Last updated

Temporal range: Ludfordian-Present 425–0  Ma
[1] Possible Ordovician record [2]
Clockwise from top left: spiny dogfish, Australian angelshark, whale shark, great white shark, horn shark, frilled shark, scalloped hammerhead and Japanese sawshark representing the orders Squaliformes, Squatiniformes, Orectolobiformes, Lamniformes, Heterodontiformes, Hexanchiformes, Carcharhiniformes and Pristiophoriformes respectively.
Scientific classification Red Pencil Icon.png
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Chondrichthyes
Subclass: Elasmobranchii
Infraclass: Euselachii
Superorder: Selachimorpha

Xenacanthida (Xenacantiformes) Elegestolepis


† = extinct

Sharks are a group of elasmobranch fish characterized by a cartilaginous skeleton, five to seven gill slits on the sides of the head, and pectoral fins that are not fused to the head. Modern sharks are classified within the clade Selachimorpha (or Selachii) and are the sister group to the rays. However, the term "shark" has also been used for extinct members of the subclass Elasmobranchii outside the Selachimorpha, such as Cladoselache and Xenacanthus , as well as other Chondrichthyes such as the holocephalid eugenedontidans.

Under this broader definition, the earliest known sharks date back to more than 420 million years ago. [3] Acanthodians are often referred to as "spiny sharks"; though they are not part of Chondrichthyes proper, they are a paraphyletic assemblage leading to cartilaginous fish as a whole. Since then, sharks have diversified into over 500 species. They range in size from the small dwarf lanternshark (Etmopterus perryi), a deep sea species of only 17 centimetres (6.7 in) in length, to the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), the largest fish in the world, which reaches approximately 12 metres (40 ft) in length. [4] Sharks are found in all seas and are common to depths of 2,000 metres (6,600 ft). They generally do not live in freshwater although there are a few known exceptions, such as the bull shark and the river shark, which can be found in both seawater and freshwater. [5] Sharks have a covering of dermal denticles that protects their skin from damage and parasites in addition to improving their fluid dynamics. They have numerous sets of replaceable teeth. [6]

Well-known species such as the tiger shark, blue shark, great white shark, mako shark, thresher shark, and hammerhead shark are apex predators—organisms at the top of their underwater food chain. Sharks are caught by humans for shark meat or shark fin soup. Many shark populations are threatened by human activities. Since 1970, shark populations have been reduced by 71%, mostly from overfishing. [7]


Until the 16th century, [8] sharks were known to mariners as "sea dogs". [9] This is still evidential in several species termed "dogfish," or the porbeagle.

The etymology of the word "shark" is uncertain, the most likely etymology states that the original sense of the word was that of "predator, one who preys on others" from the Dutch schurk, meaning "villain, scoundrel" (cf. card shark, loan shark, etc.), which was later applied to the fish due to its predatory behaviour. [10]

A now disproven[ original research? ] theory is that it derives from the Yucatec Maya word xok (pronounced  [ʃok] ), meaning "fish". [11] Evidence for this etymology came from the Oxford English Dictionary, which notes shark first came into use after Sir John Hawkins' sailors exhibited one in London in 1569 and posted "sharke" to refer to the large sharks of the Caribbean Sea. However, the Middle English Dictionary records an isolated occurrence of the word shark (referring to a sea fish) in a letter written by Thomas Beckington in 1442, which rules out a New World etymology. [12] [ original research? ]

Evolutionary history

Fossil shark tooth (size over 9 cm or 3.5 inches) with crown, shoulder, root and root lobe +Fossiler Haifischzahn - Grosse uber 9 cm - mit Krone - Schulter - Wurzel und Wurzellappen.jpg
Fossil shark tooth (size over 9 cm or 3.5 inches) with crown, shoulder, root and root lobe
A collection of Cretaceous shark teeth CretaceousSharkTeeth061812.JPG
A collection of Cretaceous shark teeth

Fossil record

Evidence for the existence of sharks dates from the Ordovician period, 450–420 million years ago, before land vertebrates existed and before a variety of plants had colonized the continents. [3] Only scales have been recovered from the first sharks and not all paleontologists agree that these are from true sharks, suspecting that these scales are actually those of thelodont agnathans. [13] The oldest generally accepted shark scales are from about 420 million years ago, in the Silurian period. [13] The first sharks looked very different from modern sharks. [14] At this time the most common shark tooth is the cladodont, a style of thin tooth with three tines like a trident, apparently to help catch fish. The majority of modern sharks can be traced back to around 100 million years ago. [15] Most fossils are of teeth, often in large numbers. Partial skeletons and even complete fossilized remains have been discovered. Estimates suggest that sharks grow tens of thousands of teeth over a lifetime, which explains the abundant fossils. The teeth consist of easily fossilized calcium phosphate, an apatite. When a shark dies, the decomposing skeleton breaks up, scattering the apatite prisms. Preservation requires rapid burial in bottom sediments.

Among the most ancient and primitive sharks is Cladoselache , from about 370 million years ago, [14] which has been found within Paleozoic strata in Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee. At that point in Earth's history these rocks made up the soft bottom sediments of a large, shallow ocean, which stretched across much of North America. Cladoselache was only about 1 metre (3.3 ft) long with stiff triangular fins and slender jaws. [14] Its teeth had several pointed cusps, which wore down from use. From the small number of teeth found together, it is most likely that Cladoselache did not replace its teeth as regularly as modern sharks. Its caudal fins had a similar shape to the great white sharks and the pelagic shortfin and longfin makos. The presence of whole fish arranged tail-first in their stomachs suggest that they were fast swimmers with great agility.

Most fossil sharks from about 300 to 150 million years ago can be assigned to one of two groups. The Xenacanthida was almost exclusive to freshwater environments. [16] [17] By the time this group became extinct about 220 million years ago, they had spread worldwide. The other group, the hybodonts, appeared about 320 million years ago and lived mostly in the oceans, but also in freshwater.[ citation needed ] The results of a 2014 study of the gill structure of an unusually well preserved 325-million-year-old fossil suggested that sharks are not "living fossils", but rather have evolved more extensively than previously thought over the hundreds of millions of years they have been around. [18]

Megalodon (top two, estimated maximum and conservative sizes) with the whale shark, great white shark, and a human for scale Megalodon scale.svg
Megalodon (top two, estimated maximum and conservative sizes) with the whale shark, great white shark, and a human for scale

Modern sharks began to appear about 100 million years ago. [15] Fossil mackerel shark teeth date to the Early Cretaceous. One of the most recently evolved families is the hammerhead shark (family Sphyrnidae), which emerged in the Eocene. [19] The oldest white shark teeth date from 60 to 66 million years ago, around the time of the extinction of the dinosaurs. In early white shark evolution there are at least two lineages: one lineage is of white sharks with coarsely serrated teeth and it probably gave rise to the modern great white shark, and another lineage is of white sharks with finely serrated teeth. These sharks attained gigantic proportions and include the extinct megatoothed shark, C. megalodon . Like most extinct sharks, C. megalodon is also primarily known from its fossil teeth and vertebrae. This giant shark reached a total length (TL) of more than 16 metres (52 ft). [20] [21] C. megalodon may have approached a maxima of 20.3 metres (67 ft) in total length and 103 metric tons (114 short tons ) in mass. [22] Paleontological evidence suggests that this shark was an active predator of large cetaceans. [22]

Early Miocene extinction event

A study published in 2021 provided evidence for a major shark extinction event that occurred 19 million years ago. This is 5 million years before the established Middle Miocene disruption. The cause of this extinction event is not yet known, however, the study suggests that pelagic shark diversity decreased by over 70% and abundance by over 90%, and that modern sharks never recovered from this event. The authors also state that prior to the extinction event, "sharks played a much larger role in the open-ocean ecosystem than they do today." [23] [24]


Identification of the 8 extant shark orders Extant Shark Orders (illustrated).png
Identification of the 8 extant shark orders

Sharks belong to the superorder Selachimorpha in the subclass Elasmobranchii in the class Chondrichthyes. The Elasmobranchii also include rays and skates; the Chondrichthyes also include Chimaeras. It was thought that the sharks form a polyphyletic group: some sharks are more closely related to rays than they are to some other sharks, [25] but current molecular studies support monophyly of both groups of sharks and batoids. [26] [27]

The superorder Selachimorpha is divided into Galea (or Galeomorphii), and Squalea (or Squalomorphii). The Galeans are the Heterodontiformes, Orectolobiformes, Lamniformes, and Carcharhiniformes. Lamnoids and Carcharhinoids are usually placed in one clade, but recent studies show the Lamnoids and Orectoloboids are a clade. Some scientists now think that Heterodontoids may be Squalean. The Squaleans are divided into Hexanchiformes and Squalomorpha. The former includes cow shark and frilled shark, though some authors propose both families to be moved to separate orders. The Squalomorpha contains the Squaliformes and the Hypnosqualea. The Hypnosqualea may be invalid. It includes the Squatiniformes, and the Pristorajea, which may also be invalid, but includes the Pristiophoriformes and the Batoidea. [25] [28]

There are more than 470 species of sharks split across twelve orders, including four orders of sharks that have gone extinct: [28]


General anatomical features of sharks Parts of a shark.svg
General anatomical features of sharks


The teeth of tiger sharks are oblique and serrated to saw through flesh Tiger shark teeth.jpg
The teeth of tiger sharks are oblique and serrated to saw through flesh

Shark teeth are embedded in the gums rather than directly affixed to the jaw, and are constantly replaced throughout life. Multiple rows of replacement teeth grow in a groove on the inside of the jaw and steadily move forward in comparison to a conveyor belt; some sharks lose 30,000 or more teeth in their lifetime. The rate of tooth replacement varies from once every 8 to 10 days to several months. In most species, teeth are replaced one at a time as opposed to the simultaneous replacement of an entire row, which is observed in the cookiecutter shark. [29]

Tooth shape depends on the shark's diet: those that feed on mollusks and crustaceans have dense and flattened teeth used for crushing, those that feed on fish have needle-like teeth for gripping, and those that feed on larger prey such as mammals have pointed lower teeth for gripping and triangular upper teeth with serrated edges for cutting. The teeth of plankton-feeders such as the basking shark are small and non-functional. [30]


Shark skeletons are very different from those of bony fish and terrestrial vertebrates. Sharks and other cartilaginous fish (skates and rays) have skeletons made of cartilage and connective tissue. Cartilage is flexible and durable, yet is about half the normal density of bone. This reduces the skeleton's weight, saving energy. [31] Because sharks do not have rib cages, they can easily be crushed under their own weight on land. [32]


The jaws of sharks, like those of rays and skates, are not attached to the cranium. The jaw's surface (in comparison to the shark's vertebrae and gill arches) needs extra support due to its heavy exposure to physical stress and its need for strength. It has a layer of tiny hexagonal plates called "tesserae", which are crystal blocks of calcium salts arranged as a mosaic. [33] This gives these areas much of the same strength found in the bony tissue found in other animals.

Generally sharks have only one layer of tesserae, but the jaws of large specimens, such as the bull shark, tiger shark, and the great white shark, have two to three layers or more, depending on body size. The jaws of a large great white shark may have up to five layers. [31] In the rostrum (snout), the cartilage can be spongy and flexible to absorb the power of impacts.


