Economic Security Project

Last updated
Economic Security Project
Company type Nonprofit organization
Founded2016
Key people
Natalie Foster

Chris Hughes

Aisha Nyandoro

Dorian Warren

Felicia Wong
Website https://www.economicsecurityproject.org/

Economic Security Project (ESP) is an American progressive non-profit organization focused on economic issues, primarily guaranteed income and antimonopoly action. [1] Founded in 2016 with the aim to "make our economy work again for all Americans," [2] ESP has provided seed funding and organizational support for guaranteed income pilot projects across the country, and has advocated for the expansion of cash tax credits and for more robust antimonopoly action. Their efforts have contributed to the increased visibility and political viability of guaranteed income. [3] Since its founding, ESP has helped to set in motion over 100 guaranteed income pilots, whereas there had been only 12 pilots at the time of its founding. [4]

Contents

The Economic Security Project has solicited bids for paid editors on Wikipedia. [5]

History and overview

Economic Security Project works by convening and organizing other philanthropists and non-profit organizations around its mission of creating a more equitable economy, [6] while also giving grants [7] and campaigning in support of a guaranteed income and anti-monopoly action. The organization was founded in 2016 by Chris Hughes, Dorian Warren, and Natalie Foster. [6] Chris Hughes is a co-founder of Facebook and founder of Jumo. Dorian Warren is the co-President of Community Change, as well as a scholar and organizer. Natalie Foster is an Aspen Institute Fellow and an organizer and was a co-founder of Rebuild The Dream and Digital Director at Organizing for America. [8] Signatories of the organization's initial statement of belief included Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, Black Lives Matter co-founder Alicia Garza, and Alaska State Senator Bill Wielechowski. [9]

When the organization was founded, its goal was to "research, experiment, and inspire others to think through how best to design cash programs." [10] That mission came to include doing issues advocacy and providing seed funding. ESP successfully collaborated with local government officials and local nonprofits to conduct guaranteed income pilot programs such as the SEED program and Magnolia Mother's Trust. The organization was pivotal in expanding the Child Tax Credit during the pandemic. ESP Founder Chris Hughes published an op-ed in the New York Times titled It's Time to Break Up Facebook, which helped launch ESP's Antimonopoly Fund providing seed funding to anti-monopoly organizations. [11]

In an opinion piece in The New York Times , Farhad Manjoo wrote: "One of the main backers of guaranteed income is the Economic Security Project [...] The Economic Security Project has also been a leading political champion of the expanded Child Tax Credit. The group says that both developments — its experience with pilot projects running so far and the success of the expanded Child Tax Credit — are helping to prove a fundamental idea: Giving people money works." [12]

Initiatives

Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration

The Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration (SEED) was a two-year-long guaranteed income pilot program in Stockton, CA that paid 125 participants $500 a month, starting in February 2019. [13] [14] This was the first ever mayor-led [15] guaranteed income initiative, spearheaded by Michael Tubbs. Economic Security Project funded the project with an initial $1 million grant. [16] [17] [18] No public funds were used. Participants were selected based on their annual income; they had to be at or below the city's annual median household income to qualify. [19] Originally intended to be an 18-month-long program, the program was extended for six additional months to help recipients whether the COVID-19 pandemic and to study the effects of the additional cash during that time period. [20]

Research [21] by Stacia West and Amy Baker on the impacts of the guaranteed income payments showed that recipients were more likely to find work than the control group, [22] showed less depression and anxiety, experienced less income volatility, and were more likely to engage in goal-setting and risk-taking. [23]

Magnolia Mother's Trust

The Magnolia Mother's Trust is an ongoing guaranteed income program in Jackson, Mississippi administered by Springboard to Opportunities, led by CEO Aisha Nyandoro. [24] Funded entirely through philanthropic donations, [25] with some of its funding provided by Economic Security Project, [26] The Magnolia Mother's Trust began in December of 2018 and initially offered $1,000 a month for 12 months to a group of 20 Black mothers living in public housing. [27] [28] The program was expanded to include 110 mothers in March 2020, and served 100 mothers in April 2021. [29] Surveys of participants show that the cash helped the recipients achieve their educational goals, provide more resources for the education of their children, and spend more time with their families. [30] [31]

