Invertebrate drift

Last updated

Invertebrate drift is the downstream transport of invertebrate organisms in lotic freshwater systems such as rivers and streams. The term lotic comes from the Latin word lotus, meaning "washing", and is used to describe moving freshwater systems. This is in contrast with lentic coming from the Latin word lentus, meaning slow or motionless that typically describe still or standing waters such as lakes, ponds, and swamps. [1]

Contents

Drift can service freshwater invertebrates by giving them an escape route from predation, or the use of a current to disperse progeny downstream. [2] On occasion, however, invertebrates will inadvertently lose their footing, and drift downstream. For that, invertebrates counter a stream's flow through physical and behavioral adaptations. [3] And just as invertebrates adapted to stabilize themselves in the water column, or use the stream's energy to their advantage, so too have predators adapted to catch invertebrates as they drift. Species of fish, commonly salmonids, catch drifting insects during the peak times after dusk, and before dawn. [4] Fishermen can exploit this relationship using fly fishing techniques and lures that mimic drifting insects to catch these fishes. [5]

Researchers have developed sampling techniques in lotic systems. From it, research as far back as 1928 has collected data on the phenomenon of drift. [6] The study of invertebrate drift has progressed the field of stream ecology. Drift has been documented to impact community structure, benthic production, and the energy flow through trophic levels. [7]

Mechanisms of drift

Types of drift

Invertebrate drift can be categorized by the conditions that caused the drift to occur.

Friction disk. Ventral side of Epeorus species.jpg
Friction disk.

Species associated with drift

Invertebrate species adapt to a stream's current through the organs or appendages that physically attach them to the substrate, or association with large boulders or thick plant growth to buffer the disturbances associated with flow. [9] An example of the former is the family Heptageniidae in the order Ephemeroptera. Larvae within the genus have modified gills forming a friction disc that allows them to cling to the substrate in rapid moving waters. [3] An example of the friction disk can be seen on the image to the right which shows the ventral side of a species within the genus epeorus.

Müller (1954) found that water mites (Hydracarina) and aquatic beetles (Coleoptera) made up a large portion of the benthos population in the stream Skravelbäcken of Sweden, but since they associated with boulders and thick plant growth, they avoid being dislodged by water currents into drift. [9]

Drift-feeding predation

Many predators of common insects and invertebrates found in streams feed off of those found in stream drift. Many of these predators have adapted or have become specialized to feeding on invertebrates found in stream drift. Predators that use this as their main source for food, typically fish, are called drift-feeders.

Sculpin are bottom feeders that look for insects drifting near the substrate Sculpin in St. Mary River.jpg
Sculpin are bottom feeders that look for insects drifting near the substrate

The most common example of drift-feeding predators are stream salmonids, especially trout. These fish catch a lot of their prey during dusk and dawn. This has led to studies concluding that many invertebrates have adapted to drifting at night, where they can avoid predation due to these fish being mainly visual hunters. [4]

Other fish, such as the sculpin, have evolved with highly developed lateral lines, allowing them to have better nocturnal predation skills. As such, sculpins were found to catch a majority of their prey at night, as well as during the day. [4]

Fish predation on invertebrate has been seen to alter prey densities in streams by individual feeding of insects or by effecting insect dispersal behavior. [4]

Avoidance

Common invertebrate species have adapted drifting behaviors to help avoid predation. The biggest example, as mentioned before, is to drift at night. However, invertebrate have adapted to change their drift behavior to avoid predation after receiving other certain signals and indicators. For example, the mayfly Baetis bicaudatis was shown to change its behavior based on odors chemically released in the water system similar to fish predators. [7]

Non-piscine predation

Although fish are the main predators of invertebrates in stream drift, there are others as well, such as birds and large insects. For example, the white-throated dipper Cinclus cinclus, is an aquatic bird that feeds off of invertebrates in stream drift. [10] Another example is the stonefly, which is a large insect that has been found to prey on other small drifting insects, such as the mayfly. [11]

Environmental factors affecting invertebrate drift

Changes to the environment as a result of abiotic factors can lead to both increases and decreases of invertebrate drift. Factors such as a reduction of stream flow can lead to an increase of invertebrate drift, as observed by Minshall and Winger in their 1968 study. [12] They found that as stream flow and the frequency had an inverse relationship over the course of July, August, and September in the Rocky Mountains of Idaho. [12]

