Sham marriage

Last updated
Officers from the UK Border Agency lead away the would-be bride in an operation to prevent a suspected sham marriage. Oxford sham marriage - Would-be-bride is escorted away.jpg
Officers from the UK Border Agency lead away the would-be bride in an operation to prevent a suspected sham marriage.

A sham marriage or fake marriage is a marriage of convenience entered into without intending to create a real marital relationship. This is usually for the purpose of gaining an advantage from the marriage.

Contents

Definitions of sham marriage vary by jurisdiction, but are often related to poverty. The essential point in the varying definitions is whether the couple intend to live in a real marital relationship, to establish a life together. [1] A typical definition by the UK Home Office in 2015: [2]

A sham marriage or civil partnership is one where the relationship is not genuine but one party hopes to gain an immigration advantage from it. There is no subsisting relationship, dependency, or intent to live as husband and wife or civil partners.

While referred to as a "sham" or "fake" because of its motivation, the union itself is legally valid if it conforms to the formal legal requirements for marriage in the jurisdiction. Arranging or entering into such a marriage to deceive public officials is in itself a violation of the law of some countries, for example the US.

After a period, couples often divorce if there is no purpose in remaining married. The reverse situation, in which a couple gets a divorce while continuing to live together, is called paper divorce.

Marriage fraud

Sham marriages are sometimes considered distinct from a marriage fraud, which is a type of romance scam, in which one spouse is unwittingly taken advantage of by the foreign spouse who feigns romantic interest, typically in order to obtain a residence permit or for money. [3] [4] [5]

Background

Common reasons for sham marriages are to gain immigration, [6] [7] residency, work, or citizenship rights for one of the spouses.

There have been cases of people entering into a sham marriage to avoid suspicion of homosexuality, bisexuality, etc. For example, Hollywood studios had allegedly requested homosexual/homoromantic actors, such as Rock Hudson, to conceal their homosexuality in a so-called lavender marriage.[ citation needed ]

Sham marriages have also been used to avoid military conscription in the US [8] and Israel.[ citation needed ]

Fraud

Since the intersection of citizenship-by-marriage laws and affordable international travel in the latter half of the 20th century, sham marriages have become a common method to allow a foreigner to reside, and possibly gain citizenship, in the country of the spouse. [9] The couple marries with knowledge that the marriage is solely for the purpose of obtaining the favorable immigration status, and without intending to live as a couple. This is frequently arranged as a business transaction with payment of a sum of money, and occurs more commonly with foreigners already in the country.[ citation needed ]

United Kingdom

In the UK, sham marriage is a form of immigration fraud undertaken to gain legal immigrant status. The fraud is investigated mostly by the UK Border Force and previously by the UK Border Agency.

Increases in sham marriage were reported in London boroughs such as Wandsworth. [10] In August 2010, a senior registrar in Ireland estimated that 15 percent of civil marriages were bogus, for the purpose of gaining residency. [11] Before 2010, people would need a marriage visa from their own country of origin.

In April 2011, the Border Agency issued guidance to clergy to help prevent sham marriages intended only to gain the right to reside. English and Welsh clergy may perform a marriage, according to the law there. They have been advised not to offer to publish banns for any marriage where one partner is from outside the European Union. Instead, the couple were to be asked to apply for a licence; if a member of the clergy is not satisfied that a marriage is genuine, they must make that clear to the person responsible for granting the licence. [12]

Since the Home Office hostile environment policy started in 2012, there has been criticism in the UK of heavy-handed action affecting genuine marriages. Genuine weddings have been interrupted, and dawn raids have been made to check whether couples are sharing a bed. People have been detained for months on wrongly being accused of being in a sham marriage. In 2018, 1,618 marriages reported by registrars as being suspicious were investigated; the Home Office refused to say how many were found to be sham. [13]

In 2013, the Home Office estimated that between 4,000 and 10,000 marriages per year were sham marriages entered for the purpose of gaining legal immigration status for the non-EU partner. [14]

United States

A US green card 2017-us-green-card-specimen.png
A US green card

A green card marriage is a marriage of convenience between a legal resident of the United States of America and a person who would be ineligible for residency if they were not being married to the resident. The term derives from the availability of permanent resident documents ("green cards") for spouses of legal residents in the United States, where marriage is one of the fastest and surest ways to obtain legal residence. [15] [ better source needed ] Marriages, if legitimate, entitle the spouse to live and work in the United States, as in most other countries. In the United States, 2.3 million marriage visas were approved from 1998 through 2007, representing 25% of all green cards in 2007. Even if the non-resident spouse was previously an illegal immigrant, marriage entitles the spouse to residency. [15] [ better source needed ]