Cost-of-Living Refund

The Cost-of-Living Refund is an Economic Security Project plan to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), using the tax code to provide an income floor to families earning under $75,000. [32] It would expand the size of the tax credit and pay it monthly. [33] A significant feature of this plan would be to expand the definition of work to include college students and caregivers [34] of children, the sick, disabled and elderly, thus qualifying more people to receive a tax credit traditionally reserved for waged employment. Economic Security Project's approach was incorporated into several proposed but unpassed Congressional bills, [35] including then-Senator Kamala Harris' LIFT Act [36] in 2018, [37] Rep. Rashida Talib's BOOST Act, and the Worker Relief and Credit Reform Act by Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman. [38] This proposal was expanded up through Guaranteed Income for the 21st Century, [39] a paper by Economist Darrick Hamilton and others. This plan would guarantee a $12,500 annual income for every adult and a $4,500 allowance for every child. [39]

Emergency Money To The People

Responding to the mass unemployment and economic downturn of the COVID-19 pandemic, Economic Security Project advocated for direct cash stimulus policies to lift 12 million Americans out of poverty. [40] One iteration of Emergency Money to the People would provide $750 per adult and $250 per child quarterly until the unemployment rate fell below 5.5%. The Emergency Money for the People Act, proposed by Representatives Ro Khanna and Tim Ryan, would provide $2,000 monthly payments for 6-12 months. [41]  A petition sponsored by Economic Security Project advocating for monthly $2,000 checks received nearly 3 million signatures in support. [42]

Antimonopoly Fund

In October of 2019, Economic Security Project launched its $10 million Antimonopoly Fund with the Omidyar Network and Open Society Foundations. [43] The fund was invested in organizations working to curb monopoly power throughout the economy, including the agricultural and pharmaceutical sectors.

In a 2020 interview on Amanpour & Co., Hughes elaborated on the intentions of the Antimonopoly Fund: "The fewer companies you have, the more power they have and the more that their voice is heard in the halls of government, and the more that they're able to shape policy on their behalf. And so what we have seen, even now, or particularly now, is the growth of this power. And good institutions, like the Department of Justice and the FTC, have, in some cases, taken a step back and not taken on their regulatory duties as a result of this pronounced power." [44]

In June 2021, the Open Markets Institute, a grantee of the Antimonopoly Fund, saw their former legal director, Lina Khan, confirmed as Chair of the Federal Trade Commission. [45]

Cash Tax Credits

Economic Security Project helped enact the 2021 expansion of the Federal Child Tax Credit, providing regular monthly payments to all families with children, effectively creating a guaranteed income for children. [46] The expanded credit led to a 46% decline in child poverty, [47] lifted 3.7 million children out of poverty [48] and resulted in a 25% immediate drop in food insufficiency rates among low income households. [49] [50] Ultimately, Congress failed to extend or renew the expanded Child Tax Credit. ESP has now shifted to a long-term campaign to renew the expanded Child Tax Credit. ESP also works to expand state-level tax credits to deliver regular cash payments to families and to create models for national legislation. [3]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizen's dividend</span> Georgist proposed policy

Citizen's dividend is a proposed policy based upon the Georgist principle that the natural world is the common property of all people. It is proposed that all citizens receive regular payments (dividends) from revenue raised by leasing or taxing the monopoly of valuable land and other natural resources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Welfare</span> Means-oriented social benefit

Welfare, or commonly social welfare, is a type of government support intended to ensure that members of a society can meet basic human needs such as food and shelter. Social security may either be synonymous with welfare, or refer specifically to social insurance programs which provide support only to those who have previously contributed, as opposed to social assistance programs which provide support on the basis of need alone. The International Labour Organization defines social security as covering support for those in old age, support for the maintenance of children, medical treatment, parental and sick leave, unemployment and disability benefits, and support for sufferers of occupational injury.

Welfare reform is the process of proposing and adopting changes to a welfare system in order to improve the efficiency and administration of government assistance programs with the goal of enhancing equity and fairness for both welfare recipients and taxpayers. Reform programs have various aims: empowering individuals to help them become self-sufficient, ensuring the sustainability and solvency of various welfare programs, and/or promoting equitable distribution of resources. Welfare reform is constantly debated because of the varying opinions on a government's need to balance the imperatives of guaranteeing welfare benefits and promoting self-sufficiency.

