Icelandic Constitutional Assembly election, 2010

Last updated
Iceland
Coat of arms of Iceland.svg
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Iceland
Constitution

Constitutional Assembly elections were held in Iceland on 27 November 2010. The Supreme Court of Iceland invalidated the results of the election on 25 January 2011 following complaints about several faults in how the election was conducted. [1] [2] However, it was decided on 25 February 2011 that the elected assembly members would instead be appointed to a Constitutional Council with effectively the same role. [3] The proposed changes to the constitution were approved in a referendum in October 2012.

Iceland island republic in Northern Europe

Iceland is a Nordic island country in the North Atlantic, with a population of 348,580 and an area of 103,000 km2 (40,000 sq mi), making it the most sparsely populated country in Europe. The capital and largest city is Reykjavík, with Reykjavík and the surrounding areas in the southwest of the country being home to over two-thirds of the population. Iceland is volcanically and geologically active. The interior consists of a plateau characterised by sand and lava fields, mountains, and glaciers, and many glacial rivers flow to the sea through the lowlands. Iceland is warmed by the Gulf Stream and has a temperate climate, despite a high latitude just outside the Arctic Circle. Its high latitude and marine influence keep summers chilly, with most of the archipelago having a tundra climate.

Supreme Court of Iceland final court of appeal in the judiciary of Iceland

The Supreme Court of Iceland is the final court of appeal in the judiciary of Iceland. It is also the oldest of the current courts of law in Iceland and the highest of the three Icelandic court branches, the others being the District Courts of Iceland and the Court of Appeal (Landsréttur).

Constitution of Iceland National democratic constitution

The Constitution of Iceland is the supreme law of Iceland. It is composed of 80 articles in seven sections, and within it the leadership arrangement of the country is determined and the human rights of its citizens are preserved. The current constitution was first instituted on June 17, 1944; since then, it has been amended seven times.

Contents

Background

This would be the first time in Iceland's history that a body had reviewed broad areas of the constitution. It was given the mandate to examine: [4]

  1. The foundations of the Icelandic constitution and its fundamental concepts;
  2. The organisation of the legislative and executive branches and the limits of their powers;
  3. The role and position of the President of the Republic;
  4. The independence of the judiciary and their supervision of other holders of governmental powers;
  5. Provisions on elections and electoral districts;
  6. Public participation in the democratic process, including the timing and organisation of a referendum, including a referendum on a legislative bill for a constitutional act;
  7. Transfer of sovereign powers to international organisations and the conduct of foreign affairs;
  8. Environmental matters, including the ownership and utilisation of natural resources.

The Constitutional Assembly was also empowered to address additional matters beyond “reviewing the Constitution of the Republic”.

The Assembly was required to convene by 15 February 2011 and finish its work no later than 15 April 2011. The 25 members were to be elected using the single transferable vote system under the Weighted Inclusive Gregory Method. Over 500 candidates filed to run in the election, more than double the most optimistic estimates. [5]

The single transferable vote (STV) is a voting system designed to achieve proportional representation through ranked voting in multi-seat organizations or constituencies. Under STV, an elector (voter) has a single vote that is initially allocated to their most preferred candidate. Votes are totalled and a quota derived. If their candidate achieves quota, he/she is elected and in some STV systems any surplus vote is transferred to other candidates in proportion to the voters' stated preferences. If more candidates than seats remain, the bottom candidate is eliminated with his/her votes being transferred to other candidates as determined by the voters' stated preferences. These elections and eliminations, and vote transfers if applicable, continue until there are only as many candidates as there are unfilled seats. The specific method of transferring votes varies in different systems.

