Functional morpheme

Last updated

In linguistics, functional morphemes, also sometimes referred to as functors, [1] are building blocks for language acquisition. A functional morpheme (as opposed to a content morpheme) is a morpheme which simply modifies the meaning of a word, rather than supplying the root meaning. Functional morpheme are generally considered a closed class, which means that new functional morphemes cannot normally be created.

Contents

Functional morphemes can be bound, such as verbal inflectional morphology (e.g., progressive -ing, past tense -ed), or nominal inflectional morphology (e.g., plural -s), or free, such as conjunctions (e.g., and, or), prepositions (e.g., of, by, for, on), articles (e.g., a, the), and pronouns (e.g., she, him, it, you, mine). [2] In English, functional morphemes typically consist of consonants that receive low stress such as /s,z,w,ð/. [1] These phonemes are seen in conjunction with short vowels, usually schwa /ə/. Gerken (1994) [1] points out that functional morphemes are indicators of phrases. So, if the word the appears, a noun phrase would be expected to follow. The same occurs with verb phrases and adjective phrases and their corresponding word endings. Functional morphemes tend to occur at the beginning or end of each phrase in a sentence. The previous example of beginning a noun phrase with the indicates a functional morpheme, as does ending a verb phrase with -ed.

Early Language acquisition

Children begin to use functional morphemes in their speech as early as two years old. [2] [3] Functional morphemes encode grammatical meaning within words, but children don't outwardly show their understanding of this. Recently, linguistics have begun to discover that children do recognize functional morphemes when it was previously thought otherwise. [1] LouAnn Gerken at the University of Arizona has done extensive research on language development in children. [1] [4] She argues that even though children may not actually produce functional morphemes in speech, they do appear to understand their use within sentences. [1]

In English

In order to determine if a child does indeed recognize functional morphemes, Gerken conducted an experiment. This experiment was conducted in English and focused on words that were not said, rather than words that were said. She came up with sentences in which weak syllables were used, as well as nonsense (or nonce) words. Variations of the verb pushes was used and then altered to make nonce words like bazes, pusho, and bazo [1] . The second variation used was the noun phrase the dog which was changed to na dep, or some combination of the correct and incorrect words. Through this experiment, Gerken discovered that children tended to not say English function morphemes more than the nonsense words. This is because the actual functional morphemes contained less stress than the nonsense words. Due to the nonsense words containing more stress, children were able to say them more often even though they were not real words in English. One reason why this happens is because functors show an increase in the complexity of sentence structures. So, rather than saying the complex sentences with weakly stressed English words, children tend to say the nonsense sentences more frequently due to their lack of linguistic complexity.

In French

In children who spoke French, it was discovered that they acted similarly to the children that spoke English. [5] [6] An experiment was conducted by Rushen Shi and Melanie Lepage on children who spoke Quebec French. They decided to take the French determiner des, meaning 'the', and compare it with the words mes meaning 'my', and kes (a nonce word). The two verbs used were preuve 'proof' and sangle 'saddle'. The verbs then had functors attached to them and appeared in variation with the three noun phrases. Compared to English functors which can be identified through stress, French functors are identified through syllables. This difference made an important distinction between English and French language learners because Shi found that French speaking children learn functors at an earlier age than English speaking children. [5] In the study conducted it was found that French speaking children were able to identify the functors. This is thought to be because French has a higher frequency of noun phrases which leads children to pay more attention to functors. [5]

In other languages

Research has been done in other languages such as German [7] and Dutch. [8] So far most languages tend to act similar to English, in that children who are acquiring language learn functional morphemes even though it might not be outwardly apparent.