Koetsier and Bryan sought to assess the effect of abiotic factors on invertebrate drift in the lower Mississippi river. Just as with Minshall and Winger, they found that there was a negative correlation between stream discharge and frequency of invertebrate drift. [13] According to their 1995 study, river discharge could be attributed to approximately 40% of variation in the taxa of invertebrates which are more prone to drift. [13]

Invertebrate drift is also affected by the day/night cycle. At night invertebrate drift can be up to 10 times higher than during the day. [14] Benke et al. found that all of the invertebrates that they sampled had a consistency to be more active in the drift at night especially during the summer. [14] They found that this pattern of drift happening at night continued all throughout the year, but that the extent of the difference in drift between day and night was not as exaggerated as during the summer. [14] Benke et al. also found that in southern states the invertebrate drift is more abundant and consistent which is largely attributed to the fact that there is not a sharp decline in temperature during winter like happens in more northern states. [14]

Drift research

History of drift research

The concept of drift can be traced back to 1928 where an experiment conducted by P. R. Needham of Cornell University sought to quantify allochthonous animal material in various stream environments. Needham used drift and stop nets to collect available drifting material and organisms and calculated the collection based on the area length of stream reaches. The study served as a proof of concept for use of these methods for future quantitative and qualitative ecological studies of drifting organisms. [6]

After a period of dormancy, there was a resurgence on the research of drift in the 1950s and 1960s. [2] A prominent paper of the time was Müller's 1954 Investigations on the organic drift in North Sweden streams. Müller proposed the term "colonization cycle" after observing the upper stream reaches in Sweden were recolonizing quickly despite their progeny's physical inability to migrate against a current. To counter competition, immature organisms disperse downstream then migrated back upstream as adults to spawn, thus, replenishing populations. [9]

In the early 1960s, research done by Hikaru Tanaka, Thomas F. Walters, and Karl Müller discovered that invertebrate drift followed a distinct diel periodicity. [2] In Walter’ 1962 paper "Diurnal Periodicity in the Drift of Stream Invertebrates", Walters measured the high volume of drifting scuds ( Gammarus limnaeus) over 24 hours within four different months spanning each of the seasons. Uniformly, across August, October, February, and May, there was a notable increase in drift 1 hour after sunset and a notable decrease an hour before sunrise. In August specifically, there was a significant spike in scud volume after sunset reaching numbers of 100-fold of that caught a few hours prior. Walters measured other species caught like mayflies ( Baetis vagans), caddisflies ( Glossosoma intermedium), and water boatman adults ( Hesperocorixa sp.) and they all displayed a similar pattern of diurnal periodicity. Walters hypothesized that the higher drift rates coincided with higher invertebrate activity during the night, and as the invertebrates moved around freely, they were swept downstream by the current. [15]

Sampler with flow meter. Invertebrate drift sampler.jpg
Sampler with flow meter.

Methods of sampling

Use of sampler without a flow meter to capture invertebrates. Insect drift.png
Use of sampler without a flow meter to capture invertebrates.

There are three well used methods for sampling invertebrate drift: samplers with flow meters, samplers without flow meters, and tube samplers. Invertebrate drift is observed to function on 24-hour intervals. [2]

Tube samplers are used to pass stream discharge ending in the air above a filtering net. Therefore, the tube will be extended out of the water allowing water to exit and flow through a net filtering all invertebrates. [18] Advantages to this method is there is a rarity of back flow. [18] Disadvantages to this method involve invertebrates that have the ability to survive in the tube without being transferred through the filter. This can be solved by cleaning the tube after gathering sufficient data. [18]

The efficiency of these methods has been confirmed. Although, there are many factors that control samplers, it is believed that samplers maintain "laminar flow and do not significantly affect the velocity of water at the mouth." [20] These models sample drift at close to maximum efficiency.

Human use of invertebrate drift

Nymph patterns Nymph patterns innovated by Dr Bell of Wrington.jpeg
Nymph patterns

Fly fishing

Fly fishing is a method of angling that uses lures composed of hair, feathers, and synthetic materials that mimics a fly, bug, or other prey items. [21] [22] Using a long rod, typically between 7 and 11 feet (2 to 3.5 meters), the angler snaps the rod back and forth allowing the lure to rest just above the water's surface before flicking back. [21] [23] The method described is referred to as dry-fly fishing as the lure is on or above the water. In contrast, there is wet-fly fishing where the lure sits on or beneath the water's surface. [23] In wet-fly fishing, the angler casts their lure upstream allowing the current to carry the fly, whether submerged or on the surface, downstream to the target trout. [23]

