Kelp forest

Last updated
Kelp forest Kelp forest.jpg
Kelp forest

Kelp forests are underwater areas with a high density of kelp, which covers a large part of the world's coastlines. Smaller areas of anchored kelp are called kelp beds. They are recognized as one of the most productive and dynamic ecosystems on Earth. [1] [2] Although algal kelp forest combined with coral reefs only cover 0.1% of Earth's total surface, they account for 0.9% of global primary productivity. [3] Kelp forests occur worldwide throughout temperate and polar coastal oceans. [1] In 2007, kelp forests were also discovered in tropical waters near Ecuador. [4]

Contents

Global distribution of kelp forests Kelp forest distribution map.png
Global distribution of kelp forests

"I can only compare these great aquatic forests ... with the terrestrial ones in the intertropical regions. Yet if in any country a forest was destroyed, I do not believe so nearly so many species of animals would perish as would here, from the destruction of kelp. Amidst the leaves of this plant numerous species of fish live, which nowhere else could find food or shelter; with their destruction the many cormorants and other fishing birds, the otters, seals and porpoise, would soon perish also; and lastly, the Fuegian[s] ... would ... decrease in numbers and perhaps cease to exist.

Charles Darwin, 1 June 1834, Tierra del Fuego, Chile [5]
A kelp forest at Cojo Anchorage near Point Conception, California. Kelp forest Cojo Anchorage.PNG
A kelp forest at Cojo Anchorage near Point Conception, California.

Physically formed by brown macroalgae, kelp forests provide a unique habitat for marine organisms [6] and are a source for understanding many ecological processes. Over the last century, they have been the focus of extensive research, particularly in trophic ecology, and continue to provoke important ideas that are relevant beyond this unique ecosystem. For example, kelp forests can influence coastal oceanographic patterns [7] and provide many ecosystem services. [8]

However, the influence of humans has often contributed to kelp forest degradation. Of particular concern are the effects of overfishing nearshore ecosystems, which can release herbivores from their normal population regulation and result in the overgrazing of kelp and other algae. [9] This can rapidly result in transitions to barren landscapes where relatively few species persist. [10] [11] Already due to the combined effects of overfishing and climate change, [12] kelp forests have all but disappeared in many especially vulnerable places, such as Tasmania's east coast and the coast of Northern California. [13] [14] The implementation of marine protected areas is one management strategy useful for addressing such issues, since it may limit the impacts of fishing and buffer the ecosystem from additive effects of other environmental stressors.

Kelp

The term kelp refers to marine algae belonging to the order Laminariales (phylum: Ochrophyta). Though not considered a taxonomically diverse order, kelps are highly diverse structurally and functionally. [8] The most widely recognized species are the giant kelps ( Macrocystis spp.), although numerous other genera such as Laminaria , Ecklonia , Lessonia , Nereocystis , Alaria , and Eisenia are described.

A wide range of sea life uses kelp forests for protection or food, including fish. In the North Pacific kelp forests, particularly rockfish, and many invertebrates, such as amphipods, shrimp, marine snails, bristle worms, and brittle stars. Many marine mammals and birds are also found, including seals, sea lions, whales, sea otters, gulls, terns, snowy egrets, great blue herons, and cormorants, as well as some shore birds. [15]

Frequently considered an ecosystem engineer, kelp provides a physical substrate and habitat for kelp forest communities. [16] In algae (kingdom Protista), the body of an individual organism is known as a thallus rather than as a plant (kingdom Plantae). The morphological structure of a kelp thallus is defined by three basic structural units: [10]

In addition, many kelp species have pneumatocysts, or gas-filled bladders, usually located at the base of fronds near the stipe. These structures provide the necessary buoyancy for kelp to maintain an upright position in the water column.

The environmental factors necessary for kelp to survive include hard substrate (usually rock or sand), high nutrients (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus), and light (minimum annual irradiance dose > 50 E m−2 [17] ). Especially productive kelp forests tend to be associated with areas of significant oceanographic upwelling, a process that delivers cool, nutrient-rich water from depth to the ocean's mixed surface layer. [17] Water flow and turbulence facilitate nutrient assimilation across kelp fronds throughout the water column. [18] Water clarity affects the depth to which sufficient light can be transmitted. In ideal conditions, giant kelp (Macrocystis spp.) can grow as much as 30–60 cm vertically per day. Some species, such as Nereocystis, are annuals, while others such as Eisenia are perennials, living for more than 20 years. [19] In perennial kelp forests, maximum growth rates occur during upwelling months (typically spring and summer) and die-backs correspond to reduced nutrient availability, shorter photoperiods, and increased storm frequency. [10]

Kelps are primarily associated with temperate and arctic waters worldwide. Of the more dominant genera, Laminaria is mainly associated with both sides of the Atlantic Ocean and the coasts of China and Japan; Ecklonia is found in Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa; and Macrocystis occurs throughout the northeastern and southeastern Pacific Ocean, Southern Ocean archipelagos, and in patches around Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. [10] The region with the greatest diversity of kelps (>20 species) is the northeastern Pacific, from north of San Francisco, California, to the Aleutian Islands, Alaska.

Although kelp forests are unknown in tropical surface waters, a few species of Laminaria have been known to occur exclusively in tropical deep waters. [20] [21] This general absence of kelp from the tropics is believed to be mostly due to insufficient nutrient levels associated with warm, oligotrophic waters. [10] One recent study spatially overlaid the requisite physical parameters for kelp with mean oceanographic conditions and produced a model predicting the existence of subsurface kelps throughout the tropics worldwide to depths of 200 m (660 ft). For a hotspot in the Galapagos Islands, the local model was improved with fine-scale data and tested; the research team found thriving kelp forests in all eight of their sampled sites, all of which had been predicted by the model, thus validating their approach. This suggests that their global model might actually be fairly accurate, and if so, kelp forests would be prolific in tropical subsurface waters worldwide. [4] The importance of this contribution has been rapidly acknowledged within the scientific community and has prompted an entirely new trajectory of kelp forest research, highlighting the potential for kelp forests to provide marine organisms spatial refuge under climate change and providing possible explanations for evolutionary patterns of kelps worldwide. [22]

Ecosystem architecture

Rockfish swimming around giant kelp Rockfish around kelp Monterey Bay Aquarium.jpg
Rockfish swimming around giant kelp
A diver in a kelp forest off the coast of California Diver in kelp forest.jpg
A diver in a kelp forest off the coast of California
A kelp forest off of the coast of Anacapa Island, California Kelp Forest off of Anacapa Island California.jpg
A kelp forest off of the coast of Anacapa Island, California
Giant kelp uses gas-filled floats to keep the thallus suspended, allowing the kelp blades near the ocean surface to capture light for photosynthesis. Giantkelp2 300.jpg
Giant kelp uses gas-filled floats to keep the thallus suspended, allowing the kelp blades near the ocean surface to capture light for photosynthesis.

