Grounds for divorce (United States)

Last updated

Grounds for divorce are regulations specifying the circumstances under which a person will be granted a divorce. [1] Each state in the United States has its own set of grounds. [2] A person must state the reason they want a divorce at a divorce trial and be able to prove that this reason is well-founded. [3] Several states require that the couple must live apart for several months before being granted a divorce. [4] However, living apart is not accepted as grounds for a divorce in many states. [5]

Contents

In the United States married couples are allowed to end a marriage by filing for a divorce on the grounds of either fault or no fault. [6] In the past, most states only granted divorces on fault grounds, but today all states have adopted the no fault divorce. [7] Fault and no-fault divorces each require that specific grounds be met. [8] A no fault divorce can be granted on grounds such as irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, irreconcilable differences, incompatibility, or after a period of separation, depending on the state. Neither party is held responsible for the failure of the marriage. On the other hand, in fault divorces one party is asking for a divorce because they claim the other party did something wrong that justifies ending the marriage. [7] Several grounds for fault divorce include adultery, cruelty, abandonment, mental illness, and criminal conviction. [7] There are, however, additional grounds that are acceptable in some states such as drug abuse, impotency, and religious reasons. [9]

While there are various grounds for divorce across the United States, there are also defenses that can be raised in response to many divorce claims. [9] These defenses include insufficiency of evidence that the spouse in fact engaged in the conduct cited (or, more strongly, the presence of affirmative evidence to the contrary), acceptance of the alleged conduct at the time when it was engaged in ("condonation"), the complaining party's having engaged in similar conduct of his/her own ("recrimination"), and absence of or insufficiency of evidence proving other conditions invoked as grounds (e.g., insufficient length of separation or presence of a chance of reconciliation). [9]

Car windshield. Oakland, CA. July 2010. Just divorced.jpg
Car windshield. Oakland, CA. July 2010.

History

Divorce laws have changed a great deal over the last few centuries. [10] Many of the grounds for divorce available in the United States today are rooted in the policies instated by early British rule. [11] Following the American Colonies' independence, each settlement generally determined its own acceptable grounds for divorce. [12] During colonial times, grounds for divorce were more limited in scope, both in terms of which grievances could qualify as grounds and in terms of who was able to use them. [13] In the 18th century, such concerns as infidelity, alcohol abuse, mistreatment, abandonment, and impotence were among the few reasons that could qualify as grounds for divorce. [10] For much of America's history, wealthy men were the people most able to seek and to receive a desired split. [13] By the 1960s, however, women and citizens of fewer means found the conditions for seeking divorce more accessible. [13] At this time, the law required that one partner be at-fault in order for the couple to pursue the termination of their marriage. [10] This constraint arose out of the desire to ensure that all of the basis for divorce be adequate. [10] Prior to this, people used such issues as incompatibility or a decline in lucidity as grounds; the court eventually came to see these problems as not severe enough to warrant divorce, however. [10] In the 1970s, no-fault grounds gained favor in many states, [10] and in 2010, New York became one of the last of the fifty states to allow no-fault divorces even in cases where there was no mutual consent to the divorce. The other states still requiring mutual consent for no-fault divorce are Tennessee (except where there are no minor children and the couple have lived apart for two years), Mississippi, [14] and South Dakota. [15]

No-fault divorce

Every state in the United States allows the acquisition of no-fault divorce. [16] When the marriage partners mutually agree that they no longer feel the marriage is worth continuing, a no-fault divorce will allow the couple to obtain a divorce easily. [16] In order to obtain a no-fault divorce in only Tennessee, Mississippi, and South Dakota, the parties must mutually consent to provide information regarding incompatibility or why the marriage partners have changed, grown apart, or have irreconcilable differences. [16] Otherwise, in the rest of the country, only one party has to file for irreconcilable differences, and any excuse will do. If a state requires a separation period, either or both spouses may be required to bring a witness to testify that the parties have been living apart for the required amount of time. [16]

Separation

Marriage partners who are living apart have grounds for no-fault divorce. [4] Like Louisiana, various states have statutes requiring the parties to live apart from one another for a certain predetermined period of time. [4] [17] The reason the time limitation exists is to see if the couple can reconcile. [4] For example, differing from Louisiana, Pennsylvania state law does not permit legal separation. [18] Different states have different time periods of separation as grounds for divorce:

