Graduate Employees' Organization 3550

Last updated
Graduate Employees' Organization 3550
FormationApril 15, 1974
PurposeOur mission is to represent, advocate for, and organize graduate student workers and to build collective power in the pursuit of social & economic justice.
HeadquartersAnn Arbor, MI
Parent organization
 American Federation of Teachers
Website geo3550.org

Graduate Employees' Organization 3550 (GEO 3550) is a labor union representing the over 2,000 Graduate Student Instructors (GSIs) and Graduate Student Staff Assistants (GSSAs) on the three campuses that make up the University of Michigan (U-M).

Contents

Organizing for a graduate student union at U-M began in the 1970s. They were first certified as the official union representing GSIs, GSSAs, and Graduate Student Research Assistants (GSRAs) at U-M on April 15, 1974, and they won their first contract the next year. [1] GEO 3550 is one of the oldest graduate student unions in the United States. GEO 3550 is affiliated with the Michigan and American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and, through AFT, with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO). [2]

GEO 3550's "mission is to represent, advocate for, and organize graduate student workers and to build collective power in the pursuit of social & economic justice." [3] In 2019, the union's Steward's Council adopted the following nine guiding principals: Represent, Advocate For, Organize, Collective Bargaining, Democracy, Social Justice, Solidarity, Community, Education & Research. [3]

GEO 3550 won their first contract in 1975 and won their most recent contract in the spring of 2020. Bargaining for their next contract begins in the fall of 2022, and their current contract expires at the end of the 2022-2023 academic year. [4]

Organization

Union Structure

According to the GEO 3550 constitution, all graduate students at U-M are eligible to become members of the union, and all union decisions besides those enumerated in the constitution are to be made by the membership. Although all graduate students are eligible to become members of the union, the union's bargaining unit is composed of only those graduate students who are actively employed as GSIs or GSSAs.

The union's constitutional officers include a President, a vice-president, a Secretary, and a Treasurer, all of whom are elected every year by a majority vote at a general membership meeting. The union also has a Steward's Council, composed of department-level representatives, which exists "to oversee the implementation of Organizational policy as directed by the membership." [5]

The Steward's Council is also empowered to both create and dissolve standing committees by majority vote. The currently active standing committees are:

Union members also maintain several caucuses that organize around specific issues. Some currently active caucuses include the BIPOC Caucus, the International GSI Caucus, the Feminist Caucus, the Housing Caucus, the Climate Caucus, and the Abolition Caucus.

Contract Cycles

GEO 3550 operates on a three-year contract cycle. The first year after winning a new contract is considered an enforcement year, when the union focuses on enforcing contract wins through grievance procedures and member education. The second year is considered a platform development year, when the union focuses on surveying member needs and priorities, and drafts new contract language to try and incorporate into the next contract. The third year is considered a bargaining year, when the union focuses on bargaining with the university's human resources representatives for a new contract.

History

Early organizing efforts

Graduate students at the University of Michigan first threatened to form a labor union in 1966. At the time, the university employed about 900 "teaching fellows" (now GSIs) who were paid $2,400 per academic year. On April 10, 1966, a group of teaching fellows met with Allan F. Smith, the university's vice president for academic affairs, to demand a $1,200 raise, better communication with university administration, smaller class sizes, tuition relief. If their demands were not met, the teaching fellows threatened to affiliate with the American Federation of Teachers. [6] However, it was not until 1970 that U-M teaching fellows first petitioned the Michigan Employment Relations Commission (MERC) for a union election. [7] [8] This first effort was struck down, however, when MERC issued a decision agreeing with university administrators that, if teaching fellows were to be considered employees, they would have to be part of a unit alongside GSSAs and GSRAs. Rather than taking the decision to court, the teaching fellows decided to stop pursuing their unionization efforts. [1]

Unionization efforts for graduate students at U-M did not pick up again until 1973 in response to several administration decisions including a 24% tuition increase. [1] The tuition hike sparked a period of intense student organizing at the university with at least 3,000 students signing a tuition strike pledge started by the Student Action Committee and supported by the Student Government Council. [9] The response by graduate students was the formation of the Organization of Teaching Fellows (OTF), who casually affiliated themselves with the American Association of University Professors (AAUP). After a pay increase averted a potential strike, teaching fellows continued to organize and joined the university's GSRAs and GSSAs to form GEO and officially request a MERC election for the second time in their history. This time, the university agreed to a union election, and GEO was certified as the university's union for "Graduate Student Assistants" on April 15, 1974, by a vote of 807–424. [1]

