In silico clinical trials

Last updated

An in silico clinical trial, also known as a virtual clinical trial, is an individualized computer simulation used in the development or regulatory evaluation of a medicinal product, device, or intervention. While completely simulated clinical trials are not feasible with current technology and understanding of biology, its development would be expected to have major benefits over current in vivo clinical trials, and research on it is being pursued.

Contents

History

The term in silico indicates any use of computers in clinical trials, even if limited to management of clinical information in a database. [1]

Rationale

The traditional model for the development of medical treatments and devices begins with pre-clinical development. In laboratories, test-tube and other in vitro experiments establish the plausibility for the efficacy of the treatment. Then in vivo animal models, with different species, provide guidance on the efficacy and safety of the product for humans. With success in both in vitro and in vivo studies, scientist can propose that clinical trials test whether the product be made available for humans. Clinical trials are often divided into four phases. Phase 3 involves testing a large number of people. [2] When a medication fails at this stage, the financial losses can be catastrophic. [3]

Predicting low-frequency side effects has been difficult, because such side effects need not become apparent until the treatment is adopted by many patients. The appearance of severe side-effects in phase three often causes development to stop, for ethical and economic reasons. [2] [4] [5] Also, in recent years many candidate drugs failed in phase 3 trials because of lack of efficacy rather than for safety reasons. [2] [3] One reason for failure is that traditional trials aim to establish efficacy and safety for most subjects, rather than for individual subjects, and so efficacy is determined by a statistic of central tendency for the trial. Traditional trials do not adapt the treatment to the covariates of subjects:

Aim

Accurate computer models of a treatment and its deployment, as well as patient characteristics, are necessary precursors for the development of in silico clinical trials. [5] [6] [8] [9] In such a scenario, ‘virtual’ patients would be given a ‘virtual’ treatment, enabling observation through a computer simulation of how the candidate biomedical product performs and whether it produces the intended effect, without inducing adverse effects. Such in silico clinical trials could help to reduce, refine, and partially replace real clinical trials by:

In addition, real clinical trials may indicate that a product is unsafe or ineffective, but rarely indicate why or suggest how it might be improved. As such, a product that fails during clinical trials may simply be abandoned, even if a small modification would solve the problem. This stifles innovation, decreasing the number of truly original biomedical products presented to the market every year, and at the same time increasing the cost of development. [12] Analysis through in silico clinical trials is expected to provide a better understanding of the mechanism that caused the product to fail in testing, [8] [13] and may be able to provide information that could be used to refine the product to such a degree that it could successfully complete clinical trials.

In silico clinical trials would also provide significant benefits over current pre-clinical practices. Unlike animal models, the virtual human models can be re-used indefinitely, providing significant cost savings. Compared to trials in animals or a small sample of humans, in silico trials might more effectively predict the behaviour of the drug or device in large-scale trials, identifying side effects that were previously difficult or impossible to detect, helping to prevent unsuitable candidates from progressing to the costly phase 3 trials. [12]

In radiology

One relatively well-developed field of in-silico clinical trials is radiology, where the entire imaging process is digitized. [14] [15] The development has accelerated in recent years following the growth of computer capacity and more advanced simulation models, and is now at the point that virtual platforms are gaining acceptance by regulatory bodies as a complement to conventional clinical trials for new product introductions. [16]

A complete framework for in-silico clinical trials in radiology needs to include the following three components: 1) A realistic patient population, which is computer simulated using software phantoms; 2) The simulated response of the imaging system; 3) Image evaluation in a systematic way by human or model observers. [14] [15]

Computational phantoms for imaging in-silico trials require a high degree of realism because images will be produced and evaluated. To date, the most realistic whole-body phantoms are so-called boundary representation (BREP) phantoms, which are surface representations of segmented 3D patient data (MRI or CT). [17] The fitted surfaces allow for modelling anatomical changes or motion in addition to realistic anatomy. Existing models for generating intra-organ structures are based on mathematical modelling, patient images, or generative adversarial network (GAN) modelling of patient images. [16] [18] Models of pathologies are important for simulating clinical applications targeted on specific diseases. State-of-the-art models are based on segmented lesions with enhancements for structures above the resolution limit of the imaging system using digital pathology or physiological growth models. [19] GAN models have been used to simulate disease as well. [20] In addition to the above, models have been developed for organ and patient motion, blood flow and contrast agent perfusion.

