Four-room house

Last updated
A model of a typical Israelite house, the so-called four-room house. Israelite pillared house.jpg
A model of a typical Israelite house, the so-called four-room house.
A reconstructed Israelite house, 10th-7th centuries BCE, Eretz Israel Museum, Tel Aviv, Israel Reconstructed israelite house, Monarchy period2.jpg
A reconstructed Israelite house, 10th–7th centuries BCE, Eretz Israel Museum, Tel Aviv, Israel
Digital 3D reconstruction of basic space distribution 4 room house (archiology).jpg
Digital 3D reconstruction of basic space distribution

A four-room house, also known as an "Israelite house" or a "pillared house" is the name given to the mud and stone houses characteristic of the Iron Age of Levant.

Contents

The four-room house is so named because its floor plan is divided into four sections, although not all four are proper rooms, one often being an unroofed courtyard. It is also sometimes called a pillared house because two—or all three—of the parallel ground-level "rooms" are separated by one—or two, respectively—rows of wooden pillars. The pillars, however, are not the defining feature of the four-room house, and this error of terminology leads to the confusion of four-room houses with other buildings, such as storehouses and stables, where pillars were widely used, but which were not constructed under the four-room house layout. When an upper floor was included, the inhabitants used it as living quarters, while the ground floor was used as a stable for livestock and for storage. [1] There were multiple variations on the basic four-room house. Some had a five-, three-, or two-room layout, and sometimes the rooms were divided by additional walls into smaller areas. Acknowledging these sub-types of the four-room house, the popularity of the structure started at the beginning of Iron Age I (end of the eleventh century BCE) and dominated the architecture of Israel through Iron Age II until the Babylonian Exile. After the destruction of Judah (of the seventh and sixth centuries BCE) the architecture type was no longer utilized. [2]

Analysis

There have been multiple theories on why the four-room house construction was so popular. Architectural analysis can be made of the residential units by the way they are grouped, the relationship between structures, their size, internal divisions, and the size and structure of the families that inhabited them. [1] Various points can be made about the four-room house pertaining to the culture of their inhabitants. Disparity in house sizes and build quality within towns seem to be a result of socio-economic stratification within cities. Four-roomed houses are found in isolation or built in clusters of grouped units. It can be observed that smaller urban houses, that shared walls between them, were most likely inhabited by nuclear families, while the larger stand-alone houses belonged to extended and wealthy families such as the urban elite. Through the analysis of space syntax within the four-room house, it can be said that the four-room house reflects an egalitarian ideology. The typical four-room house had a layout where all the inner rooms were directly accessible from the house's central space, suggesting that all rooms were equal and there was no hierarchy to the space. The four-room house was unlike the typical Canaanite-Phoenician dwelling, which had a layout where some rooms could be entered only by passing through other rooms, hence showing a hierarchy of access. [2]

Although sometimes considered particularly Israelite, this idea has been challenged. Ziony Zevit writes that although "[t]he Iron Age pillared houses, the "four-room house," are not uniquely Israelite", listing up several Iron Age non-Israelite sites where such houses were found, he nevertheless states that they are unlike the older, "Late Bronze II pillared house discovered at Tel Batash", and finally concludes that, all considered, "they are characteristic of Israelite sites." [3] Their origins are uncertain. [4] [5]

Building patterns and materials

Through archaeological excavations and anthropological studies, it is possible to report on building materials and possible methods used in the construction of the Israelite four-room houses. The Iron I four-room houses typically measured ten to twelve meters long and eight to ten meters wide. The floor plan consists of three axial rooms, connected by one “broadroom" at the rear of the building. Although a majority of houses were not found standing,[ dubious ] through analysis it can be concluded that some houses stood two stories tall. Not all four-room houses were stand-alone houses in the typical American sense. While some houses were found in isolation, other houses were found with shared walls, and even shared the back broadroom wall with a thicker, outer, defensive city wall. [6] The houses could be constructed in a circular pattern, where the outer city wall connected all back broadroom walls, such as in a combination of the casemate wall and the residential wall. [1] The normal walls were around one meter thick,[ dubious ] and were constructed of fieldstones. The exterior defensive walls were thicker. The surfaces of exterior walls were likely plastered to prevent erosion from rainfall, which could be heavy and intense in the winter and spring of the region. The plastering would have demanded a significant quantity of lime to be manufactured, which required a kiln. The floors were composed of beaten earth and flagstone pavement. Finely layered ash and clay helped keep the floors smooth and level. As seen by the sheer volume and weight of all of the stones, wooden pillars, and mudbrick walls used in the construction of the four-room house, it can be said that construction was a team effort that took a lot of energy. [6]

List of sites with four-room houses

Following is a tentative list of Israelite four-room houses at various excavation sites. [7] [8]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philistines</span> Ancient people who lived on the south coast of Canaan

The Philistines were an ancient people who lived on the south coast of Canaan during the Iron Age in a confederation of city-states generally referred to as Philistia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abel-beth-maachah</span>

