Indentation plastometry

Last updated

Indentation plastometry is the idea of using an indentation-based procedure to obtain (bulk) mechanical properties (of metals) in the form of stress-strain relationships in the plastic regime (as opposed to hardness testing, which gives numbers that are only semi-quantitative indicators of the resistance to plastic deformation). Since indentation is a much easier and more convenient procedure than conventional tensile testing, with far greater potential for mapping of spatial variations, this is an attractive concept (provided that the outcome is at least approximately as reliable as those of standard uniaxial tests).

Contents

Basic requirements

Capturing of macroscopic (size-independent) properties brings in a requirement [1] [2] [3] [4] to deform a volume of material that is large enough to be representative of the bulk. This depends on the microstructure, but usually means that it must contain “many” grains and is typically of the order of hundreds of microns in linear dimensions. The indentation size effect, in which the measured hardness tends to increase as the deformed volume becomes small, is at least partly due to a failure to interrogate a representative volume. The indenter, which is normally spherical, therefore needs to have a radius in the approximate range of several hundred microns up to a mm or two.

A further requirement concerns the plastic strains generated in the sample. The indentation response must be sensitive to the plasticity characteristics of the material over the strain range of interest, which normally extends up to at least several % and commonly up to several tens of %. The strains created in the sample must therefore also range up to values of this order. This typically requires that the “penetration ratio” (penetration depth over indenter radius) should be at least about 10%. Finally, depending on the hardness of the metal, this in turn requires that the facility should have a relatively high load capability – usually of the order of several kN.

Experimental outcomes

The simplest indentation procedures, which have been in use for many decades, involve the application of a pre-determined load (often from a dead weight), followed by measurement of the lateral size of the residual indent (or possibly its depth). However, many indentation procedures are now based on “instrumented” set-ups, in which the load is progressively ramped up and both load and penetration (displacement) are continuously monitored during indentation. A key experimental outcome is thus the load-displacement curve. Various types of equipment can be used to generate such curves. These include those designed to carry out so-called “nanoindentation” - for which both the load (down to the mN range) and the displacement (commonly sub-micron) are very small. However, as noted above, if the deformed volume is small, then it’s not possible to obtain “bulk” properties. Moreover, even with relatively large loads and displacements, some kind of “compliance correction” may be required, to separate the response of the sample from displacements associated with the loading system.

The other main form of experimental outcome is the shape of the residual indent. As mentioned above, early types of hardness tester focused on this, in the form of (relatively crude) measurement of the “width” of the indent – commonly via simple optical microscopy. However, much richer information can be extracted by using a profilometer (optical or stylus) to obtain the full shape of the residual indent. With a spherical indenter (and a sample that is isotropic in the plane of the indented surface), the indent will exhibit radial symmetry and its shape can be captured in the form of a single profile (of depth against radial position). The details of this shape (for a given applied load) exhibit a high sensitivity to the stress-strain relationship of the sample. [5] [6] [7] Also, it is easier to obtain than a load-displacement curve, partly because no measurements need to be made during loading. Finally, such profilometry has potential for the detection and characterization [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] of sample anisotropy (whereas load-displacement curves carry no such information).

Solution procedures

Two main approaches have evolved for obtaining stress-strain relationships from experimental indentation outcomes (load-displacement curves or residual indent profiles). The simpler of the two involves direct “conversion” of the load-displacement curve. This is usually done [13] [14] by obtaining a series of “equivalent”, “effective” or “representative” values of the stress in the loaded part of the sample (from the applied load) and a corresponding set of values of the strain in the deformed region (from the displacement). The assumptions involved in carrying out such conversions are inevitably very crude, since (even for a spherical indenter) the fields of both stress and strain within the sample are highly complex and evolve throughout the process – the figure shows some typical plastic strain fields. Various empirical correction factors are commonly employed, with neural network “training” procedures sometimes being applied [15] [16] to sets of load-displacement data and corresponding stress-strain curves, to help evaluate them. It’s also common for loading to be periodically interrupted, and data from partial unloading procedures to be used in the conversion. However, unsurprisingly, universal conversions of this type (applied to samples with unknown stress-strain curves) tend to be unreliable [17] [18] [19] and it is now widely accepted that the procedure cannot be used with any confidence.

