GROW model

Last updated August 09, 2024

The GROW model (or process) is a simple method for goal setting and problem solving. It was developed in the United Kingdom and has been used extensively in corporate coaching from the late 1980s and 1990s.

Stages of GROW

There are a number of different versions of the GROW model.^[1] The following table presents one view of the stages but there are others.^[1] The "O" in this version has two meanings.

G	Goal	The Goal is the end point, where the client wants to be. The goal has to be defined in such a way that it is very clear to the client when they have achieved it.
R	Reality	The current Reality is where the client is now. What are the issues, the baseline, and how far away is the client from their goal?
O	Obstacles	There will be Obstacles stopping the client getting from where they are now to where they want to go. If there were no Obstacles the client would already have reached their goal.
O	Options	Once Obstacles have been identified, the client needs to find ways of dealing with them if they are to make progress. These are the Options.
W	Way Forward	The Options then need to be converted into action steps which will take the client to their goal. These are the Way Forward. The "W" of GROW can also include When and by Whom and the Will (or intention or commitment) to do it.^[1]

As with many simple principles, any user of GROW can apply a great deal of skill and knowledge at each stage but the basic process remains as written above. There are numerous questions which the coach could use at any point and part of the skill of the coach is to know which questions to use and how much detail to uncover.^[2]

Example

The following is a very simple example of using the GROW model to achieve a goal. This example deals with weight loss. If the client wants: "To bring my weight down to 120 pounds in three months and keep it down", that is their Goal. The more heartfelt and personal, the more meaningful the goal is to the person and the more likely they will be to commit to and achieve the goal.

The GROW approach would then be to establish the Reality by stating what their weight is now. The coach would then ask awareness questions to deepen understanding of what is happening when the client tries to lose weight, thus identifying the Obstacles. These questions could include:

When you have been able to lose weight—what made the difference?
What is the difference between the times you are able to keep weight off and the times when you put it on again?
What would have to change for you to be sure you could lose the weight and keep it off?

If the client genuinely answers these questions they will discover new information about what works and does not work for them in terms of weight loss, and create some potential for change. It then becomes possible to create some strategies or Options which get around the Obstacles. These could include looking at which diets or exercise regimes work best, or finding a specific type of support. Once the client knows the strategies that are likely to work they can establish a Way Forward which involves taking action steps. This is where they commit to what they will do in the short term to put the strategies into effect. For instance, one action might be asking a particular person for support, and another might be to buy a different selection of foods.

GROW neatly highlights the nature of a problem for coaching purposes. In order for a problem to exist in coaching terms there has to be two elements present. Firstly there has to be something that the client is trying to achieve—the Goal. Then there has to be something stopping them achieve that goal—the Obstacle(s). Using GROW automatically breaks a problem down into these component parts.

The same principles can be applied whatever goal or problem the client has. GROW can be used on technical problems, issues regarding processes, strategy questions, interpersonal issues and many more. The model can also be used by a group who are all working on the same problem or goal.

History

In a 2009 article,^[3] John Whitmore claimed that Max Landsberg coined the name GROW during a conversation with Graham Alexander and that Whitmore was the first to publish it in the 1992 first edition of his book Coaching for Performance.^[4] Landsberg also published it a few years later in the 1996 first edition of his book The Tao of Coaching.^[5] Elsewhere Whitmore said that the model had been in use for some time before it was given the name GROW.^[6] Alan Fine's 2010 book You Already Know How to Be Great claimed that Fine had codeveloped the model with Whitmore and Alexander.^[7] Other (later) similar models include collaborative helping maps in family therapy ^[8] and Gabriele Oettingen's WOOP model.^[9]

The GROW principle and the Inner Game

GROW was influenced by the Inner Game method developed by Timothy Gallwey.^[10] Gallwey was a tennis coach who noticed that he could often see what players were doing incorrectly but that simply telling them what they should be doing did not bring about lasting change.

The parallel between Gallwey's Inner Game method and the GROW method can be illustrated by the example of players who do not keep their eyes on the ball. Some coaches have previously given instructions such as: "Keep your eye on the ball" to try to correct this. The problem with this sort of instruction is that a player will be able to follow it for a short while but may be unable to keep it in mind in the long term. So one day, instead of giving an instruction, Gallwey asked players to say "bounce" out loud when the ball bounced and "hit" out loud when they hit the ball.

The result was that the players started to improve without a lot of effort because they were keeping their eyes on the ball. But because of the way the instruction was given they did not have a voice in their heads saying "I must keep my eye on the ball." Instead they were playing a simple game while they were playing tennis. Once Gallwey saw how play could be improved in this way, he stopped giving instructions and started asking questions that would help players discover for themselves what worked and what needed to change.

