Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

Last updated

Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
Act of Parliament
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Variant 1, 2022).svg
Parliament of the United Kingdom
Long title An Act to make provision in connection with anti-social behaviour, crime and disorder, including provision about recovery of possession of dwelling-houses, to make provision amending the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, the Police Act 1997, Schedules 7 and 8 to the Terrorism Act 2000, the Extradition Act 2003 and Part 3 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011; to make provision about firearms, about sexual harm and violence and about forced marriage; to make provision about the police, the Independent Police Complaints Commission and the Serious Fraud Office (United Kingdom); to make provision about invalid travel documents; to make provision about criminal justice and court fees; and for connected purposes.
Citation 2014 c. 12
Introduced by Theresa May (Commons)
John Taylor, Baron Taylor of Holbeach (Lords)
Territorial extent  Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom
Dates
Royal assent 13 March 2014
Other legislation
Repeals/revokes Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 Pts 1 and 1A
Relates to Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, the Police Act 1997, Schedules 7 and 8 of the Terrorism Act 2000, the Extradition Act 2003 and Part 3 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011
Status: Current legislation
Text of statute as originally enacted
Text of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk.

The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (c. 12) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which consolidated and expanded law enforcement powers in addressing anti-social behaviour. One significant aspect of the act is that it replaced anti-social behaviour orders, the primary civil order in the United Kingdom since 1998, with criminal behaviour orders.

Contents

Background

The 2010 coalition government expressed its intention to replace ASBOs, citing the reasons that "breach rates are high, and the number issued has been steadily declining since 2005." [1] In July 2010, Home Secretary Theresa May announced her intention to reform anti-social behaviour measures for England and Wales, with the abolition of ASBOs in due course in favour of alternative "community-based" social control policies. [2]

In 2012, the government produced a white paper titled Putting victims first: more effective responses to anti-social behaviour, that outlined its intentions about reforming anti-social behaviour legislation. The white paper stated that it wanted to challenge "dangerous and yobbish behaviour of those who make victims’ lives a misery". [3] Liberal Democrat objections prevented the implementation of the paper's proposals. [4] The 2013 government paper, Reform of Anti-Social Behaviour Powers: Groups ‘Hanging Around’ mentioned specifically targeting certain types of youths behaviour. It mentioned that the government acknowledged that youths ‘hanging about’ might cause people to feel intimidated and fear for their safety regardless if their behaviour was anti-social. [5] Government publications also revealed it was eager to deal with concerns about the perceived anti-social behaviour of people who are drunks, beggars, and irresponsible dog owners. [3] [5] [6]

In May 2013, an Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill was introduced into the House of Commons, [7] [8] including a provision to create "injunctions to prevent nuisance and annoyance", replacing ASBOs in England and Wales. [1] The bill was criticised for the broad and undefined scope of "nuisance and annoyance", [9] and was rejected by the House of Lords in January 2014. [10] The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 was then introduced, and received royal assent on 13 March 2014.

Putting victims first

The focus for the act was on putting victims first, and the powers are designed to be quicker to implement so that victims get respite from anti-social behaviour faster. With the exception of the criminal behaviour order, the remainder can be processed through the civil courts which allows for a lower burden of proof and thus makes it easier for agencies to obtain. The act also set out an absolute possession enabling councils and housing associations to evict anti-social tenants already found guilty of anti-social behaviour.

To put victims first, there were also two measures introduced in this act to enable victims to have their say:

  1. Community remedy – whereby victims can have a say in what type of punishment would be appropriate for the offender (e.g. clean up graffiti)
  2. Anti-social behaviour case review – also called 'community trigger'. A victim can insist on a multi-agency review of their case if they have reported the problem three times in the past six months and yet the problem has not yet been resolved.

Consolidation

The focus of the Act was to streamline the tools and powers available to front-line agencies in dealing with anti-social behaviour. Previously there had been nineteen different powers, but these were reduced to a base of six.