Fin skeletons are elongated and supported with soft and unsegmented rays named ceratotrichia, filaments of elastic protein resembling the horny keratin in hair and feathers. [34] Most sharks have eight fins. Sharks can only drift away from objects directly in front of them because their fins do not allow them to move in the tail-first direction. [32]

Dermal denticles

The dermal denticles of a lemon shark, viewed through a scanning electron microscope Denticules cutanes du requin citron Negaprion brevirostris vus au microscope electronique a balayage.jpg
The dermal denticles of a lemon shark, viewed through a scanning electron microscope

Unlike bony fish, sharks have a complex dermal corset made of flexible collagenous fibers and arranged as a helical network surrounding their body. This works as an outer skeleton, providing attachment for their swimming muscles and thus saving energy. [35] Their dermal teeth give them hydrodynamic advantages as they reduce turbulence when swimming. [36]


Tails provide thrust, making speed and acceleration dependent on tail shape. Caudal fin shapes vary considerably between shark species, due to their evolution in separate environments. Sharks possess a heterocercal caudal fin in which the dorsal portion is usually noticeably larger than the ventral portion. This is because the shark's vertebral column extends into that dorsal portion, providing a greater surface area for muscle attachment. This allows more efficient locomotion among these negatively buoyant cartilaginous fish. By contrast, most bony fish possess a homocercal caudal fin. [37]

Tiger sharks have a large upper lobe, which allows for slow cruising and sudden bursts of speed. The tiger shark must be able to twist and turn in the water easily when hunting to support its varied diet, whereas the porbeagle shark, which hunts schooling fish such as mackerel and herring, has a large lower lobe to help it keep pace with its fast-swimming prey. [38] Other tail adaptations help sharks catch prey more directly, such as the thresher shark's usage of its powerful, elongated upper lobe to stun fish and squid.



Unlike bony fish, sharks do not have gas-filled swim bladders for buoyancy. Instead, sharks rely on a large liver filled with oil that contains squalene, and their cartilage, which is about half the normal density of bone. [35] Their liver constitutes up to 30% of their total body mass. [39] The liver's effectiveness is limited, so sharks employ dynamic lift to maintain depth while swimming. Sand tiger sharks store air in their stomachs, using it as a form of swim bladder. Bottom-dwelling sharks, like the nurse shark, have negative buoyancy, allowing them to rest on the ocean floor.

Some sharks, if inverted or stroked on the nose, enter a natural state of tonic immobility. Researchers use this condition to handle sharks safely. [40]


Like other fish, sharks extract oxygen from seawater as it passes over their gills. Unlike other fish, shark gill slits are not covered, but lie in a row behind the head. A modified slit called a spiracle lies just behind the eye, which assists the shark with taking in water during respiration and plays a major role in bottom–dwelling sharks. Spiracles are reduced or missing in active pelagic sharks. [30] While the shark is moving, water passes through the mouth and over the gills in a process known as "ram ventilation". While at rest, most sharks pump water over their gills to ensure a constant supply of oxygenated water. A small number of species have lost the ability to pump water through their gills and must swim without rest. These species are obligate ram ventilators and would presumably asphyxiate if unable to move. Obligate ram ventilation is also true of some pelagic bony fish species. [41] [42]

The respiration and circulation process begins when deoxygenated blood travels to the shark's two-chambered heart. Here the shark pumps blood to its gills via the ventral aorta artery where it branches into afferent brachial arteries. Reoxygenation takes place in the gills and the reoxygenated blood flows into the efferent brachial arteries, which come together to form the dorsal aorta. The blood flows from the dorsal aorta throughout the body. The deoxygenated blood from the body then flows through the posterior cardinal veins and enters the posterior cardinal sinuses. From there blood enters the heart ventricle and the cycle repeats. [43]


Most sharks are "cold-blooded" or, more precisely, poikilothermic, meaning that their internal body temperature matches that of their ambient environment. Members of the family Lamnidae (such as the shortfin mako shark and the great white shark) are homeothermic and maintain a higher body temperature than the surrounding water. In these sharks, a strip of aerobic red muscle located near the center of the body generates the heat, which the body retains via a countercurrent exchange mechanism by a system of blood vessels called the rete mirabile ("miraculous net"). The common thresher and bigeye thresher sharks have a similar mechanism for maintaining an elevated body temperature. [44]


In contrast to bony fish, with the exception of the coelacanth, [45] the blood and other tissue of sharks and Chondrichthyes is generally isotonic to their marine environments because of the high concentration of urea (up to 2.5% [46] ) and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), allowing them to be in osmotic balance with the seawater. This adaptation prevents most sharks from surviving in freshwater, and they are therefore confined to marine environments. A few exceptions exist, such as the bull shark, which has developed a way to change its kidney function to excrete large amounts of urea. [39] When a shark dies, the urea is broken down to ammonia by bacteria, causing the dead body to gradually smell strongly of ammonia. [47] [48]

Research in 1930 by Homer W. Smith showed that sharks' urine doesn't contain sufficient sodium to avoid hypernatremia, and it was postulated that there must be an additional mechanism for salt secretion. In 1960 it was discovered at the Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory in Salsbury Cove, Maine that sharks have a type of salt gland located at the end of the intestine, known as the "rectal gland", whose function is the secretion of chlorides. [49]


Digestion can take a long time. The food moves from the mouth to a J-shaped stomach, where it is stored and initial digestion occurs. [50] Unwanted items may never get past the stomach, and instead the shark either vomits or turns its stomachs inside out and ejects unwanted items from its mouth. [51]

One of the biggest differences between the digestive systems of sharks and mammals is that sharks have much shorter intestines. This short length is achieved by the spiral valve with multiple turns within a single short section instead of a long tube-like intestine. The valve provides a long surface area, requiring food to circulate inside the short gut until fully digested, when remaining waste products pass into the cloaca. [50]


A few sharks appear fluorescent under blue light, such as the swell shark and the chain catshark, where the fluorophore derives from a metabolite of kynurenic acid. [52]



The shape of the hammerhead shark's head may enhance olfaction by spacing the nostrils further apart. Hammerhead shark.jpg
The shape of the hammerhead shark's head may enhance olfaction by spacing the nostrils further apart.

Sharks have keen olfactory senses, located in the short duct (which is not fused, unlike bony fish) between the anterior and posterior nasal openings, with some species able to detect as little as one part per million of blood in seawater. [53] The size of the olfactory bulb varies across different shark species, with size dependent on how much a given species relies on smell or vision to find their prey. [54] In environments with low visibility, shark species generally have larger olfactory bulbs. [54] In reefs, where visibility is high, species of sharks from the family Carcharhinidae have smaller olfactory bulbs. [54] Sharks found in deeper waters also have larger olfactory bulbs. [55]

Sharks have the ability to determine the direction of a given scent based on the timing of scent detection in each nostril. [56] This is similar to the method mammals use to determine direction of sound.

They are more attracted to the chemicals found in the intestines of many species, and as a result often linger near or in sewage outfalls. Some species, such as nurse sharks, have external barbels that greatly increase their ability to sense prey.


Eye of a bigeyed sixgill shark (Hexanchus nakamurai) Hexanchus nakamurai JNC2615 Eye.JPG
Eye of a bigeyed sixgill shark (Hexanchus nakamurai)

Shark eyes are similar to the eyes of other vertebrates, including similar lenses, corneas and retinas, though their eyesight is well adapted to the marine environment with the help of a tissue called tapetum lucidum. This tissue is behind the retina and reflects light back to it, thereby increasing visibility in the dark waters. The effectiveness of the tissue varies, with some sharks having stronger nocturnal adaptations. Many sharks can contract and dilate their pupils, like humans, something no teleost fish can do. Sharks have eyelids, but they do not blink because the surrounding water cleans their eyes. To protect their eyes some species have nictitating membranes. This membrane covers the eyes while hunting and when the shark is being attacked. However, some species, including the great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), do not have this membrane, but instead roll their eyes backwards to protect them when striking prey. The importance of sight in shark hunting behavior is debated. Some believe that electro- and chemoreception are more significant, while others point to the nictating membrane as evidence that sight is important. Presumably, the shark would not protect its eyes were they unimportant. The use of sight probably varies with species and water conditions. The shark's field of vision can swap between monocular and stereoscopic at any time. [57] A micro-spectrophotometry study of 17 species of shark found 10 had only rod photoreceptors and no cone cells in their retinas giving them good night vision while making them colorblind. The remaining seven species had in addition to rods a single type of cone photoreceptor sensitive to green and, seeing only in shades of grey and green, are believed to be effectively colorblind. The study indicates that an object's contrast against the background, rather than colour, may be more important for object detection. [58] [59] [60]


Although it is hard to test the hearing of sharks, they may have a sharp sense of hearing and can possibly hear prey from many miles away. [61] A small opening on each side of their heads (not the spiracle) leads directly into the inner ear through a thin channel. The lateral line shows a similar arrangement, and is open to the environment via a series of openings called lateral line pores. This is a reminder of the common origin of these two vibration- and sound-detecting organs that are grouped together as the acoustico-lateralis system. In bony fish and tetrapods the external opening into the inner ear has been lost.

Electromagnetic field receptors (ampullae of Lorenzini) and motion detecting canals in the head of a shark Electroreceptors in a sharks head.svg
Electromagnetic field receptors (ampullae of Lorenzini) and motion detecting canals in the head of a shark


The ampullae of Lorenzini are the electroreceptor organs. They number in the hundreds to thousands. Sharks use the ampullae of Lorenzini to detect the electromagnetic fields that all living things produce. [62] This helps sharks (particularly the hammerhead shark) find prey. The shark has the greatest electrical sensitivity of any animal. Sharks find prey hidden in sand by detecting the electric fields they produce. Ocean currents moving in the magnetic field of the Earth also generate electric fields that sharks can use for orientation and possibly navigation. [63]

Lateral line

This system is found in most fish, including sharks. It is a tactile sensory system which allows the organism to detect water speed and pressure changes near by. [64] The main component of the system is the neuromast, a cell similar to hair cells present in the vertebrate ear that interact with the surrounding aquatic environment. This helps sharks distinguish between the currents around them, obstacles off on their periphery, and struggling prey out of visual view. The shark can sense frequencies in the range of 25 to 50  Hz. [65]

Life history

The claspers of male spotted wobbegong Wobbegong claspers.jpg
The claspers of male spotted wobbegong
Shark egg Scyliorhinus canicula foetus in an egg.jpg
Shark egg
The spiral egg case of a Port Jackson shark PortJacksonShark'sEgg20050417c.JPG
The spiral egg case of a Port Jackson shark

Shark lifespans vary by species. Most live 20 to 30 years. The spiny dogfish has one of the longest lifespans at more than 100 years. [66] Whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) may also live over 100 years. [67] Earlier estimates suggested the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) could reach about 200 years, but a recent study found that a 5.02-metre-long (16.5 ft) specimen was 392 ± 120 years old (i.e., at least 272 years old), making it the longest-lived vertebrate known. [68] [69]


Unlike most bony fish, sharks are K-selected reproducers, meaning that they produce a small number of well-developed young as opposed to a large number of poorly developed young. Fecundity in sharks ranges from 2 to over 100 young per reproductive cycle. [70] Sharks mature slowly relative to many other fish. For example, lemon sharks reach sexual maturity at around age 13–15. [71]


Sharks practice internal fertilization. [72] The posterior part of a male shark's pelvic fins are modified into a pair of intromittent organs called claspers, analogous to a mammalian penis, of which one is used to deliver sperm into the female. [73]

Mating has rarely been observed in sharks. [74] The smaller catsharks often mate with the male curling around the female. In less flexible species the two sharks swim parallel to each other while the male inserts a clasper into the female's oviduct. Females in many of the larger species have bite marks that appear to be a result of a male grasping them to maintain position during mating. The bite marks may also come from courtship behavior: the male may bite the female to show his interest. In some species, females have evolved thicker skin to withstand these bites. [73]


There have been a number of documented cases in which a female shark who has not been in contact with a male has conceived a pup on her own through parthenogenesis. [75] [76] The details of this process are not well understood, but genetic fingerprinting showed that the pups had no paternal genetic contribution, ruling out sperm storage. The extent of this behavior in the wild is unknown. Mammals are now the only major vertebrate group in which asexual reproduction has not been observed.

