Computer rage

Last updated
Broken computer monitor 2007 broken computer 347361369.jpg
Broken computer monitor

Computer rage refers to negative psychological responses towards a computer due to heightened anger or frustration. [1] Examples of computer rage include cursing or yelling at a computer, slamming or throwing a keyboard or a mouse, and assaulting the computer or monitor with an object or weapon.

Contents

Notable cases

In April 2015, a Colorado man was cited for firing a gun within a residential area when he took his computer into a back alley and shot it eight times with a 9mm pistol. [2] When questioned, he told police that he had become so frustrated with his computer that he had "reached critical mass," and stated that after he had shot his computer, "the angels sung on high." [3] In 2007, a German man threw his computer out the window in the middle of the night, startling his neighbors. German police were sympathetic and did not press charges, stating, "Who hasn't felt like doing that?" [4] In 2006, the staged surveillance video "Bad Day", showing a man assaulting his computer at work, became a viral hit on the Internet, reaching over two million views. [5] Other instances of reported computer rage have ranged from a restaurant owner who threw his laptop into a deep fryer, to an individual who attempted to throw his computer out the window, but forgot that the window was closed. [6]

The Angry German Kid is a popular Internet meme that stems from a viral video from the mid-2000s where the protagonist screams at his computer for loading too slowly, and repeatedly hits the table with the keyboard, causing keys to fall off.

Prevalence

In 1999, it was speculated that computer rage had become more common than road rage in traffic, [7] but in a 2015 study, it was found that reported rates of anger when using a computer were lower than reported rates of anger while driving. However, reports of anger while driving or using computers were found to be far more common than anger in other situations. [8]

In a 2013 survey of American adults, 36% of respondents who reported experiencing computer issues, also reported that they had screamed, yelled, cursed, or physically assaulted their computers within the last six months. [9]

In 2009, a survey was conducted with British computer users about their experiences with computers. This survey found that 54% of respondents reported verbally abusing their computers, and 40% reported that they had become physically violent toward their computers. The survey also found that most users experienced computer rage three to four times a month. [10]

Differences in types of computer rage have also been found between different geographical regions. For example, one survey found that individuals from London have been found to be five times more likely to physically assault their computers, while those from Yorkshire and the Humber were found to be more likely to yell at their computers. [11] Differences have also been observed for age groups, as younger adults (18–24 years old) have reported more abusive behaviors in the face of computer frustration when compared to older adults (over 35 years old). [9] Individuals with less computer experience in particular have also been reported to experience increased feelings of anger and helplessness when it comes to computers, [12] but other research has argued that it is the self-efficacy beliefs about computers that are predictive of computer frustration, not the amount of computer experience or use. [13]

In 1999, Professor Robert J. Edelmann, a chartered clinical, forensic and health psychologist and a fellow of the British Psychological Society, was offering a special helpline in the UK for those with technology-related anger. [14] [7]

Causes

Computer factors

Users can experience computer anger and frustration for a number of reasons. American adults surveyed in 2013 reported that almost half (46%) of their computer problems were due to malware or computer viruses, followed by software issues (10%) and not enough memory (8%). [15] In another survey, users reported email, word processors, web browsing, operating system crashes, inability to locate features, and program crashes as frequent initiators of computer frustration. [16] These technical issues, paired with tight timelines, poor work progress, and failure to complete a computer task can create heightened computer anger and frustration. [10] [13] When this anger and frustration exceeds a person's control, it can turn into rage. [17]

Psychological factors

Research on emotion has shown that anger is often caused by interruptions of plans and expectations, especially through the violation of social norms. [18] This sense of anger can be magnified when the individual does not understand why they are unable to meet their goal or task at hand or why there was a violation of social norms. Psychologists have argued that this is particularly relevant to computer rage, as computer users interact with computers in a manner similar to how they interact with other people. [19] Thus, when computers fail to function in the face of incoming deadlines or an important task to accomplish, users can feel betrayed by the computer in the same way they can feel betrayed by other people. Specifically, when users fail to understand why their computer will not work properly, often in the times they need it to the most, it can invoke a sense of hostility as it is interpreted as a breach of social norms or a personal attack. [8] [12] Consistent with this finding, perceived betrayal by the computer can also elicit other negative emotions. One survey of US adults reported that 10% of users who experience computer issues experienced feeling helplessness, and 4% reported feeling victimized. In the same survey, 7% adults ages 18–34 reported that they had cried over their computer problems within the previous six months. [9]