The previous nineteen mechanisms were: [3]

The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 consolidated them to:

The government produces statutory guidance about the use of the six new mechanisms. December 2017 is the latest revision of the guidance as of May 2018. [11]

Civil injunctions

Part 1 of the Act empowers specified organisations to apply to the courts for a civil injunction against anyone aged 10 or over for actual or threatened anti-social behaviour. [12] Suggested by the government is that civil injunctions might be used for aggressive begging, bullying, gangs, irresponsible dog ownership, noisy or abusive neighbours, public drunkenness, and vandalism. [11] The injunction is a civil rather than a criminal order. A civil injunction can either prohibit or require a person to refrain from activities mentioned in the order. A court has the discretion if to include a power of arrest for breaches of the injunction. Breaches of an injunction are treated as contempt of court. [12] Statutory government guidance provides four tests for using a civil injunction. On the balance of probabilities, the behaviour must be likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress (non-housing related anti-social behaviour); or conduct capable of causing nuisance or annoyance (housing-related anti-social behaviour); and just and convenient to grant the injunction to prevent anti-social behaviour. [11]

Criminal behaviour orders

Dispersal powers

Part 3 of the Act covers police powers permitting the dispersal of people. The powers of dispersal require the authorisation of a police officer at least the rank of inspector. The act only allows authorising dispersal powers when members of the public in the locality are being harassed, alarmed or distressed, or when there is localised crime and disorder. The authorisation is limited to forty-eight hours. [12] Authorising officers should consider the principles of the Human Rights Act. [12] The statutory Government guidance requires consideration of the impact of vulnerable people, the displacement of the problems elsewhere, and if working in partnership with other agencies might provide a longer-term solution. [11]

When authorised to do so, police officers and police community support officers, if permitted by their chief constable, can, in writing when feasible, direct a person to leave a geographical area and not return for a defined time period. [12] The exceptions are people under ten years old, [12] in which case if they are under sixteen the Children Act 2004 allows taking them to their home. [11] A direction should not be given that prevents a person from going to their home, their place of employment, where they are receiving education or training, places where they are receiving medical treatment or any place they are required to attend by a court. The power exists to seize any articles that are connected to the anti-social behaviour. [12] Failing to disperse or preventing the seizure of articles related to the anti-social behaviour is a criminal offence. [11]

Public spaces protection orders

PSPO warning sign in Knightsbridge, London PSPO zone sign.jpg
PSPO warning sign in Knightsbridge, London

Public spaces protection orders are orders which ban specific acts in a designated geographical area in England and Wales as set out in the act. It replaces the earlier designated public place orders, gating orders and dog control orders. [13]

PSPOs are intended to prevent specific acts which would not otherwise be criminal offences. They have been criticised as restricting freedoms and having a disproportionately severe effect on people below the poverty line. [14] As of December 2017, there were 388 active PSPOs in Wales alone. [15]

Uses of PSPOs have ranged from Salford City Council's ban on foul and abusive language in the Salford Quays area, [16] to the enactment by Kettering Borough Council of a curfew banning individuals under 18 from going outside alone between 11pm and 6am. [17]

Research by The Manifesto Club found a 420% increase in PSPO fines from 2016 to 2018. In 2018 there were 9,930 fixed penalty notices issued, 60% of which were from four councils: Peterborough, Bedford, Hillingdon and Waltham Forest. These four councils use private contractors to issue the fines. [18]

Community protection notices and remedial orders

Part 4 of the Act introduced community protection notices and remedial orders. The aim of them was to challenge ongoing nuisance problems detrimental to a community's quality of life. [12] The use of community protection notices does not interfere with the obligation of local authorities to issue abatement notices for statutory nuisances. [11]

A person over the age of sixteen, an organisation or business can be issued a community protection notice. [12] The statutory guidance states that the vulnerability of a person should additionally be considered before issuing a notice. [11] Before a notice is issued they must receive written notice warning them about the problem they are causing, and issuing a notice is an option being considered. It is issued by either giving it to a person, organisation or business, leaving at their address, or posting it to them. Community protection notices have three potential purposes, to stop or make them do something, or take reasonable steps towards an outcome. What is expected of them is written on the notice. [12]

Failing to conform to a community protection notice is an offence. [12] The liability of a person, organisation or business for the offence is negated by payment of a fixed penalty notice up to the value of £100. [11] [12] If a community protection notice is breached, a remedial order can be applied for at court. [12]

Closure notices and orders

A closure notice issued under the act on residential property in Starbeck, Harrogate. 19 Avenue Grove, Starbeck with a closure notice for anti-social behaviour (18th September 2021) 001.jpg
A closure notice issued under the act on residential property in Starbeck, Harrogate.