Scientists say that asexual reproduction in the wild is rare, and probably a last-ditch effort to reproduce when a mate is not present. Asexual reproduction diminishes genetic diversity, which helps build defenses against threats to the species. Species that rely solely on it risk extinction. Asexual reproduction may have contributed to the blue shark's decline off the Irish coast. [77]


Sharks display three ways to bear their young, varying by species, oviparity, viviparity and ovoviviparity. [78] [79]


Most sharks are ovoviviparous, meaning that the eggs hatch in the oviduct within the mother's body and that the egg's yolk and fluids secreted by glands in the walls of the oviduct nourishes the embryos. The young continue to be nourished by the remnants of the yolk and the oviduct's fluids. As in viviparity, the young are born alive and fully functional. Lamniforme sharks practice oophagy , where the first embryos to hatch eat the remaining eggs. Taking this a step further, sand tiger shark pups cannibalistically consume neighboring embryos. The survival strategy for ovoviviparous species is to brood the young to a comparatively large size before birth. The whale shark is now classified as ovoviviparous rather than oviparous, because extrauterine eggs are now thought to have been aborted. Most ovoviviparous sharks give birth in sheltered areas, including bays, river mouths and shallow reefs. They choose such areas for protection from predators (mainly other sharks) and the abundance of food. Dogfish have the longest known gestation period of any shark, at 18 to 24 months. Basking sharks and frilled sharks appear to have even longer gestation periods, but accurate data are lacking. [78]


Some species are oviparous, laying their fertilized eggs in the water. In most oviparous shark species, an egg case with the consistency of leather protects the developing embryo(s). These cases may be corkscrewed into crevices for protection. The egg case is commonly called a mermaid's purse . Oviparous sharks include the horn shark, catshark, Port Jackson shark, and swellshark. [78] [80]


Viviparity is the gestation of young without the use of a traditional egg, and results in live birth. [81] Viviparity in sharks can be placental or aplacental. [81] Young are born fully formed and self-sufficient. [81] Hammerheads, the requiem sharks (such as the bull and blue sharks), and smoothhounds are viviparous. [70] [78]


The classic view describes a solitary hunter, ranging the oceans in search of food. However, this applies to only a few species. Most live far more social, sedentary, benthic lives, and appear likely to have their own distinct personalities. [82] Even solitary sharks meet for breeding or at rich hunting grounds, which may lead them to cover thousands of miles in a year. [83] Shark migration patterns may be even more complex than in birds, with many sharks covering entire ocean basins.

Sharks can be highly social, remaining in large schools. Sometimes more than 100 scalloped hammerheads congregate around seamounts and islands, e.g., in the Gulf of California. [39] Cross-species social hierarchies exist. For example, oceanic whitetip sharks dominate silky sharks of comparable size during feeding. [70]

When approached too closely some sharks perform a threat display. This usually consists of exaggerated swimming movements, and can vary in intensity according to the threat level. [84]


In general, sharks swim ("cruise") at an average speed of 8 kilometres per hour (5.0 mph), but when feeding or attacking, the average shark can reach speeds upwards of 19 kilometres per hour (12 mph). The shortfin mako shark, the fastest shark and one of the fastest fish, can burst at speeds up to 50 kilometres per hour (31 mph). [85] The great white shark is also capable of speed bursts. These exceptions may be due to the warm-blooded, or homeothermic, nature of these sharks' physiology. Sharks can travel 70 to 80 km in a day. [86]


Sharks possess brain-to-body mass ratios that are similar to mammals and birds, [87] and have exhibited apparent curiosity and behavior resembling play in the wild. [88] [89]

There is evidence that juvenile lemon sharks can use observational learning in their investigation of novel objects in their environment. [90]


All sharks need to keep water flowing over their gills in order for them to breathe; however, not all species need to be moving to do this. Those that are able to breathe while not swimming do so by using their spiracles to force water over their gills, thereby allowing them to extract oxygen from the water. It has been recorded that their eyes remain open while in this state and actively follow the movements of divers swimming around them [91] and as such they are not truly asleep.

Species that do need to swim continuously to breathe go through a process known as sleep swimming, in which the shark is essentially unconscious. It is known from experiments conducted on the spiny dogfish that its spinal cord, rather than its brain, coordinates swimming, so spiny dogfish can continue to swim while sleeping, and this also may be the case in larger shark species. [91] In 2016 a great white shark was captured on video for the first time in a state researchers believed was sleep swimming. [92]



Most sharks are carnivorous. [93] Basking sharks, whale sharks, and megamouth sharks have independently evolved different strategies for filter feeding plankton: basking sharks practice ram feeding, whale sharks use suction to take in plankton and small fishes, and megamouth sharks make suction feeding more efficient by using the luminescent tissue inside of their mouths to attract prey in the deep ocean. This type of feeding requires gill rakers—long, slender filaments that form a very efficient sieve—analogous to the baleen plates of the great whales. The shark traps the plankton in these filaments and swallows from time to time in huge mouthfuls. Teeth in these species are comparatively small because they are not needed for feeding. [93]

Unlike many other sharks, the great white shark is not actually an apex predator in all of its natural environments, as it is sometimes hunted by orcas Surfacing great white shark.jpg
Unlike many other sharks, the great white shark is not actually an apex predator in all of its natural environments, as it is sometimes hunted by orcas

Other highly specialized feeders include cookiecutter sharks, which feed on flesh sliced out of other larger fish and marine mammals. Cookiecutter teeth are enormous compared to the animal's size. The lower teeth are particularly sharp. Although they have never been observed feeding, they are believed to latch onto their prey and use their thick lips to make a seal, twisting their bodies to rip off flesh. [39]

Some seabed–dwelling species are highly effective ambush predators. Angel sharks and wobbegongs use camouflage to lie in wait and suck prey into their mouths. [94] Many benthic sharks feed solely on crustaceans which they crush with their flat molariform teeth.

Other sharks feed on squid or fish, which they swallow whole. The viper dogfish has teeth it can point outwards to strike and capture prey that it then swallows intact. The great white and other large predators either swallow small prey whole or take huge bites out of large animals. Thresher sharks use their long tails to stun shoaling fishes, and sawsharks either stir prey from the seabed or slash at swimming prey with their tooth-studded rostra.

Many sharks, including the whitetip reef shark are cooperative feeders and hunt in packs to herd and capture elusive prey. These social sharks are often migratory, traveling huge distances around ocean basins in large schools. These migrations may be partly necessary to find new food sources. [95]

Range and habitat

Sharks are found in all seas. They generally do not live in fresh water, with a few exceptions such as the bull shark and the river shark which can swim both in seawater and freshwater. [96] Sharks are common down to depths of 2,000 metres (7,000 ft), and some live even deeper, but they are almost entirely absent below 3,000 metres (10,000 ft). The deepest confirmed report of a shark is a Portuguese dogfish at 3,700 metres (12,100 ft). [97]

Relationship with humans


A sign warning about the presence of sharks in Salt Rock, South Africa Shark warning - Salt Rock South Africa.jpg
A sign warning about the presence of sharks in Salt Rock, South Africa
Snorkeler swims near a blacktip reef shark. In rare circumstances involving poor visibility, blacktips may bite a human, mistaking it for prey. Under normal conditions they are harmless and shy. Snorkeler with blacktip reef shark.jpg
Snorkeler swims near a blacktip reef shark. In rare circumstances involving poor visibility, blacktips may bite a human, mistaking it for prey. Under normal conditions they are harmless and shy.

In 2006 the International Shark Attack File (ISAF) undertook an investigation into 96 alleged shark attacks, confirming 62 of them as unprovoked attacks and 16 as provoked attacks. The average number of fatalities worldwide per year between 2001 and 2006 from unprovoked shark attacks is 4.3. [98]

Contrary to popular belief, only a few sharks are dangerous to humans. Out of more than 470 species, only four have been involved in a significant number of fatal, unprovoked attacks on humans: the great white, oceanic whitetip, tiger, and bull sharks. [99] [100] These sharks are large, powerful predators, and may sometimes attack and kill people. Despite being responsible for attacks on humans they have all been filmed without using a protective cage. [101]

The perception of sharks as dangerous animals has been popularized by publicity given to a few isolated unprovoked attacks, such as the Jersey Shore shark attacks of 1916, and through popular fictional works about shark attacks, such as the Jaws film series. Jaws author Peter Benchley, as well as Jaws director Steven Spielberg, later attempted to dispel the image of sharks as man-eating monsters. [102]

To help avoid an unprovoked attack, humans should not wear jewelry or metal that is shiny and refrain from splashing around too much. [103]

In general, sharks show little pattern of attacking humans specifically. Research indicates that when humans do become the object of a shark attack, it is possible that the shark has mistaken the human for species that are its normal prey, such as seals. [104] [105]

In captivity

Until recently, only a few benthic species of shark, such as hornsharks, leopard sharks and catsharks, had survived in aquarium conditions for a year or more. This gave rise to the belief that sharks, as well as being difficult to capture and transport, were difficult to care for. More knowledge has led to more species (including the large pelagic sharks) living far longer in captivity, along with safer transportation techniques that have enabled long-distance transportation. [106] The great white shark had never been successfully held in captivity for long periods of time until September 2004, when the Monterey Bay Aquarium successfully kept a young female for 198 days before releasing her.

A whale shark in Georgia Aquarium Male whale shark at Georgia Aquarium.jpg
A whale shark in Georgia Aquarium

Most species are not suitable for home aquaria, and not every species sold by pet stores are appropriate. Some species can flourish in home saltwater aquaria. [107] Uninformed or unscrupulous dealers sometimes sell juvenile sharks like the nurse shark, which upon reaching adulthood is far too large for typical home aquaria. [107] Public aquaria generally do not accept donated specimens that have outgrown their housing. Some owners have been tempted to release them. [107] Species appropriate to home aquaria represent considerable spatial and financial investments as they generally approach adult lengths of 3 feet (90 cm) and can live up to 25 years. [107]

In culture

In Hawaii

Sharks figure prominently in Hawaiian mythology. Stories tell of men with shark jaws on their back who could change between shark and human form. A common theme was that a shark-man would warn beach-goers of sharks in the waters. The beach-goers would laugh and ignore the warnings and get eaten by the shark-man who warned them. Hawaiian mythology also includes many shark gods. Among a fishing people, the most popular of all aumakua, or deified ancestor guardians, are shark aumakua. Kamaku describes in detail how to offer a corpse to become a shark. The body transforms gradually until the kahuna can point the awe-struck family to the markings on the shark's body that correspond to the clothing in which the beloved's body had been wrapped. Such a shark aumakua becomes the family pet, receiving food, and driving fish into the family net and warding off danger. Like all aumakua it had evil uses such as helping kill enemies. The ruling chiefs typically forbade such sorcery. Many Native Hawaiian families claim such an aumakua, who is known by name to the whole community. [108]

Kamohoali'i is the best known and revered of the shark gods, he was the older and favored brother of Pele, [109] and helped and journeyed with her to Hawaii. He was able to assume all human and fish forms. A summit cliff on the crater of Kilauea is one of his most sacred spots. At one point he had a heiau (temple or shrine) dedicated to him on every piece of land that jutted into the ocean on the island of Molokai. Kamohoali'i was an ancestral god, not a human who became a shark and banned the eating of humans after eating one herself. [110] [111] In Fijian mythology, Dakuwaqa was a shark god who was the eater of lost souls.

