Digital media use and mental health

Last updated

Digital media use and mental health
Adolescent smartphone.jpg
The relationships between digital media use and mental health are under study. [1]
Related Screen time, gaming disorder, problematic internet use, problematic social media use, problematic smartphone use

The relationships between digital media use and mental health have been investigated by various researchers—predominantly psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, and medical experts—especially since the mid-1990s, after the growth of the World Wide Web. A significant body of research has explored "overuse" phenomena, commonly known as "digital addictions", or "digital dependencies". These phenomena manifest differently in many societies and cultures. Some experts have investigated the benefits of moderate digital media use in various domains, including in mental health, and the treatment of mental health problems with novel technological solutions.

Psychologist professional who evaluates, diagnoses, treats, and studies behavior and mental processes

A psychologist studies normal and abnormal mental states, perceptual, cognitive, emotional, and social processes and behavior by experimenting with, and observing, interpreting, and recording how individuals relate to one another and to their environments. Most psychologists need a license to practice psychology. Typically, psychologists need a doctoral degree in psychology, although a master's degree is sufficient in some situations. Licensing and regulations can vary by country and profession.

An anthropologist is a person engaged in the practice of anthropology. Anthropology is the study of aspects of humans within past and present societies. Social anthropology, cultural anthropology, and philosophical anthropology study the norms and values of societies. Linguistic anthropology studies how language affects social life, while economic anthropology studies human economic behavior. Biological (physical), forensic, and medical anthropology study the biological development of humans, the application of biological anthropology in a legal setting, and the study of diseases and their impacts on humans over time, respectively.

Addiction state characterized by compulsive engagement in rewarding stimuli despite adverse consequences

Addiction is a brain disorder characterized by compulsive engagement in rewarding stimuli despite adverse consequences. Despite the involvement of a number of psychosocial factors, a biological process – one which is induced by repeated exposure to an addictive stimulus – is the core pathology that drives the development and maintenance of an addiction. The two properties that characterize all addictive stimuli are that they are reinforcing and intrinsically rewarding.

Contents

The delineation between beneficial and pathological use of digital media has not been established. There are no widely accepted diagnostic criteria, although some experts consider overuse a manifestation of underlying psychiatric disorders. The prevention and treatment of pathological digital media use is also not standardised, although guidelines for safer media use for children and families have been developed. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) does not include diagnoses for problematic internet use, problematic social media use, and gaming disorder (commonly known as video game addiction), whereas the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) recognises gaming disorder. Experts are still debating how and when to diagnose these conditions. The use of the term addiction to refer to these phenomena and diagnoses has also been questioned.

Pathology study and diagnosis of disease

Pathology is the study of the causes and effects of disease or injury. The word pathology also refers to the study of disease in general, incorporating a wide range of bioscience research fields and medical practices. However, when used in the context of modern medical treatment, the term is often used in a more narrow fashion to refer to processes and tests which fall within the contemporary medical field of "general pathology", an area which includes a number of distinct but inter-related medical specialties that diagnose disease, mostly through analysis of tissue, cell, and body fluid samples. Idiomatically, "a pathology" may also refer to the predicted or actual progression of particular diseases, and the affix path is sometimes used to indicate a state of disease in cases of both physical ailment and psychological conditions. A physician practicing pathology is called a pathologist.

Mental disorder Distressing thought or behavior pattern

A mental disorder, also called a mental illness or psychiatric disorder, is a behavioral or mental pattern that causes significant distress or impairment of personal functioning. Such features may be persistent, relapsing and remitting, or occur as a single episode. Many disorders have been described, with signs and symptoms that vary widely between specific disorders. Such disorders may be diagnosed by a mental health professional.

DSM-5 2013 update to the American Psychiatric Associations classification and diagnostic manual

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) is the 2013 update to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the taxonomic and diagnostic tool published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). In the United States, the DSM serves as the principal authority for psychiatric diagnoses. Treatment recommendations, as well as payment by health care providers, are often determined by DSM classifications, so the appearance of a new version has significant practical importance.

Digital media and screen time have changed how children think, interact and develop in positive and negative ways, but researchers are unsure about the existence of hypothesised causal links between digital media use and mental health outcomes. Those links appear to depend on the individual and the platforms they use. Several large technology firms have made commitments or announced strategies to try to reduce the risks of digital media use.

Screen time amount of time spent using a device such as a smartphone, computer, television, or video game console

Screen time is the amount of time spent using a device with a screen such as a smartphone, computer, television, or video game console. The concept is under significant research with related concepts in digital media use and mental health. Screen time use has increased over time leading to increased research in how screen time affects human health. Studies show that screen time directly impacts child development, and mental and physical health. The positive or negative health effects or screen time are influenced by levels and content of exposure. To prevent harmful exposure to screen time, some governments have placed regulations on its usage.

History and terminology

A young boy engaged with a smartphone Boysmartphone.jpg
A young boy engaged with a smartphone

The relationship between digital technology and mental health has been investigated from many perspectives. [2] [3] [4] Benefits of digital media use in childhood and adolescent development have been found. [5] Concerns have been expressed by researchers, clinicians and the public in regard to apparent compulsive behaviours of digital media users, as correlations between technology overuse and mental health problems become apparent. [2] [6] [7]

Compulsive behavior performing an act persistently and repetitively without it necessarily leading to an actual reward or pleasure

Compulsive behavior is defined as performing an act persistently and repetitively without it necessarily leading to an actual reward or pleasure. Compulsive behaviors could be an attempt to make obsessions go away. The act is usually a small, restricted and repetitive behavior, yet not disturbing in a pathological way. Compulsive behaviors are a need to reduce apprehension caused by internal feelings a person wants to abstain from or control. A major cause of the compulsive behaviors is said to be obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). "The main idea of compulsive behavior is that the likely excessive activity is not connected to the purpose to which it appears directed." Furthermore, there are many different types of compulsive behaviors including shopping, hoarding, eating, gambling, trichotillomania and picking skin, checking, counting, washing, sex, and more. Also, there are cultural examples of compulsive behavior.

Terminologies used to refer to compulsive digital-media-use behaviours are not standardised or universally recognised. They include "digital addiction", "digital dependence", "problematic use", or "overuse", often delineated by the digital media platform used or under study (such as problematic smartphone use or problematic internet use). [8] Unrestrained use of technological devices may affect developmental, social, mental and physical well-being and may result in symptoms akin to other psychological dependence syndromes, or behavioural addictions. [9] [7] The focus on problematic technology use in research, particularly in relation to the behavioural addiction paradigm, is becoming more accepted, despite poor standardisation and conflicting research. [10]

Problematic smartphone use Psychological dependence on smartphones

Problematic smartphone use also known as smartphone overuse, smartphone addiction, mobile phone overuse, or cell phone dependency, is proposed by some researchers to be a form of psychological or behavioral dependence on cell phones, closely related to other forms of digital media overuse such as social media addiction or internet addiction disorder. Other researchers have stated that terminology relating to behavioral addictions in regards to smartphone use can cause additional problems both in research and stigmatisation of users, suggesting the term to evolve to problematic smartphone use. Problematic use can include preoccupation with mobile communication, excessive money or time spent on mobile phones, use of mobile phones in socially or physically inappropriate situations such as driving an automobile. Increased use can also lead to increased time on mobile communication, adverse effects on relationships, and anxiety if separated from a mobile phone or sufficient signal.

