Lateral line

Last updated

Oblique view of a goldfish (Carassius auratus), showing pored scales of the lateral line system Lateral line 01.JPG
Oblique view of a goldfish (Carassius auratus), showing pored scales of the lateral line system

The lateral line, also called the lateral line organ (LLO), is a system of sensory organs found in fish, used to detect movement, vibration, and pressure gradients in the surrounding water. The sensory ability is achieved via modified epithelial cells, known as hair cells, which respond to displacement caused by motion and transduce these signals into electrical impulses via excitatory synapses. Lateral lines play an important role in schooling behavior, predation, and orientation.

Contents

Early in the evolution of fish, some of the sensory organs of the lateral line were modified to function as the electroreceptors called ampullae of Lorenzini. The lateral line system is ancient and basal to the vertebrate clade, as it is found in fishes that diverged over 400 million years ago.

Function

The lateral line system allows the detection of movement, vibration, and pressure gradients in the water surrounding an animal. It plays an essential role in orientation, predation, and fish schooling by providing spatial awareness and the ability to navigate in the environment. [1] Analysis has shown that the lateral line system should be an effective passive sensing system able to discriminate between submerged obstacles by their shape. [2] [3] The lateral line allows fish to navigate and hunt in water with poor visibility. [4]

The lateral line system enables predatory fishes to detect vibrations made by their prey, and to orient towards the source to begin predatory action. [5] Blinded predatory fishes remain able to hunt, but not when lateral line function is inhibited by cobalt ions. [6]

The lateral line plays a role in fish schooling. Blinded Pollachius virens were able to integrate into a school, whereas fish with severed lateral lines could not. [7] It may have evolved further to allow fish to forage in dark caves. In Mexican blind cave fish, Astyanax mexicanus , neuromasts in and around the orbit of the eye are bigger and around twice as sensitive as those of surface-living fish. [8]

One function of schooling may be to confuse the lateral line of predatory fishes. A single prey fish creates a simple particle velocity pattern, whereas the pressure gradients of many closely swimming (schooling) prey fish overlap, creating a complex pattern. This makes it difficult for predatory fishes to identify individual prey through lateral line perception. [9]

Anatomy

The lateral line system consists of canals that run along a fish's body, connecting rows of openings (pores) through the skin and scales to the water outside the body. Small sense organs, neuromasts (inset), are positioned both at intervals along the canals, and on the surface of the body. Each hair cell contains a bundle of sensory hairs. LateralLine Organ.jpg
The lateral line system consists of canals that run along a fish's body, connecting rows of openings (pores) through the skin and scales to the water outside the body. Small sense organs, neuromasts (inset), are positioned both at intervals along the canals, and on the surface of the body. Each hair cell contains a bundle of sensory hairs.
A three-spined stickleback with stained neuromasts Gasterosteus aculeatus with stained neuromasts.png
A three-spined stickleback with stained neuromasts

Lateral lines are usually visible as faint lines of pores running along each side of a fish's body. [1] The functional units of the lateral line are the neuromasts, discrete mechanoreceptive organs that sense movement in water. There are two main varieties: canal neuromasts and superficial neuromasts. Superficial neuromasts are on the surface of the body, while canal neuromasts are along the lateral lines in subdermal, fluid-filled canals. Each neuromast consists of receptive hair cells whose tips are covered by a flexible jellylike cupula. Hair cells typically possess both glutamatergic afferent connections and cholinergic efferent connections. [11] [12] The receptive hair cells are modified epithelial cells; they typically possess bundles of 40-50 microvilli "hairs" which function as the mechanoreceptors. [12] Within each bundle, the hairs are organized in a rough "staircase" from shortest to longest. [13]

Signal transduction

Lateral line rate coding indicates direction and sometimes strength of stimulus. One neuromast shown. Lateral line rate coding.svg
Lateral line rate coding indicates direction and sometimes strength of stimulus. One neuromast shown.