Fight for a first contract (1974-6)

Negotiations between GEO and U-M for the union's first contract began in June 1974. An early point of contention in the bargaining process was an 8% raise given to faculty but not teaching fellows despite promises made by the university. After delivering the raise to faculty, the university specified that they would only give the raise to teaching fellows if they dropped all other economic demands. This would have meant abandoning demands for equal pay for GSRAs and GSSAs, tuition waivers, and the standardization of wages across the university. [10] GEO threatened to file an unfair labor charge against the university with MERC, but Vice President for Academic Affairs Allan F. Smith claimed U-M was justified in going back on its promise because the promise had been made before the union was certified. [11] By November, GEO and the university were still far from reaching an agreement. In response to GEO's demand of an immediate 25% raise, the university offered an 8% raise over two years. In response to GEO's demand for tuition waivers for all graduate employees, the university offered to allow those currently paying out-of-state tuition to pay the lower in-state tuition. [12] When the two parties still had not reached an agreement by February 1975, members voted 689–193 to authorize a strike. The strike continued until March 14, with graduate students initially picketing classroom buildings before shifting focus to blocking deliveries at service buildings as the number of students and faculty crossing the picket lines gradually increased as the strike wore on. The agreement, finalized through mediation with the MERC-appointed fact finder Patrick McDonald, included compromises on several GEO demands:

Effects of the 1975 strike reverberated out into the wider Ann Arbor community, even influencing local legislation proposals. In March of that year, the Human Rights Party included the repeal of the law that criminalized disobeying a police officer's orders as part of its broader police reforms after several GEO members were arrested under that charge during the strike. [14]

Just months after the first contract went into effect, GEO members raised alarms about the university's handling of its obligation to implement affirmative action in hiring that would foreshadow the difficult negotiations it would undertake the next year for its second contract. GEO had found that the university was labeling all racial minority and international students as "minorities" in order to inflate the number of minority employees presented by the university. GEO claimed that this violated both the agreement in their contract that required a breakdown of racial demographics into "Black, Asian, Native American, Chicano and other Spanish Surnamed" as well as then-president Robben Wright Fleming's directive in the university's 1973 affirmative action report to the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. GEO also claimed that the university violated the spirit of their agreement by not incorporating recruitment into their affirmative action efforts. [15]

In an effort to give stability to the union, whose members frequently changed as new students enrolled and senior students graduated, 58% of voting GEO members decided on February 19, 1976, to accept the union's executive committee's recommendation to affiliate with the American Federation of Teachers. [16]

The student-employee question (1976-81)

Disagreements over affirmative action and non-discrimination protections plagued the negotiations over GEO's second contract that began in 1976. Although GEO pushed for the university to initiate recruitment efforts of women and minority students to fulfill the commitment to affirmative action made by the university in its first contract with the union, U-M negotiators maintained that they were only bound by federal requirements to collect data. With the second contract, the university also tried to revise the non-discrimination clause it had agreed to by getting rid of the specifically cited protected categories and replacing it with a blanket statement stating that its "departments will not discriminate against employees based on factors not specifically mentioned unless the University decides a certain factor interferes with job performance." [17]

As the union and the university entered a stalemate in their bargaining sessions, GEO was also unable to tip the scales in their favor through a work stoppage like they had in 1975. On October 27, the union initiated a strike vote amongst its membership, but at the same time that membership voted in favor of sending out the strike ballots they also voted in favor of requiring a two-thirds majority as well as a minimum of 660 "yes" votes in order to trigger a strike instead of the constitutionally-required simple majority of those who vote. [18] Ultimately, the strike vote failed and the union returned to the bargaining table.