Neural processing of functional morphemes

Lee et.al. conducted a study on adults who had surgery within six months prior to test for their knowledge of functional morphemes and to determine where in the brain these processes occur. [9] The study revolved around the participants' ability to produce the correct form of the verb talk. By doing so, the researchers were able to determine the specific area where the processing of functional morphemes occur. They observed grey and white matter in the brain and found that the processing of function morphemes occurs in the left temporoparietal junction (TPJ). [9] They also discovered that if the adult had received damage to their post-superior temporal gyrus (P-STG), then they would have problems producing functional morphemes in the future. Lee et.al. concluded that functional morphemes are required for producing lexically complex words and sentences, and that damage to the P-STG can result in adults having issues with these processes. [9]  

Bootstrapping

The linguistic theory of bootstrapping refers to how infants come to learn language through the process of language acquisition. [10] By learning functional morphemes, children are unconsciously bootstrapping themselves for other linguistic processes. [2] [11] [12] This includes learning words in general, grammar, the meaning of words, and how phrases work. [5] Through several studies examining children's language acquisition, it was found that children do use functional morphemes to help them develop other parts of their speech. [5]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Language</span> Structured system of communication

Language is a structured system of communication that consists of grammar and vocabulary. It is the primary means by which humans convey meaning, both in spoken and signed forms, and may also be conveyed through writing. Human language is characterized by its cultural and historical diversity, with significant variations observed between cultures and across time. Human languages possess the properties of productivity and displacement, which enable the creation of an infinite number of sentences, and the ability to refer to objects, events, and ideas that are not immediately present in the discourse. The use of human language relies on social convention and is acquired through learning.

A morpheme is the smallest meaningful constituent of a linguistic expression. The field of linguistic study dedicated to morphemes is called morphology.

An adverb is a word or an expression that generally modifies a verb, an adjective, another adverb, a determiner, a clause, a preposition, or a sentence. Adverbs typically express manner, place, time, frequency, degree, or level of certainty by answering questions such as how, in what way, when, where, to what extent. This is called the adverbial function and may be performed by an individual adverb, by an adverbial phrase, or by an adverbial clause.

In grammar, a part of speech or part-of-speech is a category of words that have similar grammatical properties. Words that are assigned to the same part of speech generally display similar syntactic behavior, sometimes similar morphological behavior in that they undergo inflection for similar properties and even similar semantic behavior. Commonly listed English parts of speech are noun, verb, adjective, adverb, pronoun, preposition, conjunction, interjection, numeral, article, and determiner.

In linguistics, function words are words that have little lexical meaning or have ambiguous meaning and express grammatical relationships among other words within a sentence, or specify the attitude or mood of the speaker. They signal the structural relationships that words have to one another and are the glue that holds sentences together. Thus they form important elements in the structures of sentences.

In linguistics, a modifier is an optional element in phrase structure or clause structure which modifies the meaning of another element in the structure. For instance, the adjective "red" acts as a modifier in the noun phrase "red ball", providing extra details about which particular ball is being referred to. Similarly, the adverb "quickly" acts as a modifier in the verb phrase "run quickly". Modification can be considered a high-level domain of the functions of language, on par with predication and reference.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English compound</span> Aspect of English grammar

A compound is a word composed of more than one free morpheme. The English language, like many others, uses compounds frequently. English compounds may be classified in several ways, such as the word classes or the semantic relationship of their components.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Word</span> Basic element of language

A word is a basic element of language that carries meaning, can be used on its own, and is uninterruptible. Despite the fact that language speakers often have an intuitive grasp of what a word is, there is no consensus among linguists on its definition and numerous attempts to find specific criteria of the concept remain controversial. Different standards have been proposed, depending on the theoretical background and descriptive context; these do not converge on a single definition. Some specific definitions of the term "word" are employed to convey its different meanings at different levels of description, for example based on phonological, grammatical or orthographic basis. Others suggest that the concept is simply a convention used in everyday situations.

In linguistics, a suprafix is a type of affix that gives a suprasegmental pattern to either a neutral base or a base with a preexisting suprasegmental pattern. This affix will, then, convey a derivational or inflectional meaning. This suprasegmental pattern acts like segmental phonemes within a morpheme; the suprafix is a combination of suprasegmental phonemes, organized into a pattern, that creates a morpheme. For example, a number of African languages express tense / aspect distinctions by tone. English has a process of changing stress on verbs to create nouns.

