Introduced species

"Alien species" redirects here. For life on planets other than Earth, see Extraterrestrial life.

Cattle Bos primigenius taurus introduced but not naturalized worldwide

Sweet clover (Melilotus sp.), introduced and naturalized in the Americas from Europe as a forage and cover crop

An introduced species, alien species, exotic species, adventive species, immigrant species, foreign species, non-indigenous species, or non-native species is a species living outside its native distributional range, but which has arrived there by human activity, directly or indirectly, and either deliberately or accidentally. Non-native species can have various effects on the local ecosystem. Introduced species that become established and spread beyond the place of introduction are considered naturalized. The process of human-caused introduction is distinguished from biological colonization, in which species spread to new areas through "natural" (non-human) means such as storms and rafting. The Latin expression neobiota captures the characteristic that these species are new biota to their environment in terms of established biological network (e.g. food web) relationships. Neobiota can further be divided into neozoa (also: neozoons, sing. neozoon, i.e. animals) and neophyta (plants).

The impact of introduced species is highly variable. Some have a substantial negative effect on a local ecosystem (in which case they are also classified more specifically as an invasive species), while other introduced species may have little or no negative impact (no invasiveness). Some species have been introduced intentionally to combat pests. They are called biocontrols and may be regarded as beneficial as an alternative to pesticides in agriculture for example. In some instances the potential for being beneficial or detrimental in the long run remains unknown. ^{[1] [2] [3]} The effects of introduced species on natural environments have gained much scrutiny from scientists, governments, farmers and others.

Terminology

The formal definition of an introduced species from the United States Environmental Protection Agency is "A species that has been intentionally or inadvertently brought into a region or area. Also called an exotic or non-native species". ^{[4] [5]}

In the broadest and most widely used sense, an introduced species is synonymous with "non-native" and therefore applies as well to most garden and farm organisms; these adequately fit the basic definition given above. However, some sources add to that basic definition "and are now reproducing in the wild", ^[6] which means that species growing in a garden, farm, or house may not meet the criteria unless they escape and persist.

Subset descriptions

See also: Glossary of invasion biology terms

There are many terms associated with introduced species that represent subsets of introduced species, and the terminology associated with introduced species is now in flux for various reasons. Examples of these terms are "invasive", "acclimatized", "adventive", "naturalized", and "immigrant" species.

The term "invasive" is used to describe introduced species that cause ecological, economic, or other damage to the area in which they were introduced.

Acclimatized species are introduced species that have changed physically and/or behaviorally in order to adjust to their new environment. Acclimatized species are not necessarily optimally adjusted to their new environment and may just be physically/behaviorally sufficient for the new environment.

Adventive species are often considered synonymous with "introduced species", but this term is sometimes applied exclusively to introduced species that are not permanently established. ^[7]

Naturalized species are often introduced species that do not need human help to reproduce and maintain their population in an area outside their native range (no longer adventive), but that also applies to populations migrating and establishing in a novel environment (e.g.: in Europe, house sparrows are well established since early Iron Age though they originated from Asia).

Immigrant species are species that travel, sometimes by themselves, but often with human help, between two habitats. Invasiveness is not a requirement. ^[8]

Invasive species

Introduction of a species outside its native range is all that is required to be qualified as an "introduced species". Such species might be termed naturalized, "established", or "wild non-native species". If they further spread beyond the place of introduction and cause damage to nearby species, they are called "invasive species". The transition from introduction, to establishment and to invasion has been described in the context of plants. ^[9] Introduced species are essentially "non-native" species. Invasive species are those introduced species that spread widely or quickly and cause harm, be that to the environment, ^[10] human health, other valued resources, or the economy. There have been calls from scientists to consider a species "invasive" only in terms of their spread and reproduction rather than the harm they may cause. ^[11]

According to a practical definition, an invasive species is one that has been introduced and become a pest in its new location, spreading (invading) by natural means. The term is used to imply both a sense of urgency and actual or potential harm. For example, U.S. Executive Order 13112 (1999) defines "invasive species" as "an alien species whose introduction does or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health". ^[12] The biological definition of invasive species, on the other hand, makes no reference to the harm they may cause, only to the fact that they spread beyond the area of original introduction.