Dangers and potential benefits

Computer rage can result in damaged property or physical injuries, as well as psychological harm. [17] Some experts have suggested that venting frustrations on the computer may have some benefits, but other experts disagree. For example, yelling at the computer has been suggested as a way to moderate one's anger to avoid the ill effects of anger suppression, [10] but new research has suggested that yelling can negatively affect health in itself. [12] Alternatively, releasing anger on a computer has been viewed as advantageous as it directs this rage at an object as opposed to another person, and can make individuals feel better afterwards. [17]

Prevention and management

In response to computer issues that invoke frustration, some experts have suggested walking away from the computer for 15 minutes to "cool off". [20] Other methods to prevent computer rage can be backing up computer data often, [21] increasing memory of the computer, [15] and even imagining pleasant images, such as petting an animal. [12] Adopting a goal of improving computer knowledge may also be beneficial, as users are less likely to report computer rage when they view the issue as a challenge and not as a setback. [16] If computer rage cannot be avoided, guidelines on how to rage with minimal consequences, such as wearing safety goggles and taking frustration out on older equipment, can be followed to reduce the likelihood of injury and significant property loss. [17]

Employers of staff who work with computers, often in situations where time is crucial, can take steps to prevent computer rage, such as making sure there is adequate software, and providing employees with anger management strategies. [22] Some computer technician companies have reported that, to reduce computer rage, their technicians are trained on how to work with customers in sensitive psychological states just as much as how to diagnose and fix technical issues. [23]

Designing computer interfaces to display more emotional support when errors occur, or provide therapy strategies, has also been suggested as a way to mitigate computer anger and rage. [13] The application of affective computing has been shown to effectively mitigate negative emotions connected to computer use. One study found that an interface that sought the user's feelings, provided empathy, and validated reported emotional states significantly reduced negative emotions associated with computer frustration for users. [24] Another study found that when error messages contain positive wording ("Great that the computer will soon work again") compared to negative wording ("This is frustrating") or a neutral error message, users exhibited more signs of happiness. [25]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anger</span> Intense hostile emotional state of mind

Anger, also known as wrath or rage, is an intense emotional state involving a strong uncomfortable and non-cooperative response to a perceived provocation, hurt or threat.

In psychology, a mood is an affective state. In contrast to emotions or feelings, moods are less specific, less intense and less likely to be provoked or instantiated by a particular stimulus or event. Moods are typically described as having either a positive or negative valence. In other words, people usually talk about being in a good mood or a bad mood. There are many different factors that influence mood, and these can lead to positive or negative effects on mood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anger management</span> Therapy for anger prevention and control

Anger management is a psycho-therapeutic program for anger prevention and control. It has been described as deploying anger successfully. Anger is frequently a result of frustration, or of feeling blocked or thwarted from something the subject feels is important. Anger can also be a defensive response to underlying fear or feelings of vulnerability or powerlessness. Anger management programs consider anger to be a motivation caused by an identifiable reason which can be logically analyzed and addressed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Road rage</span> Aggressive or angry behavior in road traffic

Road rage is aggressive or angry behavior exhibited by motorists. These behaviors include rude and verbal insults, yelling, physical threats or dangerous driving methods targeted at other drivers, pedestrians or cyclists in an effort to intimidate or release frustration. Road rage can lead to altercations, damage to property, assaults, and collisions that result in serious physical injuries or even death. Strategies include cutting motorists off, inappropriate honking, using obscene gestures, flipping off another driver, swerving, tailgating, brake checking, and attempting to fight.

The user experience (UX) is how a user interacts with and experiences a product, system or service. It includes a person's perceptions of utility, ease of use, and efficiency. Improving user experience is important to most companies, designers, and creators when creating and refining products because negative user experience can diminish the use of the product and, therefore, any desired positive impacts; conversely, designing toward profitability often conflicts with ethical user experience objectives and even causes harm. User experience is subjective. However, the attributes that make up the user experience are objective.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rage (emotion)</span> Feeling of intense or growing anger

Rage is intense, uncontrolled anger that is an increased stage of hostile response to a perceived egregious injury or injustice.

Cyberpsychology is a scientific inter-disciplinary domain that focuses on the psychological phenomena which emerge as a result of the human interaction with digital technology, particularly the Internet.

