History of public health in the United Kingdom

Last updated

History of public health in the United Kingdom covers Public health in the United Kingdom since about 1700.

Contents


18th century

With the onset of the Industrial Revolution, living standards amongst the working population began to worsen, with cramped and unsanitary urban conditions. A severe long-term shortage of cheap housing led to the rapid growth of slums, The death rate began to rise alarmingly, almost doubling in Birmingham and Liverpool. Thomas Malthus warned of the dangers of overpopulation in 1798. His ideas, as well as those of Jeremy Bentham, became very influential in government circles in the early years of the 19th century. [1] The latter part of the century brought the establishment of the basic pattern of improvements in public health over the next two centuries: a social evil was identified, private philanthropists brought attention to it, and changing public opinion led to government action. [1]

The practice of medicine grew rapidly in the 18th century, as seen in the rapid growth in voluntary hospitals in England. [2] The acceptance of vaccination quickly followed the pioneering work of Edward Jenner in treating smallpox. James Lind's discovery of the causes of scurvy amongst sailors and its mitigation via the introduction of fruit on lengthy voyages was published in 1754 and led to the adoption of this idea by the Royal Navy. [3]

Efforts were also made to promulgate health matters to the broader public; in 1752 the British physician Sir John Pringle published Observations on the Diseases of the Army in Camp and Garrison, in which he advocated for the importance of adequate ventilation in the barracks and the provision of latrines for the soldiers. [4]

Infant mortality

Infant mortality in the United Kingdom underwent a dramatic decline from 1700 to 2025. Good national statistics be]gin in 1837; before then historians use local studies. [5]

In the early 18th century, infant mortality rates were extremely high:

19th century

Infant mortality

Historians have developed estimates before 1837 for localities. Finallyin that year the introduction of civil registration of births and deaths enabled the tracking of infant mortality by date, location and cause. [8]

The 19th century saw substantial improvements in infant survival:

Legislation

A series of laws passed by Parliament and affecting England and Wales marked a shift towards proactive public health measures. They concerned sanitation, disease prevention, and living conditions in urban areas, as well as national and local rules of oversight. [12] [13] "Sanitary reform," was a common refrain of Conservative politicians in their landslide victory in 1874. Liberal politicians tended to ridicule it, but Disraeli had a broader vision of 'sanitary' stating: "that phrase so little understood [included] most of the civilizing influences of humanity." What the voters really wanted, in Disraeli's opinion, was healthier conditions at home and at work, and across their towns. [14]

Urban crisis

In the first four decades of the 19th century alone, London's population doubled and even greater growth rates were recorded in the new industrial towns, such as Leeds and Manchester. From 1801 to 1851, the proportion of Englanders living in cities over 20,000 more than doubled from 17% to 38%. [18]

This rapid urbanization exacerbated the spread of disease in the large conurbations that built up around the workhouses and factories. These settlements were cramped and primitive with no organized sanitation. Disease was inevitable and its incubation in these areas was encouraged by the poor lifestyle of the inhabitants. Not enough new housing was built, and people squeezed into small, dirty apartments, and drank dirty water. One result was high rates of tuberculosis, which became leading cause of death. [19]

19th Century Court Housing Liverpool Court housing Liverpool.jpg
19th Century Court Housing Liverpool

Liverpool.

Very rapid population growth from rural England, and especially from Ireland firing the famine years 1847-1852, led to severe overcrowding and very poor sanitation. The city faced several cholera outbreaks. Housing in Liverpool]] was dark, poorly ventilated, damp and overcrowded, with no provision for human or horse waste. Liverpool had not only the worst type of cellar dwelling, but also a larger proportion of its inhabitants living in cellars than any other city in the UK. The people living in court housing made use of privies and it was common practice to dispose of the contents by spreading them over the courts. As a result., many of the cellar dwellers were routinely knee deep in sewage. [20]

These hardships galvanized public health reforms and philanthropic efforts. Reformers led by William Rathbone worked tirelessly to improve healthcare and education. In 1822 a commission of sewers was established and over the next 20 years built 30 miles of sewers, but these were for surface water drainage only, houses did not connect to their drains. [21]

