The gender pension gap (also known as the sex pension gap) is the percentage difference in pension income between women and men. It is often calculated as the difference between the average man's pension and the average woman's pension, expressed as a percentage of the man's. The gap averages 26% across OECD countries. [1]
Margaret Franklin, the President and CEO of the Chartered Financial Analysts Institute highlighted in 2021 that "The gender gap in retirement benefits does not grab headlines in the same manner as the pay gap, yet the issue remains no less urgent. And it needs fixing before even more women face poverty in retirement". [2]
Analysis by Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index (MCGPI) highlighted that there was no single cause of the gap and all regions have significant gender differences in the level of retirement income. [3]
In the UK there is no official government assessment of the size of the pension gap, nor policies specifically to address it. Estimates suggest that the gap increased to 37.9% in 2019–20, which is more than twice the size of the gender pay gap (15.5%). [4] [5] Women in retirement have 72% lower pension income than men [6] The average pension pot of a woman in the UK at retirement (£10,000) is less than half that of a man (£21,000). [7] [8]
The gender pension gap is linked to the gender pay gap because it is partially caused by cumulative impact over time of women earning less than men, but it is particularly disadvantageous because women can take very little action to rectify it. Although it is illegal to pay women unfairly, there are many societal and structural conditions which cause the pay and pension gaps to remain and grow. [7] [9] The pension gap is particularly stark in areas of work which are traditionally female dominated. [7] Research using data from Legal and General pension scheme members in the UK showed a typical gender pension gap of 56% at retirement. [9] The gap impacts single women (and single mothers) more than those who are married . [10]
European data (for 27 EU countries) indicates that the sex pension gap is most marked in Luxembourg, where women received 44% less pension, followed by Malta and the Netherlands (both 40%), [11] Cyprus (39%), Austria (37%) and Germany (36%). [12] [13] Japan has a gap of 50% and Canada's gap is around 22%. [14]
A number of structural, cultural and behavioural factors contribute to the pensions gap, including:
The United Kingdom (UK) state pension was awarded at 65 years of age for men and 60 years for women until the 1995 Pensions Act which was to phase in a 'balance' to move women's pension age to equal that of men. [24] The option to move men to 60 or to choose another age between the two was not taken up. The change was to be phased in over a ten-year period but the timeline was accelerated in the 2011 Pensions Act, [25] which was said to have disadvantaged 2.6million [26] women born between April 1951 and 1960, some having to wait a further 6 years before being able to claim their pension. [27]
A protest group Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) was created in 2015, and an online petition of 118,000 signatures asked Parliament for a formal debate on the matter, [28] which took place in February 2016. [29] Further protests took place [30] and a crowd-funded legal action was taken contending the inequality of treatment of this cohort. [31] Events marking the 2018 VOTE100 women's marches to mark the centenary of (some) women being given the franchise in the UK and International Women's Day; pension justice was raised among other inequalities and issues affecting only women, in a UK Parliamentary debate again. [32] [33] There were contrary views on the merits of the argument that women had been unfairly treated. [34]
The issue of pension gaps, and the impact on the 1950s women featured in election campaigns in 2019. [35] [36] Another women's action group #backto60 [37] took the view that full compensation for the women affected was appropriate, rather than a limited 'compensation' for the lack of government communications, and their crowd-funded court case led by Michael Mansfield, QC, was not finally supported by the Supreme Court in 2021, for the right of appeal. [38] However the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman found and reported in July 2021, based on six 'test cases' that there was 'maladministration' in the communications to women about their changes in state pension, by the relevant department of UK government (DWP). [39] The Ombudsman updated the public information into its enquiry in February 2022, indicating that it was now awaiting evidence from the Department for Work and Pensions due by the end of March 2022, without which it cannot begin the 'stage two of..investigation and considering whether the failings.. identified led to an injustice for the complainants.' [40] Sixty-four members of Parliament have backed a motion [41] by Labour MP, Ian Byrne calling for full restitution (which supports #backto60 and 'We Paid In You Pay Out' [42] groups' view), but other protest groups (WASPI) and the official All Party Parliamentary Group on State Pension Inequality for Women (APPG) propose a lesser compensation. [43]
A wider review of the pension gap in the context of the lack of legislative implementation by successive UK governments, of the United Nations CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women into UK law, held a people's tribunal in 2021, and took evidence which recommended that the UK should introduce a women's bill of rights. [44]
