United States v. Live Nation Entertainment

Last updated

United States v. Live Nation Entertainment
USDCSDNY.svg
Court United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Full case name United States of America, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Illinois, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of Nevada, State of New Hampshire, State of New Jersey, State of New York, State of North Carolina, State of Ohio, State of Oklahoma, State of Oregon, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, State of South Carolina, State of Tennessee, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Washington, State of West Virginia, State of Wisconsin and State of Wyoming v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster Entertainment, LLC

United States, et al. v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster Entertainment, LLC is an antitrust lawsuit brought by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and twenty-nine states and Washington, D.C., against entertainment company Live Nation Entertainment and its subsidiary Ticketmaster, following the Taylor Swift–Ticketmaster controversy in 2022. [1]

Contents

Filed on May 23, 2024, the lawsuit alleges that Live Nation has a monopoly on the live event sector. [2] The case was filed before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. If successful, Live Nation Entertainment may be forced to sell Ticketmaster. [3]

Background

Politico reported that the lawsuit followed "years of backlash from consumers, rivals and lawmakers against Ticketmaster and its parent company." [3]

Initial merger (2010)

In 2009, Live Nation and Ticketmaster announced plans to merge to become the present-day company Live Nation Entertainment. At the time, Ticketmaster had been dominant in ticket sales for over twenty years. Documents obtained by the DOJ found that Live Nation's entry into the ticketing market in December 2008 posed a threat to Ticketmaster's market share, and the merger effort was announced two months later. [4]

The merger announcement received criticism from artists including Bruce Springsteen and several consumer groups. [5] The DOJ ultimately permitted the merger to proceed, with both parties being required to sign a 10-year consent decree. The agreement was intended to prevent the company from engaging in anti-competitive behavior, including retaliation against independent venues.

Scrutiny since 2010

Following the merger, Live Nation's Ticketmaster faced allegations that it engaged in anti-competitive behavior that violated the 2010 consent decree. In 2019, the DOJ probed the company over allegations that Live Nation leveraged its dominance in concert touring to coerce venues into signing contracts with Ticketmaster. In December 2019, the DOJ announced that Live Nation Entertainment agreed to amend and strengthen the consent decree. [6]

Following the Taylor Swift–Ticketmaster controversy in 2022, congressional lawmakers urged antitrust action against Ticketmaster. [7] In November 2022, it was reported that the DOJ was conducting an antitrust probe into Ticketmaster's compliance with the 2019 agreement. [8] Politico reported in July 2023 that the DOJ's probe into Ticketmaster had progressed, and that a formal antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation was possible. [9]

Lawsuit developments

Twenty-nine state attorneys general and the attorney general for the District of Columbia (blue) joined the DOJ in filing the lawsuit on May 23, 2024 State positions in U.S. v. Live Nation Entertainment.svg
Twenty-nine state attorneys general and the attorney general for the District of Columbia (blue) joined the DOJ in filing the lawsuit on May 23, 2024

On May 23, 2024, the Department of Justice formally announced its antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment, accusing the company of illegally monopolizing the live event market. [2] During a news conference, Attorney General Merrick Garland stated "It is time to break it up" in reference to the company. The DOJ's legal team includes over a dozen attorneys under the leadership of Jonathan Kanter, the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division. [10]

The DOJ was joined in filing the lawsuit by twenty-eight state attorneys general, as well as the attorney general for the District of Columbia. [a] [11] [12] The DOJ and states are pursuing a jury trial in the case. [3] On August 19, 2024, ten additional state attorneys-general joined the lawsuit, bringing the total number of co-plaintiffs to 40. [b] [13]

Public opinion

A poll conducted by Global Strategy Group in 2023 found that 60% of Americans would support efforts to break up Live Nation's Ticketmaster. The proposal was supported by 72% of Democrats, 50% of Republicans, and 46% of independents. [14]

Commentators have noted that the lawsuit follows a number of high-profile antitrust lawsuits launched under the Biden administration, including against Apple, Amazon, and Google. [15] Additionally, on May 24, 2024, a day after the DOJ case was filed, a consumer case seeking $5 billion in damages from Live Nation Entertainment on potentially millions of individuals who purchased tickets through Ticketmaster was filed. [16]

Related Research Articles

Price fixing is an anticompetitive agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price is maintained at a given level by controlling supply and demand.