Bootstrapping is a term used in language acquisition in the field of linguistics. It refers to the idea that humans are born innately equipped with a mental faculty that forms the basis of language. It is this language faculty that allows children to effortlessly acquire language. As a process, bootstrapping can be divided into different domains, according to whether it involves semantic bootstrapping, syntactic bootstrapping, prosodic bootstrapping, or pragmatic bootstrapping.

Araki is a nearly extinct language spoken in the small island of Araki, south of Espiritu Santo Island in Vanuatu. Araki is gradually being replaced by Tangoa, a language from a neighbouring island.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English prepositions</span> Prepositions in the English language

English prepositions are words – such as of, in, on, at, from, etc. – that function as the head of a prepositional phrase, and most characteristically license a noun phrase object. Semantically, they most typically denote relations in space and time. Morphologically, they are usually simple and do not inflect. They form a closed lexical category.

Vietnamese is an analytic language, meaning it conveys grammatical information primarily through combinations of words as opposed to suffixes. The basic word order is subject-verb-object (SVO), but utterances may be restructured so as to be topic-prominent. Vietnamese also has verb serialization. In sentences, the head of the phrase usually precedes its complements, nouns are classified according to series of lexical parameters, and pronouns may be absent from utterances. Question words in the language do not exhibit wh-movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inflection</span> Process of word formation

In linguistic morphology, inflection is a process of word formation in which a word is modified to express different grammatical categories such as tense, case, voice, aspect, person, number, gender, mood, animacy, and definiteness. The inflection of verbs is called conjugation, while the inflection of nouns, adjectives, adverbs, etc. can be called declension.

A sentence word is a single word that forms a full sentence.

Syntactic bootstrapping is a theory in developmental psycholinguistics and language acquisition which proposes that children learn word meanings by recognizing syntactic categories and the structure of their language. It is proposed that children have innate knowledge of the links between syntactic and semantic categories and can use these observations to make inferences about word meaning. Learning words in one's native language can be challenging because the extralinguistic context of use does not give specific enough information about word meanings. Therefore, in addition to extralinguistic cues, conclusions about syntactic categories are made which then lead to inferences about a word's meaning. This theory aims to explain the acquisition of lexical categories such as verbs, nouns, etc. and functional categories such as case markers, determiners, etc.

Wamesa is an Austronesian language of Indonesian New Guinea, spoken across the neck of the Doberai Peninsula or Bird's Head. There are currently 5,000–8,000 speakers. While it was historically used as a lingua franca, it is currently considered an under-documented, endangered language. This means that fewer and fewer children have an active command of Wamesa. Instead, Papuan Malay has become increasingly dominant in the area.

In the framework of Noam Chomsky's Minimalist Program, items of the lexicon are of two types: with or without substantive content. Items of the former category are called lexical items, whereas items of the latter category are functional items. Functional items carry the grammatical content of a sentence, which means that by taking them out of the sentence one would still understand the meaning, although it would not be grammatical. In other words, they are the 'glue' that holds the sentence together. Functional items can also be classified as closed class, that is, belonging to parts of speech that do not easily allow new members. If functional items are removed from a sentence, the words that would be left are the lexical items. The lexical items of a sentence are those that are used in telegraphic speech; functional items are the grammatical units that hold the sentence together and make it more fluid. Functional Items are feature sets. Functional items include two type of morphemes. Free morphemes, like modals, auxiliaries, determiners, complementizers and bound morphemes such as nominal and verbal affixes. Though functional items have feature structure, the do not enter into θ-marking.

Prosodic bootstrapping in linguistics refers to the hypothesis that learners of a primary language (L1) use prosodic features such as pitch, tempo, rhythm, amplitude, and other auditory aspects from the speech signal as a cue to identify other properties of grammar, such as syntactic structure. Acoustically signaled prosodic units in the stream of speech may provide critical perceptual cues by which infants initially discover syntactic phrases in their language. Although these features by themselves are not enough to help infants learn the entire syntax of their native language, they provide various cues about different grammatical properties of the language, such as identifying the ordering of heads and complements in the language using stress prominence, indicating the location of phrase boundaries, and word boundaries. It is argued that prosody of a language plays an initial role in the acquisition of the first language helping children to uncover the syntax of the language, mainly due to the fact that children are sensitive to prosodic cues at a very young age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English interjections</span> Interjections in the English language