The response of the imaging system is generally simulated with Monte-Carlo or raytracing system models, benchmarked to measurements on physical phantoms. [21] [22] Medical imaging has a long history of system simulation for technology development and proprietary as well as public-domain models exist for a wide range of imaging systems.

The final step of an imaging in-silico trial is evaluation and interpretation of the generated images in a systematic way. The images can be evaluated by humans in ways similar to a conventional clinical trial, but for an in-silico trial to be really effective, image interpretation as well needs to be automized. For detection and quantification tasks, so-called observer models have been thoroughly studied and validated against human observers, and a range of spatial-domain models exist in the literature. [23] Image interpretation based on deep learning and artificial intelligence (AI) is an active research field, [24] and might become a valuable aid for the radiologist to find abnormalities or to make decisions. Applying AI observers in in-silico trials is relatively straightforward as the entire image chain is digitized.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simulation</span> Imitation of the operation of a real-world process or system over time

A simulation is an imitative representation of a process or system that could exist in the real world. In this broad sense, simulation can often be used interchangeably with model. Sometimes a clear distinction between the two terms is made, in which simulations require the use of models; the model represents the key characteristics or behaviors of the selected system or process, whereas the simulation represents the evolution of the model over time. Another way to distinguish between the terms is to define simulation as experimentation with the help of a model. This definition includes time-independent simulations. Often, computers are used to execute the simulation.

<i>In silico</i> Latin phrase referring to computer simulations

In biology and other experimental sciences, an in silico experiment is one performed on a computer or via computer simulation software. The phrase is pseudo-Latin for 'in silicon', referring to silicon in computer chips. It was coined in 1987 as an allusion to the Latin phrases in vivo, in vitro, and in situ, which are commonly used in biology. The latter phrases refer, respectively, to experiments done in living organisms, outside living organisms, and where they are found in nature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Preclinical development</span> Stage of drug development

In drug development, preclinical development is a stage of research that begins before clinical trials and during which important feasibility, iterative testing and drug safety data are collected, typically in laboratory animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drug development</span> Process of bringing a new pharmaceutical drug to the market

Drug development is the process of bringing a new pharmaceutical drug to the market once a lead compound has been identified through the process of drug discovery. It includes preclinical research on microorganisms and animals, filing for regulatory status, such as via the United States Food and Drug Administration for an investigational new drug to initiate clinical trials on humans, and may include the step of obtaining regulatory approval with a new drug application to market the drug. The entire process—from concept through preclinical testing in the laboratory to clinical trial development, including Phase I–III trials—to approved vaccine or drug typically takes more than a decade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agomelatine</span> Atypical antidepressant classified primarily as a melatonin receptor agonist

Agomelatine, sold under the brand names Valdoxan and Thymanax, among others, is an atypical antidepressant most commonly used to treat major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. One review found that it is as effective as other antidepressants with similar discontinuation rates overall but fewer discontinuations due to side effects. Another review also found it was similarly effective to many other antidepressants.

The term virtual patient is used to describe interactive computer simulations used in health care education to train students on clinical processes such as making diagnoses and therapeutic decisions. Virtual patients attempt to combine modern technologies and game-based learning to facilitate education, and complement real clinical training. Using virtual patients is increasing in healthcare due to increased demands on healthcare professionals, education of healthcare trainees, and providing learners with a safe practice environment. There are many formats from which a virtual patient may be chosen, but the overarching principle is that of interactivity. Virtual patients typically have mechanisms where information is parsed out in response to the learners, simulating how patients respond to different treatments. Interactivity can be created with questions, specific decision-making tasks, text composition, etc., and is non-sequential. Most systems provide quantitative and qualitative feedback. In some cases, virtual patients are not full simulations themselves, but are mainly based on paper-based cases; as they do not allow for physical examination or an in-depth medical history of an actual patient. There are certain drawbacks as crucial clinical findings may be missed due to the lack of examining patients in person.

