of Christianity which we call Alpha. Project research is further elucidating this earliest Christianity."
The Warring States Projects maintains a website with subpages.
The Summary page contains Notes on Method, Texts, of The Major Pre-Imperial Texts.
Sinological Profiles, published online in the Reference Section of the Warring States Project, contains encyclopedia-length essays on some three dozen sinologists. They have "not been systematically chosen, but have chosen themselves through personal contact or through reading".
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