When the union returned to the bargaining table and attempted to accept the compromise of the university's previous offer, the university refused to sign the agreement until GEO dropped two outstanding grievances. In November, GEO filed an unfair labor practices charge against the university. As the stalemate deepened, GEO made a second unsuccessful effort to launch a strike in March 1977 and also began a campaign to have the university regents make the university's representatives resume negotiations. [19]

Although an August 19 ruling found the university guilty of an unfair labor practice for not signing a contract with GEO, the university decided to appeal the decision with the intent to shift focus onto the question of whether graduate assistants were students or employees. [20] The university had attempted to enter evidence into consideration that graduate assistants were students, not employees, during the original unfair labor practice trial, but the MERC administrative judge handling the case, Shlomo Sperka, would not admit the evidence because of his belief that the student-employee question had been decided by the 1973 Michigan Supreme Court decision that ruled that interns and residents at the U-M hospital were simultaneously both and therefore eligible to organize a labor union. [21] GEO hoped the regents would intervene to prevent an appeal, but on September 16 the regents voted 5–3 to approve the appeal. [22]

In January 1978, MERC stated that it could not consider U-M's appeal of the unfair labor practice decision until evidence was heard regarding the student-employee question and ordered Judge Sperka to begin hearing testimony on the issue. Faced with a decision between challenging the MERC order and taking the issue to the Michigan State Court of Appeals where the applicability of the 1973 intern/resident decision to graduate students would be debated, or arguing the issue directly with the MERC judge, GEO decided go forward with the MERC order. [21] The student-employee question would go on to dominate nearly a half-decade of GEO's history.

During the trial, which began in May 1978 and would not conclude until November 1981, both the union and the university called witnesses and submitted evidence to support their positions with the former arguing that graduate assistants were employees and the latter that they were students. Early in the trial, the Senate Advisory Committee on University Affairs (SACUA), the executive committee of the university's faculty senate, took the side of U-M in arguing that graduate assistants were students, not employees, and attempted to submit a statement to that effect that was rejected by Judge Sperka as irrelevant to the case. The primary reason for the faculty members' position against graduate assistants being employees was that such a decision would imply that professors were supervisors, and the members of SACUA believed the employee-supervisor relationship would damage the traditional student-professor relationship. [23]

Then-president Robben Wright Fleming also testified against GEO during the trial. Fleming's testimony against considering graduate assistants to be employees focused on his claim that he received frequent complaints about the university's decision to rely so heavily on the use of GSIs instead of professors. During his testimony, Fleming said the university's use of GSIs was "the biggest single criticism [he's] heard of the University," but that he defends the decision by saying the teaching experience is part of graduate students' education. [24]

GEO's defense focused on calling graduate assistants as witnesses and highlighting the similarities between the work performed by graduate assistants and that performed by professors. [25]

Throughout the trial, GEO was plagued by high turnover and low membership. On September 5, GEO President Mike Clark resigned from his position, citing overwork as the main reason, and when the union sent ballots out to all GEO members to elect a new president there were only about 150 members on the books. [26] [27]

On July 14, 1980, Judge Sperka ruled that GSIs and GSSAs qualified as employees but that GSRAs did not. This time, both U-M and GEO appealed the decision, with U-M still aiming to disqualify all graduate assistants from employment status and GEO now aiming to restore GSRAs to employee status. [28] [29]

In early November 1981, MERC reaffirmed the earlier decision that GSIs and GSSAs were employees but GSRAs were not, and it also ordered the university to abide by the contract that had been arrived at in 1976 before the legal disputes began. [30] On November 20, then-president Harold Tafler Shapiro announced the university would not appeal the latest MERC decision, and Assistant University Personnel Director John Forsyth signed the old 1976 contract on behalf of the university on November 23, finally giving GEO a second contract after 5 years of operating without one. [31] [32]

Internal divisions and back to the bargaining table (1981-3)

As GEO went back to the bargaining table with the university for the first time following its lengthy legal battle, the union was plagued by low membership and internal divisions that at least partly resulted from the half-decade of operating with no contract for graduate assistants. [33]

By the spring of 1982, GEO had proposed a contract that included, among other items, a nearly $2,000 salary increase, the equalizing of salaries between staff assistants and library assistants, full tuition waivers, in-state tuition for family members of GEO members, the establishment of caps on class sizes, training for GSIs, and the creation of committees involving GEO to ensure the university would meet its affirmative action goals. [34] By July, the bargaining team had reached a tentative agreement with the university on a new contract that included advances on some of the university's priorities, and union officials were optimistic about the membership officially approving the contract. [35] [36] [37]