The Virtual Physiological Human (VPH) is a European initiative that focuses on a methodological and technological framework that, once established, will enable collaborative investigation of the human body as a single complex system. The collective framework will make it possible to share resources and observations formed by institutions and organizations, creating disparate but integrated computer models of the mechanical, physical and biochemical functions of a living human body.

Pharmacometrics is a field of study of the methodology and application of models for disease and pharmacological measurement. It uses mathematical models of biology, pharmacology, disease, and physiology to describe and quantify interactions between xenobiotics and patients, including beneficial effects and adverse effects. It is normally applied to quantify drug, disease and trial information to aid efficient drug development, regulatory decisions and rational drug treatment in patients.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Enobosarm</span> Investigational selective androgen receptor modulator

Enobosarm, also formerly known as ostarine and by the developmental code names GTx-024, MK-2866, and S-22, is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which is under development for the treatment of androgen receptor-positive breast cancer in women and for improvement of body composition in people taking GLP-1 receptor agonists like semaglutide. It was also under development for a variety of other indications, including treatment of cachexia, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, muscle atrophy or sarcopenia, and stress urinary incontinence, but development for all other uses has been discontinued. Enobosarm was evaluated for the treatment of muscle wasting related to cancer in late-stage clinical trials, and the drug improved lean body mass in these trials, but it was not effective in improving muscle strength. As a result, enobosarm was not approved and development for this use was terminated. Enobosarm is taken by mouth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Befiradol</span> Chemical compound

Befiradol is an experimental drug being studied for the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia. It is a potent and selective 5-HT1A receptor full agonist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pomaglumetad</span> Drug, used as a treatment for schizophrenia

Pomaglumetad (LY-404,039) is an amino acid analog drug that acts as a highly selective agonist for the metabotropic glutamate receptor group II subtypes mGluR2 and mGluR3. Pharmacological research has focused on its potential antipsychotic and anxiolytic effects. Pomaglumetad is intended as a treatment for schizophrenia and other psychotic and anxiety disorders by modulating glutamatergic activity and reducing presynaptic release of glutamate at synapses in limbic and forebrain areas relevant to these disorders. Human studies investigating therapeutic use of pomaglumetad have focused on the prodrug LY-2140023, a methionine amide of pomaglumetad (also called pomaglumetad methionil) since pomaglumetad exhibits low oral absorption and bioavailability in humans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecopipam</span> Investigational dopamine antagonist

Ecopipam is a dopamine antagonist which is under development for the treatment of Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, Tourette's syndrome, speech disorders, and restless legs syndrome. It is taken by mouth.

Biosimulation is a computer-aided mathematical simulation of biological processes and systems and thus is an integral part of systems biology. Due to the complexity of biological systems simplified models are often used, which should only be as complex as necessary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phases of clinical research</span> Clinical trial stages using human subjects

The phases of clinical research are the stages in which scientists conduct experiments with a health intervention to obtain sufficient evidence for a process considered effective as a medical treatment. For drug development, the clinical phases start with testing for drug safety in a few human subjects, then expand to many study participants to determine if the treatment is effective. Clinical research is conducted on drug candidates, vaccine candidates, new medical devices, and new diagnostic assays.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brexpiprazole</span> Atypical antipsychotic

Brexpiprazole, sold under the brand name Rexulti among others, is a medication used for the treatment of major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and agitation associated with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. It is an atypical antipsychotic.

In silico medicine is the application of in silico research to problems involving health and medicine. It is the direct use of computer simulation in the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of a disease. More specifically, in silico medicine is characterized by modeling, simulation, and visualization of biological and medical processes in computers with the goal of simulating real biological processes in a virtual environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brincidofovir</span> Antiviral drug

Brincidofovir, sold under the brand name Tembexa, is an antiviral drug used to treat smallpox. Brincidofovir is a prodrug of cidofovir. Conjugated to a lipid, the compound is designed to release cidofovir intracellularly, allowing for higher intracellular and lower plasma concentrations of cidofovir, effectively increasing its activity against dsDNA viruses, as well as oral bioavailability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vosilasarm</span> Chemical compound

Vosilasarm, also known by the development codes RAD140 and EP0062 and by the black-market name Testolone or Testalone, is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which is under development for the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer. It is specifically under development for the treatment of androgen receptor-positive, estrogen receptor-negative, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Vosilasarm was also previously under development for the treatment of sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and weight loss due to cancer cachexia, but development for these indications was discontinued. The drug is taken by mouth.

