Essential fish habitat

Last updated

Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) was defined by the U.S. Congress in the 1996 amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, or Magnuson-Stevens Act, as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding or growth to maturity." [1] Implementing regulations clarified that waters include all aquatic areas and their physical, chemical, and biological properties; substrate includes the associated biological communities that make these areas suitable for fish habitats, and the description and identification of EFH should include habitats used at any time during the species' life cycle. [2] EFH includes all types of aquatic habitat, such as wetlands, coral reefs, sand, seagrasses, and rivers. [3]

Contents

NOAA Fisheries works with the regional fishery management councils to designate EFH using the best available scientific information. EFH has been described for more than a 1,000 managed species to date. [4] The main purpose of EFH regulations is to minimize the adverse effects of fishing and non fishing impacts on EFH to the maximum extent practicable.

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act

In 1996, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act was amended to establish a new requirements to identify and describe EFH to protect, conserve and enhance EFH for the benefit of the fisheries. [5] The Magnuson-Stevens Act has jurisdiction over the management and conservation of marine fish species. Federal agencies must consult with NOAA Fisheries when their actions or activities may adversely affect habitat identified by federal regional fishery management councils or NOAA Fisheries as EFH. [6] On December 19, 1997, interim final rules were published in the Federal Register (Vol. 62, No. 244) which specify procedures for implementation of the EFH provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. [7] These rules were amended by publication of final rules on January 17, 2002 (Vol. 67, No. 12). [8] he rules, in two subparts, address requirements for fishery management plan (FMP) amendment, and detail the coordination, consultation, and recommendation requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. [9]

Regulatory Text

The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, defines essential fish habitat (EFH) as “...those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity.” [10] Section 305 (b) 2-4 of the MSA describes EFH regulations and Council actions:

(2) Each Federal agency shall consult with the Secretary with respect to any action authorized, funded, or undertaken, or proposed to be authorized, funded, or undertaken, by such agency that may adversely affect any essential fish habitat identified under this Act.
(3) Each Council—
(A) may comment on and make recommendations to the Secretary and any Federal or State agency concerning any activity authorized, funded, or undertaken, or proposed to be authorized, funded, or undertaken, by any Federal or State agency that, in the view of the Council, may affect the habitat, including essential fish habitat, of a fishery resource under its authority; and
(B) shall comment on and make recommendations to the Secretary and any Federal or State agency concerning any such activity that, in the view of the Council, is likely to substantially affect the habitat, including essential fish habitat, of an anadromous fishery resource under its authority.
(4)(A) If the Secretary receives information from a Council or Federal or State agency or determines from other sources that an action authorized, funded, or undertaken, or proposed to be authorized, funded, or undertaken, by any State or Federal agency would adversely affect any essential fish habitat identified under this Act, the Secretary shall recommend to such agency measures that can be taken by such agency to conserve such habitat.
(B) Within 30 days after receiving a recommendation under subparagraph (A), a Federal agency shall provide a detailed response in writing to any Council commenting under paragraph (3) and the Secretary regarding the matter. The response shall include a description of measures proposed by the agency for avoiding, mitigating, or offsetting the impact of the activity on such habitat. In the case of a response that is inconsistent with the recommendations of the Secretary, the Federal agency shall explain its reasons for not following the recommendations.” [11]

The EFH Final Rule 50 CFR Part 600 offers specific definitions, coordination procedures, and processes to consult on actions that adversely effect EFH. [12]

Council Actions

Impacts from certain fishing practices and coastal and marine development and may alter, damage, or destroy habitats essential for fish. NOAA Fisheries, the regional fishery management councils (FMCs), and other federal agencies work together to minimize these threats. [13] Congress has created councils to classify unfavorable impacts on fishes in relation to types of fishing gear, coastal developments and nonpoint and point source pollution, as well as, evaluating how well each fishery is managed. The FMCs, with assistance from NOAA Fisheries, has delineated EFH for federally managed species. As new FMPs are developed, EFH for newly managed species will also be defined. [14] FMPs must describe and identify EFH for the fishery, minimize to the extent practicable the adverse effects of fishing on EFH, and identify other actions to encourage the conservation and enhancement of EFH. [15]