Length of separation as grounds for divorce
StateTime periodRef
California6 months [19]
Texas3 years [20]
New York1 year [21]
Illinois6 months [22]
Georgia30 days [23]
North Carolina1 year [24]
Virginia1 year
(6 months if no children)		 [25]
Maryland1 year [26]
Missouri30 days [27]

Irretrievable breakdown

In the United States, many states allow spouses to divorce if they are no longer willing to live with one another. [7] However, some states use different terminologies for a marriage that breaks down. [7] The cause of the breakdown is legally termed as "irreconcilable differences" or "incompatible of temperament." [7] This breakdown occurs through no fault of the spouses, without blame to one another, and commonly represents grounds for divorce. [7] Regardless of the terminology used, all states allow parties to divorce if the marriage breaks down and the couple agrees that the marriage will not work. [7] In order to attain a divorce on grounds that the marriage is over, the couple is required to prepare an affidavit that the marriage is irreparably broken and sign it under oath. [7] An alternative to a sworn statement is to agree in writing that the marriage is broken beyond repair. [7]

State acceptance

Every state within the United States accepts the no-fault divorce. [8] This option is more common than a fault divorce as it can be more convenient and less expensive. [8] Many believe that a no-fault divorce also causes less strain on a family with children than a fault divorce. [8] By law, one member from the party must acknowledge that the marriage is beyond repair. [8]

Shift of acceptance

When California first enacted divorce laws in 1850, the only grounds for divorce were impotence, extreme cruelty, desertion, neglect, habitual intemperance, fraud, adultery, or conviction of a felony. [28] In 1969-1970, California became the first state to pass a purely no-fault divorce law, i.e., one which did not offer any fault divorce grounds. [29] They chose to terminate all fault grounds for divorce and utilized single no-fault standards making divorce easier and less costly. [29] During the next 15 years no-fault divorce became more common in various states throughout the United States. [29] Some states offer both fault and no-fault options. [29] However, the states that do not carry both options have only the one option of no-fault grounds. [29]

Some marriages do not last very long and early on spouses can begin to assess their marital situation. [30] When a couple decides to critique their marriage, the spouse is determining if it would be reasonable to stay in the union. [30] If one decides to file a divorce, a no-fault divorce should be taken into consideration. [30]

Advantages and disadvantages

Multiple surveys have been given to the American people requesting their opinions regarding no-fault divorce. [31] The surveys revealed that 50% of Americans are disappointed with no-fault divorce and would like alterations to the system to make no-fault divorce more difficult. [31] A no-fault divorce is much easier to obtain than a fault divorce. [32] They save time and money plus neither party has to provide evidence. [32] A no-fault divorce also allows the divorcing parties to have privacy, which can allow them to work with each other during the difficult time. [32]

Even though a fault divorce is more time-consuming, and could even be more likely to violate the parties' privacy, a fault divorce might need to be considered. [32] For example, when the party is going through a fault divorce trial the husband/wife might be convicted of being an unfit parent, which will require evidence so the spouse can be found guilty of abuse. [32]

Fault divorce

A fault divorce is a divorce which is granted after the party asking for the divorce sufficiently proves that the other party did something wrong that justifies ending the marriage. [8] For example, in Texas, grounds for an "at-fault" divorce include cruelty, adultery, a felony conviction, abandonment, living apart, and commitment in a mental institution. [33] The party filing for the divorce must prove that the other party has done something to justify ending the union. [8] Different states have different requirements for obtaining a fault divorce but in each state the spouse filing for the divorce is required to establish a reason for the divorce and provide evidence of the other party’s guilt. [8] The specific grounds for receiving a fault divorce include adultery, impotency, infertility or homosexuality (for heterosexual married couples) of the other party that was not discussed before the union; criminal conviction of a felony or imprisonment of one party for a certain length of time; abandonment or desertion, cruelty, or mental instability of one of the parties. [8]

Divorce courts require proof be given that the grounds actually exist. [8] This can be accomplished by providing testimony from a hired detective with documentation of the spouse's bad behavior or from someone who witnessed or has first-hand knowledge of the spouse's bad behavior. [8] There are defenses a spouse can use to convince the court that he or she is not at fault in order to have the grounds dismissed and possibly prevent a fault divorce. [8] These defenses include collusion, condonation, connivance, and provocation. [8]