In American Samoa

On the island of Tutuila in American Samoa (a U.S. territory), there is a location called Turtle and Shark (Laumei ma Malie) which is important in Samoan culture — the location is the site of a legend called O Le Tala I Le Laumei Ma Le Malie, in which two humans are said to have transformed into a turtle and a shark. [112] [113] [114] According to the U.S. National Park Service, "Villagers from nearby Vaitogi continue to reenact an important aspect of the legend at Turtle and Shark by performing a ritual song intended to summon the legendary animals to the ocean surface, and visitors are frequently amazed to see one or both of these creatures emerge from the sea in apparent response to this call." [112]

In contrast to the complex portrayals by Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders, the European and Western view of sharks has historically been mostly of fear and malevolence. [115] Sharks are used in popular culture commonly as eating machines, notably in the Jaws novel and the film of the same name, along with its sequels. [116] Sharks are threats in other films such as Deep Blue Sea , The Reef , and others, although they are sometimes used for comedic effect such as in Finding Nemo and the Austin Powers series. Sharks tend to be seen quite often in cartoons whenever a scene involves the ocean. Such examples include the Tom and Jerry cartoons, Jabberjaw , and other shows produced by Hanna-Barbera. They also are used commonly as a clichéd means of killing off a character that is held up by a rope or some similar object as the sharks swim right below them, or the character may be standing on a plank above shark infested waters.[ citation needed ]

A popular myth is that sharks are immune to disease and cancer, but this is not scientifically supported. Sharks have been known to get cancer. [117] [118] Both diseases and parasites affect sharks. The evidence that sharks are at least resistant to cancer and disease is mostly anecdotal and there have been few, if any, scientific or statistical studies that show sharks to have heightened immunity to disease. [119] Other apparently false claims are that fins prevent cancer [120] and treat osteoarthritis. [121] No scientific proof supports these claims; at least one study has shown shark cartilage of no value in cancer treatment. [122]

Threats to sharks

The annual shark catch has increased rapidly over the last 60 years. Global shark catch.svg
The annual shark catch has increased rapidly over the last 60 years.
The value of shark fins for shark fin soup has led to an increase in shark catches where usually only the fins are taken, while the rest of the shark is discarded, typically into the sea; health concerns about BMAA in the fins now exists regarding consumption of the soup Sharksfin.jpg
The value of shark fins for shark fin soup has led to an increase in shark catches where usually only the fins are taken, while the rest of the shark is discarded, typically into the sea; health concerns about BMAA in the fins now exists regarding consumption of the soup
A 14-foot (4.3 m), 1,200-pound (540 kg) tiger shark caught in Kane'ohe Bay, Oahu in 1966 Tiger shark, Hawaii Aii.jpg
A 14-foot (4.3 m), 1,200-pound (540 kg) tiger shark caught in Kāne'ohe Bay, Oahu in 1966


In 2008, it was estimated that nearly 100 million sharks were being killed by people every year, due to commercial and recreational fishing. [123] [124] In 2021, it was estimated that the population of oceanic sharks and rays had dropped by 71% over the previous half-century. [7]

Shark finning yields are estimated at 1.44 million metric tons (1.59 million short tons) for 2000, and 1.41 million metric tons (1.55 million short tons) for 2010. Based on an analysis of average shark weights, this translates into a total annual mortality estimate of about 100 million sharks in 2000, and about 97 million sharks in 2010, with a total range of possible values between 63 and 273 million sharks per year. [125] [126] Sharks are a common seafood in many places, including Japan and Australia. In the Australian state of Victoria, shark is the most commonly used fish in fish and chips, [ citation needed ] in which fillets are battered and deep-fried or crumbed and grilled. In fish and chip shops, shark is called flake. In India, small sharks or baby sharks (called sora in Tamil language, Telugu language) are sold in local markets. Since the flesh is not developed, cooking the flesh breaks it into powder, which is then fried in oil and spices (called sora puttu/sora poratu). The soft bones can be easily chewed. They are considered a delicacy in coastal Tamil Nadu. Icelanders ferment Greenland sharks to produce a delicacy called hákarl. [127] During a four-year period from 1996 to 2000, an estimated 26 to 73 million sharks were killed and traded annually in commercial markets. [128]

Sharks are often killed for shark fin soup. Fishermen capture live sharks, fin them, and dump the finless animal back into the water. Shark finning involves removing the fin with a hot metal blade. [124] The resulting immobile shark soon dies from suffocation or predators. [129] Shark fin has become a major trade within black markets all over the world. Fins sell for about $300/lb in 2009. [130] Poachers illegally fin millions each year. Few governments enforce laws that protect them. [126] In 2010 Hawaii became the first U.S. state to prohibit the possession, sale, trade or distribution of shark fins. [131] From 1996 to 2000, an estimated 38 million sharks had been killed per year for harvesting shark fins. [128] It is estimated by TRAFFIC that over 14,000 tonnes of shark fins were exported into Singapore between 2005–2007 and 2012–2014. [132]

Shark fin soup is a status symbol in Asian countries and is erroneously considered healthy and full of nutrients. Scientific research has revealed, however, that high concentrations of BMAA are present in shark fins. [133] Because BMAA is a neurotoxin, consumption of shark fin soup and cartilage pills, therefore, may pose a health risk. [134] BMAA is under study for its pathological role in neurodegegerative diseases such as, ALS, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease.

Sharks are also killed for meat. European diners consume dogfishes, smoothhounds, catsharks, makos, porbeagle and also skates and rays. [135] However, the U.S. FDA lists sharks as one of four fish (with swordfish, king mackerel, and tilefish) whose high mercury content is hazardous to children and pregnant women.

Sharks generally reach sexual maturity only after many years and produce few offspring in comparison to other harvested fish. Harvesting sharks before they reproduce severely impacts future populations. Capture induced premature birth and abortion (collectively called capture-induced parturition) occurs frequently in sharks/rays when fished. [72] Capture-induced parturition is rarely considered in fisheries management despite being shown to occur in at least 12% of live bearing sharks and rays (88 species to date). [72]

The majority of shark fisheries have little monitoring or management. The rise in demand for shark products increases pressure on fisheries. [40] Major declines in shark stocks have been recorded—some species have been depleted by over 90% over the past 20–30 years with population declines of 70% not unusual. [136] A study by the International Union for Conservation of Nature suggests that one quarter of all known species of sharks and rays are threatened by extinction and 25 species were classified as critically endangered. [137] [138]

Shark culling

In 2014, a shark cull in Western Australia killed dozens of sharks (mostly tiger sharks) using drum lines, [139] until it was cancelled after public protests and a decision by the Western Australia EPA; from 2014 to 2017, there was an "imminent threat" policy in Western Australia in which sharks that "threatened" humans in the ocean were shot and killed. [140] This "imminent threat" policy was criticized by senator Rachel Siewart for killing endangered sharks. [141] The "imminent threat" policy was cancelled in March 2017. [142] In August 2018, the Western Australia government announced a plan to re-introduce drum lines (though, this time the drum lines are "SMART" drum lines). [143]

From 1962 to the present, [144] the government of Queensland has targeted and killed sharks in large numbers by using drum lines, under a "shark control" program—this program has also inadvertently killed large numbers of other animals such as dolphins; it has also killed endangered hammerhead sharks. [145] [146] [147] [148] Queensland's drum line program has been called "outdated, cruel and ineffective". [148] From 2001 to 2018, a total of 10,480 sharks were killed on lethal drum lines in Queensland, including in the Great Barrier Reef. [149] From 1962 to 2018, roughly 50,000 sharks were killed by Queensland authorities. [150]

The government of New South Wales has a program that deliberately kills sharks using nets. [147] [151] The current net program in New South Wales has been described as being "extremely destructive" to marine life, including sharks. [152] Between 1950 and 2008, 352 tiger sharks and 577 great white sharks were killed in the nets in New South Wales — also during this period, a total of 15,135 marine animals were killed in the nets, including dolphins, whales, turtles, dugongs, and critically endangered grey nurse sharks. [153] There has been a very large decrease in the number of sharks in eastern Australia, and the shark-killing programs in Queensland and New South Wales are partly responsible for this decrease. [150]

Kwazulu-Natal, an area of South Africa, has a shark-killing program using nets and drum lines—these nets and drum lines have killed turtles and dolphins, and have been criticized for killing wildlife. [154] During a 30-year period, more than 33,000 sharks have been killed in KwaZulu-Natal's shark-killing program — during the same 30-year period, 2,211 turtles, 8,448 rays, and 2,310 dolphins were killed in KwaZulu-Natal. [154] Authorities on the French island of Réunion kill about 100 sharks per year. [155]

Killing sharks negatively affects the marine ecosystem. [156] [157] Jessica Morris of Humane Society International calls shark culling a "knee-jerk reaction" and says, "sharks are top order predators that play an important role in the functioning of marine ecosystems. We need them for healthy oceans." [158]

George H. Burgess, the former [159] director of the International Shark Attack File, "describes [shark] culling as a form of revenge, satisfying a public demand for blood and little else"; [160] he also said shark culling is a "retro-type move reminiscent of what people would have done in the 1940s and 50s, back when we didn't have an ecological conscience and before we knew the consequences of our actions." [160] Jane Williamson, an associate professor in marine ecology at Macquarie University, says "There is no scientific support for the concept that culling sharks in a particular area will lead to a decrease in shark attacks and increase ocean safety." [161]

Other threats

Other threats include habitat alteration, damage and loss from coastal development, pollution and the impact of fisheries on the seabed and prey species. [162] The 2007 documentary Sharkwater exposed how sharks are being hunted to extinction. [163]


In 1991, South Africa was the first country in the world to declare Great White sharks a legally protected species [164] (however, the KwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board is allowed to kill great white sharks in its "shark control" program in eastern South Africa). [154]

Intending to ban the practice of shark finning while at sea, the United States Congress passed the Shark Finning Prohibition Act in 2000. [165] Two years later the Act saw its first legal challenge in United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins . In 2008 a Federal Appeals Court ruled that a loophole in the law allowed non-fishing vessels to purchase shark fins from fishing vessels while on the high seas. [166] Seeking to close the loophole, the Shark Conservation Act was passed by Congress in December 2010, and it was signed into law in January 2011. [167] [168]

In 2003, the European Union introduced a general shark finning ban for all vessels of all nationalities in Union waters and for all vessels flying a flag of one of its member states. [169] This prohibition was amended in June 2013 to close remaining loopholes. [170]

In 2009, the International Union for Conservation of Nature's IUCN Red List of Endangered Species named 64 species, one-third of all oceanic shark species, as being at risk of extinction due to fishing and shark finning. [171] [172]

In 2010, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) rejected proposals from the United States and Palau that would have required countries to strictly regulate trade in several species of scalloped hammerhead, oceanic whitetip and spiny dogfish sharks. The majority, but not the required two-thirds of voting delegates, approved the proposal. China, by far the world's largest shark market, and Japan, which battles all attempts to extend the convention to marine species, led the opposition. [173] [174] In March 2013, three endangered commercially valuable sharks, the hammerheads, the oceanic whitetip and porbeagle were added to Appendix 2 of CITES, bringing shark fishing and commerce of these species under licensing and regulation. [175]

In 2010, Greenpeace International added the school shark, shortfin mako shark, mackerel shark, tiger shark and spiny dogfish to its seafood red list, a list of common supermarket fish that are often sourced from unsustainable fisheries. [176] Advocacy group Shark Trust campaigns to limit shark fishing. Advocacy group Seafood Watch directs American consumers to not eat sharks. [177]

Under the auspices of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), also known as the Bonn Convention, the Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Sharks was concluded and came into effect in March 2010. It was the first global instrument concluded under CMS and aims at facilitating international coordination for the protection, conservation and management of migratory sharks, through multilateral, intergovernmental discussion and scientific research.

In July 2013, New York state, a major market and entry point for shark fins, banned the shark fin trade joining seven other states of the United States and the three Pacific U.S territories in providing legal protection to sharks. [178]

In the United States, and as of January 16, 2019, 12 states including (Massachusetts, Maryland, Delaware, California, Illinois, Hawaii, Oregon, Nevada, Rhode Island, Washington, New York and Texas) along with 3 U.S. territories (American Samoa, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands) have passed laws against the sale or possession of shark fins. [179] [180]

Several regions now have shark sanctuaries or have banned shark fishing — these regions include American Samoa, the Bahamas, the Cook Islands, French Polynesia, Guam, the Maldives, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, the Northern Mariana Islands, and Palau. [181] [182] [183]

In April 2020 researchers reported to have traced the origins of shark fins of endangered hammerhead sharks from a retail market in Hong Kong back to their source populations and therefore the approximate locations where the sharks were first caught using DNA analysis. [184] [185]

In July 2020 scientists reported results of a survey of 371 reefs in 58 nations estimating the conservation status of reef sharks globally. No sharks have been observed on almost 20% of the surveyed reefs and shark depletion was strongly associated with both socio-economic conditions and conservation measures. [186] [187] Sharks are considered to be a vital part of the ocean ecosystem.