Most marriages between residents and non-residents are undertaken properly, for reasons other than or in addition to residency status. That said, the practice of obtaining residency through marriage is illegal in the United States if the marriage itself is fraudulent. [16] A marriage that is solely for purposes of obtaining legal residence is considered a sham, and is a crime in the United States for both participants. [17]

Many of the arrangements are simple transactions between two individuals, often in exchange for money paid to the legal resident. In other cases the legal resident is an unwitting victim of a fraudulent marriage. [18] In yet other cases the marriages are arranged by criminal enterprises, sometimes involving the complicity of corrupt immigration officials who accept payment for describing the marriage as legitimate in immigration paperwork. [19]

Switzerland

In Switzerland, sham marriages are punished with a monetary punishment or prison if crucial information is intentionally withheld from immigration authorities, or if somebody is married to circumvent immigration laws. [20] Before 2005, being involved in a sham marriage was not punished, but the marriage was dissolved anyway if it manifested an abuse of rights – with the usual consequence that the foreigner lost his permit and had to leave the country. Marriages for any other purpose than circumventing immigration laws (e.g. avoiding inheritance taxes) are legal.

India

Matrimonial fraud [21] is heavily increasing in India. [22] Some women have been convicted of honey-trapping men into marriages, and later filing fraudulent complaints, with the goal of taking money. [23]

Legislation and investigation

In United States immigration law, marriage not made in good faith and for purposes of immigration fraud is a felony, subject to a penalty of a US$250,000 fine and five-year prison sentence on the citizen, and deportation of the foreigner. [24] In the 2009 fiscal year, 506 of the 241,154 petitions filed were denied for suspected fraud, a rate of only 0.2%. [25] U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services typically conducts an interview of marriage-based green card applicants, with additional scrutiny if they are from a developing country, have a different ethnicity or religion from their sponsor, have a large age gap with their sponsor, or have a history of prior marriage-based green card applications. [26]

In Canada, legislation on sham marriages was strengthened in 2012. [27] Continuous controversy arose regarding the issue; Canadian officials have been accused both of being too harsh and harassing couples and of being too lenient in deciding what is a genuine relationship. [28] In addition, there have been objections to the policy from women's organizations, which argued that the new policy which requires the sponsor and the new spouse to live in a "genuine relationship" for two years endangers women who are victims of domestic violence. Although there is an exception to this rule in cases of abuse, [29] the policy has been accused of being too weak (as abuse is difficult to prove). [30]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green card</span> Lawful permanent residency in the United States

A green card, known officially as a permanent resident card, is an identity document which shows that a person has permanent residency in the United States. Green card holders are formally known as lawful permanent residents (LPRs). As of 2023, there are an estimated 12.7 million green card holders, of whom 9 million are eligible to become United States citizens. Approximately 18,700 of them serve in the U.S. Armed Forces.

A marriage of convenience is a marriage contracted for reasons other than that of love and commitment. Instead, such a marriage is entered into for personal gain, or some other sort of strategic purpose, such as a political marriage. Cases where those married do not intend to live together as a couple, and typically married only for one of them to gain the right to reside in a country, are considered to be sham marriages. In many cultures, it is usual for parents to decide their adult children's marriages; this is called an arranged marriage.

Permanent residency is a person's legal resident status in a country or territory of which such person is not a citizen but where they have the right to reside on a permanent basis. This is usually for a permanent period; a person with such legal status is known as a permanent resident.

The right of abode is an individual's freedom from immigration control in a particular country. A person who has the right of abode in a country does not need permission from the government to enter the country and can live and work there without restriction, and is immune from removal and deportation.

Dual intent is a concept in United States immigration law. Typically, it refers to the fact that certain U.S. visas allow foreigners to be temporarily present in the U.S. with lawful status and immigrant intent. This allows those visa holders to enter the U.S. while simultaneously seeking lawful permanent resident status at a port of entry. Otherwise, visa holders may be presumed to have immigrant intent and can be kept from entry as a matter of law.