The GROW method is similar. For example, the first stage in the learning process would be to set a target which a player wants to achieve. If a player wanted to improve their first serve Gallwey would ask how many first serves out of ten they would like to get in. This is the Goal. The Reality would be defined by asking the player to serve 10 balls and seeing how many first serves went in.

Gallwey would then ask awareness-raising questions such as "What do you notice you are doing differently when the ball goes in or out?" This question would enable players to discover for themselves what was changing about their mind and body when the serve went in or out. They had then defined their Obstacles and Options. They therefore learned for themselves what had to change in order to meet their serving targets and they had a clear Way Forward.

The originators of both the Inner Game method and the GROW method suggested that many individuals were struggling to achieve goals because they were not learning from experience and were not aware of the available knowledge that would help them.

Limitations

Jonathan Passmore and Stefan Cantore suggested in 2012 that one "argument against behavioural-based approaches such as GROW is that their goal nature excludes the potential to explore philosophical aspects of life. Thus GROW may be suited to working in goal-directed areas of sports or business, but may be less well suited to careers conversations, person–role fit or life-coaching conversations where other approaches such as the transpersonal or existential approaches may be more helpful."^[11] See also Whitmore, Kauffman & David (2013) for a response to this criticism suggesting that GROW has evolved to include transpersonal goals.

Notes

1 2 3 Published versions of GROW include, for example: Goal, Reality, Options, Wrap-up (Masciarelli 2000 , p. 135, Landsberg 2003 , pp. 30–31); Goal, Reality, Options, Wrap-up/Way forward (Alexander 2010 , pp. 83–86); Goal oriented, Reality, Options, Way forward (Stamatis 2001 , p. 85); Goal, Reality, Options, Way forward (Scales 2008 , pp. 144–145, Fine & Merrill 2010); Goal setting, Reality, Obstacles and Options, Way forward (Griffiths & Kaday 2004 , pp. 19–27, Bennett & Bush 2013 , pp. 65–66); Goals, Reality, Options, Will (Whitmore, Kauffman & David 2013 , p. 245, Gorell 2013 , pp. 74–76); Goal, Reality, Options, Will to act (Parsloe & Wray 2000 , pp. 67–68); Goal setting, Reality checking, Options, What is to be done & When & by Whom & the Will to do it (Whitmore 2009a , p. 55)
↑ Questions that can be used at each stage can be found in a number of texts, for example: Landsberg 2003 , pp. 108–109; Whitmore 2009a , pp. 58–92; Fine & Merrill 2010 , pp. 60–61; Grant 2011 , p. 120; McCarthy 2014
↑ Whitmore 2009b
↑ Whitmore 2009a
↑ Landsberg 2003
↑ Whitmore, Kauffman & David 2013
↑ Fine & Merrill 2010
↑ Madson 2011
↑ Oettingen 2014
↑ Parsloe & Wray 2000 , p. 67: "The GROW technique has its origins in sports coaches who have been influenced by Tim Gallwey's book The Inner Game of Tennis (1974). The technique relies heavily on using skilful questions and following a clear structure."
↑ Passmore & Cantore 2012 , p. 22

Related Research Articles

Coaching is a form of development in which an experienced person, called a coach, supports a learner or client in achieving a specific personal or professional goal by providing training and guidance. The learner is sometimes called a coachee. Occasionally, coaching may mean an informal relationship between two people, of whom one has more experience and expertise than the other and offers advice and guidance as the latter learns; but coaching differs from mentoring by focusing on specific tasks or objectives, as opposed to more general goals or overall development.

Organization development (OD) is the study and implementation of practices, systems, and techniques that affect organizational change. The goal of which is to modify a group's/organization's performance and/or culture. The anizational changes are typically initiated by the group's stakeholders. OD emerged from human relations studies in the 1930s, during which psychologists realized that organizational structures and processes influence worker behavior and motivation.

Appreciative inquiry (AI) is a model that seeks to engage stakeholders in self-determined change. According to Gervase Bushe, professor of leadership and organization development at the Beedie School of Business and a researcher on the topic, "AI revolutionized the field of organization development and was a precursor to the rise of positive organization studies and the strengths based movement in American management." It was developed at Case Western Reserve University's department of organizational behavior, starting with a 1987 article by David Cooperrider and Suresh Srivastva. They felt that the overuse of problem solving hampered any kind of social improvement, and what was needed were new methods of inquiry that would help generate new ideas and models for how to organize.

Reality therapy (RT) is an approach to psychotherapy and counseling developed by William Glasser in the 1960s. It differs from conventional psychiatry, psychoanalysis and medical model schools of psychotherapy in that it focuses on what Glasser calls "psychiatry's three Rs" – realism, responsibility, and right-and-wrong – rather than mental disorders. Reality therapy maintains that most people suffer from socially universal human conditions rather than individual mental illnesses, and that failure to attain basic needs leads to a person's behavior moving away from the norm. Since fulfilling essential needs is part of a person's present life, reality therapy does not concern itself with a person's past. Neither does this type of therapy deal with unconscious mental processes.