Part 4 of the act empowers the issuing of closure notices and closure orders. Both notices and orders can be applied to residential and other premises. Issuing a closure notice is usually the first resort to dealing with a problem. Closure notices can be issued if either nuisance or disorder has, or may occur at the premises. The notice is in force for a maximum of forty-eight hours. A closure notice can bar any person from accessing the premises, except any residents. The penalty for breaching a notice upon conviction is a maximum of three months’ imprisonment and an unlimited fine. [11]

Closure orders are usually issued in more serious instances. The criteria for issuing an order is that the premises must be connected to disorderly, offensive, or criminal behaviour, or disorderly behaviour in the near vicinity of it. It must be a serious nuisance to the public. An order can prohibit any person from entering the premises, including a resident. The maximum penalty for breaching a notice is up to six months imprisonment and an unlimited fine. [11]

The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 created an offence of obstructing a person issuing an order or notice, officials entering the premises, or people securing it. The maximum penalty is three months imprisonment. [11] The act did not consolidate all closure powers, for example, closure of licensed premises under the Licensing Act 2003, or closure of premises used for prostitution under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. [12]

Additional offences

The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 included several additional provisions:

Sexual risk orders

The Act also created sexual risk orders, which can require suspects to give police advanced notification of intention to engage in sexual activities or face prison sentences. The SROs, requested by police, are issued by magistrates. [19]

Forced marriage

The Act also created several new offences relating to forced marriage:

The latter two offences are defined separately for England and Wales and for Scotland. They apply to any marriage ceremony even if not legally binding.

Amendments of the Extradition Act 2003

This bill also added a very important limitation to European Arrest Warrants, barring extradition in the "absence of prosecution decision" if there are reasonable grounds to believe, that the competent authorities in the country requesting the extradition have not made a decision to charge or have not made a decision to try the suspect. This amendment became famously known as "Lex Assange", because Julian Assange in fact never got charged in Sweden, but UK's highest courts still decided the extradition request to be legal.

Criticisms of the Act

A general criticism of the Act was it interfered with the rights of young people, making them feel unable to use public places as they wished, even if their behaviour and activities were lawful. [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Restraining order</span> Legal order prohibiting certain entities from specified actions

A restraining order or protective order, is an order used by a court to protect a person in a situation often involving alleged domestic violence, child abuse, assault, harassment, stalking, or sexual assault.

Breach of the peace or disturbing the peace, is a legal term used in constitutional law in English-speaking countries and in a public order sense in the several jurisdictions of the United Kingdom. It is a form of disorderly conduct.

A Police Community Support Officer, or as written in legislation Community Support Officer, is a uniformed member of police staff in England and Wales, a role created by Section 38(2) of the Police Reform Act 2002, which was given Royal Assent by Queen Elizabeth II on 24 July 2002. They are not warranted, but hold a variety of police powers and the power of a constable in various instances by the forty-three territorial police forces in England and Wales and the British Transport Police.

An anti-social behaviour order is a civil order made in the United Kingdom against a person who had been shown, on the balance of evidence, to have engaged in anti-social behaviour. The orders were introduced by Prime Minister Tony Blair in 1998, and continued in use until abolished in England and Wales by the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 on 20 October 2014—although they continue to be used in Scotland and Northern Ireland. ASBOs were replaced in England and Wales by the civil injunctions and criminal behaviour orders. They were designed to address behaviours like intimidation, drunkenness, and violence by individuals and families, using civil orders rather than criminal sanctions. The orders restricted behaviour in some way, such as: prohibiting a return to a certain area or shop; or restricting public behaviours, such as swearing or drinking alcohol. Many saw the ASBOs as connected with young delinquents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 (c.38) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which almost entirely applies only to England and Wales. The Act, championed by then Home Secretary, David Blunkett, was passed in 2003. As well as strengthening the anti-social behaviour order and Fixed Penalty Notice provisions, and banning spray paint sales to people under the age of 16, it gives local councils the power to order the removal of graffiti from private property.