The hair cells are stimulated by the deflection of their hair bundles in the direction of the tallest "hairs" or stereocilia. The deflection allows cations to enter through a mechanically gated channel, causing depolarization or hyperpolarization of the hair cell. Depolarization opens Cav1.3 calcium channels in the basolateral membrane. [14]

Hair cells use a system of transduction with rate coding to transmit the directionality of a stimulus. The hair cells produce a constant, tonic rate of firing. As mechanical motion is transmitted through water to the neuromast, the cupula bends and is displaced according to the strength of the stimulus. This results in a shift in the cell's ionic permeability. Deflection towards the longest hair results in depolarization of the hair cell, increased neurotransmitter release at the excitatory afferent synapse, and a higher rate of signal transduction. Deflection towards the shorter hair has the opposite effect, hyperpolarizing the hair cell and producing a decreased rate of neurotransmitter release. These electrical impulses are then transmitted along afferent lateral neurons to the brain. [12]

While both varieties of neuromasts utilize this method of transduction, their specialized organization gives them different mechanoreceptive capacities. Superficial organs are exposed more directly to the external environment. The organization of the bundles within their organs is seemingly haphazard, incorporating various shapes and sizes of microvilli within bundles. This suggests coarse but wide-ranging detection. [13] In contrast, the structure of canal organs allow canal neuromasts more sophisticated mechanoreception, such as of pressure differentials. As current moves across the pores, a pressure differential is created, inducing a flow in the canal fluid. This moves the cupulae of the neuromasts in the canal, resulting in a deflection of the hairs in the direction of the flow. [15]

Electrophysiology

The mechanoreceptive hair cells of the lateral line structure are integrated into more complex circuits through their afferent and efferent connections. The synapses that directly participate in the transduction of mechanical information are excitatory afferent connections that utilize glutamate. [16] Species vary in their neuromast and afferent connections, providing differing mechanoreceptive properties. For instance, the superficial neuromasts of the midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus, are sensitive to specific stimulation frequencies. [17] One variety is attuned to collect information about acceleration, at stimulation frequencies between 30 and 200 Hz. The other type obtains information about velocity, and is most receptive to stimulation below 30 Hz. [17]

The motion detection system in fish works despite "noise" created by the fish itself. The brain copies the efferent commands it gives to the swimming muscles to the lateral line, effectively suppressing swimming noise and revealing small signals from the environment, such as from prey. Lateral line circuits.svg
The motion detection system in fish works despite "noise" created by the fish itself. The brain copies the efferent commands it gives to the swimming muscles to the lateral line, effectively suppressing swimming noise and revealing small signals from the environment, such as from prey.

The efferent synapses to hair cells are inhibitory and use acetylcholine as a transmitter. They are crucial participants in a corollary discharge system designed to limit self-generated interference. When a fish moves, it creates disturbances in the water that could be detected by the lateral line system, potentially interfering with the detection of other biologically relevant signals. To prevent this, an efferent signal is sent to the hair cell upon motor action, resulting in inhibition which counteracts the excitation resulting from reception of the self-generated stimulation. This allows the fish to detect external stimuli without interference from its own movements. [18]

Signals from the hair cells are transmitted along lateral neurons to the brain. The area where these signals most often terminate is the medial octavolateralis nucleus (MON), which probably processes and integrates mechanoreceptive information. [19] The deep MON contains distinct layers of basilar and non-basilar crest cells, suggesting computational pathways analogous to the electrosensory lateral line lobe of electric fish. The MON is likely involved in the integration of excitatory and inhibitory parallel circuits to interpret mechanoreceptive information. [20]

Evolution

The electroreceptive organs called ampullae of Lorenzini (red dots), illustrated here on the head of a shark, evolved from the mechanosensory lateral line organs (gray lines) of the last common ancestor of vertebrates. Electroreceptors in a sharks head.svg
The electroreceptive organs called ampullae of Lorenzini (red dots), illustrated here on the head of a shark, evolved from the mechanosensory lateral line organs (gray lines) of the last common ancestor of vertebrates.

The use of mechanosensitive hairs is homologous to the functioning of hair cells in the auditory and vestibular systems, indicating a close link between these systems. [12] Due to many overlapping functions and their great similarity in ultrastructure and development, the lateral line system and the inner ear of fish are often grouped together as the octavolateralis system (OLS). [23] Here, the lateral line system detects particle velocities and accelerations with frequencies below 100 Hz. These low frequencies create large wavelengths, which induce strong particle accelerations in the near field of swimming fish that do not radiate into the far field as acoustic waves due to an acoustic short circuit. The auditory system detects pressure fluctuations with frequencies above 100 Hz that propagate to the far field as waves. [24]