A K-1 visa is a visa issued to the fiancé or fiancée of a United States citizen to enter the United States. A K-1 visa requires a foreigner to marry his or her U.S. citizen petitioner within 90 days of entry, or depart the United States. Once the couple marries, the foreign citizen can adjust status to become a lawful permanent resident of the United States. Although a K-1 visa is legally classified as a non-immigrant visa, it usually leads to important immigration benefits and is therefore often processed by the Immigrant Visa section of United States embassies and consulates worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Korean nationality law</span>

The South Korean nationality law details the conditions in which an individual is a national of the Republic of Korea (ROK), commonly known as South Korea. Foreign nationals may naturalize after living in the country for at least five years and showing proficiency in the Korean language. All male citizens between the ages of 18 and 35 who are able-bodied and mentally competent are required to perform at least 18 months of compulsory military service or alternative civilian service.

In modern society, the role of marriage and its termination through divorce have become political issues. As people live increasingly mobile lives, the conflict of laws and its choice of law rules are highly relevant to determine:

Conflict of marriage laws is the conflict of laws with respect to marriage in different jurisdictions. When marriage-related issues arise between couples with diverse backgrounds, questions as to which legal systems and norms should be applied to the relationship naturally follow with various potentially applicable systems frequently conflicting with one another.

Immigration to South Korea is low due to restrictive immigration policies resulting from strong opposition to immigrants from the general Korean public. However, in recent years with the loosening of the law, influx of immigrants into South Korea has been on the rise, with foreign residents accounting for 4.9% of the total population in 2019. Between 1990 and 2020, South Korea's migrant population has grown 3.896%, second highest level of growth in the world.

Family reunification is a recognized reason for immigration in many countries because of the presence of one or more family members in a certain country, therefore, enables the rest of the divided family or only specific members of the family to emigrate to that country as well.

Marriage in the United States is a legal, social, and religious institution. The marriage age is set by each state and territory, either by statute or the common law applies. An individual may marry without parental consent or other authorization on reaching 18 years of age in all states except in Nebraska and Mississippi In Puerto Rico the general marriage age is also 21. In all these jurisdictions, these are also the ages of majority. In Alabama, however, the age of majority is 19, while the general marriage age is 18. Most states also set a lower age at which underage persons are able to marry with parental or judicial consent. Marriages where one partner is less than 18 years of age are commonly referred to as child or underage marriages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Danish nationality law</span>

Danish nationality law is governed by the Constitutional Act and the Consolidated Act of Danish Nationality. Danish nationality can be acquired in one of the following ways:

Alien registration was a system used to record information regarding aliens resident in Japan. It was handled at the municipal level, parallel to the koseki and juminhyo systems used to record information regarding Japanese nationals.

Richard Frank Adams was a Filipino-American gay rights activist. After his 1975 same-sex marriage was declared invalid for the purposes of granting his husband permanent residency, Adams filed the federal lawsuit Adams v. Howerton. This was the first lawsuit in America to seek recognition of a same-sex marriage by the federal government.

The United States policy regarding same-sex immigration denied couples in same-sex relationships the same rights and privileges afforded different-sex couples based on several court decisions and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional in United States v. Windsor on June 26, 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Form I-130</span> American immigration document

Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative is a form submitted to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services by a United States citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident petitioning for an immediate or close relative intending to immigrate to the United States. It is one of numerous USCIS immigration forms. As with all USCIS petitions, the person who submits the petition is called the petitioner and the relative on whose behalf the petition is made is called the beneficiary. The USCIS officer who evaluates the petition is called the adjudicator.

The Stokes interview is a secondary interview conducted on a couple who are trying to obtain an immigration green card in the United States on the basis of their marriage. It occurs when the immigration officer conducting the adjustment of status interview suspects that a couple's marital status is fraudulent. The Stokes interview is offered as a second chance for the couple to prove their marriage's legitimacy. What separates the Stokes interview from the initial adjustment of status interview, which is usually the only interview necessary in the process, is that during the Stokes interview couples are interviewed separately instead of together. The two interviews are recorded and compared for discrepancies. Applicants have a right to have an attorney present throughout both separate interviews. The Stokes interview is also sometimes known as a marriage fraud interview.

Salvadoran nationality law is regulated by the Constitution; the Legislative Decree 2772, commonly known as the 1933 Law on Migration, and its revisions; and the 1986 Law on Foreigner Issues. These laws determine who is, or is eligible to be, a citizen of El Salvador. The legal means to acquire nationality and formal membership in a nation differ from the relationship of rights and obligations between a national and the nation, known as citizenship. Salvadoran nationality is typically obtained either on the principle of jus soli, i.e. by birth in El Salvador; or under the rules of jus sanguinis, i.e. by birth abroad to a parent with Salvadoran nationality. It can also be granted to a citizen of any Central American state, or a permanent resident who has lived in the country for a given period of time through naturalization.

