Soil contamination

Last updated
Excavation showing soil contamination at a disused gasworks in England Soilcontam.JPG
Excavation showing soil contamination at a disused gasworks in England

Soil contamination, soil pollution, or land pollution as a part of land degradation is caused by the presence of xenobiotic (human-made) chemicals or other alteration in the natural soil environment. It is typically caused by industrial activity, [1] agricultural chemicals [2] or improper disposal of waste. [3] The most common chemicals involved are petroleum hydrocarbons, [4] polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (such as naphthalene and benzo(a)pyrene), [5] solvents, [6] pesticides, [7] and heavy metals. [8] The concern over soil contamination stems primarily from health risks, from direct contact with contaminated soil or consumption of plants growing in contaminated soil, [9] vapour inhalation from the contaminants, [10] or from secondary contamination of water supplies within (groundwater) and underlying the soil (aquifer). [11] Mapping of contaminated soil sites and the resulting cleanups are time-consuming and expensive tasks, and require expertise in geology, hydrology, chemistry, computer modelling, and GIS in Environmental Contamination, as well as an appreciation of the history of site pollution. [12] It has been suggested that the examination of humus forms, which necessitates only a cursory glance upon ground floor thickness and structure of the underlying mineral horizon, could used at low cost for the early detection and mapping of potential soil contamination. [13]

Contents

In North America and Europe the extent of contaminated land is best known for as many of the countries in these areas have a legal framework to identify and deal with this environmental problem. [14] [15] [16] Other countries tend to be less tightly regulated despite some of them have undergone significant industrialization and are searching for more regulation. [17] [18]

Causes

Soil pollution can be caused by the following (non-exhaustive list):

The most common chemicals involved are petroleum hydrocarbons, solvents, pesticides, lead, and other heavy metals. [19]

Any activity that leads to other forms of soil degradation (erosion, compaction, etc.) may indirectly worsen the contamination effects in that soil remediation becomes more tedious. [20]

E-waste processing in Agbogbloshie, Ghana. Improper disposal of manufactured goods and industrial wastes, often means that communities in the global south have to process goods. Especially without proper protections, heavy metals and other contaminates can seep into the soil, and create water pollution and air pollution. Agbogbloshie, Ghana 2019.jpg
E-waste processing in Agbogbloshie, Ghana. Improper disposal of manufactured goods and industrial wastes, often means that communities in the global south have to process goods. Especially without proper protections, heavy metals and other contaminates can seep into the soil, and create water pollution and air pollution.

Historical deposition of coal ash used for residential, commercial, and industrial heating, as well as for industrial processes such as ore smelting, were a common source of contamination in areas that were industrialized before about 1960. [21] Coal naturally concentrates arsenic, cadmium lead and zinc during its formation, as well as other heavy metals to a lesser degree. [22] When the coal is burned, most of these metals become concentrated in the ash (the principal exception being mercury, which evaporates). [23] Coal ash and slag may contain sufficient lead to qualify as a "characteristic hazardous waste", [24] defined in the US as containing more than 5 mg/L, further revised to 1.5 mg/L of extractable lead using the TCLP procedure. [25] In addition to lead, coal ash typically contains variable but significant concentrations of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs; e.g., benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, phenanthrene, anthracene, and others). [26] These PAHs are known human carcinogens [27] and the acceptable concentrations of them in soil are typically from 0.1 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg, with a strong variation from a PAH to another. [28] Coal ash and slag can be recognised by the presence of off-white grains in soil, gray heterogeneous soil, or (coal slag) bubbly, vesicular pebble-sized grains. [29]

Treated sewage sludge, known in the industry as biosolids, has become controversial as a "fertilizer". As it is the byproduct of sewage treatment, it generally contains more contaminants such as organisms, pesticides, and heavy metals than other soil. [30] In the European Union, the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive allows sewage sludge to be sprayed onto land, although several European countries have introduced more stringent requirements in comparison with the directive. [31] 10 million tons dry matter of sewage sludge have been produced in Europe every year over the period 2003–2006. This has good agricultural properties due to the high nitrogen, phosphate and potassium content. [32] However, there is a need to control sewage sludge application to agricultural land so that pathogenic microorganisms do not get into water courses [33] and to ensure that there is no accumulation of heavy metals in the topsoil. [34] Composting of sewage sludge allows to decrease its content in pathogens [35] and organic pollutants (bioremediation, to the exception of persistent organic pollutants) [36] but not that of heavy metals, although these are in a less bioavailable form. [37]

Pesticides and herbicides

A pesticide is a substance used to kill a pest. A pesticide may be a chemical substance, biological agent (such as a virus or bacteria), antimicrobial, disinfectant or device used against any pest. Pests include harmful insects, plant pathogens, weeds, mollusks, birds, mammals, fish, nematodes (roundworms) and microbes that compete with humans for food, destroy property, spread or are a vector for disease or cause a nuisance. Although there are benefits to the use of pesticides, [38] there are also drawbacks, such as potential toxicity to humans [39] and other organisms. [40] [41] [42]

Herbicides are used to kill weeds, especially on pavements [43] and railways, [44] but also in agricultural crops either for destructing the total vegetation (e.g. glyphosate) or only a class of undesired plants (e.g. 2,4-D). The so-called auxin herbicides are similar to auxins and are selective to dicots. [45] Glyphosate is a non-selective (broad-spectrum) systemic herbicide which competes with enzymes used in the synthesis of key plant amino acids. [46] Most herbicides are biodegradable by soil bacteria. [47] However, one group derived from trinitrotoluene (2,4-D and 2,4,5-T) have the impurity dioxin, which is very toxic and causes fatality even in low concentrations. [48] Another common herbicide is Paraquat, banned in the European Union but still frequently used in agricultural areas of the United States and Asia. [49] It is highly toxic to humans [50] and other animals [51] and cannot rapidly degrade in the soil where it is adsorbed and thus protected in clay lattices. [52] Glyphosate is rapidly transformed in AMPA by soil bacteria but its residues are detected in drinking water, agriculture, and food products and have major effects on the health of reproductive systems. [53] Glyphosate is used in genetically modified crops to kill all vegetation except the target crop, more especially in developing countries where it offers yield and profit gains despite growing concerns about environment and human health. [54]

