IDEA Fairness Restoration Act

Last updated

The IDEA Fairness Restoration Act is an American legislative proposal first introduced in the United States House of Representatives on November 14, 2007, as H.R.4188. [1] The bill was most recently reintroduced on March 17, 2011, in the Senate as S.613 [2] and in the House as H.R. 1208 [3] The primary sponsors are Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA), Chair of the Senate Health Education Labor and Pensions Committee, [2] Congressmen Chris Van Hollen (D-CT), and Congressman Pete Sessions (R-TX). [3] The bill would enable parents of children with disabilities to recover their expert witness fees in due process hearings under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). [4]

Contents

Background

When a school district fails its legal obligations to students with disabilities, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act permits the parent to seek a hearing before an impartial hearing officer. A school district may also request a due process hearing against parents. [5] Hearings are rare. Only 5 in 10,000 students seek a hearing. [6]

Expert witnesses have a critical role at due process hearings. They provide the technical expertise about the student’s disability and the care and educational services the student needs in the classroom. [4]

In 1986, Congress passed the Handicapped Children’s Protection Act, allowing parents who prevail in due process hearings and litigation under the IDEA to recover their legal fees and costs. The language was modeled on similar provisions in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5k). [7] Congress’ Joint Conference Committee Report explained that the courts would have discretion to award attorneys’ fees as part of the costs of litigation. It noted that “The conferees intend that the term ‘attorneys’ fees as part of the costs’ include reasonable expenses and fees of expert witnesses and the reasonable costs of any test or evaluation which is found to be necessary for the preparation of the parent or guardian’s case in the action or proceeding.” [8] The statute also directed the GAO to study the costs to parents, including costs of “attorneys and consultants” in IDEA proceedings. [9]

In 2006, however, the Supreme Court decided the case of Arlington Central School Dist. Bd. of Ed. v. Murphy. The Court ruled that because the statutory text of the IDEA did not explicitly state that expert witness fees were covered, parents could not recover them. The Court reasoned that because the IDEA was enacted under the Spending Clause of the Constitution, Article I, Section 8, the law must “unambiguously” give notice in its statutory text that parents could recover fees. This meant Congress had to declare in the body of the statute that parents could recover expert witness fees. [10] The IDEA Fairness Restoration Act will amend the statutory text of the IDEA to permit recovery of expert witness fees. Until Congress does, parents must pay their own expert witness fee expenses, even when they prevail. [11]

Description of the Bill

The IDEA permits parents who prevail in IDEA cases to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees. [12] The IDEA Fairness Restoration Act will enable them to also recover the reasonable costs of expert witnesses. It will amend Section 615(i)(3) of the IDEA by adding the following at the end, “Inclusion of expert witness fees and other expenses as attorneys' fees. In this paragraph, the term ‘attorneys' fees’ shall include the fees of expert witnesses, including the reasonable costs of any test or evaluation necessary for the preparation of the parent or guardian's case in the action or proceeding.” [2] Parents can recover expert witness fees only when they prevail, and the school system has been found, after an impartial hearing, to have wrongfully denied a child an appropriate education as defined in IDEA. fees. Parents cannot recover fees if they do not prevail. [13]

The bill will align the IDEA with other civil rights statutes that permit recovery of expert witness fees, including Title VII, [14] and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. [15] Several federal laws permit recovery of expert witness fees, including Voting Rights Act of 1965, Consumer Product Safety Act, Toxic Substances Control Act, Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud Abuse and Prevention Act, Endangered Species Act, the Patent and Copyright Acts, PROTECT Act, Congressional Accountability Act of 1995, Presidential and Executive Office Accountability Act, and the Whistleblower Protections for Contractor Employees of Department of Defense, Coast Guard, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Act. [7]

Statement of Senator Harkin on introduction

When Senator Harkin introduced the bill, he explained the reasons for enactment. He said, “This critical legislation will remove the financial barrier that families, especially low- and middle-income families, face as they pursue their children's rights to the free, appropriate public education they deserve and are entitled to under the Fourteenth Amendment...There are . . .times when schools have not fulfilled their responsibilities to provide an appropriate education. In these cases, IDEA provides parents the right to challenge the schools through mediation and due process. To make their argument, families often need access to expert witnesses who can assess the student's needs and testify about whether the current IEP meets those needs. These expert witnesses are a resource that many families cannot afford, but without access to them, families may be unable to make their case. ” [16] A 2002 study found that more than 1/3 of children with disabilities lived in households with incomes of $25,000 or less, compared to 24% of the general population, and 2/3 of children with disabilities lived in families that earned less than $50,000 a year. [17]

