Smartphone patent wars

Last updated

The smartphone wars or smartphone patents licensing and litigation refers to commercial struggles among smartphone manufacturers including Sony Mobile, Google, Apple Inc., Samsung, Microsoft, Nokia, Motorola, Huawei, LG Electronics, ZTE and HTC, by patent litigation and other means. The conflict is part of the wider "patent wars" between technology and software corporations.[ citation needed ]

Contents

To secure and increase market share, companies granted a patent can sue to prevent competitors from using the methods the patent covers. Since 2010 the number of lawsuits, counter-suits, and trade complaints based on patents and designs in the market for smartphones, and devices based on smartphone OSes such as Android and iOS, has increased significantly.[ citation needed ]

Timeline

Initial suits, countersuits, rulings, license agreements, and other major events in italics: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

2009

The pattern of suing and countersuing really began in 2009 as growth in the demand for smartphones accelerated dramatically with the advent of the modern smartphone, which combined a responsive touch screen with a modern multi-tasking operating system, a browser that provided full web access and an application store, in the form of the Apple iPhone 3G and the first Android phones.

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2021

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smartphone</span> Handheld mobile device

A smartphone, often simply called a phone, is a mobile device that combines the functionality of a traditional mobile phone with advanced computing capabilities. It typically has a touchscreen interface, allowing users to access a wide range of applications and services, such as web browsing, email, and social media, as well as multimedia playback and streaming. Smartphones have built-in cameras, GPS navigation, and support for various communication methods, including voice calls, text messaging, and internet-based messaging apps.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">HTC</span> Taiwanese electronics company

HTC Corporation, or High Tech Computer Corporation, is a Taiwanese consumer electronics corporation headquartered in Taoyuan District, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Founded in 1997, HTC began as an original design manufacturer and original equipment manufacturer that designed and manufactured laptop computers.

NTP, Inc. is a Virginia-based patent holding company founded in 1992 by the late inventor Thomas J. Campana Jr. and Donald E. Stout. The company's primary asset is a portfolio of 50 US patents and additional pending US and international patent applications. These patents and patent applications disclose inventions in the fields of wireless email and RF Antenna design. The named inventors include Andrew Andros and Thomas Campana. About half of the US patents were originally assigned to Telefind Corporation, a Florida-based company partly owned by Campana.

The multinational technology corporation Apple Inc. has been a participant in various legal proceedings and claims since it began operation and, like its competitors and peers, engages in litigation in its normal course of business for a variety of reasons. In particular, Apple is known for and promotes itself as actively and aggressively enforcing its intellectual property interests. From the 1980s to the present, Apple has been plaintiff or defendant in civil actions in the United States and other countries. Some of these actions have determined significant case law for the information technology industry and many have captured the attention of the public and media. Apple's litigation generally involves intellectual property disputes, but the company has also been a party in lawsuits that include antitrust claims, consumer actions, commercial unfair trade practice suits, defamation claims, and corporate espionage, among other matters.

A mobile operating system is an operating system used for smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, smartglasses, or other non-laptop personal mobile computing devices. While computers such as typical/mobile laptops are "mobile", the operating systems used on them are usually not considered mobile, as they were originally designed for desktop computers that historically did not have or need specific mobile features. This "fine line" distinguishing mobile and other forms has become blurred in recent years, due to the fact that newer devices have become smaller and more mobile, unlike the hardware of the past. Key notabilities blurring this line are the introduction of tablet computers, light laptops, and the hybridization of the two in 2-in-1 PCs.

This is a list of tablet computers, grouped by intended audience and form factor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparison of smartphones</span> Comparison of smartphones from 2004 to present

This is a comparison of the various internal components and features of many smartphones.

The form factor of a mobile phone is its size, shape, and style, as well as the layout and position of its major components.

The history of tablet computers and the associated special operating software is an example of pen computing technology, and thus the development of tablets has deep historical roots. The first patent for a system that recognized handwritten characters by analyzing the handwriting motion was granted in 1914. The first publicly demonstrated system using a tablet and handwriting recognition instead of a keyboard for working with a modern digital computer dates to 1956.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1</span> Tablet computer

Introduced in 2011, the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 is an Android-based tablet computer designed and manufactured by Samsung. It is part of the Samsung Galaxy Tab series, and features a 10.1-inch (260 mm) display and a 1 GHz dual-core Nvidia Tegra 2 processor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9</span> Tablet computer by Samsung

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 is an Android-based tablet computer designed and manufactured by Samsung, introduced on 22 March 2011 at CTIA wireless convention in its Samsung Unpacked event in Orlando. It is part of the Samsung Galaxy Tab series, and features an 8.9-inch display and a 1 GHz dual-core Nvidia Tegra 2 processor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP</span> Law firm

Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP is a litigation boutique located in San Francisco, California, founded in 1978. The firm's areas of practice include intellectual property, professional liability, class actions, wrongful termination defense, general contract and commercial litigation, antitrust, white collar crime, and appellate.