Results

Turnout in the election was only 36%. 15 men and 10 women were elected, fulfilling the quota of 40% women required; had fewer women been elected, up to six women closest to being elected under the regular method would have been declared elected to fulfill the quota. [6] The full list of the 25 members elected to the Constitutional Assembly are as followed:

CandidateProfessionFirst preference votes
Þorvaldur Gylfason University Professor of Economics7,192
Salvör NordalDirector of the University of Iceland Ethics Institute2,842
Ómar Þorfinnur RagnarssonMedia Presenter2,440
Andrés MagnússonPhysician2,175
Pétur GunnlaugssonLawyer and Radio Presenter1,989
Þorkell HelgasonMathematician1,930
Ari TeitssonFarmer1,686
Illugi JökulssonJournalist1,593
Freyja Haraldsdóttir Manager1,089
Silja Bára ÓmarsdóttirLecturer in International Politics1,054
Örn Bárður JónssonPastor806
Eiríkur Bergmann EinarssonReader of Political Science753
Dögg HarðardóttirManager of the Division of Architecture at Reykjavik Art Museum 674
Vilhjálmur ÞorsteinssonChairman of CCP Games 672
Þórhildur ÞorleifsdóttirTheatre Director584
Pawel BartoszekMathematician584
Arnfríður GuðmundsdóttirUniversity Professor531
Erlingur SigurdarsonFormer Museum Director and Teacher526
Inga Lind KarlsdóttirMedia Presenter and University Student493
Katrín OddsdóttirLawyer479
Guðmundur Gunnarsson Trade Union Chairman432
Katrín FjelstedPhysician418
Ástrós GunnlaugsdóttirPolitical Scientist and University Student396
Gísli TryggvasonConsumer Spokesperson348
Lýður ÁrnasonFilmmaker and Physician347
Invalid/blank votes1,196
Total83,531
Registered voters232,374
Turnout35.9%
Source: Iceland Review

Aftermath

Election deemed null and void by the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of Iceland ruled the election to the Constitutional Assembly null and void with a decision on 25 January 2011. [7] Six Supreme Court Justices examined complaints about the election process. The Justices were: Garðar Gíslason, Árni Kolbeinsson, Gunnlaugur Claessen, Jón Steinar Gunnlaugsson, Páll Hreinsson and Viðar Már Matthíasson.

The court received complaints from Óðinn Sigþórsson, Skafti Harðarson and Þorgrímur S. Þorgrímsson. The complaints regarded various faults of the election process, according to the complainants. The court found five separate faults on the election process. It considered two of them to be serious.

  1. The fact that ballot papers had bar-codes printed in consecutive numerical order, was considered a serious fault of the election process and deemed an infringement of laws mandating a secret ballot, which the Court considered "a fundamental provision of the Icelandic Constitution concerning public elections". [8]
  2. The fact that cardboard dividers had been used in place of election booths, was thought in breach of Icelandic law requiring the use of closed booths for the electorate to cast their vote. The use of cardboard dividers was considered a fault of the election process, "the fact it was possible to glance a voter's ballot paper, which took some time to fill out if all options were exercised, is likely to restrict the right of the voter to exercise his vote freely if someone, whom he is dependent upon, could observe him or if the voter had reason to suspect that this could happen". [9]
  3. The fact that the legal requirement stipulating that ballot papers should be folded before being cast, was not followed. According to the Supreme Court, this rule was intended to "secure the right of the voter to cast his ballot in secret". [10] A majority of the Supreme Court considered this a fault of the election process. Supreme Court Justices Garðar Gíslason and Viðar Már Matthíasson were of a different opinion in regards to this, and did not consider the process unlawful.
  4. The ballot boxes did not comply with Icelandic law, since it was not possible to secure them with a lock. Furthermore, the Supreme Court considered the ballot boxes "of a make so that it was possible without much effort to disassemble them and access ballot papers. The make and quality of the ballot boxes was thus conductive to reduce the security and secrecy of the election". [11] This was considered a fault of the election process.
  5. The legislation concerning elections mandated that the National Electoral Commission had to draft persons to observe the electoral process. The Supreme Court stated that since there had been doubt as to how to interpret 13-15% of the votes during the election, such observers had been of special importance to guard the rights of the candidates. The Supreme Court considered this a serious fault of the election process. [12]

The Supreme Court referred to the fact that it was the role of the legislature to establish clear and unambiguous rules for the conduct of public elections which take into account the circumstances resulting from their special nature. It was however not lawful for the government to deviate from the clear provisions of the laws concerning elections, because of the number of candidates or because of new procedures thought suitable for electronic tallying of votes.