Legislative history

CongressShort titleBill number(s)Date introducedSponsor(s)# of cosponsorsLatest status
110th Congress IDEA Fairness Restoration Act H.R. 4188 November 14, 2007 Chris Van Hollen

(D-MD)

42Died in committee
111th Congress H.R. 2740 June 4, 2009 Chris Van Hollen

(D-MD)

25Died in committee
112th Congress H.R. 1208 March 17, 2011 Chris Van Hollen

(D-MD)

18Died in committee
S. 613 March 17, 2011 Tom Harkin

(D-IA)

7Died in committee
113th Congress S. 2790 September 10, 2014 Tom Harkin

(D-IA)

1Died in committee

The IDEA Fairness Restoration Act was first introduced the House of Representatives in 2007 by Congressman Van Hollen and Congressman Sessions. [18] The bill was introduced again in 2009. [19] The bill was most recently re-introduced on March 17, 2011, in both the House and Senate as S.613 and H.R. 1208.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990</span> 1990 U.S. civil rights law

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 or ADA is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability. It affords similar protections against discrimination to Americans with disabilities as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which made discrimination based on race, religion, sex, national origin, and other characteristics illegal, and later sexual orientation and gender identity. In addition, unlike the Civil Rights Act, the ADA also requires covered employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities, and imposes accessibility requirements on public accommodations.

In English civil litigation, costs are the lawyers' fees and disbursements of the parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civil Rights Act of 1968</span> United States law

The Civil Rights Act of 1968 is a landmark law in the United States signed into law by United States President Lyndon B. Johnson during the King assassination riots.

Attorney's fee is a chiefly United States term for compensation for legal services performed by an attorney for a client, in or out of court.

The Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Award Act of 1976 is a law of the United States codified in 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b). It is often referred to as "Section 1988." It allows a Federal court to award reasonable attorney's fees to a prevailing party in certain civil rights cases. The Act was designed to create an enforcement mechanism for the nation's civil rights laws without creating an enforcement bureaucracy, because the prospect of being awarded attorneys' fees is thought to incentivize attorneys to bring civil rights cases on behalf of plaintiffs.

Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case about experts' fees in cases commenced under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that IDEA does not authorize the payment of the experts' fees of the prevailing parents. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg concurred in part, and in the judgment. Justices David Souter and Stephen Breyer filed dissents.

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court to determine and delineate several questions concerning administrative procedure in Social Security disability cases. Among the questions considered was the propriety of using physicians' written reports generated from medical examinations of a disability claimant, and whether these could constitute "substantial evidence" supportive of finding nondisability under the Social Security Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Syd Herlong</span> American politician

Albert Sydney Herlong Jr. was an American lawyer and politician from Florida who served ten terms in the United States House of Representatives from 1949 to 1969. He was a member of the Democratic Party.

The Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates (COPAA) is an independent national American association of parents of children with disabilities, attorneys, advocates, and related professionals who protect the legal and civil rights of students with disabilities and their families. COPAA has a 22-member Board of Directors who run the organization. Board members are selected to be representative of diversity of COPAA's peer-to-peer network and have significant experience in various aspects of COPAA's work. Currently COPAA has more than 3100 members in all states, the District of Columbia and several territories. Over 90% of all of its members, including professionals, are people with disabilities or parents and family members of people with disabilities. COPAA accomplishes its mission largely through the work of its network of volunteers, who are supported by the staff of the organization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyright Term Extension Act</span> United States copyright law

The Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act – also known as the Copyright Term Extension Act, Sonny Bono Act, or (derisively) the Mickey Mouse Protection Act – extended copyright terms in the United States in 1998. It is one of several acts extending the terms of copyright.

In the United States of America, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) authorizes the payment of attorney's fees to a prevailing party in an action against the United States absent a showing by the government that its position in the underlying litigation "was substantially justified". The Act is codified in scattered sections of the United States Code:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Credit CARD Act of 2009</span>

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009 is a federal statute passed by the United States Congress and signed by U.S. President Barack Obama on May 22, 2009. It is a comprehensive credit card reform legislation that aims "to establish fair and transparent practices relating to the extension of credit under an open end consumer credit plan, and for other purposes." The bill was passed with bipartisan support by both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

A private attorney general or public interest lawyer is an informal term originating in common law jurisdictions for a private attorney who brings a lawsuit claiming it to be in the public interest, i.e., benefiting the general public and not just the plaintiff, on behalf of a citizen or group of citizens. The attorney may, at the equitable discretion of the court, be entitled to recover attorney's fees if they prevail. The rationale behind this principle is to provide extra incentive to private attorneys to pursue suits that may be of benefit to society at large. Private attorney general suits are commonly, though not always, brought as class actions in jurisdictions that permit the certification of class action lawsuits.

