Epic Games v. Google | |
---|---|
Court | United States District Court for the Northern District of California |
Full case name | Epic Games, Inc. v. Google Inc. |
Argued | November 6–December 1, 2023 |
Decided | December 11, 2023 |
Court membership | |
Judge sitting | James Donato |
Epic Games v. Google is a lawsuit brought by Epic Games against Google in August 2020 in the Northern District of California. [1] Filed concurrently with Epic Games v. Apple , Epic had challenged Google's monopolistic practices on its Google Play Store on Android devices. A jury trial was held in November and December 2023, after which the jury found for Epic on all counts, ruling that Google violated anti-trust laws in maintaining the Play Store as the dominant storefront with Android, including making deals to ensure apps would be solely published through the Play Store and requiring the Play Store be installed on third-party devices. The court ordered Google to allow alternate app stores on the Android system and temporarily restricted them from engaging in monetary benefits to developers that released exclusively on Google's Play Store.
Google operates the Google Play Store for Android devices. Similar to Apple and its App Store for iOS devices, Google takes a 30% share of the revenue for all sales made through the Play Store, including in-app purchases. This 30% revenue share was comparable to what other digital storefronts, like Steam, require as of 2019. [2]
Tim Sweeney, the CEO of Epic Games, had been outspoken about this 30% fee, believing that storefronts could significantly reduce this while still being profitable. [3] [4] Part of the reasoning behind the Epic Games Store was to show that Epic could operate this storefront at a 12% revenue share. [5] Epic released Fortnite Battle Royale for computers and consoles in 2017 as a free to play title supported by microtransactions, allowing players to buy in-game "V-bucks" currency for cosmetic items. When Fortnite was brought to mobile devices in 2018, Epic initially released the game through sideloading as to avoid giving Google any revenue from in-game sales. However, this led to a number of clones, some with malicious behavior, to appear in the Google Play Store to masquerade as the real Fortnite game, and Epic eventually discontinued the sideloaded version in favor of a legitimate Google Play version in 2020. [6]
On August 13, 2020, Epic initiated "Project Liberty", a plan developed by Sweeney to challenge the 30% revenue fees on Google's and Apple's stores. [7] Both the Android and iOS versions of Fortnite were updated with code to allow players to buy V-bucks directly from Epic alongside the respective storefront, providing a better deal for those buying directly from Epic. This practice violated the allowable terms for apps for both the Google Play Store and App Store, and Fortnite was removed from these storefronts that same day. [8] [9] Epic used this action to file federal lawsuits it had prepared against both Google and Apple in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, asserting their storefronts engaged in anti-competitive behavior. [10]
In Apple's case, Epic's case was overseen by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Apple filed a countersuit against Epic within weeks of Epic's action, citing a breach of contract. [11] The trial was held in May 2021, [12] and Rogers made her decision in both suits in September 2021, ruling against Epic on nine of their ten claims, but upholding a claim related to Apple's anti-steering provisions, which prevented apps from advertising other means to purchase in-game content. [13] Rogers ordered that Apple must allow for apps to include such steering. Both Epic and Apple appealed the ruling to the Ninth Circuit, which upheld Rogers' ruling in Apple 2023. [14] The Supreme Court of the United States declined to hear the subsequent appeals, leaving Rogers' order to Apple in place. [15]
In initiating the lawsuits against Google and Apple, Epic did not seek monetary damages but instead was "seeking injunctive relief to allow fair competition in these two key markets that directly affect hundreds of millions of consumers and tens of thousands, if not more, of third-party app developers." [16] In comments on social media the next day, Sweeney said that they undertook the actions as "we're fighting for the freedom of people who bought smartphones to install apps from sources of their choosing, the freedom for creators of apps to distribute them as they choose, and the freedom of both groups to do business directly. The primary opposing argument is: 'Smartphone markers can do whatever they want.' This as an awful notion.[sic] We all have rights, and we need to fight to defend our rights against whoever would deny them." [17] While Epic had focused on whether Apple held a monopoly on iOS devices in that trial, Epic instead argued that Google used aggressive deal-making with partners as to maintain the strength of the Google Play Store within the Android operating system. [18]
Google, in response to the lawsuit, stated to The Verge that "For game developers who choose to use the Play Store, we have consistent policies that are fair to developers and keep the store safe for users. While Fortnite remains available on Android, we can no longer make it available on Play because it violates our policies. However, we welcome the opportunity to continue our discussions with Epic and bring Fortnite back to Google Play." [19] Google also distanced itself from the Apple case, asserting that the Android operating system does not have the same single storefront restriction as Apple's iOS, and thus allows different Android phone manufacturers to bundle different storefronts and apps as they desire. Google said they are negotiating with Epic Games far differently from Apple in their case. [20]
