MHealth

Last updated
Nurse using a mobile phone in Accra, Ghana Nurse in Ghana using mobile phone.png
Nurse using a mobile phone in Accra, Ghana

mHealth (also written as m-health or mhealth) is an abbreviation for mobile health, a term used for the practice of medicine and public health supported by mobile devices. [1] The term is most commonly used in reference to using mobile communication devices, such as mobile phones, tablet computers and personal digital assistants (PDAs), and wearable devices such as smart watches, for health services, information, and data collection. [2] The mHealth field has emerged as a sub-segment of eHealth, the use of information and communication technology (ICT), such as computers, mobile phones, communications satellite, patient monitors, etc., for health services and information. [3] mHealth applications include the use of mobile devices in collecting community and clinical health data, delivery/sharing of healthcare information for practitioners, researchers and patients, real-time monitoring of patient vital signs, the direct provision of care (via mobile telemedicine) as well as training and collaboration of health workers. [4] [5]

Contents

In 2019, the global market for mHealth apps was estimated at US$17.92 billion, with a compound annual growth rate of 45% predicted from 2020 to 2027. [6] While mHealth has application for industrialized nations, the field has emerged in recent years as largely an application for developing countries, stemming from the rapid rise of mobile phone penetration in low-income nations. The field, then, largely emerges as a means of providing greater access to larger segments of a population in developing countries, as well as improving the capacity of health systems in such countries to provide quality healthcare. [7] Within the mHealth space, projects operate with a variety of objectives, including increased access to healthcare and health-related information (particularly for hard-to-reach populations); improved ability to diagnose and track diseases; timelier, more actionable public health information; and expanded access to ongoing medical education and training for health workers. [3] [8]

Definitions

Malaria Clinic in Tanzania helped by SMS for Life program that uses cell phones to efficiently deliver malaria vaccine Saving Lives with SMS for Life.jpg
Malaria Clinic in Tanzania helped by SMS for Life program that uses cell phones to efficiently deliver malaria vaccine

mHealth broadly encompasses the use of mobile telecommunication and multimedia technologies as they are integrated within increasingly mobile and wireless health care delivery systems. The field broadly encompasses the use of mobile telecommunication and multimedia technologies in health care delivery. The term mHealth was coined by Robert Istepanian as use of "emerging mobile communications and network technologies for healthcare". [9] [ page needed ] A definition used at the 2010 mHealth Summit of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) was "the delivery of healthcare services via mobile communication devices". [10] The GSM Association representing the worldwide mobile communications industry published a report on mHealth in 2010 describing a new vision for healthcare and identified ways in which mobile technology might play a role in innovating healthcare delivery systems and healthcare system cost management. [11]

While there are some projects that are considered solely within the field of mHealth, the linkage between mHealth and eHealth is unquestionable. For example, an mHealth project that uses mobile phones to access data on HIV/AIDS rates would require an eHealth system in order to manage, store, and assess the data. Thus, eHealth projects many times operate as the backbone of mHealth projects. [3]

In a similar vein, while not clearly bifurcated by such a definition, eHealth can largely be viewed as technology that supports the functions and delivery of healthcare, while mHealth rests largely on providing healthcare access. [10] Because mHealth is by definition based on mobile technology such as smartphones, healthcare, through information and delivery, can better reach areas, people, and/or healthcare practitioners with previously limited exposure to certain aspects of healthcare. The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) has published a review of research on how mHealth and digital health technologies can help manage health conditions. [12]

Medical uses

mHealth apps are designed to support diagnostic procedures, to aid physician decision-making for treatments, and to advance disease-related education for physicians and people under treatment. [13] Mobile health has much potential in medicine and, if used in conjunction with human factors may improve access to care, the scope, and quality of health care services that can be provided. Some applications of mobile health may also improve the ability to improve accountability in healthcare and improve continuum of care by connecting interdisciplinary team members. [14] A dissemination strategy is required to drive potential users discover, download and use mHealth apps. mHealth apps can be disseminated via paid and unpaid marketing strategies using various communication channels. These channels include among others social media, e-mail, posters/flyers, radio and TV broadcasting. [15]

mHealth is one aspect of eHealth that is pushing the limits of how to acquire, transport, store, process, and secure the raw and processed data to deliver meaningful results. mHealth offers the ability of remote individuals to participate in the health care value matrix, which may not have been possible in the past. Participation does not imply just consumption of health care services. In many cases remote users are valuable contributors to gather data regarding disease and public health concerns such as outdoor pollution, drugs and violence.

While others exist, the 2009 UN Foundation and Vodafone Foundation [3] report presents seven application categories within the mHealth field: [7]

Education and awareness

Education and awareness programs within the mHealth field are largely about the spreading of mass information from source to recipient through short message services (SMS). In education and awareness applications, SMS messages are sent directly to users' phones to offer information about various subjects, including testing and treatment methods, availability of health services, and disease management. SMSs provide an advantage of being relatively unobtrusive, offering patients confidentiality in environments where disease (especially HIV/AIDS) is often taboo. Additionally, SMSs provide an avenue to reach far-reaching areas—such as rural areas—which may have limited access to public health information and education, health clinics, and a deficit of healthcare workers. [3] [8]

Helpline

Helpline typically consists of a specific phone number that any individual is able to call to gain access to a range of medical services. These include phone consultations, counseling, service complaints, and information on facilities, drugs, equipment, and/or available mobile health clinics. [3]

Diagnostic support, treatment support, communication and training for healthcare workers

Diagnostic and treatment support systems are typically designed to provide healthcare workers in remote areas advice about diagnosis and treatment of patients. While some projects may provide mobile phone applications—such as a step-by-step medical decision tree systems—to help healthcare workers diagnose, other projects provide direct diagnosis to patients themselves. In such cases, known as telemedicine, patients might take a photograph of a wound or illness and allow a remote physician to diagnose to help treat the medical problem. Both diagnosis and treatment support projects attempt to mitigate the cost and time of travel for patients located in remote areas. [3]

mHealth projects within the communication and training for healthcare workers subset involve connecting healthcare workers to sources of information through their mobile phone. This involves connecting healthcare workers to other healthcare workers, medical institutions, ministries of health, or other houses of medical information. Such projects additionally involve using mobile phones to better organize and target in-person training. Improved communication projects attempt to increase knowledge transfer amongst healthcare workers and improve patient outcomes through such programs as patient referral processes. [3] For example, the systematic use of mobile instant messaging for the training and empowerment of health professionals has resulted in higher levels of clinical knowledge and fewer feelings of professional isolation. [16]

Disease surveillance, remote data collection, and epidemic outbreak tracking

Projects within this area operate to utilize mobile phones' ability to collect and transmit data quickly, cheaply, and relatively efficiently. Data concerning the location and levels of specific diseases (such as malaria, HIV/AIDS, TB, Avian Flu) can help medical systems or ministries of health or other organizations identify outbreaks and better target medical resources to areas of greatest need. Such projects can be particularly useful during emergencies, in order to identify where the greatest medical needs are within a country [3]

Policymakers and health providers at the national, district, and community level need accurate data in order to gauge the effectiveness of existing policies and programs and shape new ones. In the developing world, collecting field information is particularly difficult since many segments of the population are rarely able to visit a hospital, even in the case of severe illness. A lack of patient data creates an arduous environment in which policy makers can decide where and how to spend their (sometimes limited) resources. While some software within this area is specific to a particular content or area, other software can be adapted to any data collection purpose.