Some argue that "invasive" is a loaded word and harm is difficult to define. ^[6]

From a regulatory perspective, it is neither desirable nor practical to list as undesirable or outright ban all non-native species (although the State of Hawaii has adopted an approach that comes close to this). Regulations require a definitional distinction between non-natives that are deemed especially onerous and all others. Introduced "pest" species, that are officially listed as invasive, best fit the definition of an invasive species. Early detection and rapid response is the most effective strategy for regulating a pest species and reducing economic and environmental impacts of an introduction. ^[13] Management of invasion pathways are on the forefront of eliminating unwanted invasive species this would include preliminary steps; educating the public, cooperation from industries and government resources. ^[14]

In Great Britain, the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 prevents the introduction of any animal not naturally occurring in the wild or any of a list of both animals or plants introduced previously and proved to be invasive.

Nature of introductions

By definition, a species is considered "introduced" when its transport into an area outside of its native range is human mediated. Introductions by humans can be described as either intentional or accidental. Intentional introductions have been motivated by individuals or groups who either (1) believe that the newly introduced species will be in some way beneficial to humans in its new location or, (2) species are introduced intentionally but with no regard to the potential impact. Unintentional or accidental introductions are most often a byproduct of human movements and are thus unbound to human motivations. Subsequent range expansion of introduced species may or may not involve human activity.

Wheat Triticum introduced worldwide from its place of origin (Mesopotamia)

Intentional introductions

Species that humans intentionally transport to new regions can subsequently become successfully established in two ways. In the first case, organisms are purposely released for establishment in the wild. It is sometimes difficult to predict whether a species will become established upon release, and if not initially successful, humans have made repeated introductions to improve the probability that the species will survive and eventually reproduce in the wild. In these cases, it is clear that the introduction is directly facilitated by human desires.

Male silver pheasant

In the second case, species intentionally transported into a new region may escape from captive or cultivated populations and subsequently establish independent breeding populations. Escaped organisms are included in this category because their initial transport to a new region is human motivated.

The widespread phenomena of intentional introduction has also been described as biological globalization.

Positive Introductions

Although most introduced species have negative impacts on the ecosystems they enter into, there are still some species that have affected the ecosystem in a positive way. For example, in New Hampshire invasive plants can provide some benefits to some species. Invasive species such as autumn olive, oriental bittersweet, and honeysuckle produce fruit that is used by a handful of fruit-eating bird species. ^[15] The invasive plants can also be a source of pollen and nectar for many insects, such as bees. These invasive plants were able to help their ecosystem thriving, and increase the native animal's chances of survival. Several introduced exotic trees served as nest sites for resident waterbird species in Udaipur city, India. ^[16]

Motivations for intentional introductions

Economic

Perhaps the most common motivation for introducing a species into a new place is that of economic gain. Non-native species can become such a common part of an environment, culture, and even diet that little thought is given to their geographic origin. For example, soybeans, kiwi fruit, wheat, honey bees, and all livestock except the American bison and the turkey are non-native species to North America. Collectively, non-native crops and livestock account for 98% of US food. ^[17] These and other benefits from non-natives are so vast that, according to the Congressional Research Service, they probably exceed the costs. ^[18]

Other examples of species introduced for the purposes of benefiting agriculture, aquaculture or other economic activities are widespread. ^[19] Eurasian carp was first introduced to the United States as a potential food source. The apple snail was released in Southeast Asia with the intent that it be used as a protein source, and subsequently to places like Hawaii to establish a food industry. In Alaska, foxes were introduced to many islands to create new populations for the fur trade. About twenty species of African and European dung beetles have established themselves in Australia after deliberate introduction by the Australian Dung Beetle Project in an effort to reduce the impact of livestock manure. The timber industry promoted the introduction of Monterey pine ( Pinus radiata ) from California to Australia and New Zealand as a commercial timber crop. These examples represent only a small subsample of species that have been moved by humans for economic interests.

The rise in the use of genetically modified organisms has added another potential economic advantage to introducing new/modified species into different environments. Companies such as Monsanto that earn much of their profit through the selling of genetically modified seeds has added to the controversy surrounding introduced species. The effect of genetically modified organisms varies from organism to organism and is still being researched today, however, the rise of genetically modified organisms has added complexity to the conversations surrounding introduced species.

Human enjoyment

Introductions have also been important in supporting recreation activities or otherwise increasing human enjoyment. Numerous fish and game animals have been introduced for the purposes of sport fishing and hunting. The introduced amphibian ( Ambystoma tigrinum ) that threatens the endemic California salamander ( A. californiense ) was introduced to California as a source of bait for fishermen. ^[20] Pet animals have also been frequently transported into new areas by humans, and their escapes have resulted in several introductions, such as feral cats, ^[21] parrots, ^[22] and pond slider. ^[23]

Lophura nycthemera (silver pheasant), a native of East Asia, has been introduced into parts of Europe for ornamental reasons.

