Interdisciplinary bedside rounds

Last updated

In the domain of hospital medicine, interdisciplinary bedside rounds are a collaborative approach to patient care that involves the participation of the bedside nurse, primary provider, and the patient. [1] They are often joined by family members and allied health professionals such as the patient's pharmacist and case manager.

Contents

During interdisciplinary bedside rounds, these participants visit the patient's bedside together — a type of short, interdisciplinary care team meeting. The rounds are typically conducted for all of a provider's patients on a hospital unit, one after another, with each patient's primary nurse joining for his or her patients.

Unlike conventional hospital care in which medical professionals treat patients independently and with minimal coordination, Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds aim to foster real-time collaboration by having the whole care team converge at a patient's bedside to discuss their care and discharge plans.

This approach, by design, seeks to mitigate the risks associated with uncoordinated care, such as miscommunication, oversight, errors, and delays. Research on hospital teams show that teams make fewer mistakes than do individuals, and that team members know their responsibilities and those of their team members. [2] [3] [4]

Goals

Interdisciplinary bedside rounds aim to achieve several healthcare goals by embedding them into daily care routines:

Comparison with multidisciplinary rounds and medical rounds

Although IBRs, multidisciplinary rounds (MDRs), and medical rounds all aspire to enhance patient outcomes through collaboration, the three models diverge in their structure, focus, and execution. [9]

Multidisciplinary rounds (MDRs)

Definition: In MDRs, the healthcare team discusses patients outside the patient's presence, typically at a centralized location such as a nursing station or conference room.

Participants: MDRs are often brief "run the list" huddles between lead provider, case manager, and charge nurse, with a primary focus on discharge planning. Bedside nurses on the unit rarely attend MDRs, and if they do, they rarely have an active role.

Impact: Apart from these huddles, care providers in an MDR model largely function independently, leading to potential gaps in shared comprehension and decision-making, with different groups of health care professionals often working in isolation and with the illusion of teamwork. [10] [11]

Timing: MDRs can occur in the morning and/or afternoon

The actual execution of MDRs can vary from hospital to hospital and unit to unit. There is no official academic definition of multidisciplinary rounds.

Medical rounds

Definition: In medical rounds, also known as ward rounds, attending rounds, and safari rounds, [9] the lead provider rounds on his or her patient at the bedside. When conducted on a teaching unit with residents and interns, the focus is on medical education for the trainees.

Participants: Medical rounds can be conducted alone, or with a team of physicians, including junior doctors and medical students. If bedside nurses and other allied health professionals join, it is typically to observe and listen in.

Timing: Medical rounds typically occur in the morning

The actual execution of ward rounds can vary from hospital to hospital, unit to unit, physician to physician, and even day to day. Attending rounds have been called the "The HumptyDumptification of Medical Discourse" because of the nonstandard nature of what is covered. [12]

Interdisciplinary bedside rounds (IBRs)

In contrast, interdisciplinary bedside rounds aim to foster an integrated and collaborative approach to patient care. These rounds take place at the patient's bedside and involve the lead provider, multiple other healthcare professionals, and the patient and their family.

During IBRs, the different professions engage in a collective dialogue, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition, needs, and care plan. The inclusion of the patient and their family in the conversation also ensures that the care plan is tailored to the patient's needs and preferences. Inputs shared forward from multiple stakeholders are readily synthesized together to form a cohesive plan of care.

Multiple studies have found that interdisciplinary teams consistently outperform multidisciplinary teams across most evaluated metrics. [13] However, implementing successful IBRs can be challenging, leading to mixed outcomes. [14] [13]

Comparison and consequences

MDRs, due to their absence of real-time, all-inclusive communication, can potentially result in missed cues, misinterpretations, and delays that negatively affect patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Conversely, IBRs aim to minimize these hazards by promoting shared decision-making, [15] enhancing interprofessional communication, [6] and placing the patient at the heart of their care. [5] These factors collectively contribute to improved care coordination, patient satisfaction, and overall care outcomes.

Implementation challenges and solutions

IBRs can be more challenging to implement than MDRs, and these challenges have been studied in detail. [16] [17] The IBR literature includes solutions that hospital units have seen work for them. [5] [6] [7] [18] [19] [20]

Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds (SIBR rounds)

A well-known model of IBRs is structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds, abbreviated as SIBR rounds and pronounced "cyber."