A wet fly-fishing technique known as nymph fishing (or nymphing) is used commonly to catch trout who feed on drifting nymphs in shallow riffles. Anglers take advantage of invertebrate drift and cast their lines with a mimic nymph fly upstream and allow the river's current to carry their submerged lure downstream to where the trout are waiting to catch their prey. [8]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trout</span> Freshwater fish from subfamily Salmoninae

Trout is a generic common name for numerous species of carnivorous freshwater ray-finned fishes belonging to the genera Oncorhynchus, Salmo and Salvelinus, all of which are members of the subfamily Salmoninae in the family Salmonidae. The word trout is also used for some similar-shaped but non-salmonid fish, such as the spotted seatrout/speckled trout.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fly fishing</span> Angling technique

Fly fishing is an angling technique that uses an ultralight-weight lure called an artificial fly, which typically mimics small invertebrates such as flying and aquatic insects to attract and catch fish. Because the mass of the fly lure is insufficient to overcome air resistance, it cannot be launched far using conventional gears and techniques, so specialized tackles are used instead and the casting techniques are significantly different from other forms of angling. It is also very common for the angler to wear waders, carry a hand net, and stand in the water when fishing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mayfly</span> Aquatic insects of the order Ephemeroptera

Mayflies are aquatic insects belonging to the order Ephemeroptera. This order is part of an ancient group of insects termed the Palaeoptera, which also contains dragonflies and damselflies. Over 3,000 species of mayfly are known worldwide, grouped into over 400 genera in 42 families.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brown trout</span> Species of fish

The brown trout is a species of salmonid ray-finned fish and the most widely distributed species of the genus Salmo, endemic to most of Europe, West Asia and parts of North Africa, and has been widely introduced globally as a game fish, even becoming one of the world's worst invasive species outside of its native range.

<i>Thymallus thymallus</i> Species of fish

Thymallus thymallus, the grayling or European grayling, is a species of freshwater fish in the salmon family Salmonidae. It is the only species of the genus Thymallus native to Europe, where it is widespread from the United Kingdom and France to the Ural Mountains in Russia, and Balkans on the south-east, but does not occur in the southern parts of the continent. It was introduced to Morocco in 1948, but it does not appear to have become established there.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hare's Ear</span> Artificial fly fishing lure

The Hare's Ear or Gold Ribbed Hare’s Ear is a traditional artificial fly imitating an aquatic insect larva (nymph) used in fly fishing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caddisfly</span> Order of caddisflies

The caddisflies, or order Trichoptera, are a group of insects with aquatic larvae and terrestrial adults. There are approximately 14,500 described species, most of which can be divided into the suborders Integripalpia and Annulipalpia on the basis of the adult mouthparts. Integripalpian larvae construct a portable casing to protect themselves as they move around looking for food, while annulipalpian larvae make themselves a fixed retreat in which they remain, waiting for food to come to them. The affinities of the small third suborder Spicipalpia are unclear, and molecular analysis suggests it may not be monophyletic. Also called sedge-flies or rail-flies, the adults are small moth-like insects with two pairs of hairy membranous wings. They are closely related to the Lepidoptera which have scales on their wings; the two orders together form the superorder Amphiesmenoptera.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">River ecosystem</span> Type of aquatic ecosystem with flowing freshwater

River ecosystems are flowing waters that drain the landscape, and include the biotic (living) interactions amongst plants, animals and micro-organisms, as well as abiotic (nonliving) physical and chemical interactions of its many parts. River ecosystems are part of larger watershed networks or catchments, where smaller headwater streams drain into mid-size streams, which progressively drain into larger river networks. The major zones in river ecosystems are determined by the river bed's gradient or by the velocity of the current. Faster moving turbulent water typically contains greater concentrations of dissolved oxygen, which supports greater biodiversity than the slow-moving water of pools. These distinctions form the basis for the division of rivers into upland and lowland rivers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Common river galaxias</span> Species of fish

The common river galaxias or Canterbury galaxias is a galaxiid fish of the genus Galaxias, found only in Canterbury, New Zealand.

Ohio currently has 5 rivers that host populations of either rainbow trout, brown trout, or brook trout. These rivers are the Mad River, the Clear Fork River, Clear Creek, the Chagrin River, and the Rocky River.