A cerebroprotectant is a drug that is intended to protect the brain after the onset of acute ischemic stroke. As stroke is the second largest cause of death worldwide and a leading cause of adult disability, over 150 drugs tested in clinical trials to provide cerebroprotection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pharmacological cardiotoxicity</span>

Pharmacological cardiotoxicity is a cardiac damage under the action of drugs and it can occur both affecting the performances of the cardiac muscle and by altering the ion channels/currents of the functional cardiac cells, named the cardiomyocytes.

References

Creative Commons by small.svg  This article incorporates text available under the CC BY 4.0 license.

  1. This sense of the term was used in 2011 in a position paper from the VPH Institute commenting on the green paper written ahead of the launch of the European Commission Horizon 2020 framework programme. VPH greenpaper
  2. 1 2 3 Arrowsmith J, Miller P (August 2013). "Trial watch: phase II and phase III attrition rates 2011-2012". Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery. 12 (8): 569. doi: 10.1038/nrd4090 . PMID   23903212.
  3. 1 2 Milligan PA, Brown MJ, Marchant B, Martin SW, van der Graaf PH, Benson N, et al. (June 2013). "Model-based drug development: a rational approach to efficiently accelerate drug development". Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 93 (6): 502–514. doi:10.1038/clpt.2013.54. PMID   23588322. S2CID   29806156.
  4. 1 2 Harnisch L, Shepard T, Pons G, Della Pasqua O (February 2013). "Modeling and simulation as a tool to bridge efficacy and safety data in special populations". CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology. 2 (2): e28. doi:10.1038/psp.2013.6. PMC   3600759 . PMID   23835939.
  5. 1 2 3 Davies MR, Mistry HB, Hussein L, Pollard CE, Valentin JP, Swinton J, Abi-Gerges N (April 2012). "An in silico canine cardiac midmyocardial action potential duration model as a tool for early drug safety assessment". American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 302 (7): H1466–H1480. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00808.2011. PMID   22198175.
  6. 1 2 3 Hunter P, Chapman T, Coveney PV, de Bono B, Diaz V, Fenner J, et al. (April 2013). "A vision and strategy for the virtual physiological human: 2012 update". Interface Focus. 3 (2): 20130004. doi:10.1098/rsfs.2013.0004. PMC   3638492 . PMID   24427536.
  7. Viceconti M, Affatato S, Baleani M, Bordini B, Cristofolini L, Taddei F (January 2009). "Pre-clinical validation of joint prostheses: a systematic approach". Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2 (1): 120–127. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.02.005. PMID   19627814.
  8. 1 2 3 Erdman AG, Keefe DF, Schiestl R (March 2013). "Grand challenge: applying regulatory science and big data to improve medical device innovation". IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering. 60 (3): 700–706. doi:10.1109/TBME.2013.2244600. PMID   23380845. S2CID   442791.
  9. 1 2 Clermont G, Bartels J, Kumar R, Constantine G, Vodovotz Y, Chow C (October 2004). "In silico design of clinical trials: a method coming of age". Critical Care Medicine. 32 (10): 2061–2070. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000142394.28791.C3. PMID   15483415. S2CID   10952248.
  10. Agarwal Y (2019-02-15). "New Technological Breakthroughs for Patient-Specific Healthcare and Schizophrenia". ETHealthworld.com. Retrieved 2019-04-01.
  11. Kovatchev BP, Breton M, Man CD, Cobelli C (January 2009). "In silico preclinical trials: a proof of concept in closed-loop control of type 1 diabetes". Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 3 (1): 44–55. doi:10.1177/193229680900300106. PMC   2681269 . PMID   19444330.
  12. 1 2 Viceconti M, Morley-Fletcher E, Henney A, Contin M, El-Arifi K, McGregor C, Karlstrom A, Wilkinson E. "In Silico Clinical Trials: How Computer Simulation Will Transform The Biomedical Industry An international research and development roadmap for an industry-driven initiative" (PDF). Avicenna-ISCT. Avicenna Project. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
