Uranium in the environment

Last updated

Uranium in the environment is a global health concern, and comes from both natural and man-made sources. Beyond naturally occurring uranium, mining, phosphates in agriculture, weapons manufacturing, and nuclear power are anthropogenic sources of uranium in the environment. [1]

Contents

In the natural environment, radioactivity of uranium is generally low, [1] but uranium is a toxic metal that can disrupt normal functioning of the kidney, brain, liver, heart, and numerous other systems. [2] Chemical toxicity can cause public health issues when uranium is present in groundwater, especially if concentrations in food and water are increased by mining activity. [1] The biological half-life (the average time it takes for the human body to eliminate half the amount in the body) for uranium is about 15 days. [3]

Uranium's radioactivity can present health and environmental issues in the case of nuclear waste produced by nuclear power plants or weapons manufacturing.

Uranium is weakly radioactive and remains so because of its long physical half-life (4.468 billion years for uranium-238). The use of depleted uranium (DU) in munitions is controversial because of questions about potential long-term health effects. [4] [5]

Natural occurrence

Uranium ore UraniumUSGOV.jpg
Uranium ore

Uranium is a naturally occurring element found at low levels within all rock, soil, and water. This is the highest-numbered element to be found naturally in significant quantities on Earth. According to the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation the normal concentration of uranium in soil is 300 μg/kg to 11.7 mg/kg. [6]

It is considered to be more plentiful than antimony, beryllium, cadmium, gold, mercury, silver, or tungsten and is about as abundant as tin, arsenic or molybdenum. It is found in many minerals including uraninite (the most common uranium ore), autunite, uranophane, torbernite, and coffinite. [7] There are significant concentrations of uranium in some substances, such as phosphate rock deposits, and minerals such as lignite, and monazite sands in uranium-rich ores. (It is recovered commercially from these sources.) Coal fly ash from uranium-bearing coal is particularly rich in uranium, and there have been several proposals to "mine" this waste product for its uranium content. [8] [9] Because some of the ash produced in a coal power plant escapes through the smokestack, the radioactive contamination released by coal power plants in normal operation is actually higher than that of nuclear power plants. [10] [11]

Seawater contains about 3.3 parts per billion (3.3 μg/kg of uranium by weight or 3.3 micrograms per liter). [12]

Sources of uranium

Mining and milling

Mining is the largest source of uranium contamination in the environment. [1] Uranium milling creates radioactive waste in the form of tailings, which contain uranium, radium, and polonium. Consequently, uranium mining results in "the unavoidable radioactive contamination of the environment by solid, liquid and gaseous wastes". [13]

Seventy percent of global uranium resources are on or adjacent to traditional[ clarification needed ] lands belonging to Indigenous people, and perceived environmental risks associated with uranium mining have resulted in environmental conflicts involving multiple actors, in which local campaigns have become national or international debates. [14]

Some of these environmental conflicts have limited uranium exploration. Incidents at Ranger Uranium Mine in the Northern Territory of Australia and disputes over Indigenous land rights led to increased opposition to development of the nearby Jabiluka deposits and suspension of that project in the early 2000s. Similarly, environmental damage from Uranium mining on traditional Navajo lands in the southwestern United States resulted in restrictions on additional mining in Navajo lands in 2005. [14]

Occupational hazards

The radiation hazards of uranium mining and milling were not appreciated in the early years, resulting in workers being exposed to high levels of radiation. Inhalation of radon gas caused sharp increases in lung cancers among underground uranium miners employed in the 1940s and 1950s. [15]

Military activity

DU penetrator from the PGU-14/B incendiary 30 mm round 30mm DU slug.jpg
DU penetrator from the PGU-14/B incendiary 30 mm round