English interjections are a category of English words – such as yeah, ouch, Jesus, oh, mercy, yuck, etc. – whose defining features are the infrequency with which they combine with other words to form phrases, their loose connection to other elements in clauses, and their tendency to express emotive meaning. These features separate English interjections from the language's other lexical categories, such as nouns and verbs. Though English interjections, like interjections in general, are often overlooked in descriptions of the language, English grammars do offer minimal descriptions of the category.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Goodman, Judith C., Hrsg. Nusbaum, Howard C., Hrsg. (1994). The development of speech perception : the transition from speech sounds to spoken words. MIT Press. ISBN   0262071541. OCLC   832321590.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. 1 2 3 Shi, Rushen (2013-11-06). "Functional Morphemes and Early Language Acquisition". Child Development Perspectives. 8 (1): 6–11. doi:10.1111/cdep.12052. ISSN   1750-8592.
  3. ↑ Shi, Rushen Université du Québec à Montréal (University of Quebec at Montreal) Cutler, Anne University of Western Sydney Werker, Janet Feldman, 1951- University of British Columbia Cruickshank, Marisa College of Arts MARCS Auditory Laboratories (2006). Frequency and form as determinants of functor sensitivity in English-acquiring infants. U.S.A. Acoustical Society of America. OCLC   822779346.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  4. ↑ Shafer, Valerie L.; Shucard, David W.; Shucard, Janet L.; Gerken, LouAnn (August 1998). "An Electrophysiological Study of Infants' Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of English Speech". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 41 (4): 874–886. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4104.874. ISSN   1092-4388. PMID   9712134.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Shi, Rushen; Lepage, Mélanie (May 2008). "The effect of functional morphemes on word segmentation in preverbal infants". Developmental Science. 11 (3): 407–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00685.x. ISSN   1363-755X. PMID   18466374.
  6. ↑ Shi, Rushen; Lepage, Melanie; Gauthier, Bruno; Marquis, Alexandra (May 2006). "Frequency factor in the segmentation of function words in French‐learning infants". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 119 (5): 3420. Bibcode:2006ASAJ..119.3420S. doi:10.1121/1.4808930. ISSN   0001-4966.
  7. ↑ Höhle, Barbara; Weissenborn, Jürgen (1999), "2. Discovering Grammar: Prosodic and Morpho-Syntactic Aspects of Rule Formation in First Language Acquisition", Learning, DE GRUYTER, doi:10.1515/9783110803488.37, ISBN   9783110803488
  8. ↑ Houston, Derek M.; Jusczyk, Peter W.; Kuijpers, Cecile; Coolen, Riet; Cutler, Anne (September 2000). "Cross-language word segmentation by 9-month-olds". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 7 (3): 504–509. doi:10.3758/bf03214363. hdl: 11858/00-001M-0000-0013-3797-4 . ISSN   1069-9384. PMID   11082857. S2CID   38974103.
  9. 1 2 3 Lee, Daniel K.; Fedorenko, Evelina; Simon, Mirela V.; Curry, William T.; Nahed, Brian V.; Cahill, Dan P.; Williams, Ziv M. (2018-05-14). "Neural encoding and production of functional morphemes in the posterior temporal lobe". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 1877. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.1877L. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04235-3. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   5951905 . PMID   29760465.
  10. ↑ Pinker, Steven, 1954- (1996). Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press. ISBN   0674510534. OCLC   469365166.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  11. ↑ Christophe, Anne; Nespor, Marina; Guasti, Maria Teresa; Van Ooyen, Brit (April 2003). "Prosodic structure and syntactic acquisition: the case of the head-direction parameter". Developmental Science. 6 (2): 211–220. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00273. ISSN   1363-755X.
  12. ↑ Bernal, Savita; Lidz, Jeffrey; Millotte, Séverine; Christophe, Anne (2007-08-30). "Syntax Constrains the Acquisition of Verb Meaning". Language Learning and Development. 3 (4): 325–341. doi:10.1080/15475440701542609. ISSN   1547-5441. S2CID   12746804.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.