Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.

Last updated

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.
Delaware District Court.png
Court United States District Court for the District of Delaware
Full case name In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation
Docket nos. 1:05-cv-00441
1:05-md-01717
Citation496 F. Supp. 2d 404 (D. Del. 2007)
Case history
Prior actionsConsolidated, In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litig., 403 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2005)
Court membership
Judge sitting Joseph James Farnan Jr.

AMD v. Intel was a private antitrust lawsuit, filed in the United States by Advanced Micro Devices ("AMD") against Intel Corporation in June 2005.

Contents

History

AMD launched the lawsuit against its rival Intel, the world's leading microprocessor manufacturer. AMD has claimed that Intel engaged in unfair competition by offering rebates to Japanese PC manufacturers who agreed to eliminate or limit purchases of microprocessors made by AMD or a smaller manufacturer, Transmeta. [1]

The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in June 2005. The case was consolidated with thirteen other antitrust suits against Intel by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in November 2005. [2] In July 2007, U.S. District Judge Joseph James Farnan Jr. largely denied Intel's motion to dismiss. [3] The court date, originally scheduled for April 2009, was pushed back to February 2010.

In February 2009 it was reported that Intel had spent at least $116 million to date on legal representation on the antitrust suit. This was inferred from a $50 million lawsuit filed by Intel against one of its insurers; the lawsuit disclosed that Intel had already exhausted $66 million in coverage from two other insurers while fighting the antitrust lawsuit. [4]

Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Deborah Platt Majoras blocked an inquiry into the matter until her departure in March 2008. [5] In June 2008, new FTC Chairman William Kovacic opened an investigation. [6]

This was not the first time AMD has accused Intel Corp. of abusing their power as the leading manufacturer for x86 processors. In 1991, AMD filed an antitrust lawsuit against Intel claiming that they were trying to secure and maintain a monopoly. [7] One year later, a court ruled against Intel, awarding AMD $10 million "plus a royalty-free license to any Intel patents used in AMD's own x86-style processor". [8]

Agreement

In November 2009, Intel agreed to pay AMD $1.25 billion as part of a deal to settle all outstanding legal disputes between the two companies. [9] [10] [11]

That week, Andrew Cuomo, then the Attorney General of New York, who had access to the 200 million documents in discovery and 2,200 hours of witness depositions from the private lawsuit, filed another antitrust lawsuit under similar allegations. [12] That lawsuit was ultimately settled in 2012 by Cuomo's successor for $6.5 million. [13]

In December 2009, the FTC sued Intel. [14] On August 4, 2010, FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz reached a settlement agreement with Intel in which the company agreed to modify its rebate practices and establish a $10 million fund for misled customers. [15] [16]

International actions

In 2005, the Japan Fair Trade Commission issued Intel a cease and desist order. [17] On June 4, 2008, Korea Fair Trade Commission fined Intel US$25.4 million for giving Samsung rebates to not use AMD processors. [18] Some of the manufacturers involved in the case were Dell, HP, Gateway, Acer, Fujitsu, Sony, Toshiba, and Hitachi. [19] [20]

In May 2009, the European Commissioner for Competition, Neelie Kroes, fined Intel a record $1.45 billion (€1.06 billion) and ordered it to end its customer rebate program. [21] [22]

In 2022 the €1.06 billion fine was dropped, but was successively re-imposed in September 2023 as a €376.36 million fine. [23]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AMD</span> American multinational technology company

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) is an American multinational corporation and technology company headquartered in Santa Clara, California and maintains significant operations in Austin, Texas. AMD is a hardware and fabless company that designs and develops central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), system-on-chip (SoC), and high-performance computer solutions. AMD serves a wide range of business and consumer markets, including gaming, data centers, artificial intelligence (AI), and embedded systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intel</span> American multinational technology company

Intel Corporation is an American multinational corporation and technology company headquartered in Santa Clara, California, and incorporated in Delaware. Intel designs, manufactures, and sells computer components such as CPUs and related products for business and consumer markets. It is considered one of the world's largest semiconductor chip manufacturers by revenue and ranked in the Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by revenue for nearly a decade, from 2007 to 2016 fiscal years, until it was removed from the ranking in 2018. In 2020, it was reinstated and ranked 45th, being the 7th-largest technology company in the ranking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States antitrust law</span> American legal system intended to promote competition among businesses

In the United States, antitrust law is a collection of mostly federal laws that govern the conduct and organization of businesses in order to promote economic competition and prevent unjustified monopolies. The three main U.S. antitrust statutes are the Sherman Act of 1890, the Clayton Act of 1914, and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914. These acts serve three major functions. First, Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits price fixing and the operation of cartels, and prohibits other collusive practices that unreasonably restrain trade. Second, Section 7 of the Clayton Act restricts the mergers and acquisitions of organizations that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. Third, Section 2 of the Sherman Act prohibits monopolization.