Military activity is a source of uranium, especially at nuclear or munitions testing sites. Depleted uranium (DU) is a byproduct of uranium enrichment that is used for defensive armor plating and armor-piercing projectiles. Uranium contamination has been found at testing sites in the UK, in Kazakhstan, and in several countries as a result of DU munitions used in the Gulf War and the Yugoslav wars. [1] During a three-week period of conflict in 2003 in Iraq, 1,000 to 2,000 tonnes of DU munitions were used. [16]

Combustion and impact of DU munitions can produce aerosols that disperse uranium metal into the air and water where it can be inhaled or ingested by humans. [17] A United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) study has expressed concerns about groundwater contamination from these munitions. [18] Studies of DU aerosol exposure suggest that uranium particles would quickly settle out of the air, [19] and thus should not affect populations more than a few kilometres from target areas. [17]

Sites in Kosovo and southern Central Serbia where NATO aviation used depleted uranium munitions during 1999 bombing Kosovo uranium NATO bombing1999.png
Sites in Kosovo and southern Central Serbia where NATO aviation used depleted uranium munitions during 1999 bombing

Nuclear energy and waste

The nuclear power industry is also a source of uranium in the environment in the form of radioactive waste or through nuclear accidents such as Three Mile Island or the Chernobyl disaster. [14] Perceived risks of contamination associated with this industry contribute to the anti-nuclear movement. [14]

In 2020, there were over 250,000 metric tons of high-level radioactive waste being stored globally in temporary containers. This waste is produced by nuclear power plants and weapons facilities, and is a serious human health and environmental issue. There are plans to permanently dispose of high-level waste in deep geological repositories, but none of these are operational. Corrosion of aging temporary containers has caused some waste to leak into the environment. [20]

As spent uranium dioxide fuel is very insoluble in water, it is likely to release uranium (and fission products) even more slowly than borosilicate glass when in contact with water. [21]

Health effects

Tiron Tiron.svg
Tiron

Soluble uranium salts are toxic, though less so than those of other heavy metals such as lead or mercury. The organ which is most affected is the kidney. Soluble uranium salts are readily excreted in the urine, although some accumulation in the kidneys does occur in the case of chronic exposure. The World Health Organization has established a daily "tolerated intake" of soluble uranium salts for the general public of 0.5 μg/kg body weight (or 35 μg for a 70 kg adult): exposure at this level is not thought to lead to any significant kidney damage. [22] [23]

Tiron may be used to remove uranium from the human body, in a form of chelation therapy. [24] Bicarbonate may also be used as uranium (VI) forms complexes with the carbonate ion.

Public health

Uranium mining produces toxic tailings that are radioactive and may contain other toxic elements such as radon. Dust and water leaving tailing sites may carry long-lived radioactive elements that enter water sources and the soil, increase background radiation, and eventually be ingested by humans and animals. A 2013 analysis in a medical journal found that, "The effects of all these sources of contamination on human health will be subtle and widespread, and therefore difficult to detect both clinically and epidemiologically." [25] A 2019 analysis of the global uranium industry said that the industry was shifting mining activities toward the Global South where environmental regulations are typically less stringent; and that people in impacted communities would "surely experience adverse environmental consequences" and public health issues arising from mining activities carried out by powerful multi-national corporations or mining companies based in foreign countries. [26]

Cancer

In 1950, the US Public Health service began a comprehensive study of uranium miners, leading to the first publication of a statistical correlation between cancer and uranium mining, released in 1962. [27] The federal government eventually regulated the standard amount of radon in mines, setting the level at 0.3 WL on January 1, 1969. [28]

Out of 69 present and former uranium milling sites in 12 states, 24 have been abandoned, and are the responsibility of the US Department of Energy. [29] Accidental releases from uranium mills include the 1979 Church Rock uranium mill spill in New Mexico, called the largest accident of nuclear-related waste in US history, and the 1986 Sequoyah Corporation Fuels Release in Oklahoma. [30]

In 1990, Congress passed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA), granting reparations for those affected by mining, with amendments passed in 2000 to address criticisms with the original act. [27]

