Hartman effect

Last updated

The Hartman effect describes how the delay time for a quantum tunneling particle is independent of the thickness of the opaque barrier. It is named after Thomas Hartman, who discovered it in 1962. [1]

Contents

Overview

The Hartman effect is the tunneling effect through a barrier where the tunneling time tends to a constant for thick enough barriers. This was first described by Thomas E. Hartman in 1962. [1] Although the effect was first predicted for quantum particles governed by the Schrödinger equation, it also exists for classical electromagnetic wave packets tunneling as evanescent waves through electromagnetic barriers. [2] This is because the Helmholtz equation for electromagnetic waves and the time-independent Schrödinger equation have the same form. Since tunneling is a wave phenomenon, it occurs for all kinds of waves - matter waves, electromagnetic waves, and even sound waves. Hence the Hartman effect should exist for all tunneling waves.

There is no unique and universally accepted definition of "tunneling time" in physics. This is because time is not an operator in quantum mechanics, unlike other quantities like position and momentum. Among the many candidates for "tunneling time" are (i) the group delay or phase time, (ii) the dwell time, (iii) the Larmor times, (iv) the Büttiker–Landauer time, and (v) the semiclassical time. [3] [4] Three of these tunneling times (group delay, dwell time, and Larmor time) exhibit the Hartman effect, in the sense that they saturate at a constant value as the barrier thickness is increased. If the tunneling time T remains fixed as the barrier thickness L is increased, then the tunneling velocity v = L/T will ultimately become unbounded. The Hartman effect thus leads to predictions of anomalously large, and even superluminal tunneling velocities in the limit of thick barriers. However, more recent rigorous analysis proves that the process is entirely subluminal. [5]

Experimental verification of Hartman effect

Tunneling time experiments with quantum particles like electrons are extremely difficult, not only because of the timescales (attoseconds) and length scales (sub-nanometre) involved, but also because of possible confounding interactions with the environment that have nothing to do with the actual tunneling process itself. As a result, the only experimental observations of the Hartman effect have been based on electromagnetic analogs to quantum tunneling. The first experimental verification of the Hartman effect was by Enders and Nimtz, who used a microwave waveguide with a narrowed region that served as a barrier to waves with frequencies below the cutoff frequency in that region. [6] [7] They measured the frequency-dependent phase shift of continuous wave (cw) microwaves transmitted by the structure. They found that the frequency-dependent phase shift was independent of the length of the barrier region. Since the group delay (phase time) is the derivative of the phase shift with respect to frequency, this independence of the phase shift means that the group delay is independent of barrier length, a confirmation of the Hartman effect. They also found that the measured group delay was shorter than the transit time L/c for a pulse travelling at the speed of light c over the same barrier distance L in vacuum. From this, it was inferred that the tunneling of evanescent waves is superluminal, despite it is now known on rigorous mathematical grounds that the relativistic quantum tunneling (modeled using the Dirac equation) is a subluminal process. [5]

At optical frequencies the electromagnetic analogs to quantum tunneling involve wave propagation in photonic bandgap structures and frustrated total internal reflection at the interface between two prisms in close contact. Spielmann, et al. sent 12 fs (FWHM) laser pulses through the stop band of a multilayer dielectric structure. [8] They found that the measured group delay was independent of the number of layers, or equivalently, the thickness of the photonic barrier, thus confirming the Hartman effect for tunneling light waves. In another optical experiment, Longhi, et al. sent 380-ps wide laser pulses through the stop band of a fiber Bragg grating (FBG). [9] They measured the group delay of the transmitted pulses for gratings of length 1.3 cm, 1.6 cm, and 2 cm and found that the delay saturated with length L in a manner described by the function tanh(qL), where q is the grating coupling constant. This is another confirmation of the Hartman effect. The inferred tunneling group velocity was faster than that of a reference pulse propagating in a fiber without a barrier and also increased with FBG length, or equivalently, the reflectivity.

In a different approach to optical tunneling, Balcou and Dutriaux measured the group delay associated with light transport across a small gap between two prisms. [10] When a light beam travelling through a prism impinges upon the glass-air interface at an angle greater than a certain critical angle, it undergoes total internal reflection and no energy is transmitted into the air. However, when another prism is brought very close (within a wavelength) to the first prism, light can tunnel across the gap and carry energy into the second prism. This phenomenon is known as frustrated total internal reflection (FTIR) and is an optical analog of quantum tunneling. Balcou and Dutriaux obtained the group delay from a measurement of the beam shift (known as the Goos–Hänchen shift) during FTIR. They found that the group delay saturates with the separation between the prisms, thus confirming the Hartman effect. They also found that the group delays were equal for both transmitted and reflected beams, a result that is predicted for symmetric barriers.