Fault divorces are becoming less common today because every state now recognizes no-fault divorces. [8] No-fault divorces are more common since no proof of fault is required. [8] They are not as costly, can be completed faster, and can be less stressful on the family members. [8] However, fault divorces are advantageous if a quick divorce is desirable. [8] This type of divorce is granted quickly without the waiting period of no-fault divorces where parties are ordered to live apart for a specific amount of time before the divorce is finalized. [8] Another benefit of a fault divorce is the monetary gain. [8] Proof of the accused party's wrongdoing may result in the court granting the filing spouse a larger portion of the marital property or increased support and alimony. [8] However, fault divorces are considerably more expensive to obtain than no-fault divorces. [8]

The most common fault grounds include the following:

Adultery

Sexual activities with a person of the opposite sex as well as the same sex involving oral sex and other sexual behavior not necessarily including intercourse constitute adultery. [34] In order to use adultery as grounds for a divorce, the filing party must present sufficient proof that the other party had sexual relations with a third party. [34] Circumstantial as well as documented evidence, including videotapes of the spouse committing the sexual infidelity, can be used as proof of adultery. [34] In addition to this evidence, the accusing partner must prove that the other partner had the opportunity and inclination to commit adultery. [35]

Cruelty

Proof of cruelty or the repeated infliction of serious physical or mental suffering by one marital partner on the other is also grounds for divorce. [34] To obtain a divorce on the grounds of cruelty, the filing spouse must prove that the cruelty has made marriage intolerable for them. [34] The cruelty must have been deliberate and calculated and must not have been provoked by the filing spouse. [34] Acts such as physical attacks, repeated displays of rage involving screaming and violent behavior, as well as continuous false accusations, such as adultery and publicly berating and insulting a spouse or flaunting an affair with another person are some grounds of cruelty. [34] The cruelty must have been recurrent. [34] Single acts of cruelty in a marriage are usually not considered grounds for divorce. [34]

Abandonment or desertion

Leaving the household with the consent of the filing spouse or for reasons consistent with the ongoing existence of a positive relationship, such as completing military service or employment assignments as required by law or to help provide for the family, do not constitute abandonment or desertion. [9] However, refusing to have sexual relations with a spouse can be considered abandonment in some incidences. [9] To obtain a divorce on grounds of abandonment the accused spouse must have voluntarily deserted the marital household with no justification or intention to return. [36] The deserter must have left without the consent of the filing party and remained absent for an uninterrupted period of time. [36] However, a spouse who is unjustly forced from the marital household by the other spouse or leaves to escape domestic violence would not be at fault of abandonment or desertion. [9] In fact, in these cases, the spouse who remains at the home may be charged with "constructive desertion", if their behavior justifies the charge or if that spouse refuses a sincere offer of reconciliation. [9] [37]

Mental illness

Permanent mental illness and incurable insanity is a ground for divorce. [9] To obtain a divorce on grounds of mental illness, the filing spouse must have proof that the other spouse suffers from a permanent psychological disorder that makes marriage impossible. [9] The disorder must be incurable and the spouse must have been diagnosed by doctors competent in psychiatry. [9]

Criminal conviction

The criminal conviction and imprisonment of a spouse is often considered grounds for a divorce. [9] To obtain a divorce on grounds of criminal conviction, the filing spouse must be able to prove that their spouse has been convicted of an illegal offense. [9] In many cases, it is required that the convicted spouse has been sentenced to serve time in prison in order for a divorce to be granted on the grounds of criminal conviction. [9]

Other grounds

Other grounds for divorce may include alcohol or substance abuse and impotency, infertility or homosexuality (for heterosexual married couples) of the other party that was not discussed before the union. Strictly speaking, some jurisdictions may interpret the failure to disclose such conditions in advance as actual or constructive fraud that renders the marriage void, or at least voidable unless and until accepted by the other party once that other party learns of the condition and, thus, serves as grounds for an annulment rather than for dissolution of a theretofore-valid marriage. [9]

Culture, religion, and disease

Several macro-level contexts also serve as reasons behind the decision to seek a divorce. [38] These circumstances represent various aspects of the social life, from technology and social integration, to the economy and military service. [38] Cultural customs or religious establishments can be the foundations for the breakdown of a marriage, as well. [38]

Marrying someone of another religion, ethnicity, or vastly different culture could potentially pave the way for divorce. [38] One partner might find himself unable to handle the societal pressures of the arrangement, or may feel compelled to conform to the spouse's/other culture's ideals (e.g. child rearing, dietary changes, etc.), which could lead to resentment. [39] In New Hampshire, if a spouse's other half joins a religious sect, and that act leads to the destruction of the marriage, then the objecting partner can cite the episode as grounds for divorce; this is one of several grounds categorized unusual. [9]