Treatment support and medication compliance for patients

Remote monitoring and treatment support allows for greater involvement in the continued care of patients. Recent studies seem to show also the efficacy of inducing positive and negative affective states, using smart phones. [2] Within environments of limited resources and beds—and subsequently an 'outpatient' culture—remote monitoring allows healthcare workers to better track patient conditions, medication regimen adherence, and follow-up scheduling. Such projects can operate through either one- or two-way communications systems. Remote monitoring has been used particularly in the area of medication adherence for AIDS, [17] [18] cardiovascular disease, [19] [20] chronic lung disease, [20] diabetes, [21] [3] [22] antenatal mental health, [23] mild anxiety, [24] and tuberculosis. [17] Technical process evaluations have confirmed the feasibility of deploying dynamically tailored, SMS-based interventions designed to provide ongoing behavioral reinforcement for persons living with HIV. [25] among others. Specific mobile applications might also support adherence to taking medications. [26] [27]

In conclusion, the use of mobile phone technology (in combination with a web-based interface) in health care results in an increase in convenience and efficiency of data collection, transfer, storage and analysis management of data as compared with paper-based systems. Formal studies and preliminary project assessments demonstrate this improvement of efficiency of healthcare delivery by mobile technology. [28] Nevertheless, mHealth should not be considered as a panacea for healthcare. [29] Possible organizational issues include the ensuring of appropriate use and proper care of the handset, lost or stolen phones, and the important consideration of costs related to the purchase of equipment. There is therefore a difficulty in comparison in weighing up mHealth interventions against other priority and evidence-based interventions. [30]

Criticism and concerns

The extensive practice of mhealth research has sparked criticism, for example on the proliferation of fragmented pilot studies in low- and middle-income countries, which is also referred to as "pilotitis." [31] The extent of un-coordinated pilot studies prompted for instance the Ugandan Director General Health Services Dr Jane Ruth Aceng in 2012 to issue a notice that, "in order to jointly ensure that all eHealth efforts are harmonized and coordinated, I am directing that ALL eHealth projects/Initiatives be put to halt." [32] The assumptions that justify mhealth initiatives have also been challenged in recent sociological research. For example, mobile phones have been argued to be less widely accessible and usable than is often portrayed in mhealth-related publications; [33] people integrate mobile phones into their health behavior without external intervention; [34] and the spread of mobile phones in low- and middle-income countries itself can create new forms of digital and healthcare exclusion, which mhealth interventions (using mobile phones as a platform) cannot overcome and potentially accentuate. [35] Mhealth has also been argued to alter the practice of healthcare and patient-physician relationships as well as how bodies and health are being represented. [36] [37] Another widespread concern relates to privacy and data protection, for example in the context of electronic health records. [37] [38]

Studies looking into the perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare professionals using mheath have found that most health care professionals appreciated being connected to their colleagues, however some prefer face to face communication. [14] Some healthcare workers also felt that while reporting was improved and team members who require help or training could be more easily identified, some healthcare professionals did not feel comfortable being monitored continuously. [14] A proportion of healthcare professionals prefer paper reporting. [14] The use of mobile apps may sometimes lead to healthcare professionals spending more time performing additional tasks such as filling out electronic forms and may generate more workload in some cases. [14] Some healthcare professionals also do not feel comfortable with work-related contact from patients/clients outside of business hours (however some professionals did find this useful for emergencies). [14]

Communicating with clients/patients while using a mobile device may need to be considered. [14] A decrease in eye contact and the potential to miss non-verbal cues due to concentrating on a screen while speaking with patients is a potential consideration. [14]

Society and culture

Healthcare in low- and middle-income countries

Disability-adjusted life year for all causes per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004.
.mw-parser-output .refbegin{margin-bottom:0.5em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul{margin-left:0}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul>li{margin-left:0;padding-left:3.2em;text-indent:-3.2em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents ul,.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents ul li{list-style:none}@media(max-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul>li{padding-left:1.6em;text-indent:-1.6em}}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-columns{margin-top:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-columns ul{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-columns li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .refbegin{font-size:90%}}
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
no data
less than 9,250
9,250-16,000
16,000-22,750
22,750-29,500
29,500-36,250
36,250-43,000
43,000-49,750
49,750-56,500
56,500-63,250
63,250-70,000
70,000-80,000
more than 80,000 All Causes world map - DALY - WHO2004.svg
Disability-adjusted life year for all causes per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004.
  no data
  less than 9,250
  9,250–16,000
  16,000–22,750
  22,750–29,500
  29,500–36,250
  36,250–43,000
  43,000–49,750
  49,750–56,500
  56,500–63,250
  63,250–70,000
  70,000–80,000
  more than 80,000

Middle income and especially low-income countries face a plethora of constraints in their healthcare systems. [40] These countries face a severe lack of human and physical resources, as well as some of the largest burdens of disease, extreme poverty, and large population growth rates. Additionally, healthcare access to all reaches of society is generally low in these countries. [41]

According to a World Health Organization (WHO) report from June 2011, higher-income countries show more mHealth activity than do lower-income countries (as consistent with eHealth trends in general). Countries in the European Region are currently the most active and those in the African Region the least active. The WHO report findings also included that mHealth is most easily incorporated into processes and services that historically use voice communication through conventional telephone networks. The report [42] was the result of a mHealth survey module designed by researchers at the Earth Institute's Center for Global Health and Economic Development, [43] Columbia University.

The WHO notes an extreme deficit within the global healthcare workforce. The WHO notes critical healthcare workforce shortages in 57 countries—most of which are characterized as developing countries—and a global deficit of 2.4 million doctors, nurses, and midwives. [44] The WHO, in a study of the healthcare workforce in 12 countries of Africa, finds an average density of physicians, nurses and midwives per 1000 population of 0.64. [45] The density of the same metric is four times as high in the United States, at 2.6. [46]

The burden of disease is additionally much higher in low- and middle-income countries than high-income countries. The burden of disease, measured in disability-adjusted life year (DALY), which can be thought of as a measurement of the gap between current health status and an ideal situation where everyone lives into old age, free of disease and disability, is about five times higher in Africa than in high-income countries. [47] [ page needed ] In addition, low- and middle-income countries are forced to face the burdens of both extreme poverty and the growing incidence of chronic diseases, such as diabetes and heart disease, an effect of new-found (relative) affluence. [3]

Considering poor infrastructure and low human resources, the WHO notes that the healthcare workforce in sub-Saharan Africa would need to be scaled up by as much as 140% to attain international health development targets such as those in the Millennium Declaration. [48]

The WHO, in reference to the healthcare condition in sub-Saharan Africa, states:

The problem is so serious that in many instances there is simply not enough human capacity even to absorb, deploy and efficiently use the substantial additional funds that are considered necessary to improve health in these countries. [48]

Mobile technology has made a recent and rapid appearance into low- and middle-income nations. [49] While, in the mHealth field, mobile technology usually refers to mobile phone technology, the entrance of other technologies into these nations to facilitate healthcare are also discussed here.

Health and development

The link between health and development can be found in three of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), as set forth by the United Nations Millennium Declaration in 2000. The MDGs that specifically address health include reducing child mortality; improving maternal health; combating HIV and AIDS, malaria, and other diseases; and increasing access to safe drinking water. [50] A progress report published in 2006 indicates that childhood immunization and deliveries by skilled birth attendants are on the rise, while many regions continue to struggle to achieve reductions in the prevalence of the diseases of poverty including malaria, HIV and AIDS and tuberculosis. [51]

Healthcare in developed countries

In developed countries, healthcare systems have different policies and goals in relation to the personal and population health care goals.

In the US and EU many patients and consumers use their cell phones and tablets to access health information and look for healthcare services. In parallel the number of mHealth applications grew significantly in the last years.

Clinicians use mobile devices to access patient information and other databases and resources.

Physicians also use mobile devices as an streamlined tool for exchanging patient information, for educational purposes, and as a tool for decision support. [52]

Technology and market

Basic SMS functions and real-time voice communication serve as the backbone and the current most common use of mobile phone technology. The broad range of potential benefits to the health sector that the simple functions of mobile phones can provide should not be understated. [53]

The appeal of mobile communication technologies is that they enable communication in motion, allowing individuals to contact each other irrespective of time and place. [54] [55] This is particularly beneficial for work in remote areas where the mobile phone, and now increasingly wireless infrastructure, is able to reach more people, faster. As a result of such technological advances, the capacity for improved access to information and two-way communication becomes more available at the point of need.

Mobile phones

Mobile phone subscribers per 100 inhabitants 1997-2007 Mobile phone subscribers per 100 inhabitants 1997-2007 ITU.png
Mobile phone subscribers per 100 inhabitants 1997–2007

With the global mobile phone penetration rate drastically increasing over the last decade, mobile phones have made a recent and rapid entrance into many parts of the low- and middle-income world. Improvements in telecommunications technology infrastructure, reduced costs of mobile handsets, and a general increase in non-food expenditure have influenced this trend. Low- and middle-income countries are utilizing mobile phones as "leapfrog technology" (see leapfrogging). That is, mobile phones have allowed many developing countries, even those with relatively poor infrastructure, to bypass 20th century fixed-line technology and jump to modern mobile technology. [56]

The number of global mobile phone subscribers in 2007 was estimated at 3.1 billion of an estimated global population of 6.6 billion (47%). [57] These figures are expected to grow to 4.5 billion by 2012, or a 64.7% mobile penetration rate. The greatest growth is expected in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. In many countries, the number of mobile phone subscribers has bypassed the number of fixed-line telephones; this is particularly true in developing countries. [58] Globally, there were 4.1 billion mobile phones in use in December 2008. See List of countries by number of mobile phones in use.