Emotional dysregulation is a range of emotional responses that do not lie within a desirable scope of emotive response, considering the stimuli.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wrap rage</span> Intense anger on failing to open packaging

Wrap rage, also called package rage, is the common name for heightened levels of anger and frustration resulting from the inability to open packaging, particularly some heat-sealed plastic blister packs and clamshells. People can be injured while opening difficult packaging: cutting tools pose a sharp hazard to the person opening the package, as well as to its contents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social media</span> Virtual online communities

Social media are interactive technologies that facilitate the creation, sharing and aggregation of content, ideas, interests, and other forms of expression through virtual communities and networks. Social media refers to new forms of media that involve interactive participation. While challenges to the definition of social media arise due to the variety of stand-alone and built-in social media services currently available, there are some common features:

  1. Social media are interactive Web 2.0 Internet-based applications.
  2. User-generated content—such as text posts or comments, digital photos or videos, and data generated through all online interactions—is the lifeblood of social media.
  3. Users create service-specific profiles for the website or app that are designed and maintained by the social media organization.
  4. Social media helps the development of online social networks by connecting a user's profile with those of other individuals or groups.

In the study of psychology, neuroticism has been considered a fundamental personality trait. In the Big Five approach to personality trait theory, individuals with high scores for neuroticism are more likely than average to be moody and to experience such feelings as anxiety, worry, fear, anger, frustration, envy, jealousy, pessimism, guilt, depressed mood, and loneliness. Such people are thought to respond worse to stressors and are more likely to interpret ordinary situations, such as minor frustrations, as appearing hopelessly difficult. The responses can include maladaptive behaviors, such as dissociation, procrastination, substance use, etc., which aids in relieving the negative emotions and generating positive ones.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emotion classification</span> Contrast of one emotion from another

Emotion classification, the means by which one may distinguish or contrast one emotion from another, is a contested issue in emotion research and in affective science. Researchers have approached the classification of emotions from one of two fundamental viewpoints:

  1. that emotions are discrete and fundamentally different constructs
  2. that emotions can be characterized on a dimensional basis in groupings
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human–computer interaction</span> Academic discipline studying the relationship between computer systems and their users

Human–computer interaction (HCI) is research in the design and the use of computer technology, which focuses on the interfaces between people (users) and computers. HCI researchers observe the ways humans interact with computers and design technologies that allow humans to interact with computers in novel ways. A device that allows interaction between human being and a computer is known as a "Human-computer Interface (HCI)".

User experience evaluation (UXE) or user experience assessment (UXA) refers to a collection of methods, skills and tools utilized to uncover how a person perceives a system before, during and after interacting with it. It is non-trivial to assess user experience since user experience is subjective, context-dependent and dynamic over time. For a UXA study to be successful, the researcher has to select the right dimensions, constructs, and methods and target the research for the specific area of interest such as game, transportation, mobile, etc.

The Media Equation is a general communication theory that claims people tend to assign human characteristics to computers and other media, and treat them as if they were real social actors. The effects of this phenomenon on people experiencing these media are often profound, leading them to behave and to respond to these experiences in unexpected ways, most of which they are completely unaware of.

Cyberpathology refers to the phenomena that "individuals can become overly attached to their computers, computer games, or the Internet and spend inordinate amounts of time in front of their monitors". It may cause physical and psychological damages to the individual, for examples, insufficient amount of sleep, limited face-to-face interactions, and impacting on daily life activities.

In psychology of art, the relationship between art and emotion has newly been the subject of extensive study thanks to the intervention of esteemed art historian Alexander Nemerov. Emotional or aesthetic responses to art have previously been viewed as basic stimulus response, but new theories and research have suggested that these experiences are more complex and able to be studied experimentally. Emotional responses are often regarded as the keystone to experiencing art, and the creation of an emotional experience has been argued as the purpose of artistic expression. Research has shown that the neurological underpinnings of perceiving art differ from those used in standard object recognition. Instead, brain regions involved in the experience of emotion and goal setting show activation when viewing art.

The study of the relationship between gender and emotional expression is the study of the differences between men and women in behavior that expresses emotions. These differences in emotional expression may be primarily due to cultural expectations of femininity and masculinity.

This article explains the positive and negative impacts to adolescents’ exposure to social media.

A functional account of emotions posits that emotions facilitate adaptive responses to environmental challenges. In other words, emotions are systems that respond to environmental input, such as a social or physical challenge, and produce adaptive output, such as a particular behavior. Under such accounts, emotions can manifest in maladaptive feelings and behaviors, but they are largely beneficial insofar as they inform and prepare individuals to respond to environmental challenges, and play a crucial role in structuring social interactions and relationships.