Divorce is not a possibility for the devotees of certain religious organizations. [40] The Catholic Church, for example, does not permit its adherents to remarry after a divorce unless the marriage has been annulled. They also strongly discourage any legal divorce. [40] Marriage annulments, however, are the current option for the followers of Catholicism to dissolve the official ties to their former significant other. [40] The annulment, which renders a marriage null and void, can be sought on the basis of “adultery, pressure to marry, failure to consummate a marriage through vaginal intercourse, or a refusal to have children,” among other reasons. [40] The Catholic Church considers couples that are divorced but have not been granted an annulment to still have a sacred bond of marriage even if legally divorced.

Substance abuse

Another of the many issues that could lead to a couple's divorce is substance abuse. [9] There is a correlation between domestic violence and abuse of alcohol or narcotics. [41] Since extreme mistreatment of one's spouse is a serious concern, it can be grounds for divorce. The same holds true in cases where a member of the couple feels uncomfortable with the other's overuse of controlled substances. [42]

J.H. van de Laar. The Divorce, 1846. After choosing suitable grounds for divorce, the couple can eventually take its case to court. Dutch Painting in the 19th Century - Van de Laar - The Divorce.png
J.H. van de Laar. The Divorce, 1846. After choosing suitable grounds for divorce, the couple can eventually take its case to court.

Financial backing

A common reason cited as grounds for divorce is one spouse's unwillingness to support the other financially even though he or she has the economic means to do so. [9] Part of the concept of marriage is its role of joining people; when two individuals marry, the sharing of resources is often one of many expected outcomes. [43] If someone in the marriage refuses to uphold this communal monetary expectation, then the other person can file for divorce. [9]

Sexual issues

Sexual incompatibility may be another cause for divorce. [9] Further, in a number of states, impotency can also function as grounds for divorce. [9] If a spouse is unable to have sex with his or her companion, the other member of the couple may file for divorce. [9] To serve as valid grounds, the partner's inability to perform intercourse must have been present at the entire marriage; i.e. if the couple has consummated the relationship, they cannot use impotency as a justification for divorce. [9]

Defenses

The accused was not at fault

In some cases a spouse can prevent a fault divorce by convincing the court that he or she is not at fault. [9] There are four types of defenses that are commonly used to prevent a fault divorce. The first defense, condonation, is used as a defense when the accusing spouse claims that the filing spouse has actually forgiven or accepted the wrongful behavior of their spouse prior to filing the charges and has in fact continued to have relations with them. [44] Likewise, reconciliation, like condonation, is used by the accused spouse to prevent a fault divorce when they can prove that the filing spouse has forgiven them and reconciliation has occurred. [45] Recrimination occurs when the spouse being accused of wrongdoing attempts to stop the divorce process by claiming that the other spouse is guilty of bad behavior themselves. [46] Lastly, provocation is used when the spouse accused of abandoning the marriage defends the suit on the ground that the filing spouse provoked the abandonment. [47]

Possible reconciliation

In a fault divorce, reconciliation and condonation share similarities. [48] If either the husband or wife decides that forgiveness is given, a defense for fault cannot be obtained. [48] As an example, in the case of abandonment, the divorce can't be based on abandonment because one of the spouses forgives on that issue. [48] The couple would have to find another ground for divorce. [48]

Insufficient separation

Under the no-fault grounds of separation for a pre-determined duration, the half of the couple who does not desire a divorce has only one recourse in contesting the break-up. [9] If the span of the spouses’ separation does not last at least as long as was originally decided, then the dissenting person has a suitable defense to challenge the divorce. [9] In the event of a couple's short-lived reunion or further sexual relations, the court can argue that the pair did not adhere to the time requirements of their separation agreement, and the divorce petition can be invalidated. [9]

Related Research Articles

Divorce is the process of terminating a marriage or marital union. Divorce usually entails the canceling or reorganising of the legal duties and responsibilities of marriage, thus dissolving the bonds of matrimony between a married couple under the rule of law of the particular country or state. It can be said to be a legal dissolution of a marriage by a court or other competent body. It is the legal process of ending a marriage.