The architecture of a kelp forest ecosystem is based on its physical structure, which influences the associated species that define its community structure. Structurally, the ecosystem includes three guilds of kelp and two guilds occupied by other algae: [10]

Multiple kelp species often co-exist within a forest; the term understory canopy refers to the stipitate and prostrate kelps. For example, a Macrocystis canopy may extend many meters above the seafloor towards the ocean surface, while an understory of the kelps Eisenia and Pterygophora reaches upward only a few meters. Beneath these kelps, a benthic assemblage of foliose red algae may occur. The dense vertical infrastructure with overlying canopy forms a system of microenvironments similar to those observed in a terrestrial forest, with a sunny canopy region, a partially shaded middle, and darkened seafloor. [10] Each guild has associated organisms, which vary in their levels of dependence on the habitat, and the assemblage of these organisms can vary with kelp morphologies. [23] [24] [25] For example, in California, Macrocystis pyrifera forests, the nudibranch Melibe leonina , and skeleton shrimp Caprella californica are closely associated with surface canopies; the kelp perch Brachyistius frenatus, rockfish Sebastes spp., and many other fishes are found within the stipitate understory; brittle stars and turban snails Tegula spp. are closely associated with the kelp holdfast, while various herbivores, such as sea urchins and abalone, live under the prostrate canopy; many seastars, hydroids, and benthic fishes live among the benthic assemblages; solitary corals, various gastropods, and echinoderms live over the encrusting coralline algae. [23] In addition, pelagic fishes and marine mammals are loosely associated with kelp forests, usually interacting near the edges as they visit to feed on resident organisms.

Trophic ecology

Sea urchins like this purple sea urchin can damage kelp forests by chewing through kelp holdfasts Seaurchin 300.jpg
Sea urchins like this purple sea urchin can damage kelp forests by chewing through kelp holdfasts
The sea otter is an important predator of sea urchins Mother sea otter with rare twin baby pups (9137174915).jpg
The sea otter is an important predator of sea urchins
The jeweled top snail Calliostoma annulatum grazing on a blade of giant kelp Calliostoma annulatum.jpg
The jeweled top snail Calliostoma annulatum grazing on a blade of giant kelp

Classic studies in kelp forest ecology have largely focused on trophic interactions (the relationships between organisms and their food webs), particularly the understanding and top-down trophic processes. Bottom-up processes are generally driven by the abiotic conditions required for primary producers to grow, such as availability of light and nutrients, and the subsequent transfer of energy to consumers at higher trophic levels. For example, the occurrence of kelp is frequently correlated with oceanographic upwelling zones, which provide unusually high concentrations of nutrients to the local environment. [26] [27] This allows kelp to grow and subsequently support herbivores, which in turn support consumers at higher trophic levels. [28] By contrast, in top-down processes, predators limit the biomass of species at lower trophic levels through consumption. In the absence of predation, these lower-level species flourish because resources that support their energetic requirements are not limiting. In a well-studied example from Alaskan kelp forests, [29] sea otters (Enhydra lutris) control populations of herbivorous sea urchins through predation. When sea otters are removed from the ecosystem (for example, by human exploitation), urchin populations are released from predatory control and grow dramatically. This leads to increased herbivore pressure on local kelp stands. Deterioration of the kelp itself results in the loss of physical ecosystem structure and subsequently, the loss of other species associated with this habitat. In Alaskan kelp forest ecosystems, sea otters are the keystone species that mediates this trophic cascade. In Southern California, kelp forests persist without sea otters and the control of herbivorous urchins is instead mediated by a suite of predators including lobsters and large fishes, such as the California sheephead. The effect of removing one predatory species in this system differs from Alaska because redundancy exists in the trophic levels and other predatory species can continue to regulate urchins. [24] However, the removal of multiple predators can effectively release urchins from predator pressure and allow the system to follow trajectories towards kelp forest degradation. [30] Similar examples exist in Nova Scotia, [31] South Africa, [32] Australia, [33] and Chile. [34] The relative importance of top-down versus bottom-up control in kelp forest ecosystems and the strengths of trophic interactions continue to be the subject of considerable scientific investigation. [35] [36] [37]

The transition from macroalgal (i.e. kelp forest) to denuded landscapes dominated by sea urchins (or ‘urchin barrens’) is a widespread phenomenon, [8] [38] [39] [40] [41] often resulting from trophic cascades like those described above; the two phases are regarded as alternative stable states of the ecosystem. [42] [43] [44] The recovery of kelp forests from barren states has been documented following dramatic perturbations, such as urchin disease or large shifts in thermal conditions. [30] [45] [46] Recovery from intermediate states of deterioration is less predictable and depends on a combination of abiotic factors and biotic interactions in each case.

Though urchins are usually the dominant herbivores, others with significant interaction strengths include seastars, isopods, kelp crabs, and herbivorous fishes. [10] [35] In many cases, these organisms feed on kelp that has been dislodged from substrate and drifts near the ocean floor rather than expend energy searching for intact thalli on which to feed. When sufficient drift kelp is available, herbivorous grazers do not exert pressure on attached thalli; when drift subsidies are unavailable, grazers directly impact the physical structure of the ecosystem. [47] [48] Many studies in Southern California have demonstrated that the availability of drift kelp specifically influences the foraging behavior of sea urchins. [49] [50] Drift kelp and kelp-derived particulate matter have also been important in subsidizing adjacent habitats, such as sandy beaches and the rocky intertidal. [51] [52] [53]

Patch dynamics

Another major area of kelp forest research has been directed at understanding the spatial-temporal patterns of kelp patches. Not only do such dynamics affect the physical landscape, but they also affect species that associate with kelp for refuge or foraging activities. [23] [28] Large-scale environmental disturbances have offered important insights concerning mechanisms and ecosystem resilience. Examples of environmental disturbances include:

In addition to ecological monitoring of kelp forests before, during, and after such disturbances, scientists try to tease apart the intricacies of kelp forest dynamics using experimental manipulations. By working on smaller spatial-temporal scales, they can control for the presence or absence of specific biotic and abiotic factors to discover the operative mechanisms. For example, in southern Australia, manipulations of kelp canopy types demonstrated that the relative amount of Ecklonia radiata in a canopy could be used to predict understory species assemblages; consequently, the proportion of E. radiata can be used as an indicator of other species occurring in the environment. [64]

Human use

A diver measures kelp growth A diver records kelp growth (9296).jpg
A diver measures kelp growth

Kelp forests have been important to human existence for thousands of years. [65] Indeed, many now theorise that the first colonisation of the Americas was due to fishing communities following the Pacific kelp forests during the last ice age. One theory contends that the kelp forests that would have stretched from northeast Asia to the American Pacific coast would have provided many benefits to ancient boaters [66] The kelp forests would have provided many sustenance opportunities, as well as acting as a type of buffer from rough water. Besides these benefits, researchers believe that the kelp forests might have helped early boaters navigate, acting as a type of "kelp highway". Theorists also suggest that the kelp forests would have helped these ancient colonists by providing a stable way of life and preventing them from having to adapt to new ecosystems and develop new survival methods even as they traveled thousands of miles. [67]

Modern economies are based on fisheries of kelp-associated species such as lobster and rockfish. Humans can also harvest kelp directly to feed aquaculture species such as abalone and to extract the compound alginic acid, which is used in products like toothpaste and antacids. [68] [69] Kelp forests are valued for recreational activities such as SCUBA diving and kayaking; the industries that support these sports represent one benefit related to the ecosystem and the enjoyment derived from these activities represents another. All of these are examples of ecosystem services provided specifically by kelp forests. The Monterey Bay aquarium was the first aquarium [70] to exhibit an alive kelp forest.