Juan Yermo, Chief of Staff to the OECD Secretary-General, has said, "Policy makers need to account for and address the factors that can lead to gender inequalities, and should strive to design gender-neutral retirement savings arrangements.". [1] In the UK, the Prospect Union have called for the government to tackle the gender pension gap through reform of automatic enrollment, additional state pension credit and affordable childcare and changes to the tax system. [4] Researchers who analyse data about the pension gap over time highlight that current gaps in pension income reflect labour markets and pension contribution patterns from many years ago, people working now may have a different experience when they reach retirement. [17] The gap increased during the years of the COVID-19 pandemic [5] but the new experiments with alternative styles of working may offer employers opportunities to implement more flexible policies that will encourage more women to remain in the workforce. [2]
A pension is a fund into which amounts are paid regularly during an individual's working career, and from which periodic payments are made to support the person's retirement from work. A pension may be:
In economics, income distribution covers how a country's total GDP is distributed amongst its population. Economic theory and economic policy have long seen income and its distribution as a central concern. Unequal distribution of income causes economic inequality which is a concern in almost all countries around the world.
This article lists the statutory retirement age in different countries. In some contexts, the retirement age is the age at which a person is expected or required to cease work. It is usually the age at which such a person may be entitled to receive superannuation or other government benefits, like a state pension.
The State Pension is an existing welfare benefit that forms part of the United Kingdom Government's pension arrangements. Benefits vary depending on the age of the individual and their contribution record. Currently anyone can make a claim, provided they have a minimum number of qualifying years of contributions.
The pensions crisis or pensions timebomb is the predicted difficulty in paying for corporate or government employment retirement pensions in various countries, due to a difference between pension obligations and the resources set aside to fund them. The basic difficulty of the pension problem is that institutions must be sustained over far longer than the political planning horizon. Shifting demographics are causing a lower ratio of workers per retiree; contributing factors include retirees living longer, and lower birth rates. An international comparison of pension institution by countries is important to solve the pension crisis problem. There is significant debate regarding the magnitude and importance of the problem, as well as the solutions. One aspect and challenge of the "Pension timebomb" is that several countries' governments have a constitutional obligation to provide public services to its citizens, but the funding of these programs, such as healthcare are at a lack of funding, especially after the 2008 recession and the strain caused on the dependency ratio by an ageing population and a shrinking workforce, which increases costs of elderly care.
The gender pay gap in the United States is a measure comparing the earnings of men and women in the workforce. The average female annual earnings is around 80% of the average male's. When variables such as hours worked, occupations chosen, and education and job experience are controlled for, the gap diminishes with females earning 95% as much as males. The exact figure varies because different organizations use different methodologies to calculate the gap. The gap varies depending on industry and is influenced by factors such as race and age. The causes of the gender pay gap are debated, but popular explanations include the "motherhood penalty," hours worked, occupation chosen, willingness to negotiate salary, and gender bias.
The Italian welfare state is based partly upon the corporatist-conservative model and partly upon the universal welfare model.
Frozen state pensions is the practice of the British Government of "freezing" UK State Pensions,, for pensioners who live in the majority of other countries, apart from the European Community countries and other countries with reciprocal agreements with the UK.
Gender inequality is the social phenomenon in which people are not treated equally on the basis of gender. This inequality can be caused by gender discrimination or sexism. The treatment may arise from distinctions regarding biology, psychology, or cultural norms prevalent in the society. Some of these distinctions are empirically grounded, while others appear to be social constructs. While current policies around the world cause inequality among individuals, it is women who are most affected. Gender inequality weakens women in many areas such as health, education, and business life. Studies show the different experiences of genders across many domains including education, life expectancy, personality, interests, family life, careers, and political affiliation. Gender inequality is experienced differently across different cultures.
Median household disposable income in the UK was £29,400 in the financial year ending (FYE) 2019, up 1.4% (£400) compared with growth over recent years; median income grew by an average of 0.7% per year between FYE 2017 and FYE 2019, compared with 2.8% between FYE 2013 and FYE 2017.