(a) FEM fields of equivalent plastic strain, after spherical indentation to a penetration ratio of about 20%, for as-extruded and annealed copper samples, and (b) corresponding measured and modelled indent profiles Fig-1 strain fields & profiles AR Ann Cu.jpg
(a) FEM fields of equivalent plastic strain, after spherical indentation to a penetration ratio of about 20%, for as-extruded and annealed copper samples, and (b) corresponding measured and modelled indent profiles

The other main approach is a more cumbersome one, although with much greater potential for obtaining reliable results. It involves iterative numerical (Finite element method – FEM) modelling of the indentation procedure. This is first done with a trial stress-strain relationship (in the form of an analytical expression – often termed a constitutive equation), followed by convergence on the best fit version (set of parameter values in the equation), giving optimal agreement between experimental and modelled outcomes (load-displacement plots or residual indent profiles). This procedure fully captures the complexity of the evolving stress and strain fields during indentation. While it is based on relatively intensive modelling computations, protocols have been developed in which the convergence is automated and rapid.

Profilometry-based indentation plastometry (PIP)

It has become clear that important advantages are offered by using the residual indent profile as the target outcome, rather than the load-displacement curve. These include easier measurement, greater sensitivity of the experimental outcome to the stress-strain relationship and potential for detection and characterisation of sample anisotropy – see above. The figure gives an indication of the sensitivity of the profile to the stress-strain curve of the material. The term PIP thus encompasses the following features: 1) Obtaining stress-strain curves characteristic of the bulk of a material (by using relatively large spherical indenters and relatively deep penetration), 2) Experimental measurement of the residual indent profile and 3) Iterative FEM simulation of the indentation test, to obtain the stress-strain curve (captured in a constitutive equation) that gives the best fit between modelled and measured profiles.

For tractable and user-friendly application, an integrated facility is needed, in which the procedures of indentation, profilometry and convergence on the optimal stress-strain curve are all under automated control

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Young's modulus</span> Mechanical property that measures stiffness of a solid material

Young's modulus, the Young modulus, or the modulus of elasticity in tension or compression, is a mechanical property that measures the tensile or compressive stiffness of a solid material when the force is applied lengthwise. It quantifies the relationship between tensile/compressive stress and axial strain in the linear elastic region of a material and is determined using the formula:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electron backscatter diffraction</span> Scanning electron microscopy technique

Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) is a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technique used to study the crystallographic structure of materials. EBSD is carried out in a scanning electron microscope equipped with an EBSD detector comprising at least a phosphorescent screen, a compact lens and a low-light camera. In this configuration, the SEM incident beam hits the tilted sample. As backscattered electrons leave the sample, they interact with the crystal's periodic atomic lattice planes and diffract according to Bragg's law at various scattering angles before reaching the phosphor screen forming Kikuchi patterns (EBSPs). EBSD spatial resolution depends on many factors, including the nature of the material under study and the sample preparation. Thus, EBSPs can be indexed to provide information about the material's grain structure, grains orientation, and phase at the micro-scale. EBSD is applied for impurities and defect studies, plastic deformation, and statistical analysis for average misorientation, grain size, and crystallographic texture. EBSD can also be combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), cathodoluminescence (CL), and wavelength dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (WDS) for advanced phase identification and materials discovery.

Indentation hardness tests are used in mechanical engineering to determine the hardness of a material to deformation. Several such tests exist, wherein the examined material is indented until an impression is formed; these tests can be performed on a macroscopic or microscopic scale.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crystal twinning</span> Two separate crystals sharing some of the same crystal lattice points in a symmetrical manner

Crystal twinning occurs when two or more adjacent crystals of the same mineral are oriented so that they share some of the same crystal lattice points in a symmetrical manner. The result is an intergrowth of two separate crystals that are tightly bonded to each other. The surface along which the lattice points are shared in twinned crystals is called a composition surface or twin plane.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lüders band</span> Bands of plastic deformation in metals