New York divorce law changed on August 15, 2010, when Governor David Paterson signed no-fault divorce into law in New York state. Until 2010, New York recognized divorces only upon fault-based criteria or upon separation. The State Senate approved the No-Fault Divorce bill on June 30, and the State Assembly passed the bill on July 1.

Legal separation is a legal process by which a married couple may formalize a de facto separation while remaining legally married. A legal separation is granted in the form of a court order. In cases where children are involved, a court order of legal separation often makes child custody arrangements, specifying sole custody or shared parenting, as well as child support. Some couples obtain a legal separation as an alternative to a divorce, based on moral or religious objections to divorce.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Annulment</span> Legal procedure for declaring a marriage null and void

Annulment is a legal procedure within secular and religious legal systems for declaring a marriage null and void. Unlike divorce, it is usually retroactive, meaning that an annulled marriage is considered to be invalid from the beginning almost as if it had never taken place. In legal terminology, an annulment makes a void marriage or a voidable marriage null.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Consummation</span> First sex act as part of a marriage or relationship

In many traditions and statutes of civil or religious law, the consummation of a marriage, often called simply consummation, is the first act of sexual intercourse between two people, following their marriage to each other. The definition of consummation usually refers to penile-vaginal sexual penetration, but some religious doctrines hold that there is an additional requirement that no contraception must be used. In this sense, "a marriage is consummated only if the conjugal act performed deposits semen in the vagina".

No-fault divorce is the dissolution of a marriage that does not require a showing of wrongdoing by either party. Laws providing for no-fault divorce allow a family court to grant a divorce in response to a petition by either party of the marriage without requiring the petitioner to provide evidence that the defendant has committed a breach of the marital contract.

<i>Divorce Act</i> (Canada) Canadian federal law governing divorce

The Divorce Act is the federal Act that governs divorce in Canada. The Constitution of Canada gives the federal Parliament exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the law of marriage and divorce.

Australian family law is principally found in the federal Family Law Act 1975 and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Rules 2021 as well as in other laws and the common law and laws of equity, which affect the family and the relationship between those people, including when those relationships end. Most family law is practised in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia and the Family Court of Western Australia. Australia recognises marriages entered into overseas as well as divorces obtained overseas if they were effected in accordance with the laws of that country. Australian marriage and "matrimonial causes" are recognised by sections 51(xxi) and (xxii) of the Constitution of Australia and internationally by marriage law and conventions, such as the Hague Convention on Marriages (1978).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family Law Act 1975</span>

The Family Law Act 1975(Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia. It has 15 parts and is the primary piece of legislation dealing with divorce, parenting arrangements between separated parents (whether married or not), property separation, and financial maintenance involving children or divorced or separated de facto partners: in Australia. It also covers family violence. It came into effect on 5 January 1976, repealing the Matrimonial Causes Act 1961, which had been largely based on fault. On the first day of its enactment, 200 applications for divorce were filed in the Melbourne registry office of the Family Court of Australia, and 80 were filed in Adelaide, while only 32 were filed in Sydney.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divorce law by country</span> Overview of divorce laws around the world

Divorce law, the legal provisions for the dissolution of marriage, varies widely across the globe, reflecting diverse legal systems and cultural norms. Most nations allow for residents to divorce under some conditions except the Philippines and the Vatican City, an ecclesiastical sovereign city-state, which has no procedure for divorce. In these two countries, laws only allow annulment of marriages.

Divorce in the United States is a legal process in which a judge or other authority dissolves the marriage existing between two persons. Divorce restores the persons to the status of being single and permits them to marry other individuals. In the United States, marriage and divorce fall under the jurisdiction of state governments, not the federal government.

Christian views on divorce find their basis both in biblical sources and in texts authored by the Church Fathers of the early Christian Church, who were unanimous in the teaching regarding the issue.

The Family law of Singapore deals with several family legal issues in Singapore. It deals with adoptions, divorce, children's issues, division of matrimonial property, personal protection orders, probate and maintenance. The family court in Singapore oversees these legal issues. Singapore has two separate and different sets of family law: one for Muslims and the other for everyone else. Family law for Muslims is codified in the Administration of Muslim Law Act (AMLA). Family law for non-Muslims is codified in the Women's Charter. The Family Justice Courts of Singapore (FJC) handles all family cases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divorce law in Sweden</span>

Divorce law in Sweden concerns the dissolution of marriage, child support, alimony, custody and the division of property. Divorce restores the status of married people to individuals, leaving them free to remarry. The divorce laws in Sweden are known to be considerably liberal compared to other jurisdictions.

