German sentence structure

Last updated

German sentence structure is the structure to which the German language adheres. German is an OV (Object-Verb) language. [1] Additionally, German, like all west Germanic languages except English, uses V2 word order, though only in independent clauses. In dependent clauses, the finite verb is placed last.

Contents

Independent clauses

Declarative sentences

Declarative sentences use V2 (verb in the second position) word order: the finite verb is preceded by one and only one constituent (unlike in English, this need not be the subject); in Germanic tradition, the position occupied by this constituent is referred to as the prefield (Vorfeld). Coordinating conjunctions like und ('and') or aber ('but') precede both the prefield and the finite verb, and so do topicalised elements (similarly to "that" in English phrases such as "that I don't know"). The prefield is often used to convey emphasis.

Ich sehe den Baum.

ich

I.NOM

seh-e

see.PRS-1SG

den

the.ACC.SG.M

Baum

tree.ACC.SG

ich seh-e den Baum

I.NOM see.PRS-1SG the.ACC.SG.M tree.ACC.SG

'I see the tree.'

Den Baum sehe ich.

den

the.ACC.SG.M

Baum

tree.ACC.SG

seh-e

see.PRS-1SG

ich

I.NOM

den Baum seh-e ich

the.ACC.SG.M tree.ACC.SG see.PRS-1SG I.NOM

'I see the tree.'

Du siehst den Fluss, und ich sehe den Baum.

du

you.SG

siehst

see.PRS.2SG

den

the.ACC.SG.M

Fluss

river.ACC.SG

und

and

ich

I.NOM

seh-e

see.PRS.1SG

den

the.ACC.SG.M

Baum

tree.ACC.SG

du siehst den Fluss und ich seh-e den Baum

you.SG see.PRS.2SG the.ACC.SG.M river.ACC.SG and I.NOM see.PRS.1SG the.ACC.SG.M tree.ACC.SG

'You see the river, and I see the tree.'

Non-finite verbs as well as separable particles are placed at the end of the sentence:

Der König ist an der Burg angekommen.

der

the.NOM.SG.M

König

king.NOM.SG

ist

be.PRS.3SG

an

at

der

the.DAT.SG.F

Burg

castle.DAT.SG

an=ge-komm-en

on=PST.PTCP1‍-come-PST.PTCP1‍

der König ist an der Burg an=ge-komm-en

the.NOM.SG.M king.NOM.SG be.PRS.3SG at the.DAT.SG.F castle.DAT.SG on=PST.PTCP1-come-PST.PTCP1

'The King has arrived (lit. "is on-come") at the castle.'

Der König kam an der Burg an.

der

the.NOM.SG.M

König

king.NOM.SG

kam

come.PST.3SG

an

at

der

the.DAT.SG.F

Burg

castle.DAT.SG

an

on

der König kam an der Burg an

the.NOM.SG.M king.NOM.SG come.PST.3SG at the.DAT.SG.F castle.DAT.SG on

'The King arrived (lit. "on-came") at the castle.'

Der König wird an der Burg ankommen.

der

the.NOM.SG.M

König

king.NOM.SG

wird

will.PRS.3SG

an

at

der

the.DAT.SG.F

Burg

castle.DAT.SG

an=komm-en

on=come-INF

der König wird an der Burg an=komm-en

the.NOM.SG.M king.NOM.SG will.PRS.3SG at the.DAT.SG.F castle.DAT.SG on=come-INF

'The King will arrive (lit. "will on-come") at the castle.'

In the midfield (the part of the clause between the position of the finite verb and that of the clause-final verb cluster), German word order is highly variable.

Conventional German syntax presents information within a sentence in the following order:[ citation needed ]

  • Wichtigstes (what is the most important thing within the all the elements following the finite verb?)
    • The word da when taking the meaning of "then suddenly" must take the first place. Dann ('then') does so often, but not necessarily; otherwise, the subject of the sentence may take first place.
    • If the verb is the most important, the unconjugated (normally second) part of the separable verb is placed here, but still separated from the conjugated (normally first) part. If the verb is not separable or periphrastical, the infinitive is used.
  • Was ('what?' - the conjugated verb)
    • In this case, a form of tun is inserted for the conjugated verb, as in "Arbeiten tun wir" ("Working, that's what we do").
  • Wer ('who?' - the subject)
  • Wem ('to/for whom' – dative object)
  • Wann ('when' – time)
  • Warum ('why' – reason)
  • Wie ('how' – manner)
  • Wo ('where' – place)
  • Wen ('whom' – accusative object)
  • Wohin/Woher ('to/from where')
  • Verb, nochmal (first part of the separable verb)


Wir gehen am Freitag miteinander ins Kino. Literally, 'We go on Friday together to the movies.'[ dubious discuss ]

Wegen ihres Jahrestages bereiten wir unseren Eltern einen Ausflug nach München vor. Literally, 'Because of their anniversary plan we our parents a trip to Munich.'


