Intergenerational Fairness Day

Last updated

The Intergenerational Fairness Day (IFD) is celebrated annually on 16 November and was proclaimed as a worldwide day of action by an international network of non-partisan organisations that exist to protect the rights of younger and future generations. According to the organising network, the day was created with the goal of being recognised by the United Nations as an official international day. [1] [2] The UN observes various days to commemorate efforts in favour of human rights, climate, or youth (e.g., World Children's Day – 20th November, Human Rights Day – 10th December, International Women's Day – 8th March, World Water Day – 22th March, etc.). [3]

Contents

Held for the first time in 2023, it is an initiative to raise awareness for the increasing unfairness that today's youth and future generations are experiencing due to a lack of adequate government intervention and policy reform. [4] Parliament, citizens and the media discuss the future once a year, on 16 November, informing themselves on topics that concern intergenerational justice. [5] The inofficial holiday addresses existential risks such as accelerating global warming,escalating (nuclear) arms races, the loss of biodiversity, unaligned artificial intelligence, and human-made pandemics, as well as intergenerationally unfair public policies, rapidly growing national debts, the cost-of-living crisis, high housing costs, and eroding pensions. [5]

On the 16th of November organisations from the United States, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Japan, Australia, Nigeria and the United Nations Foundation call for greater intergenerational fairness so that the interests of younger and future generations are better protected both nationally and internationally. [4]

Intergenerational Fairness

Intergenerational fairness is a fundamental principle that holds far-reaching implications for societies and the well-being of both current and future generations. [6] [7] This concept underscores the equitable treatment of individuals of all ages, ensuring that the interests and needs of each generation are taken into consideration, addressing a range of significant societal, ethical, and economic concerns. [7] [8] However, it is often noted that democracy tends to be biased towards the present. [9] [10] Scholars, like Dennis F. Thompson, often describe that due to the political system's focus on achieving immediate results within a single term, the long-term consequences of political decisions are often challenging to determine. [11] [12] [13] It is argued that future generations are not well-represented in the political process, while the percentage of elderly voters continues to increase, leading to a potential imbalance in the representation of different age groups. [14] [15] As a result, long-term challenges that will impact future generations may receive limited political or public attention. [16] [17] See also Intergenerational equity.

Intergenerational Fairness Day emphasizes the importance of policies that take into account society's long-term needs, safeguard the rights of future generations, respect planetary limits, and prevent the deferral of costs without corresponding benefits. [18] This necessitates policies that make long-term investments, address persistent issues effectively, and promote democratic values. [13] Intergenerational equity-based policies aim to tackle issues such as public debt, provision of social safety nets, and investment in infrastructure and education. [19] Neglecting these issues can lead to economic crises that can affect younger generations disproportionately. [20] [21] Equitable distribution of opportunities and resources across generations is essential to ensure fairness for all members of society. [22] Sustainable economic systems, prudent resource management, and environmental stewardship are vital for leaving behind a healthy ecosystem with adequate resources and a stable climate for future generations. [23] Intergenerational fairness aims to reduce social, political, economic, and environmental inequalities to achieve this.

Organisations

Foundation for the Rights of Future Generations

Foundation for the Rights of Future Generations (FRFG), also known as Stiftung für die Rechte zukünftiger Generationen (SRzG), is a German think tank and activist group focused on intergenerational justice and sustainability. [24] Established in 1997, the foundation is based in Stuttgart, Germany. The FRFG has been called the most important extra-parliamentary think tank on the topic of intergenerational justice in Germany, and has members from around the world. The organization rose to national prominence while campaigning to include a provision for sustainability and the protection of future generations into the German constitution. It has also campaigned for age-independent voting rights.

