Institute for Science and International Security

Last updated

Founded1993
Founder David Albright
Type Think tank
Focus Nuclear nonproliferation [1]
Location
Area served
Predominantly United States of America
Key people
David Albright
Revenue
$538,050 (2022) [2]
Employees
4 [2]
Website www.isis-online.org

The Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) is a nonprofit, non-governmental institution to inform the public about "science and policy issues affecting international security". [1] Founded in 1993, the group is led by founder and former United Nations IAEA nuclear inspector David Albright, [3] and has been described as specializing "in analyzing the findings" of the IAEA. [4] ISIS was founded on a belief that scientists have an obligation to participate actively in solving major problems of national and international security. ISIS focuses primarily on four parts: 1) prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and related technology to other nations and terrorists, 2) lead to greater transparency of nuclear activities worldwide, 3) reinforce the international non-proliferation regime, and 4) cut down nuclear arsenals. Furthermore, ISIS seeks to build stable foundations for various efforts to reduce the threat posed by nuclear weapons to U.S. and international security by integrating technical, scientific and policy research. As the effectiveness of ISIS was recognized in the Global “Go-To Think Tanks” rankings, ISIS consistently places in the top 25 Science and Technology Think Tanks in the world and in 2015 placed as one of the top United States and foreign policy think tanks in the world. [5] [ promotion? ]

Contents

Board and funding

ISIS's board consists of the following members: [6]

ISIS has been funded by: [7] Ploughshares Fund, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Carnegie Corporation of New York, Colombe Foundation, New-Land Foundation, The Prospect Hill Foundation, United States Institute of Peace, The International Atomic Energy Agency, Ford Foundation, The Scherman Foundation, Smith Richardson Foundation, Compton Foundation, The Stanley Foundation, The John Merck Fund, The Rockefeller Foundation, The Rockefeller Brothers Fund, W. Alton Jones Foundation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, United States Department of Energy

Staff

ISIS's staff consists of the following people: [8]

Focus and analysis

The institute regularly publishes technical analyses of nuclear proliferation programs by examining technical data and satellite imagery. ISIS is cited in non-proliferation circles and in international media regarding its analysis. The majority of the current material produced by ISIS is focused on the analysis and monitoring of the nuclear programs of North Korea, Iran, Pakistan, Syria, and cases of worldwide illicit nuclear trade. [9]

Iraq

In August 1991, David Albright and Mark Hibbs, writing for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists wrote that there were many technological challenges unsolved with Iraq's nuclear program. Albright and Hibbs wrote that Iraq's nuclear program "was so primitive that the international sanctions put in place after the August 2 invasion may have had more substantive effect than the tons of bombs dropped by U.S. and allied planes five months later". [10]

In an October 2002 posting ISIS published a report which said "One of the most significant accomplishments of the intrusive inspections mandated by UN Security Council in 1991 is that Iraq is not believed to have nuclear weapons now. This single accomplishment demonstrates both the power and value of intrusive nuclear inspections in Iraq." The report further argued that "the nuclear inspection process provided a powerful deterrent against Iraq reconstituting its nuclear weapons program until inspectors left in late 1998." [11]

Iran

ISIS has been following since the 1990s the circumstances surrounding the Iranian nuclear program and has created a website dedicated to informing readers about the history of Iran's nuclear program and facilities, providing IAEA reports, providing information about diplomatic efforts, and providing ISIS technical assessments. [12] [ promotion? ]

A June 2009 posting on ISIS argued that "we do know that a lasting, military solution to Iran’s nuclear program is not realistic. This leaves diplomacy as the best route to bring about a suspension of Iran’s uranium enrichment program, regardless of who holds Iran’s presidency." [13]

On October 2, 2009 ISIS posted a subject to revision working document by IAEA safeguards experts which it described as an "Internal IAEA Document on Alleged Iranian Nuclear Weaponization". [14] The document led media to report that Iran has tested a two-point implosion design. [15] Gordon Oehler, who ran the CIA’s nonproliferation center and served as deputy director of the presidential commission on weapons of mass destruction, wrote “if someone has a good idea for a missile program, and he has really good connections, he’ll get that program through.. But that doesn’t mean there is a master plan for a nuclear weapon.” [16] Outside experts noted that the parts of the report made public lack many dates associated with Iran's alleged activities. [17] The Washington Post reported that "nowhere are there construction orders, payment invoices, or more than a handful of names and locations possibly connected to the projects." [18] Former IAEA Director Mohamed ElBaradei said the Agency didn't have any information that nuclear material has been used and didn't have any information that any components of nuclear weapons had been manufactured. [19] Iran asserted that the documents were a fabrication, while the IAEA urged Iran to be more cooperative and Member States to provide more information about the allegations to be shared with Iran. [20]