Insecticides are used to rid farms of pests which damage crops. The insects damage not only standing crops but also stored ones and in the tropics it is reckoned that one third of the total production is lost during food storage. [55] As with fungicides, the first insecticides used in the nineteenth century were inorganic e.g. Paris Green and other compounds of arsenic. [56] Nicotine has also been used since 1690. [57] Neonicotinoids, i.e. synthetic insecticides derived from nicotin are the last generation of insecticides. They have been scheduled to be highly selective to insect pests, although it appeared that acetamiprid, IMI, and thiacloprid were toxic to birds, thiacloprid to fish, and several neonicotinoids were harmful to honeybees, either by direct contact or ingestion. [58]

There are now three main groups of synthetic insecticides:

1. Organochlorines include DDT, Aldrin, Dieldrin and benzene hexachloride (BHC). They are cheap to produce, potent and persistent but have harmful effects on a lot of beneficial organisms, from microbes [59] to a wide range of plants and animals, humans included, [60] hence their banishment in many (but not all) countries, [61] inasmuch as resistance occurred in a lot of target insect pests. [62] DDT was used on a massive scale from the 1930s, with a peak of 72,000 tonnes used in 1970. [63] Then usage fell as the harmful environmental effects were realized. [64] It was found worldwide in fish and birds [65] and was even discovered in the snow in the Antarctic. [66] It is only slightly soluble in water [67] but is very soluble in the bloodstream, [68] and in fats. It affects the nervous [69] and endocrine systems [70] and causes the eggshells of birds to lack calcium causing them to be easily breakable. [71] It is thought to be responsible for the decline of numbers of birds of prey like ospreys and peregrine falcons in the 1950s, now recovering. [72] As well as increased concentration via the food chain, it is known to enter via permeable membranes, so fish get it through their gills and then it accumulates in fatty organs. [73] As it has low water solubility and a high affinity to the air-water interface, [74] DDT tends to stay at the water surface, so organisms that live there are most affected, in particular mosquito larvae, [75] the target organisms of malaria control. [76] DDT and its breakdown product DDE found in fish that formed part of the human food chain caused concern, with levels found in human liver, kidney and brain tissues around 13 ppm in 1970, [77] with a general decrease since DDT was banished from developing countries but with still high levels in Asia and Africa where DDT is used against malaria. [78] DDT was banned by the Stockholm convention in 2001 to stop its further buildup in the food chain. However, the World Health Organization allowed its reintroduction only for control of vector-borne diseases in some tropical countries in 2006. [79] U.S. manufacturers continued to sell DDT to developing countries, who could not afford the expensive replacement chemicals and who did not have such stringent regulations governing the use of pesticides. [80]

2. Organophosphates, e.g. parathion, methyl parathion and about 40 other insecticides are available nationally. Parathion is highly toxic, methyl-parathion less so [81] but health concerns have resulted in cancellation of the use of methyl-parathion in most food crops in the United States. [82] There is no evidence that malathion affects the ability of humans to reproduce. There is also no conclusive proof that malathion causes cancer in humans, although some studies have found increased incidence of some cancers in people who are regularly exposed to pesticides, such as farmers and pesticide applicators. [83] This group of insecticides works by preventing normal nerve transmission as acetylcholinesterase is prevented from breaking down the transmitter substance acetylcholine, resulting in uncontrolled muscle movements. [84]

3. Neonicotinoids, e.g. acetamiprid, imidacloprid, are the last generation of insecticides and are now largely used for crop protection. [85] They affect the central nervous system of insects, with higher selectivity for insects than organophosphates and organochlorines. [86] However, their biocidal action includes both pests and beneficial organisms, e.g. pollinators, [87] predatory insects, parasitoids. [88] The dramatic decline of honey bee colonies, [89] for example, could be linked to, or at least exacerbated by the use of neonicotinoids. [90] Like nicotine, their molecular base, they are degraded in the soil but the environmental residues of neonicotinoids have enormously increased due to large-scale applications. [91]

Agents of war

The disposal of munitions, and a lack of care in manufacture of munitions caused by the urgency of production, can contaminate soil for extended periods. There is little published evidence on this type of contamination largely because of restrictions placed by governments of many countries on the publication of material related to war effort. However, mustard gas stored during World War II has contaminated some sites for up to 50 years [92] and the testing of Anthrax as a potential biological weapon contaminated the whole island of Gruinard. [93]

Human health

Exposure pathways

Contaminated or polluted soil directly affects human health through direct contact with soil or via inhalation of soil contaminants that have vaporized; potentially greater threats are posed by the infiltration of soil contamination into groundwater aquifers used for human consumption, sometimes in areas apparently far removed from any apparent source of above-ground contamination. Toxic metals can also make their way up the food chain through plants that reside in soils containing high concentrations of heavy metals. [94] This tends to result in the development of pollution-related diseases.

Most exposure is accidental, and exposure can happen through: [95]

However, some studies estimate that 90% of exposure is through eating contaminated food. [95]

Consequences

Health consequences from exposure to soil contamination vary greatly depending on pollutant type, the pathway of attack, and the vulnerability of the exposed population. Researchers suggest that pesticides and heavy metals in soil may harm cardiovascular health, including inflammation and change in the body's internal clock. [96]

Chronic exposure to chromium, lead, and other metals, petroleum, solvents, and many pesticide and herbicide formulations can be carcinogenic, can cause congenital disorders, or can cause other chronic health conditions. Industrial or human-made concentrations of naturally occurring substances, such as nitrate and ammonia associated with livestock manure from agricultural operations, have also been identified as health hazards in soil and groundwater.[ citation needed ]

Chronic exposure to benzene at sufficient concentrations is known to be associated with a higher incidence of leukemia. Mercury and cyclodienes are known to induce higher incidences of kidney damage and some irreversible diseases. PCBs and cyclodienes are linked to liver toxicity. Organophosphates and carbonates can cause a chain of responses leading to neuromuscular blockage. Many chlorinated solvents induce liver changes, kidney changes, and depression of the central nervous system. There is an entire spectrum of further health effects such as headache, nausea, fatigue, eye irritation and skin rash for the above cited and other chemicals. At sufficient dosages a large number of soil contaminants can cause death by exposure via direct contact, inhalation or ingestion of contaminants in groundwater contaminated through soil.[ citation needed ]

The Scottish Government has commissioned the Institute of Occupational Medicine to undertake a review of methods to assess risk to human health from contaminated land. The overall aim of the project is to work up guidance that should be useful to Scottish Local Authorities in assessing whether sites represent a significant possibility of significant harm (SPOSH) to human health. It is envisaged that the output of the project will be a short document providing high level guidance on health risk assessment with reference to existing published guidance and methodologies that have been identified as being particularly relevant and helpful. The project will examine how policy guidelines have been developed for determining the acceptability of risks to human health and propose an approach for assessing what constitutes unacceptable risk in line with the criteria for SPOSH as defined in the legislation and the Scottish Statutory Guidance.[ citation needed ]

Ecosystem effects

This area is contaminated with stagnant water and refuse, making the environment unhygienic. Sanitation in Ghana.jpg
This area is contaminated with stagnant water and refuse, making the environment unhygienic.