SIBR follows a six-step process to create a shared mental model of who says what, when, and in what sequence when a care team enters the patient's room together. This structure is designed to ensure role clarity, consistency, efficiency, and sense-making.

History and development of SIBR

The concept of SIBR was developed by hospitalist and quality expert Dr. Jason Stein and colleagues at Emory University Hospital in the early 2010s. [26]

The SIBR model and its inventors have won several US national awards from the Society of Hospital Medicine and attracted international attention. [27] [28] [29] The insights were recognized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center.

Numerous studies of various SIBR units have shown substantial improvements for clinical, [7] [21] [23] [30] throughput, [5] [15] [20] [26] [31] cost [7] and patient/staff experience and engagement outcomes, [6] [20] [32] with some having failed to achieve desired outcomes. [33] [34]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emergency medicine</span> Medical specialty concerned with care for patients who require immediate medical attention

Emergency medicine is the medical speciality concerned with the care of illnesses or injuries requiring immediate medical attention. Emergency physicians specialize in providing care for unscheduled and undifferentiated patients of all ages. As first-line providers, in coordination with emergency medical services, they are primarily responsible for initiating resuscitation and stabilization and performing the initial investigations and interventions necessary to diagnose and treat illnesses or injuries in the acute phase. Emergency medical physicians generally practice in hospital emergency departments, pre-hospital settings via emergency medical services, and intensive care units. Still, they may also work in primary care settings such as urgent care clinics.

Palliative care is an interdisciplinary medical caregiving approach aimed at optimizing quality of life and mitigating suffering among people with serious, complex, and often terminal illnesses. Within the published literature, many definitions of palliative care exist. The World Health Organization (WHO) describes palliative care as "an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families facing the problems associated with life-threatening illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, physical, psychosocial, and spiritual". In the past, palliative care was a disease specific approach, but today the WHO takes a broader patient-centered approach that suggests that the principles of palliative care should be applied as early as possible to any chronic and ultimately fatal illness. This shift was important because if a disease-oriented approach is followed, the needs and preferences of the patient are not fully met and aspects of care, such as pain, quality of life, and social support, as well as spiritual and emotional needs, fail to be addressed. Rather, a patient-centered model prioritizes relief of suffering and tailors care to increase the quality of life for terminally ill patients.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intensive care medicine</span> Medical care subspecialty, treating critically ill

Intensive care medicine, also called critical care medicine, is a medical specialty that deals with seriously or critically ill patients who have, are at risk of, or are recovering from conditions that may be life-threatening. It includes providing life support, invasive monitoring techniques, resuscitation, and end-of-life care. Doctors in this specialty are often called intensive care physicians, critical care physicians, or intensivists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ambulatory care</span> Medical care provided for outpatients

Ambulatory care or outpatient care is medical care provided on an outpatient basis, including diagnosis, observation, consultation, treatment, intervention, and rehabilitation services. This care can include advanced medical technology and procedures even when provided outside of hospitals.

Hospital medicine is a medical specialty that exists in some countries as a branch of family medicine or internal medicine, dealing with the care of acutely ill hospitalized patients. Physicians whose primary professional focus is caring for hospitalized patients only while they are in the hospital are called hospitalists. Originating in the United States, this type of medical practice has extended into Australia and Canada. The vast majority of physicians who refer to themselves as hospitalists focus their practice upon hospitalized patients. Hospitalists are not necessarily required to have separate board certification in hospital medicine.

Patient safety is a discipline that emphasizes safety in health care through the prevention, reduction, reporting and analysis of error and other types of unnecessary harm that often lead to adverse patient events. The frequency and magnitude of avoidable adverse events, often known as patient safety incidents, experienced by patients was not well known until the 1990s, when multiple countries reported significant numbers of patients harmed and killed by medical errors. Recognizing that healthcare errors impact 1 in every 10 patients around the world, the World Health Organization (WHO) calls patient safety an endemic concern. Indeed, patient safety has emerged as a distinct healthcare discipline supported by an immature yet developing scientific framework. There is a significant transdisciplinary body of theoretical and research literature that informs the science of patient safety with mobile health apps being a growing area of research.