Intergenerational Foundation

The Intergenerational Foundation (IF) is a research and education charity that was established in 2011. The organisation's primary objective is to promote fairness between generations and protect the interests of younger and future generations in all policy areas. [25] IF is an independent, non-partisan charity, and funded by "no-strings" donations from trusts, foundations, individual supporters, and corporates who share their vision. [26] IF's work has aided to highlight several areas of intergenerational unfairness in the UK, including the housing crisis and unaffordability; the pension settlement between the generations; high taxation facing younger generations; reduced spending on younger generations; a lack of long-term planning or investment; the climate crisis and the need to move more swiftly towards a low carbon society; and high student debt facing young people in England and Wales. [27]

Berkeley Institute for Young Americans  

The Berkeley Institute for Young Americans (BIFYA) is a research institute at the University of California, Berkeley. [28] They conduct research to gain a better understanding of the challenges faced by younger generations. Their aim is to develop public policy interventions that can help solve these issues. [29]

GenerationSqueeze

Generation Squeeze is a charitable Think and Change Tank promoting wellbeing for all generations. [30] They see generational unfairness as a root cause of unaffordable housing, the high cost of raising a family, mounting climate risks, growing government debt, and rising medical costs that crowd out investments in wellbeing and seek to champion intergenerational fairness. [31]

MillionGenerations

The milliongenerations foundation in The Netherlands exists from 2009 to 2034 to make it more likely that the future is very long. [32] It helped to start The Letters of Utrecht in 2012 and the collaboration of Long term art projects LTAP in 2022. [33] On its website milliongenerations.org registered users can discuss topics such as the rights of future generations, existential risks and surviving progress.

Think Forward

Think Forward was founded in response to an observed trend that young people in Australia may face an economic burden that is distinct from previous generations. [34] Current tax and economic policies may result in young people underwriting the lives of older Australians to an unprecedented extent. Due to several factors, such as the increase in insecure work, rising housing costs, and the impacts of the climate crisis, Australia's millennial generation may be at risk of having worse economic outcomes than prior generations. They aim to create a society that prioritises intergenerational fairness by advocating for policy changes, undertaking research and analysis, and educating younger generations. [35]

Future Design

The Future Design movement is a model to overcome short-termism in democratic decision-making. Inspired by the traditional principle of seventh-generation decision-making, it is about strengthening intergenerational justice. [36] This movement revolves around a model of participatory decision-making. It invites residents to set long-term plans for their towns and cities, not just from their perspective but by stepping into the shoes of their peers in 2060, as they leap into the future. [37] This imaginative leap results in more transformative city plans, driven by the realization that choices today profoundly impact tomorrow. [38] This model has already influenced policy planning in various Japanese towns and cities, creating a more intergenerationally-aware approach to decision-making. [39]

Partnership for Future Generations in Africa

The Partnership for Future Generations in Africa is a project sponsored by Effective Altruism Nigeria. The PFGA is a continental initiative aiming to amplify young voices in Africa for effective advocacy and protection of the rights and interests of younger and future generations. [40] This initiative aims to mainstream intragenerational fairness and intergenerational solidarity in African policy spaces.

Next Generation Fellows

The Next Generation Fellows are advocating for a future that is equitable and just for young people and future generations. [41] The United Nations Foundation established the Next Generation Fellows program to respond to the UN Secretary-General's request for young people to shape the Our Common Agenda report. [42]  These fellows are positioned across the global system to drive local solutions, considering young people's and future generation's interests. Their vision is to create a society where opportunities are abundant and accessible, and they aim to make intergenerational fairness a reality in the global system and its policy agenda. [43]

See also

Related Research Articles

The Heinrich Böll Foundation is a German, legally independent political foundation. Affiliated with Alliance 90/The Greens, it was founded in 1997 when three predecessors merged. The foundation was named after German writer Heinrich Böll (1917–1985).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intergenerational equity</span> Concept of fairness or justice between generations

Intergenerational equity in economic, psychological, and sociological contexts, is the idea of fairness or justice between generations. The concept can be applied to fairness in dynamics between children, youth, adults, and seniors. It can also be applied to fairness between generations currently living and future generations.

Foundation for the Rights of Future Generations (FRFG), also known as Stiftung für die Rechte zukünftiger Generationen (SRzG), is a German think tank and activist group focused on intergenerational justice and sustainability. Established in 1997, the foundation is based in Stuttgart, Germany. The FRFG has been called the most important extra-parliamentary think tank on the topic of intergenerational justice in Germany, and has members from around the world. The organization rose to national prominence while campaigning to include a provision for sustainability and the protection of future generations into the German constitution. It has also campaigned for age-independent voting rights. FRFG publishes the English-language journal Intergenerational Justice Review in collaboration with the University of Tübingen and the Intergenerational Foundation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cultural economics</span> Branch of economics

