Federal Trade Commission

Last updated

Federal Trade Commission
Seal of the United States Federal Trade Commission.svg
Seal of the Federal Trade Commission
Flag of the United States Federal Trade Commission.svg
Flag of the Federal Trade Commission
Agency overview
FormedSeptember 26, 1914;110 years ago (1914-09-26)
Preceding agency
Jurisdiction Federal government of the United States
Headquarters Federal Trade Commission Building
Washington, DC
Employees1,123 (FY 2021) [1]
Annual budget$425.7 million (FY 2024) [2]
Agency executive
Website ftc.gov
Footnotes
[3] [4]

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is an independent agency of the United States government whose principal mission is the enforcement of civil (non-criminal) antitrust law and the promotion of consumer protection. The FTC shares jurisdiction over federal civil antitrust law enforcement with the Department of Justice Antitrust Division. The agency is headquartered in the Federal Trade Commission Building in Washington, DC.

Contents

The FTC was established in 1914 by the Federal Trade Commission Act, which was passed in response to the 19th-century monopolistic trust crisis. Since its inception, the FTC has enforced the provisions of the Clayton Act, a key U.S. antitrust statute, as well as the provisions of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.   § 41 et seq. Over time, the FTC has been delegated with the enforcement of additional business regulation statutes and has promulgated a number of regulations (codified in Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations). The broad statutory authority granted to the FTC provides it with more surveillance and monitoring abilities than it actually uses. [5]

The FTC is composed of five commissioners who are nominated by the President and subject to Senate confirmation. Commissioners serve seven-year terms, and no more than three FTC members can be from the same party. One member of the body serves as FTC Chair at the President's pleasure, with Commissioner Lina Khan having served as chair since June 2021.

History

Early history

In the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States in 1911, [6] the first version of a bill to establish a commission to regulate interstate trade was introduced on January 25, 1912, by Oklahoma congressman Dick Thompson Morgan. He would make the first speech on the House floor advocating its creation on February 21, 1912.

Though the initial bill did not pass, the questions of trusts and antitrust dominated the 1912 election. [7] Most political party platforms in 1912 endorsed the establishment of a federal trade commission with its regulatory powers placed in the hands of an administrative board, as an alternative to functions previously and necessarily exercised so slowly through the courts. [8] [9]

With the 1912 presidential election decided in favor of the Democrats and Woodrow Wilson, Morgan reintroduced a slightly amended version of his bill during the April 1913 special session. The national debate culminated in Wilson's signing of the FTC Act on September 26, 1914, with additional tightening of regulations in the Clayton Antitrust Act three weeks later.

The new FTC would absorb the staff and duties of Bureau of Corporations, previously established under the Department of Commerce and Labor in 1903. The FTC could additionally challenge "unfair methods of competition" and enforce the Clayton Act's more specific prohibitions against certain price discrimination, vertical arrangements, interlocking directorates, and stock acquisitions. [7] [ non-primary source needed ]

Recent history

In 1984, [10] [ non-primary source needed ] the FTC began to regulate the funeral home industry in order to protect consumers from deceptive practices. The FTC Funeral Rule requires funeral homes to provide all customers (and potential customers) with a General Price List (GPL), specifically outlining goods and services in the funeral industry, as defined by the FTC, and a listing of their prices. [11] [ non-primary source needed ] By law, the GPL must be presented on request to all individuals, and no one is to be denied a written, retainable copy of the GPL. In 1996, the FTC instituted the Funeral Rule Offenders Program (FROP), under which "funeral homes make a voluntary payment to the U.S. Treasury or appropriate state fund for an amount less than what would likely be sought if the Commission authorized filing a lawsuit for civil penalties. In addition, the funeral homes participate in the NFDA compliance program, which includes a review of the price lists, on-site training of the staff, and follow-up testing and certification on compliance with the Funeral Rule." [10] [ non-primary source needed ]

In the mid-1990s, the FTC launched the fraud sweeps concept where the agency and its federal, state, and local partners filed simultaneous legal actions against multiple telemarketing fraud targets. The first sweeps operation was Project Telesweep in July 1995 which cracked down on 100 business opportunity scams. [12] [ non-primary source needed ]

In the 2021 United States Supreme Court case, AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC , the Court found unanimously that the FTC did not have power under 15 U.S.C.   § 53(b) of the FTC Act, amended in 1973, to seek equitable relief in courts; it had the power to seek only injunctive relief. [13]

In 2023, Project 2025 suggested that an administration could abolish the FTC. [14]

Notable recent work

Biden administration

Google

In November 2024, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta agreed with Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter and FTC Chair Khan, ruling the company a monopoly, and ordering Google to sell its Chrome web browser. [15]

Banning non-compete clauses

The FTC ruled to ban virtually all non-competes nationwide in April 2024. [16] The agency estimates 30 million workers are bound by these clauses and only excludes senior executives from the ban on enforcing non-competes. [16] The agency believes that this will allow workers to find better working conditions and pay, since switching companies, on average, provides the biggest pay raises. [17] It also allows workers to leave abusive work environments and can prevent some doctors from having to leave medicine once they leave a practice. [17] The ban was put on hold by U.S. District Judge Ada Brown on July 3, 2024, but then upheld on appeal by U.S. District Judge Kelley B. Hodge on July 23, 2024. [18] [19] On August 20, 2024, a federal court in Texas overturned the FTC's ban on non-compete agreements, which was originally scheduled to take effect on September 4, 2024. [20] U.S. District Judge Ada Brown said the FTC did not have the authority to issue the ban, which she said was "unreasonably overbroad without a reasonable explanation." [21] Victoria Graham, an FTC spokeswoman responded to the ruling by stating "We are seriously considering a potential appeal..." [22]