The doctor–patient relationship is a central part of health care and the practice of medicine. A doctor–patient relationship is formed when a doctor attends to a patient's medical needs and is usually through consent. This relationship is built on trust, respect, communication, and a common understanding of both the doctor and patients' sides. The trust aspect of this relationship goes is mutual: the doctor trusts the patient to reveal any information that may be relevant to the case, and in turn, the patient trusts the doctor to respect their privacy and not disclose this information to outside parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Narrative medicine</span> Medical approach

Narrative Medicine is the discipline of applying the skills used in analyzing literature to interviewing patients. The premise of narrative medicine is that how a patient speaks about his or her illness or complaint is analogous to how literature offers a plot with characters and is filled with metaphors, and that becoming conversant with the elements of literature facilitates understanding the stories that patients bring. Narrative Medicine is a diagnostic and comprehensive approach that utilizes patients' narratives in clinical practice, research, and education to promote healing. Beyond attempts to reach accurate diagnoses, it aims to address the relational and psychological dimensions that occur in tandem with physical illness. Narrative medicine aims not only to validate the experience of the patient, it also encourages creativity and self-reflection in the physician.

End-of-life care (EOLC) refers to health care provided in the time leading up to a person's death. End-of-life care can be provided in the hours, days, or months before a person dies and encompasses care and support for a person's mental and emotional needs, physical comfort, spiritual needs, and practical tasks.

A clinical pathway, also known as care pathway, integrated care pathway, critical pathway, or care map, is one of the main tools used to manage the quality in healthcare concerning the standardisation of care processes. It has been shown that their implementation reduces the variability in clinical practice and improves outcomes. Clinical pathways aim to promote organised and efficient patient care based on evidence-based medicine, and aim to optimise outcomes in settings such as acute care and home care. A single clinical pathway may refer to multiple clinical guidelines on several topics in a well specified context.

SBAR is an acronym for Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation; a technique that can be used to facilitate prompt and appropriate communication. This communication model has gained popularity in healthcare settings, especially amongst professions such as physicians and nurses. It is a way for health care professionals to communicate effectively with one another, and also allows for important information to be transferred accurately. The format of SBAR allows for short, organized and predictable flow of information between professionals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pediatric intensive care unit</span> Area within a hospital specializing in the care of critically ill infants, children, and teenagers

A pediatric intensive care unit, usually abbreviated to PICU, is an area within a hospital specializing in the care of critically ill infants, children, teenagers, and young adults aged 0–21. A PICU is typically directed by one or more pediatric intensivists or PICU consultants and staffed by doctors, nurses, and respiratory therapists who are specially trained and experienced in pediatric intensive care. The unit may also have nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physiotherapists, social workers, child life specialists, and clerks on staff, although this varies widely depending on geographic location. The ratio of professionals to patients is generally higher than in other areas of the hospital, reflecting the acuity of PICU patients and the risk of life-threatening complications. Complex technology and equipment is often in use, particularly mechanical ventilators and patient monitoring systems. Consequently, PICUs have a larger operating budget than many other departments within the hospital.

Shared decision-making in medicine (SDM) is a process in which both the patient and physician contribute to the medical decision-making process and agree on treatment decisions. Health care providers explain treatments and alternatives to patients and help them choose the treatment option that best aligns with their preferences as well as their unique cultural and personal beliefs.

The Omaha System is a standardized health care terminology consisting of an assessment component, a care plan/services component, and an evaluation component. Approximately 22,000 health care practitioners, educators, and researchers use Omaha System to improve clinical practice, structure documentation, and analyze secondary data. Omaha System users from Canada, China, The Czech Republic, Estonia, Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, The Netherlands, Turkey, the United States, and Wales, have presented at Omaha System International Conferences.

Clinical point of care (POC) is the point in time when clinicians deliver healthcare products and services to patients at the time of care.

Health care quality is a level of value provided by any health care resource, as determined by some measurement. As with quality in other fields, it is an assessment of whether something is good enough and whether it is suitable for its purpose. The goal of health care is to provide medical resources of high quality to all who need them; that is, to ensure good quality of life, cure illnesses when possible, to extend life expectancy, and so on. Researchers use a variety of quality measures to attempt to determine health care quality, including counts of a therapy's reduction or lessening of diseases identified by medical diagnosis, a decrease in the number of risk factors which people have following preventive care, or a survey of health indicators in a population who are accessing certain kinds of care.

A rapid response system (RRS) is a system implemented in many hospitals designed to identify and respond to patients with early signs of clinical deterioration on non-intensive care units with the goal of preventing respiratory or cardiac arrest. A rapid response system consists of two clinical components, an afferent component, an efferent component, and two organizational components – process improvement and administrative.

Patient satisfaction is a measure of the extent to which a patient is content with the health care which they received from their health care provider.