As carbon sequesters

Kelp forests grow in rocky places along the shore that are constantly eroding carrying material out to the deep sea. The kelp then sinks to the ocean floor and store the carbon where is it unlikely to be disturbed by human activity. [71] Researchers from the University of Western Australia estimated kelp forest around Australia sequestered 1.3-2.8 teragrams of carbon per year which is 27–34% of the total annual blue carbon sequestered in the Australian continent by tidal marshes, mangrove forests and seagrass beds. [72] Every year 200 million tons of carbon dioxide are being sequestered by macroalgae such as kelp. [73]

Threats and management

The nudibranch Melibe leonina on a Macrocystis frond (California): Marine protected areas are one way to guard kelp forests as an ecosystem. Melibe.2.jpg
The nudibranch Melibe leonina on a Macrocystis frond (California): Marine protected areas are one way to guard kelp forests as an ecosystem.

Given the complexity of kelp forests – their variable structure, geography, and interactions – they pose a considerable challenge to environmental managers. Extrapolating even well-studied trends to the future is difficult because interactions within the ecosystem will change under variable conditions, not all relationships in the ecosystem are understood, and the nonlinear thresholds to transitions are not yet recognized. [74]

Major issues of concern include marine pollution and water quality, kelp harvesting and fisheries, invasive species, [8] and climate change. [75] The most pressing threat to kelp forest preservation may be the overfishing of coastal ecosystems, which by removing higher trophic levels facilitates their shift to depauperate urchin barrens. [9] The maintenance of biodiversity is recognized as a way of generally stabilizing ecosystems and their services through mechanisms such as functional compensation and reduced susceptibility to foreign species invasions. [76] [77] [78] [79] More recently, the 2022 IPCC report states that kelp and other seaweeds in most regions are undergoing mass mortalities from high temperature extremes and range shifts from warming, as they are stationary and cannot adapt quick enough to deal with the rapidly increasing temperature of the Earth and thus, the ocean. [80]

In many places, managers have opted to regulate the harvest of kelp [27] [81] and/or the taking of kelp forest species by fisheries. [8] [63] While these may be effective in one sense, they do not necessarily protect the entirety of the ecosystem. Marine protected areas (MPAs) offer a unique solution that encompasses not only target species for harvesting, but also the interactions surrounding them and the local environment as a whole. [82] [83] Direct benefits of MPAs to fisheries (for example, spillover effects) have been well documented around the world. [9] [84] [85] [86] Indirect benefits have also been shown for several cases among species such as abalone and fishes in Central California. [87] [88] Most importantly, MPAs can be effective at protecting existing kelp forest ecosystems and may also allow for the regeneration of those that have been affected. [42] [89] [90]

Kelp forest restoration in California

Fish swarming through a kelp forest Fish swarm through the kelp forest.jpg
Fish swarming through a kelp forest

In the 2010s, Northern California lost 95% of its kelp ecosystems due to marine heatwaves. [91] [92] [93] [94]

Kelp bed recovery efforts in California are primarily focusing on sea urchin removal, [95] both by scuba divers, [96] and by sea otters, which are natural predators. [97] [98] [99] [100] [101]

A brown alga, Sargassum horneri , an invasive species first spotted in 2003, has also been a concern. [102] [103]

The Sunflower sea star is an important keystone species which helps control sea urchin abundance, but an outbreak of Sea star wasting disease and a vulnerability to climate change has led to its critical endangerment. [104]

Researchers at the Bodega Marine Laboratory of UC Davis are developing replanting strategies, and volunteers of the Orange County Coastkeeper group are replanting giant kelp. [105] [106] Humboldt State University began cultivating bull kelp in its research farm in 2021. [107]

Research efforts at the state level to prevent kelp forest collapse in California were announced in July 2020. [108]

At the federal level, H.R. 4458, the Keeping Ecosystems Living and Productive (KELP) Act, introduced July 29, 2021, seeks to establish a new grant program within NOAA for kelp forest restoration. [109]

Ocean Rainforest, a Faroe Islands-based company, secured $4.5 million in U.S. government funding to grow giant kelp on an 86-acre farm off the coast of Santa Barbara, California. [110]

Global conservation efforts

The United Nations Environment Programme Norwegian Blue Forests Network 2023 report titled 'Into the Blue: Securing a Sustainable Future for Kelp Forests' documents a global decline in kelp forests, with an annual reduction rate of 1.8%. Over the past 50 years, 40–60% of these ecosystems have degraded due to factors such as climate change, poor water quality, and overfishing. The report underscores the urgency of implementing global conservation efforts and emphasizes the need for international cooperation to adopt area-based management strategies. These strategies aim to mitigate the aforementioned impacts and enhance the resilience and sustainability of kelp forests. [111]

Kelp forest restoration, practiced in 16 countries over 300 years, has gained momentum, particularly from 2009 to 2019, involving diverse societal sectors such as academia, governments, and businesses. Large-scale restoration successes demonstrate its feasibility, with the best outcomes often near existing kelp forests, emphasizing the importance of preventing their decline. However, challenges persist, including the need for cost-effective methods, funding mechanisms, and adaptations to climate change. This restoration work not only supports ecological recovery but also offers significant social and economic benefits, aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and underscores the importance of multi-sector collaboration. [111] :135

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Overgrazing</span> When plants are grazed for extended periods without sufficient recovery time

Overgrazing occurs when plants are exposed to intensive grazing for extended periods of time, or without sufficient recovery periods. It can be caused by either livestock in poorly managed agricultural applications, game reserves, or nature reserves. It can also be caused by immobile, travel restricted populations of native or non-native wild animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kelp</span> Large brown seaweeds in the order Laminariales

Kelps are large brown algae or seaweeds that make up the order Laminariales. There are about 30 different genera. Despite its appearance, kelp is not a plant but a stramenopile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Keystone species</span> Species with a large effect on its environment

A keystone species is a species that has a disproportionately large effect on its natural environment relative to its abundance. The concept was introduced in 1969 by the zoologist Robert T. Paine. Keystone species play a critical role in maintaining the structure of an ecological community, affecting many other organisms in an ecosystem and helping to determine the types and numbers of various other species in the community. Without keystone species, the ecosystem would be dramatically different or cease to exist altogether. Some keystone species, such as the wolf and lion, are also apex predators.

<i>Nereocystis</i> Genus of kelp

Nereocystis is a monotypic genus of subtidal kelp containing the species Nereocystis luetkeana. Some English names include edible kelp, bull kelp, bullwhip kelp, ribbon kelp, bladder wrack, and variations of these names. Due to the English name, bull kelp can be confused with southern bull kelps, which are found in the Southern Hemisphere. Nereocystis luetkeana forms thick beds on subtidal rocks, and is an important part of kelp forests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Red sea urchin</span> Species of echinoderm

The red sea urchin is a sea urchin found in the northeastern Pacific Ocean from Alaska to Baja California. It lives in shallow waters from the low-tide line to greater than 280 m (920 ft) deep, and is typically found on rocky shores sheltered from extreme wave action in areas where kelp is available.