In English criminal law, public nuisance is a act, condition or thing that is illegal because it interferes with the rights of the general public.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) is an Act of Parliament which instituted a legislative framework for the powers of police officers in England and Wales to combat crime, and provided codes of practice for the exercise of those powers. Part VI of PACE required the Home Secretary to issue Codes of Practice governing police powers. The aim of PACE is to establish a balance between the powers of the police in England and Wales and the rights and freedoms of the public. Equivalent provision is made for Northern Ireland by the Police and Criminal Evidence Order 1989 (SI 1989/1341). The equivalent in Scots Law is the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995.

In the United Kingdom, a fixed penalty notice (FPN) is a notice giving an individual the opportunity to be made immune from prosecution for an alleged criminal offence in exchange for a fee. Fixed penalty notices were introduced in Britain in the 1980s to deal with minor parking offences. Originally used by police and traffic wardens, their use has extended to other public officials and authorities, as has the range of offences for which they can be used.

A police caution is a formal alternative to prosecution in minor cases, administered by the police in England and Wales. It is commonly used to resolve cases where full prosecution is not seen as the most appropriate solution. Accepting a caution requires an admission of guilt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental Protection Act 1990</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Environmental Protection Act 1990 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that as of 2008 defines, within England and Wales and Scotland, the fundamental structure and authority for waste management and control of emissions into the environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crime and Disorder Act 1998</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (c.37) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Act was published on 2 December 1997 and received Royal Assent in July 1998. Its key areas were the introduction of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders, Sex Offender Orders, Parenting Orders, granting local authorities more responsibilities with regards to strategies for reducing crime and disorder, and the introduction of law specific to 'racially aggravated' offences. The Act also abolished rebuttable presumption that a child is doli incapax and formally abolished the death penalty for the last civilian offences carrying it, namely treason and piracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Serious Crime Act 2007</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Serious Crime Act 2007 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that makes several radical changes to English criminal law. In particular, it creates a new scheme of serious crime prevention orders to frustrate crime in England and Wales and in Northern Ireland, replaces the common law crime of incitement with a statutory offence of encouraging or assisting crime, makes provision as to disclosure and information sharing in order to prevent fraud, and abolishes the Assets Recovery Agency creating a new regime for the recovery of the proceeds of crime.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which makes significant changes in many areas of the criminal justice system in England and Wales and, to a lesser extent, in Scotland and Northern Ireland. In particular, it changes the law relating to custodial sentences and the early release of prisoners to reduce prison overcrowding, which reached crisis levels in 2008. It also reduces the right of prison officers to take industrial action, and changed the law on the deportation of foreign criminals. It received royal assent on 8 May 2008, but most of its provisions came into force on various later dates. Many sections came into force on 14 July 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protection from Harassment Act 1997</span> Law of the United Kingdom

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. On introducing the Bill's second reading in the House of Lords, the Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, said, "The aim of this Bill is to protect the victims of harassment. It will protect all such victims whatever the source of the harassment—so-called stalking behaviour, racial harassment, or anti-social behaviour by neighbours." Home Office guidance on the Act says "The legislation was always intended to tackle stalking, but the offences were drafted to tackle any form of persistent conduct which causes another person alarm or distress."

A civil enforcement officer is a person employed to enforce parking, traffic and other restrictions and laws.

In the United Kingdom, an Acceptable Behaviour Contract (ABC) is an early intervention with individuals who are perceived to be engaging in anti-social behaviour. Though they may be used against adults, almost all ABCs concern young people between the ages of 10-18. In the case of a breach of contract or the continuation of unacceptable behavior an Anti-social behaviour order may be used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Policing and Crime Act 2009</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Policing and Crime Act 2009 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Act makes provision about police reform, prostitution, sex offenders, sex establishments and certain other premises. It amends the law on aviation security, misuse, proceeds of crime, extradition and gang related violence.