  13. Manolis E, Rohou S, Hemmings R, Salmonson T, Karlsson M, Milligan PA (February 2013). "The Role of Modeling and Simulation in Development and Registration of Medicinal Products: Output From the EFPIA/EMA Modeling and Simulation Workshop". CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology. 2 (2): e31. doi:10.1038/psp.2013.7. PMC   3600760 . PMID   23835942.
  14. 1 2 Abadi E, Segars WP, Tsui BM, Kinahan PE, Bottenus N, Frangi AF, et al. (July 2020). "Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review". Journal of Medical Imaging. 7 (4): 042805. doi:10.1117/1.JMI.7.4.042805. PMC   7148435 . PMID   32313817.
  15. 1 2 Maidment DA (2014). "Virtual Clinical Trials for the Assessment of Novel Breast Screening Modalities". In Fujita H, Hiroshi H, Takeshi M, Muramatsu C (eds.). Breast Imaging. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8539. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–8. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_1. ISBN   978-3-319-07886-1.
  16. 1 2 Glick SJ, Ikejimba LC (October 2018). "Advances in digital and physical anthropomorphic breast phantoms for x-ray imaging". Medical Physics. 45 (10): e870–e885. Bibcode:2018MedPh..45E.870G. doi: 10.1002/mp.13110 . PMID   30058117. S2CID   51865533.
  17. Segars WP, Sturgeon G, Mendonca S, Grimes J, Tsui BM (September 2010). "4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research". Medical Physics. 37 (9): 4902–4915. Bibcode:2010MedPh..37.4902S. doi:10.1118/1.3480985. PMC   2941518 . PMID   20964209.
  18. Chang Y, Lafata K, Segars WP, Yin FF, Ren L (March 2020). "Development of realistic multi-contrast textured XCAT (MT-XCAT) phantoms using a dual-discriminator conditional-generative adversarial network (D-CGAN)". Physics in Medicine and Biology. 65 (6): 065009. Bibcode:2020PMB....65f5009C. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab7309. PMC   7252912 . PMID   32023555.
  19. Sauer TJ, Samei E (2019-03-14). "Modeling dynamic, nutrient-access-based lesion progression using stochastic processes". In Bosmans H, Chen GH, Gilat Schmidt T (eds.). Medical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical Imaging. Vol. 10948. SPIE. pp. 1193–1200. Bibcode:2019SPIE10948E..50S. doi:10.1117/12.2513201. ISBN   9781510625433. S2CID   92553165.
  20. Sauer TJ, Richards TW, Buckler AJ, Daubert M, Douglas P, Segars WP, Samei E (2020-03-16). Bosmans H, Chen JH (eds.). "Synthesis of physiologically-informed computational coronary artery plaques for use in virtual clinical trials (Conference Presentation)". Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging. 11312. SPIE: 113121X. doi:10.1117/12.2550011. ISBN   9781510633919. S2CID   216439674.
  21. Badal A, Badano A (October 2009). "Monte Carlo simulation of X-ray imaging using a graphics processing unit". 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC). pp. 4081–4084. doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.2009.5402382. ISBN   978-1-4244-3961-4. S2CID   9960455.
  22. di Franco F, Sarno A, Mettivier G, Hernandez AM, Bliznakova K, Boone JM, Russo P (June 2020). "GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations for virtual clinical trials in breast X-ray imaging: Proof of concept". Physica Medica. 74: 133–142. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.05.007. PMID   32470909. S2CID   219105424.
  23. Abbey CK, Barrett HH (March 2001). "Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability". Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 18 (3): 473–488. Bibcode:2001JOSAA..18..473A. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.18.000473. PMC   2943344 . PMID   11265678.
  24. Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I (April 2019). "Machine Learning in Medicine". The New England Journal of Medicine. 380 (14): 1347–1358. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1814259. PMID   30943338. S2CID   92996321.