About a month after Epic's lawsuits, Epic joined with smaller tech firms like Match.com and Spotify to create the Coalition for App Fairness, an advocacy group to challenge Apple and Google's practices on their respective app stores. [21]
Google countersued Epic in October 2021, asserting that by introducing a version of Fortnite that did not use Google Play's payment systems, Epic had violated their contract with Google, and because this version still exists and can be obtained in other formats outside of Google Play, Epic "has alternatively been unjustly enriched at Google's expense", and seek to recover monetary damages from this version. [22]
While the jury trial was pending, Google was sued in July 2021 by a coalition of 36 states and the District of Columbia over its app store practices, mirroring several of the complaints Epic had filed under. [23] This lawsuit was settled in September 2023, with Google agreeing to pay $700 million as part of the settlement. In addition, Google stated they would allow selected apps to use a new User Choice Billing option, which lets apps under the group to charge users directly without having to go through the Play Store payment system, though developers would still need to pay a 26% revenue sharing fee back to Google. The settlement also loosened requirements for third-party storefronts in sharing space with the Play Store. [24] [25]
The Match Group, which runs several app companies including Tinder and Match.com, launched its own lawsuit against Google over its app store policies in May 2022, also with similar complaints raised in Epic's suit. [26] Google and Match Group settled in November 2023, ahead of Epic's trial, with Google paying Match Group $40 million and allowing Match Group to use its User Choice Payment system. [27]
The jury trial was held from November 6 through December 11, 2023. [18] During the trial, Epic was able to show the numerous deals that Google had made with various partners as to maintain the strength of the Google Play store and discourage other storefronts. Among these included what was known as "Project Hug", an effort to work with twenty mobile publishers, including Activision, Aniplex, Bandai Namco, Bethesda, Blizzard, Com2uS, EA, King, Mixi, Niantic, NCSoft, Netmarble, NetEase, Nexon, Nintendo, Pearl Abyss, The Pokémon Company, Riot, Square Enix, Supercell, Tencent, and Ubisoft, as to keep their games and apps within the Play Store, with hundreds of millions of dollars used to maintain this agreement. [28] Similarly, a "Project Banyan" referred to a deal made with Samsung Electronics as to weaken the impact of their Galaxy Store on Android devices. [28] Epic showed that Google had become concerned about Epic's actions and saw them as a disruptor, in that through a "contagion effect", other developers would follow Epic's approach of sideloading their games to avoid the Play Store and potentially cost them $2 billion a year in revenue. Google appeared to have looked into acquiring a controlling portion of Epic as to discourage Epic from avoiding the Play Store. [28] Epic also discovered that Google had made a number of sweetheart deals with specific apps to avoid or reduce Play Store or the User Choice Billing fees, such as with Spotify and Netflix. [28] Google was also found to have deleted certain chat messages that were relevant to the case, which was said to undercut Google's credibility to the jury. [29]
The jury deliberated and returned with its verdict on December 11, ruling on all eleven counts in favor of Epic. The jury affirmed that Google had engaged in anti-competitive practices both with the Play Store and its related billing system, and maintained its monopoly through how it made deals with partners using its dominant position in the overall technology market. The jury also found that Google furthered its position by requiring the Play Store to be installed on third-party Android hardware such as Samsung phones. [29]
Determination of relief given the jury's findings was scheduled to take place starting in January 2024. Google has stated its intent to appeal the decision. [29]
Epic submitted its recommended injunctions to place on Google stemming from the jury's decision, which includes preventing Google from contracts like "Project Hug" to discourage developers from releasing on third-party app stores, no tying of Google Play with phone OEMs, and preventing any anti-steering steps. [30] Hearings on the proposed remedies were first held on August 14, 2024. [31]
Judge Donato issued his ruling on October 7, 2024, which included a permanent injunction on Google to allow for alternative app stores on Android. It also established that for a period of three years, Google cannot pay or provide discounts to developers that release exclusively through the Play Store. Google's compliance will be overseen by a three-person committee from Epic and Google members. [32] Google stated they intend to appeal the proposed remedies. [33]
Epic Games, Inc. is an American video game and software developer and publisher based in Cary, North Carolina. The company was founded by Tim Sweeney as Potomac Computer Systems in 1991, originally located in his parents' house in Potomac, Maryland. Following its first commercial video game release, ZZT (1991), the company became Epic MegaGames, Inc. in early 1992 and brought on Mark Rein, who has been its vice president since. After moving the headquarters to Cary in 1999, the studio changed its name to Epic Games.