Cultural economics is the branch of economics that studies the relation of culture to economic outcomes. Here, 'culture' is defined by shared beliefs and preferences of respective groups. Programmatic issues include whether and how much culture matters as to economic outcomes and what its relation is to institutions. As a growing field in behavioral economics, the role of culture in economic behavior is increasingly being demonstrated to cause significant differentials in decision-making and the management and valuation of assets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mo Ibrahim Foundation</span> Foundation focusing on leadership in Africa

The Mo Ibrahim Foundation is an African non-grant foundation founded in 2006 by businessman Mo Ibrahim. Headquartered in London and Dakar, Senegal, it works to strengthen governance and leadership in Africa through its key initiatives:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporate sustainability</span> Business strategy that focuses on sustainability as a core aspect of the business

Corporate sustainability is an approach aiming to create long-term stakeholder value through the implementation of a business strategy that focuses on the ethical, social, environmental, cultural, and economic dimensions of doing business. The strategies created are intended to foster longevity, transparency, and proper employee development within business organizations. Firms will often express their commitment to corporate sustainability through a statement of Corporate Sustainability Standards (CSS), which are usually policies and measures that aim to meet, or exceed, minimum regulatory requirements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate justice</span> Concept for social justice in climate change context

Climate justice is a type of environmental justice that focuses on the unequal impacts of climate change on marginalized or otherwise vulnerable populations. Climate justice seeks to achieve an equitable distribution of both the burdens of climate change and the efforts to mitigate climate change. The economic burden of climate change mitigation is estimated by some at around 1% to 2% of GDP. Climate justice examines concepts such as equality, human rights, collective rights, justice and the historical responsibilities for climate change.

Intergenerationality is interaction between members of different generations. Sociologists study many intergenerational issues, including equity, conflict, and mobility.

Equity feminism is a form of liberal feminism that advocates the state's equal treatment of women and men without challenging inequalities perpetuated by employers, educational and religious institutions, and other elements of society. The concept has been discussed since the 1980s. Equity feminism has been defined and classified as a kind of classically liberal or libertarian feminism, in contrast with social feminism, difference feminism, gender feminism, and equality feminism.

Demeny voting is a type of proxy voting where the provision of a political voice for children by allowing parents or guardians to vote on their behalf. The term is named after demographer Paul Demeny, though the concept predates him. It is often proposed as a measure to ensure the (indirect) representation of children who are considered too young to vote. Under a Demeny voting system, parents would cast a proxy vote for their child, possibly allowing for a split weighted vote if the parents' political views differ.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Weak and strong sustainability</span>

Weak and strong sustainability are terms that have emerged from the field of environmental economics and describe opposing approaches to sustainability, specifically in relation to natural resource management and economic development. Weak sustainability argues that natural and human capital are interchangeable, meaning that the use or loss of natural capital can be considered sustainable if the human capital meets or exceeds the value of the natural capital. It assumes that different types of value can be measured and given value in the same way. Strong sustainability argues that natural capital should be maintained or enhanced independently of human-made capital. It considers that certain natural assets are incommensurable and have critical ecological functions that cannot be substituted by human-made alternatives.

The Intergenerational Foundation (IF) is a charitable UK-based thinktank established to promote fairness between generations. IF believe that each generation should pay its own way, which - they claim - is not happening at present. They postulate that British policy-makers have given undue advantages to the older generation at the expense of younger and future generations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Future generations</span> People yet to be born

Future generations are cohorts of hypothetical people not yet born. Future generations are contrasted with current and past generations and evoked in order to encourage thinking about intergenerational equity. The moral patienthood of future generations has been argued for extensively among philosophers, and is thought of as an important, neglected cause by the effective altruism community. The term is often used in describing the conservation or preservation of cultural heritage or natural heritage.

Joanne Ninive Smith is a first-generation Haitian-American social worker and activist born and raised in New York City. She is the executive director and founder of the Brooklyn-based non-profit organization, Girls for Gender Equity. Smith has organized around the issues of gender equality, racial justice, school pushout, sexual harassment, police brutality, the criminalization of black girls in schools and violence against transgender and gender non-conforming people of color.