<i>Macrocystis</i> Genus of large brown algae

Macrocystis is a monospecific genus of kelp with all species now synonymous with Macrocystis pyrifera. It is commonly known as giant kelp or bladder kelp. This genus contains the largest of all the Phaeophyceae or brown algae. Macrocystis has pneumatocysts at the base of its blades. Sporophytes are perennial and the individual may live for up to three years; stipes/fronds within a whole individual undergo senescence, where each frond may persist for approximately 100 days. The genus is found widely in subtropical, temperate, and sub-Antarctic oceans of the Southern Hemisphere and in the northeast Pacific. Macrocystis is often a major component of temperate kelp forests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California sheephead</span> Species of fish

The California sheephead is a species of wrasse native to the eastern Pacific Ocean. Its range is from Monterey Bay, California, to the Gulf of California, Mexico. It can live for up to 20 years in favorable conditions and can reach a size of up to 91 cm (3 ft) and a weight of 16 kg (35 lb). It is carnivorous, living in rocky reef and kelp bed habitats, feeding primarily on sea urchins, molluscs, and crustaceans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urchin barren</span> Shallow ocean area with destructive grazing of kelp forests

An urchin barren is commonly defined as an urchin-dominated area with little or no kelp. Urchin grazing pressure on kelp is a direct and observable cause of a "barren" area. However, determining which factors contribute to shifting a kelp bed to an urchin barren is a complex problem and remains a matter of debate among scientists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kina (animal)</span> Species of sea urchin

Kina is a sea urchin endemic to New Zealand. This echinoderm belongs to the family Echinometridae and it can reach a maximum diameter of 16–17 cm.

Trophic cascades are powerful indirect interactions that can control entire ecosystems, occurring when a trophic level in a food web is suppressed. For example, a top-down cascade will occur if predators are effective enough in predation to reduce the abundance, or alter the behavior of their prey, thereby releasing the next lower trophic level from predation.

<i>Strongylocentrotus purpuratus</i> Species of sea urchin

Strongylocentrotus purpuratus is a species of sea urchin in the family Strongylocentrotidae commonly known as the purple sea urchin. It lives along the eastern edge of the Pacific Ocean extending from Ensenada, Mexico, to British Columbia, Canada. This sea urchin species is deep purple in color, and lives in lower inter-tidal and nearshore sub-tidal communities. Its eggs are orange when secreted in water. January, February, and March function as the typical active reproductive months for the species. Sexual maturity is reached around two years. It normally grows to a diameter of about 10 cm (4 inches) and may live as long as 70 years.

<i>Corynactis californica</i> Species of sea anemone

Corynactis californica is a brightly colored colonial anthozoan corallimorph. Unlike the Atlantic true sea anemone, Actinia fragacea, that bears the same common name, strawberry anemone, this species is a member of the order Corallimorpharia, and is the only member found on the west coast of North America. Other common names include club-tipped anemone and strawberry corallimorpharian. The anemone can live up to at least 50 meters (164 ft) deep on vertical rock walls, and at the bottom of kelp forests. It is known to carpet the bottom of some areas, like Campbell River in British Columbia, and Monterey Bay in California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seaweed</span> Macroscopic marine algae

Seaweed, or macroalgae, refers to thousands of species of macroscopic, multicellular, marine algae. The term includes some types of Rhodophyta (red), Phaeophyta (brown) and Chlorophyta (green) macroalgae. Seaweed species such as kelps provide essential nursery habitat for fisheries and other marine species and thus protect food sources; other species, such as planktonic algae, play a vital role in capturing carbon and producing at least 50% of Earth's oxygen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Overexploitation</span> Depleting a renewable resource

Overexploitation, also called overharvesting or ecological overshoot, refers to harvesting a renewable resource to the point of diminishing returns. Continued overexploitation can lead to the destruction of the resource, as it will be unable to replenish. The term applies to natural resources such as water aquifers, grazing pastures and forests, wild medicinal plants, fish stocks and other wildlife.

A food chain is a linear network of links in a food web, often starting with an autotroph, also called a producer, and typically ending at an apex predator, detritivore, or decomposer. It is not the same as a food web. A food chain depicts relations between species based on what they consume for energy in trophic levels, and they are most commonly quantified in length: the number of links between a trophic consumer and the base of the chain.

<i>Pterygophora californica</i> Species of kelp

Pterygophora californica is a large species of kelp, commonly known as stalked kelp. It is the only species in its genus Pterygophora. It grows in shallow water on the Pacific coast of North America where it forms part of a biodiverse community in a "kelp forest". It is sometimes also referred to as woody-stemmed kelp, walking kelp, or winged kelp.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquaculture of giant kelp</span> Cultivation of seaweed

Aquaculture of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, is the cultivation of kelp for uses such as food, dietary supplements or potash. Giant kelp contains iodine, potassium, other minerals vitamins and carbohydrates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Southern Reef</span> Australian reef system

The Great Southern Reef is a system of interconnected reefs that spans the southern coast of continental Australia and Tasmania and extends as far north as Brisbane to the east and Kalbarri to the west. It covers 71,000 km2 (27,000 sq mi) of ocean and straddles five states, running along the coast for 8,000 km (5,000 mi).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Giant kelp marine forests of south east Australia</span> Australian endangered ecological community

Giant kelp marine forests of south east Australia is an endangered ecological community, listed under the EPBC Act of the Commonwealth of Australia. The community is found in coastal waters of Victoria, South Australia, and Tasmania.

Brenda Konar is a marine scientist, and professor at University of Alaska Fairbanks.