The lateral line system is ancient and basal to the vertebrate clade; it is found in groups of fishes that diverged over 400 million years ago, including the lampreys, cartilaginous fishes, and bony fishes. [25] [26] Most amphibian larvae and some fully aquatic adult amphibians possess mechanosensitive systems comparable to the lateral line. [27] The terrestrial tetrapods have secondarily lost their lateral line organs, which are ineffective when not submerged. [26]

The electroreceptive organs, called ampullae of Lorenzini, appearing as pits in the skin of sharks and some other fishes, evolved from the lateral line organ. [21] Passive electroreception using ampullae is an ancestral trait in the vertebrates, meaning that it was present in their last common ancestor. [22]

Vertebrates
 Lateral line 

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motor neuron</span> Nerve cell sending impulse to muscle

A motor neuron is a neuron whose cell body is located in the motor cortex, brainstem or the spinal cord, and whose axon (fiber) projects to the spinal cord or outside of the spinal cord to directly or indirectly control effector organs, mainly muscles and glands. There are two types of motor neuron – upper motor neurons and lower motor neurons. Axons from upper motor neurons synapse onto interneurons in the spinal cord and occasionally directly onto lower motor neurons. The axons from the lower motor neurons are efferent nerve fibers that carry signals from the spinal cord to the effectors. Types of lower motor neurons are alpha motor neurons, beta motor neurons, and gamma motor neurons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parasympathetic nervous system</span> Division of the autonomic nervous system

The parasympathetic nervous system (PSNS) is one of the three divisions of the autonomic nervous system, the others being the sympathetic nervous system and the enteric nervous system. The enteric nervous system is sometimes considered part of the autonomic nervous system, and sometimes considered an independent system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vestibulocochlear nerve</span> Cranial nerve VIII, for hearing and balance

The vestibulocochlear nerve or auditory vestibular nerve, also known as the eighth cranial nerve, cranial nerve VIII, or simply CN VIII, is a cranial nerve that transmits sound and equilibrium (balance) information from the inner ear to the brain. Through olivocochlear fibers, it also transmits motor and modulatory information from the superior olivary complex in the brainstem to the cochlea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Olfactory bulb</span> Neural structure

The olfactory bulb is a neural structure of the vertebrate forebrain involved in olfaction, the sense of smell. It sends olfactory information to be further processed in the amygdala, the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the hippocampus where it plays a role in emotion, memory and learning. The bulb is divided into two distinct structures: the main olfactory bulb and the accessory olfactory bulb. The main olfactory bulb connects to the amygdala via the piriform cortex of the primary olfactory cortex and directly projects from the main olfactory bulb to specific amygdala areas. The accessory olfactory bulb resides on the dorsal-posterior region of the main olfactory bulb and forms a parallel pathway. Destruction of the olfactory bulb results in ipsilateral anosmia, while irritative lesions of the uncus can result in olfactory and gustatory hallucinations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stimulus (physiology)</span> Detectable change in the internal or external surroundings

In physiology, a stimulus is a detectable change in the physical or chemical structure of an organism's internal or external environment. The ability of an organism or organ to detect external stimuli, so that an appropriate reaction can be made, is called sensitivity (excitability). Sensory receptors can receive information from outside the body, as in touch receptors found in the skin or light receptors in the eye, as well as from inside the body, as in chemoreceptors and mechanoreceptors. When a stimulus is detected by a sensory receptor, it can elicit a reflex via stimulus transduction. An internal stimulus is often the first component of a homeostatic control system. External stimuli are capable of producing systemic responses throughout the body, as in the fight-or-flight response. In order for a stimulus to be detected with high probability, its level of strength must exceed the absolute threshold; if a signal does reach threshold, the information is transmitted to the central nervous system (CNS), where it is integrated and a decision on how to react is made. Although stimuli commonly cause the body to respond, it is the CNS that finally determines whether a signal causes a reaction or not.

A mechanoreceptor, also called mechanoceptor, is a sensory receptor that responds to mechanical pressure or distortion. Mechanoreceptors are innervated by sensory neurons that convert mechanical pressure into electrical signals that, in animals, are sent to the central nervous system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Auditory system</span> Sensory system used for hearing

The auditory system is the sensory system for the sense of hearing. It includes both the sensory organs and the auditory parts of the sensory system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hair cell</span> Auditory sensory receptor nerve cells

Hair cells are the sensory receptors of both the auditory system and the vestibular system in the ears of all vertebrates, and in the lateral line organ of fishes. Through mechanotransduction, hair cells detect movement in their environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ampullae of Lorenzini</span> Sensory organs in some fish that detect electrical fields

Ampullae of Lorenzini are electroreceptors, sense organs able to detect electric fields. They form a network of mucus-filled pores in the skin of cartilaginous fish and of basal bony fishes such as reedfish, sturgeon, and lungfish. They are associated with and evolved from the mechanosensory lateral line organs of early vertebrates. Most bony fishes and terrestrial vertebrates have lost their ampullae of Lorenzini.

