Environment America

Last updated
Environment America
Founded2007 [1]
Type Nonprofit
20-5355252
Legal status 501(c)(4)
Location
Fields Environmentalism
Key people
Wendy Wendlandt, President
Doug Phelps, Chairman
Revenue (2019-2020)
$22,858,363 [2]
Expenses (2019-2020)$11,825,834 [2]
Website environmentamerica.org

Environment America is a federation of state-based environmental advocacy organizations in the United States. [3] [4] The organization researches and advocates for environmental policies through lobbying, litigation, [5] and the mobilization of public support. [6] Environment America advocates new laws and policies to address climate change, [7] air pollution [8] and water pollution, [9] and is a proponent of clean energy, [10] while opposing offshore drilling. [11]

Contents

History

On November 5, 2007, Environment America separated from the state Public Interest Research Groups (PIRG), bringing with it the organization's national environmental advocacy program. The federation combined several small, state-based advocacy groups that had already separated from the PIRGs. [12] As a result of the separation of the organizations, the PIRGs' scope of work was defined as consumer, [13] health, [14] and safety issues [15] while Environment America became responsible for the group's previous environmental work. Doug Phelps, who helped build the state PIRG network, became the group's new chair. [16]

Aims and activities

Environment America works to publicize and gain support for solving environmental problems in the United States. Its areas of interest include the use of renewable energy sources, [17] climate change, air pollution, fossil fuel dependency, [18] environmental conservation, [19] and offshore drilling. The organization releases reports on topics such as wind energy policy, [20] solar energy, [21] global warming, [22] mercury pollution, [23] companies’ compliance with the Clean Water Act, [24] energy efficient buildings, [25] extreme weather in the U.S., [26] fuel efficient cars, [27] and levels of carcinogens in waterways. [28]

Climate activist at Capitol South Metro in 2019 Climate activist at Capitol South Metro in 2019 dressed in Polar Bear Costume - Support Arctic Wildlife.jpg
Climate activist at Capitol South Metro in 2019

Environment America has worked on various environmental policies, including supporting the American Clean Energy and Security Act [29] and the Clean Power Plan [30] to reduce climate pollution; the Clean Water Rule to include streams and wetlands in Clean Water Act protections; [31] and the EPA's proposal for a revised fuel economy label. [32]

The organization has sought to influence environmental policy through politics. Environment America publishes an annual scorecard of members of the U.S. Congress based on how they voted on environmental issues in that year's session. Members of the Democratic Party typically score higher than members of the Republican Party on the scorecard. [33] The organization has endorsed both Republican and Democratic candidates during national elections. [34] [35] In 2008 and 2012, it joined the Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters and Clean Water Action in endorsing Barack Obama’s reelection to office. [36]

In 2012, Environment America contributed $550,000 to Fair Share Action, an independent expenditure committee also funded by Tim Gill. The group conducted get-out-the-vote efforts in support of President Barack Obama during his 2012 reelection campaign. [37]

Ratings

In its December 1, 2019, evaluation of Environment America, Charity Navigator gave the organization two of four stars, with two stars for "financial" and three stars for "accountability and transparency". With respect to the latter, several concerns were indicated by Charity Navigator: the FY 2018 Form 990 audited financials did not appear to be prepared by an independent accountant, and the organization's website lacked an easily accessible donor privacy policy and audited financials. [38]

State affiliates

Environment America has 29 state affiliates, [39] including Environment California and Environment Oregon.

Environment California

Environment California has supported environmental campaigns within California including statewide bans on plastic bags, [40] the reduction of energy inefficient appliances, [41] and the expansion of the state's solar metering program [42] and solar energy production. [43] The advocacy group has also worked to reform California’s renewable energy policies. [17] [44] Environment California supported a law that Governor Jerry Brown signed in 2011 which mandated that 33% of the state's energy must come from renewable sources by 2020, an increase from the previous requirement of 20%. [45]

Environment California released reports on the energy consumption of public schools, [46] solar projects on school campuses, [47] Californian cities' solar power production, [48] [49] "green job" training programs within the state, [50] and the costs of fossil fuels. [18]

