Intergenerational Fairness Day

Last updated

The Intergenerational Fairness Day (IFD) is observed annually on 16 November as a day dedicated to reflection and public discussion on fairness between present, younger, and future generations. [1] It is coordinated by an international network of non-partisan civil society organisations focused on long-term governance and the rights and interests of future generations.

Contents

The day was first observed in 2023 and initially emerged from efforts to promote international recognition of intergenerational fairness, including advocacy for the establishment of an official United Nations international day related to future generations. While the United Nations observes numerous international days related to human rights, sustainability, youth, and social justice (such as World Children's Day – 20 November, Human Rights Day – 10 December, International Women's Day – 8 March, World Water Day – 22 March, etc.).

Since its inception, the focus of Intergenerational Fairness Day has evolved. While it continues to raise awareness of long-term risks and policy challenges that disproportionately affect younger and future generations, it has increasingly been used as a moment for institutional reflection and democratic engagement, particularly at the European level. This shift has been influenced by broader international developments, including the United Nations Summit of the Future (2024) and the adoption of the Declaration on Future Generations, as well as new governance initiatives within the European Union. [2] [3]

In 2025, Intergenerational Fairness Day coincided with the final session of the European Commission’s Citizens’ Panel on Intergenerational Fairness, during which 150 randomly selected citizens from all 27 EU Member States formally presented 24 policy recommendations to the European Commissioner responsible for Intergenerational Fairness. [4] These recommendations were developed over a three-month deliberative process and are intended to inform the European Union’s first Strategy on Intergenerational Fairness, expected to be published in 2026. The coincidence of the citizens’ handover with Intergenerational Fairness Day has been interpreted by organisers and observers as marking a shift toward the day functioning as a recurring moment of democratic accountability for long-term policymaking within the EU.

Intergenerational Fairness Day addresses a broad range of long-term challenges, including climate change, biodiversity loss, demographic change, public debt, technological transformation, housing affordability, pension sustainability, and the governance implications of artificial intelligence. Activities associated with the day typically include public debates, policy discussions, citizen dialogues, academic events, and media coverage focusing on how present-day decisions affect future generations.

Organisations participating in Intergenerational Fairness Day activities have included groups based in Europe, North America, Africa, Asia, and Australia, as well as networks working on youth participation, sustainability, and future-oriented governance. While the day is not an official public holiday, it has increasingly been used by civil society and policy actors as a reference point for discussions on institutional mechanisms to incorporate long-term considerations into democratic decision-making. [5]

Intergenerational Fairness

Intergenerational fairness is a fundamental principle that holds far-reaching implications for societies and the well-being of both current and future generations. [6] [7] This concept underscores the equitable treatment of individuals of all ages, ensuring that the interests and needs of each generation are taken into consideration, addressing a range of significant societal, ethical, and economic concerns. [7] [8] However, it is often noted that democracy tends to be biased towards the present. [9] [10] Scholars, like Dennis F. Thompson, often describe that due to the political system's focus on achieving immediate results within a single term, the long-term consequences of political decisions are often challenging to determine. [11] [12] [13] It is argued that future generations are not well-represented in the political process, while the percentage of elderly voters continues to increase, leading to a potential imbalance in the representation of different age groups. [14] [15] As a result, long-term challenges that will impact future generations may receive limited political or public attention. [16] [17] See also Intergenerational equity.

Intergenerational Fairness Day emphasizes the importance of policies that take into account society's long-term needs, safeguard the rights of future generations, respect planetary limits, and prevent the deferral of costs without corresponding benefits. [18] This necessitates policies that make long-term investments, address persistent issues effectively, and promote democratic values. [13] Intergenerational equity-based policies aim to tackle issues such as public debt, provision of social safety nets, and investment in infrastructure and education. [19] Neglecting these issues can lead to economic crises that can affect younger generations disproportionately. [20] [21] Equitable distribution of opportunities and resources across generations is essential to ensure fairness for all members of society. [22] Sustainable economic systems, prudent resource management, and environmental stewardship are vital for leaving behind a healthy ecosystem with adequate resources and a stable climate for future generations. [23] Intergenerational fairness aims to reduce social, political, economic, and environmental inequalities to achieve this.