References

  1. 1 2 Mann, K. H. (1973-12-07). "Seaweeds: Their Productivity and Strategy for Growth: The role of large marine algae in coastal productivity is far more important than has been suspected". Science. 182 (4116): 975–981. doi:10.1126/science.182.4116.975. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   17833778.
  2. Pessarrodona, A; Assis, J; Filbee-Dexter, K; Burrows, M T; Gattuso, J-P; Duarte, C.M.; Krause-Jensen, D; Moore, P.J.; Smale, D.A.; Wernberg, T (23 July 2020). "Global Seaweed Productivity". Science Advances. 8 (37): eabn2465. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn2465. hdl: 10754/681467 . PMC   9473579 . PMID   36103524.
  3. See Fig. 3 in Blakemore, Robert (2018). "Non-Flat Earth Recalibrated for Terrain and Topsoil". Soil Systems. 2 (4): 64. doi: 10.3390/soilsystems2040064 .
  4. 1 2 Graham, Michael H.; Kinlan, Brian P.; Druehl, Louis D.; Garske, Lauren E.; Banks, Stuart (2007-10-16). "Deep-water kelp refugia as potential hotspots of tropical marine diversity and productivity". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (42): 16576–16580. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10416576G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704778104 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   2034254 . PMID   17913882.
  5. the harvard classics: voyage of the beagle. P.F. Collier & Son Company. 1909.
  6. Christie, Hartvig; Jørgensen, Nina Mari; Norderhaug, Kjell Magnus; Waage-Nielsen, Elisabeth (August 2003). "Species distribution and habitat exploitation of fauna associated with kelp ( Laminaria Hyperborea ) along the Norwegian Coast". Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 83 (4): 687–699. Bibcode:2003JMBUK..83..687C. doi:10.1017/S0025315403007653h. ISSN   0025-3154. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-05.
  7. Jackson, George A.; Winant, Clinton D. (May 1983). "Effect of a kelp forest on coastal currents". Continental Shelf Research. 2 (1): 75–80. Bibcode:1983CSR.....2...75J. doi:10.1016/0278-4343(83)90023-7. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-05.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Steneck, Robert S.; Graham, Michael H.; Bourque, Bruce J.; Corbett, Debbie; Erlandson, Jon M.; Estes, James A.; Tegner, Mia J. (December 2002). "Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future". Environmental Conservation. 29 (4): 436–459. Bibcode:2002EnvCo..29..436S. doi:10.1017/S0376892902000322. ISSN   0376-8929. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-05.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Sala, E.; Boudouresque, C. F.; Harmelin-Vivien, M. (September 1998). "Fishing, Trophic Cascades, and the Structure of Algal Assemblages: Evaluation of an Old but Untested Paradigm". Oikos. 82 (3): 425. Bibcode:1998Oikos..82..425S. doi:10.2307/3546364. JSTOR   3546364.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Dayton, Paul K. (1985). "Ecology of Kelp Communities". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 16 (1): 215–245. Bibcode:1985AnRES..16..215D. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001243. ISSN   0066-4162. JSTOR   2097048.
  11. Norderhaug, Kjell Magnus; Christie, Hartvig C. (November 2009). "Sea urchin grazing and kelp re-vegetation in the NE Atlantic". Marine Biology Research. 5 (6): 515–528. Bibcode:2009MBioR...5..515N. doi:10.1080/17451000902932985. ISSN   1745-1000.
  12. Filbee-Dexter, Karen; Feehan, Colette J.; Scheibling, Robert E. (2016-02-03). "Large-scale degradation of a kelp ecosystem in an ocean warming hotspot". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 543: 141–152. Bibcode:2016MEPS..543..141F. doi:10.3354/meps11554. ISSN   0171-8630. Archived from the original on 2024-03-31. Retrieved 2024-03-31.
  13. Morton, Adam; Cordell, Marni; Fanner, David; Ball, Andy; Evershed, Nick. "The dead sea: Tasmania's underwater forests disappearing in our lifetime". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2020-10-22. Retrieved 2020-10-22.
  14. Steinbauer, James. "What Will It Take to Bring Back the Kelp Forest? - Bay Nature Magazine". Bay Nature. Archived from the original on 2020-10-20. Retrieved 2020-10-22.
  15. Kelp forests provide habitat for a variety of invertebrates, fish, marine mammals, and birds Archived 2017-09-09 at the Wayback Machine NOAA. Updated 11 January 2013. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
  16. Jones, Clive G.; Lawton, John H.; Shachak, Moshe (October 1997). "Positive and Negative Effects of Organisms as Physical Ecosystem Engineers". Ecology. 78 (7): 1946–1957. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1946:PANEOO]2.0.CO;2. ISSN   0012-9658. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-05.
  17. 1 2 Lüning, Klaus; tom Dieck, Inka (1990). Garbary, David J.; South, G. Robin (eds.). The Distribution and Evolution of the Laminariales: North Pacific — Atlantic Relationships. Evolutionary Biogeography of the Marine Algae of the North Atlantic. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 187–204. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75115-8_10. ISBN   978-3-642-75117-2. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-05.
  18. Wheeler, W. N. (1980). "Effect of boundary layer transport on the fixation of carbon by the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera". Marine Biology. 56 (2): 103–110. Bibcode:1980MarBi..56..103W. doi:10.1007/BF00397128. ISSN   0025-3162. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  19. Steneck, Robert S.; Dethier, Megan N. (April 1994). "A Functional Group Approach to the Structure of Algal-Dominated Communities". Oikos. 69 (3): 476. Bibcode:1994Oikos..69..476S. doi:10.2307/3545860. JSTOR   3545860. Archived from the original on 2020-02-14. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  20. Joly, Aylthon Brandão (1967). Two Brazilian Laminarias. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Pesquisas da Marinha. pp. 1–7. OL   4960200M. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  21. Petrov, J.E., M.V. Suchovejeva and G.V. Avdejev. 1973. New species of the genus Laminaria from the Philippine Sea. Nov Sistem. Nizch. Rast. 10: 59–61.
  22. Santelices, Bernabé (2007-12-04). "The discovery of kelp forests in deep-water habitats of tropical regions". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (49): 19163–19164. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10419163S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708963104 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   2148260 . PMID   18042707.
  23. 1 2 3 Foster, M.S.; Schiel, D.R. (1985-05-01). The Ecology of Giant Kelp Forests in California: A Community Profile... Biological Report 85(7.2) (Report). Department of the Interior.
  24. 1 2 Graham, Michael H. (June 2004). "Effects of Local Deforestation on the Diversity and Structure of Southern California Giant Kelp Forest Food Webs". Ecosystems. 7 (4): 341. Bibcode:2004Ecosy...7..341G. doi:10.1007/s10021-003-0245-6. ISSN   1432-9840. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  25. Fowler-Walker, Meegan J.; Gillanders, Bronwyn M.; Connell, Sean D.; Irving, Andrew D. (April 2005). "Patterns of association between canopy-morphology and understorey assemblages across temperate Australia". Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 63 (1–2): 133–141. Bibcode:2005ECSS...63..133F. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2004.10.016. Archived from the original on 2024-07-16. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  26. Jackson, George A. (November 1977). "Nutrients and production of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera , off southern California1". Limnology and Oceanography. 22 (6): 979–995. Bibcode:1977LimOc..22..979J. doi:10.4319/lo.1977.22.6.0979. ISSN   0024-3590. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  27. 1 2 Dayton, Paul K.; Tegner, Mia J.; Edwards, Peter B.; Riser, Kristin L. (May 1999). "Temporal and Spatial Scales of Kelp Demography: The Role of Oceanographic Climate". Ecological Monographs. 69 (2): 219. doi:10.2307/2657238. JSTOR   2657238.