Grounds for divorce are regulations specifying the circumstances under which a person will be granted a divorce. Adultery is the most common grounds for divorce. However, there are countries that view male adultery differently than female adultery as grounds for divorce.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matrimonial Causes Act 1973</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 is an act of the United Kingdom governing divorce law and marriage in England and Wales.

Divorcein South African law refers to the termination of a marital union, the canceling of the legal duties and responsibilities of marriage and the dissolving of the bonds of matrimony between a married couple. Divorce is unlike annulment, which declares the marriage null and void. Divorce requires the sanction of a court in a legal process. The legal process of divorce may also involve issues of alimony, child custody, child support, distribution of property and division of debt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divorce in England and Wales</span>

In England and Wales, divorce is allowed under the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 on the ground that the marriage has irretrievably broken down without having to prove fault or separation.

Actions for divorce in Scotland may be brought in either the Sheriff Court or the Court of Session. In practice, it is only actions in which unusually large sums of money are in dispute, or with an international element, that are raised in the Court of Session. If, as is usual, there are no contentious issues, it is not necessary to employ a lawyer.

The Family Proceedings Act 1980 is the Act that governs divorce in New Zealand. The New Zealand Parliament has exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the law of marriage and divorce.

References

  1. ↑ "Grounds for Divorce Law &Legal Definition". USLegal. Retrieved November 12, 2011.
  2. ↑ The World Book Encyclopedia (2002 ed.). Chicago: World Book. 1988. p. 253. ISBN   0-7166-0102-8.
  3. ↑ Gross, James J.; Callahan, Michael F. (2006). File for divorce in Maryland, Virginia or the District of Columbia (2nd ed.). Naperville, Ill.: Sphinx Pub. p. 51. ISBN   1-57248-536-1.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Statsky, William P. (2004). Family law : the essentials (2nd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomas/Delmar Learning. p. 89. ISBN   1-4018-4827-3.
  5. ↑ Statsky, William P. (2004). Family law: the essentials (2nd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomas/Delmar Learning. p. 89. ISBN   1-4018-4827-3.
  6. ↑ Loveless, Scott (2007). The family in the new millennium (1. publ. ed.). Westport, Conn. [u.a.]: Praeger. p. 187. ISBN   978-0-275-99240-8.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Choudhri, Nikara K. (2004). The complete guide to divorce law. New York: Citadel Press. p. 7. ISBN   0-8065-2528-2.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Ventura, John; Reed, Mary (2009). Divorce for dummies (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Pub. p. 16. ISBN   978-0-470-41151-3.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Choudrhi, Nihara K. (2004). The Complete Guide to Divorce Law (1st ed.). New York, NY: Kensington Publishing Corp. p. 10. ISBN   0-8065-2528-2.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "History of Divorce in America" . Retrieved November 20, 2011.
  11. ↑ Kitchin, Shepherd (1912). A History of Divorce. Chapman & Hall. pp.  211. ISBN   1-4374-8505-7.
  12. ↑ Kitchin, Shepherd (1912). A History of Divorce. Chapman & Hall. pp.  213. ISBN   1-4374-8505-7.
  13. 1 2 3 "A Brief History of Divorce". The Guardian. September 18, 2009. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
  14. ↑ Confessore, Nicholas (June 15, 2010). "N.Y. Moves Closer to No-Fault Divorce". The New York Times. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
  15. ↑ "SD House Votes Down Unilateral No-Fault Divorce Proposal | KDLT.com South Dakota News - News, Sports, and Weather Sioux Falls South Dakota". Archived from the original on February 27, 2015. Retrieved April 12, 2015.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Haman, Edward A. (2001). How to file your own divorce : with forms (4th ed.). Naperville, IL: Sphinx Pub. p. 31. ISBN   1-57248-132-3.
  17. ↑ Glenda Riley (January 1, 1997). Divorce: An American Tradition. U of Nebraska Press. pp. 242–. ISBN   978-0-8032-8969-7 . Retrieved November 15, 2011.