The Court further pointed to case law supporting its decision. The Court referred to the fact that in Icelandic jurisprudence there was precedent for declaring elections null and void when the election process was in breach of law and suited to violate election secrecy. For example, elections in Helgafellssveit regarding the unification of municipalities had been declared null and void. That judgement was reached because the ballot paper was of such a make that it was possible to see writing though it, even though it was folded. In its reasoning in that case the Supreme Court said:

The ballot paper does thus not ensure, that the election is secret in accordance to Article 17 of Act no. 8/1986, which is among fundamental provisions in Icelandic law concerning public elections, pursuant to Article 87. and Article 91. of Act no. 80/1987 and Article 31. of the Icelandic Constitution. A fault in this regard is by its very nature conductive to influence the outcome of elections [13]

Another precedent from jurisprudence where elections have been declared null and void because of faults in election secrecy is the election to a Municipal Commission in Geithellnahreppur the 25th of June 1978. Like the precedent the Supreme Court referred to in its decision on the Constitutional Assembly, the ballot papers were of such a make that it was possible to see writing through them when folded. The Supreme Court stated:

We concur with the District Court decision, that the ballot paper was not of the make that is prescribed by law in Article 50. of Act no. 52/1959, pursuant to Article 1. of Act no. 5/1962, pursuant to Article 1. of Act no. 5/1966 and the principal rule of Article 7., 2. para, of Act no. 5/1962, and does not ensure, that the elections are secret. The provisions of Article 15., 1. para., of Act no. 58/1961, which stipulates, that these elections should be secret, is certainly among the fundamental provisions in Icelandic law concerning public elections. [14]

According to Þorvaldur Gylfason (the most popular candidate in the election) this was 'a bizarre technical complaint about the way the election to the constituent assembly had been conducted'.

After receiving their election certificate (kjörbréf) on December 2, 2010, [15] the elected delegates were informed on January 27, 2011, that the election certificates had been revoked by the National Election Commission. [16] The following day, all of the Commission members tendered their resignation citing the circumstances that had arisen and the harmony necessary for the Commission to carry out its functions. [17]

Parliament appoints the candidates

Parliament began the same day to deliberate whether and how to continue the process. It was decided on 25 February 2011 that the elected assembly members would be appointed by Parliament to a Constitutional Council with basically the same role. A resolution passed which appointed most of the delegates that had been elected. The Parliament voted thus:

VoteCountPercentage
Yes3047.6%
No2133.3%
Abstained711.1%
Not present58%
Source:

All members of Parliament for the Independence Party were against this solution. [18] Six of the seven abstainees were members of the governing coalition. [19]

Proposed constitutional amendments changes

The changes proposed by the Assembly included:

The constitution draft was finished on 29 July 2011 and presented to the Althing on the same day. [23]

Referendum

The proposed changes were approved in a referendum on 20 October 2012.

Related Research Articles

Constitution of the Irish Free State

The Constitution of the Irish Free State was adopted by Act of Dáil Éireann sitting as a constituent assembly on 25 October 1922. In accordance with Article 83 of the Constitution, the Irish Free State Constitution Act 1922 of the British Parliament, which came into effect upon receiving the royal assent on 5 December 1922, provided that the Constitution would come into effect upon the issue of a Royal Proclamation, which was done on 6 December 1922. In 1937 the Constitution of the Irish Free State was replaced by the modern Constitution of Ireland following a referendum.

A constitutional amendment is a modification of the constitution of a polity, organization or other type of entity. Amendments are often interwoven into the relevant sections of an existing constitution, directly altering the text. Conversely, they can be appended to the constitution as supplemental additions (codicils), thus changing the frame of government without altering the existing text of the document.