  28. 1 2 Carr, Mark H. (July 1994). "Effects of Macroalgal Dynamics on Recruitment of a Temperate Reef Fish". Ecology. 75 (5): 1320–1333. Bibcode:1994Ecol...75.1320C. doi:10.2307/1937457. ISSN   0012-9658. JSTOR   1937457. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  29. 1 2 Estes, James A.; Duggins, David O. (February 1995). "Sea Otters and Kelp Forests in Alaska: Generality and Variation in a Community Ecological Paradigm". Ecological Monographs. 65 (1): 75–100. Bibcode:1995EcoM...65...75E. doi:10.2307/2937159. ISSN   0012-9615. JSTOR   2937159. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  30. 1 2 3 Pearse, J. S.; Hines, A. H. (March 1979). "Expansion of a central California kelp forest following the mass mortality of sea urchins". Marine Biology. 51 (1): 83–91. Bibcode:1979MarBi..51...83P. doi:10.1007/BF00389034. ISSN   0025-3162. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  31. Scheibling, Re; Hennigar, Aw (1997). "Recurrent outbreaks of disease in sea urchins Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in Nova Scotia:evidence for a link with large-scale meteorologic and oceanographic events". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 152: 155–165. Bibcode:1997MEPS..152..155S. doi:10.3354/meps152155. ISSN   0171-8630. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  32. Velimirov, B.; Field, J. G.; Griffiths, C. L.; Zoutendyk, P. (August 1977). "The ecology of kelp bed communities in the Benguela upwelling system: Analysis of biomass and spatial distribution". Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen. 30 (1–4): 495–518. doi:10.1007/BF02207857. ISSN   0017-9957. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  33. Andrew, N. L. (March 1993). "Spatial Heterogeneity, Sea Urchin Grazing, and Habitat Structure on Reefs in Temperate Australia". Ecology. 74 (2): 292–302. Bibcode:1993Ecol...74..292A. doi:10.2307/1939293. ISSN   0012-9658. JSTOR   1939293. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  34. Dayton, Paul K. (December 1985). "The Structure and Regulation of Some South American Kelp Communities". Ecological Monographs. 55 (4): 447–468. Bibcode:1985EcoM...55..447D. doi:10.2307/2937131. ISSN   0012-9615. JSTOR   2937131. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  35. 1 2 3 E, Sala; Mh, Graham (2002-03-19). "Community-wide distribution of predator-prey interaction strength in kelp forests". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 99 (6): 3678–3683. Bibcode:2002PNAS...99.3678S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052028499 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   122583 . PMID   11891292.
  36. Byrnes, Jarrett; Stachowicz, John J.; Hultgren, Kristin M.; Randall Hughes, A.; Olyarnik, Suzanne V.; Thornber, Carol S. (January 2006). "Predator diversity strengthens trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behaviour". Ecology Letters. 9 (1): 61–71. Bibcode:2006EcolL...9...61B. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00842.x. ISSN   1461-023X. PMID   16958869. Archived from the original on 2022-07-29. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  37. 1 2 Halpern, Benjamin S.; Cottenie, Karl; Broitman, Bernardo R. (2006-05-26). "Strong top-down control in southern California kelp forest ecosystems". Science. 312 (5777): 1230–1232. Bibcode:2006Sci...312.1230H. doi:10.1126/science.1128613. ISSN   1095-9203. PMID   16728644. Archived from the original on 2024-06-30. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  38. Lawrence, J.M. 1975. On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanography and Marine Biology, An Annual Review. 13: 213–286.
  39. Hughes, T. P. (1994-09-09). "Catastrophes, phase shifts, and large-scale degradation of a Caribbean coral reef". Science. 265 (5178): 1547–1551. Bibcode:1994Sci...265.1547H. doi:10.1126/science.265.5178.1547. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   17801530. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  40. Sivertsen, Knut (2006-11-27). "Overgrazing of Kelp Beds Along the Coast of Norway". Journal of Applied Phycology. 18 (3–5): 599–610. Bibcode:2006JAPco..18..599S. doi:10.1007/s10811-006-9064-4. ISSN   0921-8971. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  41. Filbee-Dexter, Karen; Scheibling, Robert E. (January 2017). "The present is the key to the past: linking regime shifts in kelp beds to the distribution of deep-living sea urchins". Ecology. 98 (1): 253–264. Bibcode:2017Ecol...98..253F. doi:10.1002/ecy.1638. ISSN   0012-9658. PMID   28052391. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-03-31.
  42. 1 2 3 4 5 Dayton, Paul K.; Tegner, Mia J.; Parnell, Paul E.; Edwards, Peter B. (September 1992). "Temporal and Spatial Patterns of Disturbance and Recovery in a Kelp Forest Community". Ecological Monographs. 62 (3): 421–445. Bibcode:1992EcoM...62..421D. doi:10.2307/2937118. ISSN   0012-9615. JSTOR   2937118. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  43. Pearse, John S. (2006-11-10). "Ecological role of purple sea urchins". Science. 314 (5801): 940–941. Bibcode:2006Sci...314..940P. doi:10.1126/science.1131888. ISSN   1095-9203. PMID   17095690. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  44. Filbee-Dexter, Karen; Scheibling, Robert E. (2014-01-09). "Sea urchin barrens as alternative stable states of collapsed kelp ecosystems". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 495: 1–25. Bibcode:2014MEPS..495....1F. doi:10.3354/meps10573. ISSN   0171-8630. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-03-31.
  45. Lafferty, Kevin D. (October 2004). "Fishing for lobsters indirectly increases epidemics in sea urchins". Ecological Applications. 14 (5): 1566–1573. Bibcode:2004EcoAp..14.1566L. doi:10.1890/03-5088. ISSN   1051-0761. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  46. 1 2 Vásquez, Julio A.; Vega, J. M. Alonso; Buschmann, Alejandro H. (2006-11-27). "Long Term Variability in the Structure of Kelp Communities in Northern Chile and the 1997–98 ENSO". Journal of Applied Phycology. 18 (3–5): 505–519. Bibcode:2006JAPco..18..505V. doi:10.1007/s10811-006-9056-4. ISSN   0921-8971. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  47. Cowen, Robert K. (May 1983). "The effects of sheephead (Semicossyphus pulcher) predation on red sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) populations: an experimental analysis". Oecologia. 58 (2): 249–255. Bibcode:1983Oecol..58..249C. doi:10.1007/BF00399225. ISSN   0029-8549. PMID   28310586. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  48. 1 2 Ebeling, A. W.; Laur, D. R.; Rowley, R. J. (January 1985). "Severe storm disturbances and reversal of community structure in a southern California kelp forest". Marine Biology. 84 (3): 287–294. Bibcode:1985MarBi..84..287E. doi:10.1007/BF00392498. ISSN   0025-3162. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  49. 1 2 Dayton, Paul K.; Tegner, Mia J. (1984-04-20). "Catastrophic Storms, El Niño, and Patch Stability in a Southern California Kelp Community". Science. 224 (4646): 283–285. Bibcode:1984Sci...224..283D. doi:10.1126/science.224.4646.283. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   17734914. Archived from the original on 2023-02-28. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  50. Harrold, Christopher; Reed, Daniel C. (August 1985). "Food Availability, Sea Urchin Grazing, and Kelp Forest Community Structure". Ecology. 66 (4): 1160–1169. Bibcode:1985Ecol...66.1160H. doi:10.2307/1939168. ISSN   0012-9658. JSTOR   1939168. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  51. Koop, K; Newell, Rc; Lucas, Mi (1982). "Biodegradation and Carbon Flow Based on Kelp (Ecklonia maxima) Debris in a Sandy Beach Microcosm" (PDF). Marine Ecology Progress Series. 7: 315–326. Bibcode:1982MEPS....7..315K. doi:10.3354/meps007315. ISSN   0171-8630. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  52. Bustamante, R. H.; Branch, G. M.; Eekhout, S. (October 1995). "Maintenance of an Exceptional Intertidal Grazer Biomass in South Africa: Subsidy by Subtidal Kelps". Ecology. 76 (7): 2314–2329. Bibcode:1995Ecol...76.2314B. doi:10.2307/1941704. ISSN   0012-9658. JSTOR   1941704. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  53. Kaehler, S; Pakhomov, Ea; Kalin, Rm; Davis, S (2006-07-03). "Trophic importance of kelp-derived suspended particulate matter in a through-flow sub-Antarctic system". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 316: 17–22. Bibcode:2006MEPS..316...17K. doi:10.3354/meps316017. ISSN   0171-8630. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  54. Grigg, R.W. and R.S. Kiwala. 1970. Some ecological effects of discharged wastes on marine life. California Department of Fish and Game 56: 145–155.