Not unexpectedly, soil contaminants can have significant deleterious consequences for ecosystems. [97] There are radical soil chemistry changes which can arise from the presence of many hazardous chemicals even at low concentration of the contaminant species. These changes can manifest in the alteration of metabolism of endemic microorganisms and arthropods resident in a given soil environment. The result can be virtual eradication of some of the primary food chain, which in turn could have major consequences for predator or consumer species. Even if the chemical effect on lower life forms is small, the lower pyramid levels of the food chain may ingest alien chemicals, which normally become more concentrated for each consuming rung of the food chain. Many of these effects are now well known, such as the concentration of persistent DDT materials for avian consumers, leading to weakening of egg shells, increased chick mortality and potential extinction of species. [98]

Effects occur to agricultural lands which have certain types of soil contamination. Contaminants typically alter plant metabolism, often causing a reduction in crop yields. This has a secondary effect upon soil conservation, since the languishing crops cannot shield the Earth's soil from erosion. Some of these chemical contaminants have long half-lives and in other cases derivative chemicals are formed from decay of primary soil contaminants. [99]

Potential effects of contaminants to soil functions

Heavy metals and other soil contaminants can adversely affect the activity, species composition and abundance of soil microorganisms, thereby threatening soil functions such as biochemical cycling of carbon and nitrogen. [100] However, soil contaminants can also become less bioavailable by time, and microorganisms and ecosystems can adapt to altered conditions. Soil properties such as pH, organic matter content and texture are very important and modify mobility, bioavailability and toxicity of pollutants in contaminated soils. [101] The same amount of contaminant can be toxic in one soil but totally harmless in another soil. This stresses the need for soil-specific risks assessment and measures.

Cleanup options

Cleanup or environmental remediation is analyzed by environmental scientists who utilize field measurement of soil chemicals and also apply computer models (GIS in Environmental Contamination) for analyzing transport [102] and fate of soil chemicals. Various technologies have been developed for remediation of oil-contaminated soil and sediments [103] There are several principal strategies for remediation:

By country

Various national standards for concentrations of particular contaminants include the United States EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goals (U.S. PRGs), the U.S. EPA Region 3 Risk Based Concentrations (U.S. EPA RBCs) and National Environment Protection Council of Australia Guideline on Investigation Levels in Soil and Groundwater.

People's Republic of China

The immense and sustained growth of the People's Republic of China since the 1970s has exacted a price from the land in increased soil pollution. The Ministry of Ecology and Environment believes it to be a threat to the environment, to food safety and to sustainable agriculture. According to a scientific sampling, 150 million mu (100,000 square kilometres) of China's cultivated land have been polluted, with contaminated water being used to irrigate a further 32.5 million mu (21,670 square kilometres) and another 2 million mu (1,300 square kilometres) covered or destroyed by solid waste. In total, the area accounts for one-tenth of China's cultivatable land, and is mostly in economically developed areas. An estimated 12 million tonnes of grain are contaminated by heavy metals every year, causing direct losses of 20 billion yuan ($2.57 billion USD). [106] Recent survey shows that 19% of the agricultural soils are contaminated which contains heavy metals and metalloids. And the rate of these heavy metals in the soil has been increased dramatically. [107]

European Union

According to the received data from Member states, in the European Union the number of estimated potential contaminated sites is more than 2.5 million [108] and the identified contaminated sites around 342 thousand. Municipal and industrial wastes contribute most to soil contamination (38%), followed by the industrial/commercial sector (34%). Mineral oil and heavy metals are the main contaminants contributing around 60% to soil contamination. In terms of budget, the management of contaminated sites is estimated to cost around 6 billion Euros (€) annually. [108]

United Kingdom

Generic guidance commonly used in the United Kingdom are the Soil Guideline Values published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the Environment Agency. These are screening values that demonstrate the minimal acceptable level of a substance. Above this there can be no assurances in terms of significant risk of harm to human health. These have been derived using the Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment Model (CLEA UK). Certain input parameters such as Health Criteria Values, age and land use are fed into CLEA UK to obtain a probabilistic output. [109]

Guidance by the Inter Departmental Committee for the Redevelopment of Contaminated Land (ICRCL) [110] has been formally withdrawn by DEFRA, for use as a prescriptive document to determine the potential need for remediation or further assessment.

The CLEA model published by DEFRA and the Environment Agency (EA) in March 2002 sets a framework for the appropriate assessment of risks to human health from contaminated land, as required by Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. As part of this framework, generic Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) have currently been derived for ten contaminants to be used as "intervention values". [111] These values should not be considered as remedial targets but values above which further detailed assessment should be considered; see Dutch standards.

Three sets of CLEA SGVs have been produced for three different land uses, namely

It is intended that the SGVs replace the former ICRCL values. The CLEA SGVs relate to assessing chronic (long term) risks to human health and do not apply to the protection of ground workers during construction, or other potential receptors such as groundwater, buildings, plants or other ecosystems. The CLEA SGVs are not directly applicable to a site completely covered in hardstanding, as there is no direct exposure route to contaminated soils. [112]

To date, the first ten of fifty-five contaminant SGVs have been published, for the following: arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, inorganic mercury, nickel, selenium ethyl benzene, phenol and toluene. Draft SGVs for benzene, naphthalene and xylene have been produced but their publication is on hold. Toxicological data (Tox) has been published for each of these contaminants as well as for benzo[a]pyrene, benzene, dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs, naphthalene, vinyl chloride, 1,1,2,2 tetrachloroethane and 1,1,1,2 tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1 trichloroethane, tetrachloroethene, carbon tetrachloride, 1,2-dichloroethane, trichloroethene and xylene. The SGVs for ethyl benzene, phenol and toluene are dependent on the soil organic matter (SOM) content (which can be calculated from the total organic carbon (TOC) content). As an initial screen the SGVs for 1% SOM are considered to be appropriate. [113]