Many plants have been introduced with the intent of aesthetically improving public recreation areas or private properties. The introduced Norway maple for example occupies a prominent status in many of Canada's parks. ^[24] The transport of ornamental plants for landscaping use has and continues to be a source of many introductions. Some of these species have escaped horticultural control and become invasive. Notable examples include water hyacinth, salt cedar, and purple loosestrife.

In other cases, species have been translocated for reasons of "cultural nostalgia", which refers to instances in which humans who have migrated to new regions have intentionally brought with them familiar organisms. Famous examples include the introduction of common starlings to North America by the American Eugene Schieffelin, a lover of the works of Shakespeare and the chairman of the American Acclimatization Society, who, it is rumoured, wanted to introduce all of the birds mentioned in Shakespeare's plays into the United States. He deliberately released eighty starlings into Central Park in New York City in 1890, and another forty in 1891.

Yet another prominent example of an introduced species that became invasive is the European rabbit in Australia. Thomas Austin, a British landowner, had rabbits released on his estate in Victoria because he missed hunting them. A more recent example is the introduction of the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) to North America by a Cincinnati boy, George Rau, around 1950 after a family vacation to Italy. ^[25]

Addressing environmental problems

Intentional introductions have also been undertaken with the aim of ameliorating environmental problems. A number of fast spreading plants such as kudzu have been introduced as a means of erosion control. Other species have been introduced as biological control agents to control invasive species. This involves the purposeful introduction of a natural enemy of the target species with the intention of reducing its numbers or controlling its spread.

A special case of introduction is the reintroduction of a species that has become locally endangered or extinct, done in the interests of conservation. ^[26] Examples of successful reintroductions include wolves to Yellowstone National Park in the U.S., and the red kite to parts of England and Scotland. Introductions or translocations of species have also been proposed in the interest of genetic conservation, which advocates the introduction of new individuals into genetically depauperate populations of endangered or threatened species. ^[27]

Unintentional introductions

Unintentional introductions occur when species are transported by human vectors. Increasing rates of human travel are providing accelerating opportunities for species to be accidentally transported into areas in which they are not considered native. For example, three species of rat (the black, Norway and Polynesian) have spread to most of the world as hitchhikers on ships, and arachnids such as scorpions and exotic spiders are sometimes transported to areas far beyond their native range by riding in shipments of tropical fruit. This was seen during the introduction of Steatoda nobilis (Noble false widow) worldwide through banana shipments. ^[28]

Further there are numerous examples of marine organisms being transported in ballast water, among them the invasive comb jelly Mnemiopsis leidyi , the dangerous bacterium Vibrio cholerae , or the fouling zebra mussel. The Mediterranean and Black Seas, with their high volume shipping from exotic sources, are most impacted by this problem. ^[29] Busy harbors are all potential hotspots as well: over 200 species have been introduced to the San Francisco Bay in this manner making it the most heavily invaded estuary in the world. ^[30]

There is also the accidental release of the Africanized honey bees (AHB), known colloquially as "killer bees") or Africanized bee to Brazil in 1957 and the Asian carp to the United States. The insect commonly known as the brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys) was introduced accidentally in Pennsylvania. Another form of unintentional introductions is when an intentionally introduced plant carries a parasite or herbivore with it. Some become invasive, for example, the oleander aphid, accidentally introduced with the ornamental plant, oleander.

Yet another unintentional pathway of introduction is during the delivery of humanitarian aid in the aftermath of natural disasters. ^{[31] [32]} This occurred during relief efforts for Hurricane Maria in Dominica, it was found that the common green iguana, the Cuban tree frog, and potentially the Venezuela snouted tree frog were introduced with the former two becoming established. ^[32]

Most accidentally or intentionally introduced species do not become invasive as the ones mentioned above. For instance, Some 179 coccinellid species have been introduced to the U.S. and Canada; about 27 of these non-native species have become established, and only a handful can be considered invasive, including the intentionally introduced Harmonia axyridis , multicolored Asian lady beetle. ^[33] However the small percentage of introduced species that become invasive can produce profound ecological changes. In North America, Harmonia axyridis has become the most abundant lady beetle and probably accounts for more observations than all the native lady beetles put together. ^[34]

Introduced plants

See also: Adventive plant

The horse chestnut, Aesculus hippocastanum , native to Greece and the Balkan peninsula, has been introduced across most of Europe and parts of North America as an ornamental plant. Introduced to the United Kingdom in 1616, this neophyte species has become widely distributed across the country. Though non-native, its leaves attract insects which serve as a food source for populations of native birds.