The Keeping All Students Safe Act or KASSA is designed to protect children from the abuse of restraint and seclusion in school. The first Congressional bill was introduced in the United States House of Representatives on December 9, 2007, and named the Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act. The primary sponsors of the two bills are Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA), Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, Congressman George Miller (D-CA), Ranking Member of the House Education and Workforce Committee, and Congressman Gregg Harper (R-MS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act</span>

The National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2013 is a bill that was introduced into the United States House of Representatives during the 113th United States Congress. The bill would alter the rules and regulations surrounding getting permits/permission to undertake mining projects in the United States. The bill would also alter that legal framework associated with this type of mining.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Innovation Act</span>

The Innovation Act of the 113th Congress is a bill that would change the rules and regulations surrounding patent infringement lawsuits in an attempt to reduce patent lawsuits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open Book on Equal Access to Justice Act</span>

The Open Book on Equal Access to Justice Act is a bill that would require the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) to prepare a report each year on the amount of fees and other expenses awarded by federal courts to nonfederal entities when they prevail in a case against the United States. The bill would amend the Equal Access to Justice Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Innovation Act of the 114th Congress</span>

The Innovation Act of the 114th Congress is a bill that would change the rules and regulations surrounding patent infringement lawsuits in an attempt to reduce enforceability of patents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2015</span>

The Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2015 is an act of the United States that governs the activities of the United States Coast Guard (USCG) and the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC). The act also authorizes appropriations totaling about $17.5 billion, primarily for ongoing USCG operations over the 2016–2017 period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pregnant Workers Fairness Act</span> 2022 United States federal law

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act is a United States law meant to eliminate discrimination and ensure workplace accommodations for workers with known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition. It applies to employers having fifteen or more employees. Originally a stand-alone bill first introduced in 2012, the bill was included as Division II of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, which was passed by Congress on December 27, 2022, and signed by President Joe Biden on December 29, 2022. The bill went into force on June 27, 2023.

References

  1. ↑ HR4188, H.R. 4188 (U.S. House of Representatives, 110th Congress). Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  2. 1 2 3 S613 Archived 2016-11-14 at the Wayback Machine , S.613 (U.S. Senate, 112th Congress). Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  3. 1 2 HR1208 Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine , H.R. 1208 (U.S. House of Representatives, 112th Congress). Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  4. 1 2 Disability Scoop, Michelle Diament. “Congress to Consider Parent Financial Burden in IDEA Cases,” Disability Scoop, March 21, 2011. Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  5. ↑ Schaffer v Weast, Schaffer v. Weast, 546 U.S. 49 (2005) (Justice O’Connor, Opinion of the Court). Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  6. ↑ GAO 03-0897 Archived 2017-01-26 at the Wayback Machine , United States Government Accountability Office. “GAO Report 03-897,” September 2003. Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  7. 1 2 CRS Report 2008, Henry Cohen. “Awards of Attorneys' Fees by Federal Courts and Federal Agencies” (Congressional Research Service), June 20, 2008. Retrieved 18 April 2011
  8. ↑ 132 Congressional Record 16823-25 (1986).
  9. ↑ Murphy J. Souter Opinion Arlington Central School District v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006) (Justice Souter, Dissent) (quoting Handicapped Children’s Protection Act, Public Law 99-372, Section 4(b)(3), 100 Stat. 796, 797–98 (1986)). Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  10. ↑ Murphy Majority Opinion Arlington Central School District v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006) (Justice Alito, Opinion of the Court). Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  11. ↑ Analysis IDEA Fairness Act Archived 2017-08-18 at the Wayback Machine Autism National Committee. Analysis, IDEA Fairness Restoration Act. Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  12. ↑ 20 USC 1415 20 United States Code 1415(i)(3)(B).
  13. ↑ Cong Rec 2007, Congressman Chris Van Hollen. “Introduction of the IDEA Fairness Restoration Act,” Congressional Record, November 14, 2007. Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  14. ↑ Title VII 42 United States Code 2000e-5(k).
  15. ↑ ADA 42 United States Code 12205.
  16. ↑ Cong Rec 2011 Senator Tom Harkin, Congressional Record, March 17, 2011. Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  17. ↑ SEELS Report M. Wagner, C. Marder, J. Blackorby, & D. Cardoso. The Children We Serve: The Demographic Characteristics of Elementary and Middle School Students with Disabilities and Their Households (Sept. 2002). Retrieved 2 May 2011.
  18. ↑ 110hr4188/ HR4188, H.R. 4188 (U.S. House of Representatives, 110th Congress). Retrieved 18 April 2011.
  19. ↑ HR2740 Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine H.R. 2740 (U.S. House of Representatives, 111th Congress). Retrieved 18 April 2011.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.