Guaranteed minimum income (GMI), also called minimum income, is a social-welfare system that guarantees all citizens or families an income sufficient to live on, provided that certain eligibility conditions are met, typically: citizenship and that the person in question does not already receive a minimum level of income to live on.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poverty in the United States</span>

In the United States, poverty has both social and political implications. In 2020, there were 37.2 million people in poverty. Some of the many causes include income, inequality, inflation, unemployment, debt traps and poor education. The majority of adults living in poverty are employed and have at least a high school education. Although the US is a relatively wealthy country by international standards, it has a persistently high poverty rate compared to other developed countries due in part to a less generous welfare system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Negative income tax</span> Proposed tax reform

In economics, a negative income tax (NIT) is a system which reverses the direction in which tax is paid for incomes below a certain level; in other words, earners above that level pay money to the state while earners below it receive money, as shown by the blue arrows in the diagram. NIT was proposed by Juliet Rhys-Williams while working on the Beveridge Report in the early 1940s and popularized by Milton Friedman in the 1960s as a system in which the state makes payments to the poor when their income falls below a threshold, while taxing them on income above that threshold. Together with Friedman, supporters of NIT also included James Tobin, Joseph A. Pechman, and Peter M. Mieszkowski, Jim Gray and even then-President Richard Nixon, who suggested implementation of modified NIT in his Family Assistance Plan. After the increase in popularity of NIT, an experiment sponsored by the US government was conducted between 1968 and 1982 on effects of NIT on labour supply, income, and substitution effects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social programs in the United States</span> Overview of social programs in the United States of America

The United States spends approximately $2.3 trillion on federal and state social programs including cash assistance, health insurance, food assistance, housing subsidies, energy and utilities subsidies, and education and childcare assistance. Similar benefits are sometimes provided by the private sector either through policy mandates or on a voluntary basis. Employer-sponsored health insurance is an example of this.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009</span> Stimulus package

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), nicknamed the Recovery Act, was a stimulus package enacted by the 111th U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama in February 2009. Developed in response to the Great Recession, the primary objective of this federal statute was to save existing jobs and create new ones as soon as possible. Other objectives were to provide temporary relief programs for those most affected by the recession and invest in infrastructure, education, health, and renewable energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Universal basic income</span> Welfare system of unconditional income

Universal basic income (UBI) is a social welfare proposal in which all citizens of a given population regularly receive a minimum income in the form of an unconditional transfer payment, i.e., without a means test or need to work. In contrast a guaranteed minimum income is paid only to those who do not already receive an income that is enough to live on. A UBI would be received independently of any other income. If the level is sufficient to meet a person's basic needs, it is sometimes called a full basic income; if it is less than that amount, it may be called a partial basic income. As of 2024, no country has implemented a full UBI system, but two countries—Mongolia and Iran—have had a partial UBI in the past. There have been numerous pilot projects, and the idea is discussed in many countries. Some have labelled UBI as utopian due to its historical origin.

According to the International Labour Organization, social security is a human right that aims at reducing and preventing poverty and vulnerability throughout the life cycle of individuals. Social security includes different kinds of benefits A social pension is a stream of payments from the state to an individual that starts when someone retires and continues to be paid until death. This type of pension represents the non-contributory part of the pension system, the other being the contributory pension, as per the most common form of composition of these systems in most developed countries.

Welfare dependency is the state in which a person or household is reliant on government welfare benefits for their income for a prolonged period of time, and without which they would not be able to meet the expenses of daily living. The United States Department of Health and Human Services defines welfare dependency as the proportion of all individuals in families which receive more than 50 percent of their total annual income from Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), food stamps, and/or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. Typically viewed as a social problem, it has been the subject of major welfare reform efforts since the mid-20th century, primarily focused on trying to make recipients self-sufficient through paid work. While the term "welfare dependency" can be used pejoratively, for the purposes of this article it shall be used to indicate a particular situation of persistent poverty.

Universal basic income in India refers to the debate and practical experiments with universal basic income (UBI) in India. The greatest impetus has come from the 40-page chapter on UBI that the Economic Survey of India published in January 2017. It outlined the three themes of a proposed UBI programme:

Universal basic income in Canada refers to the debate and trials with basic income, negative income tax and related welfare systems in Canada. The debate goes back to the 1930s when the social credit movement had ideas around those lines. Two major basic income experiments have been conducted in Canada. Firstly the Mincome experiment in Manitoba 1974–1979, and secondly the Ontario Basic Income Pilot Project in 2017. The latter was intended to last for three years but only lasted a few months due to its subsequent cancellation by the then newly-elected Conservative government.

Universal basic income is a subject of much interest in the United Kingdom. There is a long history of discussion yet it has not been implemented to date. Interest in and support for universal basic income has increased substantially amongst the public and politicians in recent years.

Universal basic income (UBI) is discussed in many countries. This article summarizes the national and regional debates, where it takes place, and is a complement to the main article on the subject: universal basic income.

