Energy East

Last updated

Energy East
(cancelled)
Energy east map.svg
Proposed Energy East Pipeline Route
Location
Country Canada
ProvinceAlberta, New Brunswick
General information
Type Diluted bitumen
Statuscancelled October 5, 2017
Owner TC Energy

The Energy East pipeline was a proposed oil pipeline in Canada. It would have delivered diluted bitumen from Western Canada and North Western United States to Eastern Canada, from receipt points in Alberta, Saskatchewan and North Dakota [1] to refineries and port terminals in New Brunswick and possibly Quebec. The TC PipeLines project would have converted about 3,000 kilometres (1,900 mi) of natural gas pipeline, which currently carries natural gas from Alberta to the Ontario-Quebec border, to diluted bitumen transportation. New pipeline, pump stations, and tank facilities also would have been constructed. The CA$ 12 billion pipeline would have been the longest in North America when complete.

Contents

The project was announced publicly on August 1, 2013, while the Keystone XL pipeline proposal was being debated. In October 2014, TransCanada Pipelines filed its formal project application with the National Energy Board. At the same time a number of groups announced their intention to oppose the pipeline. [2] The project was cancelled on October 5, 2017 by TransCanada. [3]

Project description

The entire length would have been 4,600 kilometres (2,900 mi), with approximately 70 percent (3,000 kilometres; 1,900 mi) being existing pipeline that would have been converted from carrying natural gas to carrying diluted bitumen. The pipeline route would have run from Alberta to New Brunswick, crossing through Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec. The original project proposal included a marine oil export terminal in Cacouna, Quebec, but that configuration was abandoned due to the impact it would have on a beluga whale habitat. [4] The project would have had a capacity of 1.1 million barrels (~200,000 tonnes) of crude oil per day. [5]

Irving Oil had announced plans to build a new $300-million terminal at its Canaport facility in Saint John to export the oil delivered from the pipeline. [6]

Background

In a November 10, 2011 phone call, then-President Barack Obama told then Prime Minister Stephen Harper that the Keystone XL approval process was on hold. [7] In response, Frank McKenna, who was then Canadian Ambassador to the U.S., wrote a Financial Post opinion piece suggesting a west-east pipeline. [7] In June 2013, Irving Oil's Arthur Irving and Frank McKenna discuss the TransCanada negotiations which have frustrated Irving and Irving and TransCanada finally reach a deal. [7] The July 6, 2013 the fire and explosion with a 1-kilometre (0.6 mi) blast radius [8] in the Lac-Mégantic rail disaster, the deadliest rail accident since Canada's confederation in 1867, took place. It was caused by the derailment of a freight train carrying Bakken Formation crude oil. Forty-two people died. [9] About half of Lac-Mégantic, Quebec downtown area was destroyed immediately [10] and almost all the remaining downtown buildings had to be demolished because of petroleum contamination. [11]

There were a number of factors that contributed to TransCanada's October 5, 2017 decision to cancel the Energy East project, including "politics, the energy market and the economics of the energy industry." [7] [Notes 1]

In 2015, National Energy Board members—NEB's chief executive, Peter Watson, Lyne Mercier, Jacques Gauthier and Roland George "derailed" the Board's public hearings and were "forced to recuse themselves from further dealings with Energy East". [12] They had held secret, private meetings in January 2015, with stakeholders, including Jean Charest, former Premier of Quebec who represented TransCanada at the time as a consultant. [13] Board members were "supposed to handle all of their dealings with stakeholders in public." Conservative MP, Lisa Raitt said the board members made a mistake with Energy East. "The NEB is there to make sure they do everything legally, by the book...If I were the minister in charge, I would read them the riot act." [7] [12] Prior to the 2015 general election, then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper renewed the mandates of all nineteen politically-appointed permanent NEB members. [13] This prevented the "incoming government from making its own appointments to the regulator before the next federal election, scheduled for 2019." [13]

The proposed route crossed the "traditional territory of 180 different aboriginal communities", [14] most of which were strongly against it. [15] Each of the 180 may[ clarification needed ] in law have had a veto under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples which Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau had previously vowed to sign and uphold. [16] This veto right was supported by some Canadian oil extraction corporations such as Suncor. [17]

Energy East had generated controversy in various areas. Some communities through which it was proposed to pass (notably North Bay, Kenora, and Thunder Bay) [18] opposed it categorically.

