New York v. Deutsche Telekom

Last updated

New York v. Deutsche Telekom

New York v. Deutsche Telekom was a lawsuit filed by nine states and Washington D.C. to block the merger of T-Mobile US and Sprint Corporation. The suit was filed by State Attorneys General from New York, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Washington D.C., Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Virginia, and Wisconsin. The case was led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, with Federal Southern District of New York Judge Victor Marrero presiding. [1] [2]

Contents

Background

The case was filed while the US Department of Justice was in the process of approving the merger of Sprint Corporation and T-Mobile US. The states filed the merger due to concerns that the merger violated antitrust laws, being anti-competitive, would lessen the number of jobs available and would create higher pricing for consumers. NY AG stated, in connection with why the lawsuit was filed that:

When it comes to corporate power, bigger isn't always better. The T-Mobile and Sprint merger would not only cause irreparable harm to mobile subscribers nationwide by cutting access to affordable, reliable wireless service for millions of Americans, but would particularly affect lower-income and minority communities here in New York and in urban areas across the country. That's why we are going to court to stop this merger and protect our consumers, because this is exactly the sort of consumer-harming, job-killing megamerger our antitrust laws were designed to prevent. [1] [2]

The trial was initially set to begin on October 7, 2019.

The trial had many opponents initially, including the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FCC. [3] [4] FCC Chairman Ajit Pai called the lawsuit "misguided" and stated, "And make no mistake about it, government officials trying to block this transaction are working to stop many upstate New Yorkers and other rural Americans from getting access to fast mobile broadband and all of the benefits that come with it." [4]

After the DOJ delayed giving the documents of their settlement with T-Mobile and Sprint, the State AGs requested a delay of the start date of the trial. [5] After consideration and hearing pre-trial arguments, the judge delayed the start of the trial to December 9, 2019. [6] NY AG Letitia James stated once she reviewed the settlement documents between the DOJ and Sprint and T-Mobile that "Our case against T-Mobile is an antitrust violation, obviously we're concerned with anti-competitive behavior. So providing public benefits are good, but it does not address the antitrust violations."

Between the time of the announcement of the trial and the beginning of the trial, eight additional states entered the trial alongside the other State AGs: Pennsylvania, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, and Texas. [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Before the trial began, the defendants entered settlement talks with all the state AGs involved in the case. [12] Due to this, they successfully settled with the AGs of Mississippi, Colorado, Texas, and Nevada prior to the trial beginning. [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] They also attempted to settle with each of the other State AGs, but these talks eventually fell through before the trial began, leaving 14 State AGs in the trial.

Ruling

On February 11, 2020, District Judge Victor Marrero officially announced his decision to side with Sprint and T-Mobile, officially giving federal district court approval to the merger. He stated that "the merger is not likely to substantially lessen competition like the suing state AGs had claimed it would" and also that Sprint "does not have a sustainable long-term competitive strategy [to remain a viable competitor]." [18] [19] [20]

Related Research Articles

<i>United States v. Microsoft Corp.</i> 2001 American antitrust law case

United States v. Microsoft Corporation, 253 F.3d 34, was a landmark American antitrust law case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The U.S. government accused Microsoft of illegally maintaining its monopoly position in the personal computer (PC) market, primarily through the legal and technical restrictions it put on the abilities of PC manufacturers (OEMs) and users to uninstall Internet Explorer and use other programs such as Netscape and Java.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ken Paxton</span> American lawyer and politician

Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. is an American lawyer and politician. A member of the Republican Party, he has been the Attorney General of Texas since January 2015, but has been suspended since May 27, 2023, following his impeachment by the Texas House of Representatives; he is awaiting trial in the Texas Senate. Paxton previously served as Texas State Senator for the 8th district and the Texas State Representative for the 70th district.

Daniel M. Petrocelli is a partner at O’Melveny & Myers LLP and the Chair of the firm’s Trial Practice Committee. Petrocelli is known in part for his work in a 1997 wrongful death civil suit against O. J. Simpson, for representing Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling, and for his leading role in defeating the US Department of Justice’s attempt to block the merger of AT&T and Time Warner.