<i>Oposa v. Factoran</i> Landmark case in the Philippines

Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, 224 S.C.R.A. 792 (1993), alternatively titled Minors Oposa v. Factoran or Minors Oposa, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines recognizing the doctrine of intergenerational responsibility on the environment in the Philippine legal system. The case is a contributor to the development of international environmental law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maja Göpel</span> German political economist and university teacher

Maja Göpel is a German political economist, transformation researcher, and sustainability scientist with a focus on transdisciplinary. In 2019 she co-founded the Scientists for Future initiative. Göpel is an honorary professor at Leuphana University of Lüneburg.

Jörg Tremmel is a political theorist and philosopher. He is a professor at Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change ethics</span>

Climate change ethics is a field of study that explores the moral aspects of climate change. Climate change is often studied and addressed by scientists, economists, and policymakers in value neutral ways. However, phillosophers such as Stephen M. Gardiner and the scientific authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), argue that decisions related to climate change are moral issues and involve value judgment. Climate change involves difficult moral questions relating to global inequality and human development, who bears responsibility for past emissions, as well as the role of future generations, personal responsibility and many more.

Lukas H. Meyer is a German philosopher, academic and author. He is a university professor as well as speaker of the working section Moral and Political Philosophy at the University of Graz.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Fair Start Movement</span>

The Fair Start Movement is a children's rights movement that advocates for intergenerational justice, including black birth equity as an overriding human right. It does so through equity-based birth entitlements to improve the environmental and social conditions into which children are born - using metrics like the Children's Rights Convention. The movement considers these entitlements a fundamental condition of self-determination, the basis for political legitimacy. Proposed investments include incentives for fertility delay, baby bonds, and climate migration funds to assist families relocating to safer areas that will be less impacted by the climate crisis. The Fair Start Movement has the potential to serve as a vehicle for climate reparations.