  55. Stull, J.K. (1989). "Contaminants In Sediments Near A Major Marine Outfall: History, Effects, And Future". Proceedings OCEANS (Report). Vol. 2. IEEE. pp. 481–484. doi:10.1109/OCEANS.1989.586780. Archived from the original on 2024-07-10. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  56. North, W. J.; James, D. E.; Jones, L. G. (June 1993). "History of kelp beds (Macrocystis) in Orange and San Diego Counties, California". Hydrobiologia. 260–261 (1): 277–283. Bibcode:1993HyBio.260..277N. doi:10.1007/BF00049029. ISSN   0018-8158. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  57. Tegner, M.J.; Dayton, P.K.; Edwards, P.B.; Riser, K.L.; Chadwick, D.B.; Dean, T.A.; Deysher, L. (January 1995). "Effects of a large sewage spill on a kelp forest community: Catastrophe or disturbance?". Marine Environmental Research. 40 (2): 181–224. Bibcode:1995MarER..40..181T. doi:10.1016/0141-1136(94)00008-D. Archived from the original on 2024-07-11. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  58. Carpenter, S. R.; Caraco, N. F.; Correll, D. L.; Howarth, R. W.; Sharpley, A. N.; Smith, V. H. (August 1998). "Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen". Ecological Applications. 8 (3): 559–568. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2. hdl: 1808/16724 . ISSN   1051-0761.
  59. Kennelly, Steven J. (1987). "Physical disturbances in an Australian kelp community. I. Temporal effects". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 40 (1/2): 145–153. Bibcode:1987MEPS...40..145K. doi:10.3354/meps040145. ISSN   0171-8630. JSTOR   24825709.
  60. McPhaden, M. J. (1999-02-12). "Genesis and evolution of the 1997-98 El Nino". Science. 283 (5404): 950–954. doi:10.1126/science.283.5404.950. ISSN   1095-9203. PMID   9974381. Archived from the original on 2024-06-25. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  61. Edwards, M. S.; Hernández-Carmona, G. (May 2005). "Delayed recovery of giant kelp near its southern range limit in the North Pacific following El Niño". Marine Biology. 147 (1): 273–279. Bibcode:2005MarBi.147..273E. doi:10.1007/s00227-004-1548-7. ISSN   0025-3162. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  62. Duggins, David O.; Eckman, James E.; Sewell, Amy T. (October 1990). "Ecology of understory kelp environments. II. Effects of kelps on recruitment of benthic invertebrates". Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 143 (1–2): 27–45. Bibcode:1990JEMBE.143...27D. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(90)90109-P. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  63. 1 2 Jackson, Jeremy B. C.; Kirby, Michael X.; Berger, Wolfgang H.; Bjorndal, Karen A.; Botsford, Louis W.; Bourque, Bruce J.; Bradbury, Roger H.; Cooke, Richard; Erlandson, Jon; Estes, James A.; Hughes, Terence P.; Kidwell, Susan; Lange, Carina B.; Lenihan, Hunter S.; Pandolfi, John M. (2001-07-27). "Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems". Science. 293 (5530): 629–637. doi:10.1126/science.1059199. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   11474098. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  64. Irving, Andrew D.; Connell, Sean D. (June 2006). "Predicting understorey structure from the presence and composition of canopies: an assembly rule for marine algae". Oecologia. 148 (3): 491–502. Bibcode:2006Oecol.148..491I. doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0389-0. ISSN   0029-8549. PMID   16502000. Archived from the original on 2022-01-20. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  65. Simenstad, Charles A.; Estes, James A.; Kenyon, Karl W. (1978-04-28). "Aleuts, Sea Otters, and Alternate Stable-State Communities". Science. 200 (4340): 403–411. Bibcode:1978Sci...200..403S. doi:10.1126/science.200.4340.403. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   17757287. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  66. Erlandson, Jon M.; Graham, Michael H.; Bourque, Bruce J.; Corbett, Debra; Estes, James A.; Steneck, Robert S. (2007-10-30). "The Kelp Highway Hypothesis: Marine Ecology, the Coastal Migration Theory, and the Peopling of the Americas". The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology. 2 (2): 161–174. doi:10.1080/15564890701628612. ISSN   1556-4894.
  67. Erlandson, Jon M.; Braje, Todd J.; Gill, Kristina M.; Graham, Michael H. (2015-09-02). "Ecology of the Kelp Highway: Did Marine Resources Facilitate Human Dispersal From Northeast Asia to the Americas?". The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology. 10 (3): 392–411. doi:10.1080/15564894.2014.1001923. ISSN   1556-4894. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  68. Gutierrez, Alfonso; Correa, Tomás; Muñoz, Verónica; Santibañez, Alejandro; Marcos, Roberto; Cáceres, Carlos; Buschmann, Alejandro H. (2006-11-27). "Farming of the Giant Kelp Macrocystis Pyrifera in Southern Chile for Development of Novel Food Products". Journal of Applied Phycology. 18 (3–5): 259–267. Bibcode:2006JAPco..18..259G. doi:10.1007/s10811-006-9025-y. ISSN   0921-8971. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  69. Ortiz, Marco; Stotz, Wolfgang (January 2007). "Ecological and eco-social models for the introduction of the abalone Haliotis discus hannai into benthic systems of north-central Chile: sustainability assessment". Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 17 (1): 89–105. Bibcode:2007ACMFE..17...89O. doi:10.1002/aqc.791. ISSN   1052-7613. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  70. Nielsen, Brittany (2021-10-21). "Monterey Bay Aquarium celebrates its 37th birthday". Archived from the original on 2022-12-02. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  71. Hurlimann, Sylvia (4 July 2019). "How Kelp Naturally Combats Global Climate Change". Science in the News. Archived from the original on 7 October 2024. Retrieved 21 June 2022.
  72. Filbee-Dexter, Karen; Wernberg, Thomas (23 July 2020). "Substantial blue carbon in overlooked Australian kelp forests". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 12341. Bibcode:2020NatSR..1012341F. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69258-7. PMC   7378163 . PMID   32703990.
  73. Krause-Jensen, Dorte; M. Duarte, Carlos (12 September 2016). "Substantial role of macroalgae in marine carbon sequestration". Nature Geoscience. 9 (10): 737–742. Bibcode:2016NatGe...9..737K. doi:10.1038/ngeo2790. Archived from the original on 20 June 2022. Retrieved 21 June 2022.
  74. Scheffer, Marten; Carpenter, Steve; Foley, Jonathan A.; Folke, Carl; Walker, Brian (October 2001). "Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems". Nature. 413 (6856): 591–596. Bibcode:2001Natur.413..591S. doi:10.1038/35098000. ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   11595939. Archived from the original on 2024-09-25. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  75. MacDonald, Lucy (2019-02-06). "95pc of Tasmania's giant kelp is gone, scientists are in a race to save what's left". ABC News. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2020-02-09.
  76. Frost, Thomas M.; Carpenter, Stephen R.; Ives, Anthony R.; Kratz, Timothy K. (1995). Jones, Clive G.; Lawton, John H. (eds.). Species Compensation and Complementarity in Ecosystem Function. Boston, MA: Springer US. pp. 224–239. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1773-3_22. ISBN   978-1-4613-5714-8. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  77. D, Tilman; Cl, Lehman; Ce, Bristow (Mar 1998). "Diversity-stability relationships: statistical inevitability or ecological consequence?". The American Naturalist. 151 (3): 277–282. doi:10.1086/286118. ISSN   0003-0147. PMID   18811358. Archived from the original on 2023-02-22. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  78. Stachowicz, John J.; Whitlatch, Robert B.; Osman, Richard W. (1999-11-19). "Species Diversity and Invasion Resistance in a Marine Ecosystem". Science. 286 (5444): 1577–1579. doi:10.1126/science.286.5444.1577. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   10567267. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  79. Elmqvist, Thomas; Folke, Carl; Nyström, Magnus; Peterson, Garry; Bengtsson, Jan; Walker, Brian; Norberg, Jon (November 2003). "Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience". Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 1 (9): 488–494. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0488:RDECAR]2.0.CO;2. ISSN   1540-9295.