Depleted uranium exposure studies

The use of depleted uranium (DU) in munitions is controversial because of questions about potential long-term health effects. [4] [5] [31] Normal functioning of the kidney, brain, liver, heart, and numerous other systems can be affected by uranium exposure, because uranium is a toxic metal. [2] Some people have raised concerns about the use of DU munitions because of its mutagenicity, [32] teratogenicity in mice, [33] [34] neurotoxicity, [35] and its suspected carcinogenic potential. Additional concerns address unexploded DU munitions leeching into groundwater over time. [36]

The toxicity of DU is a point of medical controversy. Multiple studies using cultured cells and laboratory rodents suggest the possibility of leukemogenic, genetic, reproductive, and neurological effects from chronic exposure. [4] A 2005 epidemiology review concluded: "In aggregate the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to DU." [37] The World Health Organization states that no risk of reproductive, developmental, or carcinogenic effects have been reported in humans due to DU exposure. [38] [39] This report has been criticized by Dr. Keith Baverstock for not including possible long-term effects. [40]

Birth defects

Most scientific studies have found no link between uranium and birth defects, but some claim statistical correlations between soldiers exposed to DU, and those who were not, concerning reproductive abnormalities.

One study found epidemiological evidence for increased risk of birth defects in the offspring of persons exposed to DU. [37] Several sources have attributed an increased rate of birth defects in the children of Gulf War veterans and in Iraqis to inhalation of depleted uranium. [34] [41] A 2001 study of 15,000 Gulf War combat veterans and 15,000 control veterans found that the Gulf War veterans were 1.8 (fathers) to 2.8 (mothers) times more likely to have children with birth defects. [42] A study of Gulf War Veterans from the UK found a 50% increased risk of malformed pregnancies reported by men over non-Gulf War veterans. The study did not find correlations between Gulf war deployment and other birth defects such as stillbirth, chromosomal malformations, or congenital syndromes. The father's service in the Gulf War was associated with increased rate of miscarriage, but the mother's service was not. [43]

In animals

Uranium causes reproductive defects and other health problems in rodents, frogs and other animals. Uranium was also shown to have cytotoxic, genotoxic and carcinogenic effects in animals. [44] [45] It has been shown in rodents and frogs that water-soluble forms of uranium are teratogenic. [37] [33] [34]

In soil and microbiology

Bacteria and Pseudomonadota, such as Geobacter and Burkholderia fungorum (strain Rifle), can reduce and fix uranium in soil and groundwater. [46] [47] [48] These bacteria change soluble U(VI) into the highly insoluble complex-forming U(IV) ion, hence stopping chemical leaching.

It has been suggested that it is possible to form a reactive barrier by adding something to the soil which will cause the uranium to become fixed. One method of doing this is to use a mineral (apatite) [49] while a second method is to add a food substance such as acetate to the soil. This will enable bacteria to reduce the uranium(VI) to uranium(IV), which is much less soluble. In peat-like soils, the uranium will tend to bind to the humic acids; this tends to fix the uranium in the soil. [50]

Related Research Articles

Background radiation is a measure of the level of ionizing radiation present in the environment at a particular location which is not due to deliberate introduction of radiation sources.

Radon is a chemical element; it has symbol Rn and atomic number 86. It is a radioactive noble gas and is colorless and odorless. Of the three naturally occurring radon isotopes, only radon-222 has a sufficiently long half-life for it to be released from the soil and rock where it is generated. Radon isotopes are the immediate decay products of radium isotopes. The instability of radon-222, its most stable isotope, makes radon one of the rarest elements. Radon will be present on Earth for several billion more years, despite its short half-life, because it is constantly being produced as a step in the decay chain of uranium-238, and that of thorium-232, each of which is an extremely abundant radioactive nuclide with a half-life of several billion years. The decay of radon produces many other short-lived nuclides, known as "radon daughters", ending at stable isotopes of lead. Radon-222 occurs in significant quantities as a step in the normal radioactive decay chain of uranium-238, also known as the uranium series, which slowly decays into a variety of radioactive nuclides and eventually decays into lead-206, which is stable. Radon-220 occurs in minute quantities as an intermediate step in the decay chain of thorium-232, also known as the thorium series, which eventually decays into lead-208, which is stable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uranium</span> Chemical element with atomic number 92 (U)