The Hartman effect has also been observed with acoustic waves. Yang, et al. propagated ultrasound pulses through 3d phononic crystals made of tungsten carbide beads in water. [11] For frequencies inside the stop band they found that the group delay saturated with sample thickness. By converting the delay to a velocity through v = L/T, they found a group velocity that increases with sample thickness. In another experiment, Robertson, et al. created a periodic acoustic waveguide structure with an acoustic bandgap for audio frequency pulses. [12] They found that inside the stop band the acoustic group delay was relatively insensitive to the length of the structure, a verification of the Hartman effect. Furthermore, the group velocity increased with length and was greater than the speed of sound, a phenomenon they refer to as "breaking the sound barrier."

Origin of the Hartman effect

Why does the tunneling time of a particle or wave packet become independent of barrier width for thick enough barriers? The origin of the Hartman effect had been a mystery for decades. If the tunneling time becomes independent of barrier width, the implication is that the wave packet speeds up as the barrier is made longer. Not only does it speed up, but it speeds up by just the right amount to traverse the increased distance in the same amount of time. In 2002 Herbert Winful showed that the group delay for a photonic bandgap structure is identical to the dwell time which is proportional to the stored energy in the barrier. [13] In fact, the dwell time is the stored energy divided by the input power. In the stop band, the electric field is an exponentially decaying function of distance. The stored energy is proportional to the integral of the square of the field. This integral, the area under a decaying exponential, becomes independent of length for a long enough barrier. The group delay saturates because the stored energy saturates. He redefined the group delay in tunneling as the lifetime of stored energy escaping through both ends. [14] This interpretation of group delay as a lifetime also explains why the transmission and reflection group delays are equal for a symmetric barrier. He pointed out that the tunnelling time is not a propagation delay and "should not be linked to a velocity since evanescent waves do not propagate". [15] In other papers Winful extended his analysis to quantum (as opposed to electromagnetic) tunneling and showed that the group delay is equal to the dwell time plus a self-interference delay, both of which are proportional to the integrated probability density and hence saturate with barrier length. [16]

Related Research Articles

Faster-than-light travel and communication are the conjectural propagation of matter or information faster than the speed of light. The special theory of relativity implies that only particles with zero rest mass may travel at the speed of light, and that nothing may travel faster.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Group velocity</span> Physical quantity

The group velocity of a wave is the velocity with which the overall envelope shape of the wave's amplitudes—known as the modulation or envelope of the wave—propagates through space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Speed of light</span> Speed of electromagnetic waves in vacuum

The speed of light in vacuum, commonly denoted c, is a universal physical constant that is exactly equal to 299,792,458 metres per second. According to the special theory of relativity, c is the upper limit for the speed at which conventional matter or energy can travel through space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ionization</span> Process by which atoms or molecules acquire charge by gaining or losing electrons

Ionization is the process by which an atom or a molecule acquires a negative or positive charge by gaining or losing electrons, often in conjunction with other chemical changes. The resulting electrically charged atom or molecule is called an ion. Ionization can result from the loss of an electron after collisions with subatomic particles, collisions with other atoms, molecules, electrons, positrons, protons, antiprotons and ions, or through the interaction with electromagnetic radiation. Heterolytic bond cleavage and heterolytic substitution reactions can result in the formation of ion pairs. Ionization can occur through radioactive decay by the internal conversion process, in which an excited nucleus transfers its energy to one of the inner-shell electrons causing it to be ejected.

Matter waves are a central part of the theory of quantum mechanics, being half of wave–particle duality. At all scales where measurements have been practical, matter exhibits wave-like behavior. For example, a beam of electrons can be diffracted just like a beam of light or a water wave.

In physics, coherence expresses the potential for two waves to interfere. Two monochromatic beams from a single source always interfere. Physical sources are not strictly monochromatic: they may be partly coherent. Beams from different sources are mutually incoherent.

