Google matrix

Last updated December 29, 2023

A Google matrix is a particular stochastic matrix that is used by Google's PageRank algorithm. The matrix represents a graph with edges representing links between pages. The PageRank of each page can then be generated iteratively from the Google matrix using the power method. However, in order for the power method to converge, the matrix must be stochastic, irreducible and aperiodic.

Adjacency matrix A and Markov matrix S

In order to generate the Google matrix G, we must first generate an adjacency matrix A which represents the relations between pages or nodes.

Assuming there are N pages, we can fill out A by doing the following:

A matrix element $A_{i,j}$ is filled with 1 if node $j$ has a link to node $i$ , and 0 otherwise; this is the adjacency matrix of links.
A related matrix S corresponding to the transitions in a Markov chain of given network is constructed from A by dividing the elements of column "j" by a number of $k_{j}=\Sigma _{i=1}^{N}A_{i,j}$ where $k_{j}$ is the total number of outgoing links from node j to all other nodes. The columns having zero matrix elements, corresponding to dangling nodes, are replaced by a constant value 1/N. Such a procedure adds a link from every sink, dangling state $a$ to every other node.
Now by the construction the sum of all elements in any column of matrix S is equal to unity. In this way the matrix S is mathematically well defined and it belongs to the class of Markov chains and the class of Perron-Frobenius operators. That makes S suitable for the PageRank algorithm.

Construction of Google matrix G

Fig.2. Google matrix of Cambridge University network (2006), coarse-grained matrix elements are written in the bases of PageRank index, total size N=212710 is shown (from ) Googlematrixcambridge2006.jpg — Fig.2. Google matrix of Cambridge University network (2006), coarse-grained matrix elements are written in the bases of PageRank index, total size N=212710 is shown (from )

Then the final Google matrix G can be expressed via S as:

G_{ij}=\alpha S_{ij}+(1-\alpha ){\frac {1}{N}}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(1)

By the construction the sum of all non-negative elements inside each matrix column is equal to unity. The numerical coefficient $\alpha$ is known as a damping factor.

Usually S is a sparse matrix and for modern directed networks it has only about ten nonzero elements in a line or column, thus only about 10N multiplications are needed to multiply a vector by matrix G.^[2]^[3]

Examples of Google matrix

An example of the matrix $S$ construction via Eq.(1) within a simple network is given in the article CheiRank.

For the actual matrix, Google uses a damping factor $\alpha$ around 0.85.^[2]^[3]^[4] The term $(1-\alpha )$ gives a surfer probability to jump randomly on any page. The matrix $G$ belongs to the class of Perron-Frobenius operators of Markov chains.^[2] The examples of Google matrix structure are shown in Fig.1 for Wikipedia articles hyperlink network in 2009 at small scale and in Fig.2 for University of Cambridge network in 2006 at large scale.

Spectrum and eigenstates of G matrix

Fig3. The spectrum of eigenvalues of the Google matrix of University of Cambridge from Fig.2 at
a
=
1
{\displaystyle \alpha =1}
, blue points show eigenvalues of isolated subspaces, red points show eigenvalues of core component (from ) Googlematrixcambridge2006spectrum.gif — Fig3. The spectrum of eigenvalues of the Google matrix of University of Cambridge from Fig.2 at $\alpha =1$ , blue points show eigenvalues of isolated subspaces, red points show eigenvalues of core component (from )

For $0<\alpha <1$ there is only one maximal eigenvalue $\lambda =1$ with the corresponding right eigenvector which has non-negative elements $P_{i}$ which can be viewed as stationary probability distribution.^[2] These probabilities ordered by their decreasing values give the PageRank vector $P_{i}$ with the PageRank $K_{i}$ used by Google search to rank webpages. Usually one has for the World Wide Web that $P\propto 1/K^{\beta }$ with $\beta \approx 0.9$ . The number of nodes with a given PageRank value scales as $N_{P}\propto 1/P^{\nu }$ with the exponent $\nu =1+1/\beta \approx 2.1$ .^[6]^[7] The left eigenvector at $\lambda =1$ has constant matrix elements. With $0<\alpha$ all eigenvalues move as $\lambda _{i}\rightarrow \alpha \lambda _{i}$ except the maximal eigenvalue $\lambda =1$ , which remains unchanged.^[2] The PageRank vector varies with $\alpha$ but other eigenvectors with $\lambda _{i}<1$ remain unchanged due to their orthogonality to the constant left vector at $\lambda =1$ . The gap between $\lambda =1$ and other eigenvalue being $1-\alpha \approx 0.15$ gives a rapid convergence of a random initial vector to the PageRank approximately after 50 multiplications on $G$ matrix.

