Prey switching

Last updated

Prey switching is frequency-dependent predation, where the predator preferentially consumes the most common type of prey. The phenomenon has also been described as apostatic selection, however the two terms are generally used to describe different parts of the same phenomenon. Apostatic selection has been used by authors looking at the differences between different genetic morphs. In comparison, prey switching has been used when describing the choice between different species. [1]

Contents

Definition

The term switching was first coined by the ecologist Murdoch in 1969 to describe the situation where a predator eats disproportionately more of the most common type of prey. [2] Eight years earlier in 1962 the geneticst B. C. Clarke described a similar phenomenon and called it "apostatic selection". [3] Since then the term prey switching has mainly been used by ecologists, while apostatic selection has been used by geneticists, and because of this they have been used to describe different aspects of frequency-dependent selection.

One of the ways prey switching has been identified and defined is when a predator's preference for a particular type of prey increases as the prey increase in abundance. The result is a strong preference for prey which are common in the environment and a weak preference for prey which are rare. The definition of preference will therefore impact on understanding switching. The most common definition of preference is the relationship between the ratio of prey in the environment and the ratio of prey in a predator's diet. It has been independently proposed a number of times and is described by the equation:

P1/P2 = c (N1/N2); alternatively, c = (P1/P2)/(N1/N2)

where N1 and N2 are the abundance of prey types 1 and 2 in the environment and P1 and P2 are the abundances of the same prey types in the predator's diet. c is the preference for prey type 1. If the value of c increases over time with N1/N2, prey switching is presumed to occur. The opposite of prey switching is when a predator eats disproportionately more of the most rare prey than would be expected by chance. From the equation above this would occur when c (preference) decreases over time as N1/N2 (amount in the environment) increases. This opposite phenomenon has been called negative prey switching, or anti-apostatic selection when it refers to the choice between different morphs. Negative prey switching may occur when the more plentiful prey is harder to hunt or riskier. [4]

Prey switching has been in the scientific literature since about 1960, but since his initial work Hassell has suggested that interest in prey switching has fallen since it is hard to demonstrate whether it has or is occurring. [5]

Mechanisms

The reason a consumer may switch from eating one resource, to eating another, is because it may increase an individual's foraging efficiency and therefore its inclusive fitness. [6] [7] It has been argued that frequency-dependent predation is predicted from optimal foraging theory. [8] In particular the contingency model predicts that in some circumstances the most profitable resource should be eaten at the expense of the less profitable resources, and that this decision is based on the absolute density of the most profitable type of resource. [9] However frequency-dependent predation can occur even when the absolute density of the most profitable resource remains constant. [10] These ultimate mechanisms help to demonstrate how prey switching and apostatic selection fit into overarching ecological theory. In addition there are proximate mechanisms which may account for why an individual preferentially feeds on the most abundant type of prey.

The location and timing of when a consumer feeds can account for switching behaviour. In experiments with Guppies the switching behaviour displayed was due to the choice of patch. [11] Likewise the switching behaviour of stoneflies was due to the time they were active. [12] The formation of a search image may also lead to the consumer switching which prey it eats. [6] Real suggests that a mechanism similar to search image may account for the switching behaviour displayed by Bombus pensylvanicus , however they are reluctant to use the term search image, instead suggesting some kind of perceptual constraint. [13] Prey switching may also occur if the consumer becomes more efficient at capturing the most common type of prey, for example increased practice at capturing the most common prey. [14] This was found to be the case for Anax junius which fed on either mayfly nymphs or tubifex worms. From this Bergelson came up with the rule of thumb that consumers should "continue to pursue only those prey types you have successfully captured in the immediate past." [14] Prey switching can alter the influence of predation on ecosystem function. For example, predators that switch between feeding on herbivores and detritivores can link green and brown food webs. [15]

In general there have been a limited number of studies which have identified mechanisms responsible for prey switching behaviour. However it has been suggested that a consumers choice of location to feed may be the most important mechanism. [10] Conversely, search image is controversial with disagreement over whether it actually occurs in nature, and if it does whether it is important. [1] [16]

Outcomes

If a predator displays prey switching behavior it can have a large effect on the stability of the system, coexistence of prey species and ecosystem functioning [15] and evolutionary diversification.