Lüders bands, is type of slip bands in metals or stretcher-strain marks which are formed due to localized bands of plastic deformation in metals experiencing tensile stresses, common to low-carbon steels and certain Al-Mg alloys. First reported by Guillaume Piobert, and later by W. Lüders, the mechanism that stimulates their appearance is known as dynamic strain aging, or the inhibition of dislocation motion by interstitial atoms, around which "atmospheres" or "zones" naturally congregate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fracture toughness</span> Stress intensity factor at which a cracks propagation increases drastically

In materials science, fracture toughness is the critical stress intensity factor of a sharp crack where propagation of the crack suddenly becomes rapid and unlimited. A component's thickness affects the constraint conditions at the tip of a crack with thin components having plane stress conditions and thick components having plane strain conditions. Plane strain conditions give the lowest fracture toughness value which is a material property. The critical value of stress intensity factor in mode I loading measured under plane strain conditions is known as the plane strain fracture toughness, denoted . When a test fails to meet the thickness and other test requirements that are in place to ensure plane strain conditions, the fracture toughness value produced is given the designation . Fracture toughness is a quantitative way of expressing a material's resistance to crack propagation and standard values for a given material are generally available.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yield (engineering)</span> Phenomenon of deformation due to structural stress

In materials science and engineering, the yield point is the point on a stress-strain curve that indicates the limit of elastic behavior and the beginning of plastic behavior. Below the yield point, a material will deform elastically and will return to its original shape when the applied stress is removed. Once the yield point is passed, some fraction of the deformation will be permanent and non-reversible and is known as plastic deformation.

In materials science, hardness is a measure of the resistance to localized plastic deformation induced by either mechanical indentation or abrasion. In general, different materials differ in their hardness; for example hard metals such as titanium and beryllium are harder than soft metals such as sodium and metallic tin, or wood and common plastics. Macroscopic hardness is generally characterized by strong intermolecular bonds, but the behavior of solid materials under force is complex; therefore, hardness can be measured in different ways, such as scratch hardness, indentation hardness, and rebound hardness. Hardness is dependent on ductility, elastic stiffness, plasticity, strain, strength, toughness, viscoelasticity, and viscosity. Common examples of hard matter are ceramics, concrete, certain metals, and superhard materials, which can be contrasted with soft matter.

Nanoindentation, also called instrumented indentation testing, is a variety of indentation hardness tests applied to small volumes. Indentation is perhaps the most commonly applied means of testing the mechanical properties of materials. The nanoindentation technique was developed in the mid-1970s to measure the hardness of small volumes of material.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cold spraying</span>

Gas dynamic cold spraying or cold spraying (CS) is a coating deposition method. Solid powders are accelerated in a supersonic gas jet to velocities up to ca. 1200 m/s. During impact with the substrate, particles undergo plastic deformation and adhere to the surface. To achieve a uniform thickness the spraying nozzle is scanned along the substrate. Metals, polymers, ceramics, composite materials and nanocrystalline powders can be deposited using cold spraying. The kinetic energy of the particles, supplied by the expansion of the gas, is converted to plastic deformation energy during bonding. Unlike thermal spraying techniques, e.g., plasma spraying, arc spraying, flame spraying, or high velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF), the powders are not melted during the spraying process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental stress cracking</span> Brittle failure of thermoplastic polymers

Environmental Stress Cracking (ESC) is one of the most common causes of unexpected brittle failure of thermoplastic polymers known at present. According to ASTM D883, stress cracking is defined as "an external or internal crack in a plastic caused by tensile stresses less than its short-term mechanical strength". This type of cracking typically involves brittle cracking, with little or no ductile drawing of the material from its adjacent failure surfaces. Environmental stress cracking may account for around 15-30% of all plastic component failures in service. This behavior is especially prevalent in glassy, amorphous thermoplastics. Amorphous polymers exhibit ESC because of their loose structure which makes it easier for the fluid to permeate into the polymer. Amorphous polymers are more prone to ESC at temperature higher than their glass transition temperature (Tg) due to the increased free volume. When Tg is approached, more fluid can permeate into the polymer chains.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nanoindenter</span>

A nanoindenter is the main component for indentation hardness tests used in nanoindentation. Since the mid-1970s nanoindentation has become the primary method for measuring and testing very small volumes of mechanical properties. Nanoindentation, also called depth sensing indentation or instrumented indentation, gained popularity with the development of machines that could record small load and displacement with high accuracy and precision. The load displacement data can be used to determine modulus of elasticity, hardness, yield strength, fracture toughness, scratch hardness and wear properties.