The App Store is an app marketplace developed and maintained by Apple, for mobile apps on its iOS and iPadOS operating systems. The store allows users to browse and download approved apps developed within Apple's iOS SDK. Apps can be downloaded on the iPhone, iPod Touch, or iPad, and some can be transferred to the Apple Watch smartwatch or 4th-generation or newer Apple TVs as extensions of iPhone apps.
The Galaxy Store is an app store offering apps, games and exclusive themes and other customizations for mobile devices manufactured by Samsung Electronics. The service is primarily supplied pre-installed on Samsung Galaxy smartphones and tablets, and Galaxy Watch wearables. It requires a Samsung account to be used.
Cloud gaming, sometimes called gaming on demand or game streaming, is a type of online gaming that runs video games on remote servers and streams the game's output directly to a user's device, or more colloquially, playing a game remotely from a cloud. It contrasts with traditional means of gaming, wherein a game is run locally on a user's video game console, personal computer, or mobile device.
Amazon Appstore is an app store for Android-compatible platforms operated by Amazon.com Services, LLC, a subsidiary of Amazon.
Maria Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers is an American lawyer serving as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. She was previously a California state court judge on the Alameda County Superior Court from 2008 to 2011.
The Microsoft Store is a digital distribution platform operated by Microsoft. It was created as an app store for Windows 8 as the primary means of distributing Universal Windows Platform apps. With Windows 10 1803, Microsoft merged its other distribution platforms into Microsoft Store, making it a unified distribution point for apps, console games, and digital videos. Digital music was included until the end of 2017, and E-books were included until 2019.
Google Play, also known as the Google Play Store or Play Store and formerly known as Android Market, is a digital distribution service operated and developed by Google. It serves as the official app store for certified devices running on the Android operating system and its derivatives, as well as ChromeOS, allowing users to browse and download applications developed with the Android software development kit and published through Google. Google Play has also served as a digital media store, offering games, music, books, movies, and television programs. Content that has been purchased on Google Play Movies & TV and Google Play Books can be accessed on a web browser and through the Android and iOS apps.
Fire OS is an operating system based on the Android Open Source Project (AOSP), It is developed by Amazon for their devices. Fire OS includes proprietary software, a customized user interface primarily centered on content consumption, and heavy ties to content available from Amazon's storefronts and services.
Google has been involved in multiple lawsuits over issues such as privacy, advertising, intellectual property and various Google services such as Google Books and YouTube. The company's legal department expanded from one to nearly 100 lawyers in the first five years of business, and by 2014 had grown to around 400 lawyers. Google's Chief Legal Officer is Senior Vice President of Corporate Development David Drummond.