Prey switching can promote coexistence between prey species. [17] For example, prey switching causes predation to be very low for prey which are rare, which can subsequently create prey refugia which will aid coexistence. [18]

More generally than coexistence, prey switching has often been proposed to stabilise predator-prey dynamics.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theoretical ecology</span>

Theoretical ecology is the scientific discipline devoted to the study of ecological systems using theoretical methods such as simple conceptual models, mathematical models, computational simulations, and advanced data analysis. Effective models improve understanding of the natural world by revealing how the dynamics of species populations are often based on fundamental biological conditions and processes. Further, the field aims to unify a diverse range of empirical observations by assuming that common, mechanistic processes generate observable phenomena across species and ecological environments. Based on biologically realistic assumptions, theoretical ecologists are able to uncover novel, non-intuitive insights about natural processes. Theoretical results are often verified by empirical and observational studies, revealing the power of theoretical methods in both predicting and understanding the noisy, diverse biological world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predation</span> Biological interaction

Predation is a biological interaction where one organism, the predator, kills and eats another organism, its prey. It is one of a family of common feeding behaviours that includes parasitism and micropredation and parasitoidism. It is distinct from scavenging on dead prey, though many predators also scavenge; it overlaps with herbivory, as seed predators and destructive frugivores are predators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecological niche</span> Fit of a species living under specific environmental conditions

In ecology, a niche is the match of a species to a specific environmental condition. It describes how an organism or population responds to the distribution of resources and competitors and how it in turn alters those same factors. "The type and number of variables comprising the dimensions of an environmental niche vary from one species to another [and] the relative importance of particular environmental variables for a species may vary according to the geographic and biotic contexts".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foraging</span> Searching for wild food resources

Foraging is searching for wild food resources. It affects an animal's fitness because it plays an important role in an animal's ability to survive and reproduce. Foraging theory is a branch of behavioral ecology that studies the foraging behavior of animals in response to the environment where the animal lives.

Frequency-dependent selection is an evolutionary process by which the fitness of a phenotype or genotype depends on the phenotype or genotype composition of a given population.

Balancing selection refers to a number of selective processes by which multiple alleles are actively maintained in the gene pool of a population at frequencies larger than expected from genetic drift alone. Balancing selection is rare compared to purifying selection. It can occur by various mechanisms, in particular, when the heterozygotes for the alleles under consideration have a higher fitness than the homozygote. In this way genetic polymorphism is conserved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-predator adaptation</span> Defensive feature of prey for selective advantage

Anti-predator adaptations are mechanisms developed through evolution that assist prey organisms in their constant struggle against predators. Throughout the animal kingdom, adaptations have evolved for every stage of this struggle, namely by avoiding detection, warding off attack, fighting back, or escaping when caught.

Apostatic selection is a form of negative frequency-dependent selection. It describes the survival of individual prey animals that are different from their species in a way that makes it more likely for them to be ignored by their predators. It operates on polymorphic species, species which have different forms. In apostatic selection, the common forms of a species are preyed on more than the rarer forms, giving the rare forms a selective advantage in the population. It has also been discussed that apostatic selection acts to stabilize prey polymorphisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optimal foraging theory</span> Behavioral ecology model

Optimal foraging theory (OFT) is a behavioral ecology model that helps predict how an animal behaves when searching for food. Although obtaining food provides the animal with energy, searching for and capturing the food require both energy and time. To maximize fitness, an animal adopts a foraging strategy that provides the most benefit (energy) for the lowest cost, maximizing the net energy gained. OFT helps predict the best strategy that an animal can use to achieve this goal.

<i>Theridion grallator</i> Species of spider in the family Theridiidae

Theridion grallator, also known as the Hawaiian happy-face spider, is a spider in the family Theridiidae that resides on the Hawaiian Islands. T. grallator gets its vernacular name of "Hawaiian happy-face spider" from the unique patterns superimposed on its abdomen, specifically those that resemble a smiley face. T. grallator is particularly notable because of its wide range of polymorphisms that may be studied to allow a better understanding of evolutionary mechanisms. In addition to the variety of color polymorphisms present, T. grallator demonstrates the interesting quality of diet-induced color change, in which its appearance temporarily changes as it metabolizes various food items.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Functional response</span> Ecological concept; intake rate of a consumer as a function of food density

A functional response in ecology is the intake rate of a consumer as a function of food density. It is associated with the numerical response, which is the reproduction rate of a consumer as a function of food density. Following C. S. Holling, functional responses are generally classified into three types, which are called Holling's type I, II, and III.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predator satiation</span> Anti-predator adaption

Predator satiation is an anti-predator adaptation in which prey briefly occur at high population densities, reducing the probability of an individual organism being eaten. When predators are flooded with potential prey, they can consume only a certain amount, so by occurring at high densities prey benefit from a safety in numbers effect. This strategy has evolved in a diverse range of prey, including notably many species of plants, insects, and fish. Predator satiation can be considered a type of refuge from predators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shoaling and schooling</span> In biology, any group of fish that stay together for social reasons