However, it quickly became clear that union officials' optimism was misplaced. At one meeting in the fall of 1982 GEO members voted against recommending approval of the contract, citing insufficient raises given that wages had not kept up with inflation during the five year legal battle between the university and the union as well as a refusal by the university to move on affirmative action and class size caps. [38] Internal divisions led to a proliferation of op-eds in the student newspaper The Michigan Daily both in favor of and opposed to the new contract proposal. [39] [40] [41] When the October 27th deadline for voting on the new contract came and passed, GEO had not yet received enough votes to finalize the ballots with only about 40% of members having voted instead of the 50% required to call the vote. Given the low turnout, union officials decided to extend the vote through October 30. [42] Ultimately, members voted down the proposal. [43]

GEO members decided to elect a new bargaining committee to replace the one that had produced the rejected contract proposal, and a temporary agreement between the union and the university in the fall of 1982 allowed graduate assistants to receive a raise and increased tuition waiver as contract negotiations continued. [44] [45] It wasn't until the fall of 1983 that the new bargaining team reached an agreement with the university and the membership narrowly voted to approve the one-year contract, which included a 5.1% raise, a tuition reduction of about 7%, and an encouragement but not a requirement for departments to establish class size caps. [46] [47]

Problems in Washington and rebuilding the union (1983-5)

Although the union had settled its new contract, GEO soon ran into new problems when Congress allowed the bill that made tuition waivers tax exempt to expire in December 1983. The union claimed that the resulting increase in graduate assistants tax withholding amounted to between a $75 and $100 per month pay cut. The union attempted to reopen negotiations with the university, claiming that the tax hike effectively violated the raises guaranteed in their new contract, but they met resistance from the university. [48] [49] On March 22, 1984, the union announced that it would file a grievance against the university to have the additional taxes returned to graduate assistants. To counter, the university offered to provide students with emergency $750 loans. [50] In April, GEO publicized an IRS document that they claimed indicated the university was not obligated to implement the tax on tuition waivers, and they also claimed that U-M was the only university to have actually implemented it. [51] [52] The situation was finally resolved after US President Ronald Reagan signed the tax exemption of tuition waivers back into law on October 31. In response, the university announced it would return taxes withheld on tuition waivers to graduate students, but GEO members raised concerns that the bill signed by Reagan was only a temporary fix that left graduate students vulnerable to future loss of tax exempt status. [53]

During the same period, GEO also began to try and enforce the closed shop clause it had won in its first contract back in 1976 for the first time. The lengthy legal battle with the university and a lackluster campaign for a second contract had left GEO with low membership and a depleted budget. In the fall semester of the 1983–1984 school year, only 637 of the 1,700 GSIs and GSSAs at U-M were union members, and less than two-thirds of non-members were paying the agency fees required by the closed shop clause. For the first time in its existence, GEO sent warnings to non-members who had not paid their agency fees in February 1984 that they could face termination proceedings if they did not pay the fees. However, this push to collect delinquent agency fees met resistance from some non-members who attempted to organize a petition to have GEO switch to an open shop contract so they would not be required to pay fees for a union in which they were not members. [54] Petitioners argued that open shop policies were common at many businesses, that there not really any benefits to having a union because it was in the university's interest to offer competitive funding packages to attract students, and even that the MERC decision labelling GSIs and GSSAs "employees" was incorrect because their positions were part of their training and financial aid. [55] GEO disagreed with the argument that graduate students would have the same benefits without their advocacy, arguing that even if the university claimed they were not employees, they treated graduate assistants as employees in trying to extract as much labor as possible for the least amount of money. GEO also emphasized the importance of dues and agency fees in maintaining their affiliation with the Michigan and American Federations of Teachers in order to have access to resources like the lawyer who represented the union during their legal battle with the university. [56]

Ultimately, the petition drive to change the GEO contract to an open shop failed because, while the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) allowed workers to petition to have their union change their contract at any time, as public employees the U-M graduate assistants fell under the jurisdiction of the Michigan Labor Relations Act (MLRA), which only allowed such petitions once the existing contract had expired. [57] However, the union faced further difficulties in collecting their agency fees when the university claimed in April 1984 that the warning letters they sent to delinquent non-members were form letters instead of individual notices. [58]