EFH Consultations

Through consultations, NOAA Fisheries can recommend ways federal agencies can avoid or minimize the adverse effects of their actions on the habitat of federally managed commercial and recreational fisheries. [16] Federal action agencies which fund, permit, or carry out activities that may adversely affect EFH are required to consult with NOAA Fisheries. [17] The federal action agency must provide NOAA Fisheries with an assessment of all actions or proposed actions authorized, funded, or undertaken by the agency that may adversely affect EFH. [18] Then NOAA Fisheries will provide the federal action agency with EFH Conservation recommendations. [19] These Conservation Recommendations provide information on how to avoid, minimize, mitigate, or offset those adverse effects. [20] Federal action agencies must provide a written explanation to NOAA Fisheries if any of these recommendations have not been adopted. [21] NOAA Fisheries must also include measures to minimize the adverse effects of fishing gear and fishing activities on EFH as well. [22] In addition, NOAA Fisheries and the FMCs may comment on and make recommendations to any state agency on their activities which may affect EFH. [23]

Most consultations are done in the NMFS regional offices: Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office (GARFO), Southeast Regional Office (SERO), West Coast Regional Office (WCRO), Alaska Regional Office (AKRO), and Pacific Islands Regional Office (PIRO). National consultations spanning multiple regions can be done at NOAA Fisheries Headquarters.

State agencies and private landowners are not required to consult with NMFS. EFH consultations are required if the federal government has authorized, funded, or undertaken part or all of a proposed activity, and if the action will adversely affect EFH. [24] Adversely affecting EFH includes direct or indirect physical, chemical or biological alterations of the waters or substrate and loss of, or injury to species and their habitat, and other ecosystem components, or reduction of the quality and/or quantity of EFH. [25]

Habitat Areas of Particular Concern

Habitat areas of particular concern or HAPCs are considered high priority areas for conservation, management, and research. [26] HAPCs are subsets of EFH that merit special attention because they meet at least one of the following 4 criteria:

  1. provide important ecological function;
  2. are sensitive to environmental degradation;
  3. include a habitat type that is/will be stressed by development;
  4. include a habitat type that is rare. [27]

Current HAPCs include important habitats like estuaries, canopy kelp, corals, seagrass, and rocky reefs, among other areas of interest. HAPCs are afforded the same regulatory protection as EFH and do not exclude activities from occurring in the area, such as fishing, diving, swimming or surfing. [28]

EFH vs. Critical Habitat

Essential Fish Habitat is designated for all federally managed fish under the MSA whereas Critical Habitat is designated for the survival and recovery of species listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). [29] Critical habitats include areas occupied by the threatened or endangered species that include physical and biological features that are essential to the conservation of the species. [30] Critical Habitat is designated as critical at the time a species is listed under the ESA. [31] EFH and Critical Habitat are different in terms of designation and regulation, but they may overlap for certain species such as salmon. [32]

Habitat Characteristics

Habitat characteristics include sediment type, type of bottoms (sand, silt and clay), structures underlying the water surface, and aquatic community structures. These habitats are essential for fish and ecosystem health. The fundamental habitat structure begins with sediment. Erosion is stabilized by submerged aquatic vegetation. There are two main types of bottoms, hard and soft. [33] A study by Christensen at el. (2004) looked at three bottom habitat types (vegetated marsh edge, submerged aquatic vegetation, and shallow non-vegetated bottom) in relation to juvenile brown shrimp ( Farfantepenaeus aztecus ). The results from the study showed that brown shrimp selected vegetated areas in salinities 15-25 ppt and they would select vegetated areas over marsh edges when they co-occurred. Finding the areas that had the highest abundance helped to identify EFH of juvenile brown shrimp. [34]

Hard bottom also known as coral reefs or live bottom provides hard complex vertical structure for attachment of sponges, seaweed, and coral, which in turn support a diverse reef fish community. [35] This community can comprise invertebra, coral, hard coral, bryozoans, polychaete worms, tunicates, a variety of fin-fishes, alga, and sponges. Areas of compacted or sheered mud and sediment are also a form of hard bottom. [36]

Soft bottom consists of unconsolidated sediment and unvegetated areas. In some regions soft bottoms are not protected even though they may be primary nursery areas, anadromous fish spawning areas, and anadromous nursery areas. Characteristics that affect soft bottom in relation to organisms that utilize them include sediment grain size, salinity, dissolved oxygen and flow. [37]

Artificial Structures

In September 2012, the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Gulf Council) solicited applications for seats on an advisory panel to review if artificial reefs, or man-made structures and substrates could be considered EFH for federally managed species. [38] The Gulf Council was concerned about the effect that the removal of structures serving as artificial reef habitat may have on reef fish fisheries in the region. [39] Artificial reefs can be inhabited by federally managed species and may provide important habitat necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding or growth to maturity. [40] In June 2013, Amendment Number 4 to Fishery Management Plans was put forth. The purpose of this action was to consider the role of artificial substrate as EFH. [41] At this point, a decision has not been made on designating artificial structures as EFH.