Canada

As of February 2021, there are a total of 2,500 plus contaminated sites in Canada. [114] One infamous contaminated sited is located near a nickel-copper smelting site in Sudbury, Ontario. A study investigating the heavy metal pollution in the vicinity of the smelter reveals that elevated levels of nickel and copper were found in the soil; values going as high as 5,104ppm Ni, and 2,892 ppm Cu within a 1.1 km range of the smelter location. Other metals were also found in the soil; such metals include iron, cobalt, and silver. Furthermore, upon examining the different vegetation surrounding the smelter it was evident that they too had been affected; the results show that the plants contained nickel, copper and aluminium as a result of soil contamination. [115]

India

In March 2009, the issue of uranium poisoning in Punjab attracted press coverage. It was alleged to be caused by fly ash ponds of thermal power stations, which reportedly lead to severe birth defects in children in the Faridkot and Bhatinda districts of Punjab. The news reports claimed the uranium levels were more than 60 times the maximum safe limit. [116] [117] In 2012, the Government of India confirmed [118] that the ground water in Malwa belt of Punjab has uranium metal that is 50% above the trace limits set by the United Nations' World Health Organization (WHO). Scientific studies, based on over 1000 samples from various sampling points, could not trace the source to fly ash and any sources from thermal power plants or industry as originally alleged. The study also revealed that the uranium concentration in ground water of Malwa district is not 60 times the WHO limits, but only 50% above the WHO limit in 3 locations. This highest concentration found in samples was less than those found naturally in ground waters currently used for human purposes elsewhere, such as Finland. [119] Research is underway to identify natural or other sources for the uranium.