#StrikeForSafeCampus (2020)

On September 3, 2020, following several months of advocating for a series of demands related to the COVID-19 pandemic and campus police, GEO 3550 issued strike authorization ballot to its members. [59] The ballot was approved by membership, and the work stoppage officially began on September 8. [60]

The strike was the result of disagreements over the University of Michigan's pandemic response measures. GEO 3550 claimed the university's response was insufficient and demanded a series of policies including the right to work remotely, the extension of the graduate student childcare subsidy to unlicensed providers, the maintenance of healthcare coverage for students on leaves of absences at no extra cost, better support for international students at the university's International Center, degree timeline/funding extensions, and a $2,500 unconditional emergency grant. [59] In response, the university insisted that a strike violated the "No Interference" article of GEO 3550's contract as well as Michigan's Public Employment Relations Act of 1947, which prohibits public employees from going on strike. [60]

After GEO 3550 members re-authorized the strike for a second week, U-M President Mark Schlissel announced on September 13 that the university was seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the labor union in the Washtenaw County Circuit Court in an attempt to bring the strike to a halt. [61] [62] GEO 3550 members had rejected the university's first offer in the first week of the strike, but the work stoppage officially ended on September 16 after members voted to accept the university's second offer.

Related Research Articles

The Graduate Student Organizing Committee (GSOC) is a labor union representing graduate teaching and research assistants at New York University (NYU).

The Temple University Graduate Students Association (TUGSA) is a graduate employee union that is located at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Graduate student employee unionization</span> Labor unions representing university-employed students

Graduate student employee unionization, or academic student employee unionization, refers to labor unions that represent students who are employed by their college or university to teach classes, conduct research and perform clerical duties. As of 2014, there were at least 33 US graduate employee unions, 18 unrecognized unions in the United States, and 23 graduate employee unions in Canada. By 2019, it is estimated that there were 83,050 unionized student employees in certified bargaining units in the United States. As of 2023, there were at least 156 US graduate student employee unions and 23 graduate student employee unions in Canada.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 3902 is a Canadian labour union local representing sessional lecturers, postdoctoral researchers and teaching assistants (TAs) at the University of Toronto, Victoria University in the University of Toronto, the University of St. Michael's College and New College in the University of Toronto.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008–2009 York University strike</span>

The 2008–2009 York University strike was a strike by CUPE Local 3903, the union representing contract professors, teaching assistants, and graduate assistants at York University.

The Graduate Employees' Organization at UIUC (GEO) is a labor union created to defend and extend the bargaining and employment rights of Graduate Employees at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC).

Graduate Employees Together – University of Pennsylvania (GET-UP) is a group of graduate students at the University of Pennsylvania that is trying to become recognized as a union. The group, first formed in the spring of 2001, and affiliated with the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). In 2004, according to exit polling by The Daily Pennsylvanian, the limited set of University of Pennsylvania graduate student employees included in the bargaining unit voted for unionization; however, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), before the votes were counted, decided that graduate students in private universities are not employees, while graduate students in public universities may be employees. The group began to re-form in 2016, and re-affiliated with AFT in October 2016. On March 2, 2017 the group once again decided to go public with their unionization campaign. The group has not been recognized by the University as a union for the purposes of collective bargaining.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Schlissel</span> American academic

Mark Steven Schlissel is an American medical scientist who served as the 14th president of the University of Michigan from 2014 to 2022. He was removed from the office by the Board of Regents for being in "an inappropriate relationship with a University employee."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teaching Assistants Association</span> Wisconsin graduate student employee union

The Teaching Assistants Association (TAA) is a graduate student employee union formed at the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1966. It is credited as the first graduate student labor union. Following voluntary recognition by the university as the teaching assistants' bargaining agent in 1969, negotiations resulted in a 1970 strike, which secured "bread-and-butter" gains such as job security alongside grievance procedures. Their major unmet demand from their strike—the inclusion of teaching assistants and students in the course planning process—went unfulfilled. The TAA struck again in 1980 and lost its union recognition until 1986. The union's protest at the Wisconsin State Capitol building began the 2011 Wisconsin protests.