Chip manufacturers

The FTC successfully blocked Nvidia from purchasing ARM holdings in 2022. [23]

Pharmaceutical drug prices

The FTC has pursued lawsuits against companies to lower drug prices, [24] including for insulin [25] and for inhalers. [26]

The FTC launched its investigation into pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) in 2022. In July 2024, it released an interim report on its 2-year investigation into pharmacy benefit managers, the agency requested documents from the six largest PBMs as part of its investigation. The three largest – UnitedHealth Group's OptumRx, Cigna's Express Scripts and CVS Health's Caremark – manage about 80% of U.S. prescriptions. The top three PBMs share a parent company with a large medical insurance company. The FTC accused these companies of raising drug prices through conflicts of interest, vertical integration, concentration, and exclusivity provisions; the agency also alleged that the companies created a rebate system that prioritized high rebates from drug manufacturers, among other factors. The agency stated that several PBMs failed to provide documents in a timely manner and warned that it could take the companies to court to force them to comply, during the announcment in the preliminary findings. [27] [28] [29] [30] In September 2024, the FTC sued the three largest pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) for allegedly engaging in anti-competitive practices that increased their profits while artificially inflating the list price of insulin. The agency is seeking to prohibit the PBMs from favoring medicines because certain pharaceuticals make them more money. [31] [32]

Fake Online Reviews

In August 2024, the FTC announced it would finalize rules to ban fake reviews online. [33] [34]

Food prices

In February 2024, the FTC challenged the Kroger-Albertsons merger, arguing it would drive up grocery and pharmacy prices, worsen service, and lower wages and working conditions. [35] [36] On December 10, 2024, U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson agreed with the FTC, that the merger would risk reducing competition at the expense of both consumers and workers. Judge Nelson halted Kroger’s $24.6 billion acquisition of Albertsons with a preliminary injunction. [37]

In March 2024, the FTC released a report that found higher profit margins as a driver of inflation for grocery prices. [38]

In August 2024, it announced it would be probing grocery prices to look for anti-competitive behavior and price gouging at chain supermarkets. [39] [40]

Junk fees and high prices

In 2023, the FTC proposed a new rule that would ensure that the cancellation process of subscription services is as easy as the process of signing up. [41] [42] On October 16, 2024, the FTC announced the new rule, dubbed "click to cancel", requiring companies to make subscription services "as easy for consumers to cancel their enrollment as it was to sign up." [43] [44] Khan said in a interview that the new rule is designed so that if consumers signed up online, they must also be able to cancel on the same website in the same number of steps. [45] The rule’s final provisions will go into effect 180 days after it is published in the Federal Register. [43]

It also targeted airlines and credit card companies over junk fees and high prices. [40]

Microsoft merger

In 2023, the FTC authorized an administrative complaint against the merger between Microsoft and Activision Blizzard, Inc. The FTC alleged the deal would suppress competitors from accessing future content/games developed by Activision once the deal goes through. The FTC dropped its lawsuit on July 20, 2023. Microsoft had to restructure its deal to appease UK regulators. [46] Microsoft reneged on promises it made in court filings by laying off 1900 employees in January 2024, signaling that it did not plan to let Activision Blizzard remain as independent as it had promised and leading the FTC to continue to appeal the decision. [47]

Right to repair

In July 2021, the FTC voted unanimously to enforce the right to repair as policy and to look to take action against companies that limit the type of repair work that can be done at independent repair shops. [48] In October 2024, following a comment by the FTC to the US Copyright Office, an exemption was granted allowing for repair of retail-level food preparation equipment, such as McDonald's ice cream machines. [49] [50]

Trump administration

Meta antitrust acquisitions case

In December 2020 the FTC sued Meta (formally known as Facebook) for anticompetitive conduct under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits improper monopolization of a market. The FTC accused Meta of buying up its competitors to stifle competition which reduced the range of services available to consumers and by creating fewer social media platforms for advertisers to target. [51] [52]

Obama administration

Money Now Funding / Cash4Businesses case

In September 2013, a federal court closed an elusive business opportunity scheme on the request of the FTC, namely "Money Now Funding"/"Cash4Businesses". [53] The FTC alleged that the defendants misrepresented potential earnings, violated the National Do Not Call Register, and violated the FTC's Business Opportunity Rule in preventing a fair consumer evaluation of the business. [54] This was one of the first definitive actions taken by any regulator against a company engaging in transaction laundering, where almost US$6 million were processed illicitly. [55] [56]

In December 2018, two defendants, Nikolas Mihilli and Dynasty Merchants, LLC, settled with the FTC. [57] They were banned from processing credit card transactions, though the initial monetary judgment of $5.8 million was suspended due to the defendant's inability to pay.

OMICS Publishing Group case

In 2016, the FTC launched action against the academic journal publisher OMICS Publishing Group for producing predatory journals and organizing predatory conferences. [58] This action, partly in response to ongoing pressure from the academic community, [59] is the first action taken by the FTC against an academic journal publisher. [60] [61]

The complaint alleges that the defendants have been "deceiving academics and researchers about the nature of its publications and hiding publication fees ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars". [62] It additionally notes that "OMICS regularly advertises conferences featuring academic experts who were never scheduled to appear in order to attract registrants" [59] and that attendees "spend hundreds or thousands of dollars on registration fees and travel costs to attend these scientific conferences." [62] Manuscripts are also sometimes held hostage, with OMICS refusing to allow submissions to be withdrawn and thereby preventing resubmission to another journal for consideration. [60] Library scientist Jeffrey Beall has described OMICS as among the most egregious of predatory publishers. [59] [63] In November 2017, a federal court in the Court for the District of Nevada granted a preliminary injunction that:

"prohibits the defendants from making misrepresentations regarding their academic journals and conferences, including that specific persons are editors of their journals or have agreed to participate in their conferences. It also prohibits the defendants from falsely representing that their journals engage in peer review, that their journals are included in any academic journal indexing service or any measurement of the extent to which their journals are cited. It also requires that the defendants clearly and conspicuously disclose all costs associated with submitting or publishing articles in their journals." [64]

In April 2019, the court imposed a fine of US$50.1 million on OMICS companies for unfair and deceptive business practices. [65] [66] [67]

Sears Holdings case

In In the Matter of Sears Holdings Management Corp. , the FTC alleged that a research software program provided by Sears was deceptive because it collected information about nearly all online behavior, a fact that was only disclosed in legalese, buried within the end user license agreement. [68] The FTC secured a consent decree in the case.

Bush administration

Gateway Learning case

In In re Gateway Learning Corp. the FTC alleged that Gateway committed unfair and deceptive trade practices by making retroactive changes to its privacy policy without informing customers and by violating its own privacy policy by selling customer information when it had said it would not. [69] Gateway settled the complaint by entering into a consent decree with the FTC that required it to surrender some profits and placed restrictions upon Gateway for the following 20 years. [70]

Activities in the healthcare industry

In addition to prospective analysis of the effects of mergers and acquisitions, the FTC has recently resorted to retrospective analysis and monitoring of consolidated hospitals. [71] Thus, it also uses retroactive data to demonstrate that some hospital mergers and acquisitions are hurting consumers, particularly in terms of higher prices. [71] Here are some recent examples of the FTC's success in blocking or unwinding of hospital consolidations or affiliations:

Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital and Palmyra Medical Center in Georgia

In 2011, the FTC successfully challenged in court the $195 million acquisition of Palmyra Medical Center by Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital. [71] [72] The FTC alleged that the transaction would create a monopoly as it would "reduce competition significantly and allow the combined Phoebe/Palmyra to raise prices for general acute-care hospital services charged to commercial health plans, substantially harming patients and local employers and employees". [72] The Supreme Court on February 19, 2013, ruled in favor of the FTC. [72]

ProMedica health system and St. Luke's hospital in Ohio

Similarly, court attempts by ProMedica health system in Ohio to overturn an order by the FTC to the company to unwind its 2010 acquisition of St. Luke's hospital were unsuccessful. [71] [73] The FTC claimed that the acquisition would hurt consumers through higher premiums because insurance companies would be required to pay more. [73] In December 2011, an administrative judge upheld the FTC's decision, noting that the behavior of ProMedica health system and St. Luke's was indeed anticompetitive. The court ordered ProMedica to divest St. Luke's to a buyer that would be approved by the FTC within 180 days of the date of the order. [71] [73]

OSF healthcare system and Rockford Health System in Illinois

In November 2011, the FTC filed a lawsuit alleging that the proposed acquisition of Rockford by OSF would drive up prices for general acute-care inpatient services as OSF would face only one competitor (SwedishAmerican health system) in the Rockford area and would have a market share of 64%. [74] Later in 2012, OSF announced that it had abandoned its plans to acquire Rockford Health System. [74]

Organization

Current members of the FTC

The commission is headed by five commissioners, who each serve seven-year terms. Commissioners are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. No more than three commissioners can be of the same political party. In practice, this means that two commissioners are of the opposition party. However, three members of the FTC throughout its history have been without party affiliation, with the most recent independent, Pamela Jones Harbour, serving from 2003 to 2009. [75]

PortraitNamePartyPrior experienceEducationTerm beganTerm expires
Lina Khan, FTC Chair (cropped).jpg Lina Khan

(chair)

 Democratic Legal scholar Williams College (BA)

Yale Law School (JD)

June 15, 2021September 26, 2024
Rebecca Slaughter (cropped).jpg Rebecca Slaughter Democratic Legal advisor to Senator Chuck Schumer Yale University (BA)

Yale Law School (JD)

May 2, 2018September 26, 2029
Alvaro Bedoya, FTC Commissioner (cropped).jpg Alvaro Bedoya Democratic Director of the Center on Privacy and Technology at the Georgetown University Law Center Harvard College (BA)

Yale Law School (JD)

May 16, 2022September 26, 2026
Melissa Holyoak, FTC Commissioner.jpg Melissa Holyoak Republican Solicitor general of Utah University of Utah (BA)

University of Utah Law School (JD)

March 25, 2024September 26, 2025
Andrew N. Ferguson, FTC Commissioner.jpg Andrew N. Ferguson Republican Solicitor general of Virginia University of Virginia (BA)

University of Virginia School of Law (JD)

April 2, 2024September 26, 2030

Notes

Backgrounds of commissioners

As of 2021, there have been:

Bureaus

How to File a Complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, from the FTC

§The FTC has three main bureaus: the Bureau of Competition, the Bureau of Consumer Protection, and the Bureau of Economics.

Bureau of Competition

The Bureau of Competition is the division of the FTC charged with elimination and prevention of "anticompetitive" business practices. It accomplishes this through the enforcement of antitrust laws, review of proposed mergers, and investigation into other non-merger business practices that may impair competition. Such non-merger practices include horizontal restraints, involving agreements between direct competitors, and vertical restraints, involving agreements among businesses at different levels in the same industry (such as suppliers and commercial buyers).

Apex Building, built in 1938 (FTC headquarters) in Washington, DC The Apex Building, headquarters of the Federal Trade Commission, on Constitution Avenue and 7th Streets in Washington, D.C.jpg
Apex Building, built in 1938 (FTC headquarters) in Washington, DC

The FTC shares enforcement of antitrust laws with the Department of Justice. However, while the FTC is responsible for civil enforcement of antitrust laws, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice has the power to bring both civil and criminal action in antitrust matters.