The powers of the police in England and Wales are defined largely by statute law, with the main sources of power being the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and the Police Act 1996. This article covers the powers of police officers of territorial police forces only, but a police officer in one of the UK's special police forces can utilise extended jurisdiction powers outside of their normal jurisdiction in certain defined situations as set out in statute. In law, police powers are given to constables. All police officers in England and Wales are "constables" in law whatever their rank. Certain police powers are also available to a limited extent to police community support officers and other non warranted positions such as police civilian investigators or designated detention officers employed by some police forces even though they are not constables.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public spaces protection order</span> Orders which ban specific acts in a designated geographical area in England and Wales

Public spaces protection orders (PSPOs) are orders under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 which ban specific acts in a designated geographical area in England and Wales as set out in the act. They replace the earlier designated public place orders, gating orders and dog control orders.

A criminal behaviour order (CBO) is an order to the offender issued by a judge in England and Wales, at the request of the prosecution, under Part 2 of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.

References

  1. 1 2 "Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill Fact sheet: Replacing the ASBO" (PDF). Home Office. October 2013. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  2. ↑ "BBC News 28 July 2010". BBC. 28 July 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2014.
  3. 1 2 3 Home Office (2012). "Putting Victims First: More Effective Responses to Anti-Social Behaviour. Command Paper 8367" (PDF). GOV.UK. p. 3. Retrieved 16 May 2018.
  4. ↑ Morris, Nigel (23 May 2012). "'Crimbos' replace Asbos – but will they rush children into custody?" . The Independent. Archived from the original on 7 May 2022.
  5. 1 2 Home Office (2013). "Reform of Anti-social Behaviour Powers Groups 'Hanging Around'" (PDF). GOV.UK. Retrieved 16 May 2018.
  6. ↑ Home Office (2013). "Reform of Anti-social Behaviour Powers:Public and Open Spaces" (PDF). GOV.UK. Retrieved 16 May 2018.
  7. ↑ "Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill". Home Office. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  8. ↑ "Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill 2013-14". UK Parliament. Archived from the original on 9 January 2014. Retrieved 10 January 2014.
  9. ↑ Laura Tanguay; Jean Parkinson (19 July 2013). "Injunction to Prevent Nuisance and Annoyance". Steeles Law Solicitors Ltd. Archived from the original on 28 July 2013. Retrieved 9 January 2013.
  10. ↑ "Lords reject government's anti-social, crime and policing bill". The Guardian. 9 January 2014.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Home Office (2017). "Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014:Anti-social behaviour powers: Statutory guidance for frontline professionals" (PDF). GOV.UK. Retrieved 16 May 2018.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Richard, Card (19 January 2017). Police law. English, J. (Jack) (Fifteenth ed.). Oxford. ISBN   9780198786801. OCLC   973732993.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  13. ↑ "Public Space Protection Order - What you need to know" (PDF). Bristol City Council. June 2018. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
  14. ↑ Garrett, Bradley (8 September 2015). "PSPOs: the new control orders threatening our public spaces". The Guardian. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
  15. ↑ Wells, Ione (9 December 2017). "Public space orders "make innocent behaviour offences"". BBC. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
  16. ↑ "Salford Council tries to outlaw swearing at the Quays". ITV News. 2 March 2016. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
  17. ↑ "The council which banned sleeping". Politics.co.uk. 5 August 2016. Retrieved 27 December 2022.
  18. ↑ "Huge increase in Public Spaces Protection Order fines". BBC News. 19 April 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
  19. ↑ "Man ordered to tell police if he plans to have sex". BBC News. 22 January 2016.
  20. ↑ Johnstone, C (2016). "After the ASBO: Extending Control Over Young People's Use of Public Spaces in England and Wales" (PDF). Critical Social Policy. 36 (4): 716–726. doi:10.1177/0261018316651943. S2CID   148468829.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.