In biology, any group of fish that stay together for social reasons are shoaling, and if the group is swimming in the same direction in a coordinated manner, they are schooling. In common usage, the terms are sometimes used rather loosely. About one quarter of fish species shoal all their lives, and about one half shoal for part of their lives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guppy</span> Species of tropical fish

The guppy, also known as millionfish or the rainbow fish, is one of the world's most widely distributed tropical fish and one of the most popular freshwater aquarium fish species. It is a member of the family Poeciliidae and, like almost all American members of the family, is live-bearing. Guppies originate from northeast South America, but have been introduced to many environments and are now found all over the world. They are highly adaptable and thrive in many different environmental and ecological conditions. Male guppies, which are smaller than females, have ornamental caudal and dorsal fins. Wild guppies generally feed on a variety of food sources, including benthic algae and aquatic insect larvae. Guppies are used as a model organism in the fields of ecology, evolution, and behavioural studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frequency-dependent foraging by pollinators</span> Animal behavior

Frequency-dependent foraging is defined as the tendency of an individual to selectively forage on a certain species or morph based on its relative frequency within a population. Specifically for pollinators, this refers to the tendency to visit a particular floral morph or plant species based on its frequency within the local plant community, even if nectar rewards are equivalent amongst different morphs. Pollinators that forage in a frequency-dependent manner will exhibit flower constancy for a certain morph, but the preferred floral type will be dependent on its frequency. Additionally, frequency-dependent foraging differs from density-dependent foraging as the latter considers the absolute number of certain morphs per unit area as a factor influencing pollinator choice. Although density of a morph will be related to its frequency, common morphs are still preferred when overall plant densities are high.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coexistence theory</span> Framework explaining how competitor traits can maintain species diversity

Coexistence theory is a framework to understand how competitor traits can maintain species diversity and stave-off competitive exclusion even among similar species living in ecologically similar environments. Coexistence theory explains the stable coexistence of species as an interaction between two opposing forces: fitness differences between species, which should drive the best-adapted species to exclude others within a particular ecological niche, and stabilizing mechanisms, which maintains diversity via niche differentiation. For many species to be stabilized in a community, population growth must be negative density-dependent, i.e. all participating species have a tendency to increase in density as their populations decline. In such communities, any species that becomes rare will experience positive growth, pushing its population to recover and making local extinction unlikely. As the population of one species declines, individuals of that species tend to compete predominantly with individuals of other species. Thus, the tendency of a population to recover as it declines in density reflects reduced intraspecific competition (within-species) relative to interspecific competition (between-species), the signature of niche differentiation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pursuit predation</span> Hunting strategy by some predators

Pursuit predation is a form of predation in which predators actively give chase to their prey, either solitarily or as a group. It is an alternate predation strategy to ambush predation — pursuit predators rely on superior speed, endurance and/or teamwork to seize the prey, while ambush predators use concealment, luring, exploiting of surroundings and the element of surprise to capture the prey. While the two patterns of predation are not mutually exclusive, morphological differences in an organism's body plan can create an evolutionary bias favoring either type of predation.

The predation risk allocation hypothesis attempts to explain how and why animals' behaviour and foraging strategies differ in various predatory situations, depending on their risk of endangerment. The hypothesis suggests that an animal's alertness and attention, along with its willingness to hunt for food, will change depending on the risk factors within that animal's environment and the presence of predators that could attack. The model assumes there are different levels of risk factors within various environments and prey animals will behave more cautiously when they are found in high-risk environments. The overall effectiveness of the model for predicting animal behaviour varies, therefore, its results are dependent on the prey species used in the model and how their behaviour changes. There are several reasons the predation risk allocation hypothesis was developed to observe how animal behaviour varies depending on its risk factors. Mixed results have been found for the model's effectiveness in predicting predator defensive behaviour for various species.

Gerris buenoi is a species of water strider that belongs to the family Gerridae. It was first identified in 1911 and is native to continental USA and Canada. Individuals of this species are small in size and have modified appendages, allowing them to float and "skate" along the surface of the water. G. buenoi can be found near the shoreline of freshwater ponds and small lakes, where they hunt for terrestrial insects that have fallen into the water.