In conversational past tense, comparisons can be put after both parts of the verb. So:

Er ist größer gewesen als ich. / Er war größer als ich.

OR

Er ist größer als ich gewesen

'He was greater than me.'

German often structure a sentence according to increasing importance of the phrase towards the conversation. So:

Wir gehen am Donnerstag ins Kino. 'We're going to the movies on Thursday.'

BUT

An welchem Tag gehen wir ins Kino? '(On) What day are we going to the movies?'

Am Donnerstag gehen wir ins Kino. 'On Thursday we're going to the movies.'

OR

Wir gehen am Donnerstag ins Kino. 'We're going on Thursday to the movies.'

In ditransitive sentences, pronouns usually go between the verb and all other elements of the sentence:

Florian gibt mir morgen das Buch. 'Florian is giving me tomorrow the book.'

BUT

Florian gibt es mir morgen. 'Florian is giving it to me tomorrow.'

Inversion

An inversion is used to emphasize an adverbial phrase, a predicative, an object, or an inner verbal phrase in a sentence. The subject phrase, at the beginning of an indicative unstressed sentence, is moved directly behind the conjugated verb, and the component to be emphasized is moved to the beginning of the sentence. The conjugated verb is always the second sentence element in indicative statements.

Example 1:

"Ich fliege schnell." 'I fly fast.' – unstressed
"Schnell fliege ich." 'I fly fast.' – stressed "schnell"/'fast' (i.e., "Fast is how I fly.")

Example 2:

"Du bist wunderschön." 'You are lovely." – unstressed
"Wunderschön bist du." 'You are lovely.' – stressed "wunderschön"/'lovely' (i.e., "Lovely is what you are.")

Example 3:

"Ich bin gelaufen." 'I ran.' – unstressed
"Gelaufen bin ich!" 'I ran!' – stressed "gelaufen"/'ran' (i.e., "Run is what I did!")

Interrogative sentences

Questions are generally divided into yes–no questions and wh-questions.

Specific questions are similar to inverted statements. They begin with a question word, which is followed by the conjugated verb, followed by the subject (if there is one), and then the rest of the sentence.[ citation needed ]

Was machst du jetzt? ("What are you doing now?")
Wer geht ins Kino? ("Who is going to the cinema?" – In this sentence, the interrogative pronoun wer serves as the subject)

Yes–no questions

In yes–no questions, V1 (verb-first) word order is used: the finite verb occupies the first position in the sentence; here, there is no prefield.

Siehst du den Baum?

siehst

see.PRS.2SG

du

you.SG

den

the.ACC.SG.M

Baum

tree.ACC.SG

siehst du den Baum

see.PRS.2SG you.SG the.ACC.SG.M tree.ACC.SG

'Do you see the tree?'

However, conjunctions and topicalised elements still precede the finite verb:

Aber hast du den Baum gesehen?

aber

but

hast

have.PRS.2SG

du

you.SG

den

the.ACC.SG.M

Baum

tree.ACC.SG

ge-seh-en

PST.PTCP1‍-see-PST.PTCP1‍

aber hast du den Baum ge-seh-en

but have.PRS.2SG you.SG the.ACC.SG.M tree.ACC.SG PST.PTCP1-see-PST.PTCP1

'But have you seen the tree?'

Den Baum, hast du den gesehen?

den

the.ACC.SG.M

Baum

tree.ACC.SG

hast

have.PRS.2SG

du

you.SG

den

DEM.ACC.SG.M

ge-seh-en

PST.PTCP1‍-see-PST.PTCP1‍

den Baum hast du den ge-seh-en

the.ACC.SG.M tree.ACC.SG have.PRS.2SG you.SG DEM.ACC.SG.M PST.PTCP1-see-PST.PTCP1

'The tree, have you seen it?'

