Fixed penalty notice

Last updated

In the United Kingdom, a fixed penalty notice (FPN) is a notice giving an individual the opportunity to be made immune from prosecution for an alleged criminal offence in exchange for a fee. [1] Fixed penalty notices were introduced in Britain in the 1980s to deal with minor parking offences. Originally used by police and traffic wardens, their use has extended to other public officials and authorities, as has the range of offences for which they can be used.

Contents

In recent years, this has taken the form of using them to give police and public authorities in England, Scotland and Wales a realistic weapon against anti-social behaviour. They are designed to reduce paperwork on police and council officers by allowing low-level anti-social behaviour to be dealt with on the spot. Newer types of notice exist for disorder, environmental crime, truancy and noise. A fixed penalty notice is not a fine or criminal conviction because of the distinction that the recipient can opt for the matter to be dealt with in court instead of paying. However, if the recipient neither pays the penalty nor opts for a court hearing in the time specified, [2] it may then be enforced by the normal methods used to enforce unpaid fines, including imprisonment in some circumstances.

Civil penalties such as penalty charge notices (PCNs) are similar legal constructs used for issuing on-the-spot fines. Unlike FPNs, civil penalties have an assumption of "guilty until proven innocent" with a burden being placed on the individual to appeal the fine. Civil penalties can be issued for property violations, [3] tax code violations [4] or illegal employment. [5] The appeal processes for PCNs tend to operate through tribunals.

History

FPNs were originally introduced for parking and motoring offences by part III of the Transport Act 1982 [6] (replaced by the Road Traffic Act 1988 [7] ); in many areas this style of enforcement has been taken over from police by local authorities. The Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, which came into force in 2003, introduced fixed penalty notices, sometimes referred to as on-the-spot fines, for being drunk and disorderly and making hoax emergency calls. [8]

Examples

Penalty charge notices (parking and motoring offences)

Other than parking, motoring offences can also be dealt with by the issue of FPNs by police, officers of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency or local authority personnel. A penalty notice issued by local authority parking attendants is a civil penalty backed with powers to obtain payment by civil action and is defined as a penalty charge notice (PCN), distinguishing it from other FPNs which are often backed with a power of criminal prosecution if the penalty is not paid; in the latter case the "fixed penalty" is sometimes designated as a "mitigated penalty" to indicate the avoidance of being prosecuted which it provides.

If a PCN is paid within 14 days of the 28-day period, the charge is decreased by 50%. [9] Appealing against or contesting a PCN requires going through a formal process: if lost, the 50% period pay could be extended. To appeal a PCN normally an informal appeal is made to the body that issued you the ticket, if not an appeal may be made to adjudicating bodies created according to the Traffic Management Act 2004, [10] and finally this body’s decisions can be challenged by judicial review.

If the offer of immunity from prosecution is declined by declining an FPN, a government body may choose to prosecute for the incident covered by the FPN.[ citation needed ]

PCNs should not be confused with parking charge notices, [11] the latter, being issued by private landowners seeking to impose a charge [12] for parking on private land.

Penalty notices for disorder

A penalty notice for disorder, PND, was defined in the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, [13] based on the success of the 1998 anti-social behaviour order (ASBO).

Issued under Section 1–11 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 [13] for public disorder offences and divided into "lower-tier" and "higher-tier" offences each with its own penalty amount, a penalty notice for disorder (PND) can only be issued to people aged 18 or over. There are 26 offences for which a notice can be issued, such as being drunk and disorderly in a public place, selling alcohol to a minor (under 18), threatening behaviour or language and "behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress to others". Penalty notices can also be issued for minor shop thefts and minor criminal damage and in January 2009 the offence of possession of cannabis was added to the scheme. Recipients have 21 days to pay the notice or request a court hearing. If a penalty notice is not paid after 21 days then the outstanding amount is increased by 50% and if it is still unpaid the fine is lodged at the local magistrates' court just as if the matter was an unpaid court fine. This is where PNDs and FPNs vary if they are not paid: the former results in an unpaid fine being lodged and the latter results in the recipient being summoned to court to answer for the original offence.