According to a 2021 study in Nature , [188] overfishing has resulted in a 71% global decline in the number of oceanic sharks and rays over the preceding 50 years. The oceanic whitetip, and both the scalloped hammerhead and great hammerheads are now classified as critically endangered. [189] Sharks in tropical waters have declined more rapidly than those in temperate zones during the period studied. [190]

See also

Related Research Articles

Hammerhead shark Family of sharks

The hammerhead sharks are a group of sharks that form the family Sphyrnidae, so named for the unusual and distinctive structure of their heads, which are flattened and laterally extended into a "hammer" shape called a cephalofoil. Most hammerhead species are placed in the genus Sphyrna, while the winghead shark is placed in its own genus, Eusphyra. Many, but not necessarily mutually exclusive, functions have been postulated for the cephalofoil, including sensory reception, manoeuvering, and prey manipulation. The cephalofoil gives the shark superior binocular vision and depth perception.

Tiger shark Species of requiem shark

The tiger shark is a species of requiem shark and the only extant member of the genus Galeocerdo. It is a large macropredator, capable of attaining a length over 5 m. Populations are found in many tropical and temperate waters, especially around central Pacific islands. Its name derives from the dark stripes down its body, which resemble a tiger's pattern, but fade as the shark matures.

Oceanic whitetip shark Species of fish

The oceanic whitetip shark, also known as Brown Milbert's sand bar shark, brown shark, lesser white shark, nigano shark, oceanic white-tipped whaler, and silvertip shark, is a large pelagic requiem shark inhabiting tropical and warm temperate seas. Its stocky body is most notable for its long, white-tipped, rounded fins.

Grey reef shark Species of shark

The grey reef shark is a species of requiem shark, in the family Carcharhinidae. One of the most common reef sharks in the Indo-Pacific, it is found as far east as Easter Island and as far west as South Africa. This species is most often seen in shallow water near the drop-offs of coral reefs. It has the typical "reef shark" shape, with a broad, round snout and large eyes. It can be distinguished from similar species by the plain or white-tipped first dorsal fin, the dark tips on the other fins, the broad, black rear margin on the tail fin, and the lack of a ridge between the dorsal fins. Most individuals are less than 1.88 m (6.2 ft) long.

Silky shark Species of fish

The silky shark, also known by numerous names such as blackspot shark, grey whaler shark, olive shark, ridgeback shark, sickle shark, sickle-shaped shark and sickle silk shark, is a species of requiem shark, in the family Carcharhinidae, named for the smooth texture of its skin. It is one of the most abundant sharks in the pelagic zone, and can be found around the world in tropical waters. Highly mobile and migratory, this shark is most often found over the edge of the continental shelf down to 50 m (164 ft). The silky shark has a slender, streamlined body and typically grows to a length of 2.5 m. It can be distinguished from other large requiem sharks by its relatively small first dorsal fin with a curving rear margin, its tiny second dorsal fin with a long free rear tip, and its long, sickle-shaped pectoral fins. It is a deep, metallic bronze-gray above and white below.

Barracuda Genus of fishes, the Barracudas

A barracuda, or cuda for short, is a large, predatory, ray-finned fish known for its fearsome appearance and ferocious behaviour. The barracuda is a saltwater fish of the genus Sphyraena, the only genus in the family Sphyraenidae which was named by Constantine Samuel Rafinesque in 1815. It is found in tropical and subtropical oceans worldwide ranging from the eastern border of the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea, on its western border the Caribbean Sea, and in tropical areas of the Pacific Ocean. Barracudas reside near the top of the water and near coral reefs and sea grasses. Barracudas are targeted by sport-fishing enthusiasts.

Blacktip reef shark Species of shark

The blacktip reef shark is a species of requiem shark, in the family Carcharhinidae, which can be easily identified by the prominent black tips on its fins. Among the most abundant sharks inhabiting the tropical coral reefs of the Indian and Pacific Oceans, this species prefers shallow, inshore waters. Its exposed first dorsal fin is a common sight in the region. The blacktip reef shark is usually found over reef ledges and sandy flats, though it has also been known to enter brackish and freshwater environments. It typically attains a length of 1.6 m (5.2 ft).

<i>Sphyrna</i> Genus of sharks

Sphyrna is a genus of hammerhead sharks with a cosmopolitan distribution in the world's oceans. Members of Sphyrna have a tendency to inhabit coastal waters along the intertidal zone rather than the open ocean, as their prey such as invertebrates, fish, rays, small crustaceans, and other benthic organisms hide in the sands and sediment along these zones. Members of Sphyrna are also known by synonyms such as Zygaena, Cestracion, and Sphyrichthys. The earliest species described of this genus was Sphyrna zygaena by Carl Linnaeus in 1758, while the latest described member, Sphyrna gilberti, was discovered and described in 2013.

Great hammerhead Species of shark

The great hammerhead is the largest species of hammerhead shark, belonging to the family Sphyrnidae, attaining an average length of 4.6 m (15 ft) and reaching a maximum length of 6.1 m (20 ft). It is found in tropical and warm temperate waters worldwide, inhabiting coastal areas and the continental shelf. The great hammerhead can be distinguished from other hammerheads by the shape of its "hammer", which is wide with an almost straight front margin, and by its tall, sickle-shaped first dorsal fin. A solitary, strong-swimming apex predator, the great hammerhead feeds on a wide variety of prey ranging from crustaceans and cephalopods, to bony fish, to smaller sharks. Observations of this species in the wild suggest that the cephalofoil functions to immobilize stingrays, a favored prey. This species has a viviparous mode of reproduction, bearing litters of up to 55 pups every two years.

Smooth hammerhead Species of shark

The smooth hammerhead is a species of hammerhead shark, and part of the family Sphyrnidae. This species is named "smooth hammerhead" because of the distinctive shape of the head, which is flattened and laterally extended into a hammer shape, without an indentation in the middle of the front margin. Unlike other hammerheads, this species prefers temperate waters and occurs worldwide at medium latitudes. In the summer, these sharks migrate towards the poles following cool water masses, sometimes forming schools numbering in the hundreds to thousands.

Bonnethead Genus of sharks

The bonnethead, also called a bonnet shark or shovelhead, is a small member of the hammerhead shark genus Sphyrna, and part of the family Sphyrnidae. It is an abundant species in the littoral zone of the North Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico, is the only shark species known to display sexual dimorphism in the morphology of the head, and is the only shark species known to be omnivorous.

Silvertip shark Species of shark

The silvertip shark is a large species of requiem shark, in the family Carcharhinidae, with a fragmented distribution throughout the tropical Indian and Pacific Oceans. It is often encountered around offshore islands and coral reefs, and has been known to dive to a depth of 800 m (2,600 ft). The silvertip shark resembles a larger and bulkier grey reef shark, but can be easily identified by the prominent white margins on its fins. It attains a maximum length of 3 m (10 ft).

Caribbean reef shark Species of shark

The Caribbean reef shark is a species of requiem shark, belonging to the family Carcharhinidae. It is found in the tropical waters of the western Atlantic Ocean from Florida to Brazil, and is the most commonly encountered reef shark in the Caribbean Sea. With a robust, streamlined body typical of the requiem sharks, this species is difficult to tell apart from other large members of its family such as the dusky shark and the silky shark. Distinguishing characteristics include dusky-colored fins without prominent markings, a short free rear tip on the second dorsal fin, and tooth shape and number.

Galapagos shark Species of shark

The Galapagos shark is a species of requiem shark, in the family Carcharhinidae, found worldwide. It favors clear reef environments around oceanic islands, where it is often the most abundant shark species. A large species that often reaches 3.0 m (9.8 ft), the Galapagos reef shark has a typical fusiform "reef shark" shape and is very difficult to distinguish from the dusky shark and the grey reef shark. An identifying character of this species is its tall first dorsal fin, which has a slightly rounded tip and originates over the rear tips of the pectoral fins.

Scalloped hammerhead Species of shark

The scalloped hammerhead is a species of hammerhead shark in the family Sphyrnidae. It was originally known as Zygaena lewini. The Greek word sphyrna translates into "hammer" in English, referring to the shape of this shark's head. The most distinguishing characteristic of this shark, as in all hammerheads, is the "hammer"-shaped head. The shark's eyes and nostrils are at the tips of the extensions. It is a fairly large hammerhead, but is still smaller than both the great and smooth hammerheads.

Kuhls maskray Species of cartilaginous fish

Kuhl's maskray, also known as the blue-spotted stingray, blue-spotted maskray, or Kuhl's stingray, is a species of stingray of the family Dasyatidae. It was recently changed from Dasyatis kuhlii in 2008 after morphological and molecular analyses showed that it is part of a distinct genus, Neotrygon. The body is rhomboidal and colored green with blue spots. Maximum disk width is estimated 46.5 cm (18.3 in). It is popular in aquaria, but usually not distinguished from the blue-spotted ribbontail ray. The ribbontail has a rounded body, is a brighter green with brighter blue and more vivid spots, but Kuhl's maskray is larger. The stingray's lifespan is estimated at 13 years for females and 10 years for males. The blue-spotted stingray preys on many fish and small mollusks. It is also generally found from Indonesia to Japan, and most of Australia. Kuhl's maskray also is targeted by many parasites, such as tapeworms, flatworms, and flukes.

Environmental impact of fishing

The environmental impact of fishing includes issues such as the availability of fish, overfishing, fisheries, and fisheries management; as well as the impact of industrial fishing on other elements of the environment, such as by-catch. These issues are part of marine conservation, and are addressed in fisheries science programs. According to a 2019 FAO report, global production of fish, crustaceans, molluscs and other aquatic animals has continued to grow and reached 172.6 million tonnes in 2017, with an increase of 4.1 percent compared with 2016. There is a growing gap between the supply of fish and demand, due in part to world population growth.

Coral reef fish Fish which live amongst or in close relation to coral reefs

Coral reef fish are fish which live amongst or in close relation to coral reefs. Coral reefs form complex ecosystems with tremendous biodiversity. Among the myriad inhabitants, the fish stand out as colourful and interesting to watch. Hundreds of species can exist in a small area of a healthy reef, many of them hidden or well camouflaged. Reef fish have developed many ingenious specialisations adapted to survival on the reefs.

Batoidea superorder of cartilaginous fishes commonly known as rays

Batoidea is a superorder of cartilaginous fishes commonly known as rays. They and their close relatives, the sharks, comprise the subclass Elasmobranchii. Rays are the largest group of cartilaginous fishes, with well over 600 species in 26 families. Rays are distinguished by their flattened bodies, enlarged pectoral fins that are fused to the head, and gill slits that are placed on their ventral surfaces.

Giant oceanic manta ray Species of cartilaginous fish

The giant oceanic manta ray, giant manta ray, or oceanic manta ray, is a species of ray in the family Mobulidae, and the largest type of ray in the world. It is circumglobal and is typically found in tropical and subtropical waters, but can also be found in temperate waters. Until 2017, the species was classified in the genus Manta, along with the smaller reef manta ray. DNA testing revealed that both species are more closely related to rays of the genus Mobula than previously thought. As a result, the giant manta was renamed as Mobula birostris to reflect the new classification. This is the fish with the largest brain of all the fishes, at 130 grams, five times greater than expected, three times larger than the brains of whale sharks that have ten times their body mass. The brain is heated by blood, and their amazing brainpower is reflected in passing the mirror test.