Internet addiction disorder excessive internet use that causes psychological disorders.

Internet addiction disorder (IAD) also known as problematic internet use or pathological internet use is generally defined as problematic, compulsive use of the internet, that results in significant impairment in an individual's function in various life domains over a prolonged period of time. This and other relationships between digital media use and mental health have been under considerable research, debate and discussion amongst experts in several disciplines, and have generated controversy from the medical, scientific and technological communities. Such disorders can be diagnosed when an individual engages in online activities at the cost of fulfilling daily responsibilities or pursuing other interests, and without regard for the negative consequences.

Psychological dependence is a state that involves emotional–motivational withdrawal symptoms, e.g. anxiety and anhedonia, upon cessation of drug use or certain behaviours. It develops through frequent exposure to a psychoactive substance or behaviour, though behavioural dependence is less talked about. The specific mechanism involves a neuronal counter-adaption, which could be mediated through changes in neurotransmittor activity or altered receptor expression. Withdrawal symptoms can be attenuated by environmental enrichment and physical activity. Psychological dependence is not to be confused with physical dependence, which induces physical withdrawal symptoms upon discontinuation of use. However they are not mutually exclusive.

Internet addiction has been proposed as a diagnosis since the mid-1990s, [11] and social media and its relation to addiction has been examined since 2009. [12] A 2018 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report noted the benefits of structured and limited internet use in children and adolescents for developmental and educational purposes, but that excessive use can have a negative impact on mental well-being. It also noted an overall 40% increase in internet use in school-age children between 2010 and 2015, and that different OECD nations had marked variations in rates of childhood technology use, as well as differences in the platforms used. [13]

Social media are interactive computer-mediated technologies that facilitate the creation and sharing of information, ideas, career interests and other forms of expression via virtual communities and networks. The variety of stand-alone and built-in social media services currently available introduces challenges of definition; however, there are some common features:

  1. Social media are interactive Web 2.0 Internet-based applications.
  2. User-generated content, such as text posts or comments, digital photos or videos, and data generated through all online interactions, is the lifeblood of social media.
  3. Users create service-specific profiles and identities for the website or app that are designed and maintained by the social media organization.
  4. Social media facilitate the development of online social networks by connecting a user's profile with those of other individuals or groups.
OECD international economic organisation

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is an intergovernmental economic organisation with 36 member countries, founded in 1961 to stimulate economic progress and world trade. It is a forum of countries describing themselves as committed to democracy and the market economy, providing a platform to compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practices and coordinate domestic and international policies of its members. Most OECD members are high-income economies with a very high Human Development Index (HDI) and are regarded as developed countries. As of 2017, the OECD member countries collectively comprised 62.2% of global nominal GDP and 42.8% of global GDP at purchasing power parity. The OECD is an official United Nations observer.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has not formally codified problematic digital media use in diagnostic categories, but it deemed internet gaming disorder to be a condition for further study in 2013. [14] Gaming disorder, commonly known as video game addiction, has been recognised in the ICD-11. [15] [16] Different recommendations in the DSM and the ICD are due partly to the lack of expert consensus, the differences in emphasis in the classification manuals, as well as difficulties utilising animal models for behavioural addictions. [9]

The utility of the term addiction in relation to overuse of digital media has been questioned, in regard to its suitability to describe new, digitally mediated psychiatric categories, as opposed to overuse being a manifestation of other psychiatric disorders. [3] [4] Usage of the term has also been criticised for drawing parallels with substance use behaviours. Careless use of the term may cause more problems—both downplaying the risks of harm in seriously affected people, as well as overstating risks of excessive, non-pathological use of digital media. [4] The evolution of terminology relating excessive digital media use to problematic use rather than addiction was encouraged by Panova and Carbonell, psychologists at Ramon Llull University, in a 2018 review. [17]

Due to the lack of recognition and consensus on the concepts used, diagnoses and treatments are difficult to standardise or develop. Heightened levels of public anxiety around new media (including social media, smartphones and video games) further obfuscate population-based assessments, as well as posing management dilemmas. [3] Radesky and Christakis, the 2019 editors of JAMA Paediatrics , published a review that investigated "concerns about health and developmental/behavioural risks of excessive media use for child cognitive, language, literacy, and social-emotional development." [18] Due to the ready availability of multiple technologies to children worldwide, the problem is bi-directional, as taking away digital devices may have a detrimental effect, in areas such as learning, family relationship dynamics, and overall development. [19]

Problematic use

Though associations have been observed between digital media use and mental health symptoms or diagnoses, causality has not been established; nuances and caveats published by researchers are often misunderstood by the general public, or misrepresented by the media. [4] Females are more likely to overuse social media, and males video games. [20] Following from this, problematic digital media use may not be singular constructs, may be delineated based on the digital platform used, or reappraised in terms of specific activities (rather than addiction to the digital medium). [21]

Mental health

A 2019 systematic map of reviews suggested associations between some types of potentially problematic internet use and psychiatric or behavioural problems such as depression, anxiety, hostility, aggression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The studies could not determine if causal relationships exist, reviewers emphasising the importance of future prospective study designs. [2] While overuse of digital media has been associated with depressive symptoms, digital media may also be utilized in some situations to improve mood. [22] [23] Symptoms of ADHD have been positively correlated with digital media use in a large prospective study. [24] The ADHD symptom of hyperfocus may cause affected people to overuse digital media such as video games or online chatting. [25]

A 2016 technical report by Chassiakos, Radesky, and Christakis identified benefits and concerns in adolescent mental health regarding digital media use. It showed that the manner of social media use was the key factor, rather than the amount of time engaged. A decline in well-being and life-satisfaction was found in older adolescents who passively consumed social media, but these were not apparent in those who were more actively engaged. The report also found a U-shaped curvilinear relationship in the amount of time spent on digital media, with risk of depression increasing at both the low and high ends of internet use. [5] A 2018 review into the Chinese social media platform WeChat found associations of self-reported mental health symptoms with excessive platform use. However, the motivations and usage patterns of WeChat users affected overall psychological health, rather than the amount of time spent using the platform. [7] In the United Kingdom, a study of 1,479 individuals aged 14–24 compared psychological benefits and problems for five large social media platforms: Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter and YouTube. It concluded that YouTube was the only platform with a net positive rating "based on the 14 health and wellbeing-related questions", and the other platforms measured had net negative ratings, Instagram having the lowest rating. The study identified Instagram as having some positive effects including self-expression, self-identity, and community, but found that these were outweighed by the negative effects, specifically on sleep, body image, and "fear of missing out". [26]

A report published in Clinical Psychological Science in 2018 featured two cross-sectional surveys of 506,820 American high school students, and found that use of digital media was associated with higher rates of depressive symptoms and suicidality. They concluded that more time engaged with electronic devices, and less time on "non-screen activities" (such as in-person social interaction, sports/exercise, homework, and attending religious services) was correlated with depressive symptoms and suicide-related outcomes (suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts), especially among girls. [27] A later report in the same publication questioned the survey's research methodology, citing "inaccurate research measurements, negligible correlations between the main variables, [and] insufficient and inadequate statistical analyses". [28]