When paying PNDs, no admission of guilt is required. Paying the PND involves neither an official finding nor an acceptance of guilt and discharges all liability to conviction for the offence. PNDs for recordable offences are however recorded on the Police National Computer and may be disclosed on an Enhanced Criminal Records Disclosure issued by the Disclosure and Barring Service, if it is concluded that the behaviour leading to the PND was relevant to the matter at hand, for example, the applicant's suitability to work with children. However, the mere fact that a PND has been issued would not make it relevant.

PNDs are generally issued to first-time offenders with no previous record. PNDs do not constitute a criminal record; they are non-conviction information and treated as intelligence.

Experiments with juvenile PNDs

In some areas there was a pilot scheme, documented in November 2008, that allowed PNDs to be issued to 10- to 15-year-olds  the parent or guardian was liable for the penalty. The tariff was reduced, £40 for the higher-tier offences and £30 for the lower-tier offences. The police forces that piloted juvenile PNDs were: [14]

  • British Transport Police (Birmingham Division)
  • Essex
  • Lancashire
  • Merseyside
  • Metropolitan Police (Kingston Division)
  • Nottinghamshire
  • West Midlands

FPNs for environmental crime

FPNs are available as a means for dealing with various environmental crimes. The first was introduced in 1990 for leaving litter, and since then numerous others have followed, particularly as a result of the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003, and the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005.

The majority of these are issued by local authority officers, but police and Environment Agency officers have been authorised to issue some. The penalty ranges[ when? ] from £20 for unnecessary idling of a stationary vehicle engine to £500 for failing to comply with a noise warning notice in licensed premises.[ citation needed ]

By far the majority of FPNs issued for environmental crimes are for leaving litter, failing to remove dog faeces, and fly posting. The government has determined that fly tipping is too serious to warrant a fixed penalty, and that cases should be referred to a magistrates' court.[ citation needed ]

Minor criminal damage such as graffiti may also be dealt with by issuing an FPN. [15]

FPN for truancy

Section 23 of the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003 allows local authorities, head teachers (or their deputies) and the police to issue a £50 or £100 FPN to a parent or parents who fail to ensure that their child regularly attends school.

The Education and Inspections Act 2006 came into force on 4 September 2007. Under this, parents of children excluded from school are required to keep them under supervision for the first five days of their exclusion. If the child is found in a public place without their parent during this time, the parent can be issued a £50 penalty notice, which rises to £100 if not paid in 28 days.

FPN for night noise

Section 2 of the Noise Act 1996 [16] allows local authorities to investigate complaints from residents about excessive noise coming from a residential dwelling during the night, defined as between the hours of 11:00 pm and 7:00 am.

FPN for breaches of COVID-19 restrictions

Regulations issued in 2020 introduced FPNs with penalties ranging from £30 to £10,000 for various violations of restrictions brought in to control the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom, including via the Health Protection Regulations 2020 and the COVID-19 local lockdown regulations. On 28 August 2020, The Health Protection Regulations 2020 statutary instrument, SI 907/202,0 increased the FPN in some cases, saying it "must be £10,000" in case an assembly of "more than thirty persons". [17]

As of March 2022, 118,978 notices were issued in England and Wales. [18] In Scotland, the most deprived 10% of neighbourhoods were 11.2 times more likely to receive an FPN than the least deprived 10%. National Police Chiefs’ Council statistics showed Black and Asian people received fines 1.8 times more than white people. Labour MP Harriet Harman, said it was clear that young people, ethnic minority people, men, also the most socially deprived, were at most at risk and poor people were criminalised rather than the better off. [19] The Joint Committee on Human Rights said the application of FPNs was "muddled, discriminatory and unfair". [19]

Some FPNs during the COVID-19 lockdown were wrongly issued. Of those where an individual declined to pay and were prosecuted in open court 25% were wrongly issued. [18] Giving evidence to parliament barrister Kirsty Brimelow said it was likely that thousands of FPNs were incorrectly issued. [20] In April 2021, The Justice Gap reported that it was estimated that 85,000 Covid-regulation-related FPNs had been issued and that a cross-party group of MPs and peers wanted each to be reviewed. [19]

Challenges to the enforceability of PCNs

The Bill of Rights 1689 creates legislation stating "all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void". [21] Since PCNs create fines before conviction, there have been attempts to challenge PCN legislation using the Bill of Rights 1689.