While mobile phone penetration rates are on the rise, globally, the growth within countries is not generally evenly distributed. In India, for example, while mobile penetration rates have increased markedly, by far the greatest growth rates are found in urban areas. Mobile penetration, in September 2008, was 66% in urban areas, while only 9.4% in rural areas. The all India average was 28.2% at the same time. [59] So, while mobile phones may have the potential to provide greater healthcare access to a larger portion of a population, there are certainly within-country equity issues to consider.

Mobile phones are spreading because the cost of mobile technology deployment is dropping and people are, on average, getting wealthier in low- and middle-income nations. [60] Vendors, such as Nokia, are developing cheaper infrastructure technologies (CDMA) and cheaper phones (sub $50–100, such as Sun's Java phone). Non-food consumption expenditure is increasing in many parts of the developing world, as disposable income rises, causing a rapid increase in spending on new technology, such as mobile phones. In India, for example, consumers have become and continue to become wealthier. Consumers are shifting their expenditure from necessity to discretionary. For example, on average, 56% of Indian consumers' consumption went towards food in 1995, compared to 42% in 2005. The number is expected to drop to 34% by 2015. That being said, although total share of consumption has declined, total consumption of food and beverages increased 82% from 1985 to 2005, while per-capita consumption of food and beverages increased 24%. Indian consumers are getting wealthier and they are spending more and more, with a greater ability to spend on new technologies. [61]

Smartphones

From the first quarter of 2015 through the first quarter of 2021, 107,033 mHealth apps in the health and fitness category were available via the Apple Store and Google Play, an increase of 11.37% from the previous quarter. [6] More advanced mobile phone technologies are enabling the potential for further healthcare delivery. Smartphone technologies are now in the hands of a large number of physicians and other healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries. Although far from ubiquitous, the spread of smartphone technologies opens up doors for mHealth projects such as technology-based diagnosis support, remote diagnostics and telemedicine, preprogrammed daily self-assessment prompts, video or audio clips, [62] web browsing, GPS navigation, access to web-based patient information, post-visit patient surveillance, and decentralized health management information systems (HMIS).

While uptake of smartphone technology by the medical field has grown in low- and middle-income countries, it is worth noting that the capabilities of mobile phones in low- and middle-income countries has not reached the sophistication of those in high-income countries. The infrastructure that enables web browsing, GPS navigation, and email through smartphones is not as well developed in much of the low- and middle-income countries. [53] Increased availability and efficiency in both voice and data-transfer systems in addition to rapid deployment of wireless infrastructure will likely accelerate the deployment of mobile-enabled health systems and services throughout the world. [63]

Other technologies

Beyond mobile phones, wireless-enabled laptops and specialized health-related software applications are currently being developed, tested, and marketed for use in the mHealth field. Many of these technologies, while having some application to low- and middle-income nations, are developing primarily in high-income countries. However, with broad advocacy campaigns for free and open source software (FOSS), applications are beginning to be tailored for and make inroads in low- and middle-income countries. [7]

Some other mHealth technologies include: [1]

Mobile device operating system technology

Technologies relate to the operating systems that orchestrate mobile device hardware while maintaining confidentiality, integrity and availability are required to build trust. This may foster greater adoption of mHealth technologies and services, by exploiting lower cost multi purpose mobile devices such as tablets, PCs, and smartphones. Operating systems that control these emerging classes of devices include Google's Android, Apple's iPhone OS, Microsoft's Windows Mobile, and RIM's BlackBerry OS.

Operating systems must be agile and evolve to effectively balance and deliver the desired level of service to an application and end user, while managing display real estate, power consumption and security posture. With advances in capabilities such as integrating voice, video and Web 2.0 collaboration tools into mobile devices, significant benefits can be achieved in the delivery of health care services. New sensor technologies [64] such as HD video and audio capabilities, accelerometers, GPS, ambient light detectors, barometers and gyroscopes [65] can enhance the methods of describing and studying cases, close to the patient or consumer of the health care service. This could include diagnosis, education, treatment and monitoring.

Air quality sensing technologies

Environmental conditions have a significant impact on public health. Per the World Health Organization, outdoor air pollution accounts for about 1.4% of total mortality. [66] Utilizing Participatory sensing technologies in mobile telephone, public health research can exploit the wide penetration of mobile devices to collect air measurements, [65] which can be utilized to assess the impact of pollution. Projects such as the Urban Atmospheres are utilizing embedded technologies in mobile phones to acquire real time conditions from millions of users mobile phones. By aggregating this data, public health policy shall be able to craft initiatives to mitigate the risk associated with outdoor air pollution.

Data

Data has become an especially important aspect of mHealth. Data collection requires both the collection device (mobile phones, computer, or portable device) and the software that houses the information. Data is primarily focused on visualizing static text but can also extend to interactive decision support algorithms, other visual image information, and also communication capabilities through the integration of e-mail and SMS features. Integrating use of GIS and GPS with mobile technologies adds a geographical mapping component that is able to "tag" voice and data communication to a particular location or series of locations. [67] These combined capabilities have been used for emergency health services as well as for disease surveillance, health facilities and services mapping, and other health-related data collection. [68] [69] [70] [71]

History

The motivation behind the development of the mHealth field arises from two factors. The first factor concerns the myriad constraints felt by healthcare systems of developing nations. These constraints include high population growth, a high burden of disease prevalence, [47] low health care workforce, large numbers of rural inhabitants, and limited financial resources to support healthcare infrastructure and health information systems. The second factor is the recent rapid rise in mobile phone penetration in developing countries to large segments of the healthcare workforce, as well as the population of a country as a whole. [57] With greater access to mobile phones to all segments of a country, including rural areas, the potential of lowering information and transaction costs in order to deliver healthcare improves.

The combination of these two factors has motivated much discussion of how greater access to mobile phone technology can be leveraged to mitigate the numerous pressures faced by developing countries' healthcare systems.

mHealth has a rich research history starting in the early 2000s and has since transformed healthcare delivery and patient engagement. The evolution of mHealth can be traced through significant milestones and initiatives:

Timeline of key events

Early 2000s – Emergence of mHealth research

  • Research initiatives exploring the potential of mobile devices in healthcare settings began to surface. Academic institutions and technology companies started investigating the feasibility of using mobile phones for health-related purposes. [72]

2006 – The Genes, Environment, and Health Initiative (GEI)

  • The GEI program was launched, emphasizing prospective cohort studies. This program laid the groundwork for understanding the interplay between genetics, the environment, and health outcomes. [73] [74] [75]

2007 – Technological advancements

  • A critical year with the introduction of the first iPhone, marking the beginning of the smartphone era that would significantly impact mHealth. [76]

2008 – WHO mHealth Summit

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) organized a summit that recognized the potential of mobile technology in improving global healthcare access, marking a significant milestone in mHealth advocacy. [77]

2009 – Launch of mHealth Alliance

  • The United Nations Foundation established the mHealth Alliance, focusing on leveraging mobile technology to improve health outcomes, especially in developing countries. [78]

2010 – Pioneering mHealth projects

  • Several groundbreaking mHealth projects were initiated worldwide, including programs for remote patient monitoring, disease management, health education via SMS, and mobile apps for healthcare professionals. [79]

mHealth Training Institute (mHTI)

  • The first NIH mHealth Training Institute was held at UCLA to serve as an incubator for developing transdisciplinary scientists capable of co-creating mHealth solutions for complex healthcare problems. The week-long workshop is grounded in a team science model that emphasizes both information transaction and relationship development in the advancement of transdisciplinary mHealth teams capable of impactful healthcare solutions. [80]

2011 – The mHealth Evidence Workshop

  • A collaborative effort involving NSF, NIH, RWJF, and McKesson Foundation, explored mobile health technology evaluation to outline an approach to evidence generation in the field of mHealth that would ensure research is conducted on a rigorous empirical and theoretic foundation. [81]

