Eugenics in Mexico

Last updated

Following the Mexican Revolution, the eugenics movement gained prominence in Mexico. Seeking to change the genetic make-up of the country's population, proponents of eugenics in Mexico focused primarily on rebuilding the population, creating healthy citizens, and ameliorating the effects of perceived social ills such as alcoholism, prostitution, and venereal diseases. Mexican eugenics, at its height in the 1930s, influenced the state's health, education, and welfare policies. [1]

Contents

Global context

During the early twentieth century, eugenics became a popular method for population control and nation-building in many countries in Europe and the Americas. Its proponents sought to "improve" the human race through both positive and negative eugenic practices. Positive eugenics encouraged the procreation of the "fit," and negative eugenics advocated for the implementation of more radical actions such as marriage restriction and sterilization of the "unfit." [2] The eugenics movement was not confined to Western European countries and the US. By the 1930s, almost every country in Latin America had been impacted by eugenics. [3]

Neo-Lamarckian eugenics

Unlike in other countries, the eugenics movements in Latin America were largely founded on the idea of Neo-Lamarckian eugenics. [4] Neo-Lamarckian eugenics stated that the outside effects experienced by an organism throughout its lifetime changed its genetics permanently, allowing the organism to pass acquired traits onto its offspring. [5] In the Neo-Lamarckian genetic framework, activities such as prostitution and alcoholism could result in the degeneration of future generations, amplifying fears about the effects of certain social ills. However, the supposed genetic malleability also offered hope to certain Latin American eugenicists, as social reform would have the ability to transform the population more permanently. [4]

Policy

According to scholars, eugenics in Mexico was largely preventative and focused on marriage restriction and sexual education. Leaders wanted to encourage the procreation of the "fit." The eugenics movement arrived in Mexico in the context of the widespread devastation and violence of the Mexican Revolution, [6] which had resulted in a pronounced decline in population as well as a growing nationalist sentiment. After almost a decade of brutal fighting, the country was seeking to rebuild not only its population but also its national identity. [7] Prostitution, alcoholism, and venereal disease were all perceived as threats to the fitness of the Mexican population. Many eugenicists sought to eliminate such social ills through control of reproduction, child-rearing, and hygiene.

Law of Familial Relations

Some of the origins of the eugenics movement can be seen in the 1917 Law of Familial Relations. While not passed at the height of the eugenics movement, the law was written with the intention of implementing population control and marriage restriction. According to the law, a man and a woman entering into marriage should have the legal aptitude to marry. [8] Disabled people and those with venereal and other diseases that were perceived to be hereditary were barred from marriage so that they can not procreate and damage the family unit and the interests of the species. [8] Among other things, the law legalized divorce, on the justification that individuals should be allowed to separate from partners legally who might not be "fit" enough to reproduce.

Sex education

A key component of Mexican eugenics was education. Pieces of the revolutionary constitution focused on public education, which was meant to be available to everyone, regardless of social standing. [9] In addition to the push for access to public education, the federal government attempted to bring sex education into schools. [9] State efforts for education were connected to the eugenic agenda.

Those who were in positions of power in the Department of Public Healthy and the Ministry of Public Education were the same people who attended the First Mexican Congress of the Child, a conference on the application of eugenics to family building. [10]

It was thought that sex education could prevent the degeneration of the race by eliminating certain social problems, such as syphilis, tuberculosis, and alcoholism. [10] In the 1930s, a committee appointed by the Secretary of Public Education issued a report on the necessity of sex education in Mexico. The committee argued that sex education was an absolute necessity for healthy and normal development. The report concluded that a lack of sex education was the primary cause of negative personal habits and was responsible for the supposed decline of society. [11]

The committee, under the Secretary of Public Education, put forth a set of recommendations to implement sex education programs in schools. The proposal for this type of educational program came with several stipulations, many of which echoed eugenic ideas. Pupils in elementary schools were to be classified according to their sex and capacities. Those who were deemed incapable should be moved to separate schools for physically, mentally, and morally abnormal students. [11]

It would be the Department of Hygiene that had the ultimate authority of reclassification and reorganization of the abnormal. The committee's outline for sex education ended by stating that family health was the basis of the nation's "happiness" and "progress." [11] Again, sex education and eugenic principles were often so closely linked. Many Mexican eugenicists sought to establish "educational norms." [10]

Motherhood

The eugenics movement in Mexico had an intense focus on the role of the mother in cultivating a "fit" child. It was thought that there was an "inherent"' connection between mother and child that, if cultivated properly, would ensure the future of the nation. [6] Puericulture, an idea focused on the role that mothers played in ensuring the "proper" hygiene of the child, shaped eugenic reforms in Mexico. [10]