Dietary conservatism is a foraging strategy in which individuals show a prolonged reluctance to eat novel foods, even after neophobia has been overcome. Within any given population of foragers, some will be conservative and some will be adventurous, an alternative strategy in which individuals readily accept novel food immediately after neophobia has waned. Dietary conservatism and neophobia are however distinct processes, distinguished by the persistence of an individual's reluctance to eat over repeated encounters with novel food and over long time periods.

References

  1. 1 2 Allen, J. A. (1988-07-06). "Frequency-dependent selection by predators". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 319 (1196): 485–503. doi:10.1098/rstb.1988.0061. ISSN   0962-8436. PMID   2905488.
  2. ↑ Murdoch, William W. (September 1969). "Switching in General Predators: Experiments on Predator Specificity and Stability of Prey Populations". Ecological Monographs. 39 (4): 335–354. doi:10.2307/1942352. ISSN   0012-9615. JSTOR   1942352.
  3. ↑ Clarke, B.C. (1962) Balanced polymorphism and the diversity of sympatric species. In Taxonomy and Geography (Nichols, D., ed), pp. 47-70, Oxford: Systematics Association Publication
  4. ↑ Tallian, Aimee; et al. (10 April 2017). "Predator foraging response to a resurgent dangerous prey". Functional Ecology. 31 (7): 1418–1429. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12866 .
  5. ↑ Hassell, Michael P. (Michael Patrick) (2000). The spatial and temporal dynamics of host-parasitoid interactions. Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-854089-2.
  6. 1 2 Hughes, R.N.; Croy, M.I. (April 1993). "An Experimental Analysis of Frequency-Dependent Predation (Switching) in the 15-Spined Stickleback, Spinachia spinachia". The Journal of Animal Ecology. 62 (2): 341. doi:10.2307/5365. JSTOR   5365.
  7. ↑ Cornell, Howard (March 1976). "Search Strategies and the Adaptive Significance of Switching in Some General Predators". The American Naturalist. 110 (972): 317–320. doi:10.1086/283068. ISSN   0003-0147.
  8. ↑ Hubbard, S. F.; Cook, R. M.; Glover, J. G.; Greenwood, J.J.D. (June 1982). "Apostatic Selection as an Optimal Foraging Strategy". The Journal of Animal Ecology. 51 (2): 625. doi:10.2307/3987. JSTOR   3987.
  9. ↑ Stephens, David W.; Krebs, J. R.; Krebs, John R. (1986). Foraging theory. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0-691-08442-8.
  10. 1 2 Sherratt, T (February 1993). "Frequency-dependent food selection by arthropods: a review". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 48 (2): 167–186. doi:10.1006/bijl.1993.1013.
  11. ↑ Murdoch, William W.; Avery, S.; Smyth, Michael E. B. (August 1975). "Switching in Predatory Fish". Ecology. 56 (5): 1094–1105. doi:10.2307/1936149. JSTOR   1936149.
  12. ↑ Elliott, J. M. (June 2004). "Prey switching in four species of carnivorous stoneflies". Freshwater Biology. 49 (6): 709–720. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01222.x. ISSN   0046-5070.
  13. ↑ Real, L.A (1990), "Predator switching and the interpretation of animal choice behavior: the case for constrained optimization", in Hughes, Roger N (ed.), Behavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection, New York & Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 1–21, ISBN   978-0-387-51762-9
  14. 1 2 Bergelson, Joy M. (December 1985). "A Mechanistic Interpretation of Prey Selection by Anax junius Larvae (Odonata: Aeschnidae)". Ecology. 66 (6): 1699–1705. doi:10.2307/2937365. JSTOR   2937365.
  15. 1 2 Hines, Jes; Gessner, Mark O. (November 2012). "Consumer trophic diversity as a fundamental mechanism linking predation and ecosystem functioning". Journal of Animal Ecology. 81 (6): 1146–1153. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02003.x. ISSN   0021-8790.
  16. ↑ Lawrence, E. Simon; Allen, John A. (February 1983). "On the Term 'Search Image'". Oikos. 40 (2): 313. doi:10.2307/3544597. JSTOR   3544597.
  17. ↑ Abrams, Peter A.; Matsuda, Hiroyuki (December 2003). "Population dynamical consequences of reduced predator switching at low total prey densities". Population Ecology. 45 (3): 175–185. doi:10.1007/s10144-003-0159-3. ISSN   1438-3896.
  18. ↑ Gentleman, Wendy; Leising, Andrew; Frost, Bruce; Strom, Suzanne; Murray, James (November 2003). "Functional responses for zooplankton feeding on multiple resources: a review of assumptions and biological dynamics". Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 50 (22–26): 2847–2875. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2003.07.001.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.