Dry fly fishing is an angling technique in which the lure is an artificial fly which floats on the surface of the water and does not sink below it. Developed originally for trout fly fishing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pheasant Tail Nymph</span>

The Pheasant Tail nymph or PT Nymph or Sawyer's Pheasant Tail is a popular all purpose nymph imitation used by fly anglers. It imitates a large variety of olive, olive-brown colored aquatic insect larvae that many fish including trout and grayling feed upon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artificial fly</span> Lure used in fly fishing

An artificial fly or fly lure is a type of fishing lure, usually used in the sport of fly fishing. In general, artificial flies are an imitation of aquatic insects that are natural food of the target fish species the fly fishers try to catch. Artificial flies are constructed by fly tying, in which furs, feathers, thread or any of very many other materials are tied onto a fish hook.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ephemerellidae</span> Family of mayflies

Ephemerellidae are known as the spiny crawler mayflies. They are a family of the order Ephemeroptera. There are eight genera consisting of a total 90 species. They are distributed throughout North America as well as the UK. Their habitat is lotic-erosional, they are found in all sizes of flowing streams on different types of substrates where there is reduced flow. They are even found on the shores of lakes and beaches where there is wave action present. They move by swimming and clinging, they are very well camouflaged. Most species have one generation per year. They are mostly collector-gatherers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spin fishing</span> Angling technique where a spinning lure is used to entice the fish to bite

Spin fishing is an angling technique where a spinnerbait, a type of hybrid fishing lure with at least one freely rotating blade, is used to entice the fish to bite. When the line is reeled back, the spinnerbait blades will spin passively with oncoming the water flow, in turn stirring up significant amount of turbulence and noise, which transmit through the water and provoke predatory fish to strike the lure out of their foraging as well as territorial instincts. Spin fishing is used in both freshwater and marine environments.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to fishing:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dusky darter</span> Species of fish

The dusky darter is a species of freshwater ray-finned fish, a darter from the subfamily Etheostomatinae, part of the family Percidae, which also contains the perches, ruffes and pikeperches. It is found in, but not confined to, both large and small rivers, and shallow creeks, in the eastern, southern, and southeastern United States, particularly the Mississippi River drainage system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reach cast</span>

The reach cast is a casting technique used in fly fishing. The reach cast involves casting the fly lure over flowing water, such as a stream, and then just before the fly lands, moving the arm and fly rod in the upstream direction to arrange the fishing line so that it produces less apparent drag in the water. The technique allows the lure to more closely resemble a free-floating insect, resulting in greater chance of it being taken by a fish. Reach casting also allows an experienced caster to pitch curved casts in order to get the lures into difficult places.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquatic-terrestrial subsidies</span>

Energy, nutrients, and contaminants derived from aquatic ecosystems and transferred to terrestrial ecosystems are termed aquatic-terrestrial subsidies or, more simply, aquatic subsidies. Common examples of aquatic subsidies include organisms that move across habitat boundaries and deposit their nutrients as they decompose in terrestrial habitats or are consumed by terrestrial predators, such as spiders, lizards, birds, and bats. Aquatic insects that develop within streams and lakes before emerging as winged adults and moving to terrestrial habitats contribute to aquatic subsidies. Fish removed from aquatic ecosystems by terrestrial predators are another important example. Conversely, the flow of energy and nutrients from terrestrial ecosystems to aquatic ecosystems are considered terrestrial subsidies; both aquatic subsidies and terrestrial subsidies are types of cross-boundary subsidies. Energy and nutrients are derived from outside the ecosystem where they are ultimately consumed.

<i>Ephemera simulans</i> Species of mayfly

Ephemera simulans is a species of mayfly. It is commonly found throughout the United States. The species is used for fly fishing.