  1. "Selachii (shark)". The Paleontological Database (PBDB). Archived from the original on 2018-07-10. Retrieved 2018-07-10.
  2. | Motta, P.; Habegger, M. L.; Lang, A.; Hueter, R.; Davis, J. (2012). "Selachii (shark)". Journal of Morphology. 273 (10): 1096–1110. doi:10.1002/jmor.20047. PMID   22730019. S2CID   23881820.
  3. 1 2 Martin, R. Aidan. "Geologic Time". ReefQuest. Archived from the original on 2012-01-24. Retrieved 2006-09-09.
  4. Pimiento, Catalina; Cantalapiedra, Juan L.; Shimada, Kenshu; Field, Daniel J.; Smaers, Jeroen B. (24 January 2019). "Evolutionary pathways toward gigantism in sharks and rays". Evolution. 73 (2): 588–599. doi:10.1111/evo.13680. PMID   30675721. S2CID   59224442.
  5. Allen, Thomas B. (1999). The Shark Almanac . New York: The Lyons Press. ISBN   978-1-55821-582-5. OCLC   39627633.
  6. Budker, Paul (1971). The Life of Sharks. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. SBN 297003070.
  7. 1 2 Einhorn, Catrin (January 27, 2021). "Shark Populations Are Crashing, With a 'Very Small Window' to Avert Disaster". The New York Times . Retrieved January 31, 2021.
  8. "Online Etymology Dictionary". Archived from the original on 2012-10-04. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  9. Marx, Robert F. (1990). The History of Underwater Exploration . Courier Dover Publications. p.  3. ISBN   978-0-486-26487-5.
  10. Online Etymology Dictionary, shark.
  11. Jones, Tom. "The Xoc, the Sharke, and the Sea Dogs: An Historical Encounter". Archived from the original on 2008-11-21. Retrieved 2009-07-11.
  12. "Shark". Middle English Dictionary. University of Michigan. Archived from the original on 2013-08-20. Retrieved 2014-02-02.
  13. 1 2 Martin, R. Aidan. "The Earliest Sharks". ReefQuest. Archived from the original on 2008-12-23. Retrieved 2009-02-10.
  14. 1 2 3 Martin, R. Aidan. "Ancient Sharks". ReefQuest. Archived from the original on 2012-12-18. Retrieved 2006-09-09.
  15. 1 2 Martin, R. Aidan. "The Origin of Modern Sharks". ReefQuest. Archived from the original on 2006-06-18. Retrieved 2006-09-09.
  16. "Xenacanth" Archived 2007-01-07 at the Wayback Machine . Hooper Virtual Natural History Museum. Retrieved on 11/26/06.
  17. "Biology of Sharks and Rays: 'The Earliest Sharks'" Archived 2007-03-02 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved on 11/26/06.
  18. Pradel, A.; Maisey, J. G.; Tafforeau, P.; Mapes, R. H.; Mallatt, J. (2014). "A Palaeozoic shark with osteichthyan-like branchial arches". Nature . 509 (7502): 608–611. Bibcode:2014Natur.509..608P. doi:10.1038/nature13195. PMID   24739974. S2CID   3504437.
  19. Martin, R. Aidan. "The Rise of Modern Sharks". Archived from the original on 2012-10-16. Retrieved 2007-08-28.
  20. Klimley, Peter; Ainley, David (1996). Great White Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon carcharias. Academic Press. ISBN   978-0-12-415031-7.
  21. Pimiento, Catalina; Dana J. Ehret; Bruce J. MacFadden; Gordon Hubbell (May 10, 2010). Stepanova, Anna (ed.). "Ancient Nursery Area for the Extinct Giant Shark Megalodon from the Miocene of Panama". PLOS ONE. 5 (5): e10552. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...510552P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010552. PMC   2866656 . PMID   20479893.
  22. 1 2 Wroe, S.; Huber, D. R.; Lowry, M.; McHenry, C.; Moreno, K.; Clausen, P.; Ferrara, T. L.; Cunningham, E.; Dean, M. N.; Summers, A. P. (2008). "Three-dimensional computer analysis of white shark jaw mechanics: how hard can a great white bite?". Journal of Zoology. 276 (4): 336–342. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00494.x.
  23. Sibert, Elizabeth C.; Rubin, Leah D. (2021-06-04). "An early Miocene extinction in pelagic sharks". Science. 372 (6546): 1105–1107. doi:10.1126/science.aaz3549. ISSN   0036-8075.
  24. Elassar, Alaa (13 June 2021). "Scientists say 90% of the world's open-ocean sharks died off in mystery extinction event 19 million years ago". . Retrieved 13 June 2021.
  25. 1 2 "Sharks (Chondrichthyes)". FAO. Archived from the original on 2008-08-02. Retrieved 2009-09-14.
  26. Pavan-Kumar, A.; Gireesh-Babu, P.; Babu, P. P. Suresh; Jaiswar, A. K.; Hari Krishna, V.; Prasasd, K. Pani; Chaudhari, Aparna; Raje, S. G.; Chakraborty, S. K. (January 2014). "Molecular phylogeny of elasmobranchs inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear markers". Molecular Biology Reports. 41 (1): 447–457. doi:10.1007/s11033-013-2879-6. PMID   24293104. S2CID   16018112.
  27. Amaral, Cesar R. L.; Pereira, Filipe; Silva, Dayse A.; Amorim, António; de Carvalho, Elizeu F. (2017-09-20). "The mitogenomic phylogeny of the Elasmobranchii (Chondrichthyes)". Mitochondrial DNA. Part A, DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis. 29 (6): 867–878. doi:10.1080/24701394.2017.1376052. PMID   28927318. S2CID   3258973.
  28. 1 2 "Compagno's FAO Species List - 1984". Archived from the original on 2010-05-28. Retrieved 2009-09-14.
  29. Martin, R. Aidan. "Teeth of the Skin". Archived from the original on 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2007-08-28.
  30. 1 2 Gilbertson, Lance (1999). Zoology Laboratory Manual. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. ISBN   978-0-07-237716-3.
  31. 1 2 Martin, R. Aidan. "Skeleton in the Corset". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2009-11-25. Retrieved 2009-08-21.
  32. 1 2 "A Shark's Skeleton & Organs". Archived from the original on August 5, 2010. Retrieved August 14, 2009.
  33. Hamlett, W. C. (1999f). Sharks, Skates and Rays: The Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN   978-0-8018-6048-5. OCLC   39217534.
  34. Hamlett, William C. (April 23, 1999). Sharks, skates, and rays: the biology of elasmobranch fishes (1 ed.). p 56: The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 528. ISBN   978-0-8018-6048-5.CS1 maint: location (link)
  35. 1 2 Martin, R. Aidan. "The Importance of Being Cartilaginous". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2009-02-27. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
  36. Martin, R. Aidan. "Skin of the Teeth". Archived from the original on 2012-01-24. Retrieved 2007-08-28.
  37. Michael, Bright. "Jaws: The Natural History of Sharks". Columbia University. Archived from the original on 2009-05-11. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
  38. Nelson, Joseph S. (1994). Fishes of the World. New York: John Wiley and Sons. ISBN   978-0-471-54713-6. OCLC   28965588.
  39. 1 2 3 4 Compagno, Leonard; Dando, Marc; Fowler, Sarah (2005). Sharks of the World. Collins Field Guides. ISBN   978-0-00-713610-0. OCLC   183136093.
  40. 1 2 Pratt, H. L. Jr; Gruber, S. H.; Taniuchi, T (1990). Elasmobranchs as living resources: Advances in the biology, ecology, systematics, and the status of the fisheries. NOAA Tech Rept.
  41. William J. Bennetta (1996). "Deep Breathing". Archived from the original on 2007-08-14. Retrieved 2007-08-28.
  42. "Do sharks sleep". 2017-05-02. Archived from the original on 2010-09-18.
  43. "SHARKS & RAYS, SeaWorld/Busch Gardens ANIMALS, CIRCULATORY SYSTEM". Busch Entertainment Corporation. Archived from the original on 2009-04-24. Retrieved 2009-09-03.
  44. Martin, R. Aidan (April 1992). "Fire in the Belly of the Beast". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2009-09-17. Retrieved 2009-08-21.
  45. Griffith, R. W (1980). "Chemistry of the Body Fluids of the Coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 208 (1172): 329–347. Bibcode:1980RSPSB.208..329G. doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0054. JSTOR   35431. PMID   6106196. S2CID   38498079.
  46. "Sharkproject". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  47. John A. Musick (2005). "Management techniques for elasmobranch fisheries: 14. Shark Utilization". FAO: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. Archived from the original on 2011-07-22. Retrieved 2008-03-16.
  48. Thomas Batten. "MAKO SHARK Isurus oxyrinchus". Delaware Sea Grant, University of Delaware. Archived from the original on 2008-03-11. Retrieved 2008-03-16.
  49. Forrest, John N. (Jnr.) (2016). "The Shark Rectal Gland Model: A Champion of Receptor Mediated Chloride Secretion Through CFTR". Transactions of the American Clinical Climatological Association. 127: 162–175. PMC   5216465 . PMID   28066051.
  50. 1 2 Martin, R. Aidan. "No Guts, No Glory". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2009-08-11. Retrieved 2009-08-22.
  51. Potenza, Alessandra (20 June 2017). "Sharks literally puke their guts out — here's why". The Verge . Archived from the original on 19 June 2017. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
  52. Park, Hyun Bong; Lam, Yick Chong; Gaffney, Jean P.; Weaver, James C.; Krivoshik, Sara Rose; Hamchand, Randy; Pieribone, Vincent; Gruber, David F.; Crawford, Jason M. (27 September 2019). "Bright Green Biofluorescence in Sharks Derives from Bromo-Kynurenine Metabolism". iScience. 19: 1291–1336. Bibcode:2019iSci...19.1291P. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.07.019 . PMC   6831821 . PMID   31402257.
  53. Martin, R. Aidan. "Smell and Taste". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2009-12-07. Retrieved 2009-08-21.
  54. 1 2 3 Yopak, Kara E.; Lisney, Thomas J.; Collin, Shaun P. (2015-03-01). "Not all sharks are "swimming noses": variation in olfactory bulb size in cartilaginous fishes". Brain Structure and Function. 220 (2): 1127–1143. doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0705-0. ISSN   1863-2661. PMID   24435575. S2CID   2829434.
  55. Yopak, Kara E.; Lisney, Thomas J.; Darlington, Richard B.; Collin, Shaun P.; Montgomery, John C.; Finlay, Barbara L. (2010-07-20). "A conserved pattern of brain scaling from sharks to primates". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 (29): 12946–12951. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10712946Y. doi:10.1073/pnas.1002195107. ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   2919912 . PMID   20616012. S2CID   2151639.
  56. The Function of Bilateral Odor Arrival Time Differences in Olfactory Orientation of Sharks Archived 2012-03-08 at the Wayback Machine , Jayne M. Gardiner, Jelle Atema, Current Biology - 13 July 2010 (Vol. 20, Issue 13, pp. 1187-1191)
  57. Martin, R. Aidan. "Vision and a Carpet of Light". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2009-04-29. Retrieved 2009-08-22.
  58. "Sharks are colour-blind, new study finds". Archived from the original on 2011-01-24. Retrieved 2011-02-03.
  59. Gill, Victoria (2011-01-18). "Sharks are probably colour-blind". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2011-01-19. Retrieved 2011-01-19.
  60. Nathan Scott Hart, Susan Michelle Theiss, Blake Kristin Harahush and Shaun Patrick Collin (2011). "Microspectrophotometric evidence for cone monochromacy in sharks". Naturwissenschaften. 98 (3): 193–201. Bibcode:2011NW.....98..193H. doi:10.1007/s00114-010-0758-8. PMID   21212930. S2CID   30148811.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  61. Martin, R. Aidan. "Hearing and Vibration Detection". Archived from the original on 2008-05-01. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  62. Kalmijn AJ (1982). "Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes". Science. 218 (4575): 916–8. Bibcode:1982Sci...218..916K. doi:10.1126/science.7134985. PMID   7134985.
  63. Meyer CG; Holland KN; Papastamatiou YP (2005). "Sharks can detect changes in the geomagnetic field". Journal of the Royal Society, Interface. 2 (2): 129–30. doi:10.1098/rsif.2004.0021. PMC   1578252 . PMID   16849172.
  64. Bleckmann, Horst; Zelick, Randy (March 2009). "Lateral line system of fish". Integrative Zoology. 4 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4877.2008.00131.x. ISSN   1749-4877. PMID   21392273.