By the late 1920s and the early 1920s, multiple organizations and societies had been created to focus on the role of eugenics in caring for a child. The First Mexican Congress of the Child was held in 1921. Issues that were eugenic and sexual in nature were brought to the attention of the attendees, such as maternal health and the sterilization of criminals. [12] [6] In 1929, the Mexican Society of Puericulture (Sociedad Mexicana de Puericultura) emerged as another society influenced by eugenics. By then, the Society of Puericulture had created a branch dedicated to eugenics and addressed sex education, infantile sexuality, and disease in relation to caring for a child. [13] The government was also preoccupied with the importance of puericulture. The Public Health Department's School Hygiene Service offered childcare education classes for women, went into poor communities to educate new mothers about infant hygiene, and built playgrounds. [12]

Sterilization

In December 1932, the state of Veracruz passed the only eugenic sterilization law that has ever existed in Latin America. Proponents of the law advocated for it because sterilization was supposedly in the interest of the species, race, and home. [14]

When Adalberto Tejeda returned to the Veracruz governorship in 1928, eugenics was integrated into his policy. He believed that prostitution, religious institutions, and alcoholism prevented the formation of fit national citizens. [14] In 1930, he attempted to eliminate prostitution with Law 362, which sanctioned the state to "locate and treat" Veracruz citizens who have been diagnosed with venereal diseases. [14] In Jalapa, women were rounded up, imprisoned, and then forcibly treated for venereal disease as part of a eugenic effort to eliminate prostitution and its "negative" health effects.

Two years later, Tejeda built upon the attempt at eugenic population control and treatment with the passage of two laws. Law 121 founded the Section of Eugenics and Mental Hygiene in the public health department, responsible for studying the "physical diseases and defects of the human organism" that were naturally passed from parent to child. In addition, prostitutes, criminals, alcoholics, and other so-called degenerates were to be subject to statistical surveys and clinical examinations. Those who were deemed to be threatening to society were to be monitored. [14]

Six months after the passage of Law 121, an addendum was passed that legalized sterilization of "the insane, idiots, degenerates, or those demented to such a degree that their defect is considered incurable or hereditarily transmissible." [14] With the help of medical professionals, the Section of Eugenics and Mental Health was in charge of identifying people who needed to be sterilized. While the law passed, it is not clear whether or not individuals were actually sterilized because of the lack of clarity in medical and historical records. [14]

Argument against Indigenismo

State-directed policies to improve the situation of Mexico's indigenous peoples and the ideology of Indigenismo in Mexico were generally opposed by urban intellectuals. With the founding of the Mexican Eugenics Society for the Improvement of the Race in 1931, arguments against indigenismo employed arguments framed by eugenics. A 1936 editorial in the Mexico City newspaper, Excelsior told readers "The Indians, with rare exceptions, are proof that the theory of environment cannot be sustained by scientific criteria.... The Mendelian theory of inheritance serves as a basis for vigorously opposing the humanitarian work of the Government. The norms of the contemporary Indians have been passed from parents to their children as a sacred trust, and it is no simple task to remove these obstacles." [15]

Legacy

Although the eugenics movement was at its most influential in the early twentieth century, some eugenic ideas continued to be present in Mexico throughout the 20 century. In the 1950s, the Public Health Department provided its employees with a genetic counseling service. Also, the acceptance of neo-Lamarckian genetics continued for Mexican eugenicists into the 1970s. [12] The 21st century has also seen strains of the early eugenics movement. Fourteen indigenous women in Guerrero were forcibly sterilized in 2001, and there have been similar accusations of the state's sterilization abuses against indigenous women in Hidalgo. The United Nations has brought such abuses to the international stage and denounced Mexico's actions.

In 2011, the Mexican government took steps to prevent sterilization abuse by introducing a legal measure to make the practice punishable with prison time. [12]

See also

Further reading

Related Research Articles

Eugenics is a fringe set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population. Historically, eugenicists have attempted to alter human gene pools by excluding people and groups judged to be inferior or promoting those judged to be superior. In recent years, the term has seen a revival in bioethical discussions on the usage of new technologies such as CRISPR and genetic screening, with a heated debate on whether these technologies should be called eugenics or not.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Racial hygiene</span> Efforts to avoid miscegenation, analogous to an animal breeder seeking purebred animals

The term racial hygiene was used to describe an approach to eugenics in the early 20th century, which found its most extensive implementation in Nazi Germany. It was marked by efforts to avoid miscegenation, analogous to an animal breeder seeking purebred animals. This was often motivated by the belief in the existence of a racial hierarchy and the related fear that "lower races" would "contaminate" a "higher" one. As with most eugenicists at the time, racial hygienists believed that the lack of eugenics would lead to rapid social degeneration, the decline of civilization by the spread of inferior characteristics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social hygiene movement</span>