In December 2009, the conservative-leaning [21] [22] The Times , working with ISIS analysis, claimed that a document from an unnamed Asian intelligence agency described the use of a neutron source which has no use other than in a nuclear weapon, and claimed the document appeared to be from an office in Iran's Defense Ministry and may have been from around 2007. [23] [24] The Institute for Science and International Security, said that it “urges caution and further assessment” of the document and noted that "the document does not mention nuclear weapons .. and we have seen no evidence of an Iranian decision to build them.” [25] Western intelligence agencies did not give any authentication to the document, [25] while Russia noted that though the IAEA is in possession of these documents, the IAEA's findings "do not contain any conclusions about the presence of undeclared nuclear activities in Iran." [26] In response to allegations that the document was forged from Iran and some within the United States, [27] [28] Albright said ISIS felt "that this document does need to be authenticated, and we welcome a debate and actually a collecting [of] information from people, people who've done linguistic analysis, inside information". [29]

In March 2024, based on the report of the Institute for Science and International Security, Foreign Policy considers breakout time at zero. Referring to this report, Foreign Policy spoke about the change in American and European policies towards Iran. Citing examples of oil sales, economic growth, and Iran's military cooperation with other countries, Foreign Policy implicitly talks about the potential possibility of building nuclear weapons and Iran's nuclear deterrent power. [30]

Myanmar

In a January 28, 2010 report, ISIS found: "There remain sound reasons to suspect that the military regime in Burma might be pursuing a long-term strategy to make nuclear weapons. Despite the public reports to the contrary, the military junta does not appear to be close to establishing a significant nuclear capability. Information suggesting the construction of major nuclear facilities appears unreliable or inconclusive." [31] During an ASEAN meeting in Thailand in July 2009, US secretary of state Hillary Clinton highlighted concerns of the North Korean link. "We know there are also growing concerns about military cooperation between North Korea and Burma which we take very seriously", Clinton said. [32]

Reception

A National Journal profile in 2004 called Albright a "go-to guy for media people seeking independent analysis on Iraq’s [weapons of mass destruction] programs". [33]

In 2006, David Albright received the prestigious Joseph A. Burton Forum Award from the American Physical Society, a professional society of American physicists. He was cited for "his tireless and productive efforts to slow the transfer of nuclear weapons technology. He brings a unique combination of deep understanding, objectivity, and effectiveness to this vexed area." [34] [ promotion? ]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Atomic Energy Agency</span> International organization

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is an intergovernmental organization that seeks to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy and to inhibit its use for any military purpose, including nuclear weapons. It was established in 1957 as an autonomous organization within the United Nations system; though governed by its own founding treaty, the organization reports to both the General Assembly and the Security Council of the United Nations, and is headquartered at the UN Office at Vienna, Austria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons</span> International treaty

The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament. Between 1965 and 1968, the treaty was negotiated by the Eighteen Nation Committee on Disarmament, a United Nations-sponsored organization based in Geneva, Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear proliferation</span> Spread of nuclear weapons

Nuclear proliferation is the spread of nuclear weapons, fissionable material, and weapons-applicable nuclear technology and information to nations not recognized as "Nuclear Weapon States" by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT. Proliferation has been opposed by many nations with and without nuclear weapons, as governments fear that more countries with nuclear weapons will increase the possibility of nuclear warfare, de-stabilize international or regional relations, or infringe upon the national sovereignty of nation states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mohamed ElBaradei</span> Egyptian law scholar

Mohamed Mostafa ElBaradei is an Egyptian law scholar and diplomat who served as the vice president of Egypt on an interim basis from 14 July 2013 until his resignation on 14 August 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nyongbyon Nuclear Scientific Research Center</span> North Korean nuclear site

The Nyongbyon Nuclear Scientific Research Center (녕변원자력연구소) is North Korea's major nuclear facility, operating its first nuclear reactors. It is located in Nyongbyon County in North Pyongan Province, about 100 km north of Pyongyang. The center produced the fissile material for North Korea's six nuclear weapon tests from 2006 to 2017, and since 2009 is developing indigenous light water reactor nuclear power station technology.