The relationship between bipolar disorder and technology use has been investigated in a singular survey of 84 participants for Computers in Human Behavior . The survey found marked variations in technology use based on self-reported mood states. The authors of the report then postulated that for patients with bipolar disorder, technology may be a "double-edged sword", with potential benefits and harms. [29]

Screen time

A systematic examination of reviews, published in 2019, concluded that evidence, although of mainly low to moderate quality, showed an association of screen time with a variety of health problems including: "adiposity, unhealthy diet, depressive symptoms and quality of life". They also concluded that moderate use of digital media may have benefits for young people in terms of social integration, a curvilinear relationship found with both depressive symptoms and overall well-being. [6]

A 2017 UK large-scale study of the "Goldilocks hypothesis"—of avoiding both too much and too little digital media use [30] —was described as the "best quality" evidence to date by experts and non-government organisations (NGOs) reporting to a 2018 UK parliamentary committee. That study concluded that modest digital media use may have few adverse affects, and some positive associations in terms of well-being. [1]

Proposed diagnostic categories

Gaming disorder has been considered by the DSM-5 task force as warranting further study (as the subset internet gaming disorder), and was included in the ICD-11. [14] Concerns have been raised by Aarseth and colleagues over this inclusion, particularly in regard to stigmatisation of heavy gamers. [31]

Christakis has asserted that internet addiction may be "a 21st century epidemic". [32] In 2018, he commented that childhood Internet overuse may be a form of "uncontrolled experiment[s] on [...] children". [33] International estimates of the prevalence of internet overuse have varied considerably, with marked variations by nation. A 2014 meta-analysis of 31 nations yielded an overall worldwide prevalence of six percent. [34] A different perspective in 2018 by Musetti and colleagues reappraised the internet in terms of its necessity and ubiquity in modern society, as a social environment, rather than a tool, thereby calling for the reformulation of the internet addiction model. [35]

Some medical and behavioural scientists recommend adding a diagnosis of "social media addiction" (or similar) to the next Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders update. [36] [37] [7] A 2015 review concluded there was a probable link between basic psychological needs and social media addiction. "Social network site users seek feedback, and they get it from hundreds of people—instantly. It could be argued that the platforms are designed to get users 'hooked'." [38]

Internet sex addiction, also known as cybersex addiction, has been proposed as a sexual addiction characterised by virtual internet sexual activity that causes serious negative consequences to one's physical, mental, social, and/or financial well-being. [39] [40] It may be considered a form of problematic internet use. [41]

Windfalls from online gambling may have psychological consequences. Money from computer.jpg
Windfalls from online gambling may have psychological consequences.

Online problem gambling

A 2015 review found evidence of higher rates of mental health comorbidities, as well as higher amounts of substance use, among internet gamblers, compared to non-internet gamblers. Causation, however, has not been established. The review postulates that there may be differences in the cohorts between internet and land-based problem gamblers. [43]

Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying, bullying or harassment using social media or other electronic means, has been shown to have effects on mental health. Victims may have lower self-esteem, increased suicidal ideation, and a variety of emotional responses, including being scared, frustrated, angry, anxious or depressed. [44]

According to the EU Kids Online project, the incidence of cyberbullying across seven European countries in children aged 8–16 increased from 8% to 12% between 2010 and 2014. Similar increases were shown in the United States and Brazil. [45]

Media multitasking

Concurrent use of multiple digital media streams, commonly known as media multitasking, has been shown to be associated with depressive symptoms, social anxiety, impulsivity, sensation seeking, lower perceived social success and neuroticism. [46] A 2018 review found that while the literature is sparse and inconclusive, overall, heavy media multitaskers also have poorer performance in several cognitive domains. [47] One of the authors commented that the data does not "unambiguously show that media multitasking causes a change in attention and memory", therefore it is possible to argue that it is inefficient to multitask on digital media. [48]

Assessment and treatment

Rigorous, evidence-based assessment of problematic digital media use is yet to be comprehensively established. This is due partially to a lack of consensus around the various constructs and lack of standardization of treatments. [49] The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has developed a Family Media Plan, intending to help parents assess and structure their family's use of electronic devices and media more safely. It recommends limiting entertainment screen time to two hours or less per day. [50] [51] The Canadian Paediatric Society produced a similar guideline. Ferguson, a psychologist, has criticised these and other national guidelines for not being evidence-based. [52] Other experts, cited in a 2017 UNICEF Office of Research literature review, have recommended addressing potential underlying problems rather than arbitrarily enforcing screen time limits. [4]

Different methodologies for assessing pathological internet use have been developed, mostly self-report questionnaires, but none have been universally recognised as a gold standard. [53] For gaming disorder, both the American Psychiatric Association [54] and the World Health Organization (through the ICD-11) [15] have released diagnostic criteria.

There is some limited evidence of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy and family-based interventions for treatment. In randomised controlled trials, medications have not been shown to be effective. [49] A 2016 study of 901 adolescents suggested mindfulness may assist in preventing and treating problematic internet use. [55] A 2019 UK parliamentary report deemed parental engagement, awareness and support to be essential in developing "digital resilience" for young people, and to identify and manage the risks of harm online. [1] Treatment centers have proliferated in some countries, and China and South Korea have treated digital dependence as a public health crisis, opening 300 and 190 centers nationwide, respectively. [56] Other countries have also opened treatment centers. [57] [58]

NGOs, support and advocacy groups provide resources to people overusing digital media, with or without codified diagnoses, [59] [60] including the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. [61] [62]

Mental health benefits

Smartphones and other digital devices are ubiquitous in many societies. Digital media use.jpg
Smartphones and other digital devices are ubiquitous in many societies.

Individuals with mental illness can develop social connections over social media, that may foster a sense of social inclusion in online communities. [5] Sufferers of mental illness may share personal stories in a perceived safer space, as well as gaining peer support for developing coping strategies. [5] People with mental illness are likely to report avoiding stigma and gaining further insight into their mental health condition by using social media. This comes with the risk of unhealthy influences, misinformation, and delayed access to traditional mental health outlets. [5]

Other benefits include connections to supportive online communities, including illness or disability specific communities, as well as the LGBTQI community. Furthermore, in children, the educational benefits of digital media use are well established. [5]

Other disciplines

Digital anthropology

Daniel Miller from University College London has contributed to the study of digital anthropology, especially ethnographic research on the use and consequences of social media and smartphones as part of the everyday life of ordinary people around the world. He notes the effects of social media are very specific to individual locations and cultures. He contends "a layperson might dismiss these stories as superficial. But the anthropologist takes them seriously, empathetically exploring each use of digital technologies in terms of the wider social and cultural context." [63]

Digital anthropology is a developing field which studies the relationship between humans and digital-era technology. It aims to consider arguments in terms of ethical and societal scopes, rather than simply observing technological changes. [64] Brian Solis, a digital analyst and anthropologist, stated in 2018, "we've become digital addicts: it's time to take control of technology and not let tech control us". [65]

Digital sociology

Digital sociology explores how people utilise digital media using several research methodologies, including surveys, interviews, focus groups, and ethnographic research. It intersects with digital anthropology, and studies cultural geography. It also investigates longstanding concerns, and contexts around young people's overuse of "these technologies, their access to online pornography, cyber bullying or online sexual predation". [66]