Uranium is a chemical element; it has symbol U and atomic number 92. It is a silvery-grey metal in the actinide series of the periodic table. A uranium atom has 92 protons and 92 electrons, of which 6 are valence electrons. Uranium radioactively decays, usually by emitting an alpha particle. The half-life of this decay varies between 159,200 and 4.5 billion years for different isotopes, making them useful for dating the age of the Earth. The most common isotopes in natural uranium are uranium-238 and uranium-235. Uranium has the highest atomic weight of the primordially occurring elements. Its density is about 70% higher than that of lead and slightly lower than that of gold or tungsten. It occurs naturally in low concentrations of a few parts per million in soil, rock and water, and is commercially extracted from uranium-bearing minerals such as uraninite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Depleted uranium</span> Uranium with lower content of 235U

Depleted uranium is uranium with a lower content of the fissile isotope 235U than natural uranium. Natural uranium contains about 0.72% 235U, while the DU used by the U.S. Department of Defense contains 0.3% 235U or less. The less radioactive and non-fissile 238U constitutes the main component of depleted uranium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-renewable resource</span> Class of natural resources

A non-renewable resource is a natural resource that cannot be readily replaced by natural means at a pace quick enough to keep up with consumption. An example is carbon-based fossil fuels. The original organic matter, with the aid of heat and pressure, becomes a fuel such as oil or gas. Earth minerals and metal ores, fossil fuels and groundwater in certain aquifers are all considered non-renewable resources, though individual elements are always conserved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soil contamination</span> Pollution of land by human-made chemicals or other alteration

Soil contamination, soil pollution, or land pollution as a part of land degradation is caused by the presence of xenobiotic (human-made) chemicals or other alteration in the natural soil environment. It is typically caused by industrial activity, agricultural chemicals or improper disposal of waste. The most common chemicals involved are petroleum hydrocarbons, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, solvents, pesticides, lead, and other heavy metals. Contamination is correlated with the degree of industrialization and intensity of chemical substance. The concern over soil contamination stems primarily from health risks, from direct contact with the contaminated soil, vapour from the contaminants, or from secondary contamination of water supplies within and underlying the soil. Mapping of contaminated soil sites and the resulting clean ups are time-consuming and expensive tasks, and require expertise in geology, hydrology, chemistry, computer modelling, and GIS in Environmental Contamination, as well as an appreciation of the history of industrial chemistry.

Environmental issues in Australia describes a number of environmental issues which affect the environment of Australia and are the primary concern of the environmental movement in Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Actinides in the environment</span>

The actinide series is a group of chemical elements with atomic numbers ranging from 89 to 102, including notable elements such as uranium and plutonium. The nuclides thorium-232, uranium-235, and uranium-238 occur primordially, while trace quantities of actinium, protactinium, neptunium, and plutonium exist as a result of radioactive decay and neutron capture of uranium. These elements are far more radioactive than the naturally occurring thorium and uranium, and thus have much shorter half-lives. Elements with atomic numbers greater than 94 do not exist naturally on Earth, and must be produced in a nuclear reactor. However, certain isotopes of elements up to californium still have practical applications which take advantage of their radioactive properties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radium and radon in the environment</span> Significant contributors to environmental radioactivity

Radium and radon are important contributors to environmental radioactivity. Radon occurs naturally as a result of decay of radioactive elements in soil and it can accumulate in houses built on areas where such decay occurs. Radon is a major cause of cancer; it is estimated to contribute to ~2% of all cancer related deaths in Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of nuclear power</span>

