Interlocking directorate

Last updated
Network diagram showing interlocks between various U.S. corporations/institutions, and four major media/telecom corporations (circled in red). Media corporation interlocks - 2004.jpg
Network diagram showing interlocks between various U.S. corporations/institutions, and four major media/telecom corporations (circled in red).
Network diagram showing interlocks of the board members of American International Group (AIG), from 2004 with other U.S. corporations. AIG-Interlocks-2004.jpg
Network diagram showing interlocks of the board members of American International Group (AIG), from 2004 with other U.S. corporations.
Network diagram showing interlocks between various U.S. corporations and institutions and the Council on Foreign Relations, in 2004 CFR-Interlocks-2004.jpg
Network diagram showing interlocks between various U.S. corporations and institutions and the Council on Foreign Relations, in 2004

Two or more corporations have interlocking directorates when they share members of their boards of directors or each shares directors with a third firm. A person that sits on multiple boards is known as a multiple director. [1] Two firms have a direct interlock if a director or executive of one firm is also a director of the other, and an indirect interlock if a director of each sits on the board of a third firm. [2]

Contents

This practice, although widespread and lawful, raises questions about the quality and independence of board decisions. In the United States, antitrust law prohibits interlocking directorates within the same industry over collusion concerns, though legal observers have noted that this has long been unenforced. [3] [4] In 2022, the Department of Justice signaled it would enforce laws on anti-competitive interlocking directorates, leading to the resignation of seven directors at five companies in October 2022. [4]

Socio-political importance

According to some observers,[ who? ] interlocks allow for cohesion, coordinated action, and unified political-economic power of corporate executives. They allow corporations to increase their influence by exerting power as a group, and to work together towards common goals. [5] They help corporate executives maintain an advantage, and gain more power over workers and consumers, by reducing intra-class competition and increasing cooperation. [2] [6] In the words of Scott R. Bowman, interlocks "facilitate a community of interest among the elite of the corporate world that supplants the competitive and socially divisive ethos of an earlier stage of capitalism with an ethic of cooperation and a sense of shared values and goals." [7]

Interlocks act as communication channels, enabling information to be shared between boards via multiple directors who have access to inside information for multiple companies. [1] The system of interlocks forms what Michael Useem calls a "transcorporate network, overarching all sectors of business". [8] Interlocks have benefits over trusts, cartels, and other monopolistic/oligopolistic forms of organization, due to their greater fluidity, and lower visibility (making them less open to public scrutiny). [5] They also benefit the involved companies, due to reduced competition, increased information availability for directors, and increased prestige. [2] [9]

Some theorists believe that because multiple directors often have interests in firms in different industries, they are more likely to think in terms of general corporate class interests, rather than simply the narrow interests of individual corporations. [7] [10] [11] Also, these individuals tend to come from wealthy backgrounds, socialize with the upper classes, and tend to have worked their way up the corporate hierarchy, making it more likely that they have internalized values that will cause them to personally support policies that are beneficial to business in general. [7]

Furthermore, multiple directors tend to be more frequently appointed to government positions, and sit on more non-profit/foundation boards than other directors. Thus, these individuals (known as the "inner circle" of the corporate class) tend to contribute disproportionately to the policy-planning and government groups that represent the interests of the corporate class, [12] [13] and are the ones that are most likely to deal with general policy issues and handle political problems for the business class as a whole. [14] These individuals and the people around them are often considered to be the "ruling class" in modern politics. However, they do not wield absolute power, and they are not monolithic, often differing on which policies will best serve the interests of the upper classes. [15]

Interlocks not only occur between corporations, but also between corporations and non-profit institutions such as foundations, think tanks, policy-planning groups, and universities. [16] [17] They can also be seen as a subset of connections in a larger upper class social network which includes all of the aforementioned types of institutions as well as elite social clubs, schools, resorts, and gatherings. [18] [19] Multiple directors are "roughly twice as likely as single directors to be in the Social Register, to have attended a prestigious private school, or to belong to an elite social club." [20]

Modern interlock networks

Analyses of corporate interlocks have found a high degree of interconnectedness amongst large corporations. [21] [22] It has also been shown that inbound interlocks (i.e. a network link from external firms into a focal firm) have a much greater impact and importance than outbound interlocks, a finding that laid the foundation for further research on inter-organizational networks based on overlapping memberships and other linkages such as joint ventures and patent backward and forward citations. [23] Virtually all large U.S. corporations are linked together in a network of interlocks. [24] Most corporations are within 3 or 4 "steps" from each other within this network. [21] Approximately 15–20% of all directors sit on two or more boards. [12]