William Henry Duncan (1805–1863) was Medical Officer of Health (1847-1863). He was the first Medical Officer anywhere in the UK. He worked energetically to upgrade the city's sanitation, especially in the face of overwhelming migration from Ireland during the great famine of 1845 to 1852. [22]

Chadwick and sanitation solutions

Edwin Chadwick (1800–1890) identified the public health issues in crowded cities and led major reforms in urban sanitation and public health. He pioneered the use of systematic surveys to identify all phases of a complex social problem, and pioneered the use of systematic long-term inspection programmes to make sure the reforms operated as planned. Following a serious outbreak of typhus in 1838, Chadwick convinced the Poor Law Board that an enquiry was urgently required. Chadwick sent questionnaires to every Poor Law Union, and talked to surveyors, builders, prison governors, police officers and factory inspectors to obtain additional data about the lives of the poor. He edited the information himself, and prepared it for publication in 1842 at his own expense. It became a best-seller. His Report on The Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain caught the public imagination and was soon incorporated into English law. [23] [24] [25]

Chadwick argued eight main points, emphasizing the absolute necessity of better water supplies and of a drainage system to remove waste, as ways to lower the death rate. He saw that every house needed a permanent water supply, rather than the intermittent supplies from standpipes that were often provided. He proposed each house would have a constant water supply, and privies would ensure that soil was discharged into egg-shaped sewers, to be carried away and spread on the land as manure, preventing rivers from becoming polluted. Chadwick understood that both water supply and drainage were important, since there had to be enough sewers to carry the waste away. Chadwick later helped to ensure that the Waterworks Clauses Act of 1847 limited profits, and required them to provide a constant supply of wholesome water for houses, and a supply for cleansing sewers and watering streets. [26]

Dirt causes miasma that cause cholera

Cholera was the main concern. [27] Officials knew that the disease had hit India hard in 1818 and was steadily progressing westward. There was no known cure, and about a third of he patients died. Doctors assumed it was caused by breathing "miasma"--mysterious air particles produced by rotting waste. Sanitation using sewers to move out all the waste was seen as the solution. Early on no one realized it was caused by a germ that passed through the water supply from person to person. The first case appeared in England in 1833. A quarantine was imposed on shipping in the seaports, much to the dismay of merchants and sailors. By 1832 there were 52,000 deaths, including 10,000 in Edinburgh and Glasgow alone. It focused on cities but not on social status; the victims represented every class of society. Local governments ordered whitewashing houses with chloride of lime or burning barrels of tar in the streets in order to dissipate the supposed miasma causing. the disease. The epidemics petered out, then reappeared every few years. Major cholera epidemics struck Britain in 1848–1849 with 70,000 deaths; 1853–1854 with 30,000 deaths; and 1866 with 18,000 deaths. [28] [29] [30]

John Snow discovers the cause
A replica of the famous London pump --when John Snow closed it down the cholera epidemic stopped John Snow memorial and pub.jpg
A replica of the famous London pump --when John Snow closed it down the cholera epidemic stopped

Chadwick was working on removing the waste and dirt as the solution but exactly what was causing the disease was not known until the work of John Snow in 1854. [31] That year there was a severe outbreak of cholera in the upper class Soho district of western London. It was part of the 1846–1860 cholera pandemic happening worldwide. It prompted Snow to map the homes of people who got sick in Soho and show they had all been drinking water that came from one neighborhood pump in Broad Street. Everyone breathed the same air but only some people used that particular pump and only its users got sick. He then deduced germ-contaminated water was the source of all the cholera cases. Snow's maps were a powerful confirmation of the Germ theory of disease, and explained how the germs spread. Doctors could now discard the old airborne "Miasma theory". [32] [33] Snow's great discovery decisively influenced public health policies and quickly led to the construction of improved sanitation facilities. The term "focus of infection" started to be used to describe sites, such as one particular water pump in Broad Street that spread the cholera germs. [34]

