How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

Last updated
Photograph at 10x magnification of the head of a size #2 insect pin. Taken by Hugo Sappington at the Essig Museum of Entomology, using a Macropod Micro Kit. Head of a Pin, 10x magnification.jpg
Photograph at 10x magnification of the head of a size #2 insect pin. Taken by Hugo Sappington at the Essig Museum of Entomology, using a Macropod Micro Kit.

Illustration of a pin with a head shaped like a Cherub, from Illustrerad verldshistoria by E. Wallis, volume I, published 1875 Illustrerad Verldshistoria band I Ill 158.png
Illustration of a pin with a head shaped like a Cherub, from Illustrerad verldshistoria by E. Wallis, volume I, published 1875

"How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" (alternatively "How many angels can stand on the point of a pin?") is a phrase that when used in modern contexts can be used as a metaphor for wasting time debating topics of no practical value or on questions whose answers hold no intellectual consequence when more urgent concerns accumulate. [1]

Contents

The phrase was originally used in a theological context by 17th-century Protestants to mock medieval scholastics such as Duns Scotus [2] and Thomas Aquinas. [3] Whether medieval scholastics really discussed the topic is, however, a matter of debate. The suggestion is possibly an early modern invention that was intended to discredit scholastic philosophy. [4]

The phrase has also been associated with the fall of Constantinople, with the assertion that scholars debated the topic while the Ottoman Empire besieged the city. [5] [6] In Italian, [7] French, [8] Spanish and Portuguese, the conundrum of useless scholarly debates is linked to a similar question of whether or not angels are sexless. [6] In Polish, the question is about devils instead of angels.

Origin

Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologica , written c.1270, includes discussion of several questions regarding angels such as "Can several angels be in the same place?". [2] However, evidence that the question was widely debated in medieval scholarship is lacking. [4] One theory is that it is an early modern fabrication [lower-alpha 1] that was used to discredit scholastic philosophy while it still played a significant role in university education.

James Franklin raised the scholarly issue mentioned a 17th-century reference in William Chillingworth's Religion of Protestants (1637) [9] accusing unnamed scholastics of debating "whether a Million of Angels may not fit upon a Needle's point." That is earlier than a reference in the 1678 The True Intellectual System of the Universe by Ralph Cudworth.

Helen S. Lang, author of Aristotle's Physics and its Medieval Varieties (1992), stated:

The question of how many angels can dance on the point of a needle, or the head of a pin, is often attributed to 'late medieval writers'.... In point of fact, the question has never been found in this form….

(p. 284)

Peter Harrison (2016) has suggested that the first reference to angels dancing on a needle's point occurs in an expository work by an English priest, William Sclater (1575–1626) [10] in his An Exposition with Notes upon the First Epistle to the Thessalonians (1619). Sclater claimed that scholastic philosophers occupied themselves with such pointless questions as whether angels "did occupie a place; and so, whether many might be in one place at one time; and how many might sit on a Needles point; and six hundred such like needlesse points." [11] Harrison proposed that the reason for an English writer to introduce the "needle’s point" for the first time to a critique of medieval angelology is that it makes for a pun on "needless point". [10]

A letter written to The Times in 1975 [12] identified a close parallel in a 14th-century mystical text, the Swester Katrei . However, the reference is to souls sitting on a needle: tusent selen siczen in dem himelrich uff einer nadel spicz — "in heaven a thousand souls can sit on the point of a needle." [13]

Dorothy L. Sayers argued that the question was "simply a debating exercise" and that the answer that was "usually adjudged correct" was stated, "Angels are pure intelligences, not material, but limited, so that they have location in space, but not extension." [14] Sayers compares the question to that of how many people's thoughts can be concentrated upon a particular pin at the same time. She concludes that infinitely many angels can be located on the head of a pin since they do not occupy any space there:

The practical lesson to be drawn from the argument is not to use words like "there" in a loose, unscientific way, without specifying whether you mean "located there" or "occupying space there." [14]

See also

Notes

  1. More precisely in play in the 17th century and discussed at various levels by Cambridge Platonists: Ralph Cudworth, Henry More, and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nominalism</span> Philosophy emphasizing names and labels

In metaphysics, nominalism is the view that universals and abstract objects do not actually exist other than being merely names or labels. There are at least two main versions of nominalism. One version denies the existence of universals – things that can be instantiated or exemplified by many particular things. The other version specifically denies the existence of abstract objects – objects that do not exist in space and time.