Motorola Mobility v. Apple Inc. was one of a series of lawsuits between technology companies Motorola Mobility and Apple Inc. In the year before Apple and Samsung began suing each other on most continents, and while Apple and High Tech Computer Corp. (HTC) were already embroiled in a patent fight, Motorola Mobility and Apple started a period of intense patent litigation. The Motorola-Apple patent imbroglio commenced with claims and cross-claims between the companies for patent infringement, and encompassed multiple venues in multiple countries as each party sought friendly forums for litigating its respective claims; the fight also included administrative law rulings as well as United States International Trade Commission (ITC) and European Commission involvement. In April 2012, the controversy centered on whether a FRAND license to a components manufacturer carries over to an equipment manufacturer incorporating the component into equipment, an issue not addressed in the Supreme Court's default analysis using the exhaustion doctrine in Quanta v. LG Electronics. In June 2012, appellate judge Richard Posner dismissed the U.S. case with prejudice and the parties appealed the decision a month later.

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the general title of a series of patent infringement lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics in the United States Court system, regarding the design of smartphones and tablet computers. Between them, the two companies have dominated the manufacturing of smartphones since the early 2010s, and made about 40% of all smartphones sold worldwide as of 2024. In early 2011, Apple initiated patent infringement lawsuits against Samsung, who typically responded with countersuits. Apple's multinational litigation over technology patents became known as part of the smartphone wars: extensive litigation and fierce competition in the global market for consumer mobile communications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phablet</span> Electronic device with features of both a smartphone and a tablet

A phablet is a mobile device combining or straddling the size formats of smartphones and tablets. The word is a blend word of phone and tablet. The term was largely unused by the late 2010s, since average phone sizes eventually morphed into small tablet sizes, up to 6.9 inches (180 mm), with wider aspect ratios.

A lock screen is a computer user interface element used by various operating systems. They regulate immediate access to a device by requiring the user to perform a certain action in order to receive access, such as entering a password, using a certain button combination, or performing a certain gesture using a device's touchscreen. There are various authentication methods to get past the lock screen, with the most popular and common ones being personal identification numbers (PINs), the Android pattern lock, and biometrics.

Lists of mobile computers

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bootloader unlocking</span> Process of disabling secure device booting

Bootloader unlocking is the process of disabling the bootloader security that makes secure boot possible. It can make advanced customizations possible, such as installing custom firmware. On smartphones, this can be a custom Android distribution or another mobile operating system. Some bootloaders are not locked at all and some are locked, but can be unlocked with a command or with assistance from the manufacturer. Some do not include an unlocking method and can only be unlocked through a software exploit.

References

  1. Florian Mueller. "Apple vs Android 10.12.02" . Retrieved September 8, 2011.
  2. Florian Mueller. "NokiaVsApple_11.03.31.100" . Retrieved September 8, 2011.
  3. Florian Mueller. "Microsoft vs Motorola 11.04.09" . Retrieved September 8, 2011.
  4. Florian Mueller. "AppleVsSamsung_11.07.05" . Retrieved September 8, 2011.
  5. Florian Mueller. "AppleVsHTCandS3_11.07.29" . Retrieved September 8, 2011.
  6. "Nokia sues Apple over iPhone's use of patented wireless standards". Appleinsider.com. October 22, 2009. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  7. "Nokia vs. Apple: the in-depth analysis". Engadget.com. 29 October 2009. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  8. "Apple countersues Nokia for infringing 13 patents". Engadget.com. 11 December 2009. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  9. Foresman, Chris (January 4, 2010). "Nokia adds additional lawsuit in patent catfight with Apple". Arstechnica.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  10. Foresman, Chris (December 29, 2009). "Nokia hurls new salvo in spat with Apple, complains to ITC". Arstechnica.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  11. Decker, Susan (January 16, 2010). "Apple Files New Trade Complaint With Against Nokia". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  12. Cheng, Jacqui (January 18, 2010). "Apple wants Nokia's US imports blocked". Arstechnica.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  13. "Apple vs HTC: a patent breakdown". Engadget.com. March 2, 2010. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  14. "Google backs HTC in what could be 'long and bloody battle' with Apple". Appleinsider.com. March 3, 2010. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  15. Bilton, Nick (March 2, 2010). "What Apple vs. HTC Could Mean". Bits.blogs.nytimes.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  16. "HTC says it uses own technology, not Apple's". Macworld.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  17. Foresman, Chris (March 9, 2010). "HTC lawsuit came after warning by Apple to handset makers". Arstechnica.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  18. "Microsoft Announces Patent Agreement With HTC". Microsoft.com. April 27, 2010. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  19. "HTC licenses Microsoft's mobile patents for Android phones – First Take". Gartenberg.wordpress.com. April 28, 2010. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  20. Johnston, Casey (May 7, 2010). "Nokia applies patent thumbscrews to Apple's iPad". Arstechnica.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  21. "HTC countersues Apple, claims infringement of five patents". Appleinsider.com. May 12, 2010. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  22. "S3 Graphics Files New 337 Complaint Regarding Certain Electronic Devices With Image Processing Systems". Itcblog.com. June 2, 2010. Archived from the original on January 18, 2012. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  23. Sara Yin (August 8, 2011). "HTC Sues Apple UK Weeks after ITC Loss". PC Magazine. Retrieved February 11, 2013.
  24. Anthony Ha (August 12, 2010). "Oracle sues Google over Android". Venturebeat.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  25. Protalinski, Emil (October 2, 2010). "Microsoft sues Motorola, citing Android patent infringement". Arstechnica.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  26. "Microsoft Files Patent Infringement Action Against Motorola". Microsoft.com. October 1, 2010. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  27. Foresman, Chris (October 6, 2010). "Motorola asks ITC, two federal courts to throw book at Apple". Arstechnica.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  28. "Motorola Moves Offensively with a New Lawsuit against Apple". Patentlyapple.com. October 15, 2010. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  29. Motorola seeks to invalidate Apple phone patents.
  30. Apple Files Lawsuit against Motorola to Defend Multi-Touch.
  31. Apple Patent Case Against Motorola to Get Trade Agency Review.
  32. Apple vs. Motorola: now 42 patents-in-suit (24 Apple and 18 Motorola patents).
  33. Microsoft sues Barnes & Noble over Android in Nook.
  34. Nokia files second ITC complaint against Apple Archived 2012-03-25 at the Wayback Machine .
  35. Escalation: Nokia files new ITC complaint against Apple (plus a corresponding federal lawsuit), FOSS Patents.
  36. "Apple to Samsung: Stop stealing ideas". CNN.com. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
  37. Apple sues Samsung: a complete lawsuit analysis Archived 2011-07-28 at the Wayback Machine .
  38. Samsung Countersues Apple for Patent Infringement.
  39. Samsung sues Apple for infringing 10 patents: a closer look.
  40. Samsung Must Show Cell Phones to Apple.
  41. Judge Orders Samsung to Give Apple Unreleased Tablets, Smartphones.
  42. Samsung’s lawyers demand to see the iPhone 5 and iPad 3.
  43. Nokia Wins Apple Patent-License Deal Cash, Settles Lawsuits.
  44. Apple Settles With Nokia In Patent Lawsuit.
  45. Staff Reporter, "Apple alleges Samsung of ‘slavishly copying’ its technology; questions new Galaxy Tab 10.1", International Business Times, June 19, 2011.
  46. Shocker: Samsung not allowed to see iPhone 5 and iPad 3.
  47. "Microsoft and General Dynamics Itronix Sign Patent Agreement: Agreement will cover General Dynamics Itronix devices running the Android platform". Microsoft.com. June 27, 2011. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  48. 1 2 3 4 FOSS Patents: Android device makers sign up as Microsoft patent licensees -- an overview of the situation.
  49. "Microsoft and Velocity Micro, Inc., Sign Patent Agreement Covering Android-Based Devices: Agreement provides broad coverage of Microsoft's patent portfolio". Microsoft.com. June 29, 2011. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  50. Dealtalk: Google bid "pi" for Nortel patents and lost.
  51. Nortel Announces the Winning Bidder of Its Patent Portfolio for a Purchase Price of US$4.5 Billion.
  52. Who Won The 6,000+ Nortel Patents? Apple, RIM, Microsoft — Everyone But Google.
  53. "Microsoft and Onkyo Corp. Sign Patent Agreement Covering Android-Based Tablets: Agreement provides broad coverage of Microsoft's patent portfolio". Microsoft.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  54. Apple files motion for preliminary injunction in the U.S. against four Samsung products: Infuse 4G, Galaxy S 4G, Droid Charge, Galaxy Tab 10.1.
  55. ITC ruling mixed in S3 Graphics v. Apple.
  56. "Microsoft and Wistron Sign Patent Agreement: Agreement will cover Wistron's Android tablets, smartphones and e-readers". Microsoft.com. July 5, 2011. Archived from the original on 2012-08-15. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  57. Microsoft patent division taking cash from at least 5 Android vendors Archived 2012-01-12 at the Wayback Machine .
  58. DailyTech - VIA, WTI Sell Stakes in S3 Graphics to HTC Archived 2014-02-02 at the Wayback Machine .
  59. HTC to Acquire Chip Designer S3 Graphics, Securing Patents in Apple Fight - Bloomberg.
  60. HTC facing backlash for S3 acquisition.
  61. Microsoft wants Samsung to pay smartphone license.
  62. HTC’s Flyer Tablet, Droid Accused of Infringing Apple Patents - Bloomberg.
  63. FOSS Patents: Apple files second ITC complaint against HTC: better luck next time?.
  64. Google Acquires Over 1,000 IBM Patents in July.
  65. Google's New Patents from IBM.
  66. Bad News for Android: ITC Rules HTC Violated Two Apple Patents - John Paczkowski - News - AllThingsD.
  67. Apple Lawsuit Puts Samsung Tablet Sales in Australia on Hold.
  68. Samsung's official comment on the Australian Galaxy Tab 10.1 situation is extremely weak.
  69. Tsukayama, Hayley (August 10, 2011). "Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 imports banned in most of Europe". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 11, 2011.
  70. Preliminary injunction granted by German court: Apple blocks Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the entire European Union except for the Netherlands.
  71. "Microsoft files to ban imports of Motorola smartphones". Android and Me. Retrieved December 10, 2011.
  72. Womack, Brian (August 22, 2011). "Motorola Value Found in 18 Patents Used Against Apple: Tech". Bloomberg. Retrieved December 10, 2011.
  73. Leske, Nicola (August 16, 2011). "Samsung Galaxy tablet ban lifted in most of Europe". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 1, 2016. Retrieved August 16, 2011.
  74. "Samsung Galaxy Tab ban is on hold". BBC. August 16, 2011. Retrieved August 16, 2011.
  75. 1 2 Google and IBM do it again: Google Acquires over 1,000 Patents from IBM in August.
  76. Microsoft Asks For An Import Ban On Motorola Smartphones.
  77. "Microsoft files to ban imports of Motorola smartphones". Android and Me. Retrieved December 10, 2011.
  78. Euro ban for Samsung Galaxy phone.
  79. Samsung Puts Galaxy 10.1 Tablet on Hold as Apple Wins German Court Order.
  80. FOSS Patents: Apple to ITC: Andy Rubin got inspiration for Android framework while working at Apple, hence infringes an Apple API patent.
  81. Milford, Phil (September 8, 2011). "HTC Sues Apple Using Google Patents Bought Last Week as Battle Escalates". Bloomberg. Retrieved December 10, 2011.
  82. Google Hands HTC Patents to Use Against Apple in Smartphone Wars.
  83. Patel, Nilay (September 7, 2011). "HTC sues Apple for patent infringement… using patents purchased by Google". Thisismynext.com. Archived from the original on 2011-10-26. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  84. Google gets its hands dirty - Apple 2.0 - Fortune Tech.
  85. "Microsoft and Acer Sign Patent License Agreement: Agreement will cover Acer's Android tablets and smartphones". Microsoft.com. September 8, 2011. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  86. "Microsoft and ViewSonic Sign Patent Agreement: Agreement will cover ViewSonic's Android Tablets and smartphones". Microsoft.com. September 8, 2011. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  87. "Microsoft ropes two more OEMs into Android patent deal". Zdnet.com. Archived from the original on November 22, 2011. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  88. Tu, Janet I. (September 8, 2011). "Microsoft signs Android patent agreements with Acer, ViewSonic". Seattletimes.nwsource.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  89. Matussek, Karin (September 9, 2011). "Apple Wins German Ban on Samsung Tablet". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  90. "Latest Samsung lawsuit targets Apple's iPhone, iPad in France". AppleInsider. September 13, 2011. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  91. Meyer, David (September 14, 2011). "Apple sues Samsung in the UK over Android | ZDNet UK". Zdnet.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2011-12-24. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  92. "USPTO Assignments on the Web". Assignments.uspto.gov. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  93. "Samsung fires back at Apple in Australia with countersuit against iPhone, iPad". Appleinsider.com. 17 September 2011. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  94. "Microsoft and Samsung Broaden Smartphone Partnership: Agreements mark new initiatives to promote Windows Phone and share intellectual property". Microsoft.com. September 28, 2011. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  95. Our Licensing Deal with Samsung: How IP Drives Innovation and Collaboration - Microsoft on the Issues - Site Home - TechNet Blogs.
  96. Florian Mueller (September 28, 2011). "FOSS Patents: Samsung takes Android patent license from Microsoft rather than wait for Motorola". Fosspatents.blogspot.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  97. "Apple Wins Injunction Blocking Sale of Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia". Mac Rumors. October 12, 2011. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  98. "Microsoft and Quanta Computer Sign Patent Agreement Covering Android and Chrome-Based Devices - Redmond, Wash., Oct. 13, 2011 /PRNewswire/" (Press release). Washington: Prnewswire.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  99. Microsoft Inks Another Android Patent Deal, This Time With Quanta | TechCrunch.
  100. Levine, Dan (October 13, 2011). "U.S. judge says Samsung tablets infringe Apple patents". Reuters.com. Retrieved January 5, 2012.
  101. "Apple files German lawsuit against Samsung, targets Galaxy S II, nine other smartphones". Engadget. 17 January 2012.
  102. Brid-Aine, Parnell (March 7, 2012). "Samsung celebrates iPad 3 day by suing Apple AGAIN". theregister.co.uk. Retrieved July 30, 2012.
  103. Whittaker, Zach, Kodak sues, tells Apple: 'get off our patents', CNet, cnet.com.au, June 20, 2012. Accessed July 30, 2012.
  104. Graziano, Dan (February 10, 2012). "Apple sues Samsung over autocorrect patent".
  105. Brodkin, Jon (June 23, 2012). "In bid for patent sanity, judge throws out entire Apple/Motorola case". Ars Technica.
  106. "Samsung Appeals Apple Injunction Against Galaxy Tab". PCWorld. June 28, 2012.
  107. "Report: Apple Wins Injunction Against Galaxy Nexus". PCWorld. June 29, 2012.
  108. Musil, Steven. "Samsung appeals Apple's injunction against Galaxy Nexus". CNET.
  109. "Google's Nexus 7 tablet infringes Nokia patents | TheINQUIRER". www.theinquirer.net. July 2, 2012. Archived from the original on July 3, 2012.
  110. Souppouris, Aaron (July 4, 2012). "UK High Court rules three Apple patents invalid, vindicates HTC". The Verge.
  111. Fri, Jul 6th 2012 4:35pm-Mike Masnick (6 July 2012). "And So It's Come To This: Samsung/Google Forced To Degrade Features In Patent Dispute". Techdirt.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  112. "ITU wants to bring smartphone makers to peace talks, hash out patent wars". Engadget. 6 July 2012.
  113. "UK Judge says Galaxy Tab 'not as cool' as iPad, awards Samsung win in design suit". Engadget. 9 July 2012.
  114. Rodriguez, Salvador (July 10, 2012). "EMG Technology sues Google over its Chrome mobile Web browser". Los Angeles Times.
  115. "Blackberry maker RIM ordered to pay $147 million in patent lawsuit". Public Radio International.
  116. Elmer, Philip (2012-07-18). "Apple granted 'the mother of all smartphone software patents' - Apple 2.0 -Fortune Tech". Tech.fortune.cnn.com. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  117. Graziano, Dan (2012-07-18). "Apple wins 'mother of all smartphone software patents' – could spell trouble for Android - Yahoo News". News.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  118. Fiegerman, Seth. "A UK Judge Is Forcing Apple To Publish On Its Website That Samsung Didn't Copy Apple". Business Insider.
  119. "Apple Must Publish Notice Samsung Didn't Copy IPad in U.K". Bloomberg.
  120. "Apple Forced by UK to Print Public Apologies to Samsung for Design Theft Accusations". DailyTech. Archived from the original on 2014-01-10. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  121. Blagdon, Jeff (July 27, 2012). "Motorola Android devices banned in Germany for infringing Microsoft's FAT patent". The Verge.
  122. Gorman, Michael (25 August 2012). "Breaking down Apple's $1 billion courtroom victory over Samsung". Engadget.com. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  123. 1 2 "Apple Awarded $1.049 Billion In Damages As Jury Finds Samsung Infringed On Design And Software Patents". TechCrunch. 2012-08-24. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  124. "Apple emerges victorious in legal battle with Samsung; Jury awards damages of $1.05 billion". Networkworld.com. 2012-08-25. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  125. Tabuchi, Hiroko; Wingfield, Nick (August 31, 2012). "Samsung Wins a Patent Case Over Apple in Japan". The New York Times.
  126. Whitney, Lance (2014-03-13). "Appeals court nixes a Galaxy Nexus ban requested by Apple - CNET". News.cnet.com. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  127. Eisenhammer, Stephen (October 18, 2012). "Apple loses tablet copyright appeal against Samsung". Reuters. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  128. "Oh Sure, Now The Patent Office Realizes Apple's 'Rubberbanding' Patent Is Both Obvious And Not New". Techdirt. 2012-10-23. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  129. "Patent office tentatively invalidates Apple's rubber-banding patent used in Samsung trial". FOSS Patents. Retrieved October 19, 2012.
  130. Levine, Dan (November 6, 2012). "U.S. judge tosses Apple vs. Google lawsuit over patents". Reuters. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  131. Gustin, Sam (2012-11-12). "Patent Progress: What Apple and HTC's Landmark Pact Means for the Patent Wars". Time . Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  132. Fitchard, Kevin (November 27, 2012). "Samsung gets it from all sides". GigaOM. Archived from the original on November 28, 2012. Retrieved November 29, 2012.
  133. Bonnington, Christina (December 7, 2012). "Preliminary Patent Office Ruling Invalidates Apple's 'Steve Jobs Patent'". Wired magazine . Retrieved December 8, 2012.
  134. Brent Kendall (December 13, 2012). "Apple Loses Patent Case to Licensing Firm". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 13, 2012.
  135. "Scribd". Scribd.
  136. Hyunjoo Jin; Robert Birsel (December 26, 2012). "Samsung Elec seeks U.S. sales ban on some Ericsson products". Yahoo . Retrieved 26 December 2012.
  137. 1 2 3 "Apple vs. Samsung: Our Complete Patent Court Battle Timeline". Digital Trends. 4 April 2014. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
  138. Dan Levine (October 31, 2013). "Google, Samsung, Huawei sued over Nortel patents". Reuters.
  139. Joe Mullin (November 1, 2013). "Patent war goes nuclear: Microsoft, Apple-owned "Rockstar" sues Google". Ars Technica.
  140. Michelle Meyers (26 December 2013). "Google fights back against Rockstar patent group". CNET.
  141. Roger Cheng (February 7, 2014). "Giving peace a chance: HTC, Nokia settle suits in patent deal". CNET. Retrieved 28 June 2014.
  142. "Complaint" (PDF). PacerMonitor. Retrieved 21 December 2015.
  143. Microsoft sues Kyocera over cell phones, seeks U.S. injunction, Reuters
  144. Mann, Ronald (6 December 2016). "Opinion analysis: Justices tread narrow path in rejecting $400 million award for Samsung's infringement of Apple's cellphone design patents". SCOTUS Blog. Retrieved 14 December 2016.
  145. "IWNCOMM v. Sony: Recent Development in FRAND Litigation in China".
  146. "Iwncomm v. Sony: first SEP-based injunction granted in China | Lexology". www.lexology.com. Archived from the original on 2019-02-28. Retrieved 2019-02-28.
  147. "No exhaustion doctrine for "method-of-use" patents – Iwncomm v. Sony decision in China". Archived from the original on 2019-02-28. Retrieved 2019-02-28.
  148. Mueller, Eingestellt von Florian. "Samsung obtains U.S. antisuit injunction barring Huawei from enforcing two Chinese SEP injunctions".
  149. "Motion For Stay". CNET. Retrieved 22 February 2019.