Wh questions

Wh questions work in much the same way as they do in English. Like English, German also has Wh-movement:

Welchen Baum hast du gesehen?

welchen

INTERR.DET.ACC.SG.M

Baum

tree.ACC.SG

hast

have.PRS.2SG

du

you.SG

ge-seh-en

PST.PTCP1‍-see-PST.PTCP1‍

welchen Baum hast du ge-seh-en

INTERR.DET.ACC.SG.M tree.ACC.SG have.PRS.2SG you.SG PST.PTCP1-see-PST.PTCP1

'What tree have you seen?'

Wohin gehen wir?

wohin

whither

geh-en

go.PRS-1PL

wir

we.NOM

wohin geh-en wir

whither go.PRS-1PL we.NOM

'Where are we going?'

Commands

For commands, the imperative mood is used. Like questions, commands use V1 word order:

Reich(e) mir das Salz!

reich-(e)

pass-IMP.SG

mir

I.DAT

das

the.ACC.SG.N

Salz

salt.ACC.SG

reich-(e) mir das Salz

pass-IMP.SG I.DAT the.ACC.SG.N salt.ACC.SG

'Pass me the salt!'

In contemporary German, the imperative singular ending -e is usually omitted. The second-person-singular pronouns du 'you (sg)' and ihr 'you (pl)' are always omitted, except in highly formal or literary language:

Bringe du mir das Buch!

bring-e

fetch-IMP.SG

du

you.SG

mir

I.DAT

das

the.ACC.SG.N

Buch

book.ACC.SG

bring-e du mir das Buch

fetch-IMP.SG you.SG I.DAT the.ACC.SG.N book.ACC.SG

'Fetch me the book!'

Like in English, nouns or non-finite verb forms can sometimes be used to give commands:

Achtung Stufe!

Achtung

attention.NOM.SG

Stufe

step.NOM.SG

Achtung Stufe

attention.NOM.SG step.NOM.SG

'Mind the step!'

Warm anziehen nicht vergessen!

warm

warm.ADJ

an=zieh-en

on=pull-INF

nicht

not

vergess-en

forget-INF

warm an=zieh-en nicht vergess-en

warm.ADJ on=pull-INF not forget-INF

'Don't forget to dress warmly!'

Dependent clauses

Subordinate clauses use Vfinal word order.

'That' clauses

Using dass 'that':

Ich weiß, dass er hier ist.

Ich

I.NOM

weiß

know.PRS.1SG

dass

that

er

he.NOM

hier

here

ist

be.PRS.3SG

Ich weiß dass er hier ist

I.NOM know.PRS.1SG that he.NOM here be.PRS.3SG

'I know that he's here.'

Wer hat dir erzählt, dass ich nach England ziehen werde?

wer

who.NOM

hat

have.PRS.3SG

dir

you.DAT.SG

erzähl-t

tell.PST.PTCP

dass

that

ich

I.NOM

nach

to

England

England.NOM

zieh-en

move.INF

werd-e

will.PRS.1SG

wer hat dir erzähl-t dass ich nach England zieh-en werd-e

who.NOM have.PRS.3SG you.DAT.SG tell.PST.PTCP that I.NOM to England.NOM move.INF will.PRS.1SG

'Who told you that I'm moving to England?'

Dass zwei größer als eins ist, ist selbstverständlich

dass

that

zwei

two

größer

greater

als

than

eins

one

ist,

be.PRS.3SG

ist

be.PRS.3SG

selbstverständlich

obvious

dass zwei größer als eins ist, ist selbstverständlich

that two greater than one be.PRS.3SG be.PRS.3SG obvious

'That two is greater than one is obvious.'

Clauses headed by a subordinator

Sie schrieb es nieder, sodass sie es nicht vergessen würde.

sie

she.NOM

schrieb

write.PRET.3SG

es

it.ACC

nieder

down

sodass

so.that

sie

she.NOM

es

it.ACC

nicht

not

vergess-en

forget.INF

würd-e

will.SUBJII-3SG

sie schrieb es nieder sodass sie es nicht vergess-en würd-e

she.NOM write.PRET.3SG it.ACC down so.that she.NOM it.ACC not forget.INF will.SUBJII-3SG

'She wrote it down so that she would not forget it.'