Related Research Articles

United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States federal government agency

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service is an agency of the United States Federal Government within the United States Department of the Interior dedicated to the management of fish, wildlife, and natural habitats. The mission of the agency is "working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people."

Atlantic wolffish Species of fish

The Atlantic wolffish, also known as the seawolf, Atlantic catfish, ocean catfish, devil fish, wolf eel, woof or sea cat, is a marine fish of the wolffish family Anarhichadidae, native to the North Atlantic Ocean. The numbers of the Atlantic wolffish in US waters are rapidly being depleted, most likely due to overfishing and bycatch, and it is currently a Species of Concern according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Marine Fisheries Service.

Nassau grouper Species of fish

The Nassau grouper is one of the large number of perciform fishes in the family Serranidae commonly referred to as groupers. It is the most important of the groupers for commercial fishery in the West Indies, but has been endangered by overfishing.

Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Sanctuary off the Pacific Coast of Southern California

The Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary is a sanctuary off the Pacific coast of Southern California. The National Marine Sanctuary program is administered by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Endangered Species Act of 1973 United States Law

The Endangered Species Act of 1973 is the primary law in the United States for protecting imperiled species. Designed to protect critically imperiled species from extinction as a "consequence of economic growth and development untempered by adequate concern and conservation", the ESA was signed into law by President Richard Nixon on December 28, 1973. The Supreme Court of the United States described it as "the most comprehensive legislation for the preservation of endangered species enacted by any nation". The purposes of the ESA are two-fold: to prevent extinction and to recover species to the point where the law's protections are not needed. It therefore "protect[s] species and the ecosystems upon which they depend" through different mechanisms. For example, section 4 requires the agencies overseeing the Act to designate imperiled species as threatened or endangered. Section 9 prohibits unlawful ‘take,’ of such species, which means to "harass, harm, hunt..." Section 7 directs federal agencies to use their authorities to help conserve listed species. The Act also serves as the enacting legislation to carry out the provisions outlined in The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). The Supreme Court found that "the plain intent of Congress in enacting" the ESA "was to halt and reverse the trend toward species extinction, whatever the cost." The Act is administered by two federal agencies, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). FWS and NMFS have been delegated by the Act with the authority to promulgate any rules and guidelines within the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to implement its provisions.

United States National Marine Sanctuary Zone in US waters designated for special protection

A U.S. National Marine Sanctuary is a zone within United States waters where the marine environment enjoys special protection. The program began in 1972 in response to public concern about the plight of marine ecosystems.

Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act

The Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA), commonly referred to as the Magnuson–Stevens Act (MSA), is the legislation providing for the management of marine fisheries in U.S. waters. Originally enacted in 1976 to assert control of foreign fisheries that were operating as close as 12 nautical miles off the U.S. coast, the legislation has since been amended, in 1996 and 2007, to better address the twin problems of overfishing and overcapacity. These ecological and economic problems arose in the domestic fishing industry as it grew to fill the vacuum left by departing foreign fishing fleets.

National Marine Fisheries Service Office of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), informally known as NOAA Fisheries, is a United States federal agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that is responsible for the stewardship of U.S. national marine resources. It conserves and manages fisheries to promote sustainability and prevent lost economic potential associated with overfishing, declining species, and degraded habitats.

Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument Protected region of ocean and islands

The Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument is a World Heritage listed U.S. National Monument encompassing 583,000 square miles (1,510,000 km2) of ocean waters, including ten islands and atolls of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Created in June 2006 with 140,000 square miles (360,000 km2), it was expanded in August 2016 by moving its border to the limit of the exclusive economic zone, making it one of the world's largest protected areas. It is internationally known for its cultural and natural values as follows:

The area has deep cosmological and traditional significance for living Native Hawaiian culture, as an ancestral environment, as an embodiment of the Hawaiian concept of kinship between people and the natural world, and as the place where it is believed that life originates and to where the spirits return after death. On two of the islands, Nihoa and Mokumanamana, there are archaeological remains relating to pre-European settlement and use. Much of the monument is made up of pelagic and deepwater habitats, with notable features such as seamounts and submerged banks, extensive coral reefs and lagoons.