Environment Texas

In 2009, Environment Texas and the Sierra Club filed similar lawsuits against Chevron Phillips for alleged violations of pollution limits [51] and Shell for alleged illegal air pollution emissions. [52] Shell agreed to pay a $5.8 million settlement, reduce emissions from its Deer Park refinery by 80%, upgrade chemical units, and reduce gas flaring. [53] The following year, the environmental groups sued the largest oil refinery in the United States, ExxonMobil, accusing it of violating the Clean Air Act through the release of emissions from refineries and chemical plants in the Texas Gulf coast. [54]

PennEnvironment

PennEnvironment has released several reports that analyze environmental concerns in Pennsylvania including counties' recycling fees, [55] the dumping of toxic chemicals by industrial facilities into the state’s waterways, [56] and the building of roads and logging in the Allegheny National Forest. [19] Another report released by the state affiliate found that power plants fueled by coal in the state release large amounts of pollution that contribute to unhealthy smog and put susceptible populations at risk. In 2011, PennEnvironment condemned the government's decision to reject stricter air pollution regulations that would diminish ground-level ozone, the main component of harmful smog. [57]

In 2012, PennEnvironment, along with the Sierra Club, sued PPG Industries for the contamination of lagoons and a solid waste landfill at the company's Ford City site near the Allegheny River which resulted from the disposal of glass polishing waste. [58] Chemical testing revealed high levels of arsenic, lead, antimony, iron and chromium at the site. [58] The environmental groups claimed that the company violated the Clean Water Act and Resources Conservation and Recovery Act and failed to follow an administrative order issued by the DEP under the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law to clean up the site in 2009. [58]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Natural Resources Defense Council</span> Non-profit environmental advocacy group

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is a United States–based 501(c)(3) non-profit international environmental advocacy group, with its headquarters in New York City and offices in Washington, D.C., San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Bozeman, India, and Beijing. The group was founded in 1970 in opposition to a hydro-electric power power plant in New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sierra Club</span> Environmental nonprofit membership association based in the United States

The Sierra Club is an American environmental organization with chapters in all 50 U.S. states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico. The club was founded in 1892, in San Francisco, by preservationist John Muir. A product of the progressive movement, it was one of the first large-scale environmental preservation organizations in the world. Since the 1950s, it has lobbied politicians to promote environmentalist policies, even if they are controversial. Recent goals include promoting sustainable energy and mitigating global warming, as well as opposing the use of coal, hydropower, and nuclear power. Its political endorsements generally favor liberal and progressive candidates in elections.

The Energy Task Force, officially the National Energy Policy Development Group (NEPDG), was a task force created by U.S. President George W. Bush in 2001 during his second week in office. Vice President Dick Cheney was named chairman. This group's stated objective was to “develop a national energy policy designed to help the private sector, and, as necessary and appropriate, State and local governments, promote dependable, affordable, and environmentally sound production and distribution of energy for the future." The final report was released on May 16, 2001.

The Environmental Law and Policy Center (ELPC) is a Midwest-based non-profit environmental advocacy group, with offices in Chicago, Columbus (Ohio), Des Moines (Iowa), Duluth (Minnesota), Jamestown (North Dakota), Madison (Wisconsin), Sioux Falls (South Dakota), and Washington, D.C. ELPC's mission is to advance environmental progress and economic development together throughout the Midwest through projects that advance clean energy, clean air, clean water and clean transportation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy commercialization</span> Deployment of technologies harnessing easily replenished natural resources

Renewable energy commercialization involves the deployment of three generations of renewable energy technologies dating back more than 100 years. First-generation technologies, which are already mature and economically competitive, include biomass, hydroelectricity, geothermal power and heat. Second-generation technologies are market-ready and are being deployed at the present time; they include solar heating, photovoltaics, wind power, solar thermal power stations, and modern forms of bioenergy. Third-generation technologies require continued R&D efforts in order to make large contributions on a global scale and include advanced biomass gasification, hot-dry-rock geothermal power, and ocean energy. In 2019, nearly 75% of new installed electricity generation capacity used renewable energy and the International Energy Agency (IEA) has predicted that by 2025, renewable capacity will meet 35% of global power generation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in the United States</span>

According to data from the US Energy Information Administration, renewable energy accounted for 8.4% of total primary energy production and 21% of total utility-scale electricity generation in the United States in 2022.

Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future (PennFuture) is a nonprofit environmental advocacy organization based in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States. As of 2021, the organization has five offices across Pennsylvania: Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, Mt. Pocono and Erie.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green-collar worker</span> Environmental-sector worker

A green-collar worker is a worker who is employed in an environmental sector of the economy. Environmental green-collar workers satisfy the demand for green development. Generally, they implement environmentally conscious design, policy, and technology to improve conservation and sustainability. Formal environmental regulations as well as informal social expectations are pushing many firms to seek professionals with expertise with environmental, energy efficiency, and clean renewable energy issues. They often seek to make their output more sustainable, and thus more favorable to public opinion, governmental regulation, and the Earth's ecology.

Green jobs are, according to the United Nations Environment Program, "work in agricultural, manufacturing, research and development (R&D), administrative, and service activities that contribute(s) substantially to preserving or restoring environmental quality. Specifically, but not exclusively, this includes jobs that help to protect ecosystems and biodiversity; reduce energy, materials, and water consumption through high efficiency strategies; de-carbonize the economy; and minimize or altogether avoid generation of all forms of waste and pollution." The environmental sector has the dual benefit of mitigating environmental challenges as well as helping economic growth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental policy of the United States</span> Governmental action to protect the environment

The environmental policy of the United States is a federal governmental action to regulate activities that have an environmental impact in the United States. The goal of environmental policy is to protect the environment for future generations while interfering as little as possible with the efficiency of commerce or the liberty of the people and to limit inequity in who is burdened with environmental costs. As his first official act bringing in the 1970s, President Richard Nixon signed the U.S. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) into law on New Year's Day, 1970. Also in the same year, America began celebrating Earth Day, which has been called "the big bang of U.S. environmental politics, launching the country on a sweeping social learning curve about ecological management never before experienced or attempted in any other nation." NEPA established a comprehensive US national environmental policy and created the requirement to prepare an environmental impact statement for "major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment." Author and consultant Charles H. Eccleston has called NEPA the world's "environmental Magna Carta".

New Energy for America was a plan led by President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden beginning in 2008 to invest in renewable energy sources, reduce reliance on foreign oil, address global warming issues, and create jobs for Americans. The main objective of the New Energy for America plan was to implement clean energy sources in the United States to switch from nonrenewable resources to renewable resources. The plan led by the Obama Administration aimed to implement short-term solutions to provide immediate relief from pain at the pump, and mid- to- long-term solutions to provide a New Energy for America plan. The goals of the clean energy plan hoped to: invest in renewable technologies that will boost domestic manufacturing and increase homegrown energy, invest in training for workers of clean technologies, strengthen the middle class, and help the economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Z. Jacobson</span> American climatologist and engineer (born 1965)

Mark Zachary Jacobson is a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University and director of its Atmosphere/Energy Program. He is also a co-founder of the non-profit, Solutions Project.

The natural environment, commonly referred to simply as the environment, includes all living and non-living things occurring naturally on Earth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phil Radford</span> American environmentalist

Philip David Radford is an American environmental leader serving as Chief Strategy Officer of the Sierra Club, and who served as the executive director of Greenpeace USA. He was the founder and President of Progressive Power Lab, an organization that incubates companies and non-profits that build capacity for progressive organizations, including a donor advisory organization Champion.us, the Progressive Multiplier Fund and Membership Drive. Radford is a co-founder of the Democracy Initiative, was founder and executive director of Power Shift, and is a board member of the Mertz Gilmore Foundation. He has a background in grassroots organizing, corporate social responsibility, climate change, and clean energy.