Wir sollten uns beeilen, damit wir rechtzeitig ankommen.

wir

we.NOM

soll-t-en

shall-PRET-1PL

uns

we.REFL

beeil-en

hurry-INF

damit

in.order.that

wir

we.NOM

rechtzeitig

in.time

an=komm-en

on=.come-INF

wir soll-t-en uns beeil-en damit wir rechtzeitig an=komm-en

we.NOM shall-PRET-1PL we.REFL hurry-INF in.order.that we.NOM in.time on=.come-INF

'We should hurry so that we arrive in time.'

Ich helfe dir, weil ich dich mag.

ich

I.NOM

helf-e

help.PRS-1SG

dir

you.SG.DAT

weil

because

ich

I.NOM

dich

you.ACC

mag

like.PRS.1SG

ich helf-e dir weil ich dich mag

I.NOM help.PRS-1SG you.SG.DAT because I.NOM you.ACC like.PRS.1SG

'I help you because I like you.'

Relative clauses

Intonation of German restrictive relative clauses Intonation of German restrictive relative clauses.jpg
Intonation of German restrictive relative clauses

There are two varieties of relative clauses. The more common one is based on the definite article der, die, das, but with distinctive forms in the genitive (dessen, deren) and in the dative plural (denen). Historically, this is related to the English that. The second, which is typically used in more literary contexts and used for emphasis, is the relative use of welcher, welche, welches, comparable with English which. As in most Germanic languages, including Old English, both of these varieties inflect according to gender, case and number. They take their gender and number from the noun which they modify, but the case from their function in their own clause.

Der König, der sah den Fluss.

der

the.NOM.SG.M

König

king.NOM.SG

der

REL.NOM.SG.M

sah

see.PST.3SG

den

the.ACC.SG.M

Fluss

river.ACC.SG

der König der sah den Fluss

the.NOM.SG.M king.NOM.SG REL.NOM.SG.M see.PST.3SG the.ACC.SG.M river.ACC.SG

'The king, who saw the river.'

Das Haus, in dem ich wohne, ist sehr alt.

das

the.NOM.SG.N

Haus

house.NOM.SG

in

in

dem

REL.DAT.SG.N

ich

I.NOM

wohne

live.PRS.1SG

ist

be.PRS.3SG

sehr

very

alt

old

das Haus in dem ich wohne ist sehr alt

the.NOM.SG.N house.NOM.SG in REL.DAT.SG.N I.NOM live.PRS.1SG be.PRS.3SG very old

'The house in which I live is very old.'

The relative pronoun dem is neuter singular to agree with Haus, but dative because it follows a preposition in its own clause. On the same basis, it would be possible to substitute the pronoun welchem.

However, German uses the uninflecting was ('what') as a relative pronoun when the antecedent is alles, etwas or nichts ('everything', 'something', 'nothing'.).

Alles, was Jack macht, gelingt ihm.

alles

everything.NOM.SG.N

was

what.ACC.SG

Jack

Jack.NOM

macht

do.PRS.3SG

gelingt

turn out well.PRS.3SG

ihm

3SG.DAT

alles was Jack macht gelingt ihm

everything.NOM.SG.N what.ACC.SG Jack.NOM do.PRS.3SG {turn out well.PRS.3SG} 3SG.DAT

'Everything that Jack does is a success.'

In German, all relative clauses are marked with commas.

Alternatively, particularly in formal registers, participles (both active and passive) can be used to embed relative clauses in adjectival phrases:

Die von ihm in jenem Stil gemalten Bilder sind sehr begehrt.
'The pictures he painted in that style are highly sought after.'
Die Regierung möchte diese im letzten Jahr eher langsam wachsende Industrie weiter fördern.
'The government would like to further promote this industry, which has grown rather slowly over the last year.'

Unlike English, which only permits relatively small participle phrases in adjectival positions (typically just the participle and adverbs), and disallows the use of direct objects for active participles, German sentences of this sort can embed clauses of arbitrary complexity.

Subordinate clauses

A subordinate clause (Nebensatz) is always incorporated in a main clause (or another subordinate clause). Any part of the main clause can be replaced by it, but some conjugated verb must remain. However, subclauses are generally moved to the end of the sentence if it can be done without inconvenience and they do not take the first place because of importance. As for word order, it differs in two things from the main clause:

  1. In general, it begins with a special word, a 'subordinating conjunction' or a relative pronoun, setting it into relation with the main sentence.
  2. The verb is, without separation, sent to the place where the first part of a separable verb would be in a main clause, i.e. at the end of the sentence.
    Ich nehme den früheren Flug, damit ich heute noch ankomme.
    'I'll take the earlier flight so that I arrive even today.'