Bureau of Consumer Protection

The Bureau of Consumer Protection's mandate is to protect consumers against unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce. With the written consent of the commission, Bureau attorneys enforce federal laws related to consumer affairs and rules promulgated by the FTC. Its functions include investigations, enforcement actions, and consumer and business education. Areas of principal concern for this bureau are: advertising and marketing, financial products and practices, telemarketing fraud, privacy and identity protection, etc. The bureau also is responsible for the United States National Do Not Call Registry.

Under the FTC Act, the commission has the authority, in most cases, to bring its actions in federal court through its own attorneys. In some consumer protection matters, the FTC appears with, or supports, the U.S. Department of Justice.

Bureau of Economics

The Bureau of Economics was established to support the Bureau of Competition and Consumer Protection by providing expert knowledge related to the economic impacts of the FTC's legislation and operation.

Other offices

  • The FTC maintains an Office of Technology Research and Investigation to assist it in technology-related enforcement actions. [80]
  • The FTC generally selects its Chief Technologist from among computer science academics and noted practitioners. [81] The role has previously been filled by Steven K. Bellovin, Lorrie Cranor, Edward Felten, Ashkan Soltani, and Latanya Sweeney.
  • The FTC also maintains an academic in residence program, inviting leading legal scholars to join the FTC for a year as a Senior Policy Advisor. The role has been held by Tim Wu in 2011, [82] Paul Ohm in 2012, [83] and Andrea M. Matwyshyn in 2014. [84]

Activities

The FTC investigates issues raised by reports from consumers and businesses, pre-merger notification filings, congressional inquiries, or reports in the media. These issues include, for instance, false advertising and other forms of fraud. FTC investigations may pertain to a single company or an entire industry. If the results of the investigation reveal unlawful conduct, the FTC may seek voluntary compliance by the offending business through a consent order, file an administrative complaint, or initiate federal litigation. During the course of regulatory activities, the FTC is authorized to collect records, but not on-site inspections. [85]

Traditionally an administrative complaint is heard in front of an independent administrative law judge (ALJ) with FTC staff acting as prosecutors. The case is reviewed de novo by the full FTC commission which then may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals and finally to the Supreme Court.[ citation needed ]

Under the FTC Act, the federal courts retain their traditional authority to issue equitable relief, including the appointment of receivers, monitors, the imposition of asset freezes to guard against the spoliation of funds, immediate access to business premises to preserve evidence, and other relief including financial disclosures and expedited discovery. In numerous cases, the FTC employs this authority to combat serious consumer deception or fraud. Additionally, the FTC has rulemaking power to address concerns regarding industry-wide practices. Rules promulgated under this authority are known as Trade Rules.[ citation needed ]

One of the Federal Trade Commission's other major focuses is identity theft. The FTC serves as a federal repository for individual consumer complaints regarding identity theft. Even though the FTC does not resolve individual complaints, it does use the aggregated information to determine where federal action might be taken. The complaint form is available online or by phone (1-877-ID-THEFT).[ citation needed ]

The FTC has been involved in the oversight of the online advertising industry and its practice of behavioral targeting for some time. In 2011 the FTC proposed a "Do Not Track" mechanism to allow Internet users to opt-out of behavioral targeting.[ citation needed ]

The FTC, along with the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Justice also empowers third-party enforcer-firms to engage in some regulatory oversight, e.g. the FTC requires other energy companies to audit offshore oil platform operators. [86]

In 2013, the FTC issued a comprehensive revision of its Green guides, which set forth standards for environmental marketing. [87] [ non-primary source needed ]

Unfair or deceptive practices affecting consumers

Endorsement Guides from the FTC

Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.   § 45 grants the FTC power to investigate and prevent deceptive trade practices. The statute declares that "unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful." [88]

Unfairness and deception towards consumers represent two distinct areas of FTC enforcement and authority. The FTC also has authority over unfair methods of competition between businesses. [89]

Definitions of unfairness

Courts have identified three main factors that must be considered in consumer unfairness cases: (1) whether the practice injures consumers; (2) whether the practice violates established public policy; and (3) whether it is unethical or unscrupulous. [89]

Definitions of deception

In a letter to the Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, the FTC defined the elements of deception cases. First, "there must be a representation, omission or practice that is likely to mislead the consumer." [90] In the case of omissions, the Commission considers the implied representations understood by the consumer.

A misleading omission occurs when information is not disclosed to correct reasonable consumer expectations. [90] Second, the Commission examines the practice from the perspective of a reasonable consumer being targeted by the practice. Finally the representation or omission must be a material one –that is one that would have changed consumer behavior. [90]

Federal Trade Commission entrance doorway in Washington, DC Federal Trade Commission Entrance Doorway.jpg
Federal Trade Commission entrance doorway in Washington, DC
Dot Com Disclosures guide

In its Dot Com Disclosures guide, [91] the FTC said that "disclosures that are required to prevent deception or to provide consumers material information about a transaction must be presented clearly and conspicuously." [91] The FTC suggested a number of different factors that would help determine whether the information was "clear and conspicuous" including but not limited to:

  • the placement of the disclosure in an advertisement and its proximity to the claim it is qualifying,
  • the prominence of the disclosure,
  • whether items in other parts of the advertisement distract attention from the disclosure,
  • whether the advertisement is so lengthy that the disclosure needs to be repeated,
  • whether disclosures in audio messages are presented in an adequate volume and cadence and visual disclosures appear for a sufficient duration, and
  • whether the language of the disclosure is understandable to the intended audience. [91]

However, the "key is the overall net impression." [91]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914</span> 1914 US law establishing the Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 is a United States federal law which established the Federal Trade Commission. The Act was signed into law by US President Woodrow Wilson in 1914 and outlaws unfair methods of competition and unfair acts or practices that affect commerce.