See also

References

  1. Zhou, Xi-Yin; Wang, Xiu-Ru (1 September 2019). "Impact of industrial activities on heavy metal contamination in soils in three major urban agglomerations of China". Journal of Cleaner Production . 230: 1–10. Bibcode:2019JCPro.230....1Z. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.098 . Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  2. Chaney, Rufus L.; Oliver, Danielle P. (1996). "Sources, potential adverse effects and remediation of agricultural soil contaminants". In Naidu, Ravi; Kookana, Rai S.; Oliver, Danielle P.; Rogers, Shane; McLaughlin, Michael J. (eds.). Contaminants and the soil environment in the Australasia-Pacific region. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 323–59. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1626-5_11. ISBN   978-94-009-1626-5 . Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  3. Afolagboye, Lekan Olatayo; Ojo, Amos Abayomi; Talabi, Abel Ojo (22 October 2020). "Evaluation of soil contamination status around a municipal waste dumpsite using contamination indices, soil-quality guidelines, and multivariate statistical analysis". SN Applied Sciences . 2 (11) 1864. doi:10.1007/s42452-020-03678-y . Retrieved 27 January 2026.
  4. Ellis, Roscoe Jr; Adams, Russell S. Jr (1961). "Contamination of soils by petroleum hydrocarbons". In Norman, Arthur Geoffrey (ed.). Advances in agronomy. Vol. 13. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 197–216. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60959-1. ISBN   978-0-12-000713-4 . Retrieved 27 January 2026.{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  5. Zhang, Pei; Chen, Yinguang (15 December 2007). "Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contamination in surface soil of China: a review". Science of the Total Environment . 605–606: 1011–20. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.247. PMID   28693106 . Retrieved 27 January 2026.
  6. Joshi, Dirgha Raj; Adhikari, Nisha (29 June 2019). "An overview on common organic solvents and their toxicity". Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International. 28 (3): 1–18. doi:10.9734/JPRI/2019/v28i330203 . Retrieved 27 January 2026.
  7. Wołejko, Elżbieta; Jabłońska-Trypuć, Agata; Wydro, Urszula; Butarewicz, Andrzej; Łozowicka, Bożena (March 2020). "Soil biological activity as an indicator of soil pollution with pesticides: a review". Applied Soil Ecology. 147 103356. Bibcode:2020AppSE.14703356W. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.09.006 . Retrieved 27 January 2026.
  8. Anweting, Idongesit B.; Ebong, Godwin Asukwo; Okon, Iniobong Edet; Udofia, Ifreke Mfon; Oladunni, Nathaniel (24 May 2024). "Evaluating the concentration of Pb, Hg, Co, V, As, Fe, Cu, Cd, Cr, Mn, Ni, and Zn and their potential sources in soil from two abattoirs in Itu and Ikot Ekpene Local Government Areas of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria". Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management. 28 (5): 1335–43. doi:10.4314/jasem.v28i5.2 . Retrieved 27 January 2026.
  9. Kicińska, Alicja; Wikar, Justyna (14 December 2023). "Health risk associated with soil and plant contamination in industrial areas". Plant and Soil . 498 (1–2): 295–323. doi:10.1007/s11104-023-06436-2 . Retrieved 27 January 2026.
  10. Turczynowicz, Leonid; Pisaniello, Dino; Williamson, Terry (27 September 2012). "Health risk assessment and vapor intrusion: a review and Australian perspective". Human and Ecological Risk Assessment . 18 (5): 984–1013. Bibcode:2012HERA...18..984T. doi:10.1080/10807039.2012.707929 . Retrieved 27 January 2026.
  11. Petkovic, Sava; Gregoric, Enika; Slepcevic, Vesna; Blagojevic, Srdjan; Gajic, Bosko; Kljujev, Igor; Žarković, Branka; Djurovic, Nevenka; Draskovic, Radovan (8 April 2011). "Contamination of local water supply systems in suburban Belgrade". Urban Water Journal . 8 (2): 79–92. Bibcode:2011UrbWJ...8...79P. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2010.546862 . Retrieved 27 January 2026.
  12. George, Rebecca; Joy, Varsha; Aiswarya, S.; Jacob, Priya Achamma (June 2014). "Treatment methods for contaminated soils: translating science into practice". International Journal of Education and Applied Research. 4 (1): 17–19. Retrieved 28 January 2026.
  13. Korkina, Irina N.; Vorobeichik, Evgenii L. (February 2018). "Humus Index as an indicator of the topsoil response to the impacts of industrial pollution". Applied Soil Ecology. 123: 455–63. Bibcode:2018AppSE.123..455K. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.09.025 . Retrieved 28 January 2026.
  14. "Soil Monitoring Law". environment.ec.europa.eu/. December 2025. Retrieved 29 January 2026.
  15. Ramón, Francisca; Lull, Cristina (July 2019). "Legal measures to prevent and manage soil contamination and to increase food safety for consumer health: the case of Spain". Environmental Pollution. 250: 883–91. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.074 . Retrieved 29 January 2026.
  16. Li, Wenbiao; Li, Zijian; Jennings, Aaron (December 2018). "Regulatory performance dataset constructed from U.S. soil jurisdictions based on the top 100 concerned pollutants". Data in Brief. 21 (6): 36–49. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.049 . Retrieved 29 January 2026.
  17. Sun, Yiming; Li (December 2019). "Soil contamination in China: studies on the status, priorities, policies, management and risk assessment" (PDF). Lancaster University . Retrieved 29 January 2026.
  18. Yakovlev, Aleksandr Sergeevich; Evdokimova, Mariya V. (24 May 2022). "Approaches to the regulation of soil pollution in Russia and foreign countries". Eurasian Soil Science. 55 (5): 641–50. doi:10.1134/S1064229322050131 . Retrieved 29 January 2026.
  19. Rodríguez-Eugenio, Natalia; McLaughlin, Michael; Pennock, Daniel (2018). "Soil pollution: a hidden reality". Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . Rome, Italy. Retrieved 29 January 2026.
  20. Thompson, Richard (2021). "Technologies for remediating polluted soils". Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . Rome, Italy. Retrieved 29 January 2026.
  21. Kamara, Saidu; Foday, Edward Hingha Jr; Wang, Wei (2 July 2023). "A review on the utilization and environmental concerns of coal fly ash". American Journal of Chemistry and Pharmacy. 2 (2): 53–65. doi:10.54536/ajcp.v2i2.1609 . Retrieved 29 January 2026.
  22. Mastalerz, Maria; Drobniak, Agnieszka (1 June 2007). "Arsenic, cadmium, lead, and zinc in the Danville and Springfield coal members (Pennsylvanian) from Indiana". International Journal of Coal Geology. 71 (1): 37–53. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2006.05.005 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  23. Vassilev, Stanislav V.; Vassileva, Christina G. (March 1997). "Geochemistry of coals, coal ashes and combustion wastes from coal-fired power stations". Fuel Processing Technology. 51 (1–2): 19–45. doi:10.1016/S0378-3820(96)01082-X . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  24. Block, Chantal; Dams, R. (December 1975). "Lead contents of coal, coal ash and fly ash". Water, Air, & Soil Pollution . 5 (2): 207–11. doi:10.1007/BF00282962 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  25. Intrakamhaeng, Vicharana; Clavier, Kyle A.; Townsend, Timothy G. (5 February 2020). "Hazardous waste characterization implications of updating the toxicity characteristic list". Journal of Hazardous Materials . 383 121171. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121171 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  26. Buha-Marković, Jovana Z.; Marinković, Ana D.; Nemoda, Stevan D.; Savić, Jasmina Z. (November 2020). "Distribution of PAHs in coal ashes from the thermal power plant and fluidized bed combustion system; estimation of environmental risk of ash disposal". Environmental Pollution . 266 (Part 3) 115282. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115282 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  27. Straif, Kurt; Baan, Robert; Grosse, Yann; Secretan, Béatrice; El Ghissassi, Fatiha; Cogliano, Vincent (December 2005). "Carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons". The Lancet Oncology . 6 (12): 931–2. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70458-7 . Retrieved 27 January 2026.