A 2012 cross-sectional sociological study in Turkey showed differences in patterns of internet use that related to levels of religiosity in 2,698 subjects. With increasing religiosity, negative attitudes towards internet use increased. Highly religious people showed different motivations for internet use, predominantly searching for information. [67] A study of 1,296 Malaysian adolescent students found an inverse relationship between religiosity and internet addiction tendency in females, but not males. [68]

A 2018 review published in Nature considered that young people may have different experiences online, depending on their socio-economic background, noting lower-income youths may spend up to three hours more per day using digital devices, compared to higher-income youths. [69] They theorised that lower-income youths, who are already vulnerable to mental illness, may be more passive in their online engagements, being more susceptible to negative feedback online, with difficulty self-regulating their digital media use. It concluded that this may be a new form of digital divide between at-risk young people and other young people, pre-existing risks of mental illness becoming amplified among the already vulnerable population. [69]

Neuroscience

Dar Meshi and colleagues noted in 2015 that "[n]euroscientists are beginning to capitalise on the ubiquity of social media use to gain novel insights about social cognitive processes". [70] A 2018 neuroscientific review published in Nature found the density of the amygdala, a brain region involved in emotional processing, is related to the size of both offline and online social networks in adolescents. They considered that this and other evidence "suggests an important interplay between actual social experiences, both offline and online, and brain development". The authors postulated that social media may have benefits, namely social connections with other people, as well as managing impressions people have of other people such as "reputation building, impression management, and online self-presentation". It identified "adolescence [as] a tipping point in development for how social media can influence their self-concept and expectations of self and others", and called for further study into the neuroscience behind digital media use and brain development in adolescence. [71] Although brain-imaging modalities are under study, neuroscientific findings in individual studies often fail to be replicated in future studies, similar to other behavioural addictions; as of 2017, the exact biological or neural processes that could lead to excessive digital media use are unknown. [4]

Digital mental health care

"Wellmind", a United Kingdom National Health Service smartphone application Wellmind NHS Mental Health App.jpg
"Wellmind", a United Kingdom National Health Service smartphone application

Digital technologies have also provided opportunities for delivery of mental health care online; benefits have been found with computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety. [72] Research of digital health interventions in young people is preliminary, with a meta-review unable to draw firm conclusions because of problems in research methodology. [73] Potential benefits according to one review include "the flexibility, interactivity, and spontaneous nature of mobile communications [...] in encouraging persistent and continual access to care outside clinical settings". [74] Mindfulness based online intervention has been shown to have small to moderate benefits on mental health. The greatest effect size was found for the reduction of psychological stress. Benefits were also found regarding depression, anxiety, and well-being. [75] Smartphone applications have proliferated in many mental health domains, with "demonstrably effective" recommendations listed in a 2016 review encouraging cognitive behavioural therapy, addressing both anxiety and mood. The review did however call for more randomised controlled trials to validate the effectiveness of their recommendations when delivered by digital apps. [72]

The Lancet commission on global mental health and sustainability report from 2018 evaluated both benefits and harms of technology. It considered the roles of technologies in mental health, particularly in public education; patient screening; treatment; training and supervision; and system improvement. [76]

Industry and government

Several technology firms have implemented changes intending to mitigate the adverse effects of excessive use of their platforms, and in Japan, China and South Korea legislative and/or regulatory governmental efforts have been enacted to address the interrelated issues.

In December 2017, Facebook admitted passive consumption of social media could be harmful to mental health, although they said active engagement can have a positive effect. In January 2018, the platform made major changes to increase user engagement. [77] In January 2019, Facebook's then head of global affairs, Nick Clegg, responding to criticisms of Facebook and mental health concerns, stated they would do "whatever it takes to make this environment safer online especially for youngsters". Facebook admitted "heavy responsibilities" to the global community, and invited regulation by governments. [78] In 2018 Facebook and Instagram announced new tools that they asserted may assist with overuse of their products. [79] In 2019, Instagram, which has been investigated specifically in one study in terms of addiction, [80] began testing a platform change in Canada to hide the number of "likes" and views that photos and videos received in an effort to create a "less pressurised" environment. [81] It then continued this trial in Australia, Italy, Ireland, Japan, Brazil and New Zealand. [82] The platform also developed artificial intelligence to counter cyberbullying. [83]

China's Ministry of Culture has enacted several public health efforts from as early as 2006 to address gaming and internet-related disorders. In 2007, an "Online Game Anti-Addiction System" was implemented for minors, restricting their use to 3 hours or less per day. The ministry also proposed a "Comprehensive Prevention Program Plan for Minors’ Online Gaming Addiction" in 2013, to promulgate research, particularly on diagnostic methods and interventions. [84] China's Ministry of Education in 2018 announced that new regulations would be introduced to further limit the amount of time spent by minors in online games. [85] [86] In response, Tencent, the owner of WeChat and the world's largest video game publisher, restricted the amount of time that children could spend playing one of its online games, to one hour per day for children 12 and under, and two hours per day for children aged 13–18. [87]

In 2018, Alphabet Inc. released an update for Android smartphones, including a dashboard app enabling users to set timers on application use. [88] Apple Inc. purchased a third-party application and then incorporated it in iOS 12 to measure "screen time". [89] Journalists have questioned the functionality of these products for users and parents, as well as the companies' motivations for introducing them. [88] [90] Alphabet has also invested in a mental health specialist, Quartet, which uses machine learning to collaborate and coordinate digital delivery of mental health care. [91]

South Korea has eight government ministries responsible for public health efforts in relation to internet and gaming disorders, a review article published in Prevention Science in 2018 stating that the "region is unique in that its government has been at the forefront of prevention efforts, particularly in contrast to the United States, Western Europe, and Oceania." [84] Efforts are coordinated by the Ministry of Science and ICT, and include awareness campaigns, educational interventions, youth counselling centres, and promoting healthy online culture. [84]

Two institutional investors in Apple Inc., JANA Partners LLC and the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS), stated in 2018 that they "believe[d] both the content and the amount of time spent on phones need to be tailored to youths". They called on Apple Inc. to act before regulators and consumers potentially force them to do so. [92] [93] Apple Inc. responded that they have, "always looked out for kids, and [they] work hard to create powerful products that inspire, entertain, and educate children while also helping parents protect them online". The firm is planning new features that they asserted may allow them to play a pioneering role in regard to young people's health. [94]

Japan's Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications coordinates Japanese public health efforts in relation to problematic internet use and gaming disorder. Legislatively, the Act on Development of an Environment that Provides Safe and Secure Internet Use for Young People was enacted in 2008, to promote public awareness campaigns, and support NGOs to teach young people safe internet use skills. [84]

Related Research Articles

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Mental disorder categorized by impulsive behavior, difficulty focusing, or excessive activity

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a mental disorder of the neurodevelopmental type. It is characterized by difficulty paying attention, excessive activity and acting without regards to consequences, which are otherwise not appropriate for a person's age. Individuals with ADHD can also display problems with regulating emotions. The symptoms appear before a person is twelve years old, are present for more than six months, and cause problems in at least two settings. In children, problems paying attention may result in poor school performance. Additionally there is an association with other mental disorders and substance misuse. Although it causes impairment, particularly in modern society, many people with ADHD can have sustained attention for tasks they find interesting or rewarding.