Nuclear power has various environmental impacts, both positive and negative, including the construction and operation of the plant, the nuclear fuel cycle, and the effects of nuclear accidents. Nuclear power plants do not burn fossil fuels and so do not directly emit carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide emitted during mining, enrichment, fabrication and transport of fuel is small when compared with the carbon dioxide emitted by fossil fuels of similar energy yield, however, these plants still produce other environmentally damaging wastes. Nuclear energy and renewable energy have reduced environmental costs by decreasing CO2 emissions resulting from energy consumption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental toxicology</span> Multidisciplinary field of science

Environmental toxicology is a multidisciplinary field of science concerned with the study of the harmful effects of various chemical, biological and physical agents on living organisms. Ecotoxicology is a subdiscipline of environmental toxicology concerned with studying the harmful effects of toxicants at the population and ecosystem levels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christopher Busby</span> British scientist

Christopher Busby is a British scientist primarily studying the health effects of internal ionising radiation. Busby is a director of Green Audit Limited, a private company, and scientific advisor to the Low Level Radiation Campaign (LLRC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of war</span> Environmental problems caused by warfare

Study of the environmental impact of war focuses on the modernization of warfare and its increasing effects on the environment. Scorched earth methods have been used for much of recorded history. However, the methods of modern warfare cause far greater devastation on the environment. The progression of warfare from chemical weapons to nuclear weapons has increasingly created stress on ecosystems and the environment. Specific examples of the environmental impact of war include World War I, World War II, the Vietnam War, the Rwandan Civil War, the Kosovo War, the Gulf War, and the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Church Rock uranium mill spill</span> Radioactive spill in New Mexico on July 16, 1979

The Church Rock uranium mill spill occurred in the U.S. state of New Mexico on July 16, 1979, when United Nuclear Corporation's tailings disposal pond at its uranium mill in Church Rock breached its dam. The accident remains the largest release of radioactive material in U.S. history, having released more radioactivity than the Three Mile Island accident four months earlier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uranium mining and the Navajo people</span> Effects of uranium mining on Navajo

The relationship between Uranium mining and the Navajo people began in 1944 in northeastern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, and southeastern Utah.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uranium mining debate</span> Radiological impact of uranium mining

The uranium mining debate covers the political and environmental controversies of uranium mining for use in either nuclear power or nuclear weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of the Gulf wars</span>

The First Gulf War (1990) and the 2003 Iraq War, also known as the Second Gulf War, brought about significant environmental degradation with several facets still negatively impacting the area today. As a frame of reference, the Persian Gulf countries consist of the following states: the UAE, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Kuwait, with the latter two facing the most environmental damage following the two wars due to their central position in the conflict.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bioremediation of radioactive waste</span>