Ticketmaster Entertainment, LLC is an American ticket sales and distribution company based in Beverly Hills, California, with operations in many countries around the world. In 2010, it merged with Live Nation under the name Live Nation Entertainment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Merrick Garland</span> American lawyer and jurist (born 1952)

Merrick Brian Garland is an American lawyer and jurist who served as the 86th United States attorney general from 2021 to 2025. He previously served as a circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 1997 to 2021. In 2016, President Barack Obama nominated Garland to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the U.S. Senate refused to hold a vote to confirm him.

Tour promoters are the individuals or companies responsible for organizing a live concert tour or special event performance. The tour promoter makes an offer of engagement to a particular artist, usually through the artist's agent or music manager. The promoter and agent then negotiate the live performance contract. The majority of live performance contracts are drawn up using the American Federation of Musicians (AFM) standard contract format known as the AFM Performance Agreement.

Live Nation is an American events promoter and venue operator based in Beverly Hills, California. Founded in 1996 by Robert F. X. Sillerman as SFX Entertainment, the company's business was built around consolidating concert promoters into a national entity to counter the oversized influence of ticket behemoth Ticketmaster. In 2000, the company was sold to Clear Channel Communications for $4.4 billion and operated as Clear Channel Entertainment until 2005, when it was spun off as Live Nation. In 2010, Live Nation merged with the ticketing firm Ticketmaster to form a larger conglomerate named Live Nation Entertainment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christine A. Varney</span> American lawyer (born 1955)

Christine A. Varney is an American antitrust attorney who served as the U.S. assistant attorney general of the Antitrust Division for the Obama administration and as a Federal Trade commissioner in the Clinton administration. Since August 2011, Varney has been a partner of the New York law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore, where she chairs the antitrust department.

Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. is an American multinational entertainment company that was founded in 2010 following the merger of Live Nation and Ticketmaster. It promotes, operates and manages ticket sales for live entertainment internationally. It also owns and operates entertainment venues and manages the careers of music artists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vanita Gupta</span> American lawyer (born 1974)

Vanita Gupta is an American attorney who served as United States Associate Attorney General from April 22, 2021, to February 2, 2024. From 2014 to 2017, Gupta served as Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division under President Barack Obama. She was considered one of the top choices of the Harris campaign for Attorney General.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gene Kimmelman</span>

Eugene I. Kimmelman is an American attorney and consumer protection advocate who specializes in antitrust law. Since January 2021, Kimmelman has served as a senior advisor in the Department of Justice (DOJ). During the Obama administration, Kimmelman served within the DOJ as chief counsel of the Antitrust Division.

High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation is a 2010 United States Department of Justice (DOJ) antitrust action and a 2013 civil class action against several Silicon Valley companies for alleged "no cold call" agreements which restrained the recruitment of high-tech employees.

RealPage, Inc. is an American property management software company, owned by the private equity firm Thoma Bravo, and known for its algorithmic rent setting, which has been accused of antitrust violations and price fixing. Its services are used to manage more than 24 million housing units worldwide in multifamily, commercial, single-family, and vacation rentals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Rapino</span> Canadian-American business executive

Michael Rapino is a Canadian-American businessman and the CEO and president of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc, which was formed in 2010 following the merger of Live Nation and Ticketmaster.

New York v. Deutsche Telekom was a lawsuit filed by nine states and Washington D.C. to block the merger of T-Mobile US and Sprint Corporation. The suit was filed by State Attorneys General from New York, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Washington D.C., Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Virginia, and Wisconsin. The case was led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, with Federal Southern District of New York Judge Victor Marrero presiding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jonathan Kanter</span> American lawyer (born 1973)

Jonathan Seth Kanter is an American lawyer who served as Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) from 2021 to 2024, during the administration of President Joe Biden. Kanter previously worked as an antitrust attorney at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and in private practice.

<i>United States v. Google LLC</i> (2020) Antitrust case alleging Google illegally dominates internet search

United States v. Google LLC is an ongoing federal antitrust case brought by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) against Google LLC on October 20, 2020. The suit alleges that Google has violated the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 by illegally monopolizing the search engine and search advertising markets, most notably on Android devices, as well as with Apple and mobile carriers.

Economic consulting is the practice of providing advanced economic, financial, and statistical analysis for use in litigation, regulatory, and commercial environments. Law firms, state institutions, and other organizations may rely on economic consultants to produce research, analyses, reports, and testimony to be used in trial. Economic consulting also deals with various matters that require data-intensive analyses, such as macroeconomics research, program evaluation, policymaking, and commercial strategies. Economic consultants are typically required to possess knowledge of statistics, econometrics, and computer programming, given the data-oriented nature of economic consulting caseworks.