References

  1. Marsh, G. Alex; Fairbridge, Rhodes W. (1999), "Lentic and lotic ecosystems", Environmental Geology, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 381–388, doi:10.1007/1-4020-4494-1_204, ISBN   978-1-4020-4494-6 , retrieved 2020-11-26
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Brittain, John E.; Eikeland, Tor Jan (1988). "Invertebrate drift ? A review". Hydrobiologia. 166 (1): 77–93. doi:10.1007/BF00017485. ISSN   0018-8158. S2CID   25205313.
  3. 1 2 McCaffery, W. Patrick (1983). Aquatic Entomology: The Fisherman's and Ecologist's Illustrated Guide to Insects and Their Relatives. Ontario, Canada: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. pp. 106–107. ISBN   0-86720-017-0.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Miyasaka, Hitoshi (1999). "Effects of Drift- and Benthic-Foraging Fish on the Drift Dispersal of Three Species of Mayfly Nymphs in a Japanese Stream". Oecologia. 118 (1): 99–106. Bibcode:1999Oecol.118...99M. doi:10.1007/s004420050707. JSTOR   4222216. PMID   20135165. S2CID   23116365 via JSTOR.
  5. Hafele, Rick. (2006). Nymph-fishing rivers and streams : a biologist's view of taking trout below the surface (1st ed.). Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books. ISBN   0-8117-0169-7. OCLC   61694779.
  6. 1 2 Needham, P. R. (1928). "A Net For the Capture of Stream Drift Organisms". Ecology. 9 (3): 339–342. doi:10.2307/1932372. ISSN   0012-9658. JSTOR   1932372.
  7. 1 2 Neman, Sean (Feb 2016). "Causes and consequences of invertebrate drift in running waters: from individuals to populations and trophic fluxes". Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 76 (8): 1292–1305. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2015-0363 . hdl: 1807/72134 .
  8. 1 2 Hafele, Rick (2006). Nymph Fishing Rivers and Streams: A Biologist's View of Taking Trout Below the Surface. Stackpole Books. ISBN   978-0-8117-0169-3.
  9. 1 2 3 Müller, K (1954). "Investigations on the Organic Drift in North Swedish Streams". Institute of Freshwater Research, Drottningholm. Report No 35: 136–151. hdl:2077/48733 via GUPEA.
  10. Jenkins, R. K. B.; Ormerod, S. J. (1996). "The influence of a river bird, the dipper (Cinclus cinclus), on the behaviour and drift of its invertebrate prey". Freshwater Biology. 35 (1): 45–56. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1996.d01-442.x. ISSN   1365-2427.
  11. Wooster, David; Sih, Andrew (1995). "A Review of the Drift and Activity Responses of Stream Prey to Predator Presence". Oikos. 73 (1): 3–8. doi:10.2307/3545718. ISSN   0030-1299. JSTOR   3545718.
  12. 1 2 Minshall, G. Wayne; Winger, Parley V. (1968). "The Effect of Reduction in Stream Flow on Invertebrate Drift". Ecology. 49 (3): 580–582. doi:10.2307/1934133. JSTOR   1934133.
  13. 1 2 Koetsier, Peter; Bryan, C. Frederick (1995). "Effects of Abiotic Factors on Macroinvertebrate Drift in the Lower Mississippi River, Louisiana". American Midland Naturalist. 134 (1): 63. doi:10.2307/2426483. JSTOR   2426483.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Benke, Arthur; Hunter, Robert; Parrish, Fred (1986). "Invertebrate Drift Dynamics in a Subtropical Blackwater River". Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 5 (3): 173–190. doi:10.2307/1467705. JSTOR   1467705. S2CID   85402109 via JSTOR.
  15. Waters, Thomas F. (1962). "Diurnal Periodicity in the Drift of Stream Invertebrates". Ecology. 43 (2): 316–320. doi:10.2307/1931988. ISSN   0012-9658. JSTOR   1931988. S2CID   86494484.
  16. "Preliminary geologic map of the Glen Canyon Dam area, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Coconino County, Arizona, and Kane and San Juan Counties, Utah". 2012. doi:10.34191/ofr-607.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  17. "Water resources of King County, Washington". 1968. doi: 10.3133/wsp1852 .{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Elliot, J.M. (1970). "Methods of sampling invertebrate drift in running water". International Journal of Limnology. 6 (2): 133–159. doi: 10.1051/limn/1970017 via edp sciences.
  19. Hill, Brian H.; Lazorchak, James M.; McCormick, Frank H.; Willingham, W.Thomas (1997). "The effects of elevated metals on benthic community metabolism in a rocky mountain stream". Environmental Pollution. 95 (2): 183–190. doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(96)00123-6. ISSN   0269-7491. PMID   15093458.
  20. Field‐dodgson, M. S. (1984). "A simple and efficient drift sampler". New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 19 (2): 167–172. doi: 10.1080/00288330.1985.9516083 . ISSN   0028-8330.
  21. 1 2 "Fly-fishing | sport". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-11-27.
  22. Merwin, John (1996). Fly Fishing: A Trailside Guide. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN   978-0-393-31476-2.
  23. 1 2 3 Southard, Charles Zibeon (1914). Trout Fly-fishing in America. Dutton.