Bioremediation of radioactive waste or bioremediation of radionuclides is an application of bioremediation based on the use of biological agents bacteria, plants and fungi to catalyze chemical reactions that allow the decontamination of sites affected by radionuclides. These radioactive particles are by-products generated as a result of activities related to nuclear energy and constitute a pollution and a radiotoxicity problem due to its unstable nature of ionizing radiation emissions.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Ma, Minghao; Wang, Ruixia; Xu, Lining; Xu, Ming; Liu, Sijin (2020-12-01). "Emerging health risks and underlying toxicological mechanisms of uranium contamination: Lessons from the past two decades". Environment International. 145: 106107. Bibcode:2020EnInt.14506107M. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106107 . ISSN   0160-4120. PMID   32932066.
  2. 1 2 E. S. Craft; A. W. Abu-Qare; M. M. Flaherty; M. C. Garofolo; H. L. Rincavage; M. B. Abou-Donia (2004). "Depleted and natural uranium: chemistry and toxicological effects". Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B: Critical Reviews. 7 (4): 297–317. Bibcode:2004JTEHB...7..297C. doi:10.1080/10937400490452714. PMID   15205046. S2CID   9357795.
  3. Georgia State University. "Biological Half Lives".
  4. 1 2 3 Miller AC, McClain D.; McClain (Jan–Mar 2007). "A review of depleted uranium biological effects: in vitro and in vivo studies". Rev Environ Health. 22 (1): 75–89. doi:10.1515/REVEH.2007.22.1.75. PMID   17508699. S2CID   25156511.
  5. 1 2 Pattison, John E.; Hugtenburg, Richard P.; Green, Stuart (2010). "Enhancement of Natural Background Gamma-radiation Dose around Uranium Micro-particles in the Human Body". Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 7 (45): 603–611. doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0300. PMC   2842777 . PMID   19776147.
  6. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (1993). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation : UNSCEAR 1993 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations. ISBN   978-92-1-142200-9.
  7. Jackson, Robert A.; Montenari, Michael (2019). "Computer modeling of Zircon (ZrSiO4)—Coffinite (USiO4) solid solutions and lead incorporation: Geological implications". Stratigraphy & Timescales. 4: 217–227. doi:10.1016/bs.sats.2019.08.005. ISBN   9780128175521. S2CID   210256739.
  8. Maslov, O. D.; Tserenpil, Sh.; Norov, N.; Gustova, M. V.; Filippov, M. F.; Belov, A. G.; Altangerel, M.; Enhbat, N. (December 2010). "Uranium recovery from coal ash dumps of Mongolia". Solid Fuel Chemistry. 44 (6): 433–438. doi:10.3103/S0361521910060133. S2CID   96643462.
  9. Monnet, Antoine. "Uranium from Coal Ash: An Outlook on Production Capacities" (PDF). iaea.org. Retrieved 22 March 2022.
  10. Hvistendahl, Mara. "Coal Ash Is More Radioactive Than Nuclear Waste". Scientific American. Retrieved 22 March 2022.
  11. US EPA, OAR (22 April 2015). "TENORM: Coal Combustion Residuals". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 22 March 2022.
  12. Ferronskiĭ, V. I.; Poliakov, V. A. (2012). Isotopes of the Earth's hydrosphere. Dordrecht: Springer. ISBN   978-94-007-2856-1. OCLC   780164518.
  13. Benjamin K. Sovacool (2011). Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power: A Critical Global Assessment of Atomic Energy, World Scientific, p. 137.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Graetz, Geordan (2014-12-01). "Uranium mining and First Peoples: the nuclear renaissance confronts historical legacies". Journal of Cleaner Production. Special Volume: The sustainability agenda of the minerals and energy supply and demand network: an integrative analysis of ecological, ethical, economic, and technological dimensions. 84: 339–347. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.055. ISSN   0959-6526.