The largest corporations tend to have the most interlocks, and also tend to have interlocks with each other, placing them at the center of the network. [25] Major banks, in particular, tend to be at the center of the network and have large numbers of interlocks. [26] [27] [28] With the globalization of financial capital following World War II, multinational interlocks have become progressively more common. [29] As the Cold War escalated, well-connected members of the CIA harnessed these interconnections to launder money through front foundations, as well as more substantial institutions such as the Ford Foundation. [30] A relatively small number of individuals—a few dozen—bind this multinational network together by participating in transnational interlocks and sitting on the boards of multiple global policy groups (such as the Council on Foreign Relations). [31]

Legality

In the United States, Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits interlocking directorates by U.S. companies competing in the same industry, if those corporations would violate antitrust laws if combined into a single corporation. However, at least 1 in 8 of the interlocks in the United States are between corporations that are supposedly competitors. [32]

Recent reinvigoration of enforcement

In 2022, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division signaled it would reinvigorate enforcement against anti-competitive interlocking directorates after decades of dormant enforcement. [3] In October 2022, it was reported that antitrust scrutiny brought on by Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter led to the resignation of seven directors from the boards of five companies. [4] According to Bloomberg News , private equity firms including Blackstone Inc. and Apollo Global Management are currently under federal interlocking directorate scrutiny. [33]

1970 graphs

In 1979 Levin and Roy reported [34] on interlocking directors at 797 corporations in 1970 where the board of directors ranged from 3 to 47 members, with a mean size of 13. Only 18% of the 8623 directors were on more than one board, though the mean number of interlockers for a corporation was 8. The components of the graph were 62 isolated boards, four pairs of corporations interlocked by one or more directors, a triad of interlocked corporations, and the greater component of 724 corporations. For an arbitrary pair of corporations in this component the median path length was 3. Levin and Roy tested the graph for cut points and failed to find any with their search starting with corporations with large boards.

In a study of clustering in the graph, Levin and Roy demonstrated the use of a bipartite graph with corporations listed on one side and directors with multiple seats on the other. The clusters become evident in a physical model using elastic bands and paper clips. The directors and corporations are listed arbitrarily to begin and the elastic bands placed as edges of the bipartite graph. Then a perusal of the elastics may suggest a re-ordering on one side or the other with the elastics slightly less tense. After some iteration this procedure reveals a cluster structure in the bipartite graph.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Board of directors</span> Type of governing body for an organisation

A board of directors is an executive committee that jointly supervises the activities of an organization, which can be either a for-profit or a nonprofit organization such as a business, nonprofit organization, or a government agency.

A plutocracy or plutarchy is a society that is ruled or controlled by people of great wealth or income. The first known use of the term in English dates from 1631. Unlike most political systems, plutocracy is not rooted in any established political philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social class</span> Hierarchical social stratification

A social class or social stratum is a grouping of people into a set of hierarchical social categories, the most common being the upper, middle and lower classes. Membership in a social class can for example be dependent on education, wealth, occupation, income, and belonging to a particular subculture or social network.

Corporate governance are mechanisms, processes and relations by which corporations are controlled and operated ("governed").

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political sociology</span> Branch of sociology

Political sociology is an interdisciplinary field of study concerned with exploring how governance and society interact and influence one another at the micro to macro levels of analysis. Interested in the social causes and consequences of how power is distributed and changes throughout and amongst societies, political sociology's focus ranges across individual families to the state as sites of social and political conflict and power contestation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporate social responsibility</span> Form of corporate self-regulation aimed at contributing to social or charitable goals

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) or corporate social impact is a form of international private business self-regulation which aims to contribute to societal goals of a philanthropic, activist, or charitable nature by engaging in, with, or supporting professional service volunteering through pro bono programs, community development, administering monetary grants to non-profit organizations for the public benefit, or to conduct ethically oriented business and investment practices. While once it was possible to describe CSR as an internal organizational policy or a corporate ethic strategy similar to what is now known today as Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG); that time has passed as various companies have pledged to go beyond that or have been mandated or incentivized by governments to have a better impact on the surrounding community. In addition national and international standards, laws, and business models have been developed to facilitate and incentivize this phenomenon. Various organizations have used their authority to push it beyond individual or even industry-wide initiatives. In contrast, it has been considered a form of corporate self-regulation for some time, over the last decade or so it has moved considerably from voluntary decisions at the level of individual organizations to mandatory schemes at regional, national, and international levels. Moreover, scholars and firms are using the term "creating shared value", an extension of corporate social responsibility, to explain ways of doing business in a socially responsible way while making profits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">G. William Domhoff</span>

George William "Bill" Domhoff is a Distinguished Professor Emeritus and research professor of psychology and sociology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and a founding faculty member of UCSC's Cowell College. He is best known as the author of several best-selling sociology books, including Who Rules America? and its seven subsequent editions.

Competition law is the field of law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies. Competition law is implemented through public and private enforcement. It is also known as antitrust law, anti-monopoly law, and trade practices law; the act of pushing for antitrust measures or attacking monopolistic companies is commonly known as trust busting.