Robin de Crittenden sought a judicial review on these grounds in 2006. [22] His request for judicial review was declined by Justice Collins on the grounds that PCNs are "not a fine or forfeiture within the meaning of the Bill of Rights" because what the Bill of Rights prevents is "a fine or a forfeiture in respect of which there is no right of appeal, whether ultimately to a court or through a system which is set up which is equivalent to a court." While maintaining that PCNs are compatible with the Bill of Rights, Collins commented [23] that the clarity of legislation should be used as a factor when determining if new legislation is compatible with preexisting legislation: "If it passes an Act which clearly states something which could arguably be said to be contrary to a previous Act, then if it is clear and if there is no argument that can be raised against its clear meaning, it will prevail."

Case law created at a later date touches on the ability to impliedly repeal parts of the Bill of Rights. In Thoburn v Sunderland City Council , Lord Justice Laws, ruled that constitutional statutes could not be impliedly repealed ("Ordinary statutes may be impliedly repealed. Constitutional statutes may not. For the repeal of a constitutional Act or the abrogation of a fundamental right to be effected by statute, the court would apply this test: is it shown that the legislature's actual – not imputed, constructive or presumed – intention was to effect the repeal or abrogation?") stating that "the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights 1689, the Act of Union, the Reform Acts [...], the HRA, the Scotland Act 1998 and the Government of Wales Act 1998" are examples of constitutional statutes.

The implications of the ruling of Thoburn v Sunderland City Council to the enforcement of civil penalties were, to some degree, tested in the First-tier Tribunal case Pendle v HMRC, [24] though since First-tier Tribunal rulings are non-binding [25] this decision would only be taken as advisory in any other court.

Regional fixed penalty offices

There are three regional fixed penalty offices, in Morley, Leeds, covering the north of England, [26] Loughborough, covering the Midlands and Wales, [27] and Southend-on-Sea, covering the south of England. [28]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal record</span> Record of a persons criminal history

A criminal record is a record of a person's criminal convictions history. The information included in a criminal record and the existence of a criminal record varies between countries and even between jurisdictions within a country. In most cases it lists all non-expunged criminal offences and may also include traffic offences such as speeding and drunk driving. In most countries a criminal record is limited to unexpunged and unexpired actual convictions, while in some it can also include arrests, charges dismissed, charges pending and charges of which the individual has been acquitted. The term rap sheet refers to Record of Arrest and Prosecution, similar to a criminal record.

An anti-social behaviour order is a civil order made in the United Kingdom against a person who had been shown, on the balance of evidence, to have engaged in anti-social behaviour. The orders were introduced by Prime Minister Tony Blair in 1998, and continued in use until abolished in England and Wales by the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 on 20 October 2014—although they continue to be used in Scotland and Northern Ireland. ASBOs were replaced in England and Wales by the civil injunctions and criminal behaviour orders. They were designed to address behaviours like intimidation, drunkenness, and violence by individuals and families, using civil orders rather than criminal sanctions. The orders restricted behaviour in some way, such as: prohibiting a return to a certain area or shop; or restricting public behaviours, such as swearing or drinking alcohol. Many saw the ASBOs as connected with young delinquents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Traffic ticket</span> Type of notice issued by a law enforcement official

A traffic ticket is a notice issued by a law enforcement official to a motorist or other road user, indicating that the user has violated traffic laws. Traffic tickets generally come in two forms, citing a moving violation, such as exceeding the speed limit, or a non-moving violation, such as a parking violation, with the ticket also being referred to as a parking citation, or parking ticket.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parking enforcement officer</span> Official who issues tickets for vehicle parking violations