Vivint Smart Home, Inc. is a smart home company in the United States and Canada, and a subsidiary of NRG Energy. It was founded by Keith Nellesen and Todd Pedersen in 1999.

On March 20, 2011, AT&T announced that it would purchase T-Mobile USA. On August 31, 2011, the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice formally announced that it would seek to block the takeover, and filed a lawsuit to such effect in federal court. The bid was abandoned by AT&T on December 19, 2011.

American Airlines Group Inc. is an American publicly traded airline holding company headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas. It was formed on December 9, 2013, by the merger of AMR Corporation, the parent company of American Airlines and Air Choice One, and US Airways Group, the parent company of US Airways. Integration was completed when the Federal Aviation Administration granted a single operating certificate for both carriers on April 8, 2015, and all flights now operate under the American Airlines brand.

High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation is a 2010 United States Department of Justice (DOJ) antitrust action and a 2013 civil class action against several Silicon Valley companies for alleged "no cold call" agreements which restrained the recruitment of high-tech employees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Makan Delrahim</span> Iranian-American attorney and lobbyist

Makan Delrahim is an Iranian-American attorney and lobbyist. From 2017 to 2021, Delrahim served under President Donald Trump as Assistant Attorney General for the Department of Justice Antitrust Division.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jim Walden (lawyer)</span> American lawyer

James Walden is an American lawyer. After serving in the U.S Department of Justice as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York from 1993 to 2002, he entered private practice where he was involved in several prominent white-collar and antitrust cases in addition to a series of cases seeking governmental reform. He represents Dr. Grigory Rodchenkov, the former head of Russia's anti-doping laboratory. At one time Walden represented former UFC Lightweight champion Conor McGregor in McGregor's pending court case for felony criminal mischief and misdemeanor assault in Brooklyn, NY. Walden has represented plaintiffs in class action lawsuits suits against the New York City Department of Education and the New York City Housing Authority. He served as Special Counsel to a task force created by the Governor of New Jersey to investigate the administration of the state's tax incentive programs.

Our Children's Trust is an American nonprofit public interest law firm based in Oregon that has filed several lawsuits on behalf of youth plaintiffs against state and federal governments, arguing that they are infringing on the youths' rights to a safe climate system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Merger of Sprint Corporation and T-Mobile US</span>

Sprint Corporation and T-Mobile US merged in 2020 in an all shares deal for $26 billion. The deal was announced on April 29, 2018. After a two-year-long approval process the merger closed on April 1, 2020, with T-Mobile emerging as the surviving brand. The Sprint brand was discontinued by T-Mobile on August 2, 2020.

<i>Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms, Inc.</i> United States ongoing antitrust court case

Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms, Inc. is an ongoing antitrust court case brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) against Facebook parent company Meta. Filed in conjunction with 46 states, the lawsuit alleges that Meta has accumulated monopoly power via anti-competitive mergers, with the suit centering on the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New York investigations of The Trump Organization</span> American criminal and civil investigation

Two related investigations by New York State and City officials were opened by 2020 to determine whether the Trump Organization has committed financial fraud. One of these is a criminal case being conducted by the Manhattan district attorney (DA) and the other is a civil case being conducted by the New York State Attorney General (AG). The DA's case has led to two of the organization's subsidiary companies being found guilty of 17 charges including tax fraud and the indictment of Donald Trump, while the AG has succeeded in imposing an independent monitor to prevent future fraud by the organization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State Antitrust Enforcement Venue Act of 2021</span>

The State Antitrust Enforcement Venue Act of 2021 is a proposed antitrust bill in the United States Congress. The legislation was introduced in the House of Representatives by Ken Buck (R-CO) as H.R. 3460 on May 21, 2021. Companion legislation was introduced in the Senate by Mike Lee (R-UT) as S. 1787 on May 24, 2021.