Open mHealth

  • Open mHealth architecture was introduced, fostering innovation in healthcare through facilitating access and harmonization of digital health data from disparate sources using a global community of developers and health tech decision-makers to make sense of that digital health data through an open interoperability standard. [82] [83]

2012 – mHealth app revolution

  • The proliferation of smartphone apps dedicated to health and fitness catalyzed the mHealth revolution, allowing users to track fitness, monitor vitals, access medical information, and engage in telemedicine. [84]

Smart Health and Wellbeing (SHB)

  • As a follow-up to the mHealth Evidence Workshop, NSF launched the Smart Health and Wellbeing program to address fundamental technical and scientific issues that would support the much-needed transformation of healthcare from reactive and hospital-centered to preventive, proactive, evidence-based, person-centered, and focused on wellbeing rather than disease. [85]

ASSIST Engineering Research Center (ERC)

  • NSF and NIH initiated a joint research program specifically focusing on mHealth, following up on the insights gained from the mHealth Evidence Workshop. The Engineering Research Center ASSIST ERC at NC State University was established to further mHealth research by developing leading-edge systems for high-value applications such as healthcare and IoT by integrating fundamental advances in energy harvesting, low-power electronics, and sensors with a focus on usability and actionable data. [86]

2013 – Wearable technology

  • Around this time, Fitbit (originally Healthy Metrics Research, Inc.) also emerged, pioneering wearable health technology. [87]

2014 – The Big Data To Knowledge (BD2K) Initiative

  • The NIH BD2K Centers of Excellence program provided a significant boost to mHealth research, leading to 12 research centers, like the Mobile Data To Knowledge (MD2K) [88] headquartered at the University of Memphis and Stanford's Center for Mobility Data Integration to Insight (Mobilize), [89] to facilitate studies and innovation in the field. [90]

2015 – Advancements in wearable technology

  • Wearable devices, such as smartwatches and fitness trackers, have become more sophisticated, enabling continuous health monitoring, activity tracking, and integration with mobile health apps. [91] [92]

All of Us

  • mHealth gained prominence in the All of Us program, a precision medicine initiative aiming to collect health data from diverse populations. [93] The launch of smartwatches, particularly the Apple Watch, [94] further emphasized the integration of wearables and health tracking.

'mHealthHUB

  • The mHealthHUB is launched as a virtual forum where technologists, researchers, and clinicians connect, learn, share, and innovate on mHealth tools to transform healthcare. Focused on creating an innovation ecosystem that fosters the collaborative team science essential for mHealth and data science innovations, the site becomes a collaboratory "watering hole" for the mHealth research community. [95]

2017 – NSF Center for Underserved Populations

  • The NSF established the Engineering Research Center for Precise Advanced Technologies and Health Systems for Underserved Populations, emphasizing the integration of engineering research and education with technological innovation to transform national prosperity, health, and security. [96]

Research and development expansion

  • Pharmaceutical companies, tech giants, and healthcare institutions increased their investment in mHealth R&D, exploring AI-driven health apps, remote diagnostics, and personalized medicine. [97] [98]

2020 – Biomedical Technology Resource Centers (BTRCs)

  • Novel mHealth research centers funded by NIH spring from the remnants of the BD2K initiative. mHealth-focused P41 awards for new centers, like the mHealth Center for Discovery, Optimization, and Translation of Temporally-Precise Interventions (mDOT Center) [99] headquartered at the University of Memphis and Stanford's Mobilize Center, [100] were established to focus on innovative biomedical technologies for healthcare. [101]

During the COVID-19 pandemic

  • The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of mHealth solutions for remote consultations, contact tracing apps, telehealth services, and remote patient monitoring to maintain healthcare access during lockdowns. [102] [103] [104]

Present – Ongoing research and integration

  • Current research focuses on AI-driven diagnostics, blockchain for secure health data management, machine learning for predictive analytics, and the integration of mHealth into mainstream healthcare systems. [105] [106]

Research

Emerging trends and areas of interest:

According to the Vodafone Group Foundation on February 13, 2008,[ full citation needed ] a partnership for emergency communications was created between the group and United Nations Foundation. Such partnership will increase the effectiveness of the information and communications technology response to major emergencies and disasters around the world.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telehealth</span> Health care by telecommunication

Telehealth is the distribution of health-related services and information via electronic information and telecommunication technologies. It allows long-distance patient and clinician contact, care, advice, reminders, education, intervention, monitoring, and remote admissions. Telemedicine is sometimes used as a synonym, or is used in a more limited sense to describe remote clinical services, such as diagnosis and monitoring. When rural settings, lack of transport, a lack of mobility, conditions due to outbreaks, epidemics or pandemics, decreased funding, or a lack of staff restrict access to care, telehealth may bridge the gap as well as provide distance-learning; meetings, supervision, and presentations between practitioners; online information and health data management and healthcare system integration. Telehealth could include two clinicians discussing a case over video conference; a robotic surgery occurring through remote access; physical therapy done via digital monitoring instruments, live feed and application combinations; tests being forwarded between facilities for interpretation by a higher specialist; home monitoring through continuous sending of patient health data; client to practitioner online conference; or even videophone interpretation during a consult.

eHealth describes healthcare services which are supported by digital processes, communication or technology such as electronic prescribing, Telehealth, or Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The term "eHealth" originated in the 1990s, initially conceived as "Internet medicine," but has since evolved to have a broader range of technologies and innovations aimed at enhancing healthcare delivery and accessibility. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), eHealth encompasses not only internet-based healthcare services but also modern advancements such as artificial intelligence, mHealth, and telehealth, which collectively aim to improve accessibility and efficiency in healthcare delivery. Usage of the term varies widely. A study in 2005 found 51 unique definitions of eHealth, reflecting its diverse applications and interpretations. While some argue that it is interchangeable with health informatics as a broad term covering electronic/digital processes in health, others use it in the narrower sense of healthcare practice specifically facilitated by the Internet. It also includes health applications and links on mobile phones, referred to as mHealth or m-Health.. Key components of eHealth include electronic health records (EHRs), telemedicine, health information exchange, mobile health applications, wearable devices, and online health information. For example, diabetes monitoring apps allow patients to track health metrics in real time, bridging the gap between home and clinical care. These technologies enable healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders to access, manage, and exchange health information more effectively, leading to improved communication, decision-making, and overall healthcare outcomes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telenursing</span> Nursing care through telecoms

Telenursing refers to the use of information technology in the provision of nursing services whenever physical distance exists between patient and nurse, or between any number of nurses. As a field, it is part of telemedicine, and has many points of contacts with other medical and non-medical applications, such as telediagnosis, teleconsultation, and telemonitoring. The field, however, is still being developed as the information on telenursing isn't comprehensive enough.

A personal health record (PHR) is a health record where health data and other information related to the care of a patient is maintained by the patient. This stands in contrast to the more widely used electronic medical record, which is operated by institutions and contains data entered by clinicians to support insurance claims. The intention of a PHR is to provide a complete and accurate summary of an individual's medical history which is accessible online. The health data on a PHR might include patient-reported outcome data, lab results, and data from devices such as wireless electronic weighing scales or from a smartphone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telerehabilitation</span> Delivery of rehabilitation services over the internet

Telerehabilitation (or e-rehabilitation is the delivery of rehabilitation services over telecommunication networks and the internet. Telerehabilitation allows patients to interact with providers remotely and can be used both to assess patients and to deliver therapy. Fields of medicine that utilize telerehabilitation include: physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, audiology, and psychology. Therapy sessions can be individual or community-based. Types of therapy available include motor training exercises, speech therapy, virtual reality, robotic therapy, goal setting, and group exercise.

An e-patient is a health consumer who participates fully in their own medical care, primarily by gathering information about medical conditions that impact them and their families, using the Internet and other digital tools. The term encompasses those who seek guidance for their own ailments, and the friends and family members who research on their behalf. E-patients report two effects of their health research: "better health information and services, and different, but not always better, relationships with their doctors."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health 2.0</span>

"Health 2.0" is a term introduced in the mid-2000s, as the subset of health care technologies mirroring the wider Web 2.0 movement. It has been defined variously as including social media, user-generated content, and cloud-based and mobile technologies. Some Health 2.0 proponents see these technologies as empowering patients to have greater control over their own health care and diminishing medical paternalism. Critics of the technologies have expressed concerns about possible misinformation and violations of patient privacy.