Severe plastic deformation (SPD) is a generic term describing a group of metalworking techniques involving very large strains typically involving a complex stress state or high shear, resulting in a high defect density and equiaxed "ultrafine" grain (UFG) size or nanocrystalline (NC) structure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tensile testing</span> Test procedure to determine mechanical properties of a specimen.

Tensile testing, also known as tension testing, is a fundamental materials science and engineering test in which a sample is subjected to a controlled tension until failure. Properties that are directly measured via a tensile test are ultimate tensile strength, breaking strength, maximum elongation and reduction in area. From these measurements the following properties can also be determined: Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, yield strength, and strain-hardening characteristics. Uniaxial tensile testing is the most commonly used for obtaining the mechanical characteristics of isotropic materials. Some materials use biaxial tensile testing. The main difference between these testing machines being how load is applied on the materials.

The Korsunsky work-of-indentation approach is a method of extracting values of hardness and stiffness for a small volume of material from indentation test data.

Dislocation avalanches are rapid discrete events during plastic deformation, in which defects are reorganized collectively. This intermittent flow behavior has been observed in microcrystals, whereas macroscopic plasticity appears as a smooth process. Intermittent plastic flow has been observed in several different systems. In AlMg Alloys, interaction between solute and dislocations can cause sudden jump during dynamic strain aging. In metallic glass, it can be observed via shear banding with stress localization; and single crystal plasticity, it shows up as slip burst. However, analysis of the events with orders-magnitude difference in sizes with different crystallographic structure reveals power-law scaling between the number of events and their magnitude, or scale-free flow.

Crystal plasticity is a mesoscale computational technique that takes into account crystallographic anisotropy in modelling the mechanical behaviour of polycrystalline materials. The technique has typically been used to study deformation through the process of slip, however, there are some flavors of crystal plasticity that can incorporate other deformation mechanisms like twinning and phase transformations. Crystal plasticity is used to obtain the relationship between stress and strain that also captures the underlying physics at the crystal level. Hence, it can be used to predict not just the stress-strain response of a material, but also the texture evolution, micromechanical field distributions, and regions of strain localisation. The two widely used formulations of crystal plasticity are the one based on the finite element method known as Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Method (CPFEM), which is developed based on the finite strain formulation for the mechanics, and a spectral formulation which is more computationally efficient due to the fast Fourier transform, but is based on the small strain formulation for the mechanics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biaxial tensile testing</span> Testing a materials tensile strength along two perpendicular axes

In materials science and solid mechanics, biaxial tensile testing is a versatile technique to address the mechanical characterization of planar materials. It is a generalized form of tensile testing in which the material sample is simultaneously stressed along two perpendicular axes. Typical materials tested in biaxial configuration include metal sheets, silicone elastomers, composites, thin films, textiles and biological soft tissues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slip bands in metals</span> Deformation mechanism in crystallines

Slip bands or stretcher-strain marks are localized bands of plastic deformation in metals experiencing stresses. Formation of slip bands indicates a concentrated unidirectional slip on certain planes causing a stress concentration. Typically, slip bands induce surface steps and a stress concentration which can be a crack nucleation site. Slip bands extend until impinged by a boundary, and the generated stress from dislocations pile-up against that boundary will either stop or transmit the operating slip depening on its (mis)orientation.

Angus J Wilkinson is a professor of materials science based at University of Oxford. He is a specialist in micromechanics, electron microscopy and crystal plasticity. He assists in overseeing the MicroMechanics group while focusing on the fundamentals of material deformation. He developed the HR-EBSD method for mapping stress and dislocation density at high spatial resolution used at the micron scale in mechanical testing and micro-cantilevers to extract data on mechanical properties that are relevant to materials engineering.