Price fixing is an anticompetitive agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price is maintained at a given level by controlling supply and demand.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Trade Commission</span> United States government agency

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is an independent agency of the United States government whose principal mission is the enforcement of civil (non-criminal) antitrust law and the promotion of consumer protection. The FTC shares jurisdiction over federal civil antitrust law enforcement with the Department of Justice Antitrust Division. The agency is headquartered in the Federal Trade Commission Building in Washington, DC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Qualcomm</span> American semiconductor company

Qualcomm Incorporated is an American multinational corporation headquartered in San Diego, California, and incorporated in Delaware. It creates semiconductors, software and services related to wireless technology. It owns patents critical to the 5G, 4G, CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA and WCDMA mobile communications standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GO Corporation</span> American software company

GO Corporation was a company founded in 1987 to create pen-based portable computers, and a pen-based operating system and software. It was a pioneer of pen-based computing and was one of the most well-funded start-up companies of its time.

Rambus Inc. is an American technology company that designs, develops and licenses chip interface technologies and architectures that are used in digital electronics products. The company, founded in 1990, is well known for inventing RDRAM and for its intellectual property-based litigation following the introduction of DDR-SDRAM memory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hector Ruiz</span> Chairman and CEO of Advanced Nanotechnology Solutions

Hector de Jesus Ruiz Cardenas is the chairman and CEO of Advanced Nanotechnology Solutions, Inc. and former CEO & executive chairman of semiconductor company Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD).

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is an American multinational for-profit company specializing in health insurance and health care services based in Minnetonka, Minnesota. Selling insurance products under UnitedHealthcare, and health care services under the Optum brand, it is the world's ninth-largest company by revenue and the largest health care company by revenue.

Mylan N.V. was a global generic and specialty pharmaceuticals company. In November 2020, Mylan merged with Upjohn, Pfizer's off-patent medicine division, to form Viatris. Previously, the company was domiciled in the Netherlands, with principal executive offices in Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK and a "Global Center" in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, US.

The multinational technology corporation Apple Inc. has been a participant in various legal proceedings and claims since it began operation and, like its competitors and peers, engages in litigation in its normal course of business for a variety of reasons. In particular, Apple is known for and promotes itself as actively and aggressively enforcing its intellectual property interests. From the 1980s to the present, Apple has been plaintiff or defendant in civil actions in the United States and other countries. Some of these actions have determined significant case law for the information technology industry and many have captured the attention of the public and media. Apple's litigation generally involves intellectual property disputes, but the company has also been a party in lawsuits that include antitrust claims, consumer actions, commercial unfair trade practice suits, defamation claims, and corporate espionage, among other matters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christine A. Varney</span> American lawyer (born 1955)

Christine A. Varney is an American antitrust attorney who served as the U.S. assistant attorney general of the Antitrust Division for the Obama administration and as a Federal Trade commissioner in the Clinton administration. Since August 2011, Varney has been a partner of the New York law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore, where she chairs the antitrust department.

Illumina, Inc. is an American biotechnology company, headquartered in San Diego, California. Incorporated on April 1, 1998, Illumina develops, manufactures, and markets integrated systems for the analysis of genetic variation and biological function. The company provides a line of products and services that serves the sequencing, genotyping and gene expression, and proteomics markets, and serves more than 155 countries.

<i>Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft Corp.</i> Legal case

Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft Corp., also known as Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway Inc., was a long-running patent infringement case between Alcatel-Lucent and Microsoft litigated in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California and appealed multiple times to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Alcatel-Lucent was awarded $1.53 billion in a final verdict in August 2007 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California in San Diego. The damages award was reversed on appeal in September 2009, and the case was returned for a separate trial on the amount of damages.

CVS Health Corporation is an American for-profit healthcare company that owns CVS Pharmacy, a retail pharmacy chain; CVS Caremark, a pharmacy benefits manager; and Aetna, a health insurance provider, among many other brands. The company is the world's second largest healthcare company, behind UnitedHealth Group. In 2023, the company was ranked 64th in the Forbes Global 2000.