Fig4. Distribution of eigenvalues
l
i
{\displaystyle \lambda _{i}}
of Google matrices in the complex plane at
a
=
1
{\displaystyle \alpha =1}
for dictionary networks: Roget (A, N=1022), ODLIS (B, N=2909) and FOLDOC (C, N=13356); UK university WWW networks: University of Wales (Cardiff) (D, N=2778), Birmingham City University (E, N=10631), Keele University (Staffordshire) (F, N=11437), Nottingham Trent University (G, N=12660), Liverpool John Moores University (H, N=13578)(data for universities are for 2002) (from ) Googlematrix1.jpg — Fig4. Distribution of eigenvalues $\lambda _{i}$ of Google matrices in the complex plane at $\alpha =1$ for dictionary networks: Roget (A, N=1022), ODLIS (B, N=2909) and FOLDOC (C, N=13356); UK university WWW networks: University of Wales (Cardiff) (D, N=2778), Birmingham City University (E, N=10631), Keele University (Staffordshire) (F, N=11437), Nottingham Trent University (G, N=12660), Liverpool John Moores University (H, N=13578)(data for universities are for 2002) (from )

At $\alpha =1$ the matrix $G$ has generally many degenerate eigenvalues $\lambda =1$ (see e.g. [6]^[8]). Examples of the eigenvalue spectrum of the Google matrix of various directed networks is shown in Fig.3 from ^[5] and Fig.4 from.^[8]

The Google matrix can be also constructed for the Ulam networks generated by the Ulam method [8] for dynamical maps. The spectral properties of such matrices are discussed in [9,10,11,12,13,15].^[5]^[9] In a number of cases the spectrum is described by the fractal Weyl law [10,12].

Fig5. Distribution of eigenvalues
l
{\displaystyle \lambda }
in the complex plane for the Google matrix
G
{\displaystyle G}
of the Linux Kernel version 2.6.32 with matrix size
N
=
285509
{\displaystyle N=285509}
at
a
=
0.85
{\displaystyle \alpha =0.85}
, unit circle is shown by solid curve (from ) Googlematrix2.jpg — Fig5. Distribution of eigenvalues $\lambda$ in the complex plane for the Google matrix $G$ of the Linux Kernel version 2.6.32 with matrix size $N=285509$ at $\alpha =0.85$ , unit circle is shown by solid curve (from )

Fig.6 Coarse-grained probability distribution for the eigenstates of the Google matrix for Linux Kernel version 2.6.32. The horizontal lines show the first 64 eigenvectors ordered vertically by
|
l
i
|
{\displaystyle |\lambda _{i}|}
(from ) Googlematrix3.gif — Fig.6 Coarse-grained probability distribution for the eigenstates of the Google matrix for Linux Kernel version 2.6.32. The horizontal lines show the first 64 eigenvectors ordered vertically by $|\lambda _{i}|$ (from )

The Google matrix can be constructed also for other directed networks, e.g. for the procedure call network of the Linux Kernel software introduced in [15]. In this case the spectrum of $\lambda$ is described by the fractal Weyl law with the fractal dimension $d\approx 1.3$ (see Fig.5 from ^[9]). Numerical analysis shows that the eigenstates of matrix $G$ are localized (see Fig.6 from ^[9]). Arnoldi iteration method allows to compute many eigenvalues and eigenvectors for matrices of rather large size [13].^[5]^[9]

Other examples of $G$ matrix include the Google matrix of brain [17] and business process management [18], see also.^[1] Applications of Google matrix analysis to DNA sequences is described in [20]. Such a Google matrix approach allows also to analyze entanglement of cultures via ranking of multilingual Wikipedia articles abouts persons [21]

Historical notes

The Google matrix with damping factor was described by Sergey Brin and Larry Page in 1998 [22], see also articles on PageRank history [23],[24].

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lyapunov exponent</span> The rate of separation of infinitesimally close trajectories

In mathematics, the Lyapunov exponent or Lyapunov characteristic exponent of a dynamical system is a quantity that characterizes the rate of separation of infinitesimally close trajectories. Quantitatively, two trajectories in phase space with initial separation vector $diverge at a rate given by$

The Morse potential, named after physicist Philip M. Morse, is a convenient interatomic interaction model for the potential energy of a diatomic molecule. It is a better approximation for the vibrational structure of the molecule than the quantum harmonic oscillator because it explicitly includes the effects of bond breaking, such as the existence of unbound states. It also accounts for the anharmonicity of real bonds and the non-zero transition probability for overtone and combination bands. The Morse potential can also be used to model other interactions such as the interaction between an atom and a surface. Due to its simplicity, it is not used in modern spectroscopy. However, its mathematical form inspired the MLR (Morse/Long-range) potential, which is the most popular potential energy function used for fitting spectroscopic data.