References

  1. ↑ Cheng, Y (2004). "Scaling, dimensional analysis, and indentation measurements". Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports. 44 (4–5): 91–149. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2004.05.001.
  2. ↑ Ostoja-Starzewski, M (2006). "Material Spatial Randomness: From Statistical to Representative Volume Element". Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 21 (2): 112–132. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.07.007.
  3. ↑ Roters, F (2010). "Overview of constitutive laws, kinematics, homogenization and multiscale methods in crystal plasticity finite-element modeling: Theory, experiments, applications". Acta Materialia. 58 (4): 1152–1211. Bibcode:2010AcMat..58.1152R. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.058.
  4. ↑ Voyiadjis, G (2017). "Review of Nanoindentation Size Effect: Experiments and Atomistic Simulation". Crystals. 7 (10): 321. doi: 10.3390/cryst7100321 .
  5. ↑ Bolzon, G (2004). "Material model calibration by indentation, imprint mapping and inverse analysis". International Journal of Solids and Structures. 41 (11–12): 2957–2975. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.01.025.
  6. ↑ Lee, J (2009). "Reverse analysis of nano-indentation using different representative strains and residual indentation profiles". Materials and Design. 30 (9): 3395–3404. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.030.
  7. ↑ Campbell, J (2019). "Comparison between stress-strain plots obtained from indentation plastometry, based on residual indent profiles, and from uniaxial testing". Acta Materialia. 168: 87–99. Bibcode:2019AcMat.168...87C. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.006.
  8. ↑ Bocciarelli, M (2005). "Parameter identification in anisotropic elastoplasticity by indentation and imprint mapping". Mechanics of Materials. 37 (8): 855–868. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2004.09.001.
  9. ↑ Yonezu, A (2009). "Estimation of the anisotropic plastic property using single spherical indentation - An FEM study". Computational Materials Science. 47 (2): 611–619. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.10.003.
  10. ↑ Zambaldi, C (2010). "Plastic anisotropy of gamma-TiAl revealed by axisymmetric indentation". Acta Materialia. 58 (9): 3516–3530. Bibcode:2010AcMat..58.3516Z. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.025. hdl: 11858/00-001M-0000-0019-3BCC-D .
  11. ↑ Zhan, X (2017). "Identification of plastic anisotropy using spherical indentation on different anisotropic yield criterions". Engineering Computations. 34 (7): 2268–2299. doi:10.1108/ec-01-2017-0015.
  12. ↑ Tang, Y (2021). "Use of Profilometry-based Indentation Plastometry to obtain Stress-Strain Curves from Small Superalloy Components made by Additive Manufacturing". Materialia. 15: 101017. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3746800. S2CID   234579523.
  13. ↑ Kim, J (2006). "Determination of Tensile Properties by Instrumented Indentation Technique: Representative Stress and Strain Approach". Surface and Coatings Technology. 201 (7): 4278–4283. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.054.
  14. ↑ Hernot, X (2014). "Study of the concept of representative strain and constraint factor introduced by Vickers indentation". Mechanics of Materials. 68: 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.07.004. S2CID   17603877.
  15. ↑ Huber, N (1999). "Determination of constitutive properties from spherical indentation data using neural networks. Part I: the case of pure kinematic hardening in plasticity laws". Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 47 (7): 1569–1588. Bibcode:1999JMPSo..47.1569H. doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(98)00109-4.
  16. ↑ Mahmoudi, A (2012). "An Alternative Approach to Determine Material Characteristics Using Spherical Indentation and Neural Networks for Bulk Metals" (PDF). Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 40 (2): 211–219. doi:10.1520/jte103897.
  17. ↑ Jeon, E (2009). "A Method for Estimating Uncertainty of Indentation Tensile Properties in Instrumented Indentation Test". Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology. 131 (3): 6. doi:10.1115/1.3120391.
  18. ↑ Chang, C (2018). "Representative Stress-Strain Curve by Spherical Indentation on Elastic-Plastic Materials". Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 8316384: 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2018/8316384 .
  19. ↑ Huang, F (2021). "Uncertainties in the representative indentation stress and strain using spherical nanoindentation". Applied Nanoscience. 13 (3): 895–909. Bibcode:2021ApNan..11..895H. doi:10.1007/s13204-020-01646-x. S2CID   231745165.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.