<i>United States v. Google LLC</i> (2020) Antitrust case alleging Google illegally dominates internet search

United States v. Google LLC is an ongoing federal antitrust case brought by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) against Google LLC on October 20, 2020. The suit alleges that Google has violated the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 through anti-competitive behavior in the search engine and search advertising markets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Justice Department investigation into attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election</span> Criminal investigation of Trump 2020

The United States Justice Department investigation into attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election began in early 2021 with investigations and prosecutions of hundreds of individuals who participated in the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol. By early 2022, the investigation had expanded to examine Donald Trump's inner circle, with the Justice Department impaneling several federal grand juries to investigate the attempts to overturn the election. Later in 2022, a special counsel was appointed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arun Subramanian</span> American judge (born 1979)

Arun Srinivas Subramanian is an American lawyer from New York who serves as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New York civil investigation of The Trump Organization</span> American civil investigation

By 2019, New York State Attorney General (AG) Letitia James had begun investigating the Trump Organization for potential financial fraud in a civil capacity. In 2022, James filed a lawsuit against the Trumps, which resulted in the imposition of an independent monitor to prevent future fraud.

<i>United States v. Google LLC</i> (2023) Antitrust case alleging Google illegally dominates digital advertising

United States v. Google LLC is an ongoing federal antitrust case brought by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) against Google LLC on January 24, 2023. The suit accuses Google of illegally monopolizing the advertising technology (adtech) market in violation of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. The suit is separate from an ongoing DOJ antitrust case launched in 2020 accusing Google of illegally monopolizing the search engine market.

References

  1. 1 2 "New York Attorney General and nine other states file lawsuit to block T-Mobile and Sprint's merger" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  2. 1 2 "New York Attorney General James Moves To Block T-Mobile And Sprint Megamerger| New York State Attorney General". ag.ny.gov. Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  3. ↑ "Justice Department reportedly trying to get state AGs to support T-Mobile and Sprint's merger" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  4. 1 2 "FCC Chairman again voices support for T-Mobile-Sprint merger, calls lawsuit against it 'misguided'" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  5. ↑ "State attorneys general seeking delay of T-Mobile-Sprint merger trial" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  6. ↑ Eggerton, John (2 August 2019). "Court Delays Start of T-Mobile-Sprint Suit to December". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  7. ↑ "Texas joining states' lawsuit to block the T-Mobile-Sprint merger" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  8. ↑ "Oregon is the latest state to join lawsuit to block the T-Mobile, Sprint merger" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  9. ↑ "Illinois' Kwame Raoul becomes 17th state AG to join lawsuit against T-Mobile and Sprint merger" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  10. ↑ "Dish's Ergen said to be taking his time with T-Mobile assets deal as four states join lawsuit to block merger" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  11. ↑ "Pennsylvania is the 18th state to join the lawsuit against T-Mobile and Sprint's merger" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  12. ↑ "T-Mobile and Sprint rumored to have started early settlement talks with state AGs" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  13. ↑ "Mississippi announces support for T-Mobile-Sprint merger after reaching new agreement" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  14. ↑ "Colorado leaves T-Mobile-Sprint merger lawsuit after reaching agreements with Dish and T-Mo" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  15. ↑ "New York AG Letitia James says T-Mobile merger commitments don't address antitrust violations" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  16. ↑ "Texas reaches settlement with T-Mobile, withdraws from merger lawsuit" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  17. ↑ "Nevada announces its own settlement with T-Mobile and withdraws from lawsuit against merger" . Retrieved 2020-02-12.
  18. ↑ "T-Mobile Wins Court Approval for $26.5 Billion Sprint Deal". finance.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2020-02-11.
  19. ↑ "Judge approves T-Mobile-Sprint merger" . Retrieved 2020-02-11.
  20. ↑ "T-Mobile and Sprint merger approved by federal judge". Engadget. Retrieved 2020-02-11.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.