  28. Kalf, Dennis F.; Crommentuijn, Trudie; Van de Plassche, Erik J. (February 1997). "Environmental quality objectives for 10 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)". Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety . 36 (1): 89–97. doi:10.1006/eesa.1996.1495 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  29. Fisher, Gerald L.; Prentice, Bruce A.; Silberman, David; Ondov, John M.; Biermann, Arthur H.; Ragaini, Richard C.; McFarland, Andrew R. (April 1978). "Physical and morphological studies of size-classified coal fly ash". Environmental Science & Technology . 12 (4): 447–51. doi:10.1021/es60140a008 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  30. Snyder, Caroline (19 July 2013). "The dirty work of promoting "recycling" of America's sewage sludge". International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health . 11 (4): 415–27. doi:10.1179/oeh.2005.11.4.415 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  31. Hudcová, Hana; Vymazal, Jan; Rozkošný, Miloš (30 June 2019). "Present restrictions of sewage sludge application in agriculture within the European Union" (PDF). Soil and Water Research. 14 (2): 104–20. doi:10.17221/36/2018-SWR . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  32. Antoniadis, Vasileios; Koutroubas, Spyridon D.; Fotiadis, Sideris (8 January 2015). "Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium availability in manure- and sewage sludge-applied soil". Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 46 (3): 393–404. doi:10.1080/00103624.2014.983241 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  33. Lewis, David L.; Gattie, David K. (1 July 2002). "Pathogen risks from applying sewage sludge to land". Environmental Science & Technology . 36 (13): 287A–293A. doi:10.1021/es0223426 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  34. Alloway, Bryan J.; Jackson, Andrew P. (March 1991). "The behaviour of heavy metals in sewage sludge-amended soils". Science of the Total Environment . 100: 151–76. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(91)90377-Q . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  35. Dumontet, Stefano; Dinel, Henri; Baloda, Suraj B. (24 April 2012). "Pathogen reduction in sewage sludge by composting and other biological treatments: a review". Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. 16 (4): 409–30. doi:10.1080/01448765.1999.9755243 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  36. Lü, Huixiong; Chen, Xiao-Hong; Mo, Ce-Hui; Huang, Yu-Hong; He, Min-Ying; Li, Yan-Wen; Feng, Nai-Xian; Katsoyiannis, Athanasios; Cai, Quan-Ying (May 2021). "Occurrence and dissipation mechanism of organic pollutants during the composting of sewage sludge: a critical review". Bioresource Technology . 328 124847. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124847 . Retrieved 30 January 2026.
  37. Smith, Stephen R. (January 2009). "A critical review of the bioavailability and impacts of heavy metals in municipal solid waste composts compared to sewage sludge". Environment International . 35 (1): 142–56. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.06.009 . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  38. Cooper, Jerry; Dobson, Hans (September 2007). "The benefits of pesticides to mankind and the environment". Crop Protection . 26 (9): 1337–48. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2007.03.022 . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  39. Mostafalou, Sara; Abdollahi, Mohammad (8 October 2016). "Pesticides: an update of human exposure and toxicity". Archives of Toxicology . 91 (2): 549–99. doi:10.1007/s00204-016-1849-x . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  40. DeLorenzo, Marie E.; Scott, Geoffrey I.; Ross, Philippe E. (1 January 2001). "Toxicity of pesticides to aquatic microorganisms: a review". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry . 20 (1): 84–98. doi:10.1002/etc.5620200108 . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  41. Borke, Jesse (4 August 2025). "Pesticides". Bethesda, Maryland: National Library of Medicine . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  42. "Pesticides" (PDF). Phoenix, Arizona: American College of Medical Toxicology . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  43. Melander, Bo; Holst, Niels; Grundy, Andrea C.; Kempenaar, Corné; Riemens, Marleen M.; Verschwele, Arnd; Hansson, David (2 September 2009). "Weed occurrence on pavements in five North European towns". Weed Research. 49 (5): 516–25. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00713.x . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  44. Torstensson, Lennart (February 2001). "Use of herbicides on railway tracks in Sweden". Pesticide Outlook. 12 (1): 16–21. doi:10.1039/b100802l . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  45. Grossmann, Klaus (February 2010). "Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and mode of action". Pest Management Science. 66 (2): 113–20. doi:10.1002/ps.1860 . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  46. Amrhein, Nikolaus; Schab, Joachim; Steinrücken, Hans Christian (July 1980). "The mode of action of the herbicide glyphosate". Naturwissenschaften . 67: 356–7. doi:10.1007/BF01106593 . Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  47. Singh, Baljinder; Singh, Kashmir (27 August 2014). "Microbial degradation of herbicides". Critical Reviews in Microbiology . 42 (2): 245–61. doi:10.3109/1040841X.2014.929564 . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  48. Birnbaum, Linda S. (1994). "The mechanism of dioxin toxicity: relationship to risk assessment". Environmental Health Perspectives . 102 (Suppl. 9): 157–67. doi:10.1289/ehp.94102s9157 . Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  49. Utyasheva, Leah; Amarasinghe, Prabath; Eddleston, Michael (24 September 2025). "Paraquat at 63–the story of a controversial herbicide and its regulations: it is time to put people and public health first when regulating paraquat". BMC Public Health . 25 3089. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23830-w .
  50. Borke, Jesse (7 January 2025). "Paraquat poisoning". Bethesda, Maryland: National Library of Medicine . Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  51. Donaher, Sarah E.; Van den Hurk, Peter (16 November 2023). "Ecotoxicology of the herbicide paraquat: effects on wildlife and knowledge gaps". Ecotoxicology . 32 (5): 1187–99. doi:10.1007/s10646-023-02714-y . Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  52. Huang, Yaohua; Zhan, Hui; Bhatt, Pankaj; Chen, Shaohua (2 August 2019). "Paraquat degradation from contaminated environments: current achievements and perspectives". Frontiers in Microbiology . 10 1754. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01754 . Retrieved 3 February 2026.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  53. Mohammadi, Keyhan; Sani, Mahmood Alizadeh; Safaei, Payam; Rahmani, Jamal; Molaee-Aghaee, Ebrahim; Jafari, Seid Mahdi (27 August 2021). "A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impacts of glyphosate on the reproductive hormones". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29 (41): 62030–41. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16145-x . Retrieved 2 February 2026.