London sewers

Sir Joseph Bazalgette was the Chief Engineer of London's Metropolitan Board of Works, 1856–1889. His major achievement was the creation of a sewerage system for central London, in response to the Great Stink of 1858. His solution in 1864–1875 was to construct a network of 82 miles (132 km) of enclosed underground brick main sewers to intercept sewage outflows, and 1,100 miles (1,800 km) of street sewers, to divert the raw sewage which flowed freely through the streets and thoroughfares of London to the river. His system proved instrumental in relieving the city of cholera epidemics, while beginning to clean the River Thames. [35]

Impact of sanitation

Historians have been using quantitative models to estimate the impact of investment in sanitation and pure water supplies on health indicators. One study of 16 cities outside London indicates that for 1845–1884, the first round of sanitation investments were associated with sharp declines in infant and child mortality, and a 13% decline in overall mortality. However subsequent rounds of spending in the same cities gave a much smaller decline. [36]

1870-1918

By the late-1880s, the Industrial Revolution had created new technologies and new industrial cities that changed the way people lived. The growth of industry shifts in manufacturing factories, special-purpose machinery and technological innovations, which led to increased productivity. Gender roles shifted as women made use of the new technology to upgrade their lifestyle and their career opportunities.

Mortality declined steadily in urban England and Wales 1870–1917. Robert Millward and Frances N. Bell looked statistically at those factors in the physical environment (especially population density and overcrowding) that raised death rates directly, as well as indirect factors such as price and income movements that affected expenditures on sewers, water supplies, food, and medical staff. The statistical data show that increases in the incomes of households and increases in town tax revenues helped cause the decline of mortality. [37]

The new money permitted higher spending on food, and also on a wide range of health-enhancing goods and services such as medical care. The major improvement in the physical environment was the quality of the housing stock, which rose faster than the population; its quality was increasingly regulated by central and local government. [37] Infant mortality fell faster in England and Wales than in Scotland. Clive Lee argues that one factor was the continued overcrowding in Scotland's housing. [38] During the First World War, infant mortality fell sharply across the country. J. M. Winter attributes this to the full employment and higher wages paid to war workers. [39] In 1901-1910, infant mortality became a focus of public health concerns, with more detailed reporting and analysis. [40] [41] The Midwives Act of 1902 regulated midwifery, in order to ensure safer childbirth practices. [42]

Since 1919

Nursing

The number of nurses rose rapidly in the 20th century. According to the 1901 United Kingdom census, there were 64,000 women nurses, along with 5,000 men. Of the total, 12,500 were trained or registered. By 1921 there were 110,000 women and 12,000 men in nursing, 25,000 were trained or registered. By 1939 there were 160,000 nurses in all, of whom 60,000 were trained and registered. [43]

Infant mortality

The 20th century witnessed further declines in infant mortality: [44]

Factors in decline

Multiple factors contributed to the overall decline in infant mortality: Historians emphasize that progress was not always linear. For example, there were periods of stagnation and even slight increases in infant mortality rates, particularly in urban areas during rapid industrialization [46]

  • * Advancements in citywide sanitation and public health measures. Improvements in infant care, particularly in antenatal and neonatal care. [47]
  • Changes in breastfeeding practices and infant feeding methods. [48]
  • Reduction in specific diseases, especially smallpox and yellow fever after 1750. [49]