Accumulation by dispossession is a concept presented by the Marxist geographer David Harvey. It defines neoliberal capitalist policies that result in a centralization of wealth and power in the hands of a few by dispossessing the public and private entities of their wealth or land. Such policies are visible in many western nations from the 1970s and to the present day. Harvey argues these policies are guided mainly by four practices: privatization, financialization, management and manipulation of crises, and state redistributions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theda Skocpol</span> American sociologist and political scientist (born 1947)

Theda Skocpol is an American sociologist and political scientist, who is currently the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. She is best known as an advocate of the historical-institutional and comparative approaches, as well as her "state autonomy theory". She has written widely for both popular and academic audiences. She has been President of the American Political Science Association and the Social Science History Association.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elite</span> Group or class of persons enjoying superior intellectual, social or economic status

In political and sociological theory, the elite are a small group of powerful people who hold a disproportionate amount of wealth, privilege, political power, or skill in a group. Defined by the Cambridge Dictionary, the "elite" are "those people or organizations that are considered the best or most powerful compared to others of a similar type."

In philosophy, political science and sociology, elite theory is a theory of the State that seeks to describe and explain power relationships in contemporary society. The theory posits that a small minority, consisting of members of the economic elite and policy-planning networks, holds the most power—and that this power is independent of democratic elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pujo Committee</span>

The Pujo Committee was a United States congressional subcommittee in 1912–1913 that was formed to investigate the so-called "money trust", a community of Wall Street bankers and financiers that exerted powerful control over the nation's finances. After a resolution introduced by congressman Charles Lindbergh Sr. for a probe on Wall Street power, congressman Arsène Pujo of Louisiana was authorized to form a subcommittee of the House Committee on Banking and Currency. In 1913–1914, the findings inspired public support for ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment that authorized a federal income tax, passage of the Federal Reserve Act, and passage of the Clayton Antitrust Act.

Economic law is a set of legal rules for regulating economic activity. Economics can be defined as "a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services." The regulation of such phenomena, law, can be defined as "customs, practices, and rules of conduct of a community that are recognized as binding by the community", where "enforcement of the body of rules is through a controlling authority." Accordingly, different states have their own legal infrastructure and produce different provisions of goods and services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporatism</span> Political ideology which advocates the organization of society by corporate groups

Corporatism is a collectivist political ideology which advocates the organisation of society by corporate groups, such as agricultural, labour, military, business, scientific, or guild associations, on the basis of their common interests. The term is derived from the Latin corpus, or "body".

The Invisible Class Empire is a term introduced by Robert Perrucci and Earl Wysong in their book titled, The New Class Society: Goodbye American Dream? The term refers to members of the superclass that are involved in shaping both political and corporate policies. This class of people may be thought of as an empire because members maintain an influence on society through access to a surplus of financial, cultural, human and social capital. These various forms of capital translate into the political force needed to preserve classwide vested interests. Unlike conspiracy theories of power and control, the superclass' political influence is evidenced in the reality of economic and political inequalities that maintain class hierarchies. The term, therefore, refers to "the hidden structures and processes through which superclass leaders, along with their credentialed-class allies, penetrate and dominate the American political system." The empire is "invisible" because many of the individuals involved receive very little or no public attention.

Economic democracy is a socioeconomic philosophy that proposes to shift ownership and decision-making power from corporate shareholders and corporate managers to a larger group of public stakeholders that includes workers, consumers, suppliers, communities and the broader public. No single definition or approach encompasses economic democracy, but most proponents claim that modern property relations externalize costs, subordinate the general well-being to private profit and deny the polity a democratic voice in economic policy decisions. In addition to these moral concerns, economic democracy makes practical claims, such as that it can compensate for capitalism's inherent effective demand gap.

Women in positions of power are women who hold an occupation that gives them great authority, influence, and/or responsibility in government or in businesses. Historically, power has been distributed among the sexes disparately. Power and powerful positions have most often been associated with men as opposed to women. As gender equality increases, women hold more and more powerful positions in different sectors of human endeavors.

William K. Carroll, also known as Bill Carroll, is a professor of Sociology at the University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. He is known for his work on interlocking directorates, corporate power and social movements.

Mark Sheldon Mizruchi is the Robert Cooley Angell Collegiate Professor of Sociology and Barger Family Professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan. He also holds an appointment as Professor of Management and Organizations at the University of Michigan Ross School of Business. His research has focused on the political activity of the U.S. corporate elite over the 20th and 21st centuries. He was influential in the development of social network analysis, and has published research in the fields of organizational theory, economic sociology, and political sociology.

