Exception that proves the rule

Last updated

"The exception that proves the rule" is a saying whose meaning is contested. Henry Watson Fowler's Modern English Usage identifies five ways in which the phrase has been used, [1] and each use makes some sort of reference to the role that a particular case or event takes in relation to a more general rule.

Contents

Two original meanings of the phrase are usually cited. The first, preferred by Fowler, is that the presence of an exception applying to a specific case establishes ("proves") that a general rule exists. A more explicit phrasing might be "the exception that proves the existence of the rule". [1] Most contemporary uses of the phrase emerge from this origin, [2] although often in a way which is closer to the idea that all rules have their exceptions. [1] The alternative origin given is that the word "prove" is used in the archaic sense of "test", [3] a reading advocated, for example, by a 1918 Detroit News style guide:

The exception proves the rule is a phrase that arises from ignorance, though common to good writers. The original word was preuves, which did not mean proves but tests. [4]

In this sense, the phrase does not mean that an exception demonstrates a rule to be true or to exist, but that it tests the rule, thereby proving its value. There is little evidence of the phrase being used in this second way. [1] [2] [5]

Uses in English

Fowler's typology of uses stretches from what he sees as the "original, simple use" through to the use which is both the "most objectionable" and "unfortunately the commonest". [1] Fowler, following a prescriptive approach, [6] understood this typology as moving from a more correct to a less correct use. [1] However under a more descriptive approach, such distinctions in terms of accuracy would be less useful. [6]

Proving the existence of the rule

A Controlled Parking Zone sign used in the United Kingdom, prohibiting parking during certain times. If a driver is unsure about whether parking is allowed in a certain location, such a sign helps demonstrate the existence of a general rule that parking is allowed outside the times listed. UK traffic sign 663.svg
A Controlled Parking Zone sign used in the United Kingdom, prohibiting parking during certain times. If a driver is unsure about whether parking is allowed in a certain location, such a sign helps demonstrate the existence of a general rule that parking is allowed outside the times listed.

This meaning of the phrase, which for Fowler is the original and clearest meaning, [1] is thought to have emerged from the legal phrase "exceptio probat regulam in casibus non exceptis", [7] an argument attributed to Cicero in his defence of Lucius Cornelius Balbus. [8] [9] This argument states if an exception exists or has to be stated, then this exception proves that there must be some rule to which the case is an exception. [8] The second part of Cicero's phrase, "in casibus non exceptis" or "in cases not excepted," is almost always missing from modern uses of the statement that "the exception proves the rule".

Consider the following example of the original meaning:

Special leave is given for men to be out of barracks tonight till 11.00 p.m.; "The exception proves the rule" means that this special leave implies a rule requiring men, except when an exception is made, to be in earlier. The value of this in interpreting statutes is plain.

— Fowler [1]

In other words, under this meaning of the phrase, the exception proves that the rule exists on other occasions. [2] This meaning of the phrase, outside of a legal setting, can describe inferences taken from signs, statements or other information. For example, the inference in a shop from a sign saying "pre-paid delivery required for refrigerators" would be that pre-paid delivery is not required for other objects. [2] In this case, the exception of refrigerators proves the existence of a rule that pre-paid delivery is not required.

The English phrase was used this way in early citations from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. [10] [11]

Proving the validity of a rule of thumb

"The exception that proves the rule" is often used to describe a case (the exception) which serves to highlight or confirm (prove) a rule to which the exception itself is apparently contrary. Fowler describes two versions of this use, one being the "loose rhetorical sense" and the other "serious nonsense"; [1] other writers connect these uses together insofar as they represent what Holton calls a "drift" from the legal meaning. [5] In its more rhetorical sense, this variant of the phrase describes an exception which reveals a tendency that might have otherwise gone unnoticed. [1] In other words, the presence of the exception serves to remind and perhaps reveal to us the rule that otherwise applies; the word 'proof' here is thus not to be taken literally.

In many uses of the phrase, however, the existence of an exception is taken to more definitively 'prove' a rule to which the exception does not fit. Under this sense it is "the unusualness of the exception" [2] which proves how prevalent the tendency or rule of thumb to which it runs contrary is. For example: a rural village is "always" quiet. A local farmer rents his fields to a rock festival, which disturbs the quiet. In this example, saying "the exception proves the rule" is in a literal sense incorrect, as the exception shows (first) that the belief is not a rule and (second) there is no 'proof' involved. However, the phrase draws attention to the rarity of the exception, and in so doing establishes the general accuracy of the rule. In what Fowler describes as the "most objectionable" variation of the phrase, [1] this sort of use comes closest to meaning "there is an exception to every rule", or even that the presence of an exception makes a rule more true; these uses Fowler attributes to misunderstanding. [1]

The Oxford English Dictionary includes this meaning in its entry for the word exception, citing the example from Benjamin Jowett's 1855 book Essays, in which he writes: "We may except one solitary instance (an exception which eminently proves the rule)." Here, the existence of an exception seems to strengthen the belief of the prevalence of the rule. [7]

Scientific sense

Under this version of the phrase, the word 'proof' is to be understood in its archaic form to mean the word 'test' (this use can be seen in the phrase the proof of the pudding is in the eating [12] ). Fowler's example is of a hypothetical critic, Jones, who never writes a favourable review. So it is surprising when we receive an exception: a favourable review by Jones of a novel by an unknown author. Then it is discovered that the novel is his own, written under a pseudonym. The exception tested ('proved') the rule and found that it needed to be understood a little more precisely - namely, that Jones will never write a favourable review, except of his own work. [1] The previous evaluation of Jones's ill-nature toward others is re-affirmed by discovering the manner in which the exception falls outside the rule.