A parking enforcement officer (PEO), traffic warden, parking inspector/parking officer, or civil enforcement officer is a member of a traffic control agency, local government, or police force who issues tickets for parking violations. The term parking attendant is sometimes considered a synonym but sometimes used to refer to the different profession of parking lot attendant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 (c.38) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which almost entirely applies only to England and Wales. The Act, championed by then Home Secretary, David Blunkett, was passed in 2003. As well as strengthening the anti-social behaviour order and Fixed Penalty Notice provisions, and banning spray paint sales to people under the age of 16, it gives local councils the power to order the removal of graffiti from private property.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts of Scotland</span> Administration of justice in Scotland

The courts of Scotland are responsible for administration of justice in Scotland, under statutory, common law and equitable provisions within Scots law. The courts are presided over by the judiciary of Scotland, who are the various judicial office holders responsible for issuing judgments, ensuring fair trials, and deciding on sentencing. The Court of Session is the supreme civil court of Scotland, subject to appeals to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, and the High Court of Justiciary is the supreme criminal court, which is only subject to the authority of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on devolution issues and human rights compatibility issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hoon</span> Person driving in an anti-social way

A hoon is an Australian and New Zealander term describing a person who deliberately drives a vehicle in a reckless or dangerous manner, generally in order to provoke a reaction from onlookers.

Public intoxication, also known as "drunk and disorderly" and "drunk in public", is a summary offense in some countries rated to public cases or displays of drunkenness. Public intoxication laws vary widely by jurisdiction, but usually require an obvious display of intoxicated incompetence or behavior which disrupts public order before the charge is levied.

A police caution is a formal alternative to prosecution in minor cases, administered by the police in England and Wales. It is commonly used to resolve cases where full prosecution is not seen as the most appropriate solution. Accepting a caution requires an admission of guilt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decriminalised parking enforcement</span> Civil enforcement of UK car parking regulations

Decriminalised parking enforcement (DPE) is the name given in the United Kingdom to the civil enforcement of car parking regulations, carried out by civil enforcement officers, operating on behalf of a local authority. The Road Traffic Act 1991 (c. 40) provided for the decriminalisation of parking-related contraventions committed within controlled parking zones (CPZ) administered by local councils across the UK. The CPZs under the control of the local councils are also referred to as yellow routes and they can be easily identified with yellow lines marked on the roads with relevant time plates. Councils employ parking attendants to enforce their CPZs directly.

The Highway Traffic Act is a statute in Ontario, Canada, which regulates the licensing of vehicles, classification of traffic offences, administration of loads, classification of vehicles and other transport-related issues. First introduced in 1923 to deal with increasing accidents during the early years of motoring in Ontario, and replacing earlier legislation such as the Highway Travel Act, there have been amendments due to changes to driving conditions and new transportation trends. For example, in 2009, the Act was revised to ban the use of cell phones while driving.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protection from Harassment Act 1997</span> Law of the United Kingdom

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. On introducing the Bill's second reading in the House of Lords, the Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, said, "The aim of this Bill is to protect the victims of harassment. It will protect all such victims whatever the source of the harassment—so-called stalking behaviour, racial harassment, or anti-social behaviour by neighbours." Home Office guidance on the Act says "The legislation was always intended to tackle stalking, but the offences were drafted to tackle any form of persistent conduct which causes another person alarm or distress."

A civil enforcement officer is a person employed to enforce parking, traffic and other restrictions and laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fiscal fine</span>

A fiscal fine is a form of deferred prosecution agreement in Scotland issued by a procurator fiscal for certain summary offences as an alternative to prosecution. Alternatives to prosecution are called direct measures in Scotland.

The powers of the police in Scotland, as with much of Scots law, are based on mixed elements of statute law and common law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sentencing in England and Wales</span>

Sentencing in England and Wales refers to a bench of magistrates or district judge in a magistrate's court or a judge in the Crown Court passing sentence on a person found guilty of a criminal offence. In deciding the sentence, the court will take into account a number of factors: the type of offence and how serious it is, the timing of any plea of guilty, the defendant's character and antecedents, including their criminal record and the defendant's personal circumstances such as their financial circumstances in the case of a fine being imposed.