Question words (in the following example, 'wohin') have the same effect as subordinating conjunctions within a sentence:

Wohin ist er gelaufen?Niemand wusste, wohin er gelaufen ist.

'Where did he run (to)? No one knew where he ran (to).'

Unlike in English, a subordinate or dependent clause is always separated from the independent clause (Hauptsatz) by a comma.


Exceptions:

  1. Final clauses can be replaced by an "um-zu"-infinitive, if the subject is identical. In practice, um behaves as a conjunction, and the infinitive, with a zu, as a conjugated verb, and the subject falls away.
    Wir haben genug Geld, um diese CD zu kaufen. = Wir haben genug Geld, damit wir diese CD kaufen. "We have enough money to/that we buy this CD."
  2. In conditional phrases, the conjunction wenn may be left out in the main clause and the verb put into its place. In this case, so replaces dann in the subordinate clause.
    Hast du genügend Geld, so (no "dann" in this case) kannst du diese CD kaufen. = Wenn du genügend Geld hast, dann kannst du diese CD kaufen. "If you have enough money, then you can buy this CD."
  3. Indirect speech may behave as a subclause in relation to the main clause, but the conjunction (which would be "dass") may be left out and then its word order is as in main clauses.
    Er sagte, er sei mit der Arbeit fertig. = Er sagte, dass er mit der Arbeit fertig sei. = "He said (that) he had finished his work."
  4. Denn, by custom translated into English as for, is in practice an equivalent to weil 'because', but it requires a main-clause word order and may even take a semicolon instead of a comma.
    Er kommt nicht zur Arbeit, denn er ist krank. (He doesn't come to work, for he's ill.) = Er kommt nicht zur Arbeit, weil er krank ist. = "He doesn't come to work because he's ill."
    In some dialects weil has the role which denn has in Standard German. However, this doesn't mean they generally neglect the subclause word order, since other conjunctions meaning the same, i.e. da "as" or even a "deswegen weil" (literally: because of that because) take ordinary subclauses there.
  5. In subordinate clauses that make use of two or more infinitives consecutively (a phenomenon known as Doppelinfinitiv ("double infinitive") with two infinitives), the conjugated verb (generally haben, werden, or a modal verb), comes before (or between) the two (or more) infinitives. Perfect constructions of this type can usually be avoided altogether by using the simple past:
    Er wollte wissen, ob du es hast tun können / tun hast können. = Er wollte wissen, ob du es tun konntest.
    'He wanted to know if you've been able to (could) do it.'
    Ich weiß, dass ich es werde tun müssen / tun werde müssen.
    'I know I'm going to have to do it.'
    Sie hofft, dass sie uns es kann tun helfen / tun kann helfen.
    'She hopes she can help us do it.'

Subordinate sentence structure

Just as in English, a subordinate clause may be used at the beginning or end of a complete expression, so long as it is paired with at least one independent clause. For instance, just as one could say either:

I will go with you, if I can. or If I can, I will go with you.

so can one also say in German:

Ich komme mit, wenn ich kann. or Wenn ich kann, komme ich mit.

In German when the independent clause comes after a subordinate clause, the conjugated verb comes before the subject. This arises from the rule that always places the conjugated verb in a sentence in the second position, even if that puts it ahead of the sentence's subject.

Clauses with dass

Subordinate clauses beginning with dass [thus, so, that] enable the speaker to use statements like nominal phrases or pronouns. These sentences are singular, neuter and either nominative or accusative. For example:

Dass Spinnen keine Insekten sind, ist allgemein bekannt.
'It's well known that spiders are not insects.'
Ich weiß, dass Spinnen keine Insekten sind.Ich weiß das.
'I know that spiders are not insects – I know that.'

Indirect questions with ob

Whereas the word dass indicates that the statement is a fact, ob starts an indirect yes/no question.

Ich weiß nicht, ob ich fliegen soll. ("I don't know whether I should fly.")

Specific indirect question

Relative clauses

The outer nominal phrase the relative clause relates to can be any nominal phrase in any case. The clause begins with a form of the relative pronoun derived from and largely identical to the definite pronoun (der/die/das), or the interrogative pronoun (welchem/welcher/welches), the remaining words are put after it. Using the interrogative pronoun without a specific reason is considered typical for legalese language.