The Robinson–Patman Act (RPA) of 1936 is a United States federal law that prohibits anticompetitive practices by producers, specifically price discrimination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States antitrust law</span> American legal system intended to promote competition among businesses

In the United States, antitrust law is a collection of mostly federal laws that govern the conduct and organization of businesses in order to promote economic competition and prevent unjustified monopolies. The three main U.S. antitrust statutes are the Sherman Act of 1890, the Clayton Act of 1914, and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914. These acts serve three major functions. First, Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits price fixing and the operation of cartels, and prohibits other collusive practices that unreasonably restrain trade. Second, Section 7 of the Clayton Act restricts the mergers and acquisitions of organizations that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. Third, Section 2 of the Sherman Act prohibits monopolization.

Unfair business practices describes a set of practices by businesses which are considered unfair, and which may be unlawful. It includes practices which are covered by other areas of law, such as fraud, misrepresentation, and oppressive or unconscionable contract terms. Protections may be afforded to business-to-business dealings, or may be limited to those dealing as consumers. Regulation of such practices is a departure from traditional views of freedom to agree on contractual terms, summed up in the 1804 French Civil Code as qui dit contractuel dit juste.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fair Debt Collection Practices Act</span> U.S. consumer protection law

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Pub. L. 95-109; 91 Stat. 874, codified as 15 U.S.C. § 1692 –1692p, approved on September 20, 1977, is a consumer protection amendment, establishing legal protection from abusive debt collection practices, to the Consumer Credit Protection Act, as Title VIII of that Act. The statute's stated purposes are: to eliminate abusive practices in the collection of consumer debts, to promote fair debt collection, and to provide consumers with an avenue for disputing and obtaining validation of debt information in order to ensure the information's accuracy. The Act creates guidelines under which debt collectors may conduct business, defines rights of consumers involved with debt collectors, and prescribes penalties and remedies for violations of the Act. It is sometimes used in conjunction with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">False advertising</span> Misleading content in advertisements

False advertising is the act of publishing, transmitting, distributing, or otherwise publicly circulating an advertisement containing a false claim, or statement, made intentionally to promote the sale of property, goods, or services. A false advertisement can be classified as deceptive if the advertiser deliberately misleads the consumer, rather than making an unintentional mistake. A number of governments use regulations or other laws and methods to limit false advertising.

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) was a non-ministerial government department of the United Kingdom, established by the Fair Trading Act 1973, which enforced both consumer protection and competition law, acting as the United Kingdom's economic regulator. The intention was for the OFT to make markets work well for consumers, ensuring vigorous competition between fair-dealing businesses and prohibiting unfair practices such as rogue trading, scams, and cartels. Its role was modified and its powers changed by the Enterprise Act 2002.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christine A. Varney</span> American lawyer (born 1955)

Christine A. Varney is an American antitrust attorney who served as the U.S. assistant attorney general of the Antitrust Division for the Obama administration and as a Federal Trade commissioner in the Clinton administration. Since August 2011, Varney has been a partner of the New York law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore, where she chairs the antitrust department.

Consumer protection is the practice of safeguarding buyers of goods and services, and the public, against unfair practices in the marketplace. Consumer protection measures are often established by law. Such laws are intended to prevent businesses from engaging in fraud or specified unfair practices to gain an advantage over competitors or to mislead consumers. They may also provide additional protection for the general public which may be impacted by a product even when they are not the direct purchaser or consumer of that product. For example, government regulations may require businesses to disclose detailed information about their products—particularly in areas where public health or safety is an issue, such as with food or automobiles.

<i>FTC v. Sperry & Hutchinson Trading Stamp Co.</i> 1972 United States Supreme Court case

Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Trading Stamp Co., 405 U.S. 233 (1972), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) may act against a company's “unfair” business practices even though the practice is none of the following: an antitrust violation, an incipient antitrust violation, a violation of the “spirit” of the antitrust laws, or a deceptive practice. This legal theory is termed the "unfairness doctrine."

The unfairness doctrine is a doctrine in United States trade regulation law under which the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) can declare a business practice "unfair" because it is oppressive or harmful to consumers even though the practice is not an antitrust violation, an incipient antitrust violation, a violation of the "spirit" of the antitrust laws, or a deceptive practice.

This report is the result of a student task force exploration of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), completed over the course of a summer job led by Ralph Nader. The seven law student volunteers began their evaluation of the FTC in June 1968, and published a revised and expanded version of the report as a book in January 1969.

In re Gateway Learning Corp, 138 F.T.C. 443 File No. 042-3047, was an investigatory action by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the Gateway Learning Corporation, distributor of Hooked on Phonics. In its complaint, the FTC alleged that Gateway had committed both unfair and deceptive trade practices by violating the terms of its own privacy policy and making retroactive changes to its privacy policy without notifying its customers. Gateway reached a settlement with the FTC, entering into a consent decree in July 2004, before formal charges were filed.