An Administrative Monetary Penalty is a civil penalty imposed by a regulator for a contravention of an Act, regulation or by-law. It is issued upon discovery of an unlawful event, and is due and payable subject only to any rights of review that may be available under the AMP's implementing scheme. It is regulatory in nature, rather than criminal, and is intended to secure compliance with a regulatory scheme, and it can be employed with the use of other administrative sanctions, such as demerit points and license suspensions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which consolidated and expanded law enforcement powers in addressing anti-social behaviour. One significant aspect of the act is that it replaced anti-social behaviour orders, the primary civil order in the United Kingdom since 1998, with criminal behaviour orders.

The Traffic Penalty Tribunal is a tribunal in the United Kingdom which manages appeals against penalty charge notices or PCNs, a form of civil penalty, for areas in England outside of London. It was created by statute to fulfil provisions of the Traffic Management Act 2004, it is partly responsible to the PATROL joint committee, a collection of local authorities responsible for enforcing PCNs who make use of the traffic penalty tribunals adjudication process.

References

  1. "Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001: Section 2". legislation.gov.uk.
  2. "Road Traffic Offences: Guidance on Fixed Penalty Notices". Archived from the original on 21 February 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2011.
  3. "Civil Penalties under the Housing and Planing Act". 6 April 2018.
  4. "Vat Civil Penalties".
  5. "Penalties for Employing Illegal Workers".
  6. "Transport ACT 1982". www.legislation.gov.uk.
  7. "Road Traffic Act 1988". www.legislation.gov.uk.
  8. Lacey, Nicola; Wells, Celia; Quick, Oliver (September 2003). Reconstructing Criminal Law: Text and Materials. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-60604-2.
  9. "Parking fines and penalty charge notices". gov.uk. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  10. "Traffic Management Act 2004".
  11. "Notices". rac.co.uk. Retrieved 9 November 2019.
  12. "Parking Enforcement Signs | Parking Problems | Parking Solution | No Parking | Fine | PCN". www.parkingenforcement.online.
  13. 1 2 "Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 (c. 16)". Opsi.gov.uk. 11 May 2001. Retrieved 24 June 2010.
  14. Amadi, Juliana (November 2008). "Piloting Penalty Notices for Disorder on 10- to 15-year-olds: results from a one year pilot" (PDF). dera.ioe.ac.uk. Ministry of Justice.
  15. "Crime prevention" . Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  16. "Noise Act 1996 (c. 37)". Opsi.gov.uk. 18 July 1996. Retrieved 24 June 2010.
  17. "The Health Protection (Coronavirus) (Restrictions on Holding of Gatherings and Amendment) (England) Regulations 2020". legislation.gov.uk. OGL v3.0.
  18. 1 2 "Update on Coronavirus FPNs issued by forces in England and Wales, and the payment of FPNs" (PDF). National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC). Archived from the original on 19 November 2022. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
  19. 1 2 3 Ferreira, Douglas (29 April 2021). "MPs and peers call for every Covid fine issued under coronavirus regulations to be reviewed". The Justice Gap.
  20. "The Government response to covid-19: fixed penalty notices". UK Parliament.
  21. "Bill of Rights 1689".
  22. [DE CRITTENDEN v NATIONAL. PARKING ADJUDICATION SERVICE] Court/2006/{{{num}}}.html [2006] High Court {{{num}}}(Queen's Bench)
  23. Blick A, Howarth D, le Roux N. Distinguishing constitutional legislation (PDF). Constitutional Society. p. 13. ISBN   978-0-9928904-2-1.
  24. "Pendle v HMRC (First-tier Tribunal)".
  25. "HMRC: Inheritance Tax Manual".
  26. HM Courts & Tribunals Service, North Regional Fixed Penalty Office, accessed 7 August 2022
  27. HM Courts & Tribunals Service, Midlands and Wales Regional Fixed Penalty Office, accessed 7 August 2022
  28. HM Courts & Tribunals Service, South Regional Fixed Penalty Office, accessed 7 August 2022
Services