The Graduate Teaching Fellows Federation (GTFF) is a graduate student union at the University of Oregon (UO) established in 1976 to represent graduate student workers, and it is one of the oldest graduate student unions in the United States. Developed out of the earlier Graduate Student Employees Association, the UO administration objected to the establishment of the union, citing that graduate workers were "not public employees", but were rather "primarily students receiving a form of financial aid similar to stipends or scholarships." The Oregon Employment Relations Board (ERB) ruled in favor of the graduate students and supported their right to organize. The GTFF began organizing its first contract in April 1977 with the University of Oregon administration. The negotiations reached an impasse in 1978, and it was not until after two strike votes that an agreement was reached. In 1989, the GTFF secured subsidies for health insurance, which was expanded in 1993 to be fully employer-paid, one of the first such programs offered to graduate teachers in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 York University strike</span> 143-day strike by CUPE Local 3903

The 2018 York University strike was a strike by CUPE Local 3903, the union representing contract professors, teaching assistants, and graduate assistants at York University. At 143 days long it is the longest strike in the post-secondary sector in Canadian history, surpassing the previous record of the 1976 Laval University 108-day strike. It ended on July 25, when the Ontario Legislature passed the Urgent Priorities Act back-to-work legislation.

The Harvard Graduate Students Union (HGSU), officially known as Harvard Graduate Students Union United Auto Workers (HGSU-UAW), is a labor union representing graduate students, teaching assistants, and other student employees at Harvard University. The bargaining unit comprises about 5,000 student employees, including graduate students working as research assistants and teaching fellows as well as several hundred undergraduate students holding teaching positions. Contract negotiations with the university are scheduled to begin in Fall 2018. HGSU is affiliated with the United Auto Workers labor union, whose 400,000 members include 45,000 graduate students and 30,000 academic workers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Santa Cruz graduate students' strike</span> 2020 students strike against the University of California

The 2020 Santa Cruz graduate students' strike was a wildcat strike launched against the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Michigan graduate students' strike</span> 2020 labor strike at the University of Michigan

The 2020 Michigan graduate students' strike was a labor strike launched by the Graduate Employees' Organization 3550, the graduate student employee union that represents approximately 2,100 graduate student instructors at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States. The main cause of the strike was related to graduate students' objection to the university's plans for reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional calls were made by the union for defunding the campus police. The strike started on September 8, 2020, and was scheduled to last for four days, with a subsequent vote extending the strike for another week. Following the start of the strike, resident assistants and student employees for the university's dining services announced they would also strike over similar concerns regarding the university's COVID-19 policies.

The 2021–2022 Columbia University strike was a labor strike involving graduate student workers at Columbia University in New York City. The strike began on March 15, 2021, and ended on May 13, 2021. However, additional strike action commenced on November 3 and lasted until January 7, 2022, when a tentative agreement with the university was reached. The strike was organized by the Graduate Workers of Columbia–United Auto Workers Local 2110 (SWC–UAW), a labor union representing student workers at the university. The goals of the strike were an increase in wages, increased healthcare and childcare coverage, and third-party arbitration in cases of discrimination and sexual harassment.

The 1979 Boston University strike was a labor strike involving employees at Boston University, a private university in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. The strike was participated by faculty members, clerical workers, and librarians, which began on April 5 up to April 23.

Student Researchers United-UAW (SRU-UAW) was a union representing student researchers at the University of California (UC). It was part of the United Auto Workers. The union was composed of more than 17,000 people who work across 10 UC campuses and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. They were the largest 2021 addition to the UAW, accounting for 0.1% of union members in the US, and, according to organizers, were "the largest academic student employee union in US history." The union later joined UAW 2865 and ceased to be an independent entity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 University of California academic workers' strike</span> Strike in California, United States

The 2022 University of California academic workers' strike was a labor strike at all campuses of the University of California (UC) system, including the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. On November 14, some 48,000 academic workers went on strike for better pay and benefits. Led by the United Auto Workers (UAW) labor union, it was the largest strike in the United States in 2022; union organizers describe it as the largest strike in all of U.S. higher education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 Boston University strikes</span> Labor strike in Massachusetts, United States