The climate change policy of the United States has major impacts on global climate change and global climate change mitigation. This is because the United States is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gasses in the world after China, and is among the countries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person in the world. Cumulatively, the United States has emitted over a trillion metric tons of greenhouse gases, more than any country in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy policy of the Barack Obama administration</span> American presidential policy

The energy policy of the Obama administration was defined by an "all-of-the-above" approach which offered federal support for renewable energy deployment, increased domestic oil and gas extraction, and export of crude oil and natural gas. His presidency's first term was shaped by the failure of his signature climate legislation, the American Clean Energy and Security Act, to pass, and then climate and energy disasters including the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 and then Hurricane Sandy, which took place during the 2012 election. In his second term, Obama lifted the ban on crude oil exports and approved liquified natural gas exports; his planned regulatory approach to reducing greenhouse pollution in the electricity sector, the Clean Power Plan, was blocked by the U.S. Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy usage of the United States military</span>

The United States Department of Defense is one of the largest single consumers of energy in the world, responsible for 93% of all US government fuel consumption in 2007 (Air Force: 52%; Navy: 33%; Army: 7%. Other DoD: 1%). In FY 2006, the DoD used almost 30,000 gigawatt hours (GWH) of electricity, at a cost of almost $2.2 billion. The DoD's electricity use would supply enough electricity to power more than 2.3 million average American homes. In electricity consumption, if it were a country, the DoD would rank 58th in the world, using slightly less than Denmark and slightly more than Syria (CIA World Factbook, 2006). The Department of Defense uses 4,600,000,000 US gallons (1.7×1010 L) of fuel annually, an average of 12,600,000 US gallons (48,000,000 L) of fuel per day. A large Army division may use about 6,000 US gallons (23,000 L) per day. According to the 2005 CIA World Factbook, if it were a country, the DoD would rank 34th in the world in average daily oil use, coming in just behind Iraq and just ahead of Sweden.

Communities for a Better Environment (CBE), previously known as Citizens for a Better Environment, is a policy-focused non-profit organization started in 1971 by Marc Anderson and David Come in Chicago, Illinois. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, CBE expanded to California, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. CBE established itself in San Francisco in 1978 and expanded to Los Angeles in 1982. Today, CBE is based in Oakland, CA and Huntington Park, CA, effecting positive change in communities throughout California, including Richmond, East Oakland, Vernon, Huntington Park, Boyle Heights, Pacoima, Wilmington, and SE Los Angeles. CBE was the first environmental organization to practice door-to-door canvassing by directly involving community members. In 1980, CBE won the United States Supreme Court decision on Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment 444 U.S. 620, protecting the 1st and 14th Amendment Rights of door-to-door activists with CBE and countless other public interest organizations. CBE's early combination of grassroots organizing with research and legal work provided the innovative edge needed to challenge large-scale industries and refineries, and government policies.

The environmental policy of the Donald Trump administration represented a shift from the policy priorities and goals of the preceding Barack Obama administration. Where President Obama's environmental agenda prioritized the reduction of carbon emissions through the use of renewable energy with the goal of conserving the environment for future generations, the Trump administration policy was for the US to attain energy independence based on fossil fuel use and to rescind many environmental regulations. By the end of Trump's term, his administration had rolled back 98 environmental rules and regulations, leaving an additional 14 rollbacks still in progress. As of early 2021, the Biden administration was making a public accounting of regulatory decisions under the Trump administration that had been influenced by politics rather than science.

Fossil fuel regulations are part of the energy policy in the United States and have gained major significance with the nation's strong dependence on fossil fuel-based energy. Regulatory processes are established at the federal and state level due to the immense economic, socio-political and environmental impact of fossil fuel extraction and production. Over 80% of the United States' energy comes from fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil. The Bush administration was marked by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which provided a monetary incentive for renewable energy adoption and addressed the issue of climate change. The Obama administration was made up of advocates for renewable energy and natural gas, while Donald Trump built his campaign on promises to revive the coal industry.