Substance abuse Use of a drug in amounts or by methods harmful to the user or others

Substance abuse, also known as drug abuse, is a patterned use of a drug in which the user consumes the substance in amounts or with methods which are harmful to themselves or others, and is a form of substance-related disorder. Widely differing definitions of drug abuse are used in public health, medical and criminal justice contexts. In some cases criminal or anti-social behaviour occurs when the person is under the influence of a drug, and long term personality changes in individuals may occur as well. In addition to possible physical, social, and psychological harm, use of some drugs may also lead to criminal penalties, although these vary widely depending on the local jurisdiction.

Computer addiction can be described as the excessive or compulsive use of the computer which persists despite serious negative consequences for personal, social, or occupational function. Another clear conceptualization is made by Block, who stated that "Conceptually, the diagnosis is a compulsive-impulsive spectrum disorder that involves online and/or offline computer usage and consists of at least three subtypes: excessive gaming, sexual preoccupations, and e-mail/text messaging". While it was expected that this new type of addiction would find a place under the compulsive disorders in the DSM-5, the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, it is still counted as an unofficial disorder. The concept of computer addiction is broadly divided into two types, namely offline computer addiction and online computer addiction. The term offline computer addiction is normally used when speaking about excessive gaming behavior, which can be practiced both offline and online. Online computer addiction, also known as Internet addiction, gets more attention in general from scientific research than offline computer addiction, mainly because most cases of computer addiction are related to the excessive use of the Internet.

Pornography addiction is an addiction model of compulsive sexual activity with concurrent use of pornographic material, despite negative consequences to one's physical, mental, social, or financial well-being. Neither the DSM-5 nor the ICD-11 classify pornography as a mental disorder or addiction. A

eHealth is a relatively recent healthcare practice supported by electronic processes and communication, dating back to at least 1999. Usage of the term varies. A study in 2005 found 51 unique definitions. Some argue that it is interchangeable with health informatics with a broad definition covering electronic/digital processes in health while others use it in the narrower sense of healthcare practice using the Internet. It can also include health applications and links on mobile phones, referred to as mHealth or m-Health.

Video game addiction addiction to computer and video games

Video game addiction also known as gaming disorder or internet gaming disorder is generally defined as problematic, compulsive use of video and/or internet games, that results in significant impairment to an individual's ability to function in various life domains over a prolonged period of time. This and associated concepts have been the subject of considerable research, debate and discussion among experts in several disciplines and generated controversy within the medical, scientific and gaming communities. Such disorders can be diagnosed when an individual engages in gaming activities at the cost of fulfilling daily responsibilities or pursuing other interests without regard for the negative consequences.

College health is a field of medicine that exclusively deals with the medical care and health behaviors of college- and university-age students. Although many colleges and universities worldwide offer student health services, there remains institutional diversity in the healthcare resources available, with models of student health ranging from first aid stations employing a single nurse to large multi-specialty clinics run by hundreds of employees. The field of college health is multidisciplinary, as health professionals offering services include physicians, physician assistants, administrators, nurses, nurse practitioners, mental health professionals, health educators, athletic trainers, dietitians and nutritionists, and pharmacists. Some college health services extend to include massage therapists and other holistic health professionals.

Nomophobia phobia

Nomophobia is a proposed name for the phobia of being out of cellular phone contact. It has been considered as a symptom or syndrome of problematic digital media use in mental health, the definitions of which are not standardized.

Behavioral addiction is a form of addiction that involves a compulsion to engage in a rewarding non-substance-related behavior – sometimes called a natural reward – despite any negative consequences to the person's physical, mental, social or financial well-being. A gene transcription factor known as ΔFosB has been identified as a necessary common factor involved in both behavioral and drug addictions, which are associated with the same set of neural adaptations in the reward system.

The use of electronic and communication technologies as a therapeutic aid to healthcare practices is commonly referred to as telemedicine or eHealth. The use of such technologies as a supplement to mainstream therapies for mental disorders is an emerging mental health treatment field which, it is argued, could improve the accessibility, effectiveness and affordability of mental health care. Mental health technologies used by professionals as an adjunct to mainstream clinical practices include email, SMS, virtual reality, computer programs, blogs, social networks, the telephone, video conferencing, computer games, instant messaging and podcasts.

Problematic social media use A proposed medical diagnosis related to overuse of social media

Problematic social media use, also known as social media addiction or social media overuse, is a proposed form of psychological or behavioral dependence on social media platforms, similar to gaming disorder, Internet addiction disorder, and other forms of digital media overuse. It is generally defined as the problematic, compulsive use of social media platforms that results in significant impairment in an individual's function in various life domains over a prolonged period. This and other relationships between digital media use and mental health have been considerably researched, debated, and discussed among experts in several disciplines, and have generated controversy in medical, scientific, and technological communities. Research suggests that it affects women and girls more than boys and men and that it appears to affect individuals based on the social media platform used. Such disorders can be diagnosed when an individual engages in online activities at the cost of fulfilling daily responsibilities or pursuing other interests, and without regard for the negative consequences.

The Problem Video Game Playing Questionnaire is a scale measured by using a survey containing nine yes-or-no questions. It is designed to measure the disorder commonly referred to as video game addiction. The creators of the scale and accompanying survey are Dr. Ricardo Tejeiro-Salguero, a researcher at the University of Liverpool, and Dr. Rosa María Bersabé-Moran, a Psychology professor at the University of Málaga.

Digital detox refers to a period of time when a person voluntarily refrains from using digital devices such as smartphones, computers, and social media platforms. This form of detoxification has gained popularity, as individuals have increased their time spent on digital devices and the Internet.

Thorsten Quandt is the professor of online communication at the University of Münster, Germany. He has a particular interest in online communication, digital games and (online) journalism. He (co)authored more than 150 scientific articles and several books, including Participatory Journalism, which was influential in establishing the citizen journalism model. He has edited numerous books, primarily in the field of online media and digital games research, including the books Multiplayer and The Video Game Debate. His work was awarded with several scientific prizes, including international Top Paper Awards, the dissertation award of the German Communication Association, and an ERC grant.

The effect of social media on adolescents has been studied increasingly as social media have become more prevalent. By using social media, adolescents can develop issues associated with mental health, but positive effects are also present.

Mental health in South Korea

Mental health issues are prevalent in South Korea, with the second highest suicide rate in the world and the highest rate of hospitalizations for mental illness among OECD countries. South Korea has state-funded mental health services, the majority of which are inpatient hospital facilities, but they are largely underfunded and underutilized. Despite the prevalence of mental illness, social stigma remains prevalent throughout the South Korean population, which discourages sufferers from seeking treatment. Mental illness, while present across all demographic groups, is most common among the elderly and adolescents in South Korea.