  54. Clapp, Jennifer (March 2021). "Explaining growing glyphosate use: the political economy of herbicide-dependent agriculture" (PDF). Global Environmental Change . 67 (6) 102239. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102239 . Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  55. De Lima, Caitano P. F. (1987). "Insect pests and postharvest problems in the tropics". Insect Science and its Application. 8 (4–5–6): 673–6. doi:10.1017/S1742758400022773 . Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  56. Roark, Ruric Creegan (May 1935). "Insecticides and fungicides". Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 27 (5): 530–2. doi:10.1021/IE50305A009 . Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  57. Perry, Albert S.; Yamamoto, Izuru; Ishaaya, Isaac; Perry, Rika (1998). "Botanical insecticides". In Perry, Albert S.; Yamamoto, Izuru; Ishaaya, Isaac; Perry, Rika (eds.). Insecticides in agriculture and environment: retrospects and prospects. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. pp. 78–91. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03656-3_13. ISBN   978-3-662-03656-3 . Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  58. Tomizawa, Motohiro; Casida, John E. (February 2005). "Neonicotinoid insecticide toxicology: mechanisms of selective action". Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 45: 247–68. doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095930. PMID   15822177 . Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  59. Lal, Rup; Saxena, D. M. (March 1982). "Accumulation, metabolism, and effects of organochlorine insecticides on microorganisms". Microbiological Reviews . 46 (1): 95–127. doi:10.1128/MMBR.46.1.95-127.1982 . Retrieved 3 February 2026.
  60. Jayaraj, Ravindran; Megha, Pankajshan; Sreedev, Puthur (22 July 2016). "Organochlorine pesticides, their toxic effects on living organisms and their fate in the environment". Interdisciplinary Toxicology. 9 (3–4): 90–100. doi: 10.1515/intox-2016-0012 .
  61. Gómez-Ramírez, Pilar; Pérez-García, Juan Manuel; León-Ortega, Mario; Martínez, José Enrique; Calvo, José Francisco; Sánchez-Zapata, José Antonio; Botella, Francisco; María-Mojica, Pedro; Martínez-López, Emma; García-Fernández, Antonio Juan (September 2019). "Spatiotemporal variations of organochlorine pesticides in an apex predator: influence of government regulations and farming practices" (PDF). Environmental Research. 176 108543. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.108543 . Retrieved 4 February 2026.
  62. Karaağaç, Sakine Ugurlu (5 January 2012). "Insecticide resistance". In Perveen, Farzana Khan (ed.). Insecticides: advances in integrated pest management. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen. pp. 469–78. doi:10.5772/28086. ISBN   978-953-51-4382-6 . Retrieved 4 February 2026.
  63. Voldner, Eva C.; Li, Yi-Fan (15 January 1995). "Global usage of selected persistent organochlorines". Science of the Total Environment . 160–161: 201–10. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(95)04357-7 . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  64. Turuzov, Vladimir; Rakitzky, Valery; Tomatis, Lorenzo (February 2002). "Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT): ubiquity, persistence, and risks" (PDF). Environmental Health Perspectives . 1110 (2): 125–8. doi:10.1289/ehp.02110125 . Retrieved 4 February 2026.
  65. Woodwell, George M.; Wurster, Charles F. Jr; Isaacson, Peter A. (12 May 1967). "DDT residues in an East Coast estuary: a case of biological concentration of a persistent insecticide". Science . 156 (3776): 821–4. doi:10.1126/science.156.3776.821 . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  66. Peel, David A. (27 March 1975). "Organochlorine residues in Antarctic snow". Nature . 254 (5498): 324–5. doi:10.1038/254324a0 . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  67. Bowman, Malcolm C.; Acree, Fred Jr; Corbett, M. K. (1 May 1960). "Solubility of carbon-14 DDT in water". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 8 (5): 406–8. doi:10.1021/jf60111a020 . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  68. Dale, William E.; Miles, James W.; Gaixes, Thomas B. (1 November 1970). "Quantitative method for determination of DDT and DDT metabolites in blood serum". Journal of AOAC International . 53 (6): 1287–92. doi:10.1093/jaoac/53.6.1287 . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  69. Van Wendel de Joode, Berna; Wesseling, Katharina; Kromhout, Hans; Monge, Patricia; Garcia, Marco; Mergler, Donna (31 March 2001). "Chronic nervous-system effects of long-term occupational exposure to DDT". The Lancet . 357 (9261): 1014–6. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04249-5 . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  70. Jaga, Kushik (January 2000). "What are the implications of the interaction between DDT and estrogen receptors in the body?". Medical Hypotheses . 54 (1): 18–25. doi:10.1054/mehy.1998.0811 . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  71. Bitman, Joel; Cecil, Helene C.; Fries, George F. (May 1970). "DDT-induced inhibition of avian shell gland carbonic anhydrase: a mechanism for thin eggshells". Science . 168 (3931): 594–6. doi:10.1126/science.168.3931.594 . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  72. Ehrlich, Paul R.; Dobkin, David S.; Wheye, Darryl. "DDT and birds". web.stanford.edu. Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  73. Holden, A. V. (September 1962). "A study of the absorption of 14C-labelled DDT from water by fish". Annals of Applied Biology . 50 (3): 467–77. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1962.tb06042.x . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  74. Acree, Fred Jr; Berosa, Morton; Bowman, Malcolm C. (July–August 1963). "Codistillation of DDT with water" (PDF). Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 11 (4): 278–80. Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  75. Tarzwell, Clarence M. (11 April 1947). "Effects of DDT mosquito larviciding on wildlife. I. The effects on surface organisms of the routine hand application of DDT larvicides for mosquito control". Public Health Reports . 62 (15): 525–54. doi:10.2307/4586091 . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  76. Maharaj, Rajendra; Mthembu, D. Jamela; Sharp, B. L. (1 November 2005). "Impact of DDT re-introduction on malaria transmission in KwaZulu-Natal". South African Medical Journal . 95 (11): 871–4. Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  77. Trojanowska, Monika; Stankiewicz, Z.; Szucki, Bohdan; Pomorska, K.; Majewska, B. (July 1972). "DDT and DDE content of human tissues". Forensic Science. 1 (2): 239–43. doi:10.1016/0300-9432(72)90047-7 . Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  78. Kushik, Jaga; Chandrabhan, Dharmani (2003). "Global surveillance of DDT and DDE levels in human tissues" (PDF). International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 16 (1): 7–20. Retrieved 5 February 2026.
  79. Mansouri, Ahlem; Cregut, Mickaël; Abbes, Chiraz; Durand, Marie-José; Landoulsi, Ahmed; Thouand, Gérald (3 September 2016). "The environmental issues of DDT pollution and bioremediation: a multidisciplinary review". Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 181 (1): 309–39. doi:10.1007/s12010-016-2214-5 . Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  80. "DDT: a brief history and status". www.epa.gov. 11 September 2025. Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  81. Benke, Geza M.; Cheever, K. L.; Mirer, Franklin E.; Murphy, Sheldon D. (April 1974). "Comparative toxicity, anticholinesterase action and metabolism of methyl parathion and parathion in sunfish and mice". Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology . 28 (1): 97–109. doi:10.1016/0041-008X(74)90135-5 . Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  82. Garcia, Stephanie; Abu-Quare, Aqel; Meeker-O'Connell, Winifred; Borton, Anita; Abou-Donia, Mohamed (7 January 2011). "Methyl parathion: a review of health effects". Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B. 6 (2): 185–210. doi:10.1080/10937400306471 . Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  83. Wilson, Jewell D.; Llados, Fernando T.; Singh, Mona; Sutton, Cheryl A.; Sutton, William R.; Nakatsugawa, Tsutomu; Benson, Amy (September 2003). "Toxicological profile for malathion" (PDF). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Atlanta, Georgia. Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  84. Tsai, Yi-Hua; Lein, Pamela J. (June 2021). "Mechanisms of organophosphate neurotoxicity". Current Opinion in Toxicology . 26 (2): 49–60. doi:10.1016/j.cotox.2021.04.002 . Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  85. Elbert, Alfred; Haas, Matthias; Springer, Bernd; Thelert, Wolfgang; Nauen, Ralf (November 2008). "Applied aspects of neonicotinoid uses in crop protection". Pest Management Science. 64 (11): 1099–105. doi:10.1002/ps.1616 . Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  86. Kundoo, Ajaz Ahmad; Dar, Showket Ahmad; Mushtaq, Muntazir; Bashir, Zaffar; Dar, Mohammad Saleem; Gul, Shaheen; Ali, Mohammad Tawseef; Gulzar, Shammema (2018). "Role of neonicotinoids in insect pest management: a review" (PDF). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 6 (1): 333–9. Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  87. Paoli, Marco; Giurfa, Martin (October 2024). "Pesticides and pollinator brain: how do neonicotinoids affect the central nervous system of bees?". European Journal of Neuroscience . 60 (8): 5927–48. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16536 .