Iran has research sites, two uranium mines, a research reactor, and uranium processing facilities that include three known uranium enrichment plants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Africa and weapons of mass destruction</span>

From the 1960s to the 1990s, South Africa pursued research into weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons under the apartheid government. South Africa’s nuclear weapons doctrine was designed for political leverage rather than actual battlefield use, specifically to induce the United States of America to intervene in any regional conflicts between South Africa and the Soviet Union or its proxies. To achieve a minimum credible deterrence, a total of six nuclear weapons were covertly assembled by the late 1980s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iran and weapons of mass destruction</span>

Iran is not known to currently possess weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and has signed treaties repudiating the possession of WMD including the Biological Weapons Convention, the Chemical Weapons Convention, and the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Iran has first-hand knowledge of WMD effects—over 100,000 Iranian troops and civilians were victims of chemical weapons during the 1980s Iran–Iraq War.

Operation Opera, also known as Operation Babylon, was a surprise airstrike conducted by the Israeli Air Force on 7 June 1981, which destroyed an unfinished Iraqi nuclear reactor located 17 kilometres southeast of Baghdad, Iraq. The Israeli operation came a year after the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force had caused minor damage to the same nuclear facility in Operation Scorch Sword, with the damage having been subsequently repaired by French technicians. Operation Opera, and related Israeli government statements following it, established the Begin Doctrine, which explicitly stated the strike was not an anomaly, but instead "a precedent for every future government in Israel". Israel's counter-proliferation preventive strike added another dimension to its existing policy of deliberate ambiguity, as it related to the nuclear weapons capability of other states in the region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Albright</span> Nuclear non-proliferation expert

David Albright, M.Sc., is an American physicist and a weapons expert who is the founder of the non-governmental Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), its current president, and author of several books on proliferation of atomic weapons.

This is the timeline of the nuclear program of Iran.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Syria and weapons of mass destruction</span>

Syria and weapons of mass destruction deals with the research, manufacture, stockpiling and alleged use by Syria of weapons of mass destruction, which include chemical and nuclear weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear facilities in Iran</span>

Iran's nuclear program is made up of a number of nuclear facilities, including nuclear reactors and various nuclear fuel cycle facilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">IR-40</span> Heavy water reactor in Arak, Iran

IR-40 also known as Arak Nuclear Complex is an Iranian 40 megawatt (thermal) heavy water reactor near Arak, adjacent to the 1990s era Arak Heavy Water Production Plant. Civil works for the construction began in October 2004. It was initially planned that the reactor would begin nuclear operations in 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ali Akbar Salehi</span> Iranian politician

Ali Akbar Salehi is an Iranian academic, diplomat and former head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, who served in this position from 2009 to 2010 and also from 2013 to 2021. He served for the first time as head of the AEOI from 2009 to 2010 and was appointed to the post for a second time on 16 August 2013. Before the appointment of his latter position, he was foreign affairs minister from 2010 to 2013. He was also the Iranian representative in the International Atomic Energy Agency from 1998 to 2003.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tehran International Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation</span> International Conference in Tehran, Iran

Iran convened a conference titled "International Disarmament and Non-proliferation: World Security without Weapons of Mass Destruction" on 17 and 18 April 2010 in Tehran. The theme of the conference was Nuclear Energy for All, Nuclear Weapons for No One.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fereydoon Abbasi</span> Iranian nuclear scientist (born 1958)

Fereydoon Abbasi-Davani is an Iranian nuclear scientist who was head of the Atomic Energy Organization from 2011 to 2013. He survived an assassination attempt in 2010, but was wounded. He is a conservative and principlist politician.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Middle East nuclear weapon free zone</span>

The Middle East nuclear weapon free zone (MENWFZ) is a proposed agreement similar to other nuclear-weapon-free zones. Steps towards the establishment of such a zone began in the 1960s led to a joint declaration by Egypt and Iran in 1974 which resulted in a General Assembly resolution. Following the 1995 NPT Review Conference, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) held a series of meetings involving experts and academics to consider ways to advance this process.

Views on the nuclear program of Iran vary greatly, as the nuclear program of Iran is a very contentious geopolitical issue. Uriel Abulof identifies five possible rationales behind Iran’s nuclear policy: (i) Economy, mainly energy needs; (ii) Identity politics, pride and prestige; (iii) Deterrence of foreign intervention; (iv) Compellence to boost regional influence; and (v) Domestic politics, mitigating, through 'nuclear diversion' the regime’s domestic crisis of legitimacy. Below are considerations of the Iranian nuclear program from various perspectives.

AMAD Project is an Iranian scientific project, started in 1989 and stopped in 2003 according to IAEA, that is suspected by Israel to have nonetheless continued, with the aim of developing nuclear weapons. Iran have denied the existence of any program aimed at the development of a nuclear explosive device, and in particular denied the existence of the AMAD Plan when reporting additional details to IAEA in 2015.