References

  1. Stein, Karen F. (2013). Rachel Carson: Challenging Authors. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN   9789462090682.
  2. 1 2 "Guidestar - Environment America, IRS Form 990" (PDF). Guidestar. Retrieved 2022-09-04.
  3. Howard, Jordan (September 2, 2011). "Green Groups Struggle With Obama's Mixed Environmental Record". Huffington Post.
  4. Gerken, James; Rael, Andrea (October 11, 2013). "'Fracking By The Numbers' Report Urges U.S. To Ban 'Environmental Nightmare'". Huffington Post. Retrieved 17 March 2015.
  5. Kelly, Eileen (November 15, 2017). "Settlement proposed in lawsuit against chicken-processing plant that dumps into Sewanee River". Florida Times-Union.
  6. Guillén, Alex (January 23, 2013). "Obama must balance call for climate action with Keystone decision - 2012 TransCanada lobbying drops off - BP fears four missing employees in Algeria dead". Politico.
  7. Barringer, Felicity (December 5, 2007). "Precipitation Across U.S. Intensifies Over 50 Years". New York Times. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
  8. McCarty, James (April 13, 2017). "Akron, Cleveland, Youngstown air pollution still among Ohio's worst". Cleveland Plain Dealer.
  9. Snider, Annie (April 18, 2017). "Pruitt allies explore hiring private lawyers to rewrite EPA rule". Politico.
  10. Mulkern, Anne (January 20, 2011). "Buzz Builds for 'Clean Energy' Standard, but Passage Won't Be Easy". New York Times. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
  11. Neuman, Scott (May 25, 2010). "As BP Backlash Grows, So Do Calls for Boycott". NPR.
  12. Newton, David (2015). Fracking: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO. p. 186. ISBN   9781610696920.
  13. Lazarus, David (April 17, 2018). "A good consumer agency is a weak consumer agency, says Trump's consumer watchdog". Los Angeles Times.
  14. Wattles, Jackie (April 10, 2017). "KFC promises to ditch antibiotic-laden chicken". CNN.
  15. Krause, Nancy (November 21, 2018). "Trouble in Toyland: US PIRG lists dangerous toys for holiday season". WPRI.
  16. Brobeck, Stephen (2015). Watchdogs and Whistleblowers: A Reference Guide to Consumer Activism. ABC-CLIO. p. 390. ISBN   978-1440829994.
  17. 1 2 Shauk, Zain (September 14, 2009). "Legislators pass renewable energy bills". Glendale News-Press.
  18. 1 2 Seba, Tony (2013-02-17). "Cheap Hot Water? Just Add Sunshine". The Wall Street Journal.
  19. 1 2 Cotton, Josh (September 20, 2012). "Enviro group, reps at odds on ANF". Times Observer. Archived from the original on October 5, 2013. Retrieved August 30, 2018.
  20. "Environment America Report Enhances Case for Wind PTC Extension" (Press release). Office of Senator Michael Bennet. November 28, 2012. Archived from the original on March 6, 2013. Retrieved August 30, 2018.
  21. Mai, HJ (April 4, 2018). "Honolulu leads nation in installed solar capacity per capita". Honolulu Business Journal.
  22. Learn, Scott (December 4, 2009). "U.S. states have taken big steps to cut greenhouse gas emissions, report says". Oregonian.
  23. Biddle, Tami (March 18, 2011). "Mercury Pollution Concerns Grow". PennLive.
  24. Pipkin, Whitney; Harp, David (October 21, 2017). "Poultry Expansion on VA Shore Draws Scrutiny after Tyson Plant Pollution". Bay Journal.
  25. Koch, Wendy (March 8, 2012). "As gas prices soar, studies tout energy efficiency". USA Today.
  26. Klernan, Kate (February 13, 2013). "Blizzard provokes climate change debate among scientists". The Brown Daily Herald.
  27. Lew, Denise (June 27, 2012). "Powering Down Oil?". The Connection.
  28. Goodenow, Evan (April 24, 2012). "Lake Erie ranks in nation's top 50 for carcinogens dumped into water". The Chronicle-Telegram.