Tel Abel Beth Maacah is a large archaeological tell with a small upper northern section and a large lower southern one, connected by a saddle. It is located on the northern border of present-day Israel, about 2 km south of the town of Metula and about 6.5 km west of Tel Dan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philistia</span> Geo-political region occupied by the Philistines

Philistia was a confederation of five main cities or pentapolis in the Southwest Levant, made up of principally Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Ekron, and Gath, and for a time, Jaffa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ekron</span> Ancient Philistine city and modern archaeological site in Israel

Ekron, in the Hellenistic period known as Accaron was a Philistine city, one of the five cities of the Philistine Pentapolis, located in present-day Israel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shephelah</span> Lowland region in south-central Israel

The Shephelah or Shfela, lit. "lowlands", is a transitional region of soft-sloping rolling hills in south-central Israel stretching over 10–15 km (6.2–9.3 mi) between the Judaean Mountains and the Coastal Plain. The different use of the term "Judean Plain", as either defining just the Coastal Plain segment stretching along the Judaean Mountains, or also including, or only referring to, the Shfela, often creates grave confusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amihai Mazar</span> Israeli archaeologist

Amihai "Ami" Mazar is an Israeli archaeologist. Born in Haifa, Israel, he has been since 1994 a professor at the Institute of Archaeology of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, holding the Eleazer Sukenik Chair in the Archaeology of Israel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tell Qasile</span>

Tell Qasile is an archaeological site near the Yarkon River in Tel Aviv, Israel. Over 3,000 years old, the site contains the remains of a port city founded by the Philistines in the 12th century BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tel Hazor</span> Archeological site of an ancient city in Israel

Tel Hazor, also Chatsôr, translated in LXX as Hasōr, named in Arabic Tell Waqqas / Tell Qedah el-Gul, is an archaeological tell at the site of ancient Hazor, located in Israel, Upper Galilee, north of the Sea of Galilee, in the northern Korazim Plateau. From the Middle Bronze Age to the Iron Age, Hazor was the largest fortified city in the region and one of the most important in the Fertile Crescent. It maintained commercial ties with Babylon and Syria, and imported large quantities of tin for the bronze industry. In the Book of Joshua, Hazor is described as "the head of all those kingdoms". Though scholars largely do not consider the Book of Joshua to be historically accurate, archaeological excavations have emphasized the city's importance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tel Be'er Sheva</span> Archaeological site in Israel

Tel Sheva or Tel Be'er Sheva, also known as Tell es-Seba, is an archaeological site in the Southern District of Israel, believed to be the site of the ancient biblical town of Beer-sheba. The site lies east of modern Beersheba and west of the Bedouin town of Tel Sheva. Tel Sheva has been preserved and made accessible to visitors in the Tel Be'er Sheva National Park.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tall Zira'a</span> Archaeological site in Jordan

The Tall Zira'a is an archaeological tell in Jordan. Surveys and geophysical investigations showed the site's great potential for excavations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Khirbet Qeiyafa</span> Archaeological site in Israel

KhirbetQeiyafa, also known as Elah Fortress and in Hebrew as Horbat Qayafa, is the site of an ancient fortress city overlooking the Elah Valley and dated to the first half of the 10th century BCE. The ruins of the fortress were uncovered in 2007, near the Israeli city of Beit Shemesh, 30 km (20 mi) from Jerusalem. It covers nearly 2.3 ha and is encircled by a 700-meter-long (2,300 ft) city wall constructed of field stones, some weighing up to eight tons. Excavations at site continued in subsequent years. A number of archaeologists, mainly the two excavators, Yosef Garfinkel and Saar Ganor, have claimed that it might be one of two biblical cities, either Sha'arayim, whose name they interpret as "Two Gates", because of the two gates discovered on the site, or Neta'im; and that the large structure at the center is an administrative building dating to the reign of King David, where he might have lodged at some point. This is based on their conclusions that the site dates to the early Iron IIA, ca. 1025–975 BCE, a range which includes the biblical date for the biblical Kingdom of David. Others suggest it might represent either a North Israelite, Philistine, or Canaanite fortress, a claim rejected by the archaeological team that excavated the site. The team's conclusion that Khirbet Qeiyafa was a fortress of King David has been criticised by some scholars. Garfinkel (2017) changed the chronology of Khirbet Qeiyafa to ca. 1000–975 BCE.

Eglon was a Canaanite city-state mentioned in the Hebrew Bible. According to the Book of Joshua, Debir, king of Eglon, joined a confederation against Gibeon when that city made peace with Israel. The five kings involved were slain and Eglon was later conquered and its inhabitants condemned to destruction. It was thereafter included in the territory of the Tribe of Judah, although it is not mentioned outside of the Book of Joshua.

Giloh was a city in Judah. The biblical town has been identified with Beit Jala.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Khirbet el-Qom</span> Archaeological site in the territory of the biblical kingdom of Judah, between Lachish and Hebron

Khirbet el-Qom is an archaeological site in the village of al-Kum, West Bank, in the territory of the biblical Kingdom of Judah, between Lachish and Hebron, 14 km to the west of the latter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tell ej-Judeideh</span> Ancient archaeological site in the Shfelah

Tell ej-Judeideh is a tell in modern Israel, lying at an elevation of 398 metres (1,306 ft) above sea-level. The Arabic name is thought to mean, "Mound of the dykes." In Modern Hebrew, the ruin is known by the name Tell Goded.