Many non-native plants have been introduced into new territories, initially as either ornamental plants or for erosion control, stock feed, or forestry. Whether an exotic will become an invasive species is seldom understood in the beginning, and many non-native ornamentals languish in the trade for years before suddenly naturalizing and becoming invasive. Studies have shown that introduced species display a greater likeliness of naturalizing when there is an appropriate environmental match, the plant species are short lived herbs or cultivate from seeds. ^[37]

Peaches, for example, originated in China, and have been carried to much of the populated world. Tomatoes are native to the Andes. Squash (pumpkins), maize (corn), and tobacco are native to the Americas, but were introduced to the Old World. Many introduced species require continued human intervention to survive in the new environment. Others may become feral, but do not seriously compete with natives, but simply increase the biodiversity of the area. One example would be Dandelions in North America, which have become an essential source of early season nectar for both native and introduced pollinators, and do not meaningfully compete with native grasses or flowers.

A very troublesome marine species in southern Europe is the seaweed Caulerpa taxifolia . Caulerpa was first observed in the Mediterranean Sea in 1984, off the coast of Monaco. By 1997, it had covered some 50 km². It has a strong potential to overgrow natural biotopes, and represents a major risk for sublittoral ecosystems. The origin of the alga in the Mediterranean was thought to be either as a migration through the Suez Canal from the Red Sea, or as an accidental introduction from an aquarium. Another troublesome plant species is the terrestrial plant Phyla canescens, which was intentionally introduced into many countries in North America, Europe, and Africa as an ornamental plant. ^{[38] [39]} This species has become invasive in Australia, where it threatens native rare plants and causes erosion and soil slumping around river banks. ^[40] It has also become invasive in France where it has been listed as an invasive plant species of concern in the Mediterranean region, where it can form monocultures that threaten critical conservation habitats. ^[41]

Japanese knotweed grows profusely in many nations. Human beings introduced it into many places in the 19th century. It is a source of resveratrol, a dietary supplement. It can grow in building foundations, threatening their stability, and spreads quite quickly. Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) has spread very widely across the Indian subcontinent and is impacting a range of wild species including urban birds. ^[42]

Introduced animals

Chickens Gallus gallus domesticus , from Asia, introduced in the rest of the world

Most introduced species do not become invasive. Examples of introduced animals that have become invasive include the gypsy moth in eastern North America, the zebra mussel and alewife in the Great Lakes, the Canada goose and gray squirrel in Europe, the beaver in Tierra del Fuego, the muskrat in Europe and Asia, the cane toad and red fox in Australia, nutria in North America, Eurasia, and Africa, and the common brushtail possum in New Zealand. In Taiwan, the success of introduced bird species was related to their native range size and body size; larger species with larger native range sizes were found to have larger introduced range sizes. ^[43]

One notoriously devastating introduced species is the small Indian mongoose ( Urva auropunctata ). Originating in a region encompassing Iran and India, it was introduced to the West Indies and Hawaii in the late 1800s for pest control. Since then, it has thrived on prey unequipped to deal with its speed, nearly leading to the local extinction of a variety of species. ^[44]

In some cases, introduced animals may unintentionally promote the cause of rewilding. ^[45] For example, escaped horses and donkeys that have gone feral in the Americas may play ecological roles similar to those of the equids that became extinct there at the end of the Pleistocene. ^[46]

The exotic pet trade has also been a large source of introduced species. The species favored as pets have more general habitat requirements and larger distributions. ^[47] Therefore, as these pets escape or are released, unintentionally or intentionally, they are more likely to survive and establish non-native populations in the wild. Among the popular exotic pets that have become alien or invasive species are parrots, frogs, terrapins, and iguanas.