  18. ↑ Janice Green (April 6, 2010). Divorce After 50: Your Guide to the Unique Legal & Financial Challenges. Nolo. pp. 75–. ISBN   978-1-4133-1081-8 . Retrieved November 15, 2011.
  19. ↑ "Understanding The Six Month Waiting Period For Divorce In California". apeopleschoice.com. April 4, 2021. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
  20. ↑ "Divorce in Texas: Texas Divorce Law FAQs | Texas Divorce Questions". Cordell & Cordell. August 19, 2022. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
  21. ↑ "Understanding legal separation". LawHelpNY. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
  22. ↑ "Divorce in Illinois – Illinois Divorce FAQ | Divorce". Cordell & Cordell. November 12, 2021. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
  23. ↑ "Divorce and Legal Separation in Georgia". www.divorcenet.com. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
  24. ↑ "Separation and Divorce | North Carolina Judicial Branch". www.nccourts.gov. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
  25. ↑ Chapter 6 virginia.gov [ dead link ]
  26. ↑ DHS Maryland [ dead link ]
  27. ↑ "Divorce in Missouri FAQ | Frequently Asked Questions". Cordell & Cordell. November 12, 2021. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
  28. ↑ " History of Divorce in California, then and now", Domercq, 2013
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 Ehrlich, J. Shoshanna (2008). Family law for paralegals (4th ed.). New York, NY: Aspen Publishers/Wolters Kluwer. p. 163. ISBN   978-0-7355-6382-7.
  30. 1 2 3 Parkman, Allen M. (2000). Good intentions gone awry : no-fault divorce and the American family. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 190. ISBN   0-8476-9869-6.
  31. 1 2 Cruz, Peter de (2010). Family law, sex and society : a comparative study of family law. London: Routledge. p. 88. ISBN   978-0-415-48430-5.
  32. 1 2 3 4 5 Gerald D. Alpern (January 2000). Divorce Rights of Passage: A Guide Through the Emotional and Legal Realities. Wellness Institute, Inc. pp. 103–. ISBN   978-1-58741-028-4 . Retrieved November 15, 2011.
  33. ↑ Deborah Bankhead (June 12, 2018). "Grounds for Divorce". VS Family Law Group. Retrieved July 21, 2018.
  34. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Choudhri, Nihara K. (2004). The complete guide to divorce law. New York: Citadel Press. p. 8. ISBN   0-8065-2528-2.
  35. ↑ Statsky, William P. (2008). Family law (5th ed.). Australia: Delmar Cengage Learning. p. 187. ISBN   978-0-7668-3358-6.
  36. 1 2 Statsky, William P. (2008). Family law (5th ed.). Australia: Delmar Cengage Learning. p. 188. ISBN   978-0-7668-3358-6.
  37. ↑ "Constructive Desertion Law & Legal Definition". USLegal.com. USLegal, Inc. 2010. Retrieved June 11, 2012.
  38. 1 2 3 4 Benokraitis, Nijole V. (2010). Marriages & families : changes, choices, and constraints (7. ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall. p. 421. ISBN   978-0-13-243173-6.
  39. ↑ Benokraitis, Nijole V. (2010). Marriages & families : changes, choices, and constraints (7. ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall. p. 392. ISBN   978-0-13-243173-6.
  40. 1 2 3 4 Marriages and Families Census Update Changes, Choices, and Constraints. Pearson College Div. July 11, 2011. p. 422. ISBN   978-0-205-00673-1.
  41. ↑ T, Buddy. "Domestic Abuse and Alcohol" . Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  42. ↑ "Do I need to have a reason to get a divorce?" . Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  43. ↑ Graff, E.J. Melting the earth : the evolution of ideas about volcanic eruptions. Boston, Mass.: OUP USA. p. 2. ISBN   0-8070-4114-9.
  44. ↑ Nelson; Henderson (1895). A treatise on the law of divorce and annulment of marriage. Vol. 1. Callaghan. pp. 444–450. Retrieved October 9, 2011.
  45. ↑ Nelson; Henderson (1895). A treatise on the law of divorce and annulment of marriage. Vol. 1. Callaghan. p. 500. Retrieved October 9, 2011.
  46. ↑ Nelson; Henderson (1895). A treatise on the law of divorce and annulment of marriage. Vol. 1. Callaghan. pp. 420–426. Retrieved October 9, 2011.
  47. ↑ Nelson; Henderson (1895). A treatise on the law of divorce and annulment of marriage. Vol. 1. Callaghan. pp. 87–91. Retrieved October 9, 2011.
  48. 1 2 3 4 Choudhri, Nihara K. (2004). The complete guide to divorce law. New York: Citadel Press. p. 11. ISBN   0-8065-2528-2.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.