Universal basic income pilots are smaller-scale preliminary experiments which are carried out on selected members of the relevant population to assess the feasibility, costs and effects of the full-scale implementation of universal basic income, or the related concept of negative income tax (NIT), including partial universal basic income and similar programs. The following list provides an overview of the most famous universal basic income pilots, including projects which have not been launched yet but have been already approved by the respective political bodies or for the negotiations are in process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Tubbs</span> American politician (born 1990)

Michael Derrick Tubbs is an American politician who is currently serving as a special adviser for economic mobility and opportunity for Governor Gavin Newsom. A member of the Democratic Party, he previously served as the 79th mayor of Stockton, California from 2017 to 2021, and as a member of the Stockton City Council from the 6th District from 2013 until 2017.

Universal basic income and negative income tax, which is a related system, has been debated in the United States since the 1960s, and to a smaller extent also before that. During the 1960s and 1970s a number of experiments with negative income tax were conducted in United States and Canada. In the 1970s another and somewhat related welfare system was introduced instead, the Earned Income Tax Credit. The next big development in the history of basic income in the United States came in 1982, when the Alaska Permanent Fund was established. It has delivered some kind of basic income, financed from the state's oil and gas revenues, ever since.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CARES Act</span> COVID-19 stimulus in the United States

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, also known as the CARES Act, is a $2.2 trillion economic stimulus bill passed by the 116th U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump on March 27, 2020, in response to the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. The spending primarily includes $300 billion in one-time cash payments to individual people who submit a tax return in America, $260 billion in increased unemployment benefits, the creation of the Paycheck Protection Program that provides forgivable loans to small businesses with an initial $350 billion in funding, $500 billion in loans for corporations, and $339.8 billion to state and local governments.

The United States federal child tax credit (CTC) is a partially-refundable tax credit for parents with dependent children. It provides $2,000 in tax relief per qualifying child, with up to $1,400 of that refundable (subject to a refundability threshold, phase-in and phase-out). In 2021, following the passage of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, it was temporarily raised to $3,600 per child under the age of 6 and $3,000 per child between the ages of 6 and 17; it was also made fully-refundable and half was paid out as monthly benefits. This reverted back to the previous in 2022. The CTC is scheduled to revert to a $1,000 credit after 2025.