References

  1. 1 2 Scott, 1997: p. 7
  2. 1 2 3 Salinger, 2005: p. 438
  3. 1 2 Demblowski, Denis (November 4, 2022). "DOJ Is Shaking Up World of Interlocking Directorates". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  4. 1 2 3 "U.S. says seven board directors resigned under antitrust pressure". Reuters. 2022-10-19. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  5. 1 2 Salinger, 2005: p. 437
  6. ↑ Mizruchi, Mark S.; Schwartz, Michael (1992). Intercorporate relations: the structural analysis of business. Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN   978-0-521-43794-3.
  7. 1 2 3 Bowman, 1996: p. 21
  8. ↑ Useem, 1986: p. 53
  9. ↑ Dogan, Mattéi (2003). Elite configurations at the apex of power. BRILL. p. 200. ISBN   978-90-04-12808-8.
  10. ↑ Beder, Sharon (2006). Suiting themselves: how corporations drive the global agenda. Earthscan. p. 4. ISBN   978-1-84407-331-3.
  11. ↑ Barrow, Clyde W. (1993). Critical Theories of State: Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Post-Marxist. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 19. ISBN   0-299-13714-7.
  12. 1 2 Domhoff, 2006: pp. 30-31
  13. ↑ Knoke, David (1994). Political networks: the structural perspective. Cambridge University Press. p. 159. ISBN   978-0-521-47762-8.
  14. ↑ Fennema, M. (1982). International networks of banks and industry. Springer. p. 208. ISBN   978-90-247-2620-2.
  15. ↑ Zweig, Michael (2001). The working class majority: America's best kept secret. Cornell University Press. p. 19. ISBN   978-0-8014-8727-9.
  16. ↑ Bowman, 1996: p. 22
  17. ↑ Sklair, Leslie (2001). The Transnational Capitalist Class. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 13. ISBN   978-0-631-22462-4.
  18. ↑ Asimakopoulos, John (2009). "Globally Segmented Labor Markets". Critical Sociology. 35 (2): 175–198. doi:10.1177/0896920508099191. S2CID   145514921.
  19. ↑ Domhoff, 2006: Chapter 3
  20. ↑ Ackerman, Frank (2000). The political economy of inequality. Island Press. p. 55. ISBN   978-1-55963-798-5.
  21. 1 2 Domhoff, 2006: p. 26
  22. ↑ Krantz, Matt (2002-11-24). "Web of board members ties together Corporate America". USA Today.
  23. ↑ Johannes M Pennings, 1980. Interlocking Directorates: San Francisco: Jossey Bass
  24. ↑ Slaughter, Sheila; Rhoades, Gary (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: markets, state, and higher education. JHU Press. p. 234. ISBN   978-0-8018-7949-4.
  25. ↑ Domhoff, 2006: p. 27
  26. ↑ Devine, Fiona (1997). Social class in Ameriontent-Type: multipart/form-datagh University Press. pp. 109–110. ISBN   978-0-7486-0666-5.
  27. ↑ Mintz, Beth & Sia.org; hidegeonoticeCampusAmbasite book (1987). The Power Structure of American Business. University of Chicago Press. p. 135. ISBN   978-0-226-53109-0.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ↑ Glasberg, Davita Silfen (1989). The power of collective purse strings: the effects of bank hegemony on corporations and the state. University of California Press. p. 12. ISBN   978-0-520-06489-8.
  29. ↑ Scott, 1997: pp. 18-19
  30. ↑ Saunders, Frances Stonor (1999). The cultural cold war : the CIA and the world of arts and letters ([New ed.]. ed.). New York: New Press. pp.  138–139. ISBN   1-56584-596-X. Farfield was by no means exceptional in its incestuous character. This was the nature of power in America at this time. The system of private patronage was the pre-eminent model of how small, homogenous groups came to defend America's—and, by definition, their own—interests. Serving at the top of the pile was every self-respecting WASP's ambition. The prize was a trusteeship on either the Ford Foundation or the Rockefeller Foundation, both of which were conscious instruments of covert US policy, with directors and officers who were closely connected to, or even members of American intelligence.
  31. ↑ Carroll, William K.; Carson, Colin (2006). "Neoliberalism, capitalist class formation and the global network of corporations and policy groups". In Plehwe, Dieter; Walpen, Bernhard; Neunhöffer, Gisela (eds.). Neoliberal hegemony: a global critique. Taylor & Francis. p. 66. ISBN   978-0-415-37327-2.
  32. ↑ Wardrip-Fruin, Noah; Montfort, Nick (2003). New Media Reader. MIT Press. p. 480. ISBN   978-0-262-23227-2.
  33. ↑ Nylen, Leah; Lim, Dawn (October 28, 2022). "Private Equity Firms Probed by US on Overlapping Board Seats". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  34. ↑ Joel H. Levin & William H. Roy (1979) "A study of interlocking directorates", pp 349–78 in Perspectives on Social Network Research, editors: Paul W. Holland & Samuel Leinhardt, Academic Press ISBN   9780123525505

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.