Der Mann, der/welcher seiner Frau den Hund schenkt (nominative subject) ('The man who gives his wife the dog')
Der Hund, den/welchen der Mann seiner Frau schenkt (accusative object) ('The dog which the man gives his wife')
Die Frau, der/welcher der Mann den Hund schenkt (dative object) ('The woman to whom the man gives the dog')
Der Mann, der/welcher ich bin (predicative noun) ('The man I am')

The outer nominal phrase can also be the possessor of a noun inside. The genitive case of a relative pronoun matching the outer nominal phrase in gender and number is used:

Der Mann, dessen Auto auf der Straße parkt ('The man whose car is parked on the street')
Die Person, deren Auto ich kaufe ('The person whose car I am buying')
Das Auto, dessen Fahrer ich helfe ('The car whose driver I am helping')
Die Kinder, deren Lehrer ich kenne ('The children whose teacher I know')

Prepositions/postpositions are attached to these phrases in the relative clause if necessary:

Das Haus, in dem ich lebe ('The house I live in')
Die Person, derentwegen ich hier bin ('The person I am here because of')
Das Haus, durch dessen Tür ich gegangen bin ('The house whose door I came in by')

If the relative pronoun is identical to the definite article several identical forms may follow each other:

Der, der der Frau, der ich schon Honig gegeben hatte, Honig gab, muss mehr Honig kaufen ('The man who gave honey to the woman I had already given honey to, has to buy more honey')

Such constructions are generally avoided by using forms of welch- as relative pronouns:

Der, welcher der Frau, welcher ...

or rather

Derjenige, welcher der Frau, der ich ...

Otherwise, welcher is rarely used (never in the genitive), and without a difference in meaning. If the relative pronoun refers to a thing as yet unknown or a whole sentence and not a part of it, was is used instead, always equivalent here to an English "which":

Der Chef stellte einen Arbeiter ein, was diesen sehr gefreut hat. ('The manager hired a worker, which the latter was very happy about.')

From sentences such as this which is altogether correct, being a locational adverb:

In dem Geschäft, wo (or in dem) man auch Brot kaufen kann, kaufe ich Bier. ('In this shop where you also can buy bread I am buying beer.')

Colloquial usage extends this to other quasi-locational prepositional expressions:

Die Zeit, wo (= in der) wir Rom besucht haben, war sehr schön. ('The time lit. where we visited Rome was really fine.' Regular "in der", literally "in which", would translate to a "when" in English.)

In slang, this extends to all relative clauses:

Der Mann, wo bei Siemens arbeitet, hat an der Technischen Universität studiert. ('The man where works at Siemens's has graduated from the Technical University.')

This form is never used in Bavaria. Southern Germans have constructed a double form "der wo, die wo, das wo" which, however, is almost necessary in the Bavarian dialect. "Wo" may here be replaced by "was", which occurs mostly in the feminine gender.

Adverbial clauses

An adverbial clause begins with a conjunction, defining its relation to the verb or nominal phrase described.

Als ich auf dem Meer segelte ("When/As I was sailing on the sea")

Some examples of conjunctions: als, während, nachdem, weil.

Related Research Articles

Swiss German is any of the Alemannic dialects spoken in the German-speaking part of Switzerland, and in some Alpine communities in Northern Italy bordering Switzerland. Occasionally, the Alemannic dialects spoken in other countries are grouped together with Swiss German as well, especially the dialects of Liechtenstein and Austrian Vorarlberg, which are closely associated to Switzerland's.

In linguistic typology, split ergativity is a feature of certain languages where some constructions use ergative syntax and morphology, but other constructions show another pattern, usually nominative–accusative. The conditions in which ergative constructions are used vary among different languages.

An interrogative word or question word is a function word used to ask a question, such as what, which, when, where, who, whom, whose, why, whether and how. They are sometimes called wh-words, because in English most of them start with wh-. They may be used in both direct questions and in indirect questions. In English and various other languages the same forms are also used as relative pronouns in certain relative clauses and certain adverb clauses. It can also be used as a modal, since question words are more likely to appear in modal sentences, like

In syntax, verb-second (V2) word order is a sentence structure in which the finite verb of a sentence or a clause is placed in the clause's second position, so that the verb is preceded by a single word or group of words.

A cleft sentence is a complex sentence that has a meaning that could be expressed by a simple sentence. Clefts typically put a particular constituent into focus. In spoken language, this focusing is often accompanied by a special intonation.