References

  1. ↑ "Guaranteed income program helps single mother make ends meet". www.cbsnews.com. Retrieved 12 May 2023.
  2. ↑ "Would a universal basic income fix US economic inequality? One group is spending $10 million to find out". Quartz. 2016-12-08. Retrieved 2023-04-03.
  3. 1 2 Ramirez, Martha. "How the Economic Security Project Is Rallying Funders to Support Guaranteed Income". Inside Philanthropy. Retrieved 2023-04-13.
  4. ↑ Lab, The Stanford Basic Income. "Global Map of Basic Income Experiments | Stanford Basic Income Lab". The Stanford Basic Income Lab. Retrieved 2023-04-03.
  5. ↑ "Wikipedia page editor and creator". 2023-02-22. Archived from the original on 2023-02-22.
  6. 1 2 Matthews, Dylan (2020-01-15). "Chris Hughes wants another chance". Vox. Retrieved 2023-04-08.
  7. ↑ "Anti-Monopoly Fund Funnels $1 Million into Antitrust Efforts". Bloomberg.com. 2020-07-27. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  8. ↑ "Natalie Foster".
  9. ↑ Hughes, Chris (2016-12-09). "Statement of Belief, signed by 100+ leaders". Medium. Retrieved 2023-04-08.
  10. ↑ Hughes, Chris (9 December 2016). "Statement of Belief, signed by 100+ leaders". Medium.
  11. ↑ Hughes, Chris (9 May 2019). "It's Time to Break Up Facebook". The New York Times.
  12. ↑ Manjoo, Farhad (23 September 2022). "Biden Has Helped the Quiet Revolution of Giving People Money". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 April 2023.
  13. ↑ "SEED". SEED. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  14. ↑ "Will 'basic income' become the California norm? Stockton starts $500 no-strings payments". sacbee.
  15. ↑ Ghuman, Umar (2022-12-01). "A Policy Review of the SEED (Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration) Project: Is the Devil in the Details?". International Journal of Community Well-Being. 5 (4): 819–830. doi:10.1007/s42413-021-00145-3. ISSN   2524-5309. PMC   9469043 . PMID   36118591.
  16. ↑ Goodman, Peter S. (2018-05-30). "Free Cash to Fight Income Inequality? California City Is First in U.S. to Try". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-04-15.
  17. ↑ "Cash payments spread from Congress to Stockton to Brazil — but notion of 'universal basic income' far from reality". Washington Post.
  18. ↑ "Universal basic income is here—it just looks different from what you expected". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  19. ↑ "California Program Giving $500 No-Strings-Attached Stipends Pays Off, Study Finds". NPR.org.
  20. ↑ "Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration Extended to January 2021". markets.businessinsider.com. Retrieved 2023-04-15.
  21. ↑ "SEED report" (PDF). squarespace.com.
  22. ↑ "The Biggest Payoff From Stockton's Basic Income Program: Jobs". Bloomberg.com. 2021-03-05. Retrieved 2023-04-15.
  23. ↑ "Self-Determination". SEED. Retrieved 2023-04-15.
  24. ↑ "Aisha Nyandoro | Aspen Ideas". Aspen Ideas Festival.
  25. ↑ Abello, Oscar Perry (2021-04-01). "Guaranteed Income in Mississippi Designed By Black Moms for Black Moms, Showing Results for Black Moms". Ms. Magazine.
  26. ↑ "They Gave Black Mothers in Mississippi $1,000 a Month. It Changed Their Lives". The New Republic. 2021-10-12. ISSN   0028-6583.
  27. ↑ Clifford, Catherine. "Facebook co-founder helps give 20 struggling moms in Mississippi $1,000 a month free cash". CNBC. Retrieved 2023-04-15.
  28. ↑ Kotecki, Peter. "A basic income pilot in Mississippi will provide 15 black mothers with $1,000 for free every month, and it could lead to a much bigger experiment". Business Insider. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  29. ↑ "The Magnolia Mother's Trust". Springboard to Opportunities. Retrieved 2023-04-15.
  30. ↑ "2020 Evaluation Report" (PDF).
  31. ↑ "Front and Center". Ms. Magazine. 2021-04-14. Retrieved 2023-04-15.
  32. ↑ "Why Stay At Home Parents Deserve to Get Paid". Fatherly.
  33. ↑ Matthews, Dylan (2019-07-15). "Parenting can be a full-time job. Activists want the tax code to treat it that way". Vox. Retrieved 2023-04-15.
  34. ↑ "Policy Tools to Fight Poverty and the Rising Cost of Living". Spotlight on Poverty and Opportunity. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  35. ↑ Matthews, Dylan (2020-10-07). "Joe Biden and Kamala Harris's proposals could cut poverty in half". Vox.
  36. ↑ Matthews, Dylan (2018-10-19). "Kamala Harris's new basic income-style bill is so frustratingly close to being great". Vox. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
  37. ↑ Stevens, Matt (2019-06-28). "Kamala Harris on the LIFT Act". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-04-23.
  38. ↑ "H.R.5271 - WRCR Act of 2019". Congress.gov.
  39. 1 2 "Projects and Papers | Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy | The New School". www.newschool.edu. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
  40. ↑ "Fourth stimulus check in jeopardy as payments dwindle". Yahoo Finance. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
  41. ↑ Guina, Ryan. "Will The $2,000 Monthly Stimulus Check Proposal Save Our Economy?". Forbes. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
  42. ↑ Fink, Jenni (2021-06-25). "Petition for $2,000 Monthly Stimulus Checks Only 670K Signatures From Goal". Newsweek. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
  43. ↑ "Facebook co-founder and critic Chris Hughes spearheads a $10 million 'anti-monopoly' fund". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2023-04-23.
  44. ↑ wittel. "Facebook Co-Founder Chris Hughes Talks Corporate Monopolies". Amanpour & Company. Retrieved 2023-04-24.
  45. ↑ "Lina Khan's Confirmation as Commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission is Momentous". Open Markets Institute. Retrieved 2023-04-24.
  46. ↑ DeParle, Jason (2021-03-07). "In the Stimulus Bill, a Policy Revolution in Aid for Children". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-04-24.
  47. ↑ Bureau, US Census. "Expansions to Child Tax Credit Contributed to 46% Decline in Child Poverty Since 2020". Census.gov. Retrieved 2023-04-24.
  48. ↑ Grinstein-Weiss, Leah Hamilton, Stephen Roll, Mathieu Despard, Elaine Maag, Yung Chun, Laura Brugger, and Michal (2022-04-13). "The impacts of the 2021 expanded child tax credit on family employment, nutrition, and financial well-being". Brookings. Retrieved 2023-04-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  49. ↑ "The Initial Effects of the Expanded Child Tax Credit on Material Hardship". Columbia University Center on Poverty and Social Policy. Retrieved 2023-04-24.
  50. ↑ "The impacts of the 2021 expanded child tax credit on family employment, nutrition, and financial well-being:" (PDF). brookings.edu.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.