  29. Mackinder, Evan (August 23, 2010). "Pro-Environment Groups Outmatched, Outspent in Battle Over Climate Change Legislation". Open Secrets.
  30. Goldberg, Suzanne (February 9, 2016). "Supreme Court to block Obama's sweeping climate change plan". The Guardian.
  31. Johnson, Tom (July 27, 2017). "Fed rollback of clean water rule could threaten half of NJ's streams". NJ Spotlight.
  32. Sierra Club (2010). "Sierra Club Comments EPA Proposed Fuel Economy Label" (PDF). Sierra Club. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-15. Retrieved 2013-01-04.
  33. Nichols, Lee (2010-01-08). "Congressional Scorecard: Making the Green Grade". The Austin Chronicle. Archived from the original on January 31, 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-06.
  34. Greene, Brian (April 19, 2012). "Environmental Groups Endorse Obama". U.S. News & World Report.
  35. DeRosier, John (March 15, 2017). "LoBiondo urging fellow Republicans to accept climate change". The Press of Atlantic City.
  36. Eilperin, Juliet (2012-04-18). "Obama endorsed by major environmental groups". Washington Post.
  37. Karen Crummy, Democratic activist Tim Gill heavily funded federal super PAC, Denver Post (October 27, 2012).
  38. "Charity Navigator - Rating for Environment America Research and Policy Center". Charity Navigator. Retrieved 2020-09-11.
  39. The Public Interest Network (n.d.). "Action in the States". [The Public Interest Network]. Archived from the original on 2012-07-06. Retrieved 2013-01-11.
  40. Lee, Mike (July 8, 2012). "Bill to ban plastic bags advances in Sacramento". The San Diego Union Tribune.
  41. Lee, Mike (2006-07-25). "Even in energy-efficient world, devices' drain powerful". San Diego Union-Tribune. Archived from the original on April 12, 2013. Retrieved 2018-06-19.
  42. Meyers, Glenn (November 13, 2015). "California Net Metering Petition Gains Traction". CleanTechnica .
  43. Shih, Gerry (2009-10-16). "Consumers Pay the Price". New York Times.
  44. Wycoff, Ann (2009). "The Whirlwind Tour: Windmills in California". [ Wandermelon]. Archived from the original on 2013-04-26. Retrieved 2013-02-17.
  45. McGreevy, Patrick (2011-04-13). "Gov. Brown signs law requiring 33% of energy be renewable by 2020". Los Angeles Times.
  46. Keller, Ben (2012). "Schools go solar to save cash, revive programs". [The Business Journal]. Archived from the original on 2013-01-25. Retrieved 2013-02-17.
  47. "Survey: California Schools Going Solar". United Press International. UPI. November 16, 2012.
  48. Turner, Dan (April 24, 2012). "Cloudy Skies for LA's Solar Efforts". Los Angeles Times.
  49. Seba, Tony (April 24, 2012). "Five Reasons Why California Cities Will Build One Million Solar Roofs and 12 Distributed GW by 2020". Forbes.
  50. Smith, Kevin (August 6, 2011). "Green Jobs Training Traction in California, But More Jobs Needed in All Sectors". Whittier Daily News.
  51. Seba, Erwin (August 19, 2009). "Green Groups Sue Chevron Phillips Over Pollution". Reuters.
  52. "Exxon Mobile Sued Over Oil Refinery, Air Laws". NBC. Associated Press. December 14, 2010.
  53. Mouawad, Jad (April 23, 2009). "Shell Settles Air Pollution Accusations". New York Times.
  54. "Exxon Mobil sued over oil refinery, air laws". NBC News. December 14, 2010.
  55. Portnoy, Jenna (October 8, 2011). "DEP blocks Pa. counties from collecting recycling fees". The Morning Call.
  56. Adkins, Jared (January 1, 2012). "Pennsylvania Water 7th Most Polluted in Nation". PennEnvironment.
  57. Sapatkin, Don (January 4, 2013). "Smog in Phila.'s air actually worse than people think, environmental group says". Philly.com. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
  58. 1 2 3 Spencer, Malla (April 20, 2014). "PennEnvironment, Sierra Club sue PPG over Ford City site". Pittsburgh Business Times.