Cancer rehabilitation has been defined in the scientific literature as a distinct field of medicine that focuses on reducing or eliminating side-effects of cancer treatment and improving survivors' strength, ability to function and quality of life

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teaching hospital</span> Hospital or clinic providing medical education

A teaching hospital is a hospital or medical centre that provides medical education and training to future and current health professionals. Teaching hospitals are almost always affiliated with one or more universities and are often co-located with medical schools.

References

  1. ↑ Gonzalo JD, Kuperman E, Lehman E, Haidet P (August 2014). "Bedside interprofessional rounds: Perceptions of benefits and barriers by internal medicine nursing staff, attending physicians, and housestaff physicians". J Hosp Med. 9 (10): 646–651. doi:10.1002/jhm.2245. PMID   25130404.
  2. ↑ Smith-Jentsch KA, Salas E, Baker DP (December 1996). "Training team performance-related assertiveness". Pers Psychol. 49 (4): 909–936. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb02454.x.
  3. ↑ Volpe CE, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Spector PE (March 1996). "The impact of cross-training on team functioning: An empirical investigation". Hum. Factors. 38 (1): 87–100. doi:10.1518/001872096778940741. PMID   8682521. S2CID   43030853.
  4. ↑ Salas E, Sims DE, Burke CS (October 2005). "Is there a "Big Five" in Teamwork?". Small Group Research. 36 (5): 555–599. doi:10.1177/1046496405277134. S2CID   143395088.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Cao, Victor; Tan, Laren D.; Horn, Femke; Bland, David; Giri, Paresh; Maken, Kanwaljeet; Cho, Nam; Scott, Loreen; Dinh, Vi A.; Hidalgo, Derrek; Nguyen, H. Bryant (January 2018). "Patient-Centered Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds in the Medical ICU". Critical Care Medicine. 46 (1): 85–92. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002807. ISSN   0090-3493. PMID   29088002. S2CID   42618135.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Schwartz, Jeremy I; Gonzalez-Colaso, Rosana; Gan, Geliang; Deng, Yanhong; Kaplan, Michael H; Vakos, Patricia-Ann; Kenyon, Kathleen; Ashman, Amy; Sofair, Andre N; Huot, Stephen J; Chaudhry, Sarwat I (2021-01-12). "Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds improve interprofessional communication and workplace efficiency among residents and nurses on an inpatient internal medicine unit". Journal of Interprofessional Care: 1–8. doi:10.1080/13561820.2020.1863932. ISSN   1356-1820. PMID   33433262. S2CID   231584694.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Clay-Williams, Robyn; Plumb, Jennifer; Luscombe, Georgina M.; Hawke, Catherine; Dalton, Hazel; Shannon, Gabriel; Johnson, Julie (May 2018). "Improving Teamwork and Patient Outcomes with Daily Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds: A Multimethod Evaluation". Journal of Hospital Medicine. 13 (5): 311–317. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2850 . ISSN   1553-5592. PMID   29698537. S2CID   13862109.
  8. ↑ Cox, Elizabeth D.; Jacobsohn, Gwen C.; Rajamanickam, Victoria P.; Carayon, Pascale; Kelly, Michelle M.; Wetterneck, Tosha B.; Rathouz, Paul J.; Brown, Roger L. (2017-05-01). "A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial". Pediatrics. 139 (5). doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1688. ISSN   0031-4005. PMC   5404725 . PMID   28557720.
  9. 1 2 3 O'Hare, James A. (July 2008). "Anatomy of the ward round". European Journal of Internal Medicine. 19 (5): 309–313. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2007.09.016. PMID   18549930.
  10. ↑ Körner, Mirjam; Lippenberger, Corinna; Becker, Sonja; Reichler, Lars; Müller, Christian; Zimmermann, Linda; Rundel, Manfred; Baumeister, Harald (April 2014). McDermott, Aoife M (ed.). "Knowledge integration, teamwork and performance in health care". Journal of Health Organization and Management. 30 (2): 227–243. doi:10.1108/JHOM-12-2014-0217. ISSN   1477-7266. PMID   27052623.
  11. ↑ West, Michael A.; Lyubovnikova, Joanne (2013-03-15). "Illusions of team working in health care". Journal of Health Organization and Management. 27 (1): 134–142. doi:10.1108/14777261311311843. ISSN   1477-7266. PMID   23734481.