A constituent assembly or constitutional assembly is a body or assembly of popularly elected representatives composed for the purpose of drafting or adopting a constitutional-type document. The constituent assembly is a subset of a constitutional convention elected entirely by popular vote; that is, all constituent assemblies are constitutional conventions, but a constitutional convention is not necessarily a constituent assembly. As the fundamental document constituting a state, a constitution cannot normally be modified or amended by the state's normal legislative procedures; instead a constitutional convention or a constituent assembly, the rules for which are normally laid down in the constitution, must be set up. A constituent assembly is usually set up for its specific purpose, which it carries out in a relatively short time, after which the assembly is dissolved. A constituent assembly is a form of representative democracy.

President of Egypt The President of the Arab Republic of Egypt is the head of state of Egypt.

The President of the Arab Republic of Egypt is the head of state of Egypt. Under the various iterations of the Constitution of Egypt, the president is also the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces and head of the executive branch of the Egyptian government. The current president is Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, in office since 8 June 2014.

Election law is a discipline falling at the juncture of constitutional law and political science. It researches "the politics of law and the law of politics". The conceptual knowledge behind election law focuses on who votes, when that person can vote, and the construction behind the tabulated totals.

Constitutional Council (France) National constitutional ruling body of France

The Constitutional Council is the highest constitutional authority in France. It was established by the Constitution of the Fifth Republic on 4 October 1958 and its duty is to ensure that constitutional principles and rules are upheld. It is housed in the Palais-Royal, Paris.

The Constitution of the State of Tennessee defines the form, structure, activities, character, and fundamental rules of the U.S. State of Tennessee.

Colombian Constitution of 1991 constitution

The Constitution of Colombia, better known as the Constitution of 1991, is the current governing document of the Republic of Colombia. Promulgated on July 4, 1991, it replaced the Constitution of 1886. It is Colombia's ninth constitution since 1830. See a timeline of all previous constitutions and amendments here. It has recently been called the Constitution of Rights.

The Constitutional Act of the Kingdom of Denmark, or simply the Constitution, is the constitution of the Kingdom of Denmark, applying equally in Denmark proper, Greenland and the Faroe Islands. In its present form, the Constitutional Act is from 1953, but the principal features of the Act go back to 1849, making it one of the oldest constitutions.

The Constitution of the State of Arkansas is the governing document of the U.S. state of Arkansas. It was adopted in 1874, shortly after the Brooks-Baxter War. It replaced the 1868 constitution adopted by the legislature following the end of the American Civil War and under which Arkansas rejoined the Union.

Constitution of Belarus

The Constitution of the Republic of Belarus is the ultimate law of Belarus. Adopted in 1994, three years after the country declared its independence from the Soviet Union, this formal document establishes the framework of the Belarusian state and government and enumerates the rights and freedoms of its citizens. The Constitution was drafted by the Supreme Soviet of Belarus, the former legislative body of the country, and was improved upon by citizens and legal experts. The contents of the Constitution include the preamble, nine sections, and 146 articles.

President of Montenegro position

The President of Montenegro is the head of state of Montenegro. The current president is Milo Đukanović, who was elected in the first round of the 2018 presidential election with 53.90% of the vote. The official residence of the President is the Blue Palace located in the former royal capital Cetinje.

Term limits legislation – term limits for state and federal office-holders – has been a recurring political issue in the U.S. state of Oregon since 1992. In that year's general election, Oregon voters approved Ballot Measure 3, an initiative that enacted term limits for representatives in both houses of the United States Congress and the Oregon Legislative Assembly, and statewide officeholders. It has been described as the strictest term limits law in the country.

1911 California Proposition 7

Proposition 7 of 1911 was an amendment of the Constitution of California that introduced, for the first time, the initiative and the optional referendum. Prior to 1911 the only form of direct democracy in California was the compulsory referendum.

2011 Egyptian constitutional referendum

A constitutional referendum was held in Egypt on 19 March 2011, following the 2011 Egyptian revolution. More than 14 million (77%) were in favour, while around 4 million (23%) opposed the changes; 41% of 45 million eligible voters turned out to vote.