In partial response to these concerns, the NEB had planned to hear aboriginal oral evidence [19] from 70 specific intervenors. [20]

The project was also strongly opposed by some Canadians on scientific grounds. The Pembina Institute released a report urging the National Energy Board to consider the impact on carbon emissions, estimating the project's upstream impact as being between 30 and 32 million tonnes of carbon emissions per year. [21] [22] This position was supported by the Governments of Ontario and Quebec, who had wanted the impact of the project on greenhouse gases examined as part of the National Energy Board review process, but did not oppose the project in principle. [23] The Ontario Energy Board [24] also had right to assert its own conditions and jurisdiction, but did not before the project was cancelled.[ citation needed ]

Another controversial aspect was a new supertanker complex at the eastern end of the pipeline near Quebec City. Exploratory work was put on hold for a month after the Quebec Superior Court found that the Quebec environment ministry had not considered the impact of the project on beluga whales in the area. [25] A public opinion poll held in Quebec found only one-third of Québécois supported the pipeline, while it was supported by one-half of Canadians outside of Quebec. [26]

Project endorsements and process concerns

The project was endorsed by the Liberal Government of New Brunswick, [27] which claimed it would create over 2000 construction jobs in a province with 11% unemployment.[ citation needed ] Former Conservative Party of Canada Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper endorsed the project, as did the Government of Alberta. [28] This endorsement was renewed by the former NDP Premier of Alberta Rachel Notley [29] after her government's election in 2015. The Saskatchewan Legislature unanimously endorsed a motion supporting the pipeline in November 2014, and the Premier of Saskatchewan Brad Wall called on Prime Minister Harper "to take leadership in supporting TransCanada’s proposed Energy East pipeline". [23] Accordingly, the provincial governments of Alberta, Saskatchewan and New Brunswick were in support. Wall and Notley had taken the position that Ontario and Quebec could not "veto" the pipeline. [30]

The Maliseet First Nations raised concerns about the project during National Energy Board board hearings, but the six Maliseet first nations did not take a unified position on the project at that point, saying that they were reserving judgment pending the results of a traditional land use study and technical review. [31] TransCanada said that it would "strive to reach consent" with the First Nations to avoid and mitigate any possible adverse effects of the Energy East pipeline. [32]

Wall's (but not Notley's) position was that provincial equalization could be withheld from provinces that did not support the project. [33] Ontario and Quebec had imposed approval conditions on Energy East [34] but had dropped climate change concerns [35] in December 2014.

After the election of Justin Trudeau as Prime Minister in the 2015 Canadian federal election, and the replacement of Conservative pro-pipeline MPs with Liberal Party of Canada MPs along the entire route of the pipeline in New Brunswick and part of the route in Quebec, the Canadian federal position became unclear. The Prime Minister had strongly condemned the Harper-era process of regulation, citing serious conflict of interest and mandate flaws, [36] and had also promised to "work with the provinces to map out a plan to reduce Canada's collective carbon footprint within 90 days of taking office by putting a price on carbon pollution." Other Harper-era approvals such as Northern Gateway had been sharply criticized [37] and even called a "farce" by some public officials objecting to the lack of oral cross-examination. [38] Northern Gateway was ultimately cancelled as well by the federal government in November 2016.

Notes

  1. ↑ Poitras—who is the author of Pipe Dreams: The Fight for Canada's Energy Future—reported on New Brunswick news for CBC since 2000, and was the author of several books related to New Brunswick, including The Right Fight: Bernard Lord and the Conservative Dilemma, Beaverbrook: A Shattered Legacy, Imaginary Line: Life on an Unfinished Border, and Irving vs. Irving. His book Pipe Dreams won the 2018 Writers' Federation of New Brunswick Book Award for Non-Fiction and was shortlisted for the 2018 Writers' Trust Shaughnessy Cohen Prize for Political Writing and the 2019 JW Dafoe Book Prize. Poitras spoke with a wide variety of Energy East stakeholders in preparing for his book, including leaders in First Nations communities, such as First Nation, Chief Elsie Jack of Carry the Kettle First Nation and Tundra Oil's CEO Ken Neufeld. Pipe Dreams: The Fight for Canada's Energy Future

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Athabasca oil sands</span> Oil and bitumen deposits in Alberta, Canada

The Athabasca oil sands, also known as the Athabasca tar sands, are large deposits of oil sands rich in bitumen, a heavy and viscous form of petroleum, in northeastern Alberta, Canada. These reserves are one of the largest sources of unconventional oil in the world, making Canada a significant player in the global energy market.