The franchise rule defines acts or practices that are unfair or deceptive in the franchise industry in the United States. The franchise rule is published by the Federal Trade Commission. The franchise rule seeks to facilitate informed decisions and to prevent deception in the sale of franchises by requiring franchisors to provide prospective franchisees with essential information prior to the sale. It does not, however, regulate the substance of the terms that control the relationship between franchisors and franchisees. Also, while the franchise rule removed the regulation of the sale of franchises from the purview of state law, placing it under the authority of the FTC to regulate interstate commerce, the FTC franchise rule does not require franchisors to disclose the unit performance statistics of the franchised system to new buyers of franchises. The FTC franchise rule was originally adopted in 1978. This followed a lengthy FTC rulemaking proceeding that began in 1971. A substantial revision of the FTC franchise rule was adopted by the FTC in 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of United States antitrust law</span>

The history of United States antitrust law is generally taken to begin with the Sherman Antitrust Act 1890, although some form of policy to regulate competition in the market economy has existed throughout the common law's history. Although "trust" had a technical legal meaning, the word was commonly used to denote big business, especially a large, growing manufacturing conglomerate of the sort that suddenly emerged in great numbers in the 1880s and 1890s. The Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 began a shift towards federal rather than state regulation of big business. It was followed by the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, the Clayton Antitrust Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914, the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936, and the Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950.

VemmaNutrition Company was a privately held multi-level marketing company that sold dietary supplements. The company was shut down in 2015 by the FTC for engaging in deceptive practices and being a pyramid scheme.

FTC v. Balls of Kryptonite is an enforcement action brought in 2009 by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in United States District Court for the Central District of California. The defendant was Jaivin Karnani, a Southern California man, his company Balls of Kryptonite LLC, and several other corporate names they did business as. In 2011 the FTC secured a court order barring Karnani and Balls of Kryptonite from engaging in many of the deceptive business practices that had brought him to the agency's attention.

FTC v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Co., 344 U.S. 392 (1953), was a 1953 decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that, where exclusive output contracts used by one company "and the three other major companies have foreclosed to competitors 75 percent of all available outlets for this business throughout the United States" the practice is "a device which has sewed up a market so tightly for the benefit of a few [that it] falls within the prohibitions of the Sherman Act, and is therefore an 'unfair method of competition' " under § 5 of the FTC Act. In so ruling, the Court extended the analysis under § 3 of the Clayton Act of requirements contracts that it made in the Standard Stations case to output contracts brought under the Sherman or FTC Acts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lina Khan</span> American legal scholar and jurist (born 1989)

Lina Maliha Khan is a British-born American legal scholar serving since 2021 as chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). She is also a professor at Columbia Law School.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Melissa Holyoak</span> U.S. lawyer and politician

Melissa Holyoak is an American lawyer serving since 2024 as a commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission. She previously served as the solicitor general of Utah from 2020 to 2024.