Nancy M. Petry was a psychologist known for her research on behavioral treatments for addictive disorders, behavioral pharmacology, impulsivity and compulsive gambling. She was Professor of Medicine at the University of Connecticut Health Center. Petry served as a member of the American Psychiatric Association Workgroup on Substance Use Disorders for the DSM-5 and chaired the Subcommittee on Non-Substance Behavioral Addictions. The latter category includes Internet addiction disorder and problem gambling. She also served as a member of the Board of Advisors of Children and Screens: Institute of Digital Media and Child Development.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Impact of social media and screen-use on young people's health" (PDF). House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. 31 January 2019. Retrieved 12 May 2019.
  2. 1 2 3 Dickson K, Richardson M (1 January 2019). "Screen-based activities and children and young people's mental health: A Systematic Map of Reviews" (PDF). Department of Health Reviews Facility. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 February 2019. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
  3. 1 2 3 Ryding FC, Kaye LK (2018). ""Internet Addiction": a Conceptual Minefield". International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 16 (1): 225–232. doi:10.1007/s11469-017-9811-6. PMC   5814538 . PMID   29491771.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kardefelt-Winther D (1 February 2017). "How does the time children spend using digital technology impact their mental well-being, social relationships and physical activity? – An evidence-focused literature review" (PDF). UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti. UNICEF Office of Research. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 July 2019. Retrieved 12 May 2019.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Reid Chassiakos YL, Radesky J, Christakis D, Moreno MA, Cross C (November 2016). "Children and Adolescents and Digital Media". Pediatrics . 138 (5): e20162593. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2593. PMID   27940795.
  6. 1 2 Stiglic N, Viner RM (January 2019). "Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: a systematic review of reviews". BMJ Open . 9 (1): e023191. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191. PMC   6326346 . PMID   30606703.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Montag C, Becker B, Gan C (2018). "The Multipurpose Application WeChat: A Review on Recent Research". Frontiers in Psychology. 9: 2247. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02247. PMC   6297283 . PMID   30618894.
  8. Stiglic N, Viner RM (January 2019). "Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: a systematic review of reviews". BMJ Open . 9 (1): e023191. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191. PMC   6326346 . PMID   30606703.
     Beales K, MacDonald F, Bartlett V, Bowden-Jones H (2017). Are we all addicts now? : digital dependence. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. ISBN   978-1-78694-081-0. OCLC   988053669.
     Pantic I (October 2014). "Online social networking and mental health". Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking. 17 (10): 652–657. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0070. PMC   4183915 . PMID   25192305.
     Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD (March 2017). "Social Networking Sites and Addiction: Ten Lessons Learned". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 14 (3): 311. doi:10.3390/ijerph14030311. PMC   5369147 . PMID   28304359.
     Sigman A. "The Impact of Screen Media on Children: A Eurovision For Parliament" (PDF). Steiner Education Australia (reprint of original speech). Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 March 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2019.
  9. 1 2 Grant JE, Chamberlain SR (August 2016). "Expanding the definition of addiction: DSM-5 vs. ICD-11". CNS Spectrums. 21 (4): 300–303. doi:10.1017/S1092852916000183. PMC   5328289 . PMID   27151528.
  10. Ellis DA (1 August 2019). "Are smartphones really that bad? Improving the psychological measurement of technology-related behaviors". Computers in Human Behavior . 97: 60–66. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.006. ISSN   0747-5632.
  11. Young K (27 February 1998). Caught in the net : how to recognize the signs of Internet addiction--and a winning strategy for recovery. New York, New York: Wiley. ISBN   978-0-471-19159-9. OCLC   38130573.
  12. La Barbera D, La Paglia F, Valsavoia R (2009). "Social network and addiction". Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 144: 33–36. PMID   19592725.
  13. Cornford K (2018). "Children & Young People's Mental Health in the Digital Age" (PDF). OECD.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 January 2019. Retrieved 22 March 2019.
  14. 1 2 Parekh R. "Internet Gaming". The American Psychiatric Association. Archived from the original on 26 May 2019. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
  15. 1 2 "Gaming disorder". Gaming disorder. World Health Organization. September 2018. Archived from the original on 6 February 2019. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
  16. "ICD-11 – Mortality and Morbidity Statistics". icd.who.int. Archived from the original on 1 August 2018. Retrieved 11 May 2019.
  17. Panova T, Carbonell X (June 2018). "Is smartphone addiction really an addiction?". Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 7 (2): 252–259. doi:10.1556/2006.7.2018.49. PMC   6174603 . PMID   29895183.
  18. Radesky JS, Christakis DA (October 2016). "Increased Screen Time: Implications for Early Childhood Development and Behavior". Pediatric Clinics of North America . 63 (5): 827–839. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2016.06.006. PMID   27565361.
  19. Hsin C (2014). "The Influence of Young Children's Use of Technology on Their Learning: A Review". Journal of Educational Technology & Society . 17 (4): 85–99. JSTOR   jeductechsoci.17.4.85.
     Gordo López AJ, Contreras PP, Cassidy P (1 August 2015). "The [not so] new digital family: disciplinary functions of representations of children and technology". Feminism & Psychology. 25 (3): 326–346. doi:10.1177/0959353514562805.
     Subrahmanyam K, Kraut RE, Greenfield PM, Gross EF (22 September 2000). "The impact of home computer use on children's activities and development". The Future of Children . 10 (2): 123–144. doi:10.2307/1602692. JSTOR   1602692. PMID   11255703.
  20. Hawi N, Samaha M (August 2019). "Identifying commonalities and differences in personality characteristics of internet and social media addiction profiles: traits, self-esteem, and self-construal". Behaviour & Information Technology . 38 (2): 110–119. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1515984.
     Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD (March 2017). "Social Networking Sites and Addiction: Ten Lessons Learned". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 14 (3): 311. doi:10.3390/ijerph14030311. PMC   5369147 . PMID   28304359.
     Paulus, Frank W.; Ohmann, Susanne; Gontard, Alexander von; Popow, Christian (2018). "Internet gaming disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review". Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 60 (7): 645–659. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13754. ISSN   1469-8749. PMID   29633243.
  21. Hawi N, Samaha M (August 2019). "Identifying commonalities and differences in personality characteristics of internet and social media addiction profiles: traits, self-esteem, and self-construal". Behaviour & Information Technology . 38 (2): 110–119. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1515984.
     Paulus, Frank W.; Ohmann, Susanne; Gontard, Alexander von; Popow, Christian (2018). "Internet gaming disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review". Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 60 (7): 645–659. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13754. ISSN   1469-8749. PMID   29633243.
  22. Hoge E, Bickham D, Cantor J (November 2017). "Digital Media, Anxiety, and Depression in Children". Pediatrics . 140 (Suppl 2): S76–S80. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1758G. PMID   29093037.
  23. Elhai JD, Dvorak RD, Levine JC, Hall BJ (January 2017). "Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology". Journal of Affective Disorders . 207: 251–259. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030. PMID   27736736.