Fortnite Battle Royale is a free-to-play battle royale video game developed and published by Epic Games. It is a companion game to Fortnite: Save the World, a cooperative survival game with construction elements. It was initially released in early access on September 26, 2017, for macOS, PlayStation 4, Windows, and Xbox One, followed by ports for iOS, Nintendo Switch, and Android. Epic dropped the early access label for the game on June 29, 2020. Versions for the Xbox Series X/S and PlayStation 5 were released as launch titles in late 2020.
Device neutrality law states that the users have the right of non-discrimination of the services and apps they use, based on platform control by hardware companies.
Fortnite is an online video game and game platform developed by Epic Games and released in 2017. It is available in six distinct game mode versions that otherwise share the same general gameplay and game engine: Fortnite Battle Royale, a free-to-play battle royale game in which up to 100 players fight to be the last person standing; Fortnite: Save the World, a cooperative hybrid tower defense-shooter and survival game in which up to four players fight off zombie-like creatures and defend objects with traps and fortifications they can build; Fortnite Creative, in which players are given complete freedom to create worlds and battle arenas; Lego Fortnite, an open world survival game; Rocket Racing, a racing game; and Fortnite Festival, a rhythm game.
The Epic Games Store is a video game digital distribution service and storefront operated by Epic Games. It launched in December 2018 as a software client, for Microsoft Windows and macOS, and online storefront. Android and iOS versions of the store launched in August 2024, with the iOS version only available for European users. The service provides friends list management, game matchmaking, and other features. Epic Games has further plans to expand the feature set of the storefront but it does not plan to add as many features as other digital distribution platforms, such as discussion boards or user reviews, instead using existing social media platforms to support these.
The popularisation of mobile games began as early as 1997 with the introduction of Snake preloaded on Nokia feature phones, demonstrating the practicality of games on these devices. Several mobile device manufacturers included preloaded games in the wake of Snake's success. In 1999, the introduction of the i-mode service in Japan allowed a wide variety of more advanced mobile games to be downloaded onto smartphones, though the service was largely limited to Japan. By the early 2000s, the technical specifications of Western handsets had also matured to the point where downloadable applications could be supported, but mainstream adoption continued to be hampered by market fragmentation between different devices, operating environments, and distributors.
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc. was a lawsuit brought by Epic Games against Apple in August 2020 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, related to Apple's practices in the iOS App Store. Epic Games specifically had challenged Apple's restrictions on apps from having other in-app purchasing methods outside of the one offered by the App Store. Epic Games's founder Tim Sweeney had previously challenged the 30% revenue cut that Apple takes on each purchase made in the App Store, and with their game Fortnite, wanted to either bypass Apple or have Apple take less of a cut. Epic implemented changes in Fortnite intentionally on August 13, 2020, to bypass the App Store payment system, prompting Apple to block the game from the App Store and leading to Epic filing its lawsuit. Apple filed a countersuit, asserting Epic purposely breached its terms of contract with Apple to goad it into action, and defended itself from Epic's suit.
The Coalition for App Fairness (CAF) is a coalition comprised by companies, who aim to reach a fairer deal for the inclusion of their apps into the Apple App Store or the Google Play Store. The organization's executive director is Meghan DiMuzio and its headquarters are located in Washington, D.C.
The Open App Markets Act (OAMA) is a proposed antitrust bill in the United States Congress. The Senate version of the legislation, S.2710, was introduced on August 11, 2021, by Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN). On August 13, 2021, a companion bill in the House of Representatives was introduced by Hank Johnson (D-GA) and Ken Buck (R-CO).
United States v. Google LLC is an ongoing federal antitrust case brought by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) against Google LLC on October 20, 2020. The suit alleges that Google has violated the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 by illegally monopolizing the search engine and search advertising markets, most notably on Android devices, as well as with Apple and mobile carriers.
United States, et al. v. Apple Inc. is a lawsuit brought against multinational technology corporation Apple Inc. in 2024. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) alleges that Apple violated antitrust statutes. The lawsuit contrasts the practices of Apple with those of Microsoft in United States v. Microsoft Corp., and alleges that Apple is engaging in similar tactics and committing even more egregious violations. This lawsuit comes in the wake of Epic Games v. Apple and the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act in the European Union.