Most commonly introduced species

Some species, such as the Western honey bee, brown rat, house sparrow, ring-necked pheasant, and European starling, have been introduced very widely. In addition there are some agricultural and pet species that frequently become feral; these include rabbits, dogs, ducks, snakes, goats, fish, pigs, and cats. Many water fleas such as Daphnia , Bosmina and Bythotrephes have introduced around the world, causing dramatic changes in native freshwater ecosystems. ^[48]

Genetics

When a new species is introduced, the species could potentially breed with members of native species, producing hybrids. The effect of the creating of hybrids can range from having little effect, a negative effect, to having devastating effects on native species. Potential negative effects include hybrids that are less fit for their environment resulting in a population decrease. This was seen in the Atlantic Salmon population when high levels of escape from Atlantic Salmon farms into the wild populations resulted in hybrids that had reduced survival. ^[49] Potential positive effects include adding to the genetic diversity of the population which can increase the adaptation ability of the population and increase the number of healthy individuals within a population. This was seen in the introduction of guppies in Trinidad to encourage population growth and introduce new alleles into the population. The results of this introduction included increased levels of heterozygosity and a larger population size. ^[50] Wide-spread introductions of non-native iguanas are causing devastating effects on native Iguana populations in the Caribbean Lesser Antilles, as hybrids appear to have higher fitness than native iguanas, leading to competitive outcompetition and replacement. ^{[51] [52]} Numerous populations have already become extinct and hybridization continues to reduce the number of native iguanas on multiple islands.

In plants, introduced species have been observed to undergo rapid evolutionary change to adapt to their new environments, with changes in plant height, size, leaf shape, dispersal ability, reproductive output, vegetative reproduction ability, level of dependence on the mycorrhizal network, and level of phenotype plasticity appearing on timescales of decades to centuries. ^[53]

On a planetary body

Main article: Interplanetary contamination

It has been hypothesized that invasive species of microbial life could contaminate a planetary body after the former is introduced by a space probe or spacecraft, either deliberately or unintentionally. ^[54] It has also been hypothesized that the origin of life on earth is due to introductions of life from other planets billions of years ago, possibly by a sentient race. Projects have been proposed to introduce life to other lifeless but habitable planets in other star systems some time in the future. In preparation for this, projects have been proposed to see if anything is still alive from any of the feces left behind during the six Moon landings from 1969 to 1972. ^[55]

See also

• Archaeophyte
• Adventitious plant
• Biological dispersal
• Biological hazard
• Colonisation (biology)
• Directed panspermia
• Genetic pollution
• Hemerochory
• Nativar
• Naturalisation (biology)
• Invasive species