See also

References

  1. "Intergenerational Fairness Day - Milliongenerations". www.milliongenerations.org. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  2. Nations, United. "A Declaration on future Generations - United Nations Summit of the Future". United Nations. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  3. "Glenn Micallef - European Commission". commission.europa.eu. 13 October 2025. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  4. "Citizens' Panel on Intergenerational Fairness - Citizens' Engagement Platform". citizens.ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  5. "The world's first Intergenerational Fairness Day". Generation Squeeze. Retrieved 12 January 2026.
  6. Fleurbaey, Marc (2007). "Intergenerational Fairness". In Roemer, John; Suzumura, Kotaro (eds.). Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 155–175. doi:10.1057/9780230236769_10. ISBN   978-0-230-23676-9.
  7. 1 2 Tremmel, Jörg (2014). A theory of intergenerational justice. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN   978-0-415-84578-6.
  8. Fleurbaey, Marc (2007). "Intergenerational Fairness". In Roemer, John; Suzumura, Kotaro (eds.). Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 155–175. doi:10.1057/9780230236769_10. ISBN   978-0-230-23676-9.
  9. Schmidt, Manfred G. (2019). Demokratietheorien. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-25839-9. ISBN   978-3-658-25838-2.
  10. Kates, Michael (3 September 2015). "Justice, democracy, and future generations" . Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 18 (5): 508–528. doi:10.1080/13698230.2013.861655. ISSN   1369-8230. S2CID   145471590.
  11. Thompson, Dennis F. (March 2010). "Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship" . Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 13 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1080/13698230903326232. ISSN   1369-8230. S2CID   4325465.
  12. Levinson, Daryl J. (January 2011). "Parchments and Politics. The Positive Puzzle of Constitutional Commitment". Harvard Law Review. 124 (3): 657–748.
  13. 1 2 Rose, Michael (2016). "Constitutions, Democratic Self-Determination and the Institutional Empowerment of Future Generations: Mitigating an Aporia". Intergenerational Justice Review. 9 (2): 56–71. doi:10.24357/igjr.9.2.549 (inactive 10 October 2025). SSRN   3795580.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of October 2025 (link)
  14. Wilkoszewski, Harald (13 August 2009). "Age Trajectories of Social Policy Preferences – Support for Intergenerational Transfers from a Demographic Perspective". APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. SSRN   1451738.
  15. Doeleman, Jacobus A.; Sandler, Todd (1998). "The Intergenerational Case of Missing Markets and Missing Voters". Land Economics. 74 (1): 1–15. Bibcode:1998LandE..74....1D. doi:10.2307/3147209. ISSN   0023-7639. JSTOR   3147209.
  16. Gesang, Bernward (2018). "Wie sollte eine Demokratie aussehen, die Nachhaltigkeit kann?". In Mannewitz, Tom (ed.). Die Demokratie und ihre Defekte: Analysen und Reformvorschläge (in German). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. pp. 87–105. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-20848-6_5. ISBN   978-3-658-20848-6.
  17. Lagerspetz, Eerik (1 January 1999). "Rationality and politics in long-term decisions". Biodiversity & Conservation. 8 (1): 149–164. Bibcode:1999BiCon...8..149L. doi:10.1023/A:1008821427812. ISSN   1572-9710. S2CID   27661391.
  18. Tremmel, Jörg (9 October 2012), Eine Theorie der Generationengerechtigkeit (in German), Brill mentis, doi: 10.30965/9783957439437 , ISBN   978-3-95743-943-7 , retrieved 10 November 2023
  19. MacKenzie, Michael Kenneth (September 2013). "Future Publics: Long-Term Thinking and Farsighted Action in Democratic Systems". The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies: The University of British Columbia (Vancouver).
  20. Jacobs, Alan M.; Matthews, J. Scott (2012). "Why Do Citizens Discount the Future? Public Opinion and the Timing of Policy Consequences". British Journal of Political Science. 42 (4): 903–935. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000117. ISSN   0007-1234. JSTOR   23274172.
  21. Glantz, Michael, ed. (1999). Creeping Environmental Problems and Sustainable Development in the Aral Sea Basin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535970. ISBN   978-0-521-62086-4.
  22. Cassell, Mark K. (2011). "Review of Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment". Political Science Quarterly. 126 (4): 694–696. doi:10.1002/j.1538-165X.2011.tb02197.x. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   41502482.
  23. Woodward, Richard T. (August 2000). "Sustainability as Intergenerational Fairness: Efficiency, Uncertainty, and Numerical Methods". American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 82 (3): 581–593. doi:10.1111/0002-9092.00048. hdl: 10.1111/0002-9092.00048 . ISSN   0002-9092. S2CID   56229119.