References

  1. ↑ "FTC Agency Financial Report" (PDF). ftc.gov. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
  2. ↑ "H.R.2882 – Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024". Congress.
  3. ↑ "Ten Years of the Best Places to Work in the Federal Government® Rankings" (PDF). bestplacestowork.org.
  4. ↑ "Federal Trade Commission: A History". FTC.gov. January 18, 2012. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  5. ↑ Van Loo, Rory (October 1, 2019). "The Missing Regulatory State: Monitoring Businesses in an Age of Surveillance". Vanderbilt Law Review. 72 (5): 1563.
  6. ↑ Fayne, James A. (1915). "The Federal Trade Commission: The Development of the Law which led to its Establishment". American Political Science Review. 9 (1): 57–67. doi:10.2307/1945762. ISSN   0003-0554. JSTOR   1945762. S2CID   146939544.
  7. 1 2 A Brief History of the Federal Trade Commission, Federal Trade Commission, 90th Anniversary Symposium.
  8. ↑ Republican Party Platform of 1912, June 18, 1912; Democratic Party Platform of 1912, June 25, 1912; USCB.edu
  9. ↑ Platform of the Progressive Party, August 7, 1912; PBS.
  10. 1 2 FTC Announces Results of Compliance Testing of Over 300 Funeral Homes in the Second Year of the Funeral Rule Offenders Program Archived June 29, 2007, at the Wayback Machine , Federal Trade Commission, February 25, 1998
  11. ↑ "Federal Trade Commission Funeral Rule – 16 CFR Part 453". Ftc.gov. October 24, 2008. Archived from the original on July 24, 2012. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  12. ↑ "Business Opportunity Scam "Epidemic"". Ftc.gov. July 18, 1995. Archived from the original on March 10, 2007. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  13. ↑ Hurley, Lawrence (April 22, 2021). "U.S. Supreme Court curbs FTC's power to recoup ill-gotten gains". Reuters . Retrieved April 22, 2021.
  14. ↑ Elliott, Vittoria (August 1, 2024). "What Project 2025 Means for Big Tech … and Everyone Else". Wired. ISSN   1059-1028 . Retrieved August 4, 2024. And though some conservatives have railed against the dominance of Big Tech, Project 2025 also suggests that a second Trump administration could abolish the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which currently has the power to enforce antitrust laws.
  15. ↑ Liedtke, Michael "US regulators seek to break up Google, forcing Chrome sale as part of monopoly punishment" Associated Press, November 21, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2024.
  16. 1 2 Hsu, Andrea (April 23, 2024). "U.S. bans non-compete agreements for nearly all jobs". NPR.
  17. 1 2 Rugaber, Christopher (April 23, 2024). "New federal rule would bar 'noncompete' agreements for most employees". AP News. Retrieved August 4, 2024.
  18. ↑ Niedzwiadek, Nick (July 23, 2024). "Politico Pro: Judge sides with FTC in second challenge to non-compete ban". subscriber.politicopro.com. Retrieved August 4, 2024.
  19. ↑ Wise, Justin (July 23, 2024). "FTC Gets Win on Noncompete Ban After Loss in Another Court". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved August 25, 2024.
  20. ↑ Hsu, Andrea. "Federal judge throws out U.S. ban on noncompetes". NPR. Retrieved August 25, 2024.
  21. ↑ Mekelburg, Madlin. "FTC Ban on Worker Noncompete Deals Blocked by Federal Judge (2)". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved August 25, 2024.
  22. ↑ Kaye, Danielle (August 20, 2024). "Judge Blocks F.T.C.'s Noncompete Rule". The New York Times. Retrieved August 25, 2024.
  23. ↑ Jones, Callum (March 9, 2024). "'She's going to prevail': FTC head Lina Khan is fighting for an anti-monopoly America". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved July 14, 2024.
  24. ↑ "Feds poised to sue pharmacy gatekeepers over high drug costs". Politico. July 10, 2024.
  25. ↑ "US FTC to sue drug middlemen over insulin prices, source says". Reuters. July 10, 2024.
  26. ↑ Brittain, Blake (June 10, 2024). "Amneal, US FTC win order removing Teva inhaler patents from FDA list". Reuters.
  27. ↑ Sisco, Josh (July 10, 2024). "Feds poised to sue pharmacy gatekeepers over high drug costs". Politico.
  28. ↑ Aboulenein, Ahmed (July 9, 2024). "Explainer: Why are US pharmacy benefit managers under fire?". Reuters.
  29. ↑ Whyte, Liz Essley (July 9, 2024). "Big Pharmacy-Benefit Managers Increase Drug Costs, FTC Says". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 14, 2024– via MSN.
  30. ↑ Pifer, Rebecca (July 9, 2024). "FTC slams pharmacy benefit managers in first report from ongoing investigation". Healthcare Dive. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2024.
  31. ↑ Abelson, Reed; Robbins, Rebecca (September 20, 2024). "F.T.C. Accuses Drug Middlemen of Inflating Insulin Prices". New York Times. Archived from the original on September 20, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
  32. ↑ Weixel, Nathaniel (September 20, 2024). "FTC sues three largest drug middlemen for allegedly inflating insulin prices". The Hill. Retrieved September 24, 2024.
  33. ↑ "US FTC finalizes ban on companies buying and selling fake online reviews". Reuters. August 14, 2024.
  34. ↑ "FTC bans fake online reviews, testimonials". The Hill. August 14, 2024.
  35. ↑ Hill, Meredith Lee (August 14, 2024). "Grocery price gouging to feature prominently in Harris economic plan". Politico.
  36. ↑ Sisco, Josh (February 26, 2024). "FTC, states challenge Kroger's $25 billion grocery merger with Albertsons". Politico.
  37. ↑ Kaye, Danielle (December 10, 2024). "Federal Judge Blocks $25 Billion Kroger-Albertsons Grocery Merger". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 11, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
  38. ↑ Burns, Tobias (March 29, 2024). "FTC calls out profits as a driver of grocery prices". The Hill. Retrieved August 17, 2024.
  39. ↑ Suter, Tara (August 2, 2024). "Federal Trade Commission to probe stubbornly high grocery prices". The Hill. Retrieved August 17, 2024.
  40. 1 2 Godoy, Jody (August 1, 2024). "US targets surging grocery prices in latest probe". Reuters.
  41. ↑ Godoy, Jody "FTC takes on subscription traps with 'click to cancel' rule" Reuters, October 16, 2024. Retrieved November 5, 2024.
  42. ↑ Narea, Nicole (August 13, 2024). "Biden wants to free you from all those subscriptions you meant to cancel but didn't". Vox. Retrieved August 14, 2024.
  43. 1 2 Mastrangelo, Dominick (October 16, 2024). "FTC to implement rule making it easier to cancel subscriptions". The Hill. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
  44. ↑ Selyukh, Alina (October 16, 2024). "Canceling subscriptions has to be as easy as signing up, FTC says in a new rule". NPR. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
  45. ↑ "FTC moves to take the 'frustration' out of canceling subscriptions for consumers". NBC News. October 16, 2024. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
  46. ↑ Warren, Tom (October 13, 2023). "Microsoft completes Activision Blizzard acquisition, Call of Duty now part of Xbox". The Verge. Retrieved August 4, 2024.
  47. ↑ Carpenter, Nicole (February 7, 2024). "The FTC isn't too happy with Microsoft's Activision Blizzard layoffs". Polygon. Retrieved August 4, 2024.