Microsoft has been involved in numerous high-profile legal matters that involved litigation over the history of the company, including cases against the United States, the European Union, and competitors.

High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation is a 2010 United States Department of Justice (DOJ) antitrust action and a 2013 civil class action against several Silicon Valley companies for alleged "no cold call" agreements which restrained the recruitment of high-tech employees.

Meta Platforms, Inc., has been involved in many lawsuits since its founding in 2004.

<i>TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation</i> United States class-action lawsuit

The TFT-LCD Antitrust Litigation was a United States class-action lawsuit regarding the worldwide conspiracy to coordinate the prices of Thin-Film Transistor-Liquid Crystal Display (TFT-LCD) panels, which are used to make laptop computers, computer monitors and televisions, between 1999 and 2006. In March 2010, Judge Susan Illston certified two nationwide classes of persons and entities that directly and indirectly purchased TFT-LCDs – for panel purchasers and purchasers of TFT-LCD integrated products; the litigation was followed by multiple suits.

References

  1. ↑ Michael Singer; Dawn Kawamoto. "AMD files antitrust suit against Intel". CNET . Retrieved June 25, 2008.
  2. ↑ In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litig., 403F. Supp. 2d1356 (J.P.M.L.2005).
  3. ↑ In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litig., 496F. Supp. 2d404 (D. Del.2007).
  4. ↑ "Intel Sues an Insurer Over Litigation Costs", Clark, Don.The Wall Street Journal, Monday, February 2, 2009, page B7.
  5. ↑ Labaton, Stephen (October 22, 2007). "F.T.C. Chief Balks at Intel Inquiry". The New York Times . p. A1. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  6. ↑ Labaton, Stephen (June 7, 2008). "In Turnabout, Antitrust Unit Looks at Intel". The New York Times . p. A1. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  7. ↑ 756 F. Supp. 1292 (1991) INTEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., Defendant. And Related Counterclaims
  8. ↑ Michael Singer. "Intel and AMD: A long history in court", CNET.com, June 28, 2005. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.
  9. ↑ US chip maker Intel has agreed to pay rival AMD $1.25bn as part of a deal to settle all outstanding legal disputes between the two companies. " Archived 2009-11-15 at the Wayback Machine "
  10. ↑ Juliana Gruenwald. "Intel Settles Lawsuit With AMD Archived January 25, 2010, at the Wayback Machine ", NationalJournal.com, Tech Daily Dose, Thursday, November 12, 2009.
  11. ↑ In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litig. (Settlement Agreement Between Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and Intel Corporation) (D. Del. November 11, 2009).
  12. ↑ Lohr, Steve; Kanter, James (November 13, 2009). "Intel Pays A.M.D. $1.25 Billion to Settle Disputes". The New York Times . p. B1. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  13. ↑ Freifeld, Karen; Stempel, Jonathan (February 9, 2012). "Intel settles NY antitrust case for just $6.5 million". Reuters . Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  14. ↑ Lohr, Steve (December 17, 2009). "F.T.C. Accuses Intel of Trying to Stifle Competition". The New York Times . p. B1. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  15. ↑ Wyatt, Edward; Vance, Ashlee (August 5, 2010). "Intel Settles With F.T.C. on Antitrust Complaint". The New York Times. p. B1. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  16. ↑ "FTC Settles Charges of Anticompetitive Conduct Against Intel". Federal Trade Commission (Press release). August 4, 2010. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  17. ↑ The Editorial Board (June 15, 2008). "Editorial: The Intel Antitrust Investigation". The New York Times . p. WK11.
  18. ↑ "South Korea to Fine Intel $25.4 Million for Trade Violations". The New York Times. The Associated Press. June 5, 2008. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  19. ↑ Ann Steffora Mutschler. "Intel, AMD antitrust trial pushed back", Electronic News, June 6, 2008. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.
  20. ↑ Arik Hesseldahl. "AMD Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel", Forbes , June 28, 2006. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.
  21. ↑ Kanter, James (May 13, 2009). "Europe Fines Intel a Record $1.45 Billion in Antitrust Case". The New York Times . Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  22. ↑ "Case search – Competition - 37990 Intel". ec.europa.eu. European Commission . Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  23. ↑ "Antitrust: Commission re-imposes €376.36 million fine on Intel for anticompetitive practices in the market for computer chips". ec.europa.eu. September 23, 2023. Archived from the original on October 24, 2023. Retrieved October 30, 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.