  80. "Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability". www.ipcc.ch. Archived from the original on 2022-02-28. Retrieved 2022-02-28.
  81. Stekoll, M. S.; Deysher, L. E.; Hess, M. (2006-11-27). "A remote sensing approach to estimating harvestable kelp biomass". Journal of Applied Phycology. 18 (3–5): 323–334. Bibcode:2006JAPco..18..323S. doi:10.1007/s10811-006-9029-7. ISSN   0921-8971. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  82. Allison, Gary W.; Lubchenco, Jane; Carr, Mark H. (February 1998). "Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation". Ecological Applications. 8 (sp1): S79–S92. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)8[S79:MRANBN]2.0.CO;2. ISSN   1051-0761.
  83. Airamé, Satie; Dugan, Jenifer E.; Lafferty, Kevin D.; Leslie, Heather; McArdle, Deborah A.; Warner, Robert R. (February 2003). "Applying Ecological Criteria to Marine Reserve Design: A Case Study from the California Channel Islands". Ecological Applications. 13 (sp1): 170–184. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0170:AECTMR]2.0.CO;2. ISSN   1051-0761.
  84. Bohnsack, James A. (June 1998). "Application of marine reserves to reef fisheries management". Australian Journal of Ecology. 23 (3): 298–304. Bibcode:1998AusEc..23..298B. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1998.tb00734.x. ISSN   0307-692X. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  85. Gell, Fiona R.; Roberts, Callum M. (September 2003). "Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 18 (9): 448–455. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00189-7. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  86. Willis, Trevor J.; Millar, Russell B.; Babcock, Russ C. (April 2003). "Protection of exploited fish in temperate regions: high density and biomass of snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) in northern New Zealand marine reserves". Journal of Applied Ecology. 40 (2): 214–227. Bibcode:2003JApEc..40..214W. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00775.x. ISSN   0021-8901. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  87. Paddack, Michelle J; Estes, James A (2000-06-01). "Kelp forest fish populations in marine reserves and adjacent exploited areas of central californi". Ecological Applications. 10 (3): 855–870. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0855:kffpim]2.0.co;2. ISSN   1051-0761. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  88. Rogers-Bennett, Laura; Pearse, John S. (2001-06-07). "Indirect Benefits of Marine Protected Areas for Juvenile Abalone". Conservation Biology. 15 (3): 642–647. Bibcode:2001ConBi..15..642R. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003642.x. ISSN   0888-8892. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  89. Babcock, Russell C.; Kelly, Shane; Shears, Nick T.; Walker, Jarrod W.; Willis, Trevor J. (1999). "Changes in community structure in temperate marine reserves". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 189: 125–134. Bibcode:1999MEPS..189..125B. doi:10.3354/meps189125. ISSN   0171-8630. JSTOR   24854571.
  90. Halpern, Benjamin S.; Warner, Robert R. (May 2002). "Marine reserves have rapid and lasting effects". Ecology Letters. 5 (3): 361–366. Bibcode:2002EcolL...5..361H. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00326.x. ISSN   1461-023X. Archived from the original on 2024-02-01. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  91. "Hitting Rock Bottom: The Disappearance of California's Underwater Forests". The Bill Lane Center for the American West, Stanford University. 2021-03-18. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  92. Kerlin, Kat (2019-10-21). "California's Crashing Kelp Forest". Science and Climate. Archived from the original on 2021-08-11. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  93. University of California Santa Cruz (2021-03-05). "The collapse of Northern California kelp forests will be hard to reverse". phys.org. Archived from the original on 2021-03-05. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  94. "5 Reasons to Protect Kelp, the West Coast's Powerhouse Marine Algae". Pew Research Center . 2020-05-27. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  95. Foster, Michael S (2013). "Kelp Forests in California" (PDF). Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-08-11.
  96. Williams, Jonathan P.; Claisse, Jeremy T.; Ii, Daniel J. Pondella; Williams, Chelsea M.; Robart, Matthew J.; Scholz, Zoe; Jaco, Erin M.; Ford, Tom; Burdick, Heather; Witting, David (2021-04-15). "Sea urchin mass mortality rapidly restores kelp forest communities". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 664: 117–131. Bibcode:2021MEPS..664..117W. doi:10.3354/meps13680. ISSN   0171-8630. S2CID   234106934. Archived from the original on 2021-11-24. Retrieved 2021-11-24.
  97. "New Findings on Kelp Forest Restoration". USC Sea Grant - USC Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences. Archived from the original on 2021-08-11. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  98. "Saving California's kelp forests". CNN . Archived from the original on 2021-07-30. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  99. "New Study Finds Hope for Restoration of Kelp Beds and Commercial Fisheries". PolyCentric. 2021-06-21. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  100. "Project: Palos Verdes". SeaTrees, by Sustainable Surf. 2021. Archived from the original on 2020-07-02. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  101. Hohman, R (2019). "Sonoma-Mendocino Bull Kelp Recovery Plan, for Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary and California Department of Fish & Wildlife" (PDF). Greater Farallones Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-05-01. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  102. "Marine Invasive Species - Channel Islands National Park". U.S. National Park Service. 2017-04-17. Archived from the original on 2017-06-02. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  103. Ritchie, Erika I (2020-09-08). "An Orange County marine biologist wants to weed the ocean to help kelp grow". Orange County Register . Archived from the original on 2020-09-11. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  104. "Sunflower Sea Star Proposed for Endangered Species Act Protection". Center for Biological Diversity. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2023-11-30.
  105. "Kelp: California's Coastal Forests". Coastal and Marine Sciences Institute, UC Davis. 2021-01-12. Archived from the original on 2021-01-12. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  106. "Kelp Reforestation Program". Orange County Coastkeeper. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  107. "Kelp is on the Way". Humboldt State Now. 2021-07-12. Archived from the original on 2021-07-12. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  108. Leitzell, Katherine (2020-07-06). "New research to address kelp forest crisis in California". California Sea Grant. Archived from the original on 2020-07-08. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  109. Bittenbender, Steve (2021-08-10). "Huffman-sponsored bill seeks grant funding to restore kelp forests". SeafoodSource. Archived from the original on 2021-08-11. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  110. "Ocean rainforest secures $4.5 m to ramp up Californian kelp production". The Fish Site. 2023-10-12. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-07-22.
  111. 1 2 Djampou, Angeline (April 2023). Into the Blue: Securing a Sustainable Future for Kelp Forests. United Nations Environment Programme. doi:10.59117/20.500.11822/42255. ISBN   978-92-807-4007-3. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2024-04-15.