Jonathan Thomas Skrmetti is an American attorney and public official. He currently serves as the 28th Attorney General and Reporter for the state of Tennessee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taylor Swift–Ticketmaster controversy</span> Concert tour ticket sales issues

The American ticket sales platform Ticketmaster and its parent company Live Nation Entertainment were met with widespread public criticism and political scrutiny over blunders in selling tickets to the 2023 United States leg of the Eras Tour, the sixth concert tour by Taylor Swift, in November 2022. Media outlets described the demand for the Eras Tour's tickets as "astronomical", with 3.5 million people registering for the Ticketmaster's Verified Fan pre-sale program in the U.S.

<i>United States v. Google LLC</i> (2023) Antitrust case alleging Google illegally dominates digital advertising

United States v. Google LLC is an ongoing federal antitrust case brought by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) against Google LLC on January 24, 2023. The suit accuses Google of illegally monopolizing the advertising technology (adtech) market in violation of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. The suit is separate from the first antitrust case launched in 2020 that accuses Google of an illegal monopoly in the search engine market.

<i>United States v. Apple</i> (2024) 2024 American court case

United States, et al. v. Apple Inc. is a lawsuit brought against multinational technology corporation Apple Inc. in 2024. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) alleges that Apple violated antitrust statutes. The lawsuit contrasts the practices of Apple with those of Microsoft in United States v. Microsoft Corp., and alleges that Apple is engaging in similar tactics and committing even more egregious violations. This lawsuit comes in the wake of Epic Games v. Apple and the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act in the European Union.

References

  1. ↑ "U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc and Ticketmaster L.L.C." Antitrust Division. May 23, 2024. Retrieved May 23, 2024.
  2. 1 2 Michaels, Dave; Steele, Anne (May 23, 2024). "Justice Department Sues to Break Up Live Nation-Ticketmaster". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
  3. 1 2 3 Sisco, Josh (May 23, 2024). "DOJ and states sue Live Nation, could seek breakup of company". Politico. Retrieved May 28, 2024.
  4. ↑ Chmielewski, Dawn C.; Fritz, Ben; Lewis, Randy (January 26, 2010). "Ticketmaster-Live Nation merger gets Justice Department's approval". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
  5. ↑ Duke, Alan (February 5, 2009). "Ticketmaster-Live Nation talks raise concerns". CNN. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
  6. ↑ Sisario, Ben; Kang, Cecilia (December 19, 2019). "Citing Violations, U.S. to Toughen Live Nation Accord on Ticketing". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  7. ↑ Cain, Sian (November 24, 2022). "Ticketmaster's Taylor Swift chaos triggers US Senate antitrust hearing". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  8. ↑ McCabe, David; Sisario, Ben (November 18, 2022). "Justice Dept. Is Said to Investigate Ticketmaster's Parent Company". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  9. ↑ Sisco, Josh (July 28, 2023). "Ticketmaster could face new legal threat this fall, sources say". Politico. Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  10. ↑ Scarcella, Mike (May 23, 2024). "US legal team in Live Nation lawsuit includes veteran plaintiffs' attorney". Reuters. Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  11. ↑ "Complaint: U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster L.L.C." United States Department of Justice. May 23, 2024. Retrieved August 19, 2024.
  12. ↑ Weatherbed, Jess (May 23, 2024). "The US government is trying to break up Live Nation-Ticketmaster". The Verge. Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  13. ↑ "Ten Additional States Join Justice Department's Suit Against Live Nation-Ticketmaster for Monopolizing Markets Across the Live Concert Industry". United States Department of Justice. August 19, 2024. Retrieved August 19, 2024. The department, and its now-expanded group of 40 co-plaintiffs, filed an amended complaint in the Southern District of New York.
  14. ↑ Klar, Rebecca (November 14, 2023). "Majority of Americans support breaking up Ticketmaster, Live Nation: Poll". The Hill. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
  15. ↑ Nylen, Leah (May 23, 2024). "The US Antitrust Crusade: A Brief Overview of Cases Against Live Nation, Big Tech". Bloomberg. Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  16. ↑ Scarcella, Mike (May 24, 2024). "Live Nation ticket buyers sue in wake of US Justice Department case". Reuters. Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  1. ↑ The twenty-eight states are as follows: Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming
  2. ↑ The ten states that filed on August 19, 2024 are as follows: Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Mexico, South Dakota, Utah and Vermont
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.