Role of philanthropy

In the 1920s government public health funding concentrated on upgrading public infrastructure and helping wounded war veterans. Meanwhile, a number of private philanthropies took roles in public health. They were not funded by the government and ranged from major international operations such as the Rockefeller Foundation, to membership groups like the Order of Saint John, to small local charities. Rockefeller sponsored training programs for visiting nurses. The others focused on individual needs at the neighborhood level, such as helping poor families with childbirth and child welfare and dealing with tuberculosis, or providing ambulance services to hospitals for victims of traffic accidents. [50]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 Rhodes P, Bryant JH (20 May 2019). "Public Health". Encyclopædia Britannica.
  2. Carruthers GB, Carruthers LA (2005). A History of Britain's Hospitals. Book Guild Publishers. ISBN   978-1-85776-905-0.
  3. Vale B (May 2008). "The Conquest of Scurvy in the Royal Navy 1793–1800: A Challenge to Current Orthodoxy". The Mariner's Mirror . 94 (2): 160–175. doi:10.1080/00253359.2008.10657052.
  4. Selwyn S (July 1966). "Sir John Pringle: hospital reformer, moral philosopher and pioneer of antiseptics". Medical History. 10 (3): 266–274. doi:10.1017/s0025727300011133. PMC   1033606 . PMID   5330009.
  5. Chris Galley, Infant Mortality in England, 1538-2000 (Local Population Studies Society. 2023), pp. 8-10. online
  6. Romola Jane Davenport, "Infant-feeding practices and infant survival by familial wealth in London, 1752–1812." The History of the Family 24.1 (2019): 174-206. [e: https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2019.1580601 online]
  7. Romola J. Davenport, "Mortality, migration and epidemiological change in English cities, 1600–1870." International Journal of Paleopathology 34 (2021): 37-49. online
  8. E.A. Wrigley and E. Anthony. "How reliable is our knowledge of the demographic characteristics of the English population in the early modern period?." The Historical Journal 40.3 (1997): 571-595.
  9. Davenport (2019).
  10. Chris Galley, "Infant Mortality in England, 1538-2000: Stability and the Beginnings of Change, 1837-1910." Local Population Studies 106 (2021). online
  11. Galley (2021).
  12. W. M. Frazer, A history of English public health, 1834–1939 (1950) pp.31–112.
  13. Chris Day. "‘The Law of The Board of Health’ Rhetoric, Failure and Public Health in the English Periphery, c. 1848–1875." Family & Community History 26.3 (2023): 218-234.
  14. William Flavelle Moneypenny and George Earl Buckle, The Life of Benjamin Disraeli Earl of Beaconsfield (1929) volume, 2, p. 703.
  15. Martin Exner, "Edwin Chadwick and the Public Health Act 1848: Principal architect of sanitary reform." in Routledge Handbook of Water and Health (2015) pp. 699-705.
  16. C. Hamlin, and S. Sheard, "Revolutions in public health: 1848, and 1998" BMJ (1998) ;317(7158):587-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7158.587. PMID: 9721121; PMCID: PMC1113797.
  17. Ro Jo Lambert, " A Victorian National Health Service: State Vaccination, 1855–71." The Historical Journal 5.1 (1962): 1-18. online
  18. Rosen p 202.
  19. Romola J. Davenport, "Urbanization and mortality in Britain, c. 1800–50." Economic History Review 73.2 (2020): 455-485. online
  20. Gerry Kearns, "Town Hall and Whitehall: sanitary intelligence in Liverpool, 1840–63." Body and City (Routledge, 2017) pp.. 89-108.
  21. Bertie Dockerill, "Liverpool Corporation and the origins of municipal social housing, 1842–1890." Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire 165 (2016): 39-56. online
  22. Halliday, S. (2003). "Duncan of Liverpool: Britain's first Medical Officer". Journal of Medical Biography . 11 (3): 142–149. doi:10.1177/096777200301100307. PMID   12870037. S2CID   21967666.
  23. G. M. Binnie, Early Victorian Water Engineers (Thomas Telford, 1981) pp 4–5.