The 2024 Boston University strikes are labor strikes in Boston, Massachusetts by graduate student and residential life workers at Boston University. The first strike began on March 25, 2024, and was organized by the Boston University Graduate Workers Union (BUGWU) labor union, which is affiliated with the Service Employees International Union Local 509. It is the longest strike the university has experienced since a 1979 strike which lasted two weeks and four days. A concurrent strike by the Boston University Residence Life Union labor union, also affiliated with SEIU 509, ran for four days starting on April 12, 2024. The ResLife Union would begin another strike on August 31, 2024, starting a second concurrent strike with BUGWU, and concluding on September 6. On August 20, 2024, the BUGWU strike would become the longest higher education student worker strike in the past decade, surpassing the previous 147-day record set by University of Michigan graduate students in 2023, and reported by BUGWU to be the longest graduate strike in American history.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "History – Graduate Employees' Organization (GEO)" . Retrieved 2021-12-10.
  2. ↑ "About – Graduate Employees' Organization (GEO)" . Retrieved 2021-12-10.
  3. 1 2 "Mission Statement and Guiding Principles – Graduate Employees' Organization (GEO)" . Retrieved 2021-12-10.
  4. ↑ "University of Michigan reaches agreement with Graduate Employees Organization for three-year contract". mlive. 2020-04-17. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  5. ↑ "Constitution and Bylaws – Graduate Employees' Organization (GEO)" . Retrieved 2021-12-12.
  6. ↑ "900 Ask Raise At U-M". Detroit Free Press . April 11, 1966. Retrieved December 10, 2021.
  7. ↑ Kohn, Howard (September 14, 1970). "U-M Braced for Stormy School Year". Detroit Free Press . p. 12A. Retrieved December 10, 2021.
  8. ↑ "U-M Fights Union OK For Interns". Detroit Free Press . March 25, 1971. p. 14B. Retrieved December 10, 2021.
  9. ↑ ""tuition Hike Has Got To Go" | Ann Arbor District Library". aadl.org. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  10. ↑ "Geo Hits UM Snag | Ann Arbor District Library". aadl.org. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  11. ↑ "GEO Threatens To Sue U | Ann Arbor District Library". aadl.org. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  12. ↑ "Geo Sets Contract Deadline | Ann Arbor District Library". aadl.org. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  13. ↑ "Paper Radio - GEO Strike Ends | Ann Arbor District Library". aadl.org. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  14. ↑ "HRP Aims Proposals At City Police | Ann Arbor District Library". aadl.org. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  15. ↑ "Letters | Ann Arbor District Library". aadl.org. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  16. ↑ Dimick, Jodi (February 20, 1976). "GEO joins teachers federation". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  17. ↑ Ades, Susan (June 18, 1976). "GEO hits 'U' on affirmative action". The Michigan Daily . p. 11. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  18. ↑ Parsigian, Ken (October 27, 1976). "GEO strike vote starts today". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 7. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  19. ↑ Berke, Richard (March 22, 1977). "GEO to decide on strike referendum". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1–2. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  20. ↑ Blanchard, Brian (September 16, 1977). "First Regents meeting hectic". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 5. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  21. 1 2 Warner, Sue (February 10, 1978). "Legalities threaten a union". The Michigan Daily . p. 4. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  22. ↑ Blanchard, Brian; Montemurri, Patty (September 17, 1977). "Medical matters occupy Regents". The Michigan Daily . p. 3. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  23. ↑ O'Connell, Thomas (May 12, 1978). "Crucial GEO hearings continue". The Michigan Daily . p. 3. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  24. ↑ Blanchard, Brian (June 15, 1978). "Fleming: GSA's are students". The Michigan Daily . pp. 3, 11. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  25. ↑ Cantor, Mitch (August 8, 1978). "GEO head testifies for GSAs". The Michigan Daily . pp. 3, 13. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  26. ↑ Cantor, Mitch (September 26, 1978). "GEO president resigns". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  27. ↑ Wolson, Shelley (November 29, 1978). "Bombkyn wins GEO presidency". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  28. ↑ Stuart, Mitch (July 31, 1980). "'U' to appeal ruling on GEO collective bargaining". The Michigan Daily . p. 3. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  29. ↑ Thomson, Charles (September 5, 1980). "'U', GEO appeal; litigation continues". The Michigan Daily . p. 3A. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  30. ↑ Rae, Janet (November 11, 1981). "'U' is undecided on possible appeal". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  31. ↑ Rae, Janet (November 21, 1981). "University won't appeal GEO ruling". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 5. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  32. ↑ Miller, Jennifer (November 24, 1981). "'U' signs first contract with GEO since '75". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 5. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  33. ↑ Rae, Janet (December 2, 1981). "Newly unionized TAs uninformed about GEO". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  34. ↑ Allen, Beth (April 13, 1982). "GEO, 'U' to resume contract negotiations". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 3. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  35. ↑ Thomson, Charles (July 14, 1982). "'U,' GEO reach new agreement". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  36. ↑ "GEO, 'U' agree". The Michigan Daily . July 17, 1982. p. 6. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  37. ↑ Adams, George (September 15, 1982). "TAs to vote on new contract with 'U'". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 3. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  38. ↑ Allen, Beth (October 7, 1982). "TAs grow uneasy over contract vote". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 6. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  39. ↑ Bekken, Jon (October 19, 1982). "For a 'living wage,' a fair contract". The Michigan Daily . p. 4. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  40. ↑ Moyer, Ann; Sullivan, Pat (October 23, 1982). "The new GEO contract: Reasons to vote 'yes'". The Michigan Daily . p. 4. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  41. ↑ Bekken, Jon (October 28, 1982). "GEO contract: Prescription for disaster". The Michigan Daily . p. 4. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  42. ↑ Young, Glen (October 29, 1982). "GEO agrees to extend contract voting deadline". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  43. ↑ Young, Glen (November 5, 1982). "GEO decides to head back to bargaining table with administration". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1–2. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  44. ↑ Young, Glen (November 19, 1982). "TA union elects new bargaining committee members". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 9. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  45. ↑ Witt, Barry (November 30, 1982). "Interim agreement means pay hike for TAs". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  46. ↑ Young, Glen (September 28, 1983). "GEO, University reach accord". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  47. ↑ Rubenstein, Jan (November 18, 1983). "GEO ratifies first pact since '76". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 7. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  48. ↑ Miller, Thomas (February 14, 1984). "GEO waites to see if 'U' will renegotiate contract". The Michigan Daily . p. 3. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  49. ↑ Miller, Thomas (February 16, 1984). "GEO says 'U' won't bargain". The Michigan Daily . p. 2. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  50. ↑ Miller, Thomas (March 24, 1984). "GEO to file grievance with 'U'". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 9. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  51. ↑ Miller, Thomas (April 13, 1984). "No need to tax tuition waiver, GEO says". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1–2. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  52. ↑ Maxwell, Curtis (October 2, 1984). "House votes to return tax-exempt status to TAs". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  53. ↑ Murakami, Kery (November 3, 1984). "TAs to get refund on tuition bill taxes". The Michigan Daily . p. 3. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  54. ↑ Delater, Laurie (March 1, 1984). "Petitioners protest GEO dues". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1, 5. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  55. ↑ Hopp, Wallace (March 10, 1984). "False assumptions concerning GEO". The Michigan Daily . p. 4. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  56. ↑ Goldenfeld, Gene (March 14, 1984). "GEO provides collective benefits". The Michigan Daily . p. 4. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  57. ↑ Miller, Thomas (March 15, 1984). "Legal question stalls petition drive". The Michigan Daily . pp. 1–2. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  58. ↑ Maxwell, Curtis (April 7, 1984). "GEO warning letter has error, says 'U'". The Michigan Daily . p. 1. Retrieved December 11, 2021.
  59. 1 2 Rahal, Sarah. "UM graduate employees issue demands, vote on strike authorization". The Detroit News. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  60. 1 2 Parlette, Cassidy Johncox, Sarah (2020-09-07). "University of Michigan graduate employees to strike, calling for 'safe campus'". WDIV. Retrieved 2021-12-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  61. ↑ Kozlowski, Kim. "UM asks court to halt graduate employees strike". The Detroit News. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  62. ↑ "University of Michigan seeks restraining order to end graduate employee strike". mlive. 2020-09-14. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.