  65. Popper, A. N.; C. Platt (1993). "Inner ear and lateral line". The Physiology of Fishes (1st ed).
  66. "Mote Marine Laboratory, "Shark Notes"". Archived from the original on 2012-01-24. Retrieved 2012-08-27.
  67. "Florida Museum of Natural History Ichthyology Department, "National Shark Research Consortium–Shark Basics"". Archived from the original on September 4, 2007.
  68. Nielsen, J.; Hedeholm, R. B.; Heinemeier, J.; Bushnell, P. G.; Christiansen, J. S.; Olsen, J.; Ramsey, C. B.; Brill, R. W.; Simon, M.; Steffensen, K. F.; Steffensen, J. F. (2016-08-12). "Eye lens radiocarbon reveals centuries of longevity in the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus)". Science . 353 (6300): 702–704. Bibcode:2016Sci...353..702N. doi:10.1126/science.aaf1703. PMID   27516602. S2CID   206647043.
  69. Pennisi, Elizabeth (11 August 2016). "Greenland shark may live 400 years, smashing longevity record". Science . doi:10.1126/science.aag0748. Archived from the original on 12 August 2016. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
  70. 1 2 3 Leonard J. V. Compagno (1984). Sharks of the World: An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ISBN   978-92-5-104543-5. OCLC   156157504.
  71. Gruber, Samuel H. (February 21, 2000). "LIFE STYLE OF SHARKS". Archived from the original on July 27, 2011. Retrieved June 20, 2010.
  72. 1 2 3 Adams, Kye R.; Fetterplace, Lachlan C.; Davis, Andrew R.; Taylor, Matthew D.; Knott, Nathan A. (January 2018). "Sharks, rays and abortion: The prevalence of capture-induced parturition in elasmobranchs". Biological Conservation. 217: 11–27. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.010. Archived from the original on 2019-02-23. Retrieved 2018-11-24.
  73. 1 2 Martin, R. Aidan. "Why Do Sharks Have Two Penises?". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2009-08-28. Retrieved 2009-08-22.
  74. "How Do Sharks Mate? - Center For Ocean Life". Center For Ocean Life. Archived from the original on 2018-09-06. Retrieved 2018-09-09.
  75. Chapman DD; Shivji MS; Louis E; Sommer J; Fletcher H; Prodöhl PA (2007). "Virgin birth in a hammerhead shark". Biology Letters. 3 (4): 425–7. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0189. PMC   2390672 . PMID   17519185.
  76. In shark tank, an asexual birth Archived 2009-07-09 at the Wayback Machine , Boston Globe, 10 Oct. 2008
  77. Fountain, Henry (2007-05-23). "Female sharks reproduce without male DNA, scientists say". The New York Times, New York City. Archived from the original on 2009-04-17. Retrieved 2007-11-13.
  78. 1 2 3 4 "SHARKS & RAYS, SeaWorld/Busch Gardens ANIMALS, BIRTH & CARE OF YOUNG". Busch Entertainment Corporation. Archived from the original on 2013-08-03. Retrieved 2009-09-03.
  79. Adams, Kye R; Fetterplace, Lachlan C; Davis, Andrew R; Taylor, Matthew D; Knott, Nathan A (2018). "Sharks, rays and abortion: The prevalence of capture-induced parturition in elasmobranchs". Biological Conservation. 217: 11–27. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.010. Archived from the original on 2019-02-23. Retrieved 2018-11-24.
  80. "Marine Biology notes". School of Life Sciences, Napier University. Archived from the original on 2003-08-23. Retrieved 2006-09-12.
  81. 1 2 3 Carrier, J.C; Musick, J.A.; Heithaus, M.R. (2012). Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives: Second Edition. Taylor & Francis Group.
  82. The truth about sharks: Far from being 'killing machines', they have personalities, best friends and an exceptional capacity for learning Archived 2015-07-03 at the Wayback Machine (2014-11-28), The Independent
  83. Ravilious, Kate (2005-10-07). "Scientists track shark's 12,000 mile round-trip". Guardian Unlimited. London. Retrieved 2006-09-17.
  84. Richard H. Johnson & Donald R. Nelson (1973-03-05). "Agonistic Display in the Gray Reef Shark, Carcharhinus menisorrah, and Its Relationship to Attacks on Man". Copeia. 1973 (1): 76–84. doi:10.2307/1442360. JSTOR   1442360.
  85. Reefquest Center for Shark Research. What's the Speediest Marine Creature? Archived 2009-04-14 at the Wayback Machine
  86. The secret life of sharks Archived 2012-04-05 at the Wayback Machine , Maria Moscaritolo, The Adelaide Advertiser, 3 March 2012.
  87. Kathreen E. Ruckstuhl; Peter Neuhaus, eds. (January 23, 2006). "Sexual Segregation in Sharks". Sexual segregation in vertebrates. Cambridge University Press. p. 128. ISBN   978-0-521-83522-0.
  88. "Is the White Shark Intelligent". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2012-01-24. Retrieved 2006-08-07.
  89. "Biology of the Porbeagle". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2013-02-17. Retrieved 2006-08-07.
  90. Guttridge, T.L., van Dijk, S., Stamhuis, E.J., Krause, J., Gruber, S.H. and Brown, C. (2013). "Social learning in juvenile lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris". Animal Cognition. 16 (1): 55–64. doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0550-6. PMID   22933179. S2CID   351363. Archived from the original on 2019-04-27. Retrieved 2019-09-05.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  91. 1 2 "How Do Sharks Swim When Asleep?". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2012-01-24. Retrieved 2006-08-07.
  92. "Great White Shark Caught On Camera Napping For The First Time". NPR. 6 July 2016. Retrieved 16 December 2019.
  93. 1 2 Martin, R. Aidan. "Building a Better Mouth Trap". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2012-01-24. Retrieved 2009-08-22.
  94. Martin, R. Aidan. "Order Orectolobiformes: Carpet Sharks—39 species". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2009-04-29. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
  95. Stevens 1987
  96. "Carcharhinus leucas". University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Animal Diversity Web. Archived from the original on 2011-06-05. Retrieved 2006-09-08.
  97. Priede IG, Froese R, Bailey DM, et al. (2006). "The absence of sharks from abyssal regions of the world's oceans". Proceedings: Biological Sciences. 273 (1592): 1435–41. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3461. PMC   1560292 . PMID   16777734.
  98. "Worldwide shark attack summary". International Shark Attack File. Archived from the original on 2007-08-18. Retrieved 2007-08-28.
  99. "Statistics on Attacking Species of Shark". ISAF. Archived from the original on 2009-07-24. Retrieved 2006-09-12.
  100. "Biology of sharks and rays". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Archived from the original on 2006-02-06. Retrieved 2014-01-17.
  101. Buttigieg, Alex. "The Sharkman meets Ron & Valerie Taylor". Sharkman's Graphics. Archived from the original on 2009-03-03. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
  102. Handwerk, Brian (7 June 2002). "Jaws Author Peter Benchley Talks Sharks". National Geographic Society. Archived from the original on 25 August 2009. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
  103. "How Should We Respond When Humans and Sharks Collide?". 2013-07-04. Archived from the original on 2013-09-06. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  104. The real reasons why sharks attack humans, By Richard Gray, 8th August 2019.
  105. Global shark attack hotspots: Identifying underlying factors behind increased unprovoked shark bite incidence, by Blake K.Chapman Daryl McPhee. September 16, 2016.
  106. "Whale Sharks in Captivity". Archived from the original on September 2, 2006. Retrieved 2006-09-13.
  107. 1 2 3 4 Michael, Scott W. (March 2004). "Sharks at Home". Aquarium Fish Magazine. pp. 20–29.
  108. Beckwith, Martha (1940). "Guardian Gods". Archived from the original on May 27, 2009. Retrieved August 13, 2009.
  109. "Pele, Goddess of Fire". Archived from the original on 2006-09-01. Retrieved 2006-09-13.
  110. "Traditions of O'ahu: Stories of an Ancient Island". Archived from the original on September 18, 2009. Retrieved August 14, 2009.
  111. Taylor, Leighton R. (November 1993). Sharks of Hawaii: Their Biology and Cultural Significance. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN   978-0-8248-1562-2.
  112. 1 2 Archived 2018-10-25 at the Wayback Machine
    National Register of Historic Places Registration Form - Turtle and Shark (American Samoa). Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  113. Archived 2018-10-25 at the Wayback Machine The Turtle And The Shark. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  114. Archived 2018-11-28 at the Wayback Machine Janesocienia.coam. Samoa - Some Legends of Samoa. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  115. Crawford, Dean (2008). Shark. Reaktion Books. pp. 47–55. ISBN   978-1861893253.
  116. Jøn, A. Asbjørn; Aich, Raj S. (2015). "Southern shark lore forty years after Jaws: The positioning of sharks within Murihiku, New Zealand". Australian Folklore: A Yearly Journal of Folklore Studies (30).
  117. Finkelstein JB (2005). "Sharks do get cancer: few surprises in cartilage research". Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 97 (21): 1562–3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji392 . PMID   16264172.
  118. Ostrander GK; Cheng KC; Wolf JC; Wolfe MJ (2004). "Shark cartilage, cancer and the growing threat of pseudoscience". Cancer Research. 64 (23): 8485–91. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2260 . PMID   15574750.
  119. "Do Sharks Hold Secret to Human Cancer Fight?". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2012-01-24. Retrieved 2006-09-08.
  120. "Alternative approaches to prostate cancer treatment". Archived from the original on June 2, 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-23.
  121. Pollack, Andrew (3 June 2007). "Shark Cartilage, Not a Cancer Therapy". New York Times. Archived from the original on 11 December 2008. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
  122. The results of a study sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, and led by Dr. Charles Lu of the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, were presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology on June 2, 2007 in Chicago. Cancer patients treated with extracts from shark cartilage had a shorter median lifespan than patients receiving a placebo. "Shark fin won't help fight cancer, but ginseng will" . Retrieved 2008-06-23.[ dead link ]
  123. HowStuffWorks "How many sharks are killed recreationally each year - and why?". Retrieved on 2010-09-16. Archived March 7, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  124. 1 2 "Shark fin soup alters an ecosystem—". CNN. 2008-12-15. Archived from the original on 2010-03-26. Retrieved 2010-05-23.
  125. Worm, Boris; Davis, Brendal; Kettemer, Lisa; Ward-Paige, Christine A.; Chapman, Demian; Heithaus, Michael R.; Kessel, Steven T.; Gruber, Samuel H. (2013). "Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks". Marine Policy. 40: 194–204. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.034.
  126. 1 2 Nicholas K Dulvy; Sarah L Fowler; John A Musick; Rachel D Cavanagh; Peter M Kyne; Lucy R Harrison; John K Carlson; Lindsay NK Davidson; Sonja V Fordham; Malcolm P Francis; Caroline M Pollock; Colin A Simpfendorfer; George H Burgess; Kent E Carpenter; Leonard JV Compagno; David A Ebert; Claudine Gibson; Michelle R Heupel; Suzanne R Livingstone; Jonnell C Sanciangco; John D Stevens; Sarah Valenti; William T White (2014). "Extinction risk and conservation of the world's sharks and rays". eLife. 3: e00590. doi:10.7554/eLife.00590. PMC   3897121 . PMID   24448405. eLife 2014;3:e00590
  127. Herz, Rachel (28 January 2012). "You eat that?". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 17 March 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2012.