The National Energy Program was an energy policy of the Canadian federal government from 1980 to 1985. The economically nationalist policy sought to secure Canadian energy independence, though was strongly opposed by the private sector and the oil-producing Western Canadian provinces, most notably Alberta.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TC Energy</span> Canadian energy company

TC Energy Corporation is a major North American energy company, based in the TC Energy Tower building in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, that develops and operates energy infrastructure in Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The company operates three core businesses: Natural Gas Pipelines, Liquids Pipelines and Energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway</span> Former freight railroad in North America

The Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway was a Class II freight railroad that operated in the U.S. states of Maine and Vermont and the Canadian province of Quebec between 2002 and 2014. It was headquartered in Hermon, Maine.

The Mackenzie Valley Pipeline, also called the Mackenzie River Pipeline, was a proposed project to transport natural gas from the Beaufort Sea through Canada's Northwest Territories to tie into gas pipelines in northern Alberta. The project was first proposed in the early 1970s but was scrapped following an inquiry conducted by Justice Thomas Berger. The project was resurrected in 2004 with a new proposal to transport gas through the sensitive arctic tundra. Probabilistic estimates of hydrocarbons in the Mackenzie Delta and Beaufort Sea regions project that there are natural gas reserves of 1.9 trillion cubic metres. After many delays, the project was officially abandoned in 2017 by the main investment partners citing natural gas prices and the long regulatory process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Petroleum industry in Canada</span>

Petroleum production in Canada is a major industry which is important to the overall economy of North America. Canada has the third largest oil reserves in the world and is the world's fourth largest oil producer and fourth largest oil exporter. In 2019 it produced an average of 750,000 cubic metres per day (4.7 Mbbl/d) of crude oil and equivalent. Of that amount, 64% was upgraded from unconventional oil sands, and the remainder light crude oil, heavy crude oil and natural-gas condensate. Most of the Canadian petroleum production is exported, approximately 600,000 cubic metres per day (3.8 Mbbl/d) in 2019, with 98% of the exports going to the United States. Canada is by far the largest single source of oil imports to the United States, providing 43% of US crude oil imports in 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy policy of Canada</span>

Canada has access to all main sources of energy including oil and gas, coal, hydropower, biomass, solar, geothermal, wind, marine and nuclear. It is the world's second largest producer of uranium, third largest producer of hydro-electricity, fourth largest natural gas producer, and the fifth largest producer of crude oil. In 2006, only Russia, the People's Republic of China, the United States and Saudi Arabia produce more total energy than Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Keystone Pipeline</span> Oil pipeline in North America

The Keystone Pipeline System is an oil pipeline system in Canada and the United States, commissioned in 2010 and owned by TC Energy and, as of March 2020, the Government of Alberta. It runs from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin in Alberta to refineries in Illinois and Texas, and also to oil tank farms and an oil pipeline distribution center in Cushing, Oklahoma.

The Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines were a planned-but-never-built project for a twin pipeline from Bruderheim, Alberta, to Kitimat, British Columbia. The project was active from the mid-2000s to 2016. The eastbound pipeline would have imported natural gas condensate, and the westbound pipeline would have exported diluted bitumen from the Athabasca oil sands to a marine terminal in Kitimat for transportation to Asian markets via oil tankers. The project would have also included terminal facilities with "integrated marine infrastructure at tidewater to accommodate loading and unloading of oil and condensate tankers, and marine transportation of oil and condensate." The CA$7.9 billion project was first proposed in the mid-2000s but was postponed several times. The project plan was developed by Enbridge Inc., a Canadian crude oil and liquids pipeline and storage company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Energy Board</span> Former Canadian government agency

The National Energy Board was an independent economic regulatory agency created in 1959 by the Government of Canada to oversee "international and inter-provincial aspects of the oil, gas and electric utility industries." Its head office was located in Calgary, Alberta.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Irving Oil Refinery</span> Canadian oil refinery in Saint John, New Brunswick

The Irving Oil Refinery is a Canadian oil refinery located in Saint John, New Brunswick. It is currently the largest oil refinery in Canada, capable of processing more than 320,000 barrels (51,000 m3) of crude oil per day. Over 80 per cent of the production is exported to the United States, accounting for 19 per cent of the country's gasoline imports and 75 per cent of Canada's gasoline exports to the US.