The social hygiene movement was an attempt by Progressive era reformers to control venereal disease, regulate prostitution and vice, and disseminate sexual education through the use of scientific research methods and modern media techniques. Social hygiene as a profession grew alongside social work and other public health movements of the era. Social hygienists emphasized sexual continence and strict self-discipline as a solution to societal ills, tracing prostitution, drug use and illegitimacy to rapid urbanization. The movement remained alive throughout much of the 20th century and found its way into American schools, where it was transmitted in the form of classroom films about menstruation, sexually transmitted disease, drug abuse and acceptable sexual behavior in addition to an array of pamphlets, posters, textbooks and films.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Popenoe</span>

Paul Bowman Popenoe was an American agricultural explorer and eugenicist. He was an influential advocate of the compulsory sterilization of mentally ill people and people with mental disabilities, and the father of marriage counseling in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry H. Laughlin</span> American eugenicist (1880–1943)

Harry Hamilton Laughlin was an American educator and eugenicist. He served as the superintendent of the Eugenics Record Office from its inception in 1910 to its closure in 1939, and was among the most active individuals influencing American eugenics policy, especially compulsory sterilization legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Goethe</span> U.S. Eugenicist

Charles Matthias Goethe was an American eugenicist, entrepreneur, land developer, philanthropist, conservationist, founder of the Eugenics Society of Northern California, and a native and lifelong resident of Sacramento, California.

Eugenics has influenced political, public health and social movements in Japan since the late 19th and early 20th century. Originally brought to Japan through the United States, through Mendelian inheritance by way of German influences, and French Lamarckian eugenic written studies of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Eugenics as a science was hotly debated at the beginning of the 20th, in Jinsei-Der Mensch, the first eugenics journal in the Empire. As the Japanese sought to close ranks with the West, this practice was adopted wholesale, along with colonialism and its justifications.

In 1928, the Legislative Assembly of Alberta, Canada, enacted the Sexual Sterilization Act. The Act, drafted to protect the gene pool, allowed for sterilization of mentally disabled people in order to prevent the transmission of traits to offspring deemed undesirable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nazi eugenics</span> Nazi German policy of the murder of "undesirable" persons from the German people

Nazi eugenics refers to the social policies of eugenics in Nazi Germany, composed of various pseudoscientific ideas about genetics. The racial ideology of Nazism placed the biological improvement of the German people by selective breeding of "Nordic" or "Aryan" traits at its center. These policies were used to justify the involuntary sterilization and mass-murder of those deemed "undesirable".

Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring or "Sterilisation Law" was a statute in Nazi Germany enacted on July 14, 1933, which allowed the compulsory sterilisation of any citizen who in the opinion of a "Genetic Health Court" suffered from a list of alleged genetic disorders – many of which were not, in fact, genetic. The elaborate interpretive commentary on the law was written by three dominant figures in the racial hygiene movement: Ernst Rüdin, Arthur Gütt and the lawyer Falk Ruttke.

Compulsory sterilization in Canada has a documented history in the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia. In 2017, sixty indigenous women in Saskatchewan sued the provincial government, claiming they had been forced to accept sterilization before seeing their newborn babies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hereditary Health Court</span>

The Hereditary Health Court, also known as the Genetic Health Court, was a court that decided whether people should be forcibly sterilized in Nazi Germany. That method of using courts to make decisions on hereditary health in Nazi Germany was created to implement the Nazi race policy aiming for racial hygiene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eugenics in the United States</span>

Eugenics, the set of beliefs and practices which aims at improving the genetic quality of the human population, played a significant role in the history and culture of the United States from the late 19th century into the mid-20th century. The cause became increasingly promoted by intellectuals of the Progressive Era.

The International Federation of Eugenic Organizations (IFEO) was an international organization of groups and individuals focused on eugenics. Founded in London in 1912, where it was originally titled the Permanent International Eugenics Committee, it was an outgrowth of the first International Eugenics Congress. In 1925, it was retitled. Factionalism within the organization led to its division in 1933, as splinter group the Latin International Federation of Eugenics Organizations was created to give a home to eugenicists who disliked the concepts of negative eugenics, in which unfit groups and individuals are discouraged or prevented from reproducing. As the views of the Nazi party in Germany caused increasing tension within the group and leadership activity declined, it dissolved in the latter half of the 1930s.

Geza von Hoffmann (1885–1921) was a prominent Austrian-Hungarian eugenicist and writer. He lived for a time in California as the Austrian Vice-Consulate where he observed and wrote on eugenics practices in the United States.