Patient participation is a trend that arose in answer to medical paternalism. Informed consent is a process where patients make decisions informed by the advice of medical professionals.

The use of electronic and communication technologies as a therapeutic aid to healthcare practices is commonly referred to as telemedicine or eHealth. The use of such technologies as a supplement to mainstream therapies for mental disorders is an emerging mental health treatment field which, it is argued, could improve the accessibility, effectiveness and affordability of mental health care. Mental health technologies used by professionals as an adjunct to mainstream clinical practices include email, SMS, virtual reality, computer programs, blogs, social networks, the telephone, video conferencing, computer games, instant messaging and podcasts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Remote patient monitoring</span> Technology to monitor patients outside of conventional clinical settings

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is a technology to enable monitoring of patients outside of conventional clinical settings, such as in the home or in a remote area, which may increase access to care and decrease healthcare delivery costs. RPM involves the constant remote care of patients by their physicians, often to track physical symptoms, chronic conditions, or post-hospitalization rehab.

Digital health is a discipline that includes digital care programs, technologies with health, healthcare, living, and society to enhance the efficiency of healthcare delivery and to make medicine more personalized and precise. It uses information and communication technologies to facilitate understanding of health problems and challenges faced by people receiving medical treatment and social prescribing in more personalised and precise ways. The definitions of digital health and its remits overlap in many ways with those of health and medical informatics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health information on the Internet</span>

Health information on the Internet refers to all health-related information communicated through or available on the Internet.

Model for assessment of telemedicine (MAST) is a framework for assessment of the value of telemedicine.

Digital therapeutics, a subset of digital health, are evidence-based therapeutic interventions driven by high quality software programs to prevent, manage, or treat a medical disorder or disease. Digital therapeutic companies should publish trial results inclusive of clinically meaningful outcomes in peer-reviewed journals. The treatment relies on behavioral and lifestyle changes usually spurred by a collection of digital impetuses. Because of the digital nature of the methodology, data can be collected and analyzed as both a progress report and a preventative measure. Treatments are being developed for the prevention and management of a wide variety of diseases and conditions, including type 1 & type II diabetes, congestive heart failure, obesity, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, asthma, substance abuse, ADHD, hypertension, anxiety, depression, and several others. Digital therapeutics often employ strategies rooted in cognitive behavioral therapy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artificial intelligence in healthcare</span> Overview of the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare

Artificial intelligence in healthcare is the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze and understand complex medical and healthcare data. In some cases, it can exceed or augment human capabilities by providing better or faster ways to diagnose, treat, or prevent disease.

Health data is any data "related to health conditions, reproductive outcomes, causes of death, and quality of life" for an individual or population. Health data includes clinical metrics along with environmental, socioeconomic, and behavioral information pertinent to health and wellness. A plurality of health data are collected and used when individuals interact with health care systems. This data, collected by health care providers, typically includes a record of services received, conditions of those services, and clinical outcomes or information concerning those services. Historically, most health data has been sourced from this framework. The advent of eHealth and advances in health information technology, however, have expanded the collection and use of health data—but have also engendered new security, privacy, and ethical concerns. The increasing collection and use of health data by patients is a major component of digital health.

Natasha Gajewski (née Rana) is the CEO and Founder of Symple Health.

Mental health informatics is a branch of health or clinical informatics focused on the use of information technology (IT) and information to improve mental health. Like health informatics, mental health informatics is a multidisciplinary field that promotes care delivery, research and education as well as the technology and methodologies required to implement it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet-based treatments for trauma survivors</span>

Internet-based treatments for trauma survivors is a growing class of online treatments that allow for an individual who has experienced trauma to seek and receive treatment without needing to attend psychotherapy in person. The progressive movement to online resources and the need for more accessible mental health services has given rise to the creation of online-based interventions aimed to help those who have experienced traumatic events. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has shown to be particularly effective in the treatment of trauma-related disorders and adapting CBT to an online format has been shown to be as effective as in-person CBT in the treatment of trauma. Due to its positive outcomes, CBT-based internet treatment options for trauma survivors has been an expanding field in both research and clinical settings.

Digital health interventions, or digital healthcare interventions, commonly referenced as DHIs in scientific articles, have emerged as a alternative in healthcare that may enable improved health outcomes, increase healthcare delivery, and empower patients. Commonly, it offers options to provide treatments, monitor health conditions, assist patients, and enable healthcare professionals to extend their services. Health mobile applications have become more popular - as mentioned by Butcher and Hussain, in 2022, more than 100,000 healthcare mobile applications were offered in Apple and Google app stores. These interventions may utilise various digital technologies and applications, besides mobile apps and websites, and they may comprehend wearables, biosensors, and Internet of Things