Western Canadian Select (WCS) is a heavy sour blend of crude oil that is one of North America's largest heavy crude oil streams and, historically, its cheapest. It was established in December 2004 as a new heavy oil stream by EnCana, Canadian Natural Resources, Petro-Canada and Talisman Energy. It is composed mostly of bitumen blended with sweet synthetic and condensate diluents and 21 existing streams of both conventional and unconventional Alberta heavy crude oils at the large Husky Midstream General Partnership terminal in Hardisty, Alberta. Western Canadian Select—the benchmark for heavy, acidic crudes—is one of many petroleum products from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin oil sands. Calgary-based Husky Energy, now a subsidiary of Cenovus, had joined the initial four founders in 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lac-Mégantic rail disaster</span> 2013 oil train crash in Québec, Canada

The Lac-Mégantic rail disaster occurred in the town of Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, Canada, on July 6, 2013, at approximately 1:14 a.m. EDT, when an unattended 73-car Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway (MMA) freight train carrying Bakken Formation crude oil rolled down a 1.2% grade from Nantes and derailed downtown, resulting in the explosion and fire of multiple tank cars. Forty-seven people were killed. More than thirty buildings in Lac-Mégantic's town centre were destroyed, and all but three of the thirty-nine remaining buildings had to be demolished due to petroleum contamination. Initial newspaper reports described a 1 km (0.6-mile) blast radius.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DOT-111 tank car</span> North American tank car for rail transport

In rail transport, the U.S. DOT-111 tank car, also known as the TC-111 in Canada, is a type of unpressurized general service tank car in common use in North America. Tank cars built to this specification must be circular in cross section, with elliptical, formed heads set convex outward. They have a minimum plate thickness of 7⁄16 inch (11.1 mm) and a maximum capacity of 34,500 US gallons. Tanks may be constructed from carbon steel, aluminum alloy, high alloy steel, or nickel plate steel by fusion welding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Maine & Quebec Railway</span> Freight railroad operating in Canada and the USA

The Central Maine and Québec Railway was a Class II freight railroad operating in the U.S. states of Maine and Vermont and the Canadian province of Quebec with headquarters in Bangor, Maine. It was owned by Railroad Acquisition Holdings, LLC, a subsidiary of Fortress Investment Group, LLC. It is now a subsidiary of Canadian Pacific Railway since June 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fracking in Canada</span>

Fracking in Canada was first used in Alberta in 1953 to extract hydrocarbons from the giant Pembina oil field, the biggest conventional oil field in Alberta, which would have produced very little oil without fracturing. Since then, over 170,000 oil and gas wells have been fractured in Western Canada. Fracking is a process that stimulates natural gas or oil in wellbores to flow more easily by subjecting hydrocarbon reservoirs to pressure through the injection of fluids or gas at depth causing the rock to fracture or to widen existing cracks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trans Mountain pipeline</span> Oil pipeline in southwestern Canada

The Trans Mountain Pipeline System, or simply the Trans Mountain Pipeline (TMPL), is a multiple product pipeline system that carries crude and refined products from Edmonton, Alberta, to the coast of British Columbia, Canada.

The Eagle Spirit Pipeline was a $16-billion, First Nations-owned Canadian pipeline proposed in 2018 and 2019 by businessman Calvin Helin which would have shipped petroleum from Northern Alberta to Prince Rupert, British Columbia.

The Canadian province of Alberta faces a number of environmental issues related to natural resource extraction—including oil and gas industry with its oil sands—endangered species, melting glaciers in banff, floods and droughts, wildfires, and global climate change. While the oil and gas industries generates substantial economic wealth, the Athabasca oil sands, which are situated almost entirely in Alberta, are the "fourth most carbon intensive on the planet behind Algeria, Venezuela and Cameroon" according to an August 8, 2018 article in the American Association for the Advancement of Science's journal Science. This article details some of the environmental issues including past ecological disasters in Alberta and describes some of the efforts at the municipal, provincial and federal level to mitigate the risks and impacts.