Julie Elliott is a British Labour Party politician, who served as Member of Parliament (MP) for Sunderland Central from 2010 to 2024. Elliott served as Shadow Minister for Energy and Climate Change from October 2013 to September 2015, with specific responsibility for renewable energy, the Green Investment Bank, and skills and supply chain issues. She has also served as chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Rugby Union and vice-chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on State Pension Inequality for Women. Elliott was re-elected for the Labour Party in Sunderland Central at the 2019 general election with a majority of 2,964.
Pensions in Spain consist of a mandatory state pension scheme, and voluntary company and individual pension provision.
In South Korea, gender inequality is derived from deeply rooted patriarchal ideologies with specifically defined gender-roles. While it remains especially prevalent in South Korea's economy and politics, gender inequality has decreased in healthcare and education.
Gender inequality in the United States has been diminishing throughout its history and significant advancements towards equality have been made beginning mostly in the early 1900s. However, despite this progress, gender inequality in the United States continues to persist in many forms, including the disparity in women's political representation and participation, occupational segregation, and the unequal distribution of household labor. The alleviation of gender inequality has been the goal of several major pieces of legislation since 1920 and continues to the present day. As of 2021, the World Economic Forum ranks the United States 30th in terms of gender equality out of 149 countries.
The gender pay gap or gender wage gap is the average difference between the remuneration for men and women who are employed. Women are generally found to be paid less than men. There are two distinct measurements of the pay gap: non-adjusted versus adjusted pay gap. The latter typically takes into account differences in hours worked, occupations chosen, education and job experience. In other words, the adjusted values represent how much women and men make for the same work, while the non-adjusted values represent how much the average man and woman make in total. In the United States, for example, the non-adjusted average woman's annual salary is 79–83% of the average man's salary, compared to 95–99% for the adjusted average salary. The reasons for the gap link to legal, social and economic factors. These include having children, parental leave, gender discrimination and gender norms. Additionally, the consequences of the gender pay gap surpass individual grievances, leading to reduced economic output, lower pensions for women, and fewer learning opportunities.
Women in Iceland generally enjoy good gender equality. As of 2018, 88% of working-age women were employed, 65% of students attending university were female, and 41% of members of parliament were women. Nevertheless, women still earn about 14% less than men, though these statistics do not take into account the hours worked, over-time, and choices of employment. Iceland has the world's highest proportion of women in the labour market and significant child care allocations for working women. It has gender neutral parental leave, with a quota for each parent, and a transferable part.
Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) is a voluntary UK-based organisation founded in 2015 that campaigns against the way in which the state pension age for men and women was equalised. They call for the millions of women affected by the change to receive compensation.
Even in the modern era, gender inequality remains an issue in Japan. In 2015, the country had a per-capita income of US$38,883, ranking 22nd of the 188 countries, and No. 18 in the Human Development Index. In the 2019 Gender Inequality Index report, it was ranked 17th out of the participating 162 countries, ahead of Germany, the UK and the US, performing especially well on the reproductive health and higher education attainment indices. Despite this, gender inequality still exists in Japan due to the persistence of gender norms in Japanese society rooted in traditional religious values and government reforms. Gender-based inequality manifests in various aspects from the family, or ie, to political representation, to education, playing particular roles in employment opportunities and income, and occurs largely as a result of defined roles in traditional and modern Japanese society. Inequality also lies within divorce of heterosexual couples and the marriage of same sex couples due to both a lack of protective divorce laws and the presence of restrictive marriage laws. In consequence to these traditional gender roles, self-rated health surveys show variances in reported poor health, population decline, reinforced gendered education and social expectations, and inequalities in the LGBTQ+ community.
According to data from 2010, low-income earners make up 37.8% of South Korea's labour force. Conversely, the highest income earners make up 1.4% of the labour force.
Gender parity is a statistical measure used to describe ratios between men and women, or boys and girls, in a given population. Gender parity may refer to the proportionate representation of men and women in a given group, also referred to as sex ratio, or it may mean the ratio between any quantifiable indicator among men against the same indicator among women.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)