  24. S.E. Finer, The life and times of Sir Edwin Chadwick (1952) excerpt 209-242.
  25. For the text of Report of Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for the Home Department, from the Poor Law Commissioners, on an Inquiry into the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain; with appendices see online copy..
  26. Binnie, pp=7-23.
  27. Rebessa Stieva,  "Public Health Interventions in Historical Perspective: Cholera in Victorian London, 1849, 1854, and 1866" (PhD dissertation, McGill University (Canada) ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,  2023. 31078784).
  28. David Taylor, Mastering economic and social history (1988) pp. 306–307.
  29. Geoff Gill, "Cholera and the fight for public health reform in mid-Victorian England." Historian 66 (2000): 10+ online
  30. A popular history is Amanda J.Thomas, Cholera: the Victorian plague (2015) [online
  31. Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity (1997) pp. 412–413.
  32. Eyeler, William (July 2001). "The changing assessments of John Snow's and William Farr's Cholera Studies". Sozial- und Präventivmedizin. 46 (4): 225–32. doi: 10.1007/BF01593177 . PMID   11582849. S2CID   9549345.
  33. Sandra Hempel, The Medical Detective: John Snow, Cholera, and the Mystery of the Broad Street Pump (Granta Books, 2006).
  34. George Rosen, A History of Public Health (1958) pp. 285–288,
  35. Gordon Charles Cook, "Construction of London's Victorian sewers: the vital role of Joseph Bazalgette." Postgraduate Medical Journal 77.914 (2001): 802-804. online
  36. Toke S. Aidt, Romola J. Davenport, and Felix Gray. "New perspectives on the contribution of sanitary investments to mortality decline in English cities, 1845–1909." Economic History Review 76.2 (2023): 624-660. online See also M. Alsan and C. Goldin, "Watersheds in child mortality: the role of effective water and sewerage infrastructure, 1880 to 1920" Journal of Political Economy 127 (2019), pp. 586–638 on the pattern in Massachusetts.
  37. 1 2 Millward, Robert; Bell, Frances N. (1998). "Economic factors in the decline of mortality in late nineteenth century Britain". European Review of Economic History. 2 (3): 263–288. doi:10.1017/S1361491698000124. JSTOR   41377834.
  38. Clive H. Lee, "Regional inequalities in infant mortality in Britain, 1861–1971: patterns and hypotheses." Population Studies 45.1 (1991): 55–65.
  39. J. M. Winter, "Aspects of the impact of the First World War on infant mortality in Britain." Journal of European Economic History 11.3 (1982): 713.
  40. Galley (2021).
  41. See [https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/infant-and-neonatal-mortality "Stillbirths and neonatal and infant mortality" (Quality Watch, 2024)
  42. Pamela Dale, and Kate Fisher. "Implementing the 1902 Midwives Act: assessing problems, developing services and creating a new role for a variety of female practitioners." Women's History Review 18.3 (2009): 427–452. online
  43. Steven Cherry, "Medicine and public health, 1900–1939" in Chris Wrigley, ed., A Companion to Early Twentieth Century Britain (2003) pp. 405–423, data at page 413.
  44. Wallis Taylor, "The changing pattern of mortality in England and Wales: I. Infant Mortality." British Journal of Preventive & Social Medicine 8.1 (1954): 1-9 PMID   13140835 online covers 1911-1950
  45. See "U.K. Infant Mortality Rate 1950-2025"
  46. [https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/childhoodinfantandperinatalmortalityinenglandandwales/2022 Census2021, "Child and infant mortality in England and Wales: 2022" (2024)
  47. Galley (2023)
  48. Davenport (2021).
  49. See R.J. Davenport et al, "Infant mortality by social status in Georgian London: a test of the ‘epidemiological integration’ model," (Working paper, December 13 2013) online.
  50. Barry Doyle, "Voluntary organizations and the provision of health services in England and France, 1917–29." European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire 30.5 (2023): 791-811.