References

  1. ↑ Shields, Alexandre (March 15, 2016). "Du pétrole américain pour Énergie Est". Le Devoir (in French). Retrieved March 15, 2016.
  2. ↑ Krugel, Lauren (September 7, 2014). "As Energy East pipeline application nears, communities weigh risks and benefits". CTV News. Bell Media. The Canadian Press. Retrieved September 12, 2014.
  3. ↑ cbc.ca CBC News (October 5, 2017).
  4. ↑ Geoffrey Morgan (April 2, 2015). "TransCanada Corp's decision to shelve Quebec oil terminal plans may delay Energy East pipeline by two years". Financial Post. Retrieved September 13, 2015.
  5. ↑ "Energy East News Release" (Press release). TransCanada. August 1, 2013. Archived from the original on December 13, 2014. Retrieved August 2, 2013.
  6. ↑ The Canadian Press (August 4, 2013). "Irving Oil to build new terminal for Energy East Pipeline project". Global News. Retrieved August 4, 2013.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Poitras, Jacques (September 25, 2018). Pipe Dreams: The Fight for Canada's Energy Future. Viking. p. 360. ISBN   978-0735233355.
  8. ↑ Richard Johnson (July 8, 2013). "Timeline of Key Events in Lac-Megantic, Quebec Train Disaster". National Post.
  9. ↑ "Search resumes in Lac-Mégantic for 5 still missing". July 21, 2013. Retrieved July 21, 2013.
  10. ↑ "Explosions à Lac-Mégantic : un mort confirmé" (in French). Radio-Canada. La Presse Canadienne. July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2013.
  11. ↑ "Une dernière marche au centre-ville pour les résidents de Lac-Mégantic". Radio-Canada Estrie. December 6, 2014.
  12. 1 2 De Souza, Mike (September 29, 2018). "'I would read them the riot act,' says Lisa Raitt in new book about doomed Energy East pipeline". National Observer. Reviews. Retrieved December 7, 2019.
  13. 1 2 3 De Souza, Mike (February 13, 2018). "Trudeau government legislation proposes to jettison Harper appointees at pipeline regulator". National Observer. Retrieved December 7, 2019.
  14. ↑ McCarthy, Shawn (December 8, 2013). "Energy companies struggle with aboriginal needs on pipelines". The Globe and Mail. Ottawa. Retrieved December 7, 2019. Updated May 12, 2018
  15. ↑ "First Nations prepare for fight against Energy East pipeline". The Globe and Mail. May 20, 2014. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  16. ↑ "Trudeau and Mulcair make pitches at AFN assembly in Montreal". July 7, 2015. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  17. ↑ "Resources firms endorse call for aboriginal veto rights to projects". Myinforms. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  18. ↑ "Energy East facing many foes: land owners, enviros, Aboriginals and politicians". The Vancouver Observer. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  19. ↑ "National Energy Board to hear oral Aboriginal traditional evidence for Energy East Project". The Business Journals. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  20. ↑ National Energy Board (July 16, 2015). "NEB issues list of Aboriginal Intervenors for Energy East" . Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  21. ↑ McCarthy, Shawn (February 6, 2014). "Pipeline protesters turn focus to Energy East". The Globe and Mail.
  22. ↑ Climate Implications of the Proposed Energy East Pipeline (Report). The Pembina Institute. February 6, 2014.
  23. 1 2 Zilio, Michelle (November 30, 2014). "Harper should take lead with Energy East pipeline, Sask. premier says". CTV News.
  24. ↑ "Energy East: "Treaty and Aboriginal rights must be respected"". The Canadian Progressive. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  25. ↑ "Energy East pipeline terminal delayed by protests in Quebec". The Council of Canadians. October 20, 2014.
  26. ↑ Beaudin, Monique (November 19, 2014). "Poll shows few Quebecers support Energy East pipeline". Montreal Gazette.
  27. ↑ "New Brunswick, Alberta join forces to push Energy East pipeline". The Globe and Mail. October 30, 2015. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  28. ↑ Jane Taber (August 9, 2013). "Harper hails west-east pipeline as N.B. seeks to halt exodus of workers". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved August 9, 2013.
  29. ↑ Chris Fournier and Aoyon Ashraf and Jeremy van Loon, Bloomberg News (September 30, 2015). "Alberta's Notley says she supports Trans Mountain, Energy East pipelines". Financial Post. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  30. ↑ Don Braid, Postmedia News (July 17, 2015). "Rachel Notley calls out Brad Wall: There are better ways to promote Energy East than 'having a tantrum' - National Post". National Post. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  31. ↑ Maliseet First Nations voice concerns on Energy East pipeline, CBC News (August 16, 2016).
  32. ↑ TransCanada will 'strive to reach consent,' and avoid, mitigate any potential effects, VP tells public hearing, CBC News (August 10, 2016).
  33. ↑ Don Braid, Postmedia News (July 16, 2015). "Don Braid: Brad Wall is right: provinces need to get out of the way of pipeline approvals". National Post. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  34. ↑ "TransCanada chief slams 'ludicrous' arguments by Energy East opponents". The Globe and Mail. December 29, 2015. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  35. ↑ "Wynne drops main climate change requirement in considering Energy East pipeline". The Globe and Mail. December 3, 2014. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  36. ↑ "Liberals would bolster National Energy Board reviews: Trudeau". Toronto Sun. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
  37. ↑ theprovince.com.
  38. ↑ "Kinder Morgan pipeline hearings a 'farce,' says former BC Hydro head". November 3, 2014. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.