In graph theory and network analysis, indicators of centrality assign numbers or rankings to nodes within a graph corresponding to their network position. Applications include identifying the most influential person(s) in a social network, key infrastructure nodes in the Internet or urban networks, super-spreaders of disease, and brain networks. Centrality concepts were first developed in social network analysis, and many of the terms used to measure centrality reflect their sociological origin.

In probability theory and mathematical physics, a random matrix is a matrix-valued random variable—that is, a matrix in which some or all elements are random variables. Many important properties of physical systems can be represented mathematically as matrix problems. For example, the thermal conductivity of a lattice can be computed from the dynamical matrix of the particle-particle interactions within the lattice.

In theoretical physics, massive gravity is a theory of gravity that modifies general relativity by endowing the graviton with a nonzero mass. In the classical theory, this means that gravitational waves obey a massive wave equation and hence travel at speeds below the speed of light.

In graph theory, eigenvector centrality is a measure of the influence of a node in a network. Relative scores are assigned to all nodes in the network based on the concept that connections to high-scoring nodes contribute more to the score of the node in question than equal connections to low-scoring nodes. A high eigenvector score means that a node is connected to many nodes who themselves have high scores.

In the mathematical field of linear algebra and convex analysis, the numerical range or field of values of a complex $matrix A is the set$

In the mathematical field of linear algebra, an arrowhead matrix is a square matrix containing zeros in all entries except for the first row, first column, and main diagonal, these entries can be any number. In other words, the matrix has the form

In chemical graph theory, the Estrada index is a topological index of protein folding. The index was first defined by Ernesto Estrada as a measure of the degree of folding of a protein, which is represented as a path-graph weighted by the dihedral or torsional angles of the protein backbone. This index of degree of folding has found multiple applications in the study of protein functions and protein-ligand interactions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CheiRank</span>

The CheiRank is an eigenvector with a maximal real eigenvalue of the Google matrix $constructed for a directed network with the inverted directions of links. It is similar to the PageRank vector, which ranks the network nodes in average proportionally to a number of incoming links being the maximal eigenvector of the Google matrix with a given initial direction of links. Due to inversion of link directions the CheiRank ranks the network nodes in average proportionally to a number of outgoing links. Since each node belongs both to CheiRank and PageRank vectors the ranking of information flow on a directed network becomes two-dimensional.$

In physics, Liouville field theory is a two-dimensional conformal field theory whose classical equation of motion is a generalization of Liouville's equation.

Bimetric gravity or bigravity refers to two different classes of theories. The first class of theories relies on modified mathematical theories of gravity in which two metric tensors are used instead of one. The second metric may be introduced at high energies, with the implication that the speed of light could be energy-dependent, enabling models with a variable speed of light.

In network theory, multidimensional networks, a special type of multilayer network, are networks with multiple kinds of relations. Increasingly sophisticated attempts to model real-world systems as multidimensional networks have yielded valuable insight in the fields of social network analysis, economics, urban and international transport, ecology, psychology, medicine, biology, commerce, climatology, physics, computational neuroscience, operations management, and finance.

Infinite derivative gravity is a theory of gravity which attempts to remove cosmological and black hole singularities by adding extra terms to the Einstein–Hilbert action, which weaken gravity at short distances.

In theoretical physics, the dual graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle that is a dual of the graviton under electric-magnetic duality, as an S-duality, predicted by some formulations of supergravity in eleven dimensions.

In theoretical physics, the dual photon is a hypothetical elementary particle that is a dual of the photon under electric–magnetic duality which is predicted by some theoretical models, including M-theory.

The quantum Fisher information is a central quantity in quantum metrology and is the quantum analogue of the classical Fisher information. The quantum Fisher information $of a state with respect to the observable is defined as$

A set of networks that satisfies given structural characteristics can be treated as a network ensemble. Brought up by Ginestra Bianconi in 2007, the entropy of a network ensemble measures the level of the order or uncertainty of a network ensemble.

In mathematics, the graph Fourier transform is a mathematical transform which eigendecomposes the Laplacian matrix of a graph into eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Analogously to the classical Fourier transform, the eigenvalues represent frequencies and eigenvectors form what is known as a graph Fourier basis.