References

  1. 1 2 Adibi, Sasan, ed. (February 19, 2015). Mobile Health: A Technology Road Map. Springer Series in Bio-/Neuroinformatics. Vol. 5. Springer. p. 1. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12817-7. ISBN   978-3-319-12817-7.
  2. 1 2 Cipresso, P.; Serino S.; Villani D.; Repetto C.; Selitti L.; Albani G.; Mauro A.; Gaggioli A.; Riva G. (2012). "Is your phone so smart to affect your states? An exploratory study based on psychophysiological measures". Neurocomputing. 84: 23–30. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2011.12.027.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Vital Wave Consulting (February 2009). mHealth for Development: The Opportunity of Mobile Technology for Healthcare in the Developing World (PDF). United Nations Foundation, Vodafone Foundation. p. 9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-12-03.
  4. 1 2 Pimmer, Christoph; Tulenko, Kate (2016). "The convergence of mobile and social media: Affordances and constraints of mobile networked communication for health workers in low- and middle-income countries". Mobile Media & Communication. 4 (2): 252–269. doi:10.1177/2050157915622657. S2CID   167748382.
  5. Germanakos P, Mourlas C, Samaras G. "A Mobile Agent Approach for Ubiquitous and Personalized eHealth Information Systems" (PDF). Proceedings of the Workshop on 'Personalization for e-Health' of the 10th International Conference on User Modeling (UM'05). Edinburgh, July 29, 2005. pp. 67–70.
  6. 1 2 Alhur, Mohammad Salem; Alshamari, Shaher; Oláh, Judit; Aldreabi, Hanadi (2022-01-01). "Unsupervised Machine Learning to Identify Positive and Negative Themes in Jordanian mHealth Apps". International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications. 14 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.4018/IJESMA.313950 . ISSN   1941-627X.
  7. 1 2 3 Adibi, Sasan, ed. (November 24, 2014). mHealth Multidisciplinary Verticals. CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group). p. 259. ISBN   978-1-482-21480-2.
  8. 1 2 Masson, M (December 2014). "Benefits of TED Talks". Canadian Family Physician. 60 (12): 1080. PMC   4264800 . PMID   25500595.
  9. Istepanian, Robert S.H.; Laxminarayan, Swamy; Pattichis, Constantinos S., eds. (2006). M-Health: Emerging Mobile Health Systems. Topics in Biomedical Engineering. Boston, MA: Springer. Bibcode:2006mhem.book.....I. doi:10.1007/b137697. ISBN   978-0-387-26558-2. OCLC   836533004.
  10. 1 2 Torgan, Carol (November 6, 2009). "The mHealth Summit: Local & Global Converge". caroltorgan.com. Retrieved July 29, 2011.
  11. "mHealth: a new vision for healthcare" (PDF).
  12. "What is digital health technology and what can it do for me?". NIHR Evidence. 2022. doi:10.3310/nihrevidence_53447. S2CID   252584020.
  13. Rowland SP, Fitzgerald JE, Holme T, Powell J, McGregor A (2020). "What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients?". npj Digital Medicine. 3: 4. doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0206-x. PMC   6957674 . PMID   31970289.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Odendaal, Willem A.; Anstey Watkins, Jocelyn; Leon, Natalie; Goudge, Jane; Griffiths, Frances; Tomlinson, Mark; Daniels, Karen (March 2020). "Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3 (3): CD011942. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011942.pub2. ISSN   1469-493X. PMC   7098082 . PMID   32216074.
  15. Moungui, Henri Claude; Nana-Djeunga, Hugues Clotaire; Anyiang, Che Frankline; Cano, Mireia; Postigo, Jose Antonio Ruiz; Carrion, Carme (2024-01-05). "Dissemination Strategies for mHealth Apps: Systematic Review". JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 12 (1): e50293. doi: 10.2196/50293 . PMC   10799285 . PMID   38180796.
  16. Pimmer, C, Brühlmann, F, Odetola TD, Dipeolu O, Oluwasola, DO, Ajuwon, AJ (2008). "Facilitating Professional Mobile Learning Communities with Instant Messaging". Computers & Education. 128: 102–11. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.005. S2CID   53744443.
  17. 1 2 Devi, Balla Rama; Syed-Abdul, Shabbir; Kumar, Arun; Iqbal, Usman; Nguyen, Phung-Anh; Li, Yu-Chuan Jack; Jian, Wen-Shan (2015-11-01). "mHealth: An updated systematic review with a focus on HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis long term management using mobile phones". Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 122 (2): 257–265. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.08.003. ISSN   1872-7565. PMID   26304621.
  18. Murray, Melanie Caroline Margaret; Lester, Richard T.; Money, Deborah M.; Kestler, Mary H.; Alimenti, Ariane; Pick, Neora; Albert, Arianne YK; Maan, Evelyn J.; Qiu, Annie Q. (2017). "Mobile Text Messaging to Improve Medication Adherence and Viral Load in a Vulnerable Canadian Population Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Repeated Measures Study". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 19 (6): e190. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6631 . PMC   5472843 . PMID   28572079.
  19. Maddison, Ralph; Rolleston, Anna; Stewart, Ralph; Jiang, Yannan; Whittaker, Robyn; Dale, Leila Pfaeffli (2015). "Text Message and Internet Support for Coronary Heart Disease Self-Management: Results From the Text4Heart Randomized Controlled Trial". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 17 (10): e237. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4944 . PMC   4642389 . PMID   26490012.
  20. 1 2 Hamine, Saee; Gerth-Guyette, Emily; Faulx, Dunia; Green, Beverly B.; Ginsburg, Amy Sarah (2015-02-24). "Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 17 (2): e52. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3951 . ISSN   1438-8871. PMC   4376208 . PMID   25803266.
  21. Belt, Tom H. van de; Gelder, Marleen MHJ van; Massari, Daniele De; Zimmerman, Lisa; Hendriks, Sandra; Engelen, Lucien JLPG; Heeren, Barend; Lancee, Gerardus J.; Tack, Cornelis J. (2018). "Glucose Control, Disease Burden, and Educational Gaps in People With Type 1 Diabetes: Exploratory Study of an Integrated Mobile Diabetes App". JMIR Diabetes. 3 (4): e17. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.9531 . PMC   6286423 . PMID   30470680.
  22. Chomutare, Taridzo; Fernandez-Luque, Luis; Årsand, Eirik; Hartvigsen, Gunnar (2011-01-01). "Features of Mobile Diabetes Applications: Review of the Literature and Analysis of Current Applications Compared Against Evidence-Based Guidelines". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 13 (3): e65. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1874 . PMC   3222161 . PMID   21979293.
  23. Nair, Uthara; Armfield, Nigel R.; Chatfield, Mark D.; Edirippulige, Sisira (December 2018). "The effectiveness of telemedicine interventions to address maternal depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 24 (10): 639–650. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18794332 . ISSN   1758-1109. PMID   30343660.
  24. 1 2 Farb, Norman AS; Saab, Bechara J.; Walsh, Kathleen Marie (2019). "Effects of a Mindfulness Meditation App on Subjective Well-Being: Active Randomized Controlled Trial and Experience Sampling Study". JMIR Mental Health. 6 (1): e10844. doi: 10.2196/10844 . PMC   6329416 . PMID   30622094.
  25. Furberg RD, Uhrig JD, Bann CM, Lewis MA, Harris JL, Williams P, Coomes C, Martin N, Kuhns L (2012). "Technical Implementation of a Multi-Component, Text Message–Based Intervention for Persons Living with HIV". JMIR Res Protoc. 1 (2): e17. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2017 . PMC   3626151 . PMID   23612237.
  26. "Apps to help patients take medication on time need to be evaluated in a consistent way". NIHR Evidence (Plain English summary). National Institute for Health and Care Research. 2020-06-02. doi:10.3310/alert_40365. S2CID   240805696.
  27. Armitage, Laura Catherine; Kassavou, Aikaterini; Sutton, Stephen (30 January 2020). "Do mobile device apps designed to support medication adherence demonstrate efficacy? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials, with meta-analysis". BMJ Open. 10 (1): e032045. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032045. ISSN   2044-6055. PMC   7045248 . PMID   32005778.
  28. "mHealth. New horizons for health through mobile technologies" (PDF). World Health Organization. Retrieved May 22, 2014.
  29. Baum, Peter (September 18–21, 2012). A new track for technology: Can ICT take care for healthier lifestyles?. 22nd European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society. hdl:10419/52185.
  30. Mahmud, N; Rodriguez, Nesbit (2010). "A text message-based intervention to bridge the healthcare communication gap in the rural developing world". Technol Health Care. 18 (2): 137–144. doi:10.3233/THC-2010-0576. PMID   20495253.
  31. Bloomfield, Gerald S; Vedanthan, Rajesh; Vasudevan, Lavanya; Kithei, Anne; Were, Martin; Velazquez, Eric J (2014). "Mobile health for non-communicable diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the literature and strategic framework for research". Globalization and Health. 10 (1): 49. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-49 . ISSN   1744-8603. PMC   4064106 . PMID   24927745.
  32. Republic of Uganda. (2012). Coordination and harmonisation of eHealth initiatives [circular ADM 45/273/01].  Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health.
  33. Helsper, Ellen J; Reisdorf, Bianca C (2017). "The emergence of a "digital underclass" in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion". New Media & Society. 19 (8): 1253–1270. doi:10.1177/1461444816634676. ISSN   1461-4448. S2CID   30116698.
  34. Hampshire, Kate; Porter, Gina; Owusu, Samuel Asiedu; Mariwah, Simon; Abane, Albert; Robson, Elsbeth; Munthali, Alister; DeLannoy, Ariane; Bango, Andisiwe (2015). "Informal m-health: How are young people using mobile phones to bridge healthcare gaps in Sub-Saharan Africa?". Social Science & Medicine. 142: 90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.033 . PMID   26298645.