2010–13 Icelandic constitutional reform

An Icelandic Constitutional Council (Stjórnlagaráð) for the purpose of reviewing the Constitution of the Republic was appointed by a resolution of Althingi, the Icelandic parliament, on 24 March 2011. Elections were held to create a Constitutional Assembly (Stjórnlagaþing) body, but given some electoral flaws, had been ruled null and void by the Supreme Court of Iceland on 25 January 2011, leading the parliament to place most of the wining candidate into a Council with similar mission. The question of whether the text of the proposed constitution should form a base for a future constitution was put to a non-binding referendum, where it won the approval of 67% of voters. However, the government's term finished before the reform bill could be passed, and the next government has not acted upon it.

Basic Laws of Israel

The Basic Laws of Israel are the constitutional laws of the State of Israel, and can only be changed by a supermajority vote in the Knesset. Many of these laws are based on the individual liberties that were outlined in the Israeli Declaration of Independence. The Basic Laws deal with the formation and role of the principal institutions of the state, and with the relations between the state's authorities. They also protect the country's civil rights, although some of these rights were earlier protected at common law by the Supreme Court of Israel. The Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty enjoys super-legal status, giving the Supreme Court the authority to disqualify any law contradicting it, as well as protection from Emergency Regulations.

Marsy's Law for Illinois, formally called the Illinois Crime Victims' Bill of Rights, amended the 1993 Rights of Crime Victims and Witnesses Act by establishing additional protections for crime victims and their families. Voters approved the measure as a constitutional amendment on November 4, 2014. It became law in 2015.

References

  1. ↑ Iceland’s Constitutional Assembly Voting Invalid Iceland Review, 25 January 2011
  2. ↑ News Review: The Supreme Court’s Verdict Iceland Review, 26 January 2011
  3. ↑ Constitutional Assembly Elects Appointed to Council Iceland Review, 25 February 2011
  4. ↑ http://politicalreform.ie/2010/10/22/election-of-a-constitutional-assembly-in-iceland-2010/
  5. ↑ http://www.icelandreview.com/icelandreview/daily_news/?cat_id=16568&ew_0_a_id=369131
  6. ↑ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/silja-b/you-say-you-want-a-consti_b_790359.html
  7. ↑ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-01-22. Retrieved 2015-08-29.
  8. ↑ Part VI.1 of the decision of the Supreme Court of Iceland 25th of January 2011
  9. ↑ Part VI.2 of the decision of the Supreme Court of Iceland 25th of January 2011
  10. ↑ Part VI.3 of the decision of the Supreme Court of Iceland 25th of January 2011
  11. ↑ Part VI.4 of the decision of the Supreme Court of Iceland 25th of January 2011
  12. ↑ Part VI.5 of the decision of the Supreme Court of Iceland 25th of January 2011
  13. ↑ Decision of the Icelandic Supreme Court 8th of December 1994 in case no. 425/1994
  14. ↑ Judgement of the Supreme Court of Iceland 9th of February 1982 in case no. 96/1980
  15. ↑ "Assembly delegates received their election papers" (in Icelandic). National Broadcasting Service, December 2, 2010.
  16. ↑ "Election papers considered invalid" (in Icelandic). Morgunbladid, January 27, 2011.
  17. ↑ "National Election Commission resigns" (in Icelandic). Visir, January 28, 2011.
  18. ↑ http://www.icelandreview.com/icelandreview/daily_news/Constitutional_Assembly_Elects_Appointed_to_Council_0_374415.news.aspx
  19. ↑ http://www.althingi.is/thingstorf/thingmalin/atkvaedagreidsla/?nnafnak=44294
  20. ↑ http://www.icelandreview.com/icelandreview/search/news/Default.asp?ew_0_a_id=378828
  21. ↑ http://www.icelandreview.com/icelandreview/search/news/Default.asp?ew_0_a_id=378519
  22. ↑ http://www.icenews.is/index.php/2011/07/19/icelands-constitutional-council-presents-draft-documents/
  23. ↑ http://stjornlagarad.is/
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.