Elkhorn coral Species of coral

Elkhorn coral is an important reef-building coral in the Caribbean. The species has a complex structure with many branches which resemble that of elk antlers; hence, the common name. The branching structure creates habitat and shelter for many other reef species. Elkhorn coral is known to grow quickly with an average growth rate of 5 to 10 cm per year. They can reproduce both sexually and asexually, though asexual reproduction is much more common and occurs through a process called fragmentation.

U.S. Regional Fishery Management Councils

The eight U.S. regional fishery management councils are the primary forums for developing conservation and management measures for U.S. marine fisheries. The regional councils recommend management measures for fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ); which are subject to approval and implemented by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The councils were established by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act in 1976. In 1996, revisions to the laws governing the regional fishery management councils were made by the Sustainable Fisheries Act, which includes provisions to reduce bycatch, consider the effects of management decisions on communities, and protect essential fish habitats.

Fishing industry in the United States

As with other countries, the 200 nautical miles (370 km) exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the coast of the United States gives its fishing industry special fishing rights. It covers 11.4 million square kilometres, which is the second largest zone in the world, exceeding the land area of the United States.

Southern California Steelhead DPS

The Southern California Steelhead Distinct Population Segment (DPS) occurs from the Santa Maria River to the Tijuana River at the United States and Mexican Border in seasonally accessible rivers and streams. Steelhead in the Southern California Steelhead DPS, much like its relatives further north, requires sufficient flows in their natal streams to be able to return from oceans and lakes to spawn. Due to the extended periods of drought throughout their range, Southern California steelhead are most commonly seen during periods of increased rainfall, such as El Niño events. Declared federally endangered in 1997, the geographic range of the DPS when first listed extended from the Santa Maria River south to Malibu Creek. In 2002 steelhead were discovered in San Mateo Creek on the county line of Orange and San Diego counties. With this discovery the range of the DPS was extended to include Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego counties.

Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996

The Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 is an amendment to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, a law governing the management of marine fisheries in the United States. Another major amendment to this legislation was later made under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006. The SFA was enacted to amend the outdated MSFCMA of 1976. The amendment included changes to the purpose of the act, definitions, and international affairs, as well as many small changes.

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC) is one of eight regional councils established by the Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act in 1976 to manage the fisheries of the United States. With jurisdiction over the 900,000-square-mile (2,300,000 km2) Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off Alaska, the Council has primary responsibility for groundfish management in the Gulf of Alaska, Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, including cod, pollock, flatfish, mackerel, sablefish, and rockfish species. Other large Alaska fisheries such as salmon, crab and herring are managed primarily by the State of Alaska.

Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council

The Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council (WPRFMC) is one of eight regional councils established under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) in 1976 to manage offshore fisheries. The WPRFMC's jurisdiction includes the US exclusive economic zone (EEZ) waters around the State of Hawaii; US Territories of American Samoa and Guam; the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI); and the US Pacific remote island areas of Johnston, Midway, Palmyra and Wake Atolls; Baker, Howland and Jarvis Islands; and Kingman Reef. This area of nearly 1.5 million square miles is the size of the continental United States and constitutes about half of the entire US EEZ. It spans both sides of the equator and both sides of the dateline. The WPRFMC also manages domestic fisheries based in the US Pacific Islands that operate on the high seas.

Loggerhead sea turtle policies of the Barack Obama administration (2009–2017)

The loggerhead sea turtle, is protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. It was originally listed as a threatened species on July 28, 1978. The turtle's status was updated to Vulnerable (VU) on August 23, 2018. The loggerhead turtle is the most prolific species of sea turtle in U.S. coastal waters.

Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; National Standard Guidelines

The Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions is necessary to help compliance the requirements of the MSA to end and prevent overfishing, rebuild overfished stocks, and achieve maximum yield

Marine policy of the Barack Obama administration

The Marine Policy of the Barack Obama administration comprises several significant environmental policy decisions for the oceans made during his two terms in office from 2009 to 2017. By executive action, President Obama increased fourfold the amount of protected marine space in waters under United States control, setting an important precedent for global ocean conservation. Using the U.S. president's authority under the Antiquities Act of 1906, he expanded to 200 nautical miles the seaward limits of Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument in Hawaiʻi and the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument around the U.S. island possessions in the Central Pacific. In the Atlantic, President Obama created the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument, the first marine monument in the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the Atlantic.