Tell Abu al-Kharaz is an archeological tell in the Irbid Governorate of modern-day Jordan. Tell Abu al-Kharaz was the site of a fortified town during the Bronze and Iron Ages; it is located in the Jordan Valley, 4 kilometers east of the Jordan River.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bull Site</span> Open air ancient cult installation now in the West Bank

The so-called Bull Site is a 12th-century BCE open air ancient cult installation found at Dhahrat et-Tawileh, in the West Bank. The site is named for the bronze sacred bull statuette which was found at the site in 1977.

Tel Qiri is a tel and an ancient village site located inside the modern kibbutz of HaZore'a in northern Israel. It lies on the eastern slopes of the Menashe Heights and the western edge of the Jezreel Valley. As of the beginning of the excavations in 1975, almost half of the site was still visible, but today the entire site is covered by the houses of HaZore'a. The site spans an area of one hectare and is believed to have been a dependency of the nearby Tel Yokneam. The site hosted some human activity during the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods, as well as parts of the Bronze Age. An uninterrupted sequence of settlement lasted from the Iron Age to the Roman-Byzantine period. Unlike all urban centers in northern Israel, the village in Tel Qiri, which flourished during the Iron Age, escaped all military events and no traces of destruction can be found there. This minor, damaged and seemingly insignificant site yielded an amazingly rich and diverse quantity of remains of different periods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tell Qudadi</span> Archaeological site in Tel Aviv, Israel

Tell Qudadi, also known as Tell esh-Shuna is an ancient site located near the mouth of the Yarkon River and the Reading Power Station in the city of Tel Aviv, Israel. It was discovered in 1934 by Jacob Ory and was excavated first by P. L. O. Guy in 1937 and then by Eleazar Sukenik, Shmuel Yeivin and Nahman Avigad in 1937-1938. They discovered a fortress dated to the Iron Age and believed that it was an Israelite fortress built in the 10th or 9th centuries BCE and destroyed by the Neo-Assyrian Empire in the 8th century BCE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Temple in antis</span> Historical architectural design

The temple in antis is an architectural design for temples in Syria and other parts of the Levant starting in the Early Bronze Age and persisting until the Iron Age. The design has a porch formed by extensions, or antae, of the side walls at each side.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Shiloh, Yigal (1987-01-01). "The Casemate Wall, the Four-Room House, and Early Planning in the Israelite City". Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 268 (268): 3–15. doi:10.2307/1356991. JSTOR   1356991. S2CID   163481398.
  2. 1 2 Bunimovitz, Schlomo; Faust, Avraham (2003). "The four room house: Embodying Iron Age Israelite society". Near Eastern Archaeology . Scholars Press, Atlanta, GA. 66 (1–2): 22–31. doi:10.2307/3210929. JSTOR   3210929. S2CID   162312425.
  3. Zevit, Ziony (2003). The Religions of Ancient Israel: A Synthesis of Parallactic Approaches. Bloomsbury. p. 101 (footnote 32). ISBN   9780826463395 . Retrieved 27 January 2017. Israelite house" or a "pillared house" is the name given to the mud and stone houses characteristic of the Iron Age of Levant. Although sometimes considered particularly Israelite, this idea has been challenged. Ziony Zevit writes that "The Iron Age pillared houses, the "four-room house," are not uniquely Israelite. They are found in Iron Age non-Israelite sites such as Tell Kaisan, Tell Abu Hawam IV, and Tell Qasile X, Tell esh-Sharia' VII, but they are unlike the Late Bronze II pillared house discovered at Tel Batash and they are characteristic of Israelite sites (Mazar, 1985a: 67–68; Finkelstein, 1988: 237-59).
  4. van Bekkum, Koert (2011). From Conquest to Coexistence. Brill. p. 76. ISBN   9789004194809.
  5. Ji, Chang-Ho C. "A Note on the Iron Age Four-Room House in Palestine." Orientalia, vol. 66, no. 4, 1997, pp. 387–413. NOVA SERIES, www.jstor.org/stable/43078144.
  6. 1 2 Clark, Douglas R. (2003-01-01). "Bricks, Sweat and Tears: The Human Investment in Constructing a "Four-Room" House". Near Eastern Archaeology . 66 (1/2): 34–43. doi:10.2307/3210930. JSTOR   3210930. S2CID   114526261.
  7. "Four Room House". Madain Project. Archived from the original on 27 November 2021. Retrieved 27 November 2021.
  8. Ji, Chang-Ho C. (1997). "A Note on the Iron Age Four-room House in Palestine". Orientalia. 66 (4): 387–413. JSTOR   43078144 . Retrieved 27 November 2021.
  9. Fischer, Peter M. (2008). "Tell Abu al-Kharaz: A Bead in the Jordan Valley". Near Eastern Archaeology. 71 (4): 211. doi:10.1086/NEA20697190. ISSN   1094-2076. JSTOR   20697190. S2CID   167145910.