  12. ↑ Körner, Mirjam (August 2018). "Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: a comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team approach". Clinical Rehabilitation. 24 (8): 745–755. doi:10.1177/0269215510367538. ISSN   0269-2155. PMID   20530646. S2CID   4150666.
  13. 1 2 Ratelle, John T; Sawatsky, Adam P; Kashiwagi, Deanne T; Schouten, Will M; Erwin, Patricia J; Gonzalo, Jed D; Beckman, Thomas J; West, Colin P (April 2019). "Implementing bedside rounds to improve patient-centred outcomes: a systematic review". BMJ Quality & Safety. 28 (4): 317–326. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007778. ISSN   2044-5415. PMID   30224407. S2CID   52286940.
  14. ↑ Heip, Tine; Van Hecke, Ann; Malfait, Simon; Van Biesen, Wim; Eeckloo, Kristof (January 2022). "The Effects of Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds on Patient Centeredness, Quality of Care, and Team Collaboration: A Systematic Review". Journal of Patient Safety. 18 (1): e40–e44. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000695. ISSN   1549-8425. PMC   8719516 . PMID   32398542.
  15. 1 2 Basic, David; Huynh, Elizabeth; Gonzales, Rinaldo; Shanley, Chris (2018-11-08). "Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds, in-hospital deaths, and new nursing home placements among older inpatients". Clinical Interventions in Aging. 13: 2289–2294. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S171508 . PMC   6233858 . PMID   30519010.
  16. ↑ O'Leary, Kevin J; Killarney, Audrey; Hansen, Luke O; Jones, Sasha; Malladi, Megan; Marks, Kelly; M Shah, Hiren (December 2016). "Effect of patient-centred bedside rounds on hospitalised patients' decision control, activation and satisfaction with care". BMJ Quality & Safety. 25 (12): 921–928. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004561. ISSN   2044-5415. PMID   26628552. S2CID   46595605.
  17. ↑ Walton, Victoria; Hogden, Anne; Long, Janet C.; Johnson, Julie K.; Greenfield, David (2019-12-11). "How Do Interprofessional Healthcare Teams Perceive the Benefits and Challenges of Interdisciplinary Ward Rounds". Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 12: 1023–1032. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S226330 . PMC   6912018 . PMID   31849478.
  18. ↑ Pannick, Samuel; Wachter, Robert M; Vincent, Charles; Sevdalis, Nick (2016-10-18). "Rethinking medical ward quality". BMJ. 355: i5417. doi:10.1136/bmj.i5417. hdl: 10044/1/41514 . ISSN   1756-1833. PMID   27756729. S2CID   32871706.
  19. ↑ Martin, Graham P.; Finn, Rachael (November 2011). "Patients as team members: opportunities, challenges and paradoxes of including patients in multi-professional healthcare teams: Patients as team members". Sociology of Health & Illness. 33 (7): 1050–1065. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01356.x . hdl: 2381/10028 . PMID   21668454.
  20. 1 2 3 Lopez, Merrick; Vaks, Yana; Wilson, Michele; Mitchell, Kenneth; Lee, Christina; Ejike, Janeth; Oei, Grace; Kaufman, Danny; Hambly, Jamie; Tinsley, Cynthia; Bahk, Thomas; Samayoa, Carlos; Pappas, James; Abd-Allah, Shamel (May 2019). "Impacting Satisfaction, Learning, and Efficiency Through Structured Interdisciplinary Rounding in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project". Pediatric Quality & Safety. 4 (3): e176. doi:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000176. ISSN   2472-0054. PMC   6594789 . PMID   31579875.
  21. 1 2 Grogean, Thomas S; DeMarco, William (April 2023). "More data, fewer problems: Reducing variability of structured interdisciplinary rounds". Journal of Hospital Medicine. 18 (S1). doi:10.1002/jhm.13090. ISSN   1553-5592.
  22. ↑ Bryson, Christine; Boynton, Greta; Stepczynski, Anna; Garb, Jane; Kleppel, Reva; Irani, Farzan; Natanasabapathy, Siva; Stefan, Mihaela S (2017-08-08). "Geographical assignment of hospitalists in an urban teaching hospital: feasibility and impact on efficiency and provider satisfaction". Hospital Practice. 45 (4): 135–142. doi:10.1080/21548331.2017.1353884. ISSN   2154-8331. PMC   6954492 . PMID   28707548.