The dative construction is a grammatical way of constructing a sentence, using the dative case. A sentence is also said to be in dative construction if the subject and the object can switch their places for a given verb, without altering the verb's structure. The latter case is not to be confused with the passive voice, where only the direct object of a sentence becomes the subject of the passive-voiced sentence, and the verb's structure also changes to convey the meaning of the passive voice. The dative construction tends to occur when the verb indicates a state rather than an action.

Kambera, also known as East Sumbanese, is a Malayo-Polynesian language spoken in the Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia. Kambera is a member of Bima-Sumba subgrouping within Central Malayo-Polynesian inside Malayo-Polynesian. The island of Sumba, located in Eastern Indonesia, has an area of 11,005.62 km2. The name Kambera comes from a traditional region which is close to a town in Waingapu. Because of export trades which concentrated in Waingapu in the 19th century, the language of the Kambera region has become the bridging language in eastern Sumba.

Wappo is an extinct language that was spoken by the Wappo tribe, Native Americans who lived in what is now known as the Alexander Valley north of San Francisco. The last fluent speaker, Laura Fish Somersal, died in 1990. The loss of this language is attributed to the general use of English in schools and workplaces.

In linguistic typology, object–subject–verb (OSV) or object–agent–verb (OAV) is a classification of languages, based on whether the structure predominates in pragmatically neutral expressions. An example of this would be "Oranges Sam ate".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wagiman language</span> Indigenous Australian language

Wagiman, also spelt Wageman, Wakiman, Wogeman, and other variants, is a near-extinct Aboriginal Australian language spoken by a small number of Wagiman people in and around Pine Creek, in the Katherine Region of the Northern Territory.

In linguistics, quirky subjects are a phenomenon where certain verbs specify that their subjects are to be in a case other than the nominative. These non-nominative subjects are determiner phrases that pass subjecthood tests such as subject-oriented anaphora binding, PRO control, reduced relative clause, conjunction reduction, subject-to-subject raising, and subject-to-object raising.

Scrambling is a syntactic phenomenon wherein sentences can be formulated using a variety of different word orders without any change in meaning. Scrambling often results in a discontinuity since the scrambled expression can end up at a distance from its head. Scrambling does not occur in English, but it is frequent in languages with freer word order, such as German, Russian, Persian and Turkic languages. The term was coined by Haj Ross in his 1967 dissertation and is widely used in present work, particularly with the generative tradition.

Biak, also known as Biak-Numfor, Noefoor, Mafoor, Mefoor, Nufoor, Mafoorsch, Myfoorsch and Noefoorsch, is an Austronesian language of the South Halmahera-West New Guinea subgroup of the Eastern Malayo-Polynesian languages.

Uyghur is a Turkic language spoken mostly in the west of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iatmul language</span> Ndu language spoken in Papua New Guinea

Iatmul is the language of the Iatmul people, spoken around the Sepik River in the East Sepik Province, northern Papua New Guinea. The Iatmul, however, do not refer to their language by the term Iatmul, but call it gepmakudi.

Jingulu, also spelt Djingili, is an Australian language spoken by the Jingili people in the Northern Territory of Australia, historically around the township of Elliot. The language is an isolate branch of the Mirndi languages.

The Ngarnji (Ngarndji) or Ngarnka language was traditionally spoken by the Ngarnka people of the Barkly Tablelands in the Northern Territory of Australia. The last fluent speaker of the language died between 1997 and 1998. Ngarnka belongs to the Mirndi language family, in the Ngurlun branch. It is closely related to its eastern neighbours Binbinka, Gudanji and Wambaya. It is more distantly related to its western neighbour Jingulu, and three languages of the Victoria River District, Jaminjung, Ngaliwurru and Nungali. There is very little documentation and description of Ngarnka, however there have been several graduate and undergraduate dissertations written on various aspects of Ngarnka morphology, and a sketch grammar and lexicon of Ngarnka is currently in preparation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Toʼabaita language</span> Malaita language of the Solomon Islands

Toʼabaita, also known as Toqabaqita, Toʼambaita, Malu and Maluʼu, is a language spoken by the people living at the north-western tip of Malaita Island, of South Eastern Solomon Islands. Toʼabaita is an Austronesian language.

Lengo or informally known as doku is a Southeast Solomonic language of Guadalcanal and is closely related to Gela language.

Longgu (Logu) is a Southeast Solomonic language of Guadalcanal, but originally from Malaita.

References

  1. Haider, Hubert (2010). The Syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.