  35. Haenssgen, Marco J. (2018). "The struggle for digital inclusion: Phones, healthcare, and marginalisation in rural India" (PDF). World Development. 104: 358–374. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.023. S2CID   158390248.
  36. Lupton, Deborah (2013). "Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies". Critical Public Health. 23 (4): 393–403. doi:10.1080/09581596.2013.794931. ISSN   0958-1596. S2CID   53492891.
  37. 1 2 Lupton, Deborah (2014). "Critical Perspectives on Digital Health Technologies: Digital Health Technologies". Sociology Compass. 8 (12): 1344–1359. doi:10.1111/soc4.12226.
  38. Haas, Sebastian; Wohlgemuth, Sven; Echizen, Isao; Sonehara, Noboru; Müller, Günter (2011). "Aspects of privacy for electronic health records". International Journal of Medical Informatics. 80 (2): e26–e31. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.001. PMID   21041113.
  39. "WHO Disease and injury country estimates". World Health Organization. 2009. Retrieved Nov 11, 2009.
  40. Larsson, Emma; Mawkin, Mala; Taylor-Robinson, Simon D; Harrington, Peter; Gondwe, Hastings; Watson, Chris; Gallagher, Joseph; Ledwidge, Mark; Chirambo, Griphin Baxter; O'Donoghue, John (December 2020). "Implementing Innovative Approaches to Healthcare in a Lower-Middle Income Country: Perspectives from Malawi". International Journal of General Medicine. 13: 1723–1730. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S285130 . ISSN   1178-7074. PMC   7783193 . PMID   33414644.
  41. Peters, David H.; Garg, Anu; Bloom, Gerry; Walker, Damian G.; Brieger, William R.; Hafizur Rahman, M. (2008). "Poverty and Access to Health Care in Developing Countries". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1136 (1): 161–171. Bibcode:2008NYASA1136..161P. doi: 10.1196/annals.1425.011 . PMID   17954679. S2CID   24649523.
  42. mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies. Global Observatory for eHealth series. Vol. 3. World Health Organization. 7 June 2011. ISBN   978-92-4-156425-0. Archived from the original on January 29, 2013.
  43. "Center for Global Health and Economic Development". Archived from the original on 27 February 2009.
  44. World Health Organization (2006). The World Health Report 2006: Working Together for Health (Report). Geneva: WHO. Archived from the original on April 10, 2006.
  45. Kinfu, Y.; Dal Poz, M.; Mercer, H.; Evans, D.B. (March 2009). "Table 3. Current density of physicians, nurses and midwives and required rate of workforce growth according to population growth rates in 12 African countries". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 87 (3): 225–230. doi:10.2471/blt.08.051599 (inactive 5 December 2024). PMC   2654639 . PMID   19377719. Archived from the original on October 12, 2009.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
  46. UNData. "Statistics Physicians density (per 10 000 population)". WHO Data. Archived from the original on 15 February 2009.
  47. 1 2 The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update (Report). World Health Organization. 2008. Archived from the original on March 24, 2009.
  48. 1 2 Kinfu, Y.; Dal Poz, M.; Mercer, H.; Evans, D.B. (March 2009). "The health worker shortage in Africa: are enough physicians and nurses being trained?". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 87 (3): 225–230. doi:10.2471/blt.08.051599 (inactive 5 December 2024). PMC   2654639 . PMID   19377719. Archived from the original on March 16, 2009.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
  49. "The power of mobile money". The Economist. September 24, 2009.
  50. United Nations General Assembly Session 55 Resolution55/2. United Nations Millennium DeclarationA/res/55/2 18 September 2000.
  51. United Nations (2006). The Millennium Development Goals Report (PDF) (Report). New York: United Nations. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-06-14. Retrieved 2017-10-26.
  52. Kraushaar, Judith; Bohnet-Joschko, Sabine (2023-04-01). "Prevalence and patterns of mobile device usage among physicians in clinical practice: A systematic review". Health Informatics Journal. 29 (2): 14604582231169296. doi:10.1177/14604582231169296. ISSN   1460-4582.
  53. 1 2 Mechael, Patricia N. (December 2006). Exploring Health-related Uses of Mobile Phones: An Egyptian Case Study (PDF) (PhD). London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. p. 264 via iHRIS Wiki.
  54. Agar, J. (2003). Constant Touch: A Global History of the Mobile Phone Cambridge: Icon Books Ltd.
  55. Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone's impact on society London: Morgan Kaufmann
  56. "Leaders: The limits of leapfrogging; Technology and development". The Economist. February 7, 2008.
  57. 1 2 "Global Mobile Phone Subscribers to Reach 4.5 Billion by 2012". Cellular News. March 9, 2008. Retrieved 2010-04-01.
  58. ITU (2003). "Mobile overtakes fixed: Implications for policy and regulation" (PDF). Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
  59. Kathuria, R, Uppal M., Mamta (2009). An econometric analysis of the impact of mobile. Case paper in India: The impact of mobile phones. Vodafone Group Plc. The Policy Paper Series. November 2009
  60. "Global Economic Prospects 2007: Managing the Next Wave of Globalization". World Bank report. Archived from the original on 2006-12-21.
  61. Jonathan Ablett; Aadarsh Baijal; Eric Beinhocker; Anupam Bose; Diana Farrell; Ulrich Gersch; Ezra Greenberg; Shishir Gupta; Sumit Gupta (May 2007), The 'bird of gold': the rise of India's consumer market, McKinsey Global Institute
  62. Ben-Zeev, Dror; Brian, Rachel M.; Jonathan, Geneva; Razzano, Lisa; Pashka, Nicole; Carpenter-Song, Elizabeth; Drake, Robert E.; Scherer, Emily A. (2018). "Mobile Health (mHealth) Versus Clinic-Based Group Intervention for People With Serious Mental Illness: A Randomized Controlled Trial". Psychiatric Services. 69 (9): 978–985. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800063 . ISSN   1075-2730. PMID   29793397.
  63. Istepanian, R.S.H.; Jovanov, E.; Zhang, Y.T. (December 2004). "Introduction to the Special Section on M-Health: Beyond Seamless Mobility and Global Wireless Health-care Connectivity" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. 8 (4): 405–414. doi:10.1109/titb.2004.840019. PMID   15615031. S2CID   71150.
  64. New sensor technologies. 2008. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.141.6348 .
  65. 1 2 Lane, Nicholas; Miluzzo, Emiliano; Lu, Hong; Peebles, Daniel; Choudhury, Tanzeem; Campbell, Andrew (2010). "A survey of mobile phone sensing". IEEE Communications Magazine. 48 (9): 140–150. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.186.9844 . doi:10.1109/MCOM.2010.5560598. S2CID   356450.
  66. Ostro, Bart (2004). Outdoor air pollution: assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels (null ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization, Protection of the Human Environment. ISBN   978-92-4-159146-1.
  67. Larocca, Alberto; Moro Visconti, Roberto; Marconi, Michele (2016-10-24). "Malaria diagnosis and mapping with m-Health and geographic information systems (GIS): evidence from Uganda". Malaria Journal. 15 (1): 520. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1546-5 . ISSN   1475-2875. PMC   5075756 . PMID   27776516.
  68. Nhavoto, José António; Grönlund, Åke (2014-05-08). "Mobile Technologies and Geographic Information Systems to Improve Health Care Systems: A Literature Review". JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2 (2): e3216. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3216 . PMC   4114429 . PMID   25099368.
  69. Wirth, Felix Nikolaus; Johns, Marco; Meurers, Thierry; Prasser, Fabian (2020-11-10). "Citizen-Centered Mobile Health Apps Collecting Individual-Level Spatial Data for Infectious Disease Management: Scoping Review". JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 8 (11): e22594. doi: 10.2196/22594 . PMC   7674146 . PMID   33074833.
  70. Boonchieng, Ekkarat; Boonchieng, Waraporn; Senaratana, Wilawan; Singkaew, Jaras (2014). "Development of mHealth for public health information collection, with GIS, using private cloud: A case study of Saraphi district, Chiang Mai, Thailand". 2014 International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC). pp. 350–353. doi:10.1109/ICSEC.2014.6978221. ISBN   978-1-4799-4963-2. S2CID   1637426.
  71. Huang, Lanlan; Xu, Yubin; Chen, Xiuwan; Li, Huaiyu; Wu, Yuhang (2012). "Design and Implementation of Location Based Mobile Health System". 2012 Fourth International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences. pp. 919–922. doi:10.1109/ICCIS.2012.118. ISBN   978-1-4673-2406-9. S2CID   17391991.
  72. Istepanian, R.S.H.; Lacal, J.C. (2003). "Emerging mobile communication technologies for health: Some imperative notes on m-health". Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439). pp. 1414–1416. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2003.1279581. ISBN   0-7803-7789-3. S2CID   15038909 . Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  73. Manolio, Teri A.; Bailey-Wilson, Joan E.; Collins, Francis S. (October 2006). "Genes, environment and the value of prospective cohort studies". Nature Reviews. Genetics. 7 (10): 812–820. doi:10.1038/nrg1919. ISSN   1471-0056. PMID   16983377. S2CID   20773705.
  74. "The Genes, Environment and Health Initiative (GEI)". Genome.gov. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  75. "Genes, Environment and Health Initiative Invests In Genetic Studies, Environmental Monitoring Technologies". National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2015-10-14. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  76. "Apple Reinvents the Phone with iPhone". Apple Newsroom. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  77. "Sixty-first World Health Assembly, Geneva, 19–24 May 2008". www.who.int. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  78. "2009". unfoundation.org. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  79. Smith, Catherine Arnott; Hetzel, Scott; Dalrymple, Prudence; Keselman, Alla (2011-12-02). "Beyond Readability: Investigating Coherence of Clinical Text for Consumers". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 13 (4): e104. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1842 . ISSN   1438-8871. PMC   3278090 . PMID   22138127.