References

  1. Norman, Kent L. (October 21, 2004). "Computer Rage: Theory and Practice" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 19, 2015. Retrieved November 2, 2015.
  2. Grenoble, Ryan (2015-04-22). "Enraged Man Shoots Computer Eight Times". The Huffington Post . Retrieved 2015-11-03.
  3. "Colorado man ticketed for shooting his computer; says it was worth it". Los Angeles Times . 22 April 2015. Retrieved 2015-11-03.
  4. Veneziani, Vince (18 July 2007). "German Throws Computer Out Window, Escapes Fine". Tech Crunch . Retrieved 2018-02-04.
  5. "Viral Video Breakdown". 2013-07-25. Archived from the original on July 25, 2013. Retrieved 2015-11-17.
  6. "Drop the mouse and step away from the PC". msnbc.com. 2005-03-31. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
  7. 1 2 "Computer rage grows as millions misspent on IT". People Management Magazine . June 17, 1999. Archived from the original on July 3, 2017. Retrieved November 2, 2015.
  8. 1 2 Charlton, John P.; Kappas, Arvid; Swiderska, Aleksandra (2015). "Does computing anger have social elements? A comparison with driving anger". Behaviour & Information Technology. 34 (3): 294–303. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2014.895421. S2CID   11009573.
  9. 1 2 3 "Over A Third of Americans Confess to Verbal or Physical Abuse—of Their Computers: New Harris Study Reveals the Extent of Frustration, Anger and Helplessness Spurred by Computer Problems". Bulldog Reporter. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
  10. 1 2 3 Wardrop, Murray (April 2009). "'Computer rage' affects more than half of Britons". Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 2015-11-03.
  11. "Computer anger: Northerners shout, Southerners lash out | ZDNet". ZDNet . Retrieved 2015-11-17.
  12. 1 2 3 4 "No. It's Not OK Computer! Computer-Related Stress in the Workplace". Fresh Business Thinking. Archived from the original on 2018-03-04. Retrieved 2015-11-03.
  13. 1 2 3 Wilfong, Jeffery D. (2006-11-01). "Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs". Computers in Human Behavior. 22 (6): 1001–1011. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.020.
  14. "Employees Get 'It' Out Of Their Systems. Frustration levels with technology soar, according to new survey". Ipsos. 27 May 1999. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  15. 1 2 "Survey: Over A Third of Americans Confess to Verbal or Physical Abuse of Their Computers". Business Wire . 2013-07-30. Retrieved 2015-11-03.
  16. 1 2 Lazar, Jonathan; Jones, Adam; Hackley, Mary; Shneiderman, Ben. (December 23, 2004). "Severity and Impact of Computer User Frustration: A Comparison of Student and Workplace Users" (PDF). Interacting with Computers. 18 (2): 187–207. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.06.001. hdl: 1903/6496 . Retrieved November 10, 2015.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. 1 2 3 4 Norman, Kent L. (February 16, 2005). "Computer Rage: A Student Response to Frustration with Technology" (PDF). Laboratory for Automation Psychology, HCIL-V. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2016. Retrieved November 2, 2015.
  18. Averill, James R. (1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag New York. pp. XIV–402. ISBN   978-1-4612-5745-5.
  19. Nass, Clifford; Moon, Youngme (2000-01-01). "Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers". Journal of Social Issues. 56 (1): 81–103. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153. ISSN   1540-4560.
  20. "Drop the mouse and step away from the PC". msnbc.com. 2005-03-31. Retrieved 2015-11-03.
  21. Davia, Joy (June 3, 2005). "Got computer rage? Expert suggests safe ways to vent". USATODAY. Retrieved November 2, 2015.
  22. Charlton, John P. (2009-11-01). "The determinants and expression of computer-related anger" (PDF). Computers in Human Behavior. 25 (6): 1213–1221. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.001.
  23. Cha, Ariana Eunjung (2005-05-01). "Repair Teams Try to Calm 'Computer Rage'". The Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2015-11-03.
  24. Klein, J.; Moon, Y.; Picard, R. W. (2002-02-01). "This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results". Interacting with Computers. 14 (2): 119–140. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(01)00053-4. ISSN   0953-5438.
  25. Partala, Timo; Surakka, Veikko (2004-04-01). "The effects of affective interventions in human–computer interaction". Interacting with Computers. 16 (2): 295–309. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2003.12.001. ISSN   0953-5438.