Further reading

Biographical

Historiography

Primary sources

External links.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infant mortality</span> Death of children under the age of 1

Infant mortality is the death of an infant before the infant's first birthday. The occurrence of infant mortality in a population can be described by the infant mortality rate (IMR), which is the number of deaths of infants under one year of age per 1,000 live births. Similarly, the child mortality rate, also known as the under-five mortality rate, compares the death rate of children up to the age of five.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Miasma theory</span> Obsolete medical theory about the transmission of disease through bad air

The miasma theory is an abandoned medical theory that held that diseases—such as cholera, chlamydia, or the Black Death—were caused by a miasma, a noxious form of "bad air", also known as night air. The theory held that epidemics were caused by miasma, emanating from rotting organic matter. Though miasma theory is typically associated with the spread of contagious diseases, some academics in the early nineteenth century suggested that the theory extended to other conditions as well, e.g. one could become obese by inhaling the odor of food.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Farr</span> British epidemiologist (1807–1883)

William Farr CB was a British epidemiologist, regarded as one of the founders of medical statistics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edwin Chadwick</span> British social reformer (1800–1890)

Sir Edwin Chadwick KCB was an English social reformer who is noted for his leadership in reforming the Poor Laws in England and instituting major reforms in urban sanitation and public health. A disciple of Utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham, he was most active between 1832 and 1854; after that he held minor positions, and his views were largely ignored. Chadwick pioneered the use of scientific surveys to identify all phases of a complex social problem, and pioneered the use of systematic long-term inspection programmes to make sure the reforms operated as planned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public health</span> Promoting health through informed choices

Public health is "the science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life and promoting health through the organized efforts and informed choices of society, organizations, public and private, communities and individuals". Analyzing the determinants of health of a population and the threats it faces is the basis for public health. The public can be as small as a handful of people or as large as a village or an entire city; in the case of a pandemic it may encompass several continents. The concept of health takes into account physical, psychological, and social well-being, among other factors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Stink</span> 1858 pollution event in central London

The Great Stink was an event in Central London during July and August 1858 in which the hot weather exacerbated the smell of untreated human waste and industrial effluent that was present on the banks of the River Thames. The problem had been mounting for some years, with an ageing and inadequate sewer system that emptied directly into the Thames. The miasma from the effluent was thought to transmit contagious diseases, and three outbreaks of cholera before the Great Stink were blamed on the ongoing problems with the river.

A local board of health was a local authority in urban areas of England and Wales from 1848 to 1894. They were formed in response to cholera epidemics and were given powers to control sewers, clean the streets, regulate environmental health risks including slaughterhouses and ensure the proper supply of water to their districts. Local boards were eventually merged with the corporations of municipal boroughs in 1873, or became urban districts in 1894.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Henry Duncan</span> English doctor

William Henry Duncan, also known as Doctor Duncan, was an English doctor who worked in Liverpool as its first Medical Officer of Health.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of waste management</span>

Waste management has been a concern for human civilizations throughout history. The earliest known wastewater management system dates back to around 6500 BCE in present-day Syria, featuring sophisticated gutter systems and settling chambers. Ancient civilizations like the Roman Empire developed complex waste removal systems, including the Cloaca Maxima, which emptied into the Tiber River. The Maya of Central America had monthly rituals for burning garbage. However, access to these early waste management systems was often limited to higher socioeconomic classes.

Health in the United Kingdom refers to the overall health of the population of the United Kingdom. This includes overall trends such as life expectancy and mortality rates, mental health of the population and the suicide rate, smoking rates, alcohol consumption, prevalence of diseases within the population and obesity in the United Kingdom. Three of these – smoking rates, alcohol consumption and obesity – were above the OECD average in 2015.

Health in Iraq refers to the country's public healthcare system and the overall health of the country's population. Iraq belongs to WHO health region Eastern Mediterranean and classified as upper middle according to World Bank income classification 2013. The state of health in Iraq has fluctuated during its turbulent recent history and specially during the last 4 decade. The country had one of the highest medical standards in the region during the period of 1980s and up until 1991, the annual total health budget was about $450 million in average. The 1991 Gulf War incurred Iraq's major infrastructures a huge damage. This includes health care system, sanitation, transport, water and electricity supplies. UN economic sanctions aggravated the process of deterioration. The annual total health budget for the country, a decade after the sanctions had fallen to $22 million which is barely 5% of what it was in 1980s. During its last decade, the regime of Saddam Hussein cut public health funding by 90 percent, contributing to a substantial deterioration in health care. During that period, maternal mortality increased nearly threefold, and the salaries of medical personnel decreased drastically. Medical facilities, which in 1980 were among the best in the Middle East, deteriorated. Conditions were especially serious in the south, where malnutrition and water-borne diseases became common in the 1990s. Health indicators deteriorated during the 1990s. In the late 1990s, Iraq's infant mortality rates more than doubled. Because treatment and diagnosis of cancer and diabetes decreased in the 1990s, complications and deaths resulting from those diseases increased drastically in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Robert Cornish</span> English physician (1828–1896)