  128. 1 2 Bakalar, Nicholas (October 12, 2006). "38 Million Sharks Killed for Fins Annually, Experts Estimate". National Geographic. Archived from the original on October 17, 2012. Retrieved 2012-12-02.
  129. Archived August 4, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  130. Ask your senator to support the Shark Conservation Act
  131. "Hawaii: Shark Fin Soup Is Off the Menu". New York Times. Associated Press. May 28, 2010. Archived from the original on July 1, 2017. Retrieved June 2010.Check date values in: |access-date= (help) Research exemptions are available.
  132. "Sharks and Rays - Species we work with at TRAFFIC". Archived from the original on 2019-01-10. Retrieved 2019-01-10.
  133. Kiyo Mondo; Neil Hammerschlag; Margaret Basile; John Pablo; Sandra A. Banack; Deborah C. Mash (2012). "Cyanobacterial Neurotoxin β-N-Methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) in Shark Fins". Marine Drugs. 10 (2): 509–520. doi:10.3390/md10020509. PMC   3297012 . PMID   22412816.
  134. "Neurotoxins in shark fins: A human health concern". Science Daily. February 23, 2012. Archived from the original on August 9, 2019. Retrieved August 9, 2019.
  135. "Shark fisheries and trade in Europe: Fact sheet on Italy". Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-09-06.
  136. Walker, T.I. (1998). Shark Fisheries Management and Biology.
  137. France Porcher, Illa (2014-01-24). "One Quarter of Sharks and Rays Face Extinction". Archived from the original on 2014-01-26. Retrieved 2014-01-24.
  138. Morales, Alex. "Extinction Threatens 1/4 of Sharks and Rays on Red List". Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on 21 January 2014. Retrieved 24 January 2014.
  139. Brown, Sophie. "Australia: Over 170 sharks caught under controversial cull program -". Archived from the original on 1 January 2017. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  140. Milman, Oliver (23 October 2014). "WA abandons shark culling program, but reserves right to kill again". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 November 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  141. Wahlquist, Calla (12 February 2015). "Western Australia's 'serious threat' shark policy condemned by Senate". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 November 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  142. Archived 2018-09-09 at the Wayback Machine "Premier Mark McGowan's shark plan not enough to protect us". The West Australian. 19 April 2017. Retrieved 2 September 2018.
  143. Archived 2018-09-02 at the Wayback Machine Sharks to be caught on SMART drum lines off WA's South West after Labor U-turn. August 14, 2018. Retrieved September 2, 2018.
  144. "Queensland - Overview". Archived from the original on 23 August 2017. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  145. "Subscribe - theaustralian" . Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  146. "Dolphins, rays among hundreds killed on Queensland shark nets and drum lines, figures show". 25 August 2015. Archived from the original on 12 May 2017. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  147. 1 2 Archived 2018-09-19 at the Wayback Machine Shark nets in Australia – what are they and how do they work? Retrieved September 18, 2018.
  148. 1 2 Archived 2018-09-19 at the Wayback Machine Endangered Hammerhead Sharks Dead on Drum Line in Great Barrier Reef. Jack Phillips. Retrieved September 18, 2018.
  149. Archived 2018-09-04 at the Wayback Machine
    "Queensland Government Kills Sharks, Faces Court Challenge". September 4, 2018. Retrieved October 25, 2018
  150. 1 2 Archived 2018-12-23 at the Wayback Machine Aussie shark population in staggering decline. Rhian Deutrom. December 14, 2018. Retrieved December 22, 2018.
  151. "New South Wales - Overview". Archived from the original on 27 November 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  152. Archived 2018-10-13 at the Wayback Machine Here's What You Need To Know About Australia's SMART Drum Lines Being Used To Prevent Shark Attacks. Elfy Scott. July 5, 2018. Retrieved September 2, 2018.
  153. Archived 2018-10-02 at the Wayback Machine "Shark Culling". Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  154. 1 2 3 Archived 2018-09-19 at the Wayback Machine Shark nets. Retrieved September 18, 2018.
  155. Archived 2018-10-02 at the Wayback Machine "Man Who Devoted Life To Sharks, Killed Off The Coast Of Reunion". April 30, 2017. Retrieved October 25, 2018
  156. Archived 2018-10-02 at the Wayback Machine Sharks: How A Cull Could Ruin An Ecosystem. Alana Schetzer. Retrieved September 19, 2018.
  157. Archived 2018-08-06 at the Wayback Machine NBC News.No Shark Cull: Why Some Surfers Don't Want to Kill Great Whites Despite Lethal Attacks. Chloe Hubbard. April 30, 2017. Retrieved September 19, 2018.
  158. Archived 2018-10-02 at the Wayback Machine Morris, Jessica (December 8, 2016). "Shark Nets – Death Traps For Marine Animals". Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  159. Archived 2018-10-20 at the Wayback Machine Expert: Shark threat 'always going to be a problem' for Cape Cod. Doug Fraser. October 8, 2018. Cape Cod Times. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  160. 1 2 Archived 2018-09-19 at the Wayback Machine How To Swim With Sharks And Not Get Eaten. Sandro Contenta. June 16, 2014. Retrieved September 19, 2018.
  161. Archived 2019-01-17 at the Wayback Machine Mike Baird is right, culling sharks doesn’t work – here’s what we can do instead. Jane Williamson. August 17, 2015. Retrieved December 22, 2018.
  162. "The Greatest Threats to Sharks". Oceana. 2007. Archived from the original on 2009-06-03. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
  163. Sharkwater | Movies Archived 2009-04-25 at the Wayback Machine . (2007-10-31). Retrieved on 2010-09-16.
  164. "White Shark Trust - Conservation". Archived from the original on 2012-03-06. Retrieved 2012-06-15.
  165. "Bill Summary & Status, 106th Congress (1999 - 2000), H.R.5461: Major Congressional Actions". THOMAS . Library of Congress. 2000-12-21. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015. Retrieved March 27, 2012.
  166. United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins Archived 2015-10-16 at the Wayback Machine , 520 F.3d 976, (9th Cir., 2008).
  167. "Bill Summary & Status, 111th Congress (2009 - 2010), H.R.81: Major Congressional Actions". THOMAS . Library of Congress. 2011-01-04. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015. Retrieved March 27, 2012.
  168. Shark Conservation Act of 2009 | The Humane Society of the United States. Retrieved on 2010-09-16. Archived November 14, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  169. "COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1185/2003 of 26 June 2003 on the removal of fins of sharks on board vessels". European Union. 26 June 2003. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 25 Sep 2014.
  170. "REGULATION (EU) No 605/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL". 12 June 2013. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 25 Sep 2014.
  171. Camhi, M.D.; Valenti, S.V.; Fordham, S.V.; Fowler, S.L.; Gibson, C., eds. (February 2007). "The Conservation Status of Pelagic Sharks and Rays" (PDF). Pelagic Shark Red List Workshop. Oxford, England: IUCN Shark Specialist Group. ISBN   978-0-9561063-1-5. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 14, 2011. Retrieved April 3, 2012.
  172. Jha, Alok (2009-06-25). "Fishing puts a third of all oceanic shark species at risk of extinction". The Guardian . London. Archived from the original on 2013-09-06. Retrieved 2009-07-16.
  173. Jolly, David (2010-03-23). "U.N. Group Rejects Shark Protections". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2017-07-01. Retrieved 2017-02-23.
  174. "Qatar. UN body flip-flops on shark protection". Tawa News, Canwest News Service. March 26, 2010. Archived from the original on March 29, 2010.
  175. MCGrath, Matt (11 March 2013). "'Historic' day for shark protection". BBC News. Archived from the original on 10 June 2013. Retrieved 27 July 2013.
  176. "Greenpeace International Seafood Red list". 2003-03-17. Archived from the original on 2010-08-20. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  177. "Seafod WATCH, National Sustainable Seafood Guide July 2009" (PDF). July 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-04-18. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
  178. "New York Ends Shark Fin Trade - Gov. Cuomo Signs Legislation to Protect Sharks and Oceans". The Humane Society of the United States. 26 July 2013. Archived from the original on 31 July 2013. Retrieved 27 July 2013.
  179. Millward, Susan. "Restaurants Currently Offering Shark Fin Soup". Animal Welfare Institute . Archived from the original on April 6, 2019. Retrieved August 9, 2019.
  180. Fobar, Rachel (January 16, 2019). "Shark fin is banned in 12 U.S. states—but it's still on the menu". National Geographic . Archived from the original on August 9, 2019. Retrieved August 9, 2019.
  181. Archived 2018-09-03 at the Wayback Machine Laws Protecting Sharks. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
  182. Archived 2018-09-03 at the Wayback Machine Pacific Islands Band Together on a Shark Sanctuary. Joanna M. Foster. New York Times. August 4, 2011. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
  183. Urbina, Ian (February 17, 2016). "Palau vs. the Poachers". The New York Times.
  184. "Fins from endangered hammerhead sharks in Hong Kong market traced mainly to Eastern Pacific". Retrieved 17 May 2020.
  185. Fields, A. T.; Fischer, G. A.; Shea, S. K. H.; Zhang, H.; Feldheim, K. A.; Chapman, D. D. (2020). "DNA Zip-coding: identifying the source populations supplying the international trade of a critically endangered coastal shark". Animal Conservation. 23 (6): 670–678. doi:10.1111/acv.12585.
  186. "Sharks almost gone from many reefs". Retrieved 17 August 2020.
  187. MacNeil, M. Aaron; Chapman, Demian D.; Heupel, Michelle; Simpfendorfer, Colin A.; Heithaus, Michael; Meekan, Mark; Harvey, Euan; Goetze, Jordan; Kiszka, Jeremy; Bond, Mark E.; Currey-Randall, Leanne M.; Speed, Conrad W.; Sherman, C. Samantha; Rees, Matthew J.; Udyawer, Vinay; Flowers, Kathryn I.; Clementi, Gina; Valentin-Albanese, Jasmine; Gorham, Taylor; Adam, M. Shiham; Ali, Khadeeja; Pina-Amargós, Fabián; Angulo-Valdés, Jorge A.; Asher, Jacob; Barcia, Laura García; Beaufort, Océane; Benjamin, Cecilie; Bernard, Anthony T. F.; Berumen, Michael L.; et al. (July 2020). "Global status and conservation potential of reef sharks". Nature. 583 (7818): 801–806. Bibcode:2020Natur.583..801M. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2519-y. hdl: 10754/664495 . ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   32699418. S2CID   220696105 . Retrieved 17 August 2020.
  188. Pacoureau, Nathan; Rigby, Cassandra L.; Kyne, Peter M.; Sherley, Richard B.; Winker, Henning; Carlson, John K.; Fordham, Sonja V.; Barreto, Rodrigo; Fernando, Daniel; Francis, Malcolm P.; Jabado, Rima W.; Herman, Katelyn B.; Liu, Kwang-Ming; Marshall, Andrea D.; Pollom, Riley A.; Romanov, Evgeny V.; Simpfendorfer, Colin A.; Yin, Jamie S.; Kindsvater, Holly K.; Dulvy, Nicholas K. (2021). "Half a century of global decline in oceanic sharks and rays". Nature. 589 (7843): 567–571. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03173-9. PMID   33505035. S2CID   231723355.
  189. Briggs, Helen (28 January 2021). "Extinction: 'Time is running out' to save sharks and rays". BBC News . Retrieved 29 January 2021.
  190. Richardson, Holly (27 January 2021). "Shark, ray populations have declined by 'alarming' 70 per cent since 1970s, study finds". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation . Retrieved 29 January 2021.
General references

Further reading