Problem solving is the process of achieving a goal by overcoming obstacles, a frequent part of most activities. Problems in need of solutions range from simple personal tasks to complex issues in business and technical fields. The former is an example of simple problem solving (SPS) addressing one issue, whereas the latter is complex problem solving (CPS) with multiple interrelated obstacles. Another classification of problem-solving tasks is into well-defined problems with specific obstacles and goals, and ill-defined problems in which the current situation is troublesome but it is not clear what kind of resolution to aim for. Similarly, one may distinguish formal or fact-based problems requiring psychometric intelligence, versus socio-emotional problems which depend on the changeable emotions of individuals or groups, such as tactful behavior, fashion, or gift choices.

The Internal Family Systems Model (IFS) is an integrative approach to individual psychotherapy developed by Richard C. Schwartz in the 1980s. It combines systems thinking with the view that the mind is made up of relatively discrete subpersonalities, each with its own unique viewpoint and qualities. IFS uses systems psychology, particularly as developed for family therapy, to understand how these collections of subpersonalities are organized.

Motivational interviewing (MI) is a counseling approach developed in part by clinical psychologists William R. Miller and Stephen Rollnick. It is a directive, client-centered counseling style for eliciting behavior change by helping clients to explore and resolve ambivalence. Compared with non-directive counseling, it is more focused and goal-directed, and departs from traditional Rogerian client-centered therapy through this use of direction, in which therapists attempt to influence clients to consider making changes, rather than engaging in non-directive therapeutic exploration. The examination and resolution of ambivalence is a central purpose, and the counselor is intentionally directive in pursuing this goal. MI is most centrally defined not by technique but by its spirit as a facilitative style for interpersonal relationship.

Clean language is a technique primarily used in counseling, psychotherapy and coaching but now also used in education, business, organisational change and health. It has been applied as a research interview technique called clean language interviewing.

Alan Fine is an author, executive coach, consultant, and speaker. Fine began his career as a tennis coach in the United Kingdom. In the late 1970s he worked with Graham Alexander and Sir John Whitmore using Timothy Gallwey’s Inner Game theory as part of their coaching process. An outcome of their work was the development of the GROW model.

Graphic facilitation is the use of a combination of graphics such as diagrams, pictures, symbols, and writing to lead people toward a goal in meetings, seminars, workshops and conferences. The graphics are usually drawn by hand, by a person called a graphic facilitator, who may create the graphics in real time during the event and may work alone or together with another person called a facilitator who aids the discussion.

A goal or objective is an idea of the future or desired result that a person or a group of people envision, plan, and commit to achieve. People endeavour to reach goals within a finite time by setting deadlines.

Health coaching is the use of evidence-based skillful conversation, clinical interventions and strategies to actively and safely engage client/patients in health behavior change. Health coaches are certified or credentialed to safely guide clients and patients who may have chronic conditions or those at moderate to high risk for chronic conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Whitmore (racing driver)</span> British racing driver (1937–2017)

Sir John Henry Douglas Whitmore, 2nd Baronet was a pioneer of the executive coaching industry, an author and British racing driver.

Common factors theory, a theory guiding some research in clinical psychology and counseling psychology, proposes that different approaches and evidence-based practices in psychotherapy and counseling share common factors that account for much of the effectiveness of a psychological treatment. This is in contrast to the view that the effectiveness of psychotherapy and counseling is best explained by specific or unique factors that are suited to treatment of particular problems.

Double-loop learning entails the modification of goals or decision-making rules in the light of experience. The first loop uses the goals or decision-making rules, the second loop enables their modification, hence "double-loop". Double-loop learning recognises that the way a problem is defined and solved can be a source of the problem. This type of learning can be useful in organizational learning since it can drive creativity and innovation, going beyond adapting to change to anticipating or being ahead of change.

Recovery coaching is a form of strengths-based support for people with addictions or in recovery from alcohol, other drugs, codependency, or other addictive behaviors. There are multiple models, with some programs using self-identified peers who draw from their own lived experience with substance use and recovery and some utilizing people who have no lived experience but some training in support, depending on local standards and availability. They help clients find ways to stop addiction (abstinence) or reduce harm associated with addictive behaviors. These coaches can help a client find resources for harm reduction, detox, treatment, family support and education, local or online support groups; or help a client create a change plan to recover on their own.

A decisional balance sheet or decision balance sheet is a tabular method for representing the pros and cons of different choices and for helping someone decide what to do in a certain circumstance. It is often used in working with ambivalence in people who are engaged in behaviours that are harmful to their health, as part of psychological approaches such as those based on the transtheoretical model of change, and in certain circumstances in motivational interviewing.