References

1. Sax, Dov F.; Gaines, Steven D. (2008-08-12). "Species invasions and extinction: The future of native biodiversity on islands". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (supplement_1): 11490–11497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802290105 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   2556416 . PMID   18695231.
2. "Foreign Species Overview". U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Endangered Species. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2019.
3. "Foreign Species". NOAA Fisheries. Archived from the original on 28 May 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2019.
4. "U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mid-Atlantic Integrated Assessment. September 16, 2003. Introduced species". Archived from the original on 2020-05-29.
5. "Glossary | Chesapeake Bay Program". www.chesapeakebay.net. Archived from the original on 2022-06-04. Retrieved 2022-06-25.
6. Carlton, James T. (2002). Introduced Species in U.S. Coastal Waters: Environmental Impacts and Management Priorities (Report). Pew Oceans Commission. Archived from the original on 29 May 2019. Retrieved 25 June 2022.
7. Occhipinti-Ambrogi, Anna; Galil, Bella S. (November 2004). "A uniform terminology on bioinvasions: a chimera or an operative tool?" (PDF). Marine Pollution Bulletin. 49 (9–10): 688–694. Bibcode:2004MarPB..49..688O. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.08.011. PMID   15530511. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 January 2021. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
8. "Immigration, Extinction, and Island Equilibrium". Farnam Street. 2016-12-14. Archived from the original on 2021-06-11. Retrieved 2021-06-11.
9. Richardson, David M.; Pysek, Petr; Rejmanek, Marcel; Barbour, Michael G.; Panetta, F. Dane; West, Carol J. (2000). "Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions". Diversity and Distributions. 6 (2): 93–107. Bibcode:2000DivDi...6...93R. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x .
10. "IUCN SSC - Species Survival Commission". archive.ph. 2007-03-03. Archived from the original on 2007-03-03. Retrieved 2021-06-11.
11. Colautti, Robert I.; MacIsaac, Hugh J. (2004). "A neutral terminology to define 'invasive' species". Diversity and Distributions. 10 (2): 135–141. Bibcode:2004DivDi..10..135C. doi: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00061.x . S2CID   18971654.
12. Exec. Order No. 13112  (February 3, 1999)  President of the United States
13. "Invasive Species Program. Clemson University – DPI". Archived from the original on 2010-05-30.
14. Tobin, Patrick C. (2018-10-23). Managing invasive species (Report). F1000Research.
15. "Can invasive species be beneficial for wildlife?". Extension. 2018-09-26. Archived from the original on 2022-12-13. Retrieved 2022-12-13.
16. Mehta, Kanishka; Koli, Vijay K.; Kittur, Swati; Sundar, K. S. Gopi (2024). "Can you nest where you roost? Waterbirds use different sites but similar cues to locate roosting and breeding sites in a small Indian city". Urban Ecosystems. 27. doi:10.1007/s11252-023-01454-5towards (inactive 2024-04-04).
17. Pimentel, David; Lach, Lori; Zuniga, Rodolfo; Morrison, Doug (2000-01-01). "Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States". BioScience. 50 (1): 53–65. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0053:EAECON]2.3.CO;2 . ISSN   0006-3568. S2CID   44703574.
18. Johnson, Tim (9 November 2003). "Invasive Species" . The Burlington Free Press. pp. 2D, 3D. Archived from the original on 17 August 2022. Retrieved 25 June 2022.
19. Naylor, R. L. (2001). "Aquaculture—A Gateway for Exotic Species". Science. 294 (5547): 1655–1656. doi:10.1126/science.1064875. PMID   11721035. S2CID   82810702.
20. Riley, Seth P. D.; Shaffer, H. Bradley; Voss, S. Randal; Fitzpatrick, Benjamin M. (2003). "Hybridization Between a Rare, Native Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma Californiense) and its Introduced Congener". Ecological Applications. 13 (5): 1263–1275. Bibcode:2003EcoAp..13.1263R. doi:10.1890/02-5023.
21. "Effects of an Invasive Species: Domestic Cats. The Wildlife society. Fact sheet" (PDF).
22. Calzada Preston, Carlos E.; Pruett-Jones, Stephen (2021). "The Number and Distribution of Introduced and Naturalized Parrots". Diversity. 13 (9): 412. doi: 10.3390/d13090412 .
23. Reshetnikov, Andrey N. (2023-01-24). "Rarely naturalized, but widespread and even invasive: the paradox of a popular pet terrapin expansion in Eurasia". NeoBiota. 81 (1): 91–127. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.81.90473 .
24. Foster, Jennifer; Sandberg, L. Anders (2004). "Friends or Foe? Invasive Species and Public Green Space in Toronto". Geographical Review. 94 (2): 178–198. Bibcode:2004GeoRv..94..178F. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2004.tb00166.x. S2CID   161635259.