A family visa is a type of immigration visa issued by the governments of various countries for family reunification purposes in a foreign country.

References

  1. ↑ Law Offices of Susan V. Perez. "A Bad Marriage Is Not the Same as a Sham Marriage". HG.org. Retrieved 14 April 2019.
  2. ↑ "Criminal investigation: sham marriage" (PDF). UK Government - Home Office. 19 August 2015. Retrieved 14 April 2019.
  3. ↑ "Victims of Immigration Fraud". voif.org. Retrieved 23 May 2018.
  4. ↑ "Romance Scams". Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved 23 May 2018.
  5. ↑ Canada, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship (9 October 2009). "Protect yourself from marriage fraud - Canada.ca". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 23 May 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ↑ "Owner of Thai Ginger admits to immigration fraud – paying people to 'marry' her relatives". Bellevue Reporter. 2009-10-23. Archived from the original on 2009-10-28. Retrieved 2011-04-11.
  7. ↑ "Thai Ginger owner sentenced for sham-marriage scheme". Seattle Times. 2010-02-19. Retrieved 2011-04-11.
  8. ↑ Orvedahl, Reid (2001-02-01). "PrimeTime: Marrying to Avoid Draft". ABC News. Retrieved 15 August 2023.
  9. ↑ Walter, Sim. "Convictions for bogus marriages soar to 284: ICA" . Retrieved 26 June 2014.
  10. ↑ "Rise in sham marriages to beat UK immigration laws". BBC News. 7 January 2010.
  11. ↑ "Registrar warns of rapid rise in 'sham marriages'". The Irish Times. 17 August 2010. Archived from the original on 22 February 2011. Retrieved 3 August 2024.
  12. ↑ "Bishops act to tackle sham marriages". homeoffice.gov.uk. 11 April 2011.
  13. ↑ "Couples face 'insulting' checks in sham marriage crackdown". The Observer. 14 April 2019.
  14. ↑ Wright, Robert (9 September 2018). "Crackdown on sham marriages leaves migrants in limbo" . Financial Times. Archived from the original on 11 December 2022. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  15. 1 2 David Seminara (November 2008). "Hello, I Love You, Won't You Tell Me Your Name: Inside the Green Card Marriage Phenomenon". Center for Immigration Studies.
  16. ↑ "Man pleads not guilty in alleged Internet green card marriage". Associated Press. 2007-12-31.
  17. ↑ Scott Glover (2007-12-07). "Pair arrested in green card marriage that resulted from Web ads". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2014-08-05.
  18. ↑ Greg Gordon (1997-09-27). "For love or a green card? As tougher INS laws loom: Minnesotan tells her story". Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Archived from the original on 2012-10-25.
  19. ↑ Bill Hutchinson (2006-06-08). "Immig officer & sis held in scam". New York Daily news.
  20. ↑ "Federal Act on Foreign Nationals and Integration". Swiss Confederation. 2023-04-01. Retrieved 2023-05-24. Article 118.
  21. ↑ "Speedy Justice: The Absolute Essentiality in Divorce Cases in Karnataka". www.daijiworld.com. Retrieved 2024-09-05.
  22. ↑ Bhattacharjee, Sumit (2018-06-15). "Matrimonial frauds on the rise". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 2024-08-30.
  23. ↑ Swamy,DHNS, H. M. Chaithanya. "Woman arrested for honey-trapping men she found on matrimonial site". Deccan Herald. Retrieved 2024-08-30.
  24. ↑ "Just Say No to Immigration Marriage Fraud". The Law Office of Tanya M. Lee. Retrieved 2012-05-23.
  25. ↑ "Investigating Marriage Fraud in New York". Ny Times. June 11, 2010. Retrieved 2 April 2013.
  26. ↑ "Red Flags for "Marriage Fraud" in the US" . Retrieved 2021-01-02.
  27. ↑ "Marriage fraud". cic.gc.ca. 9 October 2009.
  28. ↑ "Marriage fraud: Canadian immigration officials tread thin line". thestar.com. 29 April 2013.
  29. ↑ "Backgrounder — Conditional Permanent Resident Status". cic.gc.ca. 26 October 2012.
  30. ↑ "Canadian immigration changes force women to stay with sponsoring spouse for two years". thestar.com. 5 December 2012.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.