  80. "mHealth Training Institute – About". mhti.md2k.org. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  81. Kumar, Santosh; Nilsen, Wendy J.; Abernethy, Amy; Atienza, Audie; Patrick, Kevin; Pavel, Misha; Riley, William T.; Shar, Albert; Spring, Bonnie; Spruijt-Metz, Donna; Hedeker, Donald; Honavar, Vasant; Kravitz, Richard; Lefebvre, R. Craig; Mohr, David C. (August 2013). "Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop". American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 45 (2): 228–236. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017. ISSN   1873-2607. PMC   3803146 . PMID   23867031.
  82. Estrin, Deborah; Sim, Ida (2010-11-05). "Health care delivery. Open mHealth architecture: an engine for health care innovation". Science. 330 (6005): 759–760. doi:10.1126/science.1196187. ISSN   1095-9203. PMID   21051617. S2CID   206529278.
  83. "About Us". Open mHealth. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  84. Steinhubl, Steven R.; Muse, Evan D.; Topol, Eric J. (2013). "Can Mobile Health Technologies Transform Health Care?". JAMA. 310 (22): 2395–2396. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281078. PMID   24158428 . Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  85. "Smart Health and Wellbeing (SHB)(nsf12512)". www.nsf.gov. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  86. "About ASSIST". Center for Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies (ASSIST). Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  87. Bell, Karissa (2014-06-26). "Fitbit Updates App With Exercise and Run-Tracking Features". Mashable. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  88. "About Us – MD2K" . Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  89. "ABOUT – Mobilize Center" . Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  90. "Big Data to Knowledge Resources | NIH Common Fund". commonfund.nih.gov. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  91. Kang, Harjeevan Singh; Exworthy, Mark (2022-07-13). "Wearing the Future—Wearables to Empower Users to Take Greater Responsibility for Their Health and Care: Scoping Review". JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 10 (7): e35684. doi: 10.2196/35684 . ISSN   2291-5222. PMC   9330198 . PMID   35830222.
  92. Wu, Min; PhD; Luo, Jake (2019-11-25). "Wearable Technology Applications in Healthcare: A Literature Review | HIMSS". www.himss.org. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  93. Collins, Francis S.; Varmus, Harold (2015-02-26). "A new initiative on precision medicine". The New England Journal of Medicine. 372 (9): 793–795. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1500523. ISSN   1533-4406. PMC   5101938 . PMID   25635347.
  94. "Apple Watch", Wikipedia, 2023-12-02, retrieved 2023-12-05
  95. "About - mHealthHUB.org". mHealthHUB.org. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
  96. "Overview". pathsup.org. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  97. Dang, Amit; Arora, Dimple; Rane, Pawan (2020-05-31). "Role of digital therapeutics and the changing future of healthcare". Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 9 (5): 2207–2213. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_105_20 . ISSN   2249-4863. PMC   7380804 . PMID   32754475.
  98. Bohr, Adam; Memarzadeh, Kaveh (2020). "The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications". Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: 25–60. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-818438-7.00002-2. ISBN   9780128184387. PMC   7325854 .
  99. "RePORT ⟩ RePORTER". reporter.nih.gov. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  100. "RePORT ⟩ RePORTER". reporter.nih.gov. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  101. "NIBIB-supported Centers for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering". www.nibib.nih.gov. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  102. Taha, Abdul Rahman; Shehadeh, Mustafa; Alshehhi, Ali; Altamimi, Tariq; Housser, Emma; Simsekler, Mecit Can Emre; Alfalasi, Buthaina; Al Memari, Shammah; Al Hosani, Farida; Al Zaabi, Yousif; Almazroui, Shereena; Alhashemi, Hamed; Alhajri, Noora (2022-02-24). "The integration of mHealth technologies in telemedicine during the COVID-19 era: A cross-sectional study". PLOS ONE. 17 (2): e0264436. Bibcode:2022PLoSO..1764436T. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264436 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   8870491 . PMID   35202424.
  103. Ling, Hua; Egolum, Ugochukwu (2021-05-11). "Evaluation of Daily Activity Duration in Patients with Heart Failure During the Covid-19 Pandemic". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 77 (18): 809. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(21)02168-9. ISSN   0735-1097. PMC   8091250 .
  104. Memphis, MD2K Center of Excellence at The University of. "mContain". mcontain.md2k.org. Retrieved 2023-12-05.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  105. Yeung, Andy Wai Kan; Torkamani, Ali; Butte, Atul J.; Glicksberg, Benjamin S.; Schuller, Björn; Rodriguez, Blanca; Ting, Daniel S. W.; Bates, David; Schaden, Eva; Peng, Hanchuan; Willschke, Harald; van der Laak, Jeroen; Car, Josip; Rahimi, Kazem; Celi, Leo Anthony (2023-09-26). "The promise of digital healthcare technologies". Frontiers in Public Health. 11: 1196596. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1196596 . ISSN   2296-2565. PMC   10562722 . PMID   37822534.
  106. Kumar, Ritik; Arjunaditya; Singh, Divyangi; Srinivasan, Kathiravan; Hu, Yuh-Chung (2022-12-27). "AI-Powered Blockchain Technology for Public Health: A Contemporary Review, Open Challenges, and Future Research Directions". Healthcare. 11 (1): 81. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010081 . ISSN   2227-9032. PMC   9819078 . PMID   36611541.
  107. 1 2 Mechael, P. (August 2007). WHO mHealth Review: Towards the Development of an mHealth Strategy (Report).
  108. Bennett, Simeon (14 May 2010). "Ghana News: West African Innovation Hits Global Stage". Joy Online. Modified for length by Richard Akuoko. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2010-05-16. Retrieved 2010-08-14.
  109. Dobkin, Bruce H.; Dorsch, Andrew (2011). "The Promise of mHealth: Daily Activity Monitoring and Outcome Assessments by Wearable Sensors". Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 25 (9): 788–798. doi:10.1177/1545968311425908. ISSN   1545-9683. PMC   4098920 . PMID   21989632.
  110. Fradkin, Nick; Zbikowski, Susan M; Christensen, Trevor (2022-03-09). "Analysis of Demographic Characteristics of Users of a Free Tobacco Cessation Smartphone App: Observational Study". JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 8 (3): e32499. doi: 10.2196/32499 . ISSN   2369-2960. PMC   8943539 . PMID   35262491.
  111. Adkins, Elizabeth C.; O'Loughlin, Kristen; Neary, Martha; Schueller, Stephen M. (2018). "Discovery of and Interest in Health Apps Among Those With Mental Health Needs: Survey and Focus Group Study". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 20 (6): e10141. doi: 10.2196/10141 . PMC   6018235 . PMID   29891468.
  112. Deady, Mark; GLozier, N.; Calvo, R.A.; Johnston, D M. (2020). "Preventing depression using a smartphone app: a randomized controlled trial". Psychological Medicine. 2020 (3): 457–466. doi:10.1017/S0033291720002081. hdl: 10044/1/80590 . PMID   32624013. S2CID   220372098.
  113. Martin, Nick (22 July 2013). "Charting the Future of Capacity Building for mHealth". TechChange . Retrieved August 4, 2013.
  114. Elliott, Jane (16 January 2010). "Text reminder to take epilepsy tablets". BBC News.
  115. Chomutare T, Fernandez-Luque L, Arsand E, Hartvigsen G (22 September 2011). "Features of mobile diabetes applications". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 13 (3): e65. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1874 . PMC   3222161 . PMID   21979293.
  116. Bailey, Eric (August 15, 2013). "Deborah Jeffries, MD, talks about collaborative video and emerging telemedicine trends". mHealthNews. HIMSS Media. Archived from the original on 2013-08-25.
  117. Bentvelsen, R.G.; Laan, B.J.; Bonten, T.; van der Vaart, R.; Hetem, D.J.; Soetekouw, R.; Geerlings, S.E.; Chavannes, N.H.; Veldkamp, K.E. (May 2024). "Patient engagement to counter catheter-associated urinary tract infections with an app (PECCA): a multicentre, prospective, interrupted time-series and before-and-after study". Journal of Hospital Infection. 147: 98–106. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2023.11.005. hdl: 1887/3754891 . PMID   38040039.
  118. Abbott, Patricia; Barbosa, Sayonara (2015). "Using Information Technology and Social Mobilization to Combat Disease" (PDF). Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 28 (1). ISSN   0103-2100 . Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  119. Koutras C, Bitsaki M, Koutras G, Nikolaou C, Heep H (17 August 2015). "Socioeconomic impact of e-Health services in major joint replacement: A scoping review". Technol Health Care. 23 (6): 809–17. doi:10.3233/THC-151036. PMID   26409523.
  120. Abdul SS, Lin CW, Scholl J, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian WS, Hsu MH, Li YC (2011). "Facebook use leads to health-care reform in Taiwan". The Lancet. 377 (9783): 2083–2084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60919-7 . PMID   21684378. S2CID   32789692.

Further reading