Problem structuring methods (PSMs) are a group of techniques used to model or to map the nature or structure of a situation or state of affairs that some people want to change. PSMs are usually used by a group of people in collaboration to create a consensus about, or at least to facilitate negotiations about, what needs to change. Some widely adopted PSMs include

Coaching psychology is a field of applied psychology that applies psychological theories and concepts to the practice of coaching. Its aim is to increase performance, self-actualization, achievement and well-being in individuals, teams and organisations by utilising evidence-based methods grounded in scientific research. Coaching psychology is influenced by theories in various psychological fields, such as humanistic psychology, positive psychology, learning theory and social psychology.

References

Alexander, Graham (2010) [2006]. "Behavioural coaching—the GROW model". In Passmore, Jonathan (ed.). Excellence in coaching: the industry guide (2nd ed.). London; Philadelphia: Kogan Page. pp. 83–93. ISBN 9780749456672. OCLC 521754202.
Bennett, John L.; Bush, Mary Wayne (2013). Coaching for change. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203140970. ISBN 9780415897815. OCLC 758394652.
Fine, Alan; Merrill, Rebecca R. (2010). You already know how to be great: a simple way to remove interference and unlock your greatest potential . New York: Portfolio Penguin. ISBN 9781591843559. OCLC 555648015.
Gorell, Ro (2013). "GROW as a process". Group coaching: a practical guide to optimising collective talent in any organization. London; Philadelphia: Kogan Page. pp. 74–75. ISBN 9780749467593. OCLC 817579553.
Grant, Anthony M. (December 2011). "Is it time to REGROW the GROW model? Issues related to teaching coaching session structures". The Coaching Psychologist. 7 (2): 118–126. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.453.6410 .
Griffiths, Bob; Kaday, Chris (2004). Grow your own carrot: motivate yourself to success. London: Hodder and Stoughton. ISBN 9780340862858. OCLC 60960499.
Landsberg, Max (2003) [1996]. The tao of coaching: boost your effectiveness at work by inspiring and developing those around you . London: Profile Books. ISBN 9781861976505. OCLC 223636717.
Madson, William C. (December 2011). "Collaborative helping maps: a tool to guide thinking and action in family-centered services" (PDF). Family Process . 50 (4): 529–543. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01369.x. PMID 22145724.
Masciarelli, James P. (2000). "The coaching moment". PowerSkills: building top-level relationships for bottom-line results . Gloucester, MA: Nimbus Press. pp. 134–135. ISBN 9780967711119. OCLC 45136779.
McCarthy, Dan (May 2014). "70 awesome coaching questions using the GROW model". About.com. Archived from the original on 10 July 2014. Retrieved 14 September 2014.
Oettingen, Gabriele (2014). "The magic of WOOP". Rethinking positive thinking: inside the new science of motivation. New York: Current. pp. 118–140. ISBN 9781591846871. OCLC 881498635.
Parsloe, Eric; Wray, Monika Jamieson (2000). Coaching and mentoring: practical methods to improve learning. London: Kogan Page. ISBN 9780749431181. OCLC 44058686.
Passmore, Jonathan; Cantore, Stefan (2012). "Helping others to set goals: the GROW model". Top business psychology models: 50 transforming ideas for leaders, consultants, and coaches. London; Philadelphia: Kogan Page. pp. 20–23. ISBN 9780749464653. OCLC 779740299.
Scales, Peter (2008). Teaching in the lifelong learning sector. Maidenhead; New York: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press. ISBN 9780335222391. OCLC 179805428.
Stamatis, D. H. (2001). Six sigma and beyond: foundations of excellent performance. Vol. 1. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press. ISBN 1574443119. OCLC 47100858.
Whitmore, John (2009a) [1992]. Coaching for performance: GROWing human potential and purpose: the principles and practice of coaching and leadership. People skills for professionals (4th ed.). Boston: Nicholas Brealey. ISBN 9781857885354. OCLC 314840903. The 5th edition was published in 2017: ISBN 9781473658127. OCLC 1004819121.
Whitmore, John (2009b). "The impact of the Inner Game and Sir John Whitmore on coaching: a commentary" (PDF). Annual Review of High Performance Coaching and Consulting. 4 (2 Suppl): 23–28. doi:10.1260/ijssc.4.suppl-2.671q532j757771rl. S2CID 197652898. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-07-22.
Whitmore, John; Kauffman, Carol; David, Susan A. (2013). "GROW grows up: from winning the game to pursuing transpersonal goals". In David, Susan A.; Clutterbuck, David; Megginson, David (eds.). Beyond goals: effective strategies for coaching and mentoring. Farnham, Surrey: Gower Publishing Limited. pp. 245–260. doi:10.4324/9781315569208. ISBN 9781409418511. OCLC 828416668.