In physics, quantum tunnelling, barrier penetration, or simply tunnelling is a quantum mechanical phenomenon in which an object such as an electron or atom passes through a potential energy barrier that, according to classical mechanics, should not be passable due to the object not having sufficient energy to pass or surmount the barrier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum Zeno effect</span> Quantum measurement phenomenon

The quantum Zeno effect is a feature of quantum-mechanical systems allowing a particle's time evolution to be slowed down by measuring it frequently enough with respect to some chosen measurement setting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metamaterial</span> Materials engineered to have properties that have not yet been found in nature

A metamaterial is a type of material engineered to have a property that is rarely observed in naturally occurring materials. They are made from assemblies of multiple elements fashioned from composite materials such as metals and plastics. These materials are usually arranged in repeating patterns, at scales that are smaller than the wavelengths of the phenomena they influence. Metamaterials derive their properties not from the properties of the base materials, but from their newly designed structures. Their precise shape, geometry, size, orientation and arrangement gives them their smart properties capable of manipulating electromagnetic waves: by blocking, absorbing, enhancing, or bending waves, to achieve benefits that go beyond what is possible with conventional materials.


Stochastic electrodynamics (SED) is extends classical electrodynamics (CED) of theoretical physics by adding the hypothesis of a classical Lorentz invariant radiation field having statistical properties similar to that of the electromagnetic zero-point field (ZPF) of quantum electrodynamics (QED).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optical parametric oscillator</span>

An optical parametric oscillator (OPO) is a parametric oscillator that oscillates at optical frequencies. It converts an input laser wave with frequency into two output waves of lower frequency by means of second-order nonlinear optical interaction. The sum of the output waves' frequencies is equal to the input wave frequency: . For historical reasons, the two output waves are called "signal" and "idler", where the output wave with higher frequency is the "signal". A special case is the degenerate OPO, when the output frequency is one-half the pump frequency, , which can result in half-harmonic generation when signal and idler have the same polarization.

Slow light is the propagation of an optical pulse or other modulation of an optical carrier at a very low group velocity. Slow light occurs when a propagating pulse is substantially slowed by the interaction with the medium in which the propagation takes place.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Günter Nimtz</span> German physicist

Günter Nimtz is a German physicist, working at the 2nd Physics Institute at the University of Cologne in Germany. He has investigated narrow-gap semiconductors and liquid crystals. His claims show that particles may travel faster than the speed of light when undergoing quantum tunneling.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert W. Boyd</span> American physicist

Robert William Boyd is an American physicist noted for his work in optical physics and especially in nonlinear optics. He is currently the Canada Excellence Research Chair Laureate in Quantum Nonlinear Optics based at the University of Ottawa, professor of physics cross-appointed to the school of electrical engineering and computer science at the University of Ottawa, and professor of optics and professor of physics at the University of Rochester.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modern searches for Lorentz violation</span> Tests of special relativity

Modern searches for Lorentz violation are scientific studies that look for deviations from Lorentz invariance or symmetry, a set of fundamental frameworks that underpin modern science and fundamental physics in particular. These studies try to determine whether violations or exceptions might exist for well-known physical laws such as special relativity and CPT symmetry, as predicted by some variations of quantum gravity, string theory, and some alternatives to general relativity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry Friedmann</span> Israeli chemist (1931–2018)

Harry Friedmann was a professor of chemistry who specialized in theoretical nonlinear optics and lasers in biology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carlos Stroud</span> American physicist

Carlos Ray Stroud, Jr. is an American physicist and educator. Working in the field of quantum optics, Stroud has carried out theoretical and experimental studies in most areas of the field from its beginnings in the late 1960s, studying the fundamentals of the quantum mechanics of atoms and light and their interaction. He has authored over 140 peer-reviewed papers and edited seven books. He is a fellow of the American Physical Society and the Optical Society of America, as well as a Distinguished Traveling Lecturer of the Division of Laser Science of the American Physical Society. In this latter position he travels to smaller colleges giving colloquia and public lectures.

Photonic topological insulators are artificial electromagnetic materials that support topologically non-trivial, unidirectional states of light. Photonic topological phases are classical electromagnetic wave analogues of electronic topological phases studied in condensed matter physics. Similar to their electronic counterparts, they, can provide robust unidirectional channels for light propagation. The field that studies these phases of light is referred to as topological photonics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbert Winful</span> Ghanaian-American engineering professor (born 1952)

Herbert Graves Winful is a Ghanaian-American engineering professor, whose honours include in 2020 the Quantum Electronics Award. He is the Joseph E. and Anne P. Rowe Professor of Electrical Engineering, Arthur F. Thurnau Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and a Professor of Physics at the University of Michigan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-linear inverse Compton scattering</span> Electron-many photon scattering

Non-linear inverse Compton scattering (NICS), also known as non-linear Compton scattering and multiphoton Compton scattering, is the scattering of multiple low-energy photons, given by an intense electromagnetic field, in a high-energy photon during the interaction with a charged particle, in many cases an electron. This process is an inverted variant of Compton scattering since, contrary to it, the charged particle transfers its energy to the outgoing high-energy photon instead of receiving energy from an incoming high-energy photon. Furthermore, differently from Compton scattering, this process is explicitly non-linear because the conditions for multiphoton absorption by the charged particle are reached in the presence of a very intense electromagnetic field, for example, the one produced by high-intensity lasers.