Holton argues that this origin involves a "once-heard etymology" which "makes no sense of the way in which the expression is used". [5] Others agree that most uses of the term do not correspond to this format. [2] Nonetheless, it does for Fowler pass the test of making grammatical sense [1] and it is also referenced as a possible meaning within the Oxford English Dictionary. [7]

In any case, the phrase can be interpreted as a jocular expression of the correct insight that a single counterexample, while sufficient to disprove a strictly logical statement, does not disprove statistical statements which may correctly express a general trend notwithstanding the also commonly encountered existence of a few outliers to this trend.

Humorous use

Fowler describes this use as "jocular nonsense". He presents the exchange: 'If there is one virtue I can claim, it is punctuality.' 'Were you in time for breakfast this morning?' 'Well, well, the exception that proves the rule.' [1] In this case, the speakers are aware that the phrase does not correctly apply, but are appealing to it ironically.

See also

Related Research Articles

An abbreviation is a shortened form of a word or phrase, by any method. It may consist of a group of letters or words taken from the full version of the word or phrase; for example, the word abbreviation can itself be represented by the abbreviation abbr., abbrv., or abbrev.; NPO, for nil per (by) os (mouth) is an abbreviated medical instruction. It may also consist of initials only, a mixture of initials and words, or words or letters representing words in another language. Some types of abbreviations are acronyms or grammatical contractions or crasis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparison of American and British English</span> Linguistic comparison

The English language was introduced to the Americas by British colonisation, beginning in the late 16th and early 17th centuries. The language also spread to numerous other parts of the world as a result of British trade and colonisation and the spread of the former British Empire, which, by 1921, included 470–570 million people, about a quarter of the world's population. Written forms of British and American English as found in newspapers and textbooks vary little in their essential features, with only occasional noticeable differences.

In linguistics, the grammar of a natural language is its set of structural rules on speakers' or writers' usage and creation of clauses, phrases, and words. The term can also refer to the study of such rules, a subject that includes phonology, morphology, and syntax, together with phonetics, semantics, and pragmatics. There are two different ways to study grammar right now: traditional grammar and theoretical grammar.

A split infinitive is a grammatical construction in which an adverb or adverbial phrase separates the "to" and "infinitive" constituents of what was traditionally called the full infinitive, but is more commonly known in modern linguistics as the to-infinitive. In the history of English language aesthetics, the split infinitive was often deprecated, despite its prevalence in colloquial speech. The opening sequence of the Star Trek television series contains a well-known example, "to boldly go where no man has gone before", wherein the adverb boldly was said to split the full infinitive, to go. Multiple words may split a to-infinitive, such as: "The population is expected to more than double in the next ten years."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theorem</span> In mathematics, a statement that has been proved

In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proved, or can be proved. The proof of a theorem is a logical argument that uses the inference rules of a deductive system to establish that the theorem is a logical consequence of the axioms and previously proved theorems.

In classical rhetoric and logic, begging the question or assuming the conclusion is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion. A question-begging inference is valid, in the sense that the conclusion is as true as the premise, but it is not a valid argument.

English grammar is the set of structural rules of the English language. This includes the structure of words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and whole texts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English plurals</span> How English plurals are formed; typically -(e)s

English nouns are inflected for grammatical number, meaning that, if they are of the countable type, they generally have different forms for singular and plural. This article discusses the variety of ways in which English plural nouns are formed from the corresponding singular forms, as well as various issues concerning the usage of singulars and plurals in English. For plurals of pronouns, see English personal pronouns.

In grammar, a conjunction is a part of speech that connects words, phrases, or clauses that are called the conjuncts of the conjunctions. That definition may overlap with that of other parts of speech, and so what constitutes a "conjunction" must be defined for each language. In English, a given word may have several senses, and be either a preposition or a conjunction depending on the syntax of the sentence. For example, after is a preposition in "he left after the fight" but is a conjunction in "he left after they fought". In general, a conjunction is an invariable (non-inflected) grammatical particle that may or may not stand between the items conjoined.

Pleonasm is redundancy in linguistic expression, such as "black darkness" or "burning fire". It is a manifestation of tautology by traditional rhetorical criteria and might be considered a fault of style. Pleonasm may also be used for emphasis, or because the phrase has become established in a certain form. Tautology and pleonasm are not consistently differentiated in literature.

Hand-waving is a pejorative label for attempting to be seen as effective – in word, reasoning, or deed – while actually doing nothing effective or substantial. It is often applied to debating techniques that involve fallacies, misdirection and the glossing over of details. It is also used academically to indicate unproven claims and skipped steps in proofs, with some specific meanings in particular fields, including literary criticism, speculative fiction, mathematics, logic, science and engineering.