25. Deichsel, Guntram; Gist, Daniel H. "On the Origin of the Common Wall Lizards Podarcis muralis (Reptilia: Lacertidae) in Cincinnati, Ohio". www.lacerta.de. Retrieved 2023-07-22.
26. Shirey, Patrick D.; Lamberti, Gary A. (2010). "Assisted colonization under the U.S. Endangered Species Act". Conservation Letters. 3 (1): 45–52. Bibcode:2010ConL....3...45S. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00083.x .
27. Moritz, Craig (2004). "Conservation Units and Translocations: Strategies for Conserving Evolutionary Processes". Hereditas. 130 (3): 217–228. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1999.00217.x.
28. C.M.Z.S, Rev O. P. Cambridge M. A. (1879-09-01). "XXIV.—On some new and rare British Spiders, with characters of a new genus". Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 4 (21): 190–215. doi:10.1080/00222937908679818. ISSN   0374-5481.
29. Briand, Frederic; Galil, Bella (2002). "Alien marine organisms introduced by ships - An overview".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
30. Cohen, A. N.; Carlton, James T. (1998). "Accelerating Invasion Rate in a Highly Invaded Estuary". Science. 279 (5350): 555–558. Bibcode:1998Sci...279..555C. doi:10.1126/science.279.5350.555. PMID   9438847. S2CID   7874731.
31. van den Burg, Matthijs P.; Daltry, Jennifer C.; Angin, Baptiste; Boman, Erik; Brisbane, Jeanelle L. K.; Collins, Katrina; Haakonsson, Jane E.; Hill, Arica; Horrocks, Julia A.; Mukhida, Farah; Providence, FitzGerald; Questel, Karl; Ramnanan, Naitram; Steele, Sophia; Vique Bosquet, Isabel M.; Knapp, Charles R. (7 May 2021). "Biosecurity for humanitarian aid". Science. 372 (6542): 581–582. Bibcode:2021Sci...372..581V. doi:10.1126/science.abj0449. eISSN   1095-9203. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   33958467. S2CID   233872896.
32. van den Burg, Matthijs P.; Brisbane, Jeanelle L. K.; Knapp, Charles R. (14 October 2019). "Post-hurricane relief facilitates invasion and establishment of two invasive alien vertebrate species in the Commonwealth of Dominica, West Indies". Biological Invasions. 22 (2): 195–203. doi:10.1007/s10530-019-02107-5. eISSN   1573-1464. ISSN   1387-3547. S2CID   204460134.
33. Gordon, R. D.; Vandenberg, N. (1991), "Field guide to recently introduced species of coccinellidae (Coleoptera) in North America, with a revised key to north American genera of coccinellini", Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 93: 845–867, archived from the original on 2017-05-25, retrieved 2017-05-10
34. "Summary by Species". Lost Ladybug Project. Archived from the original on 2017-05-03.
35. "Horse chestnut | The Wildlife Trusts". www.wildlifetrusts.org. Archived from the original on 2021-04-14. Retrieved 2021-04-14.
36. Trust, Woodland. "Horse Chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum)". Woodland Trust. Archived from the original on 2021-11-03. Retrieved 2021-04-14.
37. Dong, Bi-Cheng; Yang, Qiang; Kinlock, Nicole L.; Pouteau, Robin; Pyšek, Petr; Weigelt, Patrick; Yu, Fei-Hai; van Kleunen, Mark (April 2024). "Naturalization of introduced plants is driven by life-form-dependent cultivation biases". Diversity and Distributions. 30 (1): 55–70. doi: 10.1111/ddi.13788 . ISSN   1366-9516.
38. Kennedy, Kathryn (1992). A systematic study of the genus Phyla Lour. (Verbenaceae: Verbenoideae, Lantanae) (Thesis). The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved 2023-07-23.
39. Xu, Cheng-Yuan; Tang, Shaoqing; Fatemi, Mohammad; Gross, Caroline L.; Julien, Mic H.; Curtis, Caitlin; van Klinken, Rieks D. (2015-09-01). "Population structure and genetic diversity of invasive Phyla canescens: implications for the evolutionary potential". Ecosphere. 6 (9): art162. doi: 10.1890/ES14-00374.1 . ISSN   2150-8925.
40. Whalley, R. D. B.; Price, J. N.; Macdonald, M. J.; Berney, P. J. (2011). "Drivers of change in the Social-Ecological Systems of the Gwydir Wetlands and Macquarie Marshes in northern New South Wales, Australia". The Rangeland Journal. 33 (2): 109. doi:10.1071/rj11002.
41. Olivier, Louis; Galland, Jean-Paul; Maurin, Hervé (1995). Livre rouge de la flore menacée de France (PDF). Collection Patrimoines naturels. Vol. 1. Muséum national d'histoire naturelle. Paris: Muséum national d'histoire naturelle Conservatoire botanique national de Porquerolles Ministère de l'environnement. ISBN   978-2-86515-092-2.
42. Choudaj, K.; Wankhede, V. (2021). "Reduction in avian diversity due to exotic tree plantations on the native savannas of Pune city, India". Tropical Ecology. 62 (4): 499–507. Bibcode:2021TrEco..62..499C. doi:10.1007/s42965-021-00158-1.