References

  1. ↑ "Intergenerational Justice" (in German). Retrieved 2024-01-22.
  2. ↑ "Intergenerational Fairness Day - Milliongenerations". www.milliongenerations.org. Retrieved 2024-01-22.
  3. ↑ Nations, United. "List of International Days and Weeks". United Nations. Retrieved 2024-01-22.
  4. 1 2 "The world's first Intergenerational Fairness Day". Generation Squeeze. Retrieved 2023-11-15.
  5. 1 2 "Intergenerational Justice" (in German). Retrieved 2023-11-15.
  6. ↑ Fleurbaey, Marc (2007). "Intergenerational Fairness". In Roemer, John; Suzumura, Kotaro (eds.). Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 155–175. doi:10.1057/9780230236769_10. ISBN   978-0-230-23676-9.
  7. 1 2 Tremmel, Jörg (2014). A theory of intergenerational justice. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN   978-0-415-84578-6.
  8. ↑ Fleurbaey, Marc (2007). "Intergenerational Fairness". In Roemer, John; Suzumura, Kotaro (eds.). Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 155–175. doi:10.1057/9780230236769_10. ISBN   978-0-230-23676-9.
  9. ↑ Schmidt, Manfred G. (2019). "Demokratietheorien". SpringerLink. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-25839-9. ISBN   978-3-658-25838-2.
  10. ↑ Kates, Michael (2015-09-03). "Justice, democracy, and future generations". Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 18 (5): 508–528. doi:10.1080/13698230.2013.861655. ISSN   1369-8230. S2CID   145471590.
  11. ↑ Thompson, Dennis F. (March 2010). "Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship". Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 13 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1080/13698230903326232. ISSN   1369-8230. S2CID   4325465.
  12. ↑ Levinson, Daryl J. (January 2011). "Parchments and Politics. The Positive Puzzle of Constitutional Commitment". Harvard Law Review. 124 (3): 657–748.
  13. 1 2 Rose, Michael (2016). "Constitutions, Democratic Self-Determination and the Institutional Empowerment of Future Generations: Mitigating an Aporia". Intergenerational Justice Review. 9 (2): 56–71. doi:10.24357/igjr.9.2.549. SSRN   3795580.
  14. ↑ Wilkoszewski, Harald (13 August 2009). "Age Trajectories of Social Policy Preferences – Support for Intergenerational Transfers from a Demographic Perspective". APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. SSRN   1451738.
  15. ↑ Doeleman, Jacobus A.; Sandler, Todd (1998). "The Intergenerational Case of Missing Markets and Missing Voters". Land Economics. 74 (1): 1–15. doi:10.2307/3147209. ISSN   0023-7639. JSTOR   3147209.
  16. ↑ Gesang, Bernward (2018). "Wie sollte eine Demokratie aussehen, die Nachhaltigkeit kann?". In Mannewitz, Tom (ed.). Die Demokratie und ihre Defekte: Analysen und Reformvorschläge (in German). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. pp. 87–105. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-20848-6_5. ISBN   978-3-658-20848-6.
  17. ↑ Lagerspetz, Eerik (1999-01-01). "Rationality and politics in long-term decisions". Biodiversity & Conservation. 8 (1): 149–164. doi:10.1023/A:1008821427812. ISSN   1572-9710. S2CID   27661391.
  18. ↑ Tremmel, Jörg (2012-10-09), Eine Theorie der Generationengerechtigkeit (in German), Brill mentis, doi: 10.30965/9783957439437 , ISBN   978-3-95743-943-7 , retrieved 2023-11-10
  19. ↑ MacKenzie, Michael Kenneth (September 2013). "Future Publics: Long-Term Thinking and Farsighted Action in Democratic Systems". The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies: The University of British Columbia (Vancouver).
  20. ↑ Jacobs, Alan M.; Matthews, J. Scott (2012). "Why Do Citizens Discount the Future? Public Opinion and the Timing of Policy Consequences". British Journal of Political Science. 42 (4): 903–935. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000117. ISSN   0007-1234. JSTOR   23274172.
  21. ↑ Glantz, Michael, ed. (1999). Creeping Environmental Problems and Sustainable Development in the Aral Sea Basin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535970. ISBN   978-0-521-62086-4.
  22. ↑ Cassell, Mark K. (2011). "Review of Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment". Political Science Quarterly. 126 (4): 694–696. doi:10.1002/j.1538-165X.2011.tb02197.x. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   41502482.
  23. ↑ Woodward, Richard T. (August 2000). "Sustainability as Intergenerational Fairness: Efficiency, Uncertainty, and Numerical Methods". American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 82 (3): 581–593. doi:10.1111/0002-9092.00048. hdl: 10.1111/0002-9092.00048 . ISSN   0002-9092. S2CID   56229119.
  24. ↑ "Intergenerational Justice" (in German). Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  25. ↑ "Intergenerational Foundation". onthinktanks.org. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  26. ↑ "Home". Intergenerational Foundation. 2023-11-08. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  27. ↑ "Campaigns". Intergenerational Foundation. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  28. ↑ "Berkeley Institute for Young Americans – The Berkeley Institute for Young Americans seeks to make public policy sustainable and fair across generations" . Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  29. ↑ "Berkeley Institute for Young Americans | Research UC Berkeley". vcresearch.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  30. ↑ "Generation Squeeze". Generation Squeeze. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  31. ↑ Ronson, Jacqueline (2022-11-04). "Older Canadians want to leave a better world for their children. Why hasn't that happened?". The Discourse. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  32. ↑ "Milliongenerations". milliongenerations.org. Retrieved 2023-11-15.
  33. ↑ "LTAP". milliongenerations.org/LTAP. Retrieved 2023-11-15.
  34. ↑ "Think Forward". www.thinkforward.org.au. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  35. ↑ Network, Action. "Think Forward: Think Forward". actionnetwork.org. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  36. ↑ "Future Design – Discuss Japan". www.japanpolicyforum.jp. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  37. ↑ "Special Series「Future Design: A new policymaking system for future generations」". www.rieti.go.jp. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  38. ↑ Shalev, Ariella (2021-12-15). "Japan's movement of Future Design councils". FDSD. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  39. ↑ "Here come the Time Rebels! Japan's "Future Design" movement shows how to factor future generations into our politics". THE ALTERNATIVE. 2020-10-25. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  40. ↑ Salifou, Alimi (2023-02-20). "Partnership for future generations in Africa". Our Future Agenda. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  41. ↑ "Next Generation Fellows". Our Future Agenda. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  42. ↑ "Our Common Agenda". unfoundation.org. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
  43. ↑ "2022 in Review: Young Leaders Are Designing their Own Futures". unfoundation.org. 2022-12-19. Retrieved 2023-11-10.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.