References

  1. 1 2 T. E. Hartman (1962). "Tunneling of a wave packet". Journal of Applied Physics . 33 (12): 3427. Bibcode:1962JAP....33.3427H. doi:10.1063/1.1702424.
  2. ↑ J. J. Hupert and G. Ott (1966). "Electromagnetic analog of the quantum-mechanical tunnel effect". American Journal of Physics . 34 (3): 3427. Bibcode:1966AmJPh..34..260H. doi:10.1119/1.1972898.
  3. ↑ E. H. Hauge and J. A. Stovneng (1989). "Tunneling times: a critical review". Reviews of Modern Physics . 61 (4): 917. Bibcode:1989RvMP...61..917H. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.917.
  4. ↑ H. Winful (2006). "Tunneling time, the Hartman effect, and superluminality: A proposed resolution of an old paradox" (PDF). Physics Reports . 436 (1–2): 1–69. Bibcode:2006PhR...436....1W. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.09.002. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-03-25. Retrieved 2016-07-30.
  5. 1 2 Gavassino, L.; Disconzi, M. M. (2023-03-13). "Subluminality of relativistic quantum tunneling". Physical Review A. 107 (3): 032209. arXiv: 2208.09742 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.032209.
  6. ↑ A. Enders and G. Nimtz (1992). "On superluminal barrier traversal". Journal de Physique I . 2 (9): 1693–1698. Bibcode:1992JPhy1...2.1693E. doi:10.1051/jp1:1992236.
  7. ↑ A. Enders and G. Nimtz (1993). "Evanescent-mode propagation and quantum tunneling". Physical Review E . 48 (1): 632–634. Bibcode:1993PhRvE..48..632E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.48.632. PMID   9960633.
  8. ↑ C. Spielmann, R. Szipocs, A. Stingl, F. Krausz (1994). "Tunneling of optical pulses through photonic band-gaps". Physical Review Letters . 73 (17): 2308–2311. Bibcode:1994PhRvL..73.2308S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2308. PMID   10057027.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. ↑ S. Longhi, M. Marano, P. Laporta, M. Belmonte (2001). "Superluminal optical pulse propagation at 1.5 μm in periodic fiber Bragg gratings". Physical Review E . 64 (5): 055602. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.055602. PMID   11736006.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. ↑ P. Balcou and L. Dutriaux (1997). "Dual optical tunneling times in frustrated total internal reflection". Physical Review Letters . 78 (5): 851–854. Bibcode:1997PhRvL..78..851B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.851.
  11. ↑ S. Yang, J. Page, Z. Liu, M. Cowan, C. Chan, P. Sheng (2002). "Ultrasound tunneling through 3D phononic crystals". Physical Review Letters . 88 (10): 104301. Bibcode:2002PhRvL..88j4301Y. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.104301. PMID   11909358.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ↑ W. Robertson, J. Ash, J. McGaugh (2002). "Breaking the sound barrier: Tunneling of acoustic waves through the forbidden transmission region of a one-dimensional acoustic band gap array". American Journal of Physics . 70 (7): 689. Bibcode:2002AmJPh..70..689R. doi:10.1119/1.1477430.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ↑ H. Winful (2002). "Energy storage in superluminal barrier tunneling: origin of the "Hartman Effect"". Optics Express . 10 (25): 1491–1496. Bibcode:2002OExpr..10.1491W. doi: 10.1364/OE.10.001491 . PMID   19461683.
  14. ↑ H. Winful (2003). "The meaning of group delay in barrier tunneling: a re-examination of superluminal group velocities". New Journal of Physics . 8 (6): 101. arXiv: quant-ph/0601085 . doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/8/6/101 .
  15. ↑ H. Winful (2006). "Tunneling time, the Hartman effect, and superluminality: A proposed resolution of an old paradox" (PDF). Physics Reports . 436 (1–2): 1–69. Bibcode:2006PhR...436....1W. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.09.002. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-03-25. Retrieved 2016-07-30.
  16. ↑ H. Winful (2003). "Delay time and the Hartman effect in quantum tunneling". Physical Review Letters . 91 (26): 26041. Bibcode:2003PhRvL..91z0401W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.260401. PMID   14754030.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.