Coral Reef Conservation Program

Coral Reef Conservation Program (CRCP) is a partnership between National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) agencies, established in 2000. The program is a multidisciplinary approach, initiated by the NOAA, to managing and understanding coral reef ecosystems through research and the publication of data to support relevant partners involved in coral reef restoration.

References

  1. ↑ 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1884
  2. ↑ Rosenberg, A., T. E. Bigford, S. Leathery, R. L. Hill, and K. Bickers. 2000. Ecosystem approaches to fishery management through essential fish habitat. Bulletin of marine science 66(3):535-542.
  3. ↑ NOAA Habitat Conservation. Habitat Protection. “What is Essential Fish Habitat?” http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/index.html
  4. ↑ Essential Fish Habitat: A Marine Fish Habitat Conservation Mandate for Federal Agencies.” National Marine Fisheries Service. South Atlantic Region. http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat_conservation/documents/pdfs/efh/sa_guide_2010.pdf 9 September 2010. Web 28 August 2014.
  5. ↑ “Essential Fish Habitat and Consultation.” NOAA Fisheries. Pacific Islands Regional Office. http://www.fpir.noaa.gov/Library/HCD/EFH_and_Consultation_factsheet_FINAL_05-08-2013_lo.pdf 8 May 2013. Web 3 September 2014.
  6. ↑ “What is an Essential Fish Habitat Consultation?” Habitat Conservation- Southeast Region. http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat_conservation/documents/pdfs/efh/efh_consultation_101_ver082013.pdf August 2013. Web. 3 September 2014.
  7. ↑ “Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Essential Fish Habitat (EFH); Interim final rule; request for comments,” 62 Federal Register 244 (19 December 1997), pp. 66531 - 66559.
  8. ↑ “Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Essential Fish Habitat (EFH); Final rule” 67 Federal Register 12 (17 January 2002), pp. 2343 - 2383.
  9. ↑ Essential Fish Habitat: A Marine Fish Habitat Conservation Mandate for Federal Agencies.” National Marine Fisheries Service. South Atlantic Region. http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat_conservation/documents/pdfs/efh/sa_guide_2010.pdf 9 September 2010. Web 28 August 2014.
  10. ↑ 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1884
  11. ↑ 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1884
  12. ↑ “Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Essential Fish Habitat (EFH); Final rule” 67 Federal Register 12 (17 January 2002), pp. 2343 - 2383.
  13. ↑ Essential Fish Habitat: A Marine Fish Habitat Conservation Mandate for Federal Agencies.” National Marine Fisheries Service. South Atlantic Region. http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat_conservation/documents/pdfs/efh/sa_guide_2010.pdf 9 September 2010. Web 28 August 2014.
  14. ↑ Essential Fish Habitat: A Marine Fish Habitat Conservation Mandate for Federal Agencies.” National Marine Fisheries Service. South Atlantic Region. http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat_conservation/documents/pdfs/efh/sa_guide_2010.pdf 9 September 2010. Web 28 August 2014.
  15. ↑ “About Essential Fish Habitat” NOAA Fisheries. Alaska Regional Office. http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/habitat/efh.htm Web. 3 September 2014.
  16. ↑ NOAA Habitat Conservation. Habitat Protection. “Protecting Essential Fish Habitat.” http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/howweprotect.html 3 September 2014.
  17. ↑ NOAA Habitat Conservation. Habitat Protection. “Essential Fish Habitat Consultations” http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/consultations.html 3 September 2014.
  18. ↑ “EFH Highlights”. NOAA Fisheries Service Habitat Conservation Division. http://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/hcd/ Web. 3 September 2014.
  19. ↑ NOAA Habitat Conservation. Habitat Protection. “Essential Fish Habitat Consultations” http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/consultations.html 3 September 2014.
  20. ↑ NOAA Habitat Conservation. Habitat Protection. “Essential Fish Habitat Consultations” http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/consultations.html 3 September 2014.
  21. ↑ NOAA Habitat Conservation. Habitat Protection. “Essential Fish Habitat Consultations” http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/consultations.html 3 September 2014.
  22. ↑ NOAA Habitat Conservation. Habitat Protection. “Essential Fish Habitat Consultations” http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/consultations.html 3 September 2014.