  88. Cloyd, Raymond A.; Bethke, James A. (January 2011). "Impact of neonicotinoid insecticides on natural enemies in greenhouse and interiorscape environments". Pest Management Science. 67 (1): 3–9. Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  89. Watanabe, Myrna E. (26 August 1994). "Pollination worries rise as honey bees decline". Science . 265 (5176): 1170. Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  90. Klingelhöfer, Doris; Braun, Markus; Brüggmann, Dörthe; Groneberg, David A. (October 2022). "Neonicotinoids: a critical assessment of the global research landscape of the most extensively used insecticide". Environmental Research . 213 113727. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.113727 . Retrieved 6 February 2026.
  91. Pang, Shimei; Lin, Ziqiu; Zhang, Wenping; Mishra, Sandhya; Bhatt, Pankaj; Chen, Shaohua (19 May 2020). "Insights into the microbial degradation and biochemical mechanisms of neonicotinoids". Frontiers in Microbiology . 11. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00868 . Retrieved 6 February 2026.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  92. Bellamy, Christopher (3 June 1996). "Sixty secret mustard gas sites uncovered". The Independent.
  93. "Britain's 'Anthrax Island'". BBC News. 25 July 2001.
  94. Hapke, H.-J. (1996). "Heavy metal transfer in the food chain to humans". Fertilizers and Environment. pp. 431–436. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1586-2_73. ISBN   978-94-010-7210-6.
  95. 1 2 Rodríguez Eugenio, Natalia (2021). "Environmental, health and socio-economic impacts of soil pollution". Global assessment of soil pollution: Report. doi:10.4060/cb4894en. ISBN   978-92-5-134469-9.
  96. "Scientists warn of links between soil pollution and heart disease". ScienceDaily (Press release). European Society of Cardiology. 1 July 2022.
  97. Michael Hogan, Leda Patmore, Gary Latshaw and Harry Seidman Computer modelng of pesticide transport in soil for five instrumented watersheds, prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Southeast Water laboratory, Athens, Ga. by ESL Inc., Sunnyvale, California (1973)
  98. Jayaraj, Ravindran; Megha, Pankajshan; Sreedev, Puthur (December 2016). "Organochlorine pesticides, their toxic effects on living organisms and their fate in the environment". Interdisciplinary Toxicology. 9 (3–4): 90–100. doi:10.1515/intox-2016-0012. PMC   5464684 . PMID   28652852.
  99. Bussian, Bernd M.; Rodríguez Eugenio, Natalia; Wilson, Susan C. (2021). "The chemical nature and properties of soil contaminants". Global assessment of soil pollution: Report. doi:10.4060/cb4894en. ISBN   978-92-5-134469-9.
  100. Rijk, Ingrid J. C.; Ekblad, Alf (April 2020). "Carbon and nitrogen cycling in a lead polluted grassland evaluated using stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) and microbial, plant and soil parameters". Plant and Soil. 449 (1–2): 249–266. Bibcode:2020PlSoi.449..249R. doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04467-7 . S2CID   212689936.
  101. Alloway, Brian J., ed. (2013). Heavy Metals in Soils. Environmental Pollution. Vol. 22. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4470-7. ISBN   978-94-007-4469-1.[ page needed ]
  102. S.K. Gupta, C.T. Kincaid, P.R. Mayer, C.A. Newbill and C.R. Cole, "A multidimensional finite element code for the analysis of coupled fluid, energy and solute transport", Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory PNL-2939, EPA contract 68-03-3116 (1982)
  103. Agarwal, A.; Liu, Y. (2015). "Remediation technologies for oil-contaminated sediments". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 101 (2): 483–490. Bibcode:2015MarPB.101..483A. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.010. PMID   26414316.
  104. Agarwal, Ashutosh; Zhou, Yufeng; Liu, Yu (December 2016). "Remediation of oil-contaminated sand with self-collapsing air microbubbles". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 23 (23): 23876–23883. Bibcode:2016ESPR...2323876A. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7601-5. PMID   27628704.
  105. Wu, Pan; Wu, Xuan; Xu, Haolan; Owens, Gary (2021-09-05). "Interfacial solar evaporation driven lead removal from a contaminated soil". EcoMat. 3 (5) e12140. doi: 10.1002/eom2.12140 . hdl: 11541.2/29296 . S2CID   239680091.
  106. Xu, Qi (29 January 2007). "Facing up to 'invisible pollution'". Dialogue Earth.
  107. Zhao, Fang-Jie; Ma, Yibing; Zhu, Yong-Guan; Tang, Zhong; McGrath, Steve P. (20 January 2015). "Soil Contamination in China: Current Status and Mitigation Strategies". Environmental Science & Technology. 49 (2): 750–759. Bibcode:2015EnST...49..750Z. doi:10.1021/es5047099. PMID   25514502.
  108. 1 2 Panagos, Panos; Liedekerke, Marc Van; Yigini, Yusuf; Montanarella, Luca (2013). "Contaminated Sites in Europe: Review of the Current Situation Based on Data Collected through a European Network". Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2013 158764. doi: 10.1155/2013/158764 . PMC   3697397 . PMID   23843802.
  109. Jannik, T.; Stagich, B. (25 May 2017). Land and Water Use Characteristics and Human Health Input Parameters for use in Environmental Dosimetry and Risk Assessments at the Savannah River Site 2017 Update (Report). doi:10.2172/1365658.
  110. "www.ContaminatedLAND.co.uk - ICRCL 59/83 Trigger Concentrations". Archived from the original on 2016-10-09. Retrieved 2016-05-04.
  111. "What are "Soil Guideline Values" and which should I use?". Manaaki Whenua. 10 August 2019. Retrieved 2022-07-10.
  112. "LCRM: Stage 1 risk assessment". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2022-07-10.
  113. Sun, Yiming; Wang, Jicai; Guo, Guanlin; Li, Hong; Jones, Kevin (January 2020). "A comprehensive comparison and analysis of soil screening values derived and used in China and the UK". Environmental Pollution. 256 113404. Bibcode:2020EPoll.25613404S. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113404. PMID   31735398.
  114. "Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory: Find Sites by Province or Territory". Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. January 1994.
  115. Hutchinson, T. C.; Whitby, L. M. (1974). "Heavy-metal Pollution in the Sudbury Mining and Smelting Region of Canada, I. Soil and Vegetation Contamination by Nickel, Copper, and Other Metals". Environmental Conservation. 1 (2): 123–132. Bibcode:1974EnvCo...1..123H. doi:10.1017/S0376892900004240. S2CID   86686979.
  116. Yadav, Priya (2 April 2009). "Uranium deforms kids in Faridkot". The Times of India.
  117. Jolly, Asit (2 April 2009). "Punjab disability 'uranium link'". BBC News.
  118. Uranium in Ground Water Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India (2012)
  119. Atomic Energy Report – Malwa Punjab Uranium Q&A Archived 2014-02-28 at the Wayback Machine Lok Sabha, Government of India (2012)

Further reading