In the philosophy of mathematics, the abstraction of actual infinity, also called completed infinity, involves infinite entities as given, actual and completed objects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scholasticism</span> Medieval school of philosophy

Scholasticism was a medieval school of philosophy that employed a critical organic method of philosophical analysis predicated upon Aristotelianism and the Ten Categories. Christian scholasticism emerged within the monastic schools that translated scholastic Judeo-Islamic philosophies, and "rediscovered" the collected works of Aristotle. Endeavoring to harmonize his metaphysics and its account of a prime mover with the Latin Catholic dogmatic trinitarian theology, these monastic schools became the basis of the earliest European medieval universities, and thus became the bedrock for the development of modern science and philosophy in the Western world. Scholasticism dominated education in Europe from about 1100 to 1700. The rise of scholasticism was closely associated with these schools that flourished in Italy, France, Portugal, Spain and England.

In classical rhetoric and logic, begging the question or assuming the conclusion is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion. Historically, begging the question refers to a fault in a dialectical argument in which the speaker assumes some premise that has not been demonstrated to be true. In modern usage, it has come to refer to an argument in which the premises assume the conclusion without supporting it. This makes it an example of circular reasoning.

Reality is the sum or aggregate of all that is real or existent within the universe, as opposed to that which is only imaginary, nonexistent or nonactual. The term is also used to refer to the ontological status of things, indicating their existence. In physical terms, reality is the totality of a system, known and unknown.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexuality in Christian demonology</span>

To Sumerians, Babylonians, Assyrians, and Jews there were male and female demons. In Christian demonology and theology there is debate over the gender and sexual proclivities of demons. These questions are referenced in Italian, French, Spanish and Portuguese phrases that imply that the question is pointless and unanswerable, akin to the English phrase How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry More</span> English philosopher (1614–1687)

Henry More was an English philosopher of the Cambridge Platonist school.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Natural philosophy</span> Philosophical study of nature

Natural philosophy or philosophy of nature is the philosophical study of physics, that is, nature and the physical universe. It was dominant before the development of modern science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euthyphro dilemma</span> Ethical problem on the origin of morality posed by Socrates

The Euthyphro dilemma is found in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro, in which Socrates asks Euthyphro, "Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" (10a)

Pinhead (<i>Hellraiser</i>) Fictional character in the Hellraiser franchise

Pinhead is a fictional character and the main antagonist of the Hellraiser franchise. The character first appeared as an unnamed figure in the 1986 Clive Barker novella The Hellbound Heart. When Clive Barker adapted the novella into the 1987 film Hellraiser, he referred to the character in early drafts as "the Priest" but the final film gave no name. The production and make-up crew nicknamed the character "Pinhead"—derived from his bald head studded with nails—and fans accepted the sobriquet. The name was then used in press materials, tie-in media, and on-screen in some of the film's sequels, although Barker himself despises the moniker.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oxford Calculators</span> Group of 14th-century English mathematicians and philosophers

The Oxford Calculators were a group of 14th-century thinkers, almost all associated with Merton College, Oxford; for this reason they were dubbed "The Merton School". These men took a strikingly logical and mathematical approach to philosophical problems. The key "calculators", writing in the second quarter of the 14th century, were Thomas Bradwardine, William Heytesbury, Richard Swineshead and John Dumbleton. Using the slightly earlier works of Walter Burley, Gerard of Brussels, and Nicole Oresme, these individuals expanded upon the concepts of 'latitudes' and what real world applications they could apply them to.

An appeal to nature is a rhetorical technique for presenting and proposing the argument that "a thing is good because it is 'natural', or bad because it is 'unnatural'." In debate and discussion, an appeal-to-nature argument can be considered to be a bad argument, because the implicit primary premise "What is natural is good" has no factual meaning beyond rhetoric in some or most contexts.

Philosophy of language investigates the nature of language and the relations between language, language users, and the world. Investigations may include inquiry into the nature of meaning, intentionality, reference, the constitution of sentences, concepts, learning, and thought.