  23. ↑ Essential Fish Habitat: A Marine Fish Habitat Conservation Mandate for Federal Agencies.” National Marine Fisheries Service. South Atlantic Region. http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat_conservation/documents/pdfs/efh/sa_guide_2010.pdf 9 September 2010. Web. 28 August 2014.
  24. ↑ NOAA Habitat Conservation. Habitat Protection. “Essential Fish Habitat Consultations” http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/consultations.html 3 September 2014.
  25. ↑ NOAA Habitat Conservation. Habitat Protection. “Essential Fish Habitat Consultations” http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/consultations.html 3 September 2014.
  26. ↑ Essential Fish Habitat: A Marine Fish Habitat Conservation Mandate for Federal Agencies.” National Marine Fisheries Service. South Atlantic Region. http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat_conservation/documents/pdfs/efh/sa_guide_2010.pdf 9 September 2010. Web. 28 August 2014.
  27. ↑ “Essential Fish Habitat and Consultation.” NOAA Fisheries. Pacific Islands Regional Office. http://www.fpir.noaa.gov/Library/HCD/EFH_and_Consultation_factsheet_FINAL_05-08-2013_lo.pdf 8 May 2013. Web. 3 September 2014.
  28. ↑ “Essential Fish Habitat and Consultation.” NOAA Fisheries. Pacific Islands Regional Office. http://www.fpir.noaa.gov/Library/HCD/EFH_and_Consultation_factsheet_FINAL_05-08-2013_lo.pdf 8 May 2013. Web. 3 September 2014.
  29. ↑ “Essential Fish Habitat and Critical Habitat: A comparison”. NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service. http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/habitat/essential_fish_habitat/comparison_of_efh___critical_habitat.pdf Web. 4 September 2014.
  30. ↑ “Essential Fish Habitat and Critical Habitat: A comparison”. NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service. http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/habitat/essential_fish_habitat/comparison_of_efh___critical_habitat.pdf Web. 4 September 2014.
  31. ↑ “Essential Fish Habitat and Critical Habitat: A comparison”. NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service. http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/habitat/essential_fish_habitat/comparison_of_efh___critical_habitat.pdf Web. 4 September 2014.
  32. ↑ “Essential Fish Habitat and Critical Habitat: A comparison”. NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service. http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/habitat/essential_fish_habitat/comparison_of_efh___critical_habitat.pdf Web. 4 September 2014.
  33. ↑ DeLong, A. K., J. S. Collie, R. I. S. Grant, and N. S. G. C. Program. 2004. Defining essential fish habitat: a model-based approach. Citeseer
  34. ↑ Clark, R., and coauthors. 2004. A habitat-use model to determine essential fish habitat for juvenile brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) in Galveston Bay, Texas. Fishery Bulletin-National Oceranic and Atmospheric Administration. 102:264-277
  35. ↑ "Ocean HardBottom NCDENR http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/mf/69. Web. 22 September 2014.
  36. ↑ Peterson, C. H., and coauthors. 2000. Synthesis of linkages between benthic and fish communities as a key to protecting essential fish habitat. Bulletin of marine science 66(3):759-774.
  37. ↑ Street, M. W. 2005. North Carolina coastal habitat protection plan. NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries.
  38. ↑ “Gulf Council Seeks Members for Ad Hoc Artificial Substrate Advisory Panel” Gulf Of Mexico Fishery Management Council. Public Notice. http://www.gulfcouncil.org/news_resources/Press%20Releases/Ad%20Hoc%20Artificial%20Substrate%20AP%2009-12.pdf 6 September 2012. Web. 4 September 2014.
  39. ↑ “Fixed Petroleum Platforms and Artificial Reefs as Essential Fish Habitat”. Options Paper Generic Amendment Number 4 to Fishery Management Plans in the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf Of Mexico Fishery Management Council. June 2013.
  40. ↑ “Fixed Petroleum Platforms and Artificial Reefs as Essential Fish Habitat”. Options Paper Generic Amendment Number 4 to Fishery Management Plans in the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf Of Mexico Fishery Management Council. June 2013.
  41. ↑ “Fixed Petroleum Platforms and Artificial Reefs as Essential Fish Habitat”. Options Paper Generic Amendment Number 4 to Fishery Management Plans in the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. June 2013.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.