Hamiltonian truncation is a numerical method used to study quantum field theories (QFTs) in $spacetime dimensions. Hamiltonian truncation is an adaptation of the Rayleigh-Ritz method from quantum mechanics. It is closely related to the exact diagonalization method used to treat spin systems in condensed matter physics. The method is typically used to study QFTs on spacetimes of the form, specifically to compute the spectrum of the Hamiltonian along . A key feature of Hamiltonian truncation is that an explicit ultraviolet cutoff is introduced, akin to the lattice spacing a in lattice Monte Carlo methods. Since Hamiltonian truncation is a nonperturbative method, it can be used to study strong-coupling phenomena like spontaneous symmetry breaking.$

References

1 2 3 Ermann, L.; Chepelianskii, A. D.; Shepelyansky, D. L. (2011). "Towards two-dimensional search engines". Journal of Physics A. 45 (27): 275101. arXiv: 1106.6215 . Bibcode:2012JPhA...45A5101E. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/27/275101. S2CID 14827486.
1 2 3 4 5 Langville, Amy N.; Meyer, Carl (2006). Google's PageRank and Beyond. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-12202-1.
1 2 Austin, David (2008). "How Google Finds Your Needle in the Web's Haystack". AMS Feature Columns.
↑ Law, Edith (2008-10-09). "PageRank Lecture 12" (PDF).
1 2 3 4 Frahm, K. M.; Georgeot, B.; Shepelyansky, D. L. (2011-11-01). "Universal emergence of PageRank". Journal of Physics A. 44 (46): 465101. arXiv: 1105.1062 . Bibcode:2011JPhA...44T5101F. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/46/465101. S2CID 16292743.
↑ Donato, Debora; Laura, Luigi; Leonardi, Stefano; Millozzi, Stefano (2004-03-30). "Large scale properties of the Webgraph" (PDF). European Physical Journal B. 38 (2): 239–243. Bibcode:2004EPJB...38..239D. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.104.2136 . doi:10.1140/epjb/e2004-00056-6. S2CID 10640375.
↑ Pandurangan, Gopal; Ranghavan, Prabhakar; Upfal, Eli (2005). "Using PageRank to Characterize Web Structure" (PDF). Internet Mathematics. 3 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/15427951.2006.10129114 . S2CID 101281.
1 2 3 Georgeot, Bertrand; Giraud, Olivier; Shepelyansky, Dima L. (2010-05-25). "Spectral properties of the Google matrix of the World Wide Web and other directed networks". Physical Review E. 81 (5): 056109. arXiv: 1002.3342 . Bibcode:2010PhRvE..81e6109G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.81.056109. PMID 20866299. S2CID 14490804.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Ermann, L.; Chepelianskii, A. D.; Shepelyansky, D. L. (2011). "Fractal Weyl law for Linux Kernel Architecture". European Physical Journal B. 79 (1): 115–120. arXiv: 1005.1395 . Bibcode:2011EPJB...79..115E. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2010-10774-7. S2CID 445348.