<i>Sister Catherine Treatise</i> Work of medieval Christian mysticism

The Sister Catherine Treatise is a work of medieval Christian mysticism seen as representative of the Heresy of the Free Spirit of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries in Europe. Wrongly attributed to Christian mystic Meister Eckhart, it nevertheless shows the influence of his ideas or at least the ideas which he was accused or attributed as having had by the Inquisition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cartesianism</span> Philosophical and scientific system of René Descartes

Cartesianism is the philosophical and scientific system of René Descartes and its subsequent development by other seventeenth century thinkers, most notably François Poullain de la Barre, Nicolas Malebranche and Baruch Spinoza. Descartes is often regarded as the first thinker to emphasize the use of reason to develop the natural sciences. For him, philosophy was a thinking system that embodied all knowledge.

The Isagoge or "Introduction" to Aristotle's "Categories", written by Porphyry in Greek and translated into Latin by Boethius, was the standard textbook on logic for at least a millennium after his death. It was composed by Porphyry in Sicily during the years 268–270, and sent to Chrysaorium, according to all the ancient commentators Ammonius, Elias, and David. The work includes the highly influential hierarchical classification of genera and species from substance in general down to individuals, known as the Tree of Porphyry, and an introduction which mentions the problem of universals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aevum</span> Concept in Scholastic philosophy

In scholastic philosophy, the aevum is the temporal mode of existence experienced by angels and by the saints in heaven. In some ways, it is a state that logically lies between the eternity (timelessness) of God and the temporal experience of material beings. It is sometimes referred to as "improper eternity".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medieval philosophy</span> Philosophy during the medieval period

Medieval philosophy is the philosophy that existed through the Middle Ages, the period roughly extending from the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century until after the Renaissance in the 13th and 14th centuries. Medieval philosophy, understood as a project of independent philosophical inquiry, began in Baghdad, in the middle of the 8th century, and in France and Germany, in the itinerant court of Charlemagne in Aachen, in the last quarter of the 8th century. It is defined partly by the process of rediscovering the ancient culture developed in Greece and Rome during the Classical period, and partly by the need to address theological problems and to integrate sacred doctrine with secular learning. This is one of the defining characteristics in this time period. Understanding God was the focal point of study of the philosophers at that time, Muslim and Christian alike.

References

  1. Hirsch, E. D. Jr.; Kett, Joseph F.; Trefil, James (eds.). The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy.
  2. 1 2 Summa, New advent, archived from the original on 6 July 2013, retrieved 22 October 2013.
  3. Kennedy, D. J., "Thomism" Archived 7 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine , in the Catholic Encyclopedia )
  4. 1 2 Van Asselt, Willem J (2011). Introduction to Reformed Scholasticism. p. 65.
  5. "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?". Today's Zaman. Archived from the original on 13 December 2014.
  6. 1 2 Ramírez, José A. (1975). Las Andanzas Del Diablo: Confidencias de un Abogado Ingenuo [The Adventures of the Devil: Confidences of a Naive Lawyer]. Editorial Planeta. p. 58. ISBN   9788432053375. Archived from the original on 7 April 2023. Retrieved 24 September 2020 via books.google.com.
  7. "Angelo" [Angel]. Dizionario dei modi di dire (Dictionary of idioms) - Corriere.it (in Italian). Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 13 July 2017.
  8. "Discuter sur le sexe des anges" [Chat on the sex of angels]. L'Internaute. CCM Benchmark. Archived from the original on 14 November 2020. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
  9. Franklin 1993 p. 127.
  10. 1 2 Peter Harrison, "Angels on Pinheads and Needles’ Points" Archived 2022-04-14 at the Wayback Machine , Notes and Queries, 63 (2016), 45–47.
  11. William Sclater, An Exposition with Notes Upon the First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians, p 385. Archived 21 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine (Google Books)
  12. Sylla, E. D. (2005). "Swester Katrei and Gregory of Rimini: Angels, God, and Mathematics in the Fourteenth Century". In Koetsier, S.; Bergmans (eds.). Mathematics and the Divine: A Historical Study. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 251. ISBN   0444503285. Archived from the original on 7 April 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  13. Ross, George MacDonald (October 1985). "Angels". Philosophy . 60 (234): 495–511. doi:10.1017/S0031819100042534. S2CID   241590062. Archived from the original on 9 June 2018. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
  14. 1 2 Sayers, Dorothy L. "The Lost Tools of Learning". Gbt.org. Archived from the original on 16 December 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2012.

Further reading