A garden-path sentence is a grammatically correct sentence that starts in such a way that a reader's most likely interpretation will be incorrect; the reader is lured into a parse that turns out to be a dead end or yields a clearly unintended meaning. "Garden path" refers to the saying "to be led down [or up] the garden path", meaning to be deceived, tricked, or seduced. In A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (1926), Fowler describes such sentences as unwittingly laying a "false scent".

Nonsense is a communication, via speech, writing, or any other symbolic system, that lacks any coherent meaning. Sometimes in ordinary usage, nonsense is synonymous with absurdity or the ridiculous. Many poets, novelists and songwriters have used nonsense in their works, often creating entire works using it for reasons ranging from pure comic amusement or satire, to illustrating a point about language or reasoning. In the philosophy of language and philosophy of science, nonsense is distinguished from sense or meaningfulness, and attempts have been made to come up with a coherent and consistent method of distinguishing sense from nonsense. It is also an important field of study in cryptography regarding separating a signal from noise.

A misnomer is a name that is incorrectly or unsuitably applied. Misnomers often arise because something was named long before its correct nature was known, or because an earlier form of something has been replaced by a later form to which the name no longer suitably applies. A misnomer may also be simply a word that someone uses incorrectly or misleadingly. The word "misnomer" does not mean "misunderstanding" or "popular misconception", and a number of misnomers remain in common usage — which is to say that a word being a misnomer does not necessarily make usage of the word incorrect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American and British English spelling differences</span> Comparison between US and UK English spelling

Despite the various English dialects spoken from country to country and within different regions of the same country, there are only slight regional variations in English orthography, the two most notable variations being British and American spelling. Many of the differences between American and British English / Commonwealth English date back to a time before spelling standards were developed. For instance, some spellings seen as "American" today were once commonly used in Britain, and some spellings seen as "British" were once commonly used in the United States.

<i>Sic</i> Mark indicating that "errors" in a quotation stem from the source

The Latin adverb sic inserted after a quoted word or passage indicates that the quoted matter has been transcribed or translated exactly as found in the source text, complete with any erroneous, archaic, or otherwise nonstandard spelling, punctuation, or grammar. It also applies to any surprising assertion, faulty reasoning, or other matter that might be interpreted as an error of transcription.

Fewer versus less is the debate revolving around grammatically using the words fewer and less correctly. The common perspective of today is that fewer should be used with nouns for countable objects and concepts. On the other hand less should be used only with a grammatically singular noun. This distinction was first expressed by grammarian Robert Baker in 1770, and has been supported as a general rule since then by other notable grammarians. However, a more recent perspective based on current usage notes that, while the rule for fewer stands, the word less is used more fluidly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English possessive</span> Possessive words and phrases in the English language

In English, possessive words or phrases exist for nouns and most pronouns, as well as some noun phrases. These can play the roles of determiners or of nouns.

Comprised of is an expression in English that means "composed of". This is thought by language purists to be improper because to "comprise" can already mean to "be composed of", and by that definition, "comprised of" would be ungrammatical. However, another widely accepted definition of to "comprise" is to "compose", hence the commonly accepted meaning of "comprised of" as "composed of".

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Fowler, Henry (1965). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (Second ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Okrent, Arika (16 September 2013). "How Does an Exception Prove a Rule?". Mental Floss. Retrieved 2 July 2019.
  3. ↑ "Full Definition of PROVE". Merriam-webster. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  4. ↑ Weeks, Albert Loren, ed., The Style Book of The Detroit News, p.55.
  5. 1 2 3 Holton, Richard. "The Exception Proves the Rule". Philpapers. Retrieved 2 July 2019.
  6. 1 2 Acocella, Joan. "The English Wars". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2 July 2019.
  7. 1 2 3 "Oxford English Dictionary Online:Exception". Oxford University Press. Retrieved 2 July 2019.
  8. 1 2 Clairmont, Nicholas (2 July 2013). ""The Exception That Proves the Rule" Explained". Big Think. Retrieved 2 July 2019.
  9. ↑ The exception proves the rule Archived 2008-04-05 at the Wayback Machine , alt-usage-english.org
  10. ↑ [anonymous] (1688). An Answer to a Paper Importing a Petition of the Archbishop of Canterbury and Six other Bishops to His Majesty. London: Henry Hills. p. 14. A bishop ... is not bound to obey any Mandate but the King's; which Exception proves the Rule, and that he is inexcusably oblig'd to obey the King's
  11. ↑ "A Gentleman of Lincoln's Inn" (1775). A Digest of Adjudged Cases in the Court of King's Bench. London: G. Kearsly and G. Robinson. p. 85. hdl:2027/osu.32437121673418. Some statutes give justices of the peace a power of proceeding on default, butthe exception proves the rulein the thing not excepted; it seems therefore that the defendant should have been apprehended by a warrant
  12. ↑ Tregeur, Pascal (12 November 2017). "The Proof of the Pudding is in the Eating: Meaning, Origin and Variants". Word Histories. Retrieved 4 July 2019.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.