References

  1. 1 2 "Institute for Science and International Security: About ISIS". Isis-online.org. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  2. 1 2 "Institute For Science and International Security, IRS Filings". CauseIQ. 2023. Retrieved August 19, 2023.
  3. "Institute for Science and International Security: Staff". Isis-online.org. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  4. Sanger, David E.; Broad, William J. (September 13, 2021). "Iran Nears an Atomic Milestone". New York Times. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  5. "Institute for Science and International Security: About ISIS". Isis-online.org. Retrieved September 24, 2013.
  6. "Institute for Science and International Security: ISIS Board". Isis-online.org. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  7. "Institute for Science and International Security " About " ISIS Funders". Isis-online.org. Retrieved September 21, 2011.
  8. "Institute for Science and International Security: ISIS Principal Staff". Isis-online.org. Retrieved April 9, 2020.
  9. "ISIS Website". Isis-online.org. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  10. Albright, David; Mark Hibbs (March 1991). "Iraq and the bomb: Were they even close?". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 47 (2): 16–25. Bibcode:1991BuAtS..47b..16A. doi:10.1080/00963402.1991.11459944 . Retrieved August 4, 2009.
  11. "Institute for Science and International Security: Intrusive Inspections in the 1990s Means Iraq Lacks a Nuclear Arsenal Now". Isis-online.org. October 7, 2002. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  12. "Institute for Science and International Security". ISISNuclearIran. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  13. "Institute for Science and International Security: Beware the neocon agenda for Iran". Isisnucleariran.org. Archived from the original on August 3, 2012. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  14. "Institute for Science and International Security: Excerpts from Internal IAEA Document on Alleged Iranian Nuclear Weaponization" (PDF). Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  15. Julian Borger, diplomatic editor (November 5, 2009). "The Guardian: Iran tested advanced nuclear warhead design – secret report". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved November 30, 2011.{{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  16. "Iran Dope Arms Control Wonk: Concerns RV Not Warhead". Armscontrolwonk.com. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  17. "Iran's nuclear disclosures: why they matter". Archived from the original on October 20, 2009 via Christian Science Monitor.
  18. Linzer, Dafna (February 8, 2006). "Washington Post: Strong Leads and Dead Ends in Nuclear Case Against Iran". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  19. "International Atomic Energy Agency: Transcript of the IAEA Director General's Remarks at the Joint Press Conference with the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, October 4, 2009" (PDF).
  20. "Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008), and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran" (PDF). Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  21. Special to the New York Times (March 18, 1982). "The New York Times: New Editor Takes Over At Times of London". The New York Times. Great Britain; London (Eng). Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  22. "Voting Intention by Newspaper Readership". Ipsos Public Affairs. Retrieved November 30, 2011.[ permanent dead link ]
  23. Roland Watson and Sam Fleming (June 25, 2009). "Secret document exposes Iran's nuclear trigger". The Times. UK. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  24. "Document Sparks New Concerns About a Nuclear Iran". National Public Radio. December 17, 2009. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  25. 1 2 Broad, William J. (December 15, 2009). "Spy Agencies Are Puzzled by Nuclear Memo in Persian". The New York Times. Iran. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  26. "Secret documents on Iran must be verified: Russia's representative to IAEA | Politics | Trend". En.trend.az. December 25, 2009. Retrieved September 21, 2011.
  27. "U.S. Intelligence Found Iran Nuke Document Was Forged". Inter Press Service. Archived from the original on December 28, 2011. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  28. "Diane Sawyer Interviews Iranian President Ahmadinejad". ABC News. December 22, 2009. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  29. "Interview: Nuclear Expert Believes Iran Likely Wants Kazakh Uranium For Civil Purposes". Radio Free Europe. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  30. "Whatever Happened to Biden's Iran Policy?". Foreign Policy. March 26, 2024.
  31. "Burma: A Nuclear Wannabe; Suspicious Links to North Korea; High-Tech Procurements and Enigmatic Facilities". Institute for Science and International Security. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  32. "Myanmar building nuke reactor, says media report". The Times of India , August 2, 2009.
  33. Gregg Sangillo and Mark Kukis (May 25, 2004). "The Experts: Weapons Threat Nuclear, and Other, Worries". National Journal. Archived from the original on January 29, 2013. Retrieved August 26, 2012.
  34. "2006 Joseph A. Burton Forum Award Recipient". American Physical Society. July 27, 2011. Retrieved November 30, 2011.