Merkel nerve endings are mechanoreceptors, a type of sensory receptor, that are found in the basal epidermis and hair follicles. They are nerve endings and provide information on mechanical pressure, position, and deep static touch features, such as shapes and edges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cochlear nucleus</span> Two cranial nerve nuclei of the human brainstem

The cochlear nucleus (CN) or cochlear nuclear complex comprises two cranial nerve nuclei in the human brainstem, the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) and the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). The ventral cochlear nucleus is unlayered whereas the dorsal cochlear nucleus is layered. Auditory nerve fibers, fibers that travel through the auditory nerve carry information from the inner ear, the cochlea, on the same side of the head, to the nerve root in the ventral cochlear nucleus. At the nerve root the fibers branch to innervate the ventral cochlear nucleus and the deep layer of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. All acoustic information thus enters the brain through the cochlear nuclei, where the processing of acoustic information begins. The outputs from the cochlear nuclei are received in higher regions of the auditory brainstem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kinocilium</span> Sensory hair in the inner ear

A kinocilium is a special type of cilium on the apex of hair cells located in the sensory epithelium of the vertebrate inner ear. Contrasting with stereocilia, which are numerous, there is only one kinocilium on each hair cell. The kinocilium can be identified by its apical position as well as its enlarged tip.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bipolar neuron</span> Neuron with only one axon and one dendrite

A bipolar neuron, or bipolar cell, is a type of neuron characterized by having both an axon and a dendrite extending from the soma in opposite directions. These neurons are predominantly found in the retina and olfactory system. The embryological period encompassing weeks seven through eight marks the commencement of bipolar neuron development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mesencephalic nucleus of trigeminal nerve</span>

The mesencephalic nucleus of trigeminal nerve is one of the sensory nuclei of the trigeminal nerve. It is located in the brainstem. It receives proprioceptive sensory information from the muscles of mastication and other muscles of the head and neck. It is involved in processing information about the position of the jaw/teeth. It is functionally responsible for preventing excessive biting that may damage the dentition, regulating tooth pain perception, and mediating the jaw jerk reflex.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jamming avoidance response</span> Behavior performed by weakly electric fish to prevent jamming of their sense of electroreception

The jamming avoidance response is a behavior of some species of weakly electric fish. It occurs when two electric fish with wave discharges meet – if their discharge frequencies are very similar, each fish shifts its discharge frequency to increase the difference between the two. By doing this, both fish prevent jamming of their sense of electroreception.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hydrodynamic reception</span> Ability of an organism to sense water movements

In animal physiology, hydrodynamic reception refers to the ability of some animals to sense water movements generated by biotic or abiotic sources. This form of mechanoreception is useful for orientation, hunting, predator avoidance, and schooling. Frequent encounters with conditions of low visibility can prevent vision from being a reliable information source for navigation and sensing objects or organisms in the environment. Sensing water movements is one resolution to this problem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surface wave detection by animals</span>

Surface wave detection by animals is the process by which animals, such as surface-feeding fish are able to sense and localize prey and other objects on the surface of a body of water by analyzing features of the ripples generated by objects' movement at the surface. Features analyzed include waveform properties such as frequency, change in frequency, and amplitude, and the curvature of the wavefront. A number of different species are proficient in surface wave detection, including some aquatic insects and toads, though most research is done on the topminnow/surface killifish Aplocheilus lineatus. The fish and other animals with this ability spend large amounts of time near the water surface, some just to feed and others their entire lives.