43. Su, S.; Cassey, P.; Dyer, E. E.; Blackburn, T. M. (2017). "Geographical range expansion of alien birds and environmental matching". Ibis. 159 (1): 193–203. doi:10.1111/ibi.12418. hdl: 10019.1/121016 .
44. Lowe, Sarah (2000). "00 of the world's worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database". Auckland: Invasive Species Specialist Group. 12: 10.
45. Lundgren, E.J.; Ramp, D.; Rowan, J.; Middleton, O.; Schowanek, S.D.; Sanisidro, O.; Carroll, S.P.; Davis, M.; Sandom, C.J.; Svenning, J.-C.; Wallach, A.D. (2020). "Introduced herbivores restore Late Pleistocene ecological functions". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (14): 7871–7878. Bibcode:2020PNAS..117.7871L. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915769117 . PMC   7148574 . PMID   32205427. S2CID   214627869.
46. Rowan, J. (2020). "Pablo Escobar's hippos may help counteract a legacy of extinctions". U. Mass. Amherst. Archived from the original on 2020-03-28. Retrieved 2020-04-01.
47. Gippet, JMW; Bertelsmeier, C (2021). "Invasiveness is linked to greater commercial success in the global pet trade". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118 (14): 1–6. Bibcode:2021PNAS..11816337G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016337118 . PMC   8040636 . PMID   33753557.
48. Kotov, Alexey A.; Karabanov, Dmitry P.; Van Damme, Kay (2022-09-09). "Non-Indigenous Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda): From a Few Notorious Cases to a Potential Global Faunal Mixing in Aquatic Ecosystems". Water . 14 (18): 2806. doi: 10.3390/w14182806 . ISSN   2073-4441.
49. McGinnity, Philip; Prodöhl, Paulo; Ferguson, Andy; Hynes, Rosaleen; Maoiléidigh, Niall ó; Baker, Natalie; Cotter, Deirdre; O'Hea, Brendan; Cooke, Declan (2003-12-07). "Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 270 (1532): 2443–2450. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2520. ISSN   0962-8452. PMC   1691531 . PMID   14667333.
50. Fitzpatrick, Sarah W.; Gerberich, Jill C.; Angeloni, Lisa M.; Bailey, Larissa L.; Broder, Emily D.; Torres-Dowdall, Julian; Handelsman, Corey A.; López-Sepulcre, Andrés; Reznick, David N. (2016-08-01). "Gene flow from an adaptively divergent source causes rescue through genetic and demographic factors in two wild populations of Trinidadian guppies". Evolutionary Applications. 9 (7): 879–891. Bibcode:2016EvApp...9..879F. doi:10.1111/eva.12356. ISSN   1752-4571. PMC   4947150 . PMID   27468306.
51. Knapp, Charles R.; Grant, Tandora D.; Pasachnik, Stesha A.; Angin, Baptiste; Boman, Erik; Brisbane, Jeanelle; Buckner, Sandra D.; Haakonsson, Jane E.; Harlow, Peter S.; Mukhida, Farah; Thomas-Moko, Nunia; Burg, Matthijs P.; Wasilewski, Joseph A. (6 November 2020). "The global need to address threats from invasive alien iguanas". Animal Conservation. 24 (5): 717–719. doi: 10.1111/acv.12660 . eISSN   1469-1795. ISSN   1367-9430. S2CID   228838378.
52. Vuillaume, Barbara; Valette, Victorien; Lepais, Olivier; Grandjean, Frédéric; Breuil, Michel (5 June 2015). "Genetic Evidence of Hybridization between the Endangered Native Species Iguana delicatissima and the Invasive Iguana iguana (Reptilia, Iguanidae) in the Lesser Antilles: Management Implications". PLOS ONE. 10 (6): e0127575. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1027575V. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127575 . eISSN   1932-6203. PMC   4457794 . PMID   26046351.
53. Buswell, Joanna; Moles, Angela; Hartley, Stephen (2010). "Is rapid evolution common in introduced plant species?". Journal of Ecology. 99 (1): 214–224. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01759.x. S2CID   84013042.
54. "Assessment of Planetary Protection and Contamination Control Technologies for Future Planetary Science Missions" (PDF). Jet Propulsion Laboratory. January 24, 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-03-19.
    3.1.1 Microbial Reduction Methodologies:

    "This protocol was defined in concert with Viking, the first mission to face the most stringent planetary protection requirements; its implementation remains the gold standard today."

55. Lupisella, M.; Bleacher, J.; Lewis, R.; Dworkin, J.; Wright, M.; Burton, A.; Rubins, K.; Wallace, S.; Stahl, S.; John, K.; Archer, D.; Niles, P.; Regberg, A.; Smith, D.; Race, M. (2018-02-01). "Low-Latency Telerobotic Sample Return and Biomolecular Sequencing for Deep Space Gateway". Deep Space Gateway Concept Science Workshop. 2063: 3032. Bibcode:2018LPICo2063.3032L.

Further reading

• Chris D. Thomas (2017). Inheritors of the Earth: How Nature Is Thriving in an Age of Extinction. PublicAffairs. ISBN   978-1610397278.

External links

• National Estuarine and Marine Exotic Species Information System (NEMESIS)
• The Naked Scientists Invasive Species Articles Ecologists challenge the categories that identify some species as natives and others as invaders.