  15. Roscoe, R. J.; K. Steenland; W. E. Halperin; J. J. Beaumont; R. J. Waxweiler (1989-08-04). "Lung cancer mortality among nonsmoking uranium miners exposed to radon daughters". JAMA. 262 (5): 629–633. doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430050045024. PMID   2746814.
  16. Paul Brown, Gulf troops face tests for cancer guardian.co.uk 25 April 2003, Retrieved February 3, 2009
  17. 1 2 Mitsakou C, Eleftheriadis K, Housiadas C, Lazaridis M Modeling of the dispersion of depleted uranium aerosol. 2003 Apr, Retrieved January 15, 2009
  18. "UNEP confirms low-level DU contamination". United Nations Environment Programme. March 22, 2002. Archived from the original on December 27, 2013. Retrieved June 18, 2006.
  19. "Depleted uranium". Department of Defense. Archived from the original on June 14, 2006.
  20. "As nuclear waste piles up, scientists seek the best long-term storage solutions". cen.acs.org. Retrieved 2023-03-12.
  21. Burakov, B.E.; Ojovan, M.I.; Lee, W.E. (2010). "Crystalline Materials for Actinide Immobilisation". London: Imperial College Press. Archived from the original on 2012-03-09. Retrieved 2010-10-16.
  22. "Focus: Depleted Uranium". International Atomic Energy Agency. Archived from the original on March 18, 2010. Retrieved August 28, 2010.
  23. Diamond, Gary; Wohlers, David; Plewak, Daneil; Llados, Fernando; Ingerman, Lisa; Wilbur, Sharon; Scinicariello, Franco; Roney, Nickolette; Faroon, Obaid (February 2013). HEALTH EFFECTS. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (US).
  24. Braun, O.; Contino, C.; Hengé-Napoli, M.H.; Ansoborlo, E.; Pucci, B. (1999). "Development of an in vitro test for screening of chelators of uranium". Analusis . 27: 65–68. doi: 10.1051/analusis:1999108 .
  25. Dewar, Dale; Harvey, Linda; Vakil, Cathy (2013). "Uranium mining and health". Canadian Family Physician. 59 (5): 469–471. ISSN   0008-350X. PMC   3653646 . PMID   23673579.
  26. Sarkar, Atanu (2019-12-01). "Nuclear power and uranium mining: current global perspectives and emerging public health risks". Journal of Public Health Policy. 40 (4): 383–392. doi:10.1057/s41271-019-00177-2. ISSN   1745-655X. PMID   31292510. S2CID   195879522.
  27. 1 2 Dawson, Susan E, and Gary E Madsen. "Uranium Mine Workers, Atomic Downwinders, and the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act." In Half Lives & Half-Truths: Confronting the Radioactive Legacies of the Cold War, 117-143. Santa Fe: School For Advanced Research, 2007)
  28. Brugge, Doug, Timothy Benally, and Esther Yazzie-Lewis. The Navajo People and Uranium Mining. Albuquerque : University of New Mexico Press, 2006.
  29. Decommissioning of U.S. Uranium Production Facilities
  30. Doug Brugge, et al, "The Sequoyah Corporation Fuels Release and the Church Rock Spill", American Journal of Public Health, September 2007, Vol., 97, No. 9, pp. 1595-1600.
  31. A. L. Kennedy (July 10, 2003). "Our gift to Iraq". The Guardian .
  32. Monleau, Marjorie; De Méo, Michel; Paquet, François; Chazel, Valérie; Duménil, Gérard; Donnadieu-Claraz, Marie (1 January 2006). "Genotoxic and Inflammatory Effects of Depleted Uranium Particles Inhaled by Rats". Toxicological Sciences. 89 (1): 287–295. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj010 . PMID   16221956.
  33. 1 2 Darryl P. Arfsten, Kenneth R. Still & Glenn D. Ritchie (June 2001). "A review of the effects of uranium and depleted uranium exposure on reproduction and fetal development". Toxicology and Industrial Health . 17 (5–10): 180–191. Bibcode:2001ToxIH..17..180A. doi:10.1191/0748233701th111oa. PMID   12539863. S2CID   25310165.
  34. 1 2 3 J. L. Domingo (2001). "Reproductive and developmental toxicity of natural and depleted uranium: a review". Reprod. Toxicol. 15 (6): 603–9. doi:10.1016/S0890-6238(01)00181-2. PMID   11738513. S2CID   38317769.
  35. W. Briner & J. Murray (2005). "Effects of short-term and long-term depleted uranium exposure on open-field behavior and brain lipid oxidation in rats". Neurotoxicology and Teratology . 27 (1): 135–44. doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2004.09.001. PMID   15681127.