  48. ↑ Kelly, Makena (July 21, 2021). "FTC pledges to fight unlawful right to repair restrictions". The Verge . Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  49. ↑ Brodkin, Jon (October 25, 2024). "US Copyright Office "frees the McFlurry," allowing repair of ice cream machines". Ars Technica. Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  50. ↑ Hurwitz, Sophie. "Donald Trump talked about fixing McDonald's ice cream machines. Lina Khan actually did". Mother Jones. Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  51. ↑ Kang, Cecilia; Isaac, Mike (December 9, 2020). "U.S. and States Say Facebook Illegally Crushed Competition". The New York Times. Retrieved August 25, 2024.
  52. ↑ Mobbs, Brent (March 9, 2021). "FTC v. Facebook: Social Media Giant Sued for Anticompetitive Conduct". Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. Retrieved August 25, 2024.
  53. ↑ "FTC Halts Elusive Business Opportunity Scheme". Federal Trade Commission. September 26, 2013. Retrieved February 8, 2019.
  54. ↑ "Case 2:13-cv-01583-ROS Document 95 Filed 09/13/13" (PDF). FTC.
  55. ↑ "What is transaction laundering and what is the Industry doing about it?". Payments Cards & Mobile. March 15, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2019.
  56. ↑ "FTC Targets Transaction Laundering In Landmark Lawsuit". EverCompliant. September 13, 2017. Archived from the original on February 9, 2019. Retrieved February 8, 2019.
  57. ↑ "Two Defendants Settle Allegations in 'Money Now Funding' Credit Card Charge Laundering Scheme". Federal Trade Commission. December 10, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2019.
  58. ↑ "FTC sues OMICS group: Are predatory publishers' days numbered?". STAT News. September 2, 2016. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  59. 1 2 3 Straumsheim, Carl (August 29, 2016). "Federal Trade Commission begins to crack down on 'predatory' publishers". Inside Higher Ed . Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  60. 1 2 McCook, Alison (August 26, 2016). "U.S. government agency sues publisher, charging it with deceiving researchers". Retraction Watch . Retrieved November 2, 2016.
  61. ↑ "OMICS Group Inc". Federal Trade Commission. May 1, 2018. Retrieved January 15, 2019.
  62. 1 2 Shonka, David C.; Rusu, Ioana; Ashe, Gregory A.; Bogden, Daniel G.; Welsh, Blaine T. (August 25, 2016). "Case No. 2:16-cv-02022 – Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief" (PDF). Case 2:16-cv-02022. Federal Trade Commission. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  63. ↑ Bailey, Jonathan (September 12, 2016). "Federal Trade Commission Targeting Predatory Publishers". iThenticate – Plagiarism Blog. Retrieved November 2, 2016.
  64. ↑ "FTC Halts the Deceptive Practices of Academic Journal Publishers". Federal Trade Commission. November 22, 2017. Retrieved January 15, 2019.
  65. ↑ "OMICS Group Inc". ఫెడరల్ ట్రేడ్ కమిషను. August 26, 2016. Archived from the original on March 23, 2022. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  66. ↑ Prasad, R. (April 3, 2019). "Hyderabad-based OMICS fined $50 million for 'unfair, deceptive business practices'". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X. Archived from the original on March 23, 2022. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  67. ↑ "BRIEF OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION" (PDF). www.ftc.gov. October 11, 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 4, 2021. Retrieved November 4, 2021.
  68. ↑ "Sears Complaint" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 5, 2009. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  69. ↑ "Complaint" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 23, 2004. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  70. ↑ "Gateway Decision and Order, Sept. 2004" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 23, 2004. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  71. 1 2 3 4 5 "What hospital executives should be considering in mergers and acquisitions" (PDF). DHG Healthcare. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 24, 2017. Retrieved November 16, 2014.
  72. 1 2 3 "In the Matter of Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc., Phoebe North, Inc., HCA Inc., Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc., and Hospital Authority of Albany-Dougherty County". Federal Trade Commission. April 20, 2011. Retrieved November 16, 2014.
  73. 1 2 3 "Administrative Law Judge Upholds FTC's Complaint Against Ohio Hospital Deal, Orders ProMedica to Divest St. Luke's Hospital". Federal Trade Commission. January 5, 2012. Retrieved November 16, 2014.
  74. 1 2 "OSF Healthcare System Abandons Plans to Buy Rockford in Light of FTC Lawsuit; FTC Dismisses its Complaint Seeking to Block the Transaction". Federal Trade Commission. April 13, 2012. Retrieved November 16, 2014.
  75. 1 2 "Independent commissioners have shaped key FTC decisions – FTCWatch". www.mlexwatch.com. Retrieved September 11, 2021.
  76. ↑ "Biden taps big tech critic Lina Khan to chair the Federal Trade Commission". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved June 15, 2021.
  77. ↑ "15 U.S. Code § 41 – Federal Trade Commission established; membership; vacancies; seal". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved September 19, 2024.
  78. ↑ LexisNexis. "Breaking down barriers: Recruiting and promoting Black antitrust lawyers". mlexmarketinsight.com. Retrieved September 11, 2021.
  79. ↑ Birnbaum, Emily (April 21, 2021). "What to watch at Lina Khan's confirmation hearing". Politico. Retrieved September 11, 2021.
  80. ↑ "Office of Technology Research and Investigation". Federal Trade Commission. August 5, 2015. Retrieved November 28, 2020.
  81. ↑ "FTC Chief Technologists". Federal Trade Commission. May 1, 2018. Retrieved November 28, 2020.
  82. ↑ "Professor Tim Wu Named Advisor to Federal Trade Commission on Consumer Protection, Competition". law.columbia.edu. Retrieved November 28, 2020.
  83. ↑ "Professor Paul Ohm Named Advisor to Federal Trade Commission". Colorado Law. May 21, 2012. Retrieved November 28, 2020.
  84. ↑ "FTC Names Latanya Sweeney as Chief Technologist; Andrea Matwyshyn as Policy Advisor". Federal Trade Commission. November 18, 2013. Retrieved November 28, 2020.
  85. ↑ Van Loo, Rory (August 1, 2018). "Regulatory Monitors: Policing Firms in the Compliance Era". Faculty Scholarship. 119 (2): 369.
  86. ↑ Van Loo, Rory (April 1, 2020). "The New Gatekeepers: Private Firms as Public Enforcers". Virginia Law Review. 106 (2): 467.
  87. ↑ "FTC Issues Revised 'Green Guides'". FTC.gov. October 1, 2012. Retrieved October 24, 2013.
  88. ↑ 15 U.S.C.   § 45(a)(1)
  89. 1 2 "FTC Policy Statement on Unfairness, Dec. 17, 1980". Ftc.gov. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  90. 1 2 3 "FTC Policy Statement on Deception, Oct. 14, 1983". Ftc.gov. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  91. 1 2 3 4 ".com Disclosures: How to Make Effective Disclosures in Digital Advertising, March 2013" (PDF). FTC. Retrieved January 19, 2016.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.