The history of eugenics is the study of development and advocacy of ideas related to eugenics around the world. Early eugenic ideas were discussed in Ancient Greece and Rome. The height of the modern eugenics movement came in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Institutions for Defective Delinquents (IDDs) were created in the United States as a result of the eugenic criminology movement. The practices in these IDDs contain many traces of the eugenics that were first proposed by Sir Francis Galton in the late 1800s. Galton believed that "our understanding of the laws of heredity [could be used] to improve the stock of humankind." Galton eventually expanded on these ideas to suggest that individuals deemed inferior, those in prisons or asylums and those with hereditary diseases, would be discouraged from having children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sybil Neville-Rolfe</span> Founder of the Eugenics Society (1885–1955)

Sybil Neville-Rolfe OBE was a social hygienist and founder of the Eugenics Society, and a leading figure in the National Council for Combating Venereal Diseases. She has been described as a feminist and a eugenicist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eugenic feminism</span> Areas of the womens suffrage movement which overlapped with eugenics

Eugenic feminism was a component of the women's suffrage movement which overlapped with eugenics. Originally coined by the eugenicist Caleb Saleeby, the term has since been applied to summarize views held by some prominent feminists of the United States. Some early suffragettes in Canada, particularly a group known as The Famous Five, also pushed for eugenic policies, chiefly in Alberta and British Columbia.

The Race Betterment Foundation was a eugenics and racial hygiene organization founded in 1914 at Battle Creek, Michigan by John Harvey Kellogg due to his concerns about what he perceived as "race degeneracy". The foundation supported conferences, publications, and the formation of a eugenics registry in cooperation with the ERO. The foundation also sponsored the Fitter Families Campaign from 1928 to the late 1930s and funded Battle Creek College. The foundation controlled the Battle Creek Food Company, which in turn served as the major source for Kellogg's eugenics programs, conferences, and Battle Creek College. In his will, Kellogg left his entire estate to the foundation. In 1947, the foundation had over $687,000 in assets. By 1967, the foundation's accounts were a mere $492.87. In 1967, the state of Michigan indicted the trustees for squandering the foundation's funds and the foundation closed.

References

  1. ↑ Manrique, Linnete (2016). "Dreaming of a cosmic race: José Vasconcelos and the politics of race in Mexico, 1920s–1930s". Cogent Arts & Humanities. 3 (1). doi: 10.1080/23311983.2016.1218316 .
  2. ↑ Daniels, Rodney J. (2005). "Review of War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race by Edwin Black". Perspective in History. 20.
  3. ↑ Stepan, Nancy Leys (1991). The Hour of Eugenics: Race, Gender, and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. p. 55.
  4. 1 2 Stepan, Nancy Leys (1991). The Hour of Eugenics: Race, Gender, and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. pp. 64–101.
  5. ↑ Stepan, Nancy Leys (1991). The Hour of Eugenics: Race, Gender, and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. p. 25.
  6. 1 2 3 Stepan, Nancy Leys (1991). The Hour of Eugenics: Race, Gender, and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. p. 56.
  7. ↑ Schell, P. "Mexico". Eugenics Archive.
  8. 1 2 Ley sobre relaciones familiares (Mexico 1917)
  9. 1 2 Rubenstein, Anne (1998). "Raised Voices in the Cine Montecarlo: Sex Education, Mass Media, and Oppositional Politics in Mexico". Journal of Family History. 23 (3): 312–323. doi:10.1177/036319909802300306. S2CID   143834022.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Stern, Alexandra Minna (1999). "Responsible Mothers and Normal Children: Eugenics, Nationalism, and Welfare in Post-revolutionary Mexico, 1920–1940". Journal of Historical Sociology. 12 (4): 369–397. doi:10.1111/1467-6443.00097. PMID   21987856.
  11. 1 2 3 Ebaugh, C.D. (1936). "Mexico Studies Sex Education". Social Forces. 15 (1): 81–83. doi:10.2307/2570472. JSTOR   2570472.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Schell, Patience A. "Mexico". Eugenics Archive. Retrieved April 22, 2017.
  13. ↑ Stepan, Nancy Ley (1991). The Hour of Eugenics: Race, Gender, and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. p. 57.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stern, Alexandra Minna (2011). ""The Hour of Eugenics" in Veracruz, Mexico: Radical Politics, Public Health, and Latin America's Only Sterilization Law". Hispanic American Historical Review. 91 (3): 431–443. doi:10.1215/00182168-1300191.
  15. ↑ "El problema indígena en el pais," Excelsior 28 September 1936 quoted in Alexander S. Dawson, Indian and Nation in Revolutionary Mexico. Tucson: University of Arizona Press 2004, pp. 146–147.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.