William Robert Cornish was a British physician who served in India for more than thirty years, and became the Surgeon-General—head of medical services—in the Madras Presidency. During the Great Famine of 1876–78, Cornish, then Sanitary Commissioner of Madras, argued for generous famine relief, which put him at odds with Sir Richard Temple, Famine Envoy for the Government of India, who was promoting reduced rations. Some of Cornish's innovations made their way into the Indian Famine Codes of the late 19th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Henry Corfield (hygienist)</span> English public health physician and hygienist

William Henry Corfield was an English public health physician. Appointed Professor of Hygiene and Public Health at University College London in 1869, Corfield had a major influence on public health and household sanitation in Victorian England before there was extensive knowledge of bacteriology and a clear understanding of infectious disease transmission. He was also an early advocate of land filtration and sewage farms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sheppard–Towner Act</span> 1921 Act of the United States Congress that provided funding for maternity and child care

The Promotion of the Welfare and Hygiene of Maternity and Infancy Act, more commonly known as the Sheppard–Towner Act, was a 1921 U.S. Act of Congress that provided federal funding for maternity and childcare. It was sponsored by Senator Morris Sheppard (D) of Texas and Representative Horace Mann Towner (R) of Iowa and signed by President Warren G. Harding on November 23, 1921. It went out of effect in 1929.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of water supply and sanitation</span>

The history of water supply and sanitation is one of a logistical challenge to provide clean water and sanitation systems since the dawn of civilization. Where water resources, infrastructure or sanitation systems were insufficient, diseases spread and people fell sick or died prematurely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of medicine in the United States</span>

The history of medicine in the United States encompasses a variety of approaches to health care in the United States spanning from colonial days to the present. These interpretations of medicine vary from early folk remedies that fell under various different medical systems to the increasingly standardized and professional managed care of modern biomedicine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Sanitary Branch (Ghana)</span> Early form of Ghanas Ministry of Health

The Sanitary Branch of Ghana, established in 1910, was formed as a branch of the country's Medical Department when Ghana was a colony under the British. Today, the Ministry of Health in Ghana works to improve the health of the nation's citizens through the formulation of policies and introduction of programs aimed at promoting and increasing accessibility to health care. It functions in conjunction with the Ghanaian government, and overall works toward the continual development of the nation as a whole. The beginnings of a national health care system, currently in the form of the Ministry of Health, can be traced to the late 1800s and early 1900s. The British influence in Ghana marked the beginnings of a structured health care system with the implementation of the Medical Department, which included the formation of the Sanitary Branch.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diseases and epidemics of the 19th century</span>

Diseases and epidemics of the 19th century included long-standing epidemic threats such as smallpox, typhus, yellow fever, and scarlet fever. In addition, cholera emerged as an epidemic threat and spread worldwide in six pandemics in the nineteenth century.

A pre-regulation terraced house is a type of dwelling constructed before Public Health Act 1875. It is a type of British terraced house at the opposite end of the social scale from the aristocratic townhouse, built as cheap accommodation for the urban poor of the Industrial Revolution. The term usually refers to houses built in the century before the 1875 Act, which imposed a duty on local authorities to regulate housing by the use of byelaws. Subsequently, all byelaw terraced housing was required to meet minimum standards of build quality, ventilation, sanitation and population density. Almost all pre-regulation terraced housing has been demolished through successive waves of slum clearance.

The history of public health in the United states studies the US history of public health roles of the medical and nursing professions; scientific research; municipal sanitation; the agencies of local, state and federal governments; and private philanthropy. It looks at pandemics and epidemics and relevant responses with special attention to age, gender and race. It covers developments from the colonial era to the late 20th century in the United States and its main overseas possessions and its military roles overseas.