Most fish possess highly developed sense organs. Nearly all daylight fish have colour vision that is at least as good as a human's. Many fish also have chemoreceptors that are responsible for extraordinary senses of taste and smell. Although they have ears, many fish may not hear very well. Most fish have sensitive receptors that form the lateral line system, which detects gentle currents and vibrations, and senses the motion of nearby fish and prey. Sharks can sense frequencies in the range of 25 to 50 Hz through their lateral line.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spinal interneuron</span> Interneuron relaying signals between sensory and motor neurons in the spinal cord

A spinal interneuron, found in the spinal cord, relays signals between (afferent) sensory neurons, and (efferent) motor neurons. Different classes of spinal interneurons are involved in the process of sensory-motor integration. Most interneurons are found in the grey column, a region of grey matter in the spinal cord.

An Artificial Lateral Line (ALL) is a biomimetic lateral line system. A lateral line is a system of sensory organs in aquatic animals such as fish, that serves to detect movement, vibration, and pressure gradients in their environment. An artificial lateral line is an artificial biomimetic array of distinct mechanosensory transducers that, similarly, permits the formation of a spatial-temporal image of the sources in immediate vicinity based on hydrodynamic signatures; the purpose is to assist in obstacle avoidance and object tracking. The biomimetic lateral line system has the potential to improve navigation in underwater vehicles when vision is partially or fully compromised. Underwater navigation is challenging due to the rapid attenuation of radio frequency and Global Positioning System signals. In addition, ALL systems can overcome some of the drawbacks in traditional localization techniques like SONAR and optical imaging.