  36. Sheppard, S.C.; Sheppard, M.I.; Gallerand, M.O.; Sanipelli, B. (2005). "Derivation of ecotoxicity thresholds for uranium". Journal of Environmental Radioactivity . 79 (1): 55–83. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.05.015. PMID   15571876.
  37. 1 2 3 Rita Hindin, Doug Brugge & Bindu Panikkar (2005). "Teratogenicity of depleted uranium aerosols: A review from an epidemiological perspective". Environmental Health . 4 (1): 17. Bibcode:2005EnvHe...4...17H. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-4-17 . PMC   1242351 . PMID   16124873.
  38. World Health Organization. "Depleted uranium". Archived from the original on August 15, 2012.
  39. World Health Organization. "Depleted uranium". Archived from the original on 2011-01-26. Retrieved 2011-01-26.
  40. Keith Baverstock. "Depleted Uranium Weapons" (PDF).
  41. Q. Y. Hu & S. P. Zhu (July 1990). "Induction of chromosomal aberrations in male mouse germ cells by uranyl fluoride containing enriched uranium" (PDF). Mutation Research . 244 (3): 209–214. doi:10.1016/0165-7992(90)90130-C. PMID   2366813.
  42. Kang, Han; Magee, Carol; Mahan, Clare; Lee, Kyung; Murphy, Frances; Jackson, Leila; Matanoski, Genevieve (October 2001). "Pregnancy Outcomes Among U.S. Gulf War Veterans". Annals of Epidemiology. 11 (7): 504–511. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00245-9. PMID   11557183.
  43. Doyle, Pat; Maconochie, Noreen; Davies, Graham; Maconochie, Ian; Pelerin, Margo; Prior, Susan; Lewis, Samantha (February 2004). "Miscarriage, stillbirth and congenital malformation in the offspring of UK veterans of the first Gulf war". International Journal of Epidemiology . 33 (1): 74–86. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh049 . PMID   15075150. Archived from the original on 2008-09-05. Retrieved 2006-06-18.
  44. Lin, Ruey H.; Wu, Lih J.; Lee, Ching H.; Lin-Shiau, Shoei Y. (November 1993). "Cytogenetic toxicity of uranyl nitrate in Chinese hamster ovary cells". Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology. 319 (3): 197–203. doi:10.1016/0165-1218(93)90079-S. PMID   7694141.
  45. Miller, A.C.; Bonait-Pellie, C.; Merlot, R.F.; Michel, J.; Stewart, M.; Lison, P.D. (November 2005). "Leukemic transformation of hematopoietic cells in mice internally exposed to depleted uranium". Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry . 279 (1–2): 97–104. doi:10.1007/s11010-005-8226-z. PMID   16283518. S2CID   19417920.
  46. Renshaw, Joanna C.; Butchins, Laura J. C.; Livens, Francis R.; May, Iain; Charnock, John M.; Lloyd, Jonathan R. (1 August 2005). "Bioreduction of Uranium: Environmental Implications of a Pentavalent Intermediate". Environmental Science & Technology. 39 (15): 5657–5660. Bibcode:2005EnST...39.5657R. doi:10.1021/es048232b. PMID   16124300.
  47. Anderson, Robert T.; Vrionis, Helen A.; Ortiz-Bernad, Irene; Resch, Charles T.; Long, Philip E.; Dayvault, Richard; Karp, Ken; Marutzky, Sam; Metzler, Donald R.; Peacock, Aaron; White, David C.; Lowe, Mary; Lovley, Derek R. (October 2003). "Stimulating the In Situ Activity of Geobacter Species To Remove Uranium from the Groundwater of a Uranium-Contaminated Aquifer". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 69 (10): 5884–5891. Bibcode:2003ApEnM..69.5884A. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.10.5884-5891.2003. PMC   201226 . PMID   14532040.
  48. Koribanics, Nicole M.; Tuorto, Steven J.; et al. (13 April 2015). "Spatial Distribution of an Uranium-Respiring Betaproteobacterium at the Rifle, CO Field Research Site". PLOS ONE. 10 (4): e0123378. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1023378K. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123378 . PMC   4395306 . PMID   25874721.
  49. Christopher C. Fuller, John R. Bargar & James A Davis (November 20, 2003). "Remediation of uranium-contaminated water at Fry Canyon, Utah". Stanford University.
  50. "Geochemistry" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on December 12, 2004.