  23. 1 2 Loertscher, Laura; Wang, Lian; Sanders, Shelley Schoepflin (2021-07-04). "The impact of an accountable care unit on mortality: an observational study". Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives. 11 (4): 554–557. doi:10.1080/20009666.2021.1918945. ISSN   2000-9666. PMC   8221162 . PMID   34211668.
  24. ↑ Radhakrishnan, Nila S; Lukose, Kiran; Cartwright, Richard; Sleiman, Andressa; Matey, Nicholas; Lim, Duke; LeGault, Tiffany; Pollard, Sapheria; Gravina, Nicole; Southwick, Frederick S (December 2022). "Prospective application of the interdisciplinary bedside rounding checklist 'TEMP' is associated with reduced infections and length of hospital stay". BMJ Open Quality. 11 (4): e002045. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002045. ISSN   2399-6641. PMC   9723909 . PMID   36588303.
  25. ↑ Al Halabi, Anas; Habas, Elmukhtar; Farfar, Khalifa L; Ghazouani, Hafedh; Alfitori, Gamal; Abdulla, Moza A; Borham, Abdelsalam M; Khan, Fahmi Y (2023-04-21). "Time Spent on Medical Round Activities, Distance Walked, and Time-Motion in the General Medicine Department at Hamad General Hospital in Qatar". Cureus. 15 (4): e37935. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37935 . ISSN   2168-8184. PMC   10200253 . PMID   37220459.
  26. 1 2 3 Stein, Jason; Payne, Christina; Methvin, Amanda; Bonsall, Joanna M.; Chadwick, Liam; Clark, Diaz; Castle, Bryan W.; Tong, David; Dressler, Daniel D. (January 2015). "Reorganizing a hospital ward as an accountable care unit: Reorganizing a Hospital Ward". Journal of Hospital Medicine. 10 (1): 36–40. doi:10.1002/jhm.2284. PMID   25399928.
  27. ↑ Shank, Brendon (May 5, 2015). "Society of Hospital Medicine Names 2015 Excellence Award Winners". The Hospitalist. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  28. ↑ Caldwell, Gordon (June 23, 2022). "Dr Gordon Caldwell - Tweet". Twitter. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  29. ↑ Clinical Excellence Commission, 2014, Clinical Excellence Commission Year in Review 2013-14, pp. 36. Sydney: Clinical Excellence Commission
  30. ↑ Basic, David; Huynh, Elizabeth T.; Gonzales, Rinaldo; Shanley, Christopher G. (March 2021). "Twice-Weekly Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds and Falls among Older Adult Inpatients". Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 69 (3): 779–784. doi:10.1111/jgs.17007. ISSN   0002-8614. PMID   33395498. S2CID   230666210.
  31. ↑ Sunkara, Padageshwar R; Islam, Tareq; Bose, Abhishek; Rosenthal, Gary E; Chevli, Parag; Jogu, Hanumantha; Tk, Luqman Arafath; Huang, Chi-Cheng; Chaudhary, Dipendra; Beekman, Daniel; Dutta, Abhishek; Menon, Suma; Speiser, Jaime L (July 2020). "Impact of structured interdisciplinary bedside rounding on patient outcomes at a large academic health centre". BMJ Quality & Safety. 29 (7): 569–575. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009936. ISSN   2044-5415. PMC   10189805 . PMID   31810994.
  32. ↑ Gausvik, Christian; Lautar, Ashley; Miller, Lisa; Pallerla, Harini; Schlaudecker, Jeffrey (January 2015). "Structured nursing communication on interdisciplinary acute care teams improves perceptions of safety, efficiency, understanding of care plan and teamwork as well as job satisfaction". Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 8: 33–37. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S72623 . ISSN   1178-2390. PMC   4298312 . PMID   25609978.
  33. ↑ Huynh, Elizabeth; Basic, David; Gonzales, Rinaldo; Shanley, Chris (2017). "Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds do not reduce length of hospital stay and 28-day re-admission rate among older people hospitalised with acute illness: an Australian study". Australian Health Review. 41 (6): 599–605. doi: 10.1071/AH16019 . ISSN   0156-5788. PMID   27883874.
  34. ↑ Jala, Sheila; Giaccari, Sarah; Passer, Melissa; Bertmar, Carin; Day, Susan; Griffith, Dayna; Krause, Martin (January 2019). ""In Safe Hands" – A costly integrated care program with limited benefits in stroke unit care". Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 59: 84–88. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.135. PMID   30409533. S2CID   53217177.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.