References

  1. 1 2 Bleckmann, Horst; Zelick, Randy (2009-03-01). "Lateral line system of fish". Integrative Zoology . 4 (1): 13–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2008.00131.x . PMID   21392273.
  2. Bouffanais, Roland; Weymouth, Gabriel D.; Yue, Dick K. P. (2 June 2010). "Hydrodynamic object recognition using pressure sensing" (PDF). Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 467 (2125): 19–38. doi:10.1098/rspa.2010.0095. S2CID   233793.
  3. Lakkam, Sreetej; Balamurali, B. T.; Bouffanais, Roland (2 August 2019). "Hydrodynamic object identification with artificial neural models". Scientific Reports . 9 (1): 11242. arXiv: 1903.00828 . Bibcode:2019NatSR...911242L. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47747-8 . PMC   6677828 . PMID   31375742.
  4. Coombs, Sheryl; Braun, Christopher B. (2003). "Information Processing by the Lateral Line System". In Collin, Shaun P.; Marshall, N. Justin (eds.). Sensory Processing in Aquatic Environments. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 122–138. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-22628-6_7. ISBN   978-0-387-95527-8.
  5. Coombs, S. I.; Braun, C. B.; Donovan, B. (2001). "The orienting response of Lake Michigan mottled sculpin is mediated by canal neuromasts". Journal of Experimental Biology. 204 (2): 337–348. doi:10.1242/jeb.204.2.337. PMID   11136619.
  6. Karlsen, H. E.; Sand, O. (1987). "Selective and Reversible Blocking of the Lateral Line in Freshwater Fish". The Journal of Experimental Biology . 133 (1): 249–262. doi: 10.1242/jeb.133.1.249 .
  7. Pitcher, T.; Partridge, B.; Wardle, C. (1976). "A blind fish can school". Science. 194 (4268): 963–965. Bibcode:1976Sci...194..963P. doi:10.1126/science.982056. PMID   982056.
  8. Yoshizawa, Masato; Jeffery, William; Van Netten, Sietse; McHenry, Matthew (2014). "The sensitivity of lateral line receptors and their role in the behavior of Mexican blind cavefish, Astyanax mexicanus". The Journal of Experimental Biology . 217 (6): 886–895. doi:10.1242/jeb.094599. PMC   3951362 . PMID   24265419.
  9. Larsson, M. (2009). "Possible functions of the octavolateralis system in fish schooling". Fish and Fisheries. 10 (3): 344–355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2009.00330.x.
  10. Wark, Abigail R.; Mills, Margaret G.; Dang, Lam-Ha; et al. (2012). "Genetic Architecture of Variation in the Lateral Line Sensory System of Threespine Sticklebacks". G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2 (9): 1047–1056. doi:10.1534/g3.112.003079. PMC   3429919 . PMID   22973542.
  11. Russell, I. J. (1971). "The Pharmacology of Efferent Synapses in the Lateral-Line System of Xenopus Laevis". Journal of Experimental Biology. 54 (3): 643–659. doi:10.1242/jeb.54.3.643. PMID   4326222.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Flock, Å. (1967). "Ultrastructure and function in the lateral line organs". In P. Cahn (ed.). Lateral Line Detectors; proceedings of a conference held at Yeshiva University, New York, April 16-18, 1966. Indiana University Press. pp. 163–197.
  13. 1 2 Peach, M. B.; Rouse, G. W. (2000). "The Morphology of the Pit Organs and Lateral Line Canal Neuromasts of Mustelus Antarcticus (Chondrichthyes: Triakidae)". Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 80 (1): 155–162. Bibcode:2000JMBUK..80..155P. doi:10.1017/s0025315499001678. S2CID   85963954.
  14. Baker, Clare (June 11, 2018). "Insights into Electroreceptor Development and Evolution from Molecular Comparisons with Hair Cells". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 58 (2): 329–340. doi:10.1093/icb/icy037. PMC   6927855 . PMID   29846597.
  15. Kuiper, J. W. (1967). "Frequency Characteristics and Functional Significance of the Lateral Line Organ". In P. Cahn (ed.). Lateral Line Detectors; proceedings of a conference held at Yeshiva University, New York, April 16-18, 1966. Indiana University Press. pp. 105–121.
  16. Flock, A.; Lam, D. M. K. (1974). "Neurotransmitter synthesis in inner ear and lateral line sense organs". Nature . 249 (5453): 142–144. Bibcode:1974Natur.249..142F. doi:10.1038/249142a0. PMID   4151611. S2CID   275004.
  17. 1 2 Weeg, M. S.; Bass, A. H. (2002). "Frequency Response Properties of Lateral Line Superficial Neuromasts in a Vocal Fish, With Evidence for Acoustic Sensitivity". Journal of Neurophysiology . 88 (3): 1252–1262. doi:10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1252. PMID   12205146.
  18. 1 2 Montgomery, J. C.; Bodznick, D. (1994). "An adaptive filter that cancels self-induced noise in the electrosensory and lateral line mechanosensory systems of fish". Neuroscience Letters . 174 (2): 145–148. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(94)90007-8. PMID   7970170. S2CID   15709516.
  19. Maruska, K. P.; Tricas, T. C. (2009). "Central projections of octavolateralis nerves in the brain of a soniferous damselfish (Abudefduf abdominalis)". The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 512 (5): 628–650. doi:10.1002/cne.21923. PMID   19048640. S2CID   13604689.
  20. Valera; Markov; Bijari; Randlett; Asgharsharghi; Baudoin; Ascoli; Portugues; Lopez-Schier (2021). "A neuronal blueprint for directional mechanosensation in larval zebrafish". Current Biology . 31 (7): 1463–1475. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.045. PMC   8044000 . PMID   33545047.
  21. 1 2 King, Benedict; Hu, Yuzhi; Long, John A. (11 February 2018). "Electroreception in early vertebrates: survey, evidence and new information". Palaeontology . 61 (3): 325–358. Bibcode:2018Palgy..61..325K. doi: 10.1111/pala.12346 .
  22. 1 2 Bullock, T. H.; Bodznick, D. A.; Northcutt, R. G. (1983). "The phylogenetic distribution of electroreception: Evidence for convergent evolution of a primitive vertebrate sense modality" (PDF). Brain Research Reviews . 6 (1): 25–46. doi:10.1016/0165-0173(83)90003-6. hdl: 2027.42/25137 . PMID   6616267. S2CID   15603518.
  23. Larsson, M. (2012). "Why do fish school?". Current Zoology. 58 (1): 116–128. doi: 10.1093/czoolo/58.1.116 .
  24. Ziemer, Tim (2020). "Biology of the Auditory System". Psychoacoustic Music Sound Field Synthesis. Current Research in Systematic Musicology. Vol. 7. Cham: Springer. pp. 45–64. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23033-3_3. ISBN   978-3-030-23033-3. S2CID   201209634.
  25. Webb, J. (2011). "Hearing and Lateral Line: Lateral Line Structure". Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology. Elsevier. pp. 336–346. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374553-8.00010-1. ISBN   9780080923239.
  26. 1 2 "The origin of tetrapods". University of California Museum of Paleontology Berkeley. 28 April 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2023.
  27. Budelmann, Bernd U.; Bleckmann, Horst (1988). "A lateral line analogue in cephalopods: Water waves generate microphonic potentials in the epidermal head lines of Sepia and Lolliguncula". Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 164 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1007/BF00612711. PMID   3236259. S2CID   8834051.

Further reading

See also