Serra-Capizzano, Stefano (2005). "Jordan Canonical Form of the Google Matrix: a Potential Contribution to the PageRank Computation". SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 27 (2): 305. doi:10.1137/s0895479804441407. hdl: 11383/1494937 .
Ulam, Stanislaw (1960). A Collection of Mathematical Problems. Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics. New York: Interscience. p. 73.
Froyland G.; Padberg K. (2009). "Almost-invariant sets and invariant manifolds—Connecting probabilistic and geometric descriptions of coherent structures in flows". Physica D. 238 (16): 1507. Bibcode:2009PhyD..238.1507F. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2009.03.002.
Shepelyansky D.L.; Zhirov O.V. (2010). "Google matrix, dynamical attractors and Ulam networks". Phys. Rev. E. 81 (3): 036213. arXiv: 0905.4162 . Bibcode:2010PhRvE..81c6213S. doi:10.1103/physreve.81.036213. PMID 20365838. S2CID 15874766.
Ermann L.; Shepelyansky D.L. (2010). "Google matrix and Ulam networks of intermittency maps". Phys. Rev. E. 81 (3): 036221. arXiv: 0911.3823 . Bibcode:2010PhRvE..81c6221E. doi:10.1103/physreve.81.036221. PMID 20365846. S2CID 388806.
Ermann L.; Shepelyansky D.L. (2010). "Ulam method and fractal Weyl law for Perron-Frobenius operators". Eur. Phys. J. B. 75 (3): 299–304. arXiv: 0912.5083 . Bibcode:2010EPJB...75..299E. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2010-00144-0. S2CID 54899977.
Frahm K.M.; Shepelyansky D.L. (2010). "Ulam method for the Chirikov standard map". Eur. Phys. J. B. 76 (1): 57–68. arXiv: 1004.1349 . Bibcode:2010EPJB...76...57F. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2010-00190-6. S2CID 55539783.
Chepelianskii, Alexei D. (2010). "Towards physical laws for software architecture". arXiv: 1003.5455 [cs.SE].
Shepelyansky D.L.; Zhirov O.V. (2010). "Towards Google matrix of brain". Phys. Lett. A. 374 (31–32): 3206. arXiv: 1002.4583 . Bibcode:2010PhLA..374.3206S. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2010.06.007.
Abel M.; Shepelyansky D.L. (2011). "Google matrix of business process management". Eur. Phys. J. B. 84 (4): 493. arXiv: 1009.2631 . Bibcode:2011EPJB...84..493A. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2010-10710-y. S2CID 15510734.
Kandiah, Vivek; Shepelyansky, Dima L. (2013). "Google Matrix Analysis of DNA Sequences". PLOS ONE. 8 (5): e61519. arXiv: 1301.1626 . Bibcode:2013PLoSO...861519K. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061519 . PMC 3650020 . PMID 23671568.
Eom, Young-Ho; Shepelyansky, Dima L. (2013). "Highlighting Entanglement of Cultures via Ranking of Multilingual Wikipedia Articles". PLOS ONE. 8 (10): e74554. arXiv: 1306.6259 . Bibcode:2013PLoSO...874554E. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074554 . PMC 3789750 . PMID 24098338.
Brin S.; Page L. (1998). "The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine". Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. 30 (1–7): 107. doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x. S2CID 7587743.
Massimo, Franceschet (2010). "PageRank: Standing on the shoulders of giants". arXiv: 1002.2858 [cs.IR].
Vigna, Sebastiano (2010). "Spectral Ranking" (PDF).

External links

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[Ermann2011-1] 1 2 3 Ermann, L.; Chepelianskii, A. D.; Shepelyansky, D. L. (2011). "Towards two-dimensional search engines". Journal of Physics A. 45 (27): 275101. arXiv: 1106.6215 . Bibcode:2012JPhA...45A5101E. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/27/275101. S2CID 14827486.

[Langville2006-2] 1 2 3 4 5 Langville, Amy N.; Meyer, Carl (2006). Google's PageRank and Beyond. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-12202-1.

[Austin2008-3] 1 2 Austin, David (2008). "How Google Finds Your Needle in the Web's Haystack". AMS Feature Columns.

[4] Law, Edith (2008-10-09). "PageRank Lecture 12" (PDF).

[Frahm2011-5] 1 2 3 4 Frahm, K. M.; Georgeot, B.; Shepelyansky, D. L. (2011-11-01). "Universal emergence of PageRank". Journal of Physics A. 44 (46): 465101. arXiv: 1105.1062 . Bibcode:2011JPhA...44T5101F. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/46/465101. S2CID 16292743.

[6] Donato, Debora; Laura, Luigi; Leonardi, Stefano; Millozzi, Stefano (2004-03-30). "Large scale properties of the Webgraph" (PDF). European Physical Journal B. 38 (2): 239–243. Bibcode:2004EPJB...38..239D. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.104.2136 . doi:10.1140/epjb/e2004-00056-6. S2CID 10640375.

[7] Pandurangan, Gopal; Ranghavan, Prabhakar; Upfal, Eli (2005). "Using PageRank to Characterize Web Structure" (PDF). Internet Mathematics. 3 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/15427951.2006.10129114 . S2CID 101281.

[Georgeot2010-8] 1 2 3 Georgeot, Bertrand; Giraud, Olivier; Shepelyansky, Dima L. (2010-05-25). "Spectral properties of the Google matrix of the World Wide Web and other directed networks". Physical Review E. 81 (5): 056109. arXiv: 1002.3342 . Bibcode:2010PhRvE..81e6109G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.81.056109. PMID 20866299. S2CID 14490804.

[Ermann2011-2-9] 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ermann, L.; Chepelianskii, A. D.; Shepelyansky, D. L. (2011). "Fractal Weyl law for Linux Kernel Architecture". European Physical Journal B. 79 (1): 115–120. arXiv: 1005.1395 . Bibcode:2011EPJB...79..115E. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2010-10774-7. S2CID 445348.

[2]

[3]

[4]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[5]

[9]

[1]