  24. Krull K (19 February 2019). "Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents, clinical features and diagnosis". UpToDate.com. UpToDate. Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 23 March 2019.
  25. Kooij JJ, Bijlenga D, Salerno L, Jaeschke R, Bitter I, Balázs J, et al. (February 2019). "Updated European Consensus Statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD". European Psychiatry . 56: 14–34. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.11.001. PMID   30453134.
  26. "#StatusOfMind – Social media and young people's mental health and wellbeing" (PDF). Royal Society for Public Health . Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 November 2018. Retrieved 10 January 2019.
  27. Twenge JM, Joiner TE, Rogers ML, Martin GN (2018). "Increases in Depressive Symptoms, Suicide-Related Outcomes, and Suicide Rates Among U.S. Adolescents After 2010 and Links to Increased New Media Screen Time". Clinical Psychological Science. 6 (1): 3–17. doi:10.1177/2167702617723376.
  28. Ophir Y, Lipshits-Braziler Y, Rosenberg H (May 2019). "New-Media Screen Time is Not (Necessarily) Linked to Depression: Comments on Twenge, Joiner, Rogers, and Martin (2018)". Clinical Psychological Science: 216770261984941. doi:10.1177/2167702619849412.
  29. Matthews M, Murnane E, Snyder J, Guha S, Chang P, Doherty G, Gay G (1 October 2017). "The double-edged sword: A mixed methods study of the interplay between bipolar disorder and technology use". Computers in Human Behavior . 75: 288–300. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.009.
  30. Przybylski AK, Weinstein N (February 2017). "A Large-Scale Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis" (PDF). Psychological Science . 28 (2): 204–215. doi:10.1177/0956797616678438. PMID   28085574. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 July 2018. Retrieved 24 June 2019.
  31. Aarseth E, Bean AM, Boonen H, Colder Carras M, Coulson M, Das D, et al. (September 2017). "Scholars' open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal". Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 6 (3): 267–270. doi:10.1556/2006.5.2016.088. PMC   5700734 . PMID   28033714.
  32. Christakis DA (October 2010). "Internet addiction: a 21st century epidemic?". BMC Medicine . 8 (1): 61. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-61. PMC   2972229 . PMID   20955578.
  33. Cooper A (9 December 2018). "Groundbreaking study examines effects of screen time on kids". 60 Minutes Canada. CBS News. Archived from the original on 11 December 2018. Retrieved 12 December 2018.
  34. Cheng C, Li AY (December 2014). "Internet addiction prevalence and quality of (real) life: a meta-analysis of 31 nations across seven world regions". Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking. 17 (12): 755–760. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0317. PMC   4267764 . PMID   25489876.
  35. Musetti A, Corsano P (18 April 2018). "The Internet Is Not a Tool: Reappraising the Model for Internet-Addiction Disorder Based on the Constraints and Opportunities of the Digital Environment". Frontiers in Psychology . 9: 558. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00558. PMC   5915628 . PMID   29720954.
  36. Pantic I (October 2014). "Online social networking and mental health". Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking. 17 (10): 652–657. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0070. PMC   4183915 . PMID   25192305.
  37. van den Eijnden RJ, Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM (1 August 2016). "The Social Media Disorder Scale". Computers in Human Behavior . 61: 478–487. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.038.
  38. Andreassen CS (1 June 2015). "Online Social Network Site Addiction: A Comprehensive Review" (PDF). Current Addiction Reports. 2 (2): 175–184. doi:10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9. ISSN   2196-2952. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 August 2017.
  39. Stein DJ, Hollander E, Rothbaum BO (31 August 2009). Textbook of Anxiety Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing. p. 359. ISBN   978-1-58562-254-2. Archived from the original on 11 October 2013. Retrieved 24 April 2010.
  40. Parashar A, Varma A (April 2007). "Behavior and substance addictions: is the world ready for a new category in the DSM-V?". CNS Spectr. 12 (4): 257, author reply 258–259. doi:10.1017/S109285290002099X. PMID   17503551.
  41. Griffiths M (November 2001). "Sex on the internet: Observations and implications for internet sex addiction". The Journal of Sex Research. 38 (4): 333–342. doi:10.1080/00224490109552104 . Retrieved 2 April 2013.
  42. "Psychology of gambling: Review paper | APS". www.psychology.org.au. Archived from the original on 29 August 2019. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
  43. Gainsbury SM (2015). "Online Gambling Addiction: the Relationship Between Internet Gambling and Disordered Gambling". Current Addiction Reports. 2 (2): 185–193. doi:10.1007/s40429-015-0057-8. PMC   4610999 . PMID   26500834.
  44.  Hinduja S, Patchin JW (2008). "Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization". Deviant Behavior . 29 (2): 129–156. doi:10.1080/01639620701457816.
     Hinduja S, Patchin JW (October 2007). "Offline consequences of online victimization: School violence and delinquency". Journal of School Violence . 6 (3): 89–112. doi:10.1300/J202v06n03_06.
     Hinduja S, Patchin JW (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. ISBN   978-1-4129-6689-4.
     Hinduja S, Patchin JW (2006). "Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying". Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice . 4 (2): 148–169. doi:10.1177/1541204006286288.
  45. Almuneef M, Anton-Erxleben K, Burton P (14 November 2016). Ending the torment : tackling bullying from the schoolyard to cyberspace. United Nations. Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Violence against Children. New York: United Nations Publications. p. 116. ISBN   978-9-2110-1344-3. OCLC   982286456.
  46. Uncapher MR, Lin L, Rosen LD, Kirkorian HL, Baron NS, Bailey K, et al. (November 2017). "Media Multitasking and Cognitive, Psychological, Neural, and Learning Differences". Pediatrics. 140 (Suppl 2): S62–S66. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1758D. PMC   5658797 . PMID   29093034.
  47. Uncapher MR, Wagner AD (October 2018). "Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current findings and future directions". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115 (40): 9889–9896. doi:10.1073/pnas.1611612115. PMC   6176627 . PMID   30275312.
  48. Huber J (29 October 2018). "How does media multitasking affect the mind?". Scope. Archived from the original on 31 May 2019. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  49. 1 2 Zajac K, Ginley MK, Chang R, Petry NM (December 2017). "Treatments for Internet gaming disorder and Internet addiction: A systematic review". Psychology of Addictive Behaviors . 31 (8): 979–994. doi:10.1037/adb0000315. PMC   5714660 . PMID   28921996.
  50. "How to Make a Family Media Use Plan". HealthyChildren.org. Archived from the original on 6 June 2019. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  51. Korioth T (12 December 2018). "Family Media Plan helps parents set boundaries for kids". AAP News. Archived from the original on 9 January 2019. Retrieved 9 January 2019.
  52. Ferguson CJ, Beresin E (1 June 2017). "Social science's curious war with pop culture and how it was lost: The media violence debate and the risks it holds for social science". Preventive Medicine . 99: 69–76. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.009. ISSN   0091-7435. PMID   28212816.
  53. Shaw M, Black DW (2008). "Internet addiction: definition, assessment, epidemiology and clinical management". CNS Drugs . 22 (5): 353–365. doi:10.2165/00023210-200822050-00001. PMID   18399706.
  54. Petry NM, Rehbein F, Gentile DA, Lemmens JS, Rumpf HJ, Mößle T, et al. (September 2014). "An international consensus for assessing Internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach". Addiction . 109 (9): 1399–1406. doi:10.1111/add.12457. PMID   24456155.
  55. Gámez-Guadix M, Calvete E (1 December 2016). "Assessing the Relationship between Mindful Awareness and Problematic Internet Use among Adolescents". Mindfulness . 7 (6): 1281–1288. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0566-0.
  56. Sharma MK, Palanichamy TS (February 2018). "Psychosocial interventions for technological addictions". Indian Journal of Psychiatry . 60 (Suppl 4): S541–S545. doi:10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_40_18 (inactive 28 October 2019). PMC   5844169 . PMID   29540928.
  57. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD (September 2011). "Online social networking and addiction – a review of the psychological literature". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 8 (9): 3528–3552. doi:10.3390/ijerph8093528. PMC   3194102 . PMID   22016701.
  58. Romano M, Osborne LA, Truzoli R, Reed P (7 February 2013). "Differential psychological impact of Internet exposure on Internet addicts". PLOS One . 8 (2): e55162. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...855162R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055162. PMC   3567114 . PMID   23408958.
  59. "Hooked on Social Media? Help From Adults with ADHD". ADDitude. ADDitude Magazine. 23 November 2016. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  60. "ADHD and Learning Disabilities Directory: ADD Coaches, Organizers, Doctors, Schools, Camps". directory.additudemag.com. Archived from the original on 9 January 2019. Retrieved 9 January 2019.
  61. "Resources Online". ADHD Australia. Archived from the original on 9 January 2019. Retrieved 9 January 2019.
  62. "ADHD Resource Center". www.aacap.org. Archived from the original on 9 January 2019. Retrieved 9 January 2019.
  63. Miller D. "The Anthropology of Social Media". Scientific American Blog Network. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  64. Miller D (28 August 2018). "Digital Anthropology". Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Archived from the original on 30 December 2018. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  65. Solis B (28 March 2018). "We've Become Digital Addicts: It's Time to Take Control of Technology and Not Let Tech Control Us". Medium. Archived from the original on 30 December 2018. Retrieved 6 January 2019.
  66. Lupton D (1 August 2012). "Digital Sociology: An Introduction" (PDF). ses.library.usyd.edu.au. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 April 2015. Retrieved 8 January 2019.
  67. Sanaktekin OH (20 December 2011). "The Effects of Religiosity on Internet Consumption". Information, Communication & Society . 16 (10): 1553–1573. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.722663.
  68. Charlton JP, Soh PC, Ang PH, Chew K (1 December 2013). "Religiosity, Adolescent Internet Usage Motives and Addiction". Information, Communication & Society . 16 (10): 1619–1638. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.735251. ISSN   1369-118X.
  69. 1 2 Odgers C (February 2018). "Smartphones are bad for some teens, not all". Nature . 554 (7693): 432–434. Bibcode:2018Natur.554..432O. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-02109-8. PMC   6121807 . PMID   29469108.
  70. Meshi D, Tamir DI, Heekeren HR (December 2015). "The Emerging Neuroscience of Social Media" (PDF). Trends in Cognitive Sciences . 19 (12): 771–782. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.004. PMID   26578288. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 July 2018. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  71. Crone EA, Konijn EA (February 2018). "Media use and brain development during adolescence". Nature Communications . 9 (1): 588. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9..588C. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03126-x. PMC   5821838 . PMID   29467362.
  72. 1 2 Bakker D, Kazantzis N, Rickwood D, Rickard N (March 2016). "Mental Health Smartphone Apps: Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Future Developments". JMIR Mental Health . 3 (1): e7. doi:10.2196/mental.4984. PMC   4795320 . PMID   26932350.
  73. Hollis C, Falconer CJ, Martin JL, Whittington C, Stockton S, Glazebrook C, Davies EB (April 2017). "Annual Research Review: Digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems – a systematic and meta-review" (PDF). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines . 58 (4): 474–503. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12663. PMID   27943285. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 July 2018. Retrieved 13 July 2019.
  74. Seko Y, Kidd S, Wiljer D, McKenzie K (September 2014). "Youth mental health interventions via mobile phones: a scoping review". Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking. 17 (9): 591–602. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0078. PMID   25007383.
  75. Spijkerman MP, Pots WT, Bohlmeijer ET (April 2016). "Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials". Clinical Psychology Review . 45: 102–114. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009. PMID   27111302.
  76. Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, Thornicroft G, Baingana F, Bolton P, et al. (October 2018). "The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development". The Lancet . 392 (10157): 1553–1598. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X. PMID   30314863.
  77. Levin S (15 December 2017). "Facebook admits it poses mental health risk – but says using site more can help". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 14 January 2019. Retrieved 15 January 2019.
  78. Rajan A (28 January 2019). "Can Nick Clegg help Facebook grow up?". BBC News . Archived from the original on 28 February 2019. Retrieved 27 February 2019.
  79. Booth C (1 August 2018). "Facebook and Instagram officially announce new tools to fight social media addiction". The Next Web. Archived from the original on 4 April 2019. Retrieved 19 December 2018.
  80. Kircaburun K, Griffiths MD (March 2018). "Instagram addiction and the Big Five of personality: The mediating role of self-liking". Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 7 (1): 158–170. doi:10.1556/2006.7.2018.15. PMC   6035031 . PMID   29461086.
  81. Shaban H (1 May 2019). "Here's why Instagram is going to hide your 'likes'". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on 5 May 2019. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
  82. Robertson H (18 July 2019). "Instagram hides 'likes' from more users". Yahoo! News . Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on 11 August 2019. Retrieved 11 August 2019.
  83. Steinmetz K (8 July 2018). "Inside Instagram's War on Bullying". Time . Archived from the original on 28 July 2019. Retrieved 7 August 2019.
  84. 1 2 3 4 King DL, Delfabbro PH, Doh YY, Wu AM, Kuss DJ, Pallesen S, et al. (February 2018). "Policy and Prevention Approaches for Disordered and Hazardous Gaming and Internet Use: an International Perspective" (PDF). Prevention Science. 19 (2): 233–249. doi:10.1007/s11121-017-0813-1. PMID   28677089.
  85. "State data to limit China child gamers". BBC News. 6 September 2018. Retrieved 18 September 2019.
  86. "A new notice from China's Ministry of Education, and its impact on games". Niko. Niko Partners. Retrieved 18 September 2019.
  87. Webb K (7 November 2018). "Video game addiction has sparked a culture war in China – and it's having huge repercussions for the world's biggest video game maker". Business Insider Australia. Retrieved 18 September 2019.
  88. 1 2 Haig M (10 May 2018). "Google wants to cure our phone addiction. How about that for irony? | Matt Haig". The Guardian . ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on 11 January 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2019.
  89. Ceres P (25 September 2018). "How to Use Apple's Screen Time Controls on iOS 12". Wired . ISSN   1059-1028. Archived from the original on 17 December 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  90. Haller S (27 August 2018). "Warning: Apple's new Screen Time could allow your child to watch NC-17 movies". USA Today . Archived from the original on 10 January 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2019.
  91. "Google invests in mental health specialist Quartet to expand machine learning team". Healthcare IT News. 4 January 2018. Retrieved 6 October 2019.
  92. Benoit D (7 January 2018). "iPhones and Children Are a Toxic Pair, Say Two Big Apple Investors". WSJ.com. Archived from the original on 8 January 2019. Retrieved 8 January 2019.
  93. "New Letter From JANA Partners and Calstrs to Apple Inc". thinkdifferentlyaboutkids.com. JANA Partners LLC. 4 June 2018. Archived from the original on 5 January 2019.
  94. Musil S. "Apple vows new parental controls amid